Gap Junctions in Vascular Tissues
Evaluating the Role of Intercellular Communication in the Modulation of Vasomotor Tone
Jump to
- Article
- Abstract
- Neuronal Innervation of Vascular Smooth Muscle
- Electrical Properties of Vascular Smooth Muscle
- Intercellular Communication Among Vascular Wall Cells
- Physiological Evidence for a Potentially Important Role of Gap Junctions in Vascular Tissues
- Diffusion of Second Messenger Molecules Through Gap Junction Channels Connecting Vascular Wall Cells
- Modeling Intercellular Communication Mediated by Gap Junctions
- Neuronal Innervation, Signal Transduction, Gap Junctions, and Vascular Tone
- Pathophysiology of Gap Junctions
- Summary and Conclusions
- References
- Figures & Tables
- Info & Metrics
- eLetters

Abstract
Integration and coordination of responses among vascular wall cells are critical to the local modulation of vasomotor tone and to the maintenance of circulatory homeostasis. This article reviews the vast literature concerning the principles that govern the initiation and propagation of vasoactive stimuli among vascular smooth muscle cells, which are nominally the final effectors of vasomotor tone. In light of the abundance of new information concerning the distribution and function of gap junctions between vascular wall cells throughout the vascular tree, particular attention is paid to this integral aspect of vascular physiology. Evidence is provided for the important contribution of intercellular communication to vascular function at all levels of the circulation, from the largest elastic artery to the terminal arterioles. The thesis of this review is that the presence of gap junctions, in concert with the autonomic nervous system, pacemaker cells, myogenic mechanisms, and/or electrotonic current spread (both hyperpolarizing and depolarizing waves through gap junctions), confers a plasticity, adaptability, and flexibility to vasculature that may well account for the observed diversity in regulation and function of vascular tissues throughout the vascular tree. It is hoped that the summary information provided here will serve as a launching pad for a new discourse on the mechanistic basis of the integrative regulation and function of vasculature, which painstakingly accounts for the undoubtedly complex and manifold role of gap junctions in vascular physiology/dysfunction.
Coordination of responses among vascular wall cells is critical to the local modulation of vasomotor tone and to the maintenance of circulatory homeostasis. Because vascular smooth muscle is nominally the final effector of vessel tone, a central thrust of cardiovascular research has been to clarify the regulation and function of smooth muscle cells. However, despite the enormous amount of research that has been conducted, the mechanism(s) permitting coordinated response generation among smooth muscle cells in the vessel wall remains incompletely understood.
Thus, a review of the principles governing initiation and propagation of vasoactive stimuli among vascular smooth muscle cells seems relevant to a better understanding of circulatory control. The main thesis of this review is that although neuronal innervation and electrical excitability play major roles in vascular response generation, they are not the only mechanisms responsible for coordinated vessel tone. Particular emphasis is given to the role of intercellular communication through gap junctions (nexuses) among vascular smooth muscle cells in the regulation of vasomotor tone, although the role of endothelial cell–endothelial cell and endothelial cell–smooth muscle cell gap junctions is also considered. The focused attention on junctional communication in vascular smooth muscle seems justified given the recent and rapid expansion of information concerning the molecular and biophysical properties of gap junctions in these cells. Moreover, the reader should keep in mind that the gap junctional intercellular communication discussed here is distinct from other types of cell-to-cell interaction that are also important to vascular homeostasis, eg, paracrine interactions through the extracellular pathway.
Several contingencies have been identified for syncytial activation of vascular smooth muscle: (1) direct neuronal innervation of every or almost every smooth muscle cell (in this scenario, simultaneous activity of presynaptic nerve fibers would permit the synchronous activation of all cells independent of other mechanisms, ie, analogous to multiunit smooth muscle), (2) the presence of electrically excitable smooth muscle cells such that syncytial tissue responses could be achieved by regenerative electrical events triggered by fewer neuromuscular junctions and further modulated by the activity of pacemaker cells (ie, analogous to unitary smooth muscle organization), and (3) the passive movement of intercellular second messenger molecules/ions through gap junctions from directly activated cells to distally removed coupled cells, subsequent to activation of only a small fraction of smooth muscle cells (ie, a mixture of multiunit and unitary smooth muscle). These possibilities are considered in order.
Neuronal Innervation of Vascular Smooth Muscle
The issue of neuronal innervation of the vasculature is critical to understanding how vasomotor tone might be coordinated. In the present review, the term neuronal innervation refers broadly to any component of the autonomic nervous system that contributes to the perivascular innervation of the systemic vasculature; ie, adrenergic, cholinergic, and nonadrenergic noncholinergic (eg, neuropeptides or nitric oxide) neurons are included in this terminology. Several excellent reviews have documented that the autonomic innervation of systemic blood vessels is largely confined to the adventitial-medial smooth muscle border1 2 3 and rarely penetrates the medial smooth muscle layer, although exceptions have been noted.4 5 6 Despite the large degree of complexity and variability concerning the innervation of both arterial and venous smooth muscle, some generalizations can be made. In particular, as pointed out by Burnstock4 5 and others,1 2 3 the autonomic neuroeffector junction in vascular smooth muscle differs both anatomically and physiologically from the classic neuromuscular junction of skeletal muscle (see Fig 1⇓). Specifically, perivascular nerves coalesce at the adventitial-medial smooth muscle border to form a plexus consisting of an extensive network of branching terminal fibers. The terminal axons in this plexus are commonly devoid of a Schwann cell covering, are rich in varicosities (0.5 to 2 μm in diameter), and are separated by shorter intervaricose regions (0.1 to 0.3 μm in diameter).5 The varicosities are thought to represent the major sites for neurotransmitter release during neuronal activity; because individual axons may have numerous varicosities, impulses passing along an axon would be expected to successively depolarize a string of varicosities.
Depiction of the general anatomic arrangements and structural features of a small muscular artery. Top, Five or six layers of medial smooth muscle are shown to be separated from an endothelium-lined lumen by an internal elastic lamina; note that the internal lamina is depicted as being continuous for simplicity, although this is clearly not the case in vivo. Bottom, The same interrelationships are shown at higher magnification, after sectioning of the vessel in the plane perpendicular to the long axis of the vascular smooth muscle cell (shown as thick black line in the top panel). The thick lines through the media between the adventitial and endothelial (luminal) sides illustrate the bidirectional signaling that might occur in vivo by either the extracellular pathway (the line to the right) or the intercellular pathway (the line to the left).
