Skip to main content
  • American Heart Association
  • Science Volunteer
  • Warning Signs
  • Advanced Search
  • Donate

  • Home
  • About this Journal
    • Editorial Board
    • Meet the Editors
    • Editorial Manifesto
    • Impact Factor
    • Journal History
    • General Statistics
  • All Issues
  • Subjects
    • All Subjects
    • Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research
    • Critical Care and Resuscitation
    • Epidemiology, Lifestyle, and Prevention
    • Genetics
    • Heart Failure and Cardiac Disease
    • Hypertension
    • Imaging and Diagnostic Testing
    • Intervention, Surgery, Transplantation
    • Quality and Outcomes
    • Stroke
    • Vascular Disease
  • Browse Features
    • Circulation Research Profiles
    • Trainees & Young Investigators
    • Research Around the World
    • News & Views
    • The NHLBI Page
    • Viewpoints
    • Compendia
    • Reviews
    • Recent Review Series
    • Profiles in Cardiovascular Science
    • Leaders in Cardiovascular Science
    • Commentaries on Cutting Edge Science
    • AHA/BCVS Scientific Statements
    • Abstract Supplements
    • Circulation Research Classics
    • In This Issue Archive
    • Anthology of Images
  • Resources
    • Online Submission/Peer Review
    • Why Submit to Circulation Research
    • Instructions for Authors
    • → Article Types
    • → Manuscript Preparation
    • → Submission Tips
    • → Journal Policies
    • Circulation Research Awards
    • Image Gallery
    • Council on Basic Cardiovascular Sciences
    • Customer Service & Ordering Info
    • International Users
  • AHA Journals
    • AHA Journals Home
    • Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology (ATVB)
    • Circulation
    • → Circ: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • → Circ: Genomic and Precision Medicine
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Imaging
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Interventions
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes
    • → Circ: Heart Failure
    • Circulation Research
    • Hypertension
    • Stroke
    • Journal of the American Heart Association
  • Impact Factor 13.965
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

  • My alerts
  • Sign In
  • Join

  • Advanced search

Header Publisher Menu

  • American Heart Association
  • Science Volunteer
  • Warning Signs
  • Advanced Search
  • Donate

Circulation Research

  • My alerts
  • Sign In
  • Join

  • Impact Factor 13.965
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Home
  • About this Journal
    • Editorial Board
    • Meet the Editors
    • Editorial Manifesto
    • Impact Factor
    • Journal History
    • General Statistics
  • All Issues
  • Subjects
    • All Subjects
    • Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research
    • Critical Care and Resuscitation
    • Epidemiology, Lifestyle, and Prevention
    • Genetics
    • Heart Failure and Cardiac Disease
    • Hypertension
    • Imaging and Diagnostic Testing
    • Intervention, Surgery, Transplantation
    • Quality and Outcomes
    • Stroke
    • Vascular Disease
  • Browse Features
    • Circulation Research Profiles
    • Trainees & Young Investigators
    • Research Around the World
    • News & Views
    • The NHLBI Page
    • Viewpoints
    • Compendia
    • Reviews
    • Recent Review Series
    • Profiles in Cardiovascular Science
    • Leaders in Cardiovascular Science
    • Commentaries on Cutting Edge Science
    • AHA/BCVS Scientific Statements
    • Abstract Supplements
    • Circulation Research Classics
    • In This Issue Archive
    • Anthology of Images
  • Resources
    • Online Submission/Peer Review
    • Why Submit to Circulation Research
    • Instructions for Authors
    • → Article Types
    • → Manuscript Preparation
    • → Submission Tips
    • → Journal Policies
    • Circulation Research Awards
    • Image Gallery
    • Council on Basic Cardiovascular Sciences
    • Customer Service & Ordering Info
    • International Users
  • AHA Journals
    • AHA Journals Home
    • Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology (ATVB)
    • Circulation
    • → Circ: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • → Circ: Genomic and Precision Medicine
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Imaging
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Interventions
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes
    • → Circ: Heart Failure
    • Circulation Research
    • Hypertension
    • Stroke
    • Journal of the American Heart Association
Editorial

JNK Bond Regulation

Why Do Mammalian Hearts Invest in Connexin43?

