Skip to main content
  • American Heart Association
  • Science Volunteer
  • Warning Signs
  • Advanced Search
  • Donate

  • Home
  • About this Journal
    • Editorial Board
    • Meet the Editors
    • Editorial Manifesto
    • Impact Factor
    • Journal History
    • General Statistics
  • All Issues
  • Subjects
    • All Subjects
    • Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research
    • Critical Care and Resuscitation
    • Epidemiology, Lifestyle, and Prevention
    • Genetics
    • Heart Failure and Cardiac Disease
    • Hypertension
    • Imaging and Diagnostic Testing
    • Intervention, Surgery, Transplantation
    • Quality and Outcomes
    • Stroke
    • Vascular Disease
  • Browse Features
    • Circulation Research Profiles
    • Trainees & Young Investigators
    • Research Around the World
    • News & Views
    • The NHLBI Page
    • Viewpoints
    • Compendia
    • Reviews
    • Recent Review Series
    • Profiles in Cardiovascular Science
    • Leaders in Cardiovascular Science
    • Commentaries on Cutting Edge Science
    • AHA/BCVS Scientific Statements
    • Abstract Supplements
    • Circulation Research Classics
    • In This Issue Archive
    • Anthology of Images
  • Resources
    • Online Submission/Peer Review
    • Why Submit to Circulation Research
    • Instructions for Authors
    • → Article Types
    • → Manuscript Preparation
    • → Submission Tips
    • → Journal Policies
    • Circulation Research Awards
    • Image Gallery
    • Council on Basic Cardiovascular Sciences
    • Customer Service & Ordering Info
    • International Users
  • AHA Journals
    • AHA Journals Home
    • Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology (ATVB)
    • Circulation
    • → Circ: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • → Circ: Genomic and Precision Medicine
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Imaging
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Interventions
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes
    • → Circ: Heart Failure
    • Circulation Research
    • Hypertension
    • Stroke
    • Journal of the American Heart Association
  • Impact Factor 13.965
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

  • My alerts
  • Sign In
  • Join

  • Advanced search

Header Publisher Menu

  • American Heart Association
  • Science Volunteer
  • Warning Signs
  • Advanced Search
  • Donate

Circulation Research

  • My alerts
  • Sign In
  • Join

  • Impact Factor 13.965
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Home
  • About this Journal
    • Editorial Board
    • Meet the Editors
    • Editorial Manifesto
    • Impact Factor
    • Journal History
    • General Statistics
  • All Issues
  • Subjects
    • All Subjects
    • Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research
    • Critical Care and Resuscitation
    • Epidemiology, Lifestyle, and Prevention
    • Genetics
    • Heart Failure and Cardiac Disease
    • Hypertension
    • Imaging and Diagnostic Testing
    • Intervention, Surgery, Transplantation
    • Quality and Outcomes
    • Stroke
    • Vascular Disease
  • Browse Features
    • Circulation Research Profiles
    • Trainees & Young Investigators
    • Research Around the World
    • News & Views
    • The NHLBI Page
    • Viewpoints
    • Compendia
    • Reviews
    • Recent Review Series
    • Profiles in Cardiovascular Science
    • Leaders in Cardiovascular Science
    • Commentaries on Cutting Edge Science
    • AHA/BCVS Scientific Statements
    • Abstract Supplements
    • Circulation Research Classics
    • In This Issue Archive
    • Anthology of Images
  • Resources
    • Online Submission/Peer Review
    • Why Submit to Circulation Research
    • Instructions for Authors
    • → Article Types
    • → Manuscript Preparation
    • → Submission Tips
    • → Journal Policies
    • Circulation Research Awards
    • Image Gallery
    • Council on Basic Cardiovascular Sciences
    • Customer Service & Ordering Info
    • International Users
  • AHA Journals
    • AHA Journals Home
    • Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology (ATVB)
    • Circulation
    • → Circ: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • → Circ: Genomic and Precision Medicine
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Imaging
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Interventions
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes
    • → Circ: Heart Failure
    • Circulation Research
    • Hypertension
    • Stroke
    • Journal of the American Heart Association
Letter to the Editor

Physical Training and Restenosis

Michael Ward
Download PDF
https://doi.org/10.1161/01.RES.0000067466.48892.EC
Circulation Research. 2003;92:e60
Originally published April 4, 2003
Michael Ward
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Jump to

  • Article
    • References
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
Loading

To the Editor:

I read with interest the article by Indolfi et al in the December 13, 2002, issue of Circulation Research entitled “Physical Training Increases eNOS Vascular Expression and Activity and Reduces Restenosis After Balloon Angioplasty or Arterial Stenting in Rats” in which the authors show that regular exercise reduces neointima formation after stenting and balloon angioplasty and also inhibits negative remodeling after balloon angioplasty.1 They concluded that the benefits of exercise were attributable to enhanced eNOS activity. I have some doubts on this conclusion.