Neuronal innervation of larger vessels is notably different from that of smaller vessels. For example, neuromuscular distances (which have been reported to range from 50 to 2000 nm), as well as the relative volume of smooth muscle being supplied by perivascular nerves, are usually much greater in large elastic arteries compared with smaller muscular arteries.2 3 4 5 7 In larger vessels, in particular, where there are many layers of smooth muscle (with innervation largely confined to the adventitial-medial smooth muscle border), a majority of the smooth muscle cells may not be directly innervated. In contrast, in small arterioles a larger proportion of smooth muscle cells may be directly innervated. Differential innervation patterns and neuromuscular distances in larger versus smaller blood vessels may have important implications with respect to neurotransmitter diffusion distances and the effective neurotransmitter concentrations achieved at the postsynaptic receptor sites.1 2 3
In light of these anatomic relationships, neurotransmitter diffusion through the medial smooth muscle layer has been presumed to be the principal rate-limiting step required for activation of the smooth muscle cells, especially in progressively larger blood vessels.8 Several studies have examined the movement and disposition of neurotransmitters in the medial smooth muscle layer of blood vessels. For example, “overflow” of transmitter with histochemical evidence of diffusion to deeper layers of medial smooth muscle has been demonstrated in the dog dorsal pedal artery. Other reports have also indicated that neurotransmitter may diffuse through the medial smooth muscle layer in some blood vessels.2 9 10 11 12 13 Importantly, however, the necessity of the extracellular diffusion pathway to the syncytial activation of vascular smooth muscle has not been unequivocally established.
In contrast, in a very recent study, the kinetics of norepinephrine release from sympathetic nerves was directly measured electrochemically with a carbon fiber electrode in the isolated rat tail artery.14 This report demonstrated that, in this vessel, neurotransmitter diffusion was locally and temporally restricted to the arterial surface, with a time constant of ≤1 second. We conclude that although neural innervation and neurotransmitter activation of vascular smooth muscle clearly do provide an important mechanism for modulating vasomotor tone, there is no compelling evidence that nerve stimulation alone, in the absence of other mechanisms, could activate the majority of smooth muscle cells in the wall of larger elastic and muscular arteries.
Electrical Properties of Vascular Smooth Muscle
The electrical properties of vascular smooth muscle cells have been well characterized both in vitro and in vivo. These cells express a variety of membrane ion channels,15 including K+ channels,16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Ca2+ channels,8 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 and perhaps Cl− channels and Na+ channels as well.35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 Despite the correlation between membrane potential and tension development shown in many vascular tissues, changes in membrane potential are neither necessary nor sufficient to elicit contractile responses in all blood.1 41 44 45 46 47 48 Although a more detailed discussion of the characteristics of the individual membrane ion channels on vascular smooth muscle cells is beyond the focus of the present review, studies to date support the supposition that the majority of smooth muscle does not exhibit action potentials.15 24
Pacemaker Cells and Regenerative Electrical Events in Vascular Smooth Muscle
The initiation, propagation, and modification of contractile responses along blood vessels can clearly occur in the absence of neural modulation, especially in smaller caliber vessels, such as arterioles,49 50 51 52 53 54 55 as well as in larger caliber vessels, such as portal-mesenteric veins.56 In the latter case, “spikelike” potentials were observed to decrementally spread along the vessel at a rate of 1 to 2 cm/s.57 In fact, the presence of “pacemaker” cells has been hypothesized to participate in the initiation and coordination of vasomotor responses in vessels with spontaneous contractile activity.50 51 Thus, although excitatory junction potentials, spikelike potentials, and active membrane responses have been recorded in many blood vessels, particularly in those with spontaneous contractions,39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 these potentials appear to be passively spread59 in situ rather than actively propagated.68 69 70
Electrotonic Current Spread in Vascular Smooth Muscle
Intercellular communication through gap junctions provides the mechanistic basis for strong electrical coupling between smooth muscle cells, so that even relatively small depolarizations can be passively spread over relatively large distances in vascular tissues.1 63 64 For example, neurotransmitter-induced excitatory junction potentials of ≈10 mV have been reported to spread with little attenuation both along the length of the blood vessel and from the adventitial-medial smooth muscle border to the inner smooth muscle layers.1 Additionally, the rapid bidirectional spread of depolarization among vascular smooth muscle cells has been hypothesized to be important to vascular tone in rodents.71 72 The spread of hyperpolarizations of similar magnitude among smooth muscle cells has also been documented in isolated porcine coronary artery.73 Although the physiological relevance of passive current spread in vivo still remains to be demonstrated, as noted above, hyperpolarization and depolarization have been correlated with vascular tissue relaxation and contraction, respectively, in vitro.71 72 73
In fact, such passive current spread in blood vessels with many layers of medial smooth muscle is an important concept. For example, in larger vessels the space constant λ was observed to be much greater in the direction parallel to the blood vessel (as large as 1.5 to 3.0 mm) than in the direction perpendicular to the blood vessel (λ=≈0.1 mm)1 63 64 As a result of such anisotropy, the characteristics of electrotonic current flow will vary dramatically with the thickness and function of the vessel (Fig 2⇓). Presumably, anisotropic space constants for current flow between smooth muscle cells are ascribable to tissue geometry and the distribution of gap junctions among vascular smooth muscle cells. The example that follows will serve to illustrate the potential significance of anisotropic electrotonic current spread in vascular tissues. Specifically, let us calculate the size of an “active vascular unit,” which we will arbitrarily define as the number of cells within one space constant of the stimulated cell. Taking into account the aforementioned electrical anisotropy, as well as the geometry (width, 5 to 10 μm; length, 100 μm) and orientation (long axis of the smooth muscle cell largely perpendicular to the long axis of the blood vessel) of smooth muscle cells in the vessel wall (see Fig 2⇓, bottom), the “active vascular unit” would clearly be very dependent on tissue geometry. In any case, because junctional permeability is an order of magnitude less than cytoplasmic diffusion, current flow will always be much greater along the long axis of the smooth muscle cell than perpendicular to the long axis of the cell. As such, depending on whether vessel geometry approximates a one-, two-, or three-dimensional case, the number of cells in the “active vascular unit” could range from a minimum of tens of cells to a maximum of hundreds of cells.74 75 Such large “active vascular units” have potentially important implications for vascular physiology (see below). However, the actual physiological relevance of such a phenomenon in situ remains to be determined but is amenable to both theoretical analysis and experimental verification.
Depiction of the general anatomic arrangements and structural features of a small muscular artery. Top, Five or six layers of medial smooth muscle are shown to be separated from an endothelium-lined lumen by an internal elastic lamina; note that the internal lamina is depicted as being continuous for simplicity, although this is clearly not the case in vivo. Bottom, Anisotropic intercellular communication is shown in blood vessels by a schematic diagram of the anisotropic character of intercellular diffusion. This panel depicts the expected orientation of the smooth muscle cells in the vessel wall after a sectioning of the vessel in a plane longitudinal to the long axis of the blood vessel, near the adventitial surface, where one might expect to find neuronal varicosities. This diagram illustrates the physical principles that may underlie the differential space constants observed for the passive spread of small depolarizations in the vessel wall in the planes that are parallel and perpendicular to the long axis of the blood vessel, respectively (see text). Thus, the anisotropic nature of intercellular diffusion may be related to the fact that cytoplasmic diffusion is an order of magnitude greater than junctional diffusion. Thus, the fewer junctional interfaces that must be traversed, the greater the effective intercellular diffusion distance.