Ralph J. Barker, Robert G. Gourdie
Download PDF
https://doi.org/10.1161/01.RES.0000036861.37203.2F
Circulation Research. 2002;91:556-558
Originally published October 4, 2002
Ralph J. Barker
From the Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert G. Gourdie
From the Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Jump to

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
Loading
  • human
  • gap junction
  • disease
  • c-Jun N-terminal kinase
  • transgenic

Large numbers of gap junctions interconnect working myocytes in the ventricle of adult humans.1–5⇓⇓⇓⇓ Until recently, it was assumed that the reason for the abundance of these clusters of intercellular channels was straightforward. This phenomenon was thought to be principally a matter of ensuring that action potentials were conducted efficiently from myocyte to myocyte.6–8⇓⇓ However, it has long been known that the mammalian heart is atypical with respect to that of other vertebrates in the high frequency and large size of gap junctions found between its constituent muscle cells.1–5,9,10⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓ In nonmammalian chordates ranging from the affixed sea-squirt10 to the nimble sparrow,9 spread of activation is expedited and maintained in the main pumping chamber of the heart with only a fraction of the channels that are apparently required in humans.

The molecular composition of gap junction channels in the adult mammalian ventricle is also a phylogenetic oddity. By far, the most abundantly expressed subunit protein of the numerous gap junctions found in this tissue is connexin43 (Cx43),1–8,10,11⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓ a member of the connexin family of proteins that is probably all but absent from the mature cardiac muscle of other species on the vertebrate family tree.10 Thus, of the many species and classes of animal within our phylum, we mammals seem literally to be out on a limb in terms of the characteristics of the electrotonic couplings linking our ventricular muscle cells.

In addition to being expressed at high levels in the mammalian ventricle, significant resources are allocated to regulation of the trafficking, assembly, sarcolemmal distribution, and turnover of Cx43. For example, over postnatal growth, Cx43 gap junctions undergo remodeling into polarized and precisely organized geometries at intercalated disks12,13⇓—specialized domains of electromechanical coupling between myocytes. The progressive change in coupling geometry occurs in a repeatable and highly choreographed sequence, suggesting close regulation of this developmental process. In a further illustration, the half-life of Cx43 is short, indicative of significant investments in mechanisms ensuring rapid turnover of this protein.14 Perhaps the most striking instance of just how closely Cx43 is tended in the myocardium of mammals is provided by its exquisite sensitivity to pathological disturbance.2,4,6–8,15–28⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓ Localized remodeling of Cx43 gap junction distribution and overall reductions in Cx43 level are common features of ischemic, hypertrophic, and other cardiomyopathic diseases of the heart in humans.2,4–8,15–21⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓ Similarly, there are now numerous reports of acute and long-term disruptions to Cx43 expression, pattern, and phosphorylation in a variety of mammalian models of cardiac disease.6–8,14–18,22–25⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓ Dysregulation of ventricular Cx43 is also frequently observed in studies of mice manipulated by knockout and transgenic techniques in which a connexin gene is not the target.26–28⇓⇓ In many cases, alterations to Cx43 gap junctions provoked by physiological stress, pathological insult, or deleterious genetic manipulation are accompanied by manifest disturbance in the conduction and stability of electrical activation in the heart, including sudden cardiac death from ventricular arrhythmia.