First, the differences in neointima formation, remodeling, and reendothelialization could at least in part be explained by the effects of exercise on these vessels before the injury. Exercise training started 14 days before the balloon or stent injury and if this significantly increased vessel size prior to the injury, then the amount of injury created by standard techniques would be significantly reduced in the larger vessel. Data from the operated vessels 2 days after injury showed that there was little if any increase in external elastic lamina (EEL) area in the uninjured vessel, which is reassuring that the injured vessel was unlikely to be bigger 2 days prior. In studies of physiological remodeling, permanent change in arterial size is apparent 7 days after changes in flow,2 so any measurements of carotid blood flow (CBF) at varying time points after exercise training would be useful in discerning whether 14 days of training is required to result in sustained increases in CBF.

Second, the site of arteriotomy for the carotid balloon injury is also important as an external carotid site and with subsequent ligation of the external carotid would substantially reduce carotid blood flow in the sedentary animals as shown in online Figure 2. This in turn could also explain the negative remodeling and enhanced intima formation in this group.3

Finally, the assay used to detect endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) activity is not specific for the eNOS and would also reflect activity of inducible NOS (iNOS), which is also significantly affected by vessel injury. While the changes in eNOS activity were mirrored by changes in detectable eNOS by immunoblotting, it would be useful to know the specificity of the antibodies used to eNOS relative to iNOS and why different antibodies were used for immunoblotting versus immunohistochemistry for eNOS.

References

  1. ↵
    Indolfi C, Torella D, Coppola C, Curcio A, Rodriguez F, Bilancio A, Leccia A, Arcucci O, Falco M, Leosco D, Chiariello M. Physical training increases eNOS vascular expression and activity and reduces restenosis after balloon angioplasty or arterial stenting in rats. Circ Res. 2002; 91: 1190–1197.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Rudic RD, Bucci M, Fulton D, Segal SS, Sessa WC. Temporal events underlying arterial remodeling after chronic flow reduction in mice: correlation of structural changes with a deficit in basal nitric oxide synthesis. Circ Res. 2000; 86: 1160–1166.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Ward MR, Tsao PS, Agrotis A, Dilley RJ, Jennings GL, Bobik A. Low blood flow after angioplasty augments mechanisms of restenosis: inward vessel remodeling, cell migration, and activity of genes regulating migration. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2001; 21: 208–213.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text

Response

We thank Dr Ward for his interest in our study focused on the effects of physical exercise on restenosis after angioplasty or stenting.1

However, Dr Ward was wondering whether the beneficial effects of training are related to (a) endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) upregulation; (b) the effects of flow induced by exercise prior to the angioplasty/stenting; or (c) the ligation of carotid collateral vessel (that could reduce absolute flow in the common carotid artery).

In our manuscript, we documented for the first time that regular exercise reduces neointimal formation after angioplasty and, more interestingly, after stenting.1

How could exercise affect the neointimal formation? One possibility is that exercise prior to the angioplasty increased the vessel diameter (by eNOS upregulation). As stated in the manuscript, the histological findings at 2 days after balloon angioplasty did not show any difference in lumen diameter between groups, making it unlikely that this effect could explain the beneficial effect of exercise in preventing neointimal hyperplasia. Furthermore, regarding the stent protocol, it has to be pointed out that in order to minimize the role of arterial diameter before the stent deployment, we oversized the carotid arteries by implanting the stents with a balloon/artery ratio of 1.5:1.2 In addition, since the neointimal formation is proportional to the inflation pressure,3 we kept the atmosphere constant at 1.5.2,3 Therefore, as described in our study protocol, the ligation of the external carotid artery cannot explain the different results of neointimal formation between sedentary and exercised animals, since this artery was ligated in both groups. Nevertheless, as we stated in the limitation section of our manuscript, we cannot exclude that changes in blood flow and shear stress after exercise could have contributed to our results by increasing eNOS expression and activity.1

Finally, in the kit used for NOS activity, incubations were performed in either the presence or absence of EGTA (2 mmol/L) to determine the Ca2+-dependent NOS activities as previously described.4 Because of this, we strongly believe that the measured activity reflects mainly constitutive NOS activity. Furthermore, it should be noted that the role of inducible NOS (iNOS) on neointimal hyperplasia after vascular injury has been a matter of debate because of its inflammatory property, this of course being at odds with the beneficial effect described in our study.1 We used different eNOS antibodies for immunoblotting versus immunohistochemistry (both of them specific for eNOS and not cross-reacting with iNOS), because these antibodies were more efficient given the methods used.