Intercellular Communication Among Vascular Wall Cells
The possibility that an intercellular pathway between adjacent smooth muscle cells may be relevant to tissue physiology dates back to the discovery of the gap junction (or nexus) in canine intestine by Barr and Dewey.76 Shortly thereafter, Johansson and Ljung56 suggested that myogenic intercellular propagation might similarly be important for signal spread in vasculature. In light of the many recent advances made in the understanding of the molecular and biophysical properties of gap junctions, the emphasis here will be on presenting the new experimental and theoretical evidence for the long suspected role of the nexus in vascular response generation. Presently, we review data that suggest that the presence of gap junctions between vascular wall cells in diverse vasculature (see Table 1⇓) provides an anatomic substrate by which activation of only a small fraction of the total cell population might lead to rapid coordinated contractions.
Expression of Connexins in Vascular Smooth Muscle
Defining Gap Junctions
Gap junctions are aggregates of intercellular channels, with each channel being formed by the union across the extracellular space of two hemichannels or connexons, one contributed by each cell of a pair (Fig 3⇓). The connexons are generally believed to be hexameric complexes of homologous connexin proteins. A dozen individual cDNAs encoding distinct mammalian connexin proteins have been cloned and sequenced and are named according to their predicted molecular weights.77 78 Connexins show overlapping tissue-specific patterns of expression79 ; three connexins, Cx43, Cx40, and Cx37, are expressed in vascular wall cells. As summarized in Tables 1 and 2⇑⇓, Cx43 and in some cases Cx40 are found in both smooth muscle and endothelial cells, with the presence of a third connexin, Cx37, also reported in endothelial cells. Thus, these intercellular channels provide an intercellular conduit through which ions and second messenger molecules may diffuse among vascular wall cells.
Schematic diagram of the salient features of two representative gap junction channels. This diagram highlights the fact that many physiologically relevant second messenger molecules or ionic species are gap junction permeant.
Expression of Connexins in Endothelial Cells
Gap Junctions in the Cardiovascular System
In many tissues, including the heart, the physiological significance of intercellular communication in mediating conduction of ionic currents has been well established.67 77 80 81 82 A similar role for gap junctions in modulating vasomotor tone has long been suspected. In fact, the structural basis for gap junctions and their physiological correlates in vasculature have been studied for almost three decades4 5 7 56 83 84 85 86 87 88 and in the past few years have been complemented by experimental studies demonstrating their potential physiological relevance.1 71 72 73 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 The focus here is on research conducted in arterial smooth muscle and endothelium of the systemic vasculature, ranging from the largest conduit arteries (eg, aorta), to smaller supplying arteries (eg, carotid or superior mesenteric arteries), down to arterioles. In addition, research on the venous system is considered occasionally for comparison.
Immunochemical and Molecular Biological Characterization of Gap Junctions Between Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells
As summarized in Table 1⇑, immunochemical and molecular biological studies at both the cellular and intact tissue levels have indicated the presence of connexins in vascular smooth muscle from a wide range of blood vessels. Electron microscopy has further revealed that the diameter of junctional plaques between smooth muscle cells in the human corpus cavernosum and rat aorta in vivo ranges between 0.2 and 0.5 μm.89 99 In addition, immunogold staining with Cx43 antibodies revealed that the density of staining (expressed as the number of gold particles/μm2) in these same preparations is similar to that found in heart (≈30 gold particles/μm2), another cardiovascular tissue in which Cx43 is the predominant gap junction protein.89 Immunofluorescence studies have also recently detected junctional plaques of similar size (≈0.5 μm) between vascular smooth muscle cells in rat and hamster resistance arteries, using both Cx43 and Cx40 antibodies.102 The immunostaining of these resistance vessels revealed a ubiquitous distribution of both connexins among the vascular smooth muscle cells. Furthermore, the overlapping patterns of immunofluorescence suggested the possibility that Cx40 and Cx43 might be colocalized to the same junctional plaques, even though these connexins do not appear to be functionally paired.105 106
Vascular smooth muscle cells in vivo and in vitro thus appear to be interconnected by an extensive network of relatively small gap junction assemblies. Since both Cx43 and Cx40 appear to be prominent gap junction proteins found interconnecting vascular smooth muscle cells, it is conceivable that their distribution and location among vascular wall cells may confer important physiological properties to distinct vasculature.
Immunocytochemical and Molecular Biological Characterization of Gap Junctions Between Endothelial Cells
As summarized in Table 2⇑, there are some important distinctions between the gap junctions found in endothelial cells and those found in vascular smooth muscle cells. Perhaps most notably, in addition to Cx43 and Cx40, endothelial cells also frequently express the gap junction protein Cx37. Consistent with the presence of additional junctional proteins in endothelial cells, semiquantitative immunochemical studies of rat aorta have revealed that the density of Cx43 immunogold labeling of gap junctions is much lower for junctional plaques between endothelial cells (≈9 gold particles/μm, authors' unpublished data, 1996) than for those between smooth muscle cells (≈30 gold particles/μm; see above), although the sizes of the junctional plaques were similar. Another recent report in rat and hamster resistance vessels used immunofluorescence techniques to demonstrate that Cx40 and Cx43 were distributed throughout the endothelial layer and also appeared to be colocalized to the same junctional plaques. The size of the junctional plaques detected between the endothelial cells in these rodent resistance vessels was nearly twice the size of junctional plaques composed of the same connexins detected between smooth muscle cells (ie, 0.9 versus 0.5 μm). It remains to be determined whether these apparent differences in plaque size are physiologically significant.
Histological Evidence for Gap Junctions Between Endothelial Cells and Smooth Muscle Cells
Myoendothelial gap junctions in arteries result from smooth muscle cell processes passing through fenestrae of the elastica interna to contact endothelial cells and may provide an efficient pathway for the direct transfer of low-molecular-weight molecules from endothelial cells to smooth muscle cells. However, in contrast to the situation concerning smooth muscle cell–smooth muscle cell and endothelial cell–endothelial cell gap junctions, immunocytochemical evidence for the presence of connexins at endothelial cell–smooth muscle cell junctions is not yet available. Nonetheless, ultrastructural evidence of gap junctions between endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells has been reported by several authors,90 93 107 108 109 110 111 and some recent studies do provide strong functional evidence for their existence.73 101 102 104 Clearly, the physiological significance, if any, of myoendothelial gap junctions remains to be determined.
Physiological Evidence for a Potentially Important Role of Gap Junctions in Vascular Tissues
Thus far, a preponderance of morphological, structural, and molecular biological evidence has identified gap junctions between vascular wall cells throughout the vascular tree. At this point, it is relevant to review the experimental findings indicating that their disposition in the vessel wall is physiologically significant.