The c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) signal transduction cascade is one of a number of intracellular signaling networks activated by pathological stress in mammalian ventricular myocytes. In this issue of Circulation Research, Petrich and coworkers29 are the first to give evidence that JNK may be a key mediator of the sensitive response of cardiac Cx43 to acute pathological disturbance and chronic disease processes. In a comprehensive piece of work, these authors demonstrate that JNK activation accompanies the downregulation of gap junctional intercellular communication and Cx43 levels in murine ventricular myocytes. To underscore their point, the authors use a range of techniques, from chemical inducers of JNK phosphorylation in cultured cells to ventricular-specific expression of a constitutively active JNK in vitro and in vivo. How the relationship between JNK and Cx43 is orchestrated remains unclear. Based on the close temporal correlation between activation of the kinase and the accompanying rapid decrease in the levels of the gap junction protein, the authors conclude that JNK is most likely involved in regulation of Cx43 at the posttranscriptional level. Whether Cx43 is a direct downstream target of JNK or whether there are multiple steps intervening between activation of JNK and reduction in Cx43 remains to be discerned. It is nonetheless noteworthy that increases in phosphorylation of Cx43 over a similar time course have previously been reported to accompany the loss of cell membrane localized gap junctions in different cell types, including rodent ventricular myocytes.30,31⇓

In terms of explaining a pathogenic response, the contribution by these authors makes a lot of sense. Their conclusion that JNK is “… an important mediator of stress-induced Cx43 downregulation and impaired intercellular communication in the failing heart” (page 640)29 appears to have merit. However, to return to the broader issues concerning Cx43 raised earlier, one has to ask just what (if any) are the advantages of myocardial Cx43? Why do mammalian myocytes expend such effort to coordinate and maintain abundant Cx43 gap junctions? The hearts of other species function unerringly with far fewer intercellular channels. Why indeed, do mammals “bother” with this apparently problematic gap junction protein? As Petrich et al29 teach us, there is likely a mechanism primed to see briskly to the disappearance Cx43 at the first sign of trouble. In turn, this downregulation of Cx43 and attendant remodeling of Cx43 gap junctions may eventually cause fatal electrophysiological dysfunction of the heart.

Complete answers to the questions posed above do not readily suggest themselves and perhaps it is an accident of nature that mammalian hearts express Cx43. However, there is further information that may begin to clarify these issues. Homozygous knockout of the Cx43 gene in mice is lethal at birth owing to obstruction of pulmonary outflow from the right ventricle.32 Interestingly, this fatal cardiac defect appears to result mainly from loss of Cx43 function in nonmyocardial tissues. Namely, in the coordinate and directed migration of motile cohorts, such as epicardially derived cells and neural crest immigrating, into the developing heart.6,33,34⇓⇓ Thus, expression of Cx43 by the myocytes themselves does not seem to be essential for cardiac development (at least in the prenatal mouse), although knockout of Cx43 does measurably influence the rate and reliability of activation spread in ectopically paced and isolated hearts.35

Studies of mice in which Cx43 has been conditionally knocked-out of cardiac lineages provide further unexpected evidence that we may have underestimated the subtleties of connexin function.36 Mice with cardiac-specific knockout of Cx43 are born live without the heart defect seen in the germline knockout animal—reinforcing the concept that Cx43 in cardiac muscle cells does not play a major role in cardiac morphogenesis. Moreover, a good number of the conditionally targeted animals (homozygous for deletion of Cx43) remain postnatally viable for weeks after birth. The myocardial cellular structure and contractile function of these surviving Cx43 mutants appears to remain largely intact, although the rate of activation spread in the ventricles is somewhat slower than that of wild-type littermates. Nonetheless, this modest reduction in propagation velocity of action potential does not correspond to what would have been anticipated from a catastrophic loss of 95% or more of the gap junctional structures coupling ventricular myocytes. In 20/20 hindsight, the precedence set by lower vertebrate animals should have perhaps alerted us to the likely outcome of cardiac-specific targeting of Cx43 in mouse. Importantly, however, these mutant mice do succumb increasingly with postnatal age to sudden cardiac death from ventricular arrhythmias. Thus, although abundant gap junctions composed of Cx43 may not be necessary for intercellular conduction of cardiac action potential from beat-to-beat in mammals, these intercellular junctions may be a necessary “safety factor” for the long-term stability of ventricular activation. The nagging issues nonetheless remain. Why do nonmammals not require the putative “safety factor” conveyed by high expression of Cx43? Why do mammals quickly ditch and then not reestablish at the same level this safety factor after the very circumstances (ie, after pathological disturbance) in which it would seem to serve its most useful purpose? Does this paradox suggest additional roles for Cx43 that are independent of intercellular coupling as suggested by Lo and colleagues?34 No doubt further understanding of how intracellular pathways such as the JNK signaling cascade are activated in cardiac development, health, and disease may provide answers to some of these questions.