In conclusion, we strongly believe that the evidence provided in our study is a striking demonstration that exercise is beneficial in terms of neointimal proliferation reduction after vascular injury, and that upregulation of eNOS expression and activity is linked to these effects.

References

  1. ↵
    Indolfi C, Torella D, Coppola C, Curcio A, Rodriguez F, Bilancio A, Leccia A, Arcucci O, Falco M, Leosco D, Chiariello M. Physical training increases eNOS vascular expression and activity and reduces restenosis after balloon angioplasty or arterial stenting in rats. Circ Res. 2002; 91: 1190–1197.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Indolfi C, Esposito G, Stabile E, Cavuto L, Pisani A, Coppola C, Torella D, Perrino C, Di Lorenzo E, Curcio A, Palombini L, Chiariello M. A new rat model of small vessel stenting. Basic Res Cardiol. 2000; 95: 179–185.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Indolfi C, Esposito G, Di Lorenzo E, Rapacciuolo A, Feliciello A, Porcellini A, Avvedimento VE, Condorelli M, Chiariello M. Smooth muscle cell proliferation is proportional to the degree of balloon injury in a rat model of angioplasty. Circulation. 1995; 92: 1230–1235.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    Moreno C, Lopez A, Llinas MT, Rodriguez F, Lopez-Farre A, Nava E, Salazar FJ. Changes in NOS activity and protein expression during acute and prolonged ANG II administration. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2002; 282: R31–R37.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

Circulation Research
April 4, 2003, Volume 92, Issue 6
  • Table of Contents
Previous ArticleNext Article

Jump to

  • Article
    • References
    • References
  • Info & Metrics

Article Tools

  • Print
  • Citation Tools
    Physical Training and Restenosis
    Michael Ward
    Circulation Research. 2003;92:e60, originally published April 4, 2003
    https://doi.org/10.1161/01.RES.0000067466.48892.EC

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
  • Article Alerts
    Log in to Email Alerts with your email address.
  • Save to my folders

Share this Article

  • Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Circulation Research.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Physical Training and Restenosis
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from Circulation Research
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the Circulation Research web site.
  • Share on Social Media
    Physical Training and Restenosis
    Michael Ward
    Circulation Research. 2003;92:e60, originally published April 4, 2003
    https://doi.org/10.1161/01.RES.0000067466.48892.EC
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

Related Articles

Cited By...

Circulation Research

  • About Circulation Research
  • Editorial Board
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Abstract Supplements
  • AHA Statements and Guidelines
  • Permissions
  • Reprints
  • Email Alerts
  • Open Access Information
  • AHA Journals RSS
  • AHA Newsroom

Editorial Office Address:
3355 Keswick Rd
Main Bldg 103
Baltimore, MD 21211
CircRes@circresearch.org

Information for:
  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Subscriber Help
  • Institutions / Librarians
  • Institutional Subscriptions FAQ
  • International Users
American Heart Association Learn and Live
National Center
7272 Greenville Ave.
Dallas, TX 75231

Customer Service

  • 1-800-AHA-USA-1
  • 1-800-242-8721
  • Local Info
  • Contact Us

About Us

Our mission is to build healthier lives, free of cardiovascular diseases and stroke. That single purpose drives all we do. The need for our work is beyond question. Find Out More about the American Heart Association

  • Careers
  • SHOP
  • Latest Heart and Stroke News
  • AHA/ASA Media Newsroom

Our Sites

  • American Heart Association
  • American Stroke Association
  • For Professionals
  • More Sites

Take Action

  • Advocate
  • Donate
  • Planned Giving
  • Volunteer

Online Communities

  • AFib Support
  • Garden Community
  • Patient Support Network
  • Professional Online Network

Follow Us:

  • Follow Circulation on Twitter
  • Visit Circulation on Facebook
  • Follow Circulation on Google Plus
  • Follow Circulation on Instagram
  • Follow Circulation on Pinterest
  • Follow Circulation on YouTube
  • Rss Feeds
  • Privacy Policy
  • Copyright
  • Ethics Policy
  • Conflict of Interest Policy
  • Linking Policy
  • Diversity
  • Careers

©2018 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. The American Heart Association is a qualified 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization.
*Red Dress™ DHHS, Go Red™ AHA; National Wear Red Day ® is a registered trademark.

  • PUTTING PATIENTS FIRST National Health Council Standards of Excellence Certification Program
  • BBB Accredited Charity
  • Comodo Secured