Ca2+ Control of Transcription
Can We Extrapolate Signaling Cascades From Neurons to Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells?
Jump to

The Ca2+ hypothesis of transcription suggests that increments in the cytosolic Ca2+ concentration [Ca2+]c can activate transcription. The Ca2+ hypothesis has emerged in the field of neurosciences1,2 and was translated to vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC) by the Burlington group.3–5 The article by Pulver et al in this issue6 demonstrates a close correlation between the increase in [Ca2+]c, phosphorylation of nuclear CREB, and the expression of c-fos. Pulver et al introduce the idea that transcriptional activation may be regulated by store-operated Ca2+ entry (SOCE)7–9 as it is activated when thapsigargin blocks the Ca2+-ATPase SERCA, thereby depleting the SR Ca2+ content. The authors demonstrate this thapsigargin effect not only in cultured VSMC but also in VSMC of intact arteries. They conclude that SOCE may activate transcription and may therefore control the differentiated (contractile) or proliferative (secretory) phenotype of VSMC.10
Ca2+-Mediated Phosphorylation of CREB
The Ca2+/cAMP response element binding protein CREB is a transcription factor.11 CREB transcriptional activation occurs through its binding to the CREB-binding protein, CBP, a co-activator protein that links to many factors of the general transcriptional machinery. Phosphorylation of CREB at Ser-133 increases its affinity for CBP, and it can be observed with phospho-specific antibodies. CREB can be phosphorylated not only at SER-133 but also at S-142. Phosphorylation is mediated by a variety of kinases, with the cAMP/PKA pathway often being the principal modulator.12 In the case of Ca2+-dependent activation, CREB phosphorylation is thought to result from the following signaling cascade:13 Ca2+ binds to calmodulin, Ca2+/CaM enters the nucleus and activates calmodulin-dependent kinase IV (CaMKIV), with Ca2+/CaMKIV phosphorylating CREB. In addition, Ca2+/CaM activates CaMKIV kinases that substantially enhance Ca2+/CaMKIV activity. Further, Ca2+/CaMKIV can regulate CREB binding protein by direct phosphorylation.13 Whether and to what extent these cascades apply to VSMC have not yet been clarified.
Ca2+ Controls Transcription Beyond CREB
Ca2+/CaM modulate transcriptional activation via signaling cascades in addition to the CREB cascade. For example, Ca2+/CaM activates the phosphatase calcineurin (CaN) that activates NFAT.14 Dephosphorylated NFAT can enter the nucleus, where it binds to and activates CBP in synergy with MEF2. Diverse transcription-dependent forms of neuronal plasticity suggest that the Ca2+ concentration in the cytosol, [Ca2+]c, and in the nuclear matrix, [Ca2+]nu, can modulate transcription differentially.15 For example, [Ca2+]nu is known to activate the retinoic acid orphan receptor via Ca2+/CaMKIV. [Ca2+]nu activates members of the MEF2 family of transcription factors via Ca2+/CaMKIV phosphorylation. Independently of CaM, elevated [Ca2+]nu can activate p38, which in turn phosphorylates and activates MEF2.13 Increments in [Ca2+]nu and Ca2+/CaM have been reported to inhibit transcription when they activate Cabin-1, which competes with CBP for binding to MEF2. Because Cabin-1 associates with histone deacetylases 1 and 2, its dissociation from MEF2 may replace a repressing complex with an activating complex. Thus, Ca2+/CaMKIV could enhance MEF2 transcription in an indirect way.16
The list of cascades involved in the Ca2+ modulation of transcription could be extended. It has been previously reported that elevated Ca2+ modulates transcription not through a single pathway, but via multiple cascades. Extrapolation of the present knowledge from neuronal to vascular tissue requires a re-analysis of the existence and function of these components. The use of transgenic mice will likely further our understanding of which one of the cascades described is important for VSMC. Future experiments should extend global measurements of [Ca2+]c through Ca2+ imaging to provide information on whether the Ca2+ concentration increases close to the sarcolemma, either in the central parts of the cytosol or within the nuclear matrix.
Elevated [Ca2+]c Results From Multiple Ca2+ Fluxes
The cellular distribution of Ca2+ ions is tightly controlled. In VSMC, [Ca2+]c increases as consequences of passive Ca2+ influx through the sarcolemma (Ca2+ channels and nonselective cation channels) and Ca2+ release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum SR (ryanodine and IP3 receptors). [Ca2+]c decreases because of ATPases that transport Ca2+ ions into the extracellular space (PMCA) and into the SR Ca2+ store (SERCA). In addition, [Ca2+]c decreases when Ca2+ ions bind to the mobile and fixed buffers in the cytosol and translocate into cell compartments such as the mitochondria (Ca2+ uniporter in the inner mitochondrial membrane) or the nucleus (pathways are controversial at present).