Footnotes

  • The opinions expressed in this editorial are not necessarily those of the editors or of the American Heart Association.

References

  1. ↵
    Gourdie RG, Severs NJ, Green CR. Gap junction distribution in adult mammalian myocardium revealed by an anti-peptide antibody and laser scanning confocal microscopy. J Cell Sci. 1991; 99: 41–55.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Smith JH, Green CR, Peters NS, Rothery S, Severs NJ. Altered patterns of gap junction distribution in ischemic heart disease. An immunohistochemical study of human myocardium using laser scanning confocal microscopy. Am J Pathol. 1991; 139: 801–821.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    Davis LM, Rodefeld ME, Green K, Beyer EC, Saffitz JE. Gap junction protein phenotypes of the human heart and conduction system. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1995; 6: 813–822.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Severs NJ. The cardiac muscle cell. Bioessays. 2000; 22: 188–199.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Gros DB, Jongsma HJ. Connexins in mammalian heart function. Bioessays. 1996; 18: 719–730.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Gourdie RG, Lo CW. Cx43 gap junctions in cardiac development and disease.In: CPerrachia, ed. Current Topics in Membranes: Gap Junctions, vol 49. New York, NY: Academic Press; 2000: 581–602.
  7. ↵
    Spray DC, Suadciani M, Srinivas M, Gutstein DE, Fishmann GI. Gap junctions of the cardiovascular system.In: Page E, Fozzard HA, Solaro J, eds. Handbook of Physiology: The Cardiovascular System: The Heart. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2002: 169–212.
  8. ↵
    Kleber AG, Janse MJ, Fast VG. Normal and Abnormal Conduction in the Heart.In: Page E, Fozzard HA, Solaro J, eds. Handbook of Physiology: The Cardiovascular System: The Heart. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2002: 455–530.
  9. ↵
    Shibata Y, Yamamoto T. Freeze-fracture studies of gap junctions in vertebrate cardiac muscle cells. J Ultrastruct Res. 1979; 67: 79–88.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    Becker DL, Cook JE, Davies CS, Evans WH, Gourdie RG. Expression of major gap junction connexin types in the working myocardium of eight chordates. Cell Biol Int. 1998; 22: 527–543.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    Beyer EC, Paul DL, Goodenough DA. Connexin43: a protein from rat heart homologous to a gap junction protein from liver. J Cell Biol. 1987; 105: 2621–2629.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    Angst BD, Khan LU, Severs NJ, Whitely K, Rothery S, Thompson RP, Magee AI, Gourdie RG. Dissociated spatial patterning of gap junctions and cell adhesion junctions during postnatal differentiation of ventricular myocardium. Circ Res. 1997; 80: 88–94.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    Kostin S, Hein S, Bauer EP, Schaper J. Spatiotemporal development and distribution of intercellular junctions in adult rat cardiomyocytes in culture. Circ Res. 1999; 85: 154–167.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    Beardslee MA, Laing JG, Beyer EC, Saffitz JE. Rapid turnover of connexin43 in the adult rat heart. Circ Res. 1998; 83: 629–635.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    Spach MS. Discontinuous cardiac conduction: its origin in cellular connectivity with long-term adaptive changes that cause arrhythmias. In: Soonper PM, Joyner RW, Jalife J, eds. Discontinuous Conduction in the Heart. New York, NY: Futura Publishing Company, Inc; 1997: 5–51.
  16. ↵
    Peters NS, Wit AL.. Gap junction remodeling in infarction: does it play a role in arrhythmogenesis? J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2000; 11: 488–490.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. ↵
    Kanno S, Saffitz JE. The role of myocardial gap junctions in electrical conduction and arrhythmogenesis. Cardiovasc Pathol. 2001; 10: 169–177.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Severs NJ, Rothery S, Dupont E, Coppen SR, Yeh HI, Ko YS, Matsushita T, Kaba R, Halliday D. Immunocytochemical analysis of connexin expression in the healthy and diseased cardiovascular system. Microsc Res Tech. 2001; 52: 301–322.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    Peters NS, Green CR, Poole-Wilson PA, Severs NJ. Reduced content of connexin43 gap junctions in ventricular myocardium from hypertrophied and ischemic human hearts. Circulation. 1993; 88: 864–875.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    Sepp R, Severs NJ, Gourdie RG. Altered patterns of cardiac intercellular junction distribution in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Heart. 1996; 76: 412–417.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    De Mello WC. Cell coupling and impulse propagation in the failing heart. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1999; 10: 1409–1420.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. ↵