Possible Functional Roles for Gap Junctions in the Microcirculation
In this regard, it has been suggested that intercellular communication through gap junctions between smooth muscle and/or endothelial cells mediates the vasodilation and vasoconstriction responses observed to be conducted along the arteriolar wall in resistance vessels.92 100 103 One implication of such observations is that intercellular communication in the microcirculation provides a mechanism by which locally triggered vasodilatory responses can be conducted proximally (ie, upstream from the site of stimulation) into the feeding arteriole to induce increased blood flow into the stimulated vessel and thus increase perfusion of a more distal capillary bed.92 100 103 Such conducted vasomotor responses might play an important role in modulating the metabolically mediated hemodynamic responses characteristic of exercise. In fact, Duling and Berne112 were the first to suggest that dilation along arterioles might play an important role in the local control of tissue blood flow and that intercellular communication through gap junctions between vascular wall cells (ie, smooth muscle and/or endothelial cells) is one mechanism that would permit such coordinated hemodynamic responses. Another recent study demonstrated that pressure changes in isolated arterioles were communicated to neighboring portions of the microcirculation.113 That is, a pressure change within an isolated segment of arteriole in situ elicited a myogenic response in the isolated segment as well as changes in arteriolar diameter at locations remote from the isolated segment, which were themselves insulated from the applied pressure changes.113
Other in situ evidence for metabolic coupling among vascular wall cells derives from recent studies in which tracers of various sizes and charges were used to assess the extent of intercellular communication among endothelial cells, among smooth muscle cells, and between endothelial and smooth muscle cells in hamster cheek pouch arterioles.102 104 These studies demonstrated that intracellular microinjection of junction-permeant dyes in vascular wall cells was always heptanol sensitive (ie, disruption of junctional communication with this lipophilic uncoupling agent prevented dye transfer [see below]). In short, these fluorescence studies were indicative of homologous coupling among both endothelial and smooth muscle cells but unidirectional, or asymmetric, heterologous intercellular communication from endothelial to smooth muscle cells. Because of the composition of connexins that exist in these two cell types (compare Tables 1 and 2⇑⇑) and because the tracers used have size and charge characteristics similar to those of known intracellular second messengers, these findings may have important implications for intercellular signaling in the vessel wall. Alternatively, the inherent volume mismatch between endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells, as well as potential artifacts arising from variations in the threshold for optical detection of fluorescent dye transfer, may also account for the observed asymmetries in junctional dye transfer.
Nevertheless, taken together, such observations suggest that longitudinal intercellular diffusion perpendicular to the long axis of the arteriolar smooth muscle cell, or coupling among endothelial cells, might account for both the coordination of metabolically initiated conducted vasomotor responses as well as the rapid myogenic propagation that originates from dynamic changes in pressure or the action of a locally released neurotransmitter within smaller blood vessels.1 103 112
Possible Functional Roles for Gap Junctions in Macrovessels
In contrast to the rather compelling evidence for the importance of gap junctions to dynamic coordination of vascular signals at the arteriolar level, the physiological role of intercellular communication in larger arteries, both muscular and elastic, is not as intuitively obvious and has arguably more modest physiological relevance. However, one cannot exclude the possibility that integration of smooth muscle responses in the larger vessels may have some physiological relevance in vivo. For example, gap junctions might play a role in the regulation and function of larger vessels by integrating diverse neural and endothelial signals across the vessel wall. It has been suggested that such a mechanism would be important in modulating the homeostasis of the intervening medial smooth muscle layer5 and would, of course, have particular relevance to vessels with more than a few layers of smooth muscle (see Fig 1⇑). Additionally, from a conceptual and theoretical standpoint, pharmacological studies of isolated vascular tissues, conducted under well-defined experimental conditions, provide an important opportunity to further study the contribution of intercellular communication to pharmacomechanical coupling and response generation (ie, both contraction and relaxation) in vasculature.
Physiological Evaluation of the Role of Gap Junctions in Larger Blood Vessels
As noted by Johansson and Ljung,88 “Since only a limited number of muscle cells are supplied with vasomotor nerve ‘endings,’ as indicated by the confinement of the adrenergic plexus to the outermost media in most vessels, myogenic spread of excitation may markedly increase the effectiveness of the nervous control by recruitment of non-innervated effector cells.” In some elegant experiments conducted more than 20 years ago, Johansson and Ljung56 88 demonstrated that myogenic conduction between the hepatic and mesenteric segments was essential for the effective coordination of the contractile responses of the rat portal vein. Specifically, they convincingly demonstrated that myogenic conduction was responsible for the transfer of neurogenically induced excitation in the mesenteric segment to muscle cells in the hepatic segment that were not directly affected by the adrenergic transmitter. This first demonstrated the potentially important role played by intercellular communication in the vasculature, even in vessels in which some cells have a capacity for action potentials and in which spontaneous contractions are propagated.
Another example of the importance of passive intercellular diffusion to modulation of vascular responses was recently provided by Beny and Pacicca,73 who presented in situ evidence for bidirectional electrical communication between smooth muscle and endothelial cells in the porcine coronary artery. They demonstrated smooth muscle cells hyperpolarized in response to both endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent agents (eg, bradykinin and isoproterenol, respectively).
Pharmacological Evaluation of the Contribution of Gap Junctions to Response Generation in Isolated Vascular Tissues
The aorta is a sparsely innervated and electrically quiescent vascular tissue that may be largely dependent on intercellular communication through gap junctions for coordination of smooth muscle responses.89 Recent experiments have shown that pretreatment of rat aortic rings with heptanol caused a profound and readily reversible diminution in the rate and magnitude of α1-adrenergic contractions, without any detectable nonjunctional effects.34 37 89 95 99 114 115 The interpretation of this experimental observation was that the diminution in adrenergic contractility was related to a reversible disruption of intercellular communication by heptanol. The implication was that not all smooth muscle cells in this tissue were directly activated by exogenously applied drug but rather that only some fraction of cells were directly activated, and the remaining smooth muscle cells were recruited into the contractile response following the intercellular flux of second messenger molecules (eg, inositol trisphosphate or Ca2+). This conclusion was based on the explicit assumption that heptanol, a clearly pleiotropic lipophil, had relatively selective uncoupling actions at the concentrations used in these studies; the facts supporting this supposition have been outlined in great detail in a recent report.116 Other recent studies in rodent resistance arterioles are also consistent with this interpretation.72
Interestingly, a greater heptanol concentration was found to be required to produce a similar diminution in the contractile responses of isolated rat aortic rings to the full α1-adrenergic agonist phenylephrine compared with the partial α1-adrenergic agonist oxymetazoline. This finding suggested that gap junctions may also modulate agonist efficacy.89 116 That is, the lesser sensitivity of phenylephrine to the uncoupling actions of heptanol was presumably related to the ability of phenylephrine to initiate intracellular events that were associated with significantly greater intercellular flux of relevant second messenger molecules/ionic species among coupled smooth muscle cells.117 Notably, additional pharmacological studies conducted on isolated rat aortic rings116 highlight the potential importance of gap junctions to contractile responses elicited by 5-hydroxytryptamine, endothelin-1, and prostaglandin F2α. Such observations indicate that gap junctions may modulate contractile responses following activation of diverse membrane receptor systems.114 115 116 In short, such observations provide strong experimental evidence that gap junctions participate in the modulation of contractile responses in isolated vascular tissues.