Ca2+ influx through dihydropyridine-sensitive L-type Ca2+ channels generates the Ca2+ current ICa-L. In VSMC, ICa-L has been thoroughly studied. The results help to explain how ICa-L increases [Ca2+]c and activates contraction, and how drugs relax VSMC (eg, dihydropyridines blocking Ca2+ channels; K+ channel openers gating Ca2+ channels). Whereas L-type Ca2+ channels are voltage-gated, a small (+10 mV) change in membrane potential has been shown to increase [Ca2+]c by 75 nM.17 The influence of voltage-gated ICa-L is often demonstrated by measuring increments in [Ca2+]c or in contractile force by superfusing solutions with elevated [KCl]. The specific contribution of ICa-L is shown by blocking the events with dihydropyridines. In this way, the Burlington group3,4 has elaborated on the impact of membrane depolarisation and Ca2+ influx through L-type Ca2+ channels for transcriptional activation by correlating increments in [Ca2+]c, CREB-phosphorylation, and c-fos expression. They also defined the components of the cascade by means of “specific” inhibitors: dihydropyridines for ICa-L, calmidazolium for CaM, and KN-93 for inhibition of calmodulin-dependent kinases.
The article by Pulver et al6 asks whether transcriptional activation can be activated by additional Ca2+ influx pathways. The authors demonstrate that SOCE can both increase [Ca2+]c and activate CREB phosphorylation and c-fos expression, similar to ICa-L. In cultured VSMC, SOCE seems to be the only vehicle for significant Ca2+ influx, as can be expected from a preparation that rapidly loses the L-type Ca2+ channels when it dedifferentiates in tissue culture. However, results from cultured VSMC may be misleading. For example, studies in rat aortic VSMC indicated that loading the cells with BAPTA did not prevent but rather stimulated the KCl-induced or stretch-induced CREB phosphorylation.18 It must then be recognized that Pulver et al repeated their experiments in VSMC of intact arteries. In doing so, the authors demonstrated that VSMC of intact arteries responded to thapsigargin with increments in [Ca2+]c and CREB phosphorylation, and that the efficacy of thapsigargin was at least as high as the efficacy of membrane depolarisation.
Does SOCE Increase [Ca2+]c at Physiological Conditions?
The work by Thrastup et al shows activation of SOCE by treating VSMC with thapsigargin, an inhibitor of the SR Ca2+-ATPase SERCA.19 Instead of using electrophysiology, the authors define Ca2+ influx via SOCE by measuring thapsigarin-induced increments in [Ca2+]c with a fluorescent Ca2+ chameleon indicator. Involvement of SOCE is demonstrated by blocking the [Ca2+]c increment, which is accomplished by lowering the extracellular Ca2+ concentration or by blocking the SOCE with Ni2+ or specific drugs. Although the Ca2+ flux is not directly measured, these experiments are state-of-the-art. The results demonstrate without doubt the importance of SOCE for the [Ca2+]c balance of VSMC when SERCA activity is inhibited or blocked.
Although these results are easy to accept in context with membrane physiology, it becomes problematic to apply these results to transcriptional control in vivo, where SERCA is active. Sun et al compared the increments in [Ca2+]c caused by thapsigargin with those caused by administration of serum, an intervention known to stimulate IP3-mediated Ca2+ release.20 Serum transiently increased [Ca2+]c, and the comparison between increments in [Ca2+]c caused by to serum and thapsigargin suggests that [Ca2+]c can be reliably measured with chameleon Ca2+ indicator. The comparison, however, does not address the point of whether the “physiological” serum-induced increment in [Ca2+]c can activate CREB phosphorylation at all or to an extent similar to post-thapsigargin application.
These unanswered questions should not exclude SOCE as a potentially important player in the Ca2+ control of transcription. Typically, SOCE caused by IP3-induced SR Ca2+ release can be measured only if SERCA was inhibited (thapsigargin), or if Ca2+ was heavily buffered by millimolar concentrations of EGTA or BAPTA.8,9 Recent work on white blood cells (RBL-1 cells) demonstrates that IP3-induced Ca2+ transients can activate SOCE at physiological conditions, providing that the mitochondria take-up Ca2+ from SOCE.9 In other words, in the absence of exogenous buffers and without competition from noninhibited SERCA, the Ca2+ ions released from SR are rapidly transferred into mitochondria. Mitochondria may be suitable for just such a job, because they colocalize with the domains of Ca2+ entry via SOCE and with the SERCA in the ER.21 In this way, mitochondria can reduce the rate and amount of refilling SR with Ca2+ and can therefore reduce the inactivation of SOCE. These results suggest that SOCE can significantly contribute to the physiological Ca2+ balance of leukocytes.9 Whether similar arguments apply to SOCE in VSMC has yet to be analyzed.
Ca2+ Control of Transcription in VSMC: Where Do We Stay?
Neuroscience suggests that the Ca2+ control of transcription can adapt cell function to a wide variety of demands, from synaptic plasticity to cell metabolism. The diversity of the effects is attributed to the distribution of the Ca2+ signals over time and space. In neurons, the time domain is the interval between the groups of action potentials.22 The space domain depends on the place where the Ca2+-permeable neuronal synapses localize. With regard to long-term potentiation, Ca2+ influx through L-type Ca2+ channels has a higher efficacy than Ca2+ influx via NMDA receptors.23 The results suggest that the colocalization of the Ca2+-permeable membrane channel with submembranous proteins could be a key factor. The information changes, for example, after Ca2+ ions have bound to diffusible proteins (such as CaM)—it can slowly spread over longer distances than can the Ca2+ ions, whose diffusion is fast but limited in space by Ca2+ binding. The effects of increments in cytosolic [Ca2+]c have been separated from those of elevated nuclear [Ca2+]nu, ie, these 2 events seem to modulate different Ca2+-dependent cascades.24 Understanding how [Ca2+]c and [Ca2+]nu operate together is only the beginning.