    Luke RA, Saffitz JE. Remodeling of ventricular conduction pathways in healed canine infarct border zones. J Clin Invest. 1991; 87: 1594–1602.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    Matsushita T and Takamatsu T. Ischaemia-induced temporal expression of connexin43 in rat heart. Virchows Archiv. 1997; 431: 453–458.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    Peters NS, Coromilas J, Hanna MS, Josephson ME, Costeas C, Wit AL. Characteristics of the temporal and spatial excitable gap in anisotropic reentrant circuits causing sustained ventricular tachycardia. Circ Res. 1998; 82: 279–293.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    Beardslee MA, Lerner DL, Tadros PN, Laing JG, Beyer EC, Yamada KA, Kleber AG, Schuessler RB, Saffitz JE. Dephosphorylation and intracellular redistribution of ventricular connexin43 during electrical uncoupling induced by ischemia. Circ Res. 2000; 87: 656–662.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    Kasahara H, Wakimoto H, Liu M, Maguire CT, Converso KL, Shioi T, Huang WY, Manning WJ, Paul D, Lawitts J, Berul CI, Izumo S. Progressive atrioventricular conduction defects and heart failure in mice expressing a mutant Csx/Nkx2.5 homeoprotein. J Clin Invest. 2001; 108: 189–201.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    Hall DG, Morley GE, Vaidya D, Ard M, Kimball TR, Witt SA, Colbert MC. Early onset heart failure in transgenic mice with dilated cardiomyopathy. Pediatr Res. 2000; 48: 36–42.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  28. ↵
    Nakamura K, Robertson M, Liu G, Dickie P, Nakamura K, Guo JQ, Duff HJ, Opas M, Kavanagh K, Michalak M. Complete heart block and sudden death in mice overexpressing calreticulin. J Clin Invest. 2001; 107: 1245–1253.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    Petrich BG, Gong X, Lerner DL, Wang X, Brown JH, Saffitz JE, Wang Y. c-Jun N-terminal kinase activation mediates downregulation of connexin43 in cardiomyocytes. Circ Res. 2002; 91: 640–647.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    Barker RJ, Price RL, Gourdie RG. Increased association of ZO-1 with connexin43 during remodeling of cardiac gap junctions. Circ Res. 2002; 90: 317–324.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    Kang KS, Yun JW, Yoon B, Lim YK, Lee YS. Preventive effect of germanium dioxide on the inhibition of gap junctional intercellular communication by TPA. Cancer Lett. 2001; 166: 147–153.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    Reaume AG, de Sousa PA, Kulkarni S, Langille BL, Zhu D, Davies TC, Juneja SC, Kidder GM, Rossant J. Cardiac malformation in neonatal mice lacking connexin43. Science. 1995; 267: 1831–1834.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    Li WE, Waldo K, Linask KL, Chen T, Wessels A, Parmacek MS, Kirby ML, Lo CW. An essential role for connexin43 gap junctions in mouse coronary artery development. Development. 2002; 129: 2031–2042.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  34. ↵
    Xu X, Li WE, Huang GY, Meyer R, Chen T, Luo Y, Thomas MP, Radice GL, Lo CW. Modulation of mouse neural crest cell motility by N-cadherin and connexin 43 gap junctions. J Cell Biol. 2001; 154: 217–230.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    Vaidya D, Tamaddon HS, Lo CW, Taffet SM, Delmar M, Morley GE, Jalife J. Null mutation of connexin43 causes slow propagation of ventricular activation in the late stages of mouse embryonic development. Circ Res. 2001; 88: 1196–1202.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    Gutstein DE, Morley GE, Tamaddon H, Vaidya D, Schneider MD, Chen J, Chien KR, Stuhlmann H, Fishman GI. Conduction slowing and sudden arrhythmic death in mice with cardiac-restricted inactivation of connexin43. Circ Res. 2001; 88: 333–339.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