Other investigators have used an analogous research strategy, in distinct vasculature, to obtain similar results. In these studies, promotion of gap junction formation by tetraethylammonium was associated with heptanol-reversible increases in myotonic oscillations of rat tail artery at the tissue level. A similar heptanol-reversible enhancement of lucifer yellow dye transfer by tetraethylammonium treatment was seen in cultured mesenteric arterial smooth muscle cells. Last, when isolated tissues were precontracted with phenylephrine, the administration of 300 μmol/L heptanol caused a significant decrease in the magnitude of the acetylcholine-induced relaxation response. These data provide additional evidence that gap junctions participate in the modulation of both contraction and relaxation responses.
Perhaps the strongest evidence implicating a major role for gap junctions in human tissue physiology and function has been obtained in studies conducted on isolated tissue strips and cultured cells derived from corpus cavernosum smooth muscle.34 37 95 99 In these studies, treatment of isolated human corporal smooth muscle strips with heptanol (again, at presumably selective uncoupling concentrations) caused a profound and readily reversible diminution in the rate and magnitude of α1-adrenergic receptor–mediated contractions, in the absence of any detectable nonjunctional effects.34 37 89 95 99 114 115 In this tissue, which has sparse autonomic innervation and little, if any, capacity for regenerative electrical events, intercellular communication through gap junctions has been postulated to provide a primary mechanism for the coordination of relaxation and contraction responses among the smooth muscle cells. Such intercellular communication is thought to be important in orchestrating the complex hemodynamic events associated with human penile erection and detumescence, respectively. An important correlate of such observations (in this and other vascular tissues) is that the magnitude of both contraction and relaxation would nominally be related to the number of cells recruited into the functional syncytial unit (see Fig 4⇓). Taken together, all of the aforementioned studies provide evidence that both contraction and relaxation responses in many isolated vascular tissues are modulated, at least in part, by intercellular communication through gap junctions.
Intercellular communication has an impact on both contraction and relaxation responses. Organ bath experiments using the selective uncoupling agent heptanol are consistent with the hypothesis that the degree of vascular smooth muscle contraction and relaxation depends on both the strength of the activating stimulus and the extent of intercellular communication. This figure emphasizes that the magnitude of contraction and relaxation responses would be proportional to the number of activated cells. In all cases, the shaded cells represent activated cells, including both directly activated cells (ie, those nearest the neuronal source cell) and cells recruited into the response after activation by the intercellular transit of second messenger molecules or ions. Top left, A family of tracings (A through D) illustrating the change in tension or contractile force (in arbitrary units from baseline) over time (arbitrary units) as typically seen in vascular tissue in the organ bath chamber upon exogenous addition (arrow) of increasing concentrations of a contractile agent (eg, phenylephrine or norepinephrine; at half-log increments, for example). For each tracing, a corresponding panel (A through D) illustrates the nature of the relationship between cellular activation, intercellular communication, and the magnitude of the contractile or relaxant response. Extrapolating to the in vivo environment, response generation should also be proportionate to the strength of neuronal stimulation (denoted by the increasing size of the electrical stimulus shown in panels A through D). As illustrated, greater agonist concentrations or nerve stimulation result in a greater total number of activated cells (both directly and indirectly) and, thus, a proportionately greater contractile response. Top right, A family of tracings illustrating vascular tissues that are submaximally precontracted (eg, ≈80% of maximum) or under basal sympathetic tone, where addition of a vasorelaxant (arrows in uppermost left and right panels) or activation of endogenous vasorelaxing neurons would be expected to elicit a relaxation response in which the magnitude is stimulus dependent.
Diffusion of Second Messenger Molecules Through Gap Junction Channels Connecting Vascular Wall Cells
The Relevance of Cellular Studies
Most studies with cultured cells suffer from the same intrinsic flaw, which is that not all aspects of the in vivo environment can be faithfully reproduced in culture. However, there is absolutely no question that when appropriately conducted, such studies can provide tremendous insights into the cellular events that modulate tissue physiology. This is especially true if the cellular studies are conducted under carefully defined experimental conditions on short-term cultured or enzymatically dissociated smooth muscle cells, where it has been shown that at least for some vascular smooth muscle cells, many of the physiological, pharmacological, biochemical, and morphological features expected in vivo are conserved in vitro.118 In this regard, much of the newly acquired molecular and biophysical information about gap junctions has necessarily been obtained on cultured or enzymatically dissociated cells. Such mechanistic studies seem justified in light of the likelihood that intercellular communication participates in the modulation of vasomotor tone and the fact that these studies cannot yet be conducted at the whole tissue level. Finally, the resolute intention of cellular studies in vitro is to elucidate the physiological boundary conditions for intercellular communication in vivo. The following discussion concentrates primarily on studies of cultured vascular smooth muscle cells, since these cells are better studied and, furthermore, inherently more stable in culture than endothelial cells.
Characterization of Gap Junction–Mediated Intercellular Communication Among Cultured Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells
Electrophysiological experiments have provided considerable appreciation of the biophysical characteristics of intercellular communication. The dual whole-cell voltage-clamp technique has demonstrated that many types of vascular smooth muscle cells in culture are well coupled by gap junctions,82 91 114 115 with a macroscopic junctional conductance typically between 5 and 20 nS.82 91 114 For cell types containing the gap junctional protein Cx43, treatment of cell pairs with the gap junctional–uncoupling agent halothane allows one to visualize unitary channel events, thus permitting estimation of individual channel conductance values. Alternatively, one can use ionic conditions that favor low levels of coupling such that unitary events can be visualized in the absence of lipophilic uncoupling agents.119 In general, in vascular smooth muscle cell pairs from humans (corpus cavernosum), rats (aortic), and rabbits (aortic, mesenteric, and femoral), both techniques revealed similar weakly voltage-dependent channel sizes of ≈30, 60, and 90 pS, respectively, electrophysiological characteristics consistent with the presence and predominance of Cx43.91 However, A7r5 cells (an embryonic rat aortic cell line) appear to have additional channel sizes, which may reflect the presence of an additional gap junction channel, nominally, Cx40.82 120
Metabolic Coupling Among Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells
Consistent with electrophysiological findings, both current-carrying ions and second messenger molecules (Ca2+ ions and inositol trisphosphate) appear to diffuse through gap junctions between coupled human vascular smooth muscle cells in culture.34 Furthermore, the intercellular diffusion of these second messenger molecules was completely and reversibly blocked by heptanol. The extent of metabolic coupling between adjacent smooth muscle cells has been most frequently studied using gap junction–permeant fluorescent dyes (eg, lucifer yellow, carboxyfluorescein, or fura 2). Such studies have shown significant intercellular coupling among diverse vascular smooth muscle cells82 89 91 114 115 121 122 ; moreover, these observations are consistent with similar experiments recently performed in vivo in resistance vessels.102
The extent of metabolic coupling in cultured cells has also been shown to be altered by vasomodulators. For example, brief exposure of physiologically diverse cultured arterial smooth muscle cells (eg, human coronary, pig coronary, rat aorta, and rat mesentery) to serotonin was shown to increase junctional conductance and fluorescent dye coupling.91 The magnitude of the response and the underlying single-channel behavior varied depending on the vessel of origin. In this regard, one might hypothesize that the release of serotonin from aggregating platelets at vessel areas denuded of endothelium would exacerbate vasospastic phenomena. That is, by increasing junctional permeability, serotonin could significantly increase the number of recruited smooth muscle cells and thus enhance the size of the functional syncytial unit and the magnitude of the contractile response (Fig 4⇑). Such a mechanism might partially explain the ability of serotonin to augment adrenergic vascular tone and underlie its proposed role in the etiology of certain vascular diseases, such as essential hypertension, coronary vasospasm, and Raynaud's disease.123 124 125 126 127
Metabolic studies using cultured pulmonary vascular smooth muscle cells have also shown functional variability in dye coupling. More specifically, Bhattacharya et al121 found that pulmonary arterial smooth muscle was more highly coupled than venous smooth muscle, once again suggesting potentially important physiological differences in the extent of intercellular communication among distinct vascular smooth muscle cell types. Although the mechanism(s) responsible for such differences in intercellular coupling is not known, it is presumably related to quantitative and/or qualitative differences in the connexin(s) present in the different cell types and/or their regulation/function.