In comparison with neuroscience, vascular biology analyzes the “Ca2+ control of transcription” with fewer groups and over a shorter time period. The article by Pulver et al6 is an important step in furthering our understanding. However, it is also an example that much work is still needed to provide information on specific signaling cascades, to differentiate effects caused by cytosolic from those caused by nuclear Ca2+, and to find out if the state of mitochondrial respiration modulates the efficacy by which SOCE can contribute to increments in [Ca2+]c or in transcription. Expanding on the work of the Burlington group will surely further our understanding of VSMC, their plasticity between differentiated contractile phenotype, and the proliferating phenotype involved in the development of vascular pathologies. Any new developments will likely profit from the neurosciences, because any new studies will initially apply similar questions, models, and methods as those already used in the neurosciences field. Pulver et al6 have introduced the idea that transcription may be activated when the Ca2+ stores are emptied. Whether this hypothesis holds true when the store is emptied by more physiological, agonist-induced SR Ca2+ release remains to be tested. Regardless, ideas and results presented by Pulver et al will certainly stimulate the community of cardiovascular biologists to further test and study the Ca2+ hypothesis in future experiments.
Footnotes
-
The opinions expressed in this editorial are not necessarily those of the editors or of the American Heart Association.
References
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
Wellman GC, Cartin L, Eckman DM, Stevenson AS, Saundry CM, Lederer WJ, Nelson MT. Membrane depolarization, elevated Ca2+ entry, and gene expression in cerebral arteries of hypertensive rats. Am Journal of Physiology: Heart and Circulatory Physiology. 2001; 281: H2559–H2567.
- ↵
Cartin L, Lounsbury KM, Nelson MT. Coupling of Ca2+ to CREB activation and gene expression in intact cerebral arteries from mouse. Roles of ryanodine receptors and voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels. Circ Res. 2000; 86: 760–767.
- ↵
- ↵
Pulver RA, Rose-Curtis P, Roe MW, Wellmann GC, Lounsbury KM. Store-operated Ca2+ entry activates the CREB transcription factor in vascular smooth muscle. Circ Res. 2004; 94: 1351–1358.
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
Lindqvist A, Nordström I, Malmqvist U, Nordenfelt P, Hellstrand P. Long-term effects of Ca2+ on structure and contractility of vascular smooth muscle. Am J Physiol: Cell Physiol. 1999; 277: C64–C73.
- ↵
- ↵
Pilz RB, Casteel DE. Regulation of gene expression by cyclic GMP. Circ Res. 2003; 93: 1034–1046.
- ↵
Corcoran EE, Means AR. Defining Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase cascades in transcriptional regulation. J Biol Chem. 2001; 276: 2975–2978.
- ↵
- ↵
Grewal SS, Fass DM, Yao H, Ellig CL, Goodman RH, Stork PJS. Calcium and cAMP signals differentially regulate cAMP-responsive element-binding protein function via a Rap1-extracellular signal-regulated kinase pathway. J Biol Chem. 2000; 275: 34433–34441.
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
Hipper, A. and Isenberg, G. Stretch-induced CREB-phosphorylation is enhanced by Ca2+-chelation in aortic smooth muscle cells. Pflugers Arch Eur J Physiol. 2003; 445, S23.
- ↵
Thastrup O, Cullen PJ, Drobak BK, Hanley MR, Dawson AP. Thapsigargin, a tumor promotor, discharges intracellular Ca2+ stores by specific inhibition of the endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase. PNAS. 1990; 87: 2466–2470.
- ↵
Sun X, Mork AC, Helmke RJ, Martinez JR, Zhang GH. Effects of serum on calcium mobilization in the submandibular cell line A235. J Cell Biochem. 2004; 73: 458–468.
- ↵
Rizzuto R, Pinton P, Carrington W, Fay FS, Fogarty KE, Lifshitz LM, Tuft RA, Pozzan T. Close contacts with the endoplasmic reticulum as determinants of mitochondrial Ca2+ responses. Science. 1998; 280: 1763–1766.
- ↵
Fields RD, Eshete F, Stevens B, Itoh K. Action potential-dependent regulation of gene expression: Temporal specificity in Ca2+ cAMP-responsive element binding proteins, and mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling. J Neurosci. 1997; 17: 7252–7266.
- ↵
- ↵
This Issue
Jump to
Article Tools
- Ca2+ Control of TranscriptionGerrit IsenbergCirculation Research. 2004;94:1276-1278, originally published May 27, 2004https://doi.org/10.1161/01.RES.0000131752.94031.37
Citation Manager Formats