Circulation Research
October 4, 2002, Volume 91, Issue 7
  • Table of Contents
Previous ArticleNext Article

Jump to

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics

Article Tools

  • Print
  • Citation Tools
    JNK Bond Regulation
    Ralph J. Barker and Robert G. Gourdie
    Circulation Research. 2002;91:556-558, originally published October 4, 2002
    https://doi.org/10.1161/01.RES.0000036861.37203.2F

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
  • Article Alerts
    Log in to Email Alerts with your email address.
  • Save to my folders

Share this Article

  • Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Circulation Research.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    JNK Bond Regulation
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from Circulation Research
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the Circulation Research web site.
  • Share on Social Media
    JNK Bond Regulation
    Ralph J. Barker and Robert G. Gourdie
    Circulation Research. 2002;91:556-558, originally published October 4, 2002
    https://doi.org/10.1161/01.RES.0000036861.37203.2F
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

Related Articles

Cited By...

Subjects

  • Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research
    • Myocardial Biology
  • Genetics
    • Gene Expression & Regulation

Circulation Research

  • About Circulation Research
  • Editorial Board
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Abstract Supplements
  • AHA Statements and Guidelines
  • Permissions
  • Reprints
  • Email Alerts
  • Open Access Information
  • AHA Journals RSS
  • AHA Newsroom

Editorial Office Address:
3355 Keswick Rd
Main Bldg 103
Baltimore, MD 21211
CircRes@circresearch.org

Information for:
  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Subscriber Help
  • Institutions / Librarians
  • Institutional Subscriptions FAQ
  • International Users
American Heart Association Learn and Live
National Center
7272 Greenville Ave.
Dallas, TX 75231

Customer Service

  • 1-800-AHA-USA-1
  • 1-800-242-8721
  • Local Info
  • Contact Us

About Us

Our mission is to build healthier lives, free of cardiovascular diseases and stroke. That single purpose drives all we do. The need for our work is beyond question. Find Out More about the American Heart Association

  • Careers
  • SHOP
  • Latest Heart and Stroke News
  • AHA/ASA Media Newsroom

Our Sites

  • American Heart Association
  • American Stroke Association
  • For Professionals
  • More Sites

Take Action

  • Advocate
  • Donate
  • Planned Giving
  • Volunteer

Online Communities

  • AFib Support
  • Garden Community
  • Patient Support Network
  • Professional Online Network

Follow Us:

  • Follow Circulation on Twitter
  • Visit Circulation on Facebook
  • Follow Circulation on Google Plus
  • Follow Circulation on Instagram
  • Follow Circulation on Pinterest
  • Follow Circulation on YouTube
  • Rss Feeds
  • Privacy Policy
  • Copyright
  • Ethics Policy
  • Conflict of Interest Policy
  • Linking Policy
  • Diversity
  • Careers

©2018 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. The American Heart Association is a qualified 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization.
*Red Dress™ DHHS, Go Red™ AHA; National Wear Red Day ® is a registered trademark.

  • PUTTING PATIENTS FIRST National Health Council Standards of Excellence Certification Program
  • BBB Accredited Charity
  • Comodo Secured