Second Messenger Regulation of Junctional Communication Between Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells
Several reports have examined the effects of second messenger molecules on the strength of intercellular coupling in cardiovascular tissues.91 99 115 In short, with respect to events coupled to Ca2+ mobilization and contractility, both modest increases (≈30%)115 and decreases (≈10% to 20%)91 in junctional conductance have been reported in vascular myocytes. Conversely, events coupled to activation of the cAMP pathway and relaxation generally tend to modestly diminish the degree of intercellular communication, as reflected by an ≈20% to 30% decrease in junctional conductance.91 92 Such observations suggest that the permeability of gap junction channels may be dynamically modulated during cellular activation in response to either contractile or relaxant stimulation. For example, in human vascular tissue, the observed changes in junctional conductance were accompanied by significant changes in the frequency distribution of the individual channel conductance values characteristic of Cx43.115 Thus, changes in the distribution of the channel conductances in response to activation of protein kinase A and/or C may have an impact on the extent of intercellular coupling and thus on the level of vascular smooth muscle tone. Such studies clearly underscore the potential complexity of junctional regulation in vascular tissues. However, to put such observations in proper perspective, it is important to point out that the experimentally determined characteristics of these channels indicate that ≈90% to 99% of the junctional channels would have to be closed/inactivated/removed in order to affect physiologically relevant changes in cell-to-cell coupling. Moreover, mathematical modeling predicts that downregulation of intercellular communication is much more likely to be physiologically relevant than upregulation117 (see below). Thus, the physiological relevance, if any, of these modest second messenger–mediated alterations in junctional coupling remains uncertain.
Permselectivity of Gap Junction Channels
A discussion of permselectivity was reserved for last, as it applies more to the biophysical properties of the channels themselves than to the cell type in which they are expressed. Since vascular wall cells express multiple connexins, it is conceivable that cells might modulate or modify the rate of intercellular transfer of specific cytosolic molecules by altering the number and or types of connexins within the membrane. There are a few mammalian connexins, and nonmammalian forms as well, where permselectivity has been determined. The data provide one overwhelming fact: gap junction channels are poorly selective. They are permissive with regard to both cations and anions. This is true for Cx32 and Cx26 in rat cells (anion-to-cation ratio, 0.6),128 human Cx37 studied in transfected N2A cells (anion-to-cation ratio, 0.4),129 chick Cx45 studied in transfected N2A cells (anion-to-cation ratio, ≤0.2),130 and even invertebrate connexins (anion-to-cation ratio, 0.55).131 Although all gap junctions studied are poorly selective, some are more selective than others. Channels with greater anionic permissiveness might well be expected to enhance the efficiency of anionic second messenger diffusion from cell to cell relative to a connexin with lesser permissiveness. Thus, permselectivity and the total number of functional channel types present at any one time, along with their respective gating characteristics, are important parameters to evaluate in any nonexcitable cell type where syncytial behaviors are demonstrated. The smooth muscle and endothelial cells of vasculature are but two examples among many such tissue types.
Modeling Intercellular Communication Mediated by Gap Junctions
Intercellular Diffusion
At this juncture, it seems prudent to codify all of the aforementioned anatomic, pharmacological, molecular, and biophysical information about gap junctions. The goal is to use the available data to generate a model concerning the anticipated role of gap junctions in modulating vasomotor responses that will be amenable to experimental verification. As a starting point, the salient features of gap junctions composed of Cx43 in vascular smooth muscle are summarized in Table 3⇓.
Summary of Physiological Properties of Connexin43-Derived Gap Junction Channels Between Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells
In this regard, the discrete steplike pattern observed for the propagation of Ca2+ waves reported for epithelial and glial cells132 provides a simple system in which to evaluate the characteristics and modulation of intercellular second messenger propagation. Additionally, the architecture of many blood vessels is well described, and this makes them readily amenable to computer modeling analyses89 117 (Fig 5⇓). Thus, the tissue monolayer model originally proposed by Brink and Ramanan133 was used to assess the anticipated intercellular diffusion of second messenger molecules through gap junctions. The predicted intercellular diffusion profile for second messenger molecules/ions through gap junctions between the cells was then compared with the diffusion profile anticipated for the flow of neurotransmitter molecules in the extracellular space around the cells. The modeling studies suggested the following. First, if one assumes passive intercellular diffusion, then the profile for intercellular transit of second messenger molecules between vascular smooth muscles can approximate, but not exceed, the predicted diffusion profile for the drug or neurotransmitter in the extracellular space (Fig 6⇓). In theory, then, the intercellular and extracellular passive diffusion pathways are roughly equivalent. However, experimental studies on isolated vascular tissues indicate that the physiologically important pathway is likely to be the intercellular pathway.34 38 89 95 99 114 115 Moreover, if one takes into account tissue tortuosity factors,134 variations in neuromuscular distances,1 3 5 135 the small amount of neurotransmitter actually released during nervous activity, and the short half-lives of the physiologically relevant neurotransmitters,14 it is clear that the extracellular diffusion profile may fall off much more sharply than depicted (ie, be even steeper). Conversely, there is experimental evidence for the presence of regenerative gap junction–mediated intercellular inositol trisphosphate and/or Ca2+ waves in some cell types,136 including human corporal smooth muscle.34 Taken together, these data seem to suggest that intercellular signals would have larger space constants than extracellular neurotransmitters.
Depiction of how gap junctions might be expected to participate in coordination of vascular responses. For comparative purposes, panel A shows a phase contrast view of a cryostat section of frozen rat aorta, defining the different anatomic regions of this vessel (magnification ×400). Panel B illustrates a model for gap junctional modulation of vascular tone in a small resistance blood vessel with several layers of medial smooth muscle, as described in a recent report.89 The generalized morphology shows axonal processes only at the adventitial-medial smooth muscle border. Thus, only the smooth muscle cells nearest the adventitial surface are near presynaptic nerve terminals (varicosities). Five layers of smooth muscle cells and a monolayer of endothelial cells are illustrated, with the cells interconnected by gap junctions. The outermost cells are directly activated by neurotransmitter released from the synaptic terminal. The shaded region indicates those cells with increased intracellular second messenger concentrations after direct neurotransmitter activation. Second messenger molecules would then diffuse through the cytoplasm and junctional channels into neighboring cells. Since all the cells of the surface are simultaneously activated, diffusion out of this layer into the next can be treated as a one-dimensional diffusion case. In the right panel, modeling intercellular diffusion through gap junctions is shown. At the top of the panel is a comparison of computer-generated curves for intercellular diffusion of second messenger molecules in vascular wall cells with differing junctional permeabilities. As schematically depicted, the three diffusion profiles (A, B, and C) reflect the intercellular diffusion of second messenger molecules from a constant source (cell 1 to as many as five cells distantly removed). The arrows in the diffusion profile emphasize the discontinuous nature of the curves and also highlight the differential intercellular second messenger concentrations expected across the junctional membrane of contiguous cells. For curve B, the junctional permeability is that expected of modestly coupled vascular wall cells (5×10−5 cm/s), whereas curves A (5×10−4 cm/s) and C (5×10−6 cm/s) show the effects of increasing or reducing junctional permeability by 10-fold, respectively. In this regard, recent studies demonstrate that 3- to 10-fold changes in junctional permeability (either upregulation or downregulation) would be expected to be associated with physiologically relevant changes in the number of cells recruited into the functional syncytial unit.125 As shown, cell width was assumed to be 10 μm for these calculations.
Comparison of computer-generated diffusion profiles for extracellular neurotransmitter diffusion (eg, norepinephrine) and intercellular diffusion of stable second messenger molecules (eg, Ca2+, inositol trisphosphate, and cAMP). The continuous line at the top represents the expected diffusion of neurotransmitter in the extracellular space, as described elsewhere.89 The other curve represents the expected intercellular diffusion profile for stable second messenger molecules in a linear series of cells labeled from 1 (top of graph) to 5. In this model, cell 1 is expected to have some arbitrary, but constant, concentration of second messenger molecules due to persistent receptor activation by agonist. Thus, the model depicts the expected passive diffusion of second messenger molecules from cell 1 to as many as five cells distantly removed. The arrows in the diffusion profile emphasize the discontinuous nature of the curves and also highlight the differential intercellular second messenger concentrations expected across the junctional membrane of contiguous cells. The junctional permeability used for this comparison was 5×10−4 cm/s, a junctional permeability characteristic of well-coupled vascular wall cells expressing the gap junction protein connexin43. Note that even though, in theory, the extracellular diffusion pathway might exceed that of the intercellular diffusion profile, the selective uncoupling actions of heptanol in vascular smooth muscle demonstrate that the intercellular pathway is the physiologically relevant one.89
Dynamic Changes in Cell-to-Cell Communication Through Gap Junctions
The discussion so far has centered around the evidence indicating that gap junctions participate in modulating vasomotor tone. The relevant issue is how gap junctions might affect vascular tone. In fact, until recently, there was no theoretical construct for understanding how dynamic changes in the extent of intercellular communication among coupled cells might participate in modulating vascular homeostasis and/or be involved in the pathogenesis of vascular disease (where the term dynamic changes in cell-to-cell communication refers to changes in junctional permeability that occur over the same time course as response generation). In fact, two observations suggested a dynamic role for gap junctions in the modulation of vascular tissue responses: (1) the demonstration of the rapid intercellular transit of physiologically relevant receptor-activated second messenger molecules through gap junctions between coupled cells in culture128 132 137 138 139 140 141 and (2) the fact that junctional permeability can be modulated by those same second messenger molecules to which the channels are freely diffusible.81 91 115 128 138 Thus, as discussed above, permeant second messenger molecules might provide an important link in the coordination of tissue responses by virtue of their ability to recruit cells not directly activated by locally restricted neuronal or endothelial signals as well as by their ability to directly modulate junctional permeability after changes in their own intracellular concentrations. Modeling studies suggested that for the dynamic modulation of junctional communication, downregulation was likely to be much more important than upregulation. These relationships are summarized in Fig 7⇓. Recent patch-clamp studies115 142 have revealed that the mechanistic basis for this observation is related to the relatively high open probabilities and the long mean open times characteristic of Cx43-derived gap junction channels (Table 3⇑).
Three-dimensional graph of the results of a model for the dynamic modulation of connexin43-mediated junctional permeability. The x axis represents the nascent probability (pn) that a channel is open. The y axis is the unitless parameter (C/k1/2) in a log scale, where C represents the concentration of the diffusing substance (ie, second messenger molecule) at the initial time of cellular activation, and k1/2 is the concentration of second messenger at which half of the hemichannels are occupied/phosphorylated by the substance. The z axis is the effective diffusion coefficient; Deff (the effective diffusion coefficient in units of 10−8 cm2/s) is a composite measure of the effects of both diffusion and membrane permeability. The upward-curving sheet is for substances that upmodulate gap junction channels in the junctional plaque (ie, cause an increase in the open probability of the channels), the bottom sheet is for downmodulators, and the sandwiched sheet is for substances that do not modulate gap junction channels. In short, the effects of upregulation and downregulation can be seen over a wide range of physiologically relevant conditions. However, consistent with the known biophysical characteristics of connexin43 (see Table 3⇑), the graph indicates that downregulation is more prominent under more diverse physiological conditions (reproduced with permission125 ).
Neuronal Innervation, Signal Transduction, Gap Junctions, and Vascular Tone
Most recently, in an attempt to more explicitly evaluate the role of gap junctions in vasculature, we have combined our diffusion-based model, which illustrates how dynamic changes in junctional channel patency might affect intercellular messenger–driven processes,117 with another model that attempts to account for the effects of innervation density, geometry of innervation (ie, one-, two-, or three-dimensional), second messenger diffusion/metabolism, and the activity of the autonomic nervous system.74 75
The goal of such a model is to further use computer modeling techniques to explore the interrelationship among innervation density, intercellular communication, and second messenger generation/diffusion and their relationship to vascular physiology. The details of this mathematical model are presented elsewhere,75 but their most important implications for vascular physiology are briefly described below. In short, the model takes into account the following parameters at the single-cell level: (1) the neuronal firing rate, (2) the amount of intracellular second messenger molecule generated per neuronal stimulus, (3) the half-life of the intracellular second messenger molecule, and (4) a dose-response curve that relates the concentration of intracellular second messenger molecule to the macroscopic parameter of interest (eg, shortening [contraction] or lengthening [relaxation] of a smooth muscle cell). Given these single-cell parameters, intercellular spread was accounted for by (1) the cell-to-cell permeability and (2) the density of innervation. The model tracked only the average cumulative macroscopic response over the stimulus period.74 75
Interestingly, the model indicated that for most smooth muscle cells in the vessel wall to contribute to a neurally initiated response (ie, contraction or relaxation), the fractional innervation density (the ratio of nerve to smooth muscle cells) must be between 0.1 and 0.9. Specifically, the model predicts that if <1 in 10 smooth muscle cells received a direct neural stimulus, it would be very difficult to obtain a syncytial vascular smooth muscle response, even if all the cells in the tissue were well coupled by gap junctions. However, the model also indicates that as long as the fractional innervation remained >0.1, there was a wide range of physiologically relevant conditions (ie, changes in neuronal firing rate, junctional permeability, and second messenger level/metabolism and diffusion) over which the presence of gap junctions permits syncytial tissue responses. By definition, then, gap junctions are also likely to confer a significant degree of plasticity to vessel function. Clearly, these ideas have not yet been substantiated in vivo, and further analysis is under way. However, it should be emphasized that the real importance of this type of analysis is to better understand the boundary conditions for the contribution of gap junctions to vascular physiology.
Pathophysiology of Gap Junctions
Given their likely role in the coordination of vascular responses and their sensitivity to modulation by a wide variety of extracellular and intracellular factors, gap junctions may be impacted upon by any form of vascular disease involving perturbations in either the intracellular or extracellular milieu. Thus, it is not surprising that recent evidence from a variety of laboratories suggests that gap junctions play a critical role not only in vascular physiology but perhaps also in vascular disease.89 90 92 95 98 99 101 114 115 143 144
The Role of Smooth Muscle Gap Junctions in Vascular Disease
Although there has been no direct demonstration that gap junctions are involved in the pathogenesis of human vascular disease, there are numerous reasons for suspecting that this might be the case. One good example of this exists in the physiology and pathophysiology of the human erectile response. In fact, all evidence indicates that gap junctions play an obligatory role in coordinating smooth muscle responses in the human corpora.118 145 Thus, it follows naturally that gap junctions are likely to participate, either directly or indirectly, in any alteration in basal corporal smooth muscle tone or in any change in smooth muscle reactivity to pharmacological activation (neuronal and/or hormonal).
Experimental observations are consistent with the hypothesis that gap junctions play a role in heightened adrenergic tone in human corporal tissue.118 Specifically, there is a striking similarity between the increases observed in the rate and magnitude of α1-adrenergic contractility produced by advancing age and disease146 and the diminution in the rate and magnitude of α1-adrenergic contraction produced by the gap junction–uncoupling agent heptanol.95 But how might gap junctions participate in this process?
Once again, some of the potential explanations for our experimental observations have a theoretical basis in the results of computer modeling studies. For example, gap junctions might participate in heightened α1-adrenergic contractility as follows: (1) through an increase in junctional permeability (due to changes in the expression, regulation, and/or distribution of connexins), (2) through a change in the resting and/or stimulated levels of second messengers that are important modulators of intercellular communication (possibly leading to altered regulation of junctional permeability), and (3) through a change in the resting or stimulated levels of important second messenger molecules that have no regulatory effect on junctional communication (ie, increasing the effective intercellular diffusion distance, secondary to an increased driving force). The implications of these alterations are as follows: (1) A smaller fraction of smooth muscle cells would need to be activated to achieve syncytial tissue activation, perhaps accounting for our previously observed age- and disease-related alterations in the sensitivity (EC50, half maximally effective [PE]) of isolated corporal tissue strips to α1-adrenergic receptor.147 (2) A greater number of cells might be recruited into the functional unit, perhaps accounting for our previously observed age-related increase in maximal contraction147 and α1-adrenergic efficacy.148 (3) The rate at which the smooth muscle cells are recruited into the functional unit would be increased, perhaps accounting for our previously observed age- and disease-related increases in the rate constant for onset of contraction.146
Although there are clearly alternative explanations for altered α1-adrenergic contractility, it is conceivable that alterations in intercellular communication among corporal smooth muscle cells may underlie some aspects of erectile dysfunction. As such, altered junctional communication could account, at least in part, for the pathological hemodynamic changes commonly associated with this disease. If these findings are extrapolated to other situations, it seems reasonable to postulate that disrupted homeostasis (either heightened contractility or impaired relaxation, eg, Raynaud's disease, cerebral or coronary vasospasm, or essential hypertension) in any vascular tissue that is wholly or partially dependent on intercellular communication through gap junctions might also be characterized by such altered junctional communication.
Moreover, Watts et al101 have suggested that gap junctional communication in vasculature may be altered in hypertension, as vascular smooth muscle from both animals and humans has been shown to display abnormal contractile oscillations.149 This is consistent with the recent observation that gap junctions may be involved in oscillatory contractions. Furthermore, others143 have provided microscopic evidence that junctional plaques are larger and more numerous in the media of aortic samples from two-kidney, one clip renal hypertensive rats compared with normotensive animals. Grunwald et al144 have also reported an increased abundance and size of gap junctions in vasculature from hypertensive animals.
In conclusion, in addition to altered junctional patency/regulation, it is also time for investigators to consider the impact that age- or disease-related alterations in innervation density, neuronal firing rate, and second messenger level/metabolism/diffusion might have on the extent of intercellular communication and, thus, on syncytial smooth muscle responses. It seems likely that the major importance of gap junctions to vascular physiology/disease lies in the “plasticity” that the presence of these ubiquitously distributed channels is likely to confer to vasculature. Conversely, one might predict that a quite complex series of perturbations in vascular physiology would have to occur in order to disrupt the “safety factor” provided by gap junctions in vasculature. No doubt this is a fertile area for future research.
Summary and Conclusions
The abundance of new information concerning the distribution and function of gap junctions between vascular wall cells throughout the vascular tree points to a major role for intercellular communication in coordinating responses at all levels of the circulation. Thus, it is hypothesized that the presence of gap junctions, in concert with the autonomic nervous system, pacemaker cells, myogenic mechanisms, and/or electrotonic current spread (both hyperpolarizing and depolarizing waves through gap junctions), confers a plasticity, adaptability, and flexibility to vasculature that may well account for the diversity in regulation and function of vascular tissues throughout the vascular tree. This possibility alone highlights the importance of continuing the laborious and technically difficult process of studying the multiple types of gap junction proteins present in blood vessels subserving diverse physiological roles under a variety of different conditions. Despite all the knowledge that has been gained in the past few years, our understanding of the role of intercellular communication in vascular tissue remains incomplete. For example, the optimal microenvironments for in vitro studies of intercellular communication among vascular smooth muscle cells and, in particular, among endothelial cells, have yet to be identified. This is an area of study that is clearly necessary for understanding the true impact of gap junctions on vascular physiology and disease.
However, the availability and development of promising new mathematical (see above) and optical imaging techniques (eg, real-time confocal microscopy) for assessing intercellular communication between vascular wall cells in both isolated tissues and cultured cells provide a clear foundation for producing experimentally testable hypotheses. Finally, it is hoped that the information provided here will serve as a launching pad for a new discourse on the mechanistic basis of integrative regulation and function of vasculature, which painstakingly accounts for the undoubtedly complex and manifold role of gap junctions in vascular physiology/dysfunction.
- Received February 15, 1996.
- Accepted June 4, 1996.
References
- ↵
Hirst GDS, Edwards FR. Sympathetic neuroeffector transmission in arteries and arterioles. Physiol Rev. 1989;69:546-604.
- ↵
Bevan JA, Torok J. Movement of norepinephrine through the media of rabbit aorta. Circ Res. 1970;27:325-331.
- ↵
Gibbins IL, Morris JL, Furness JB, Costa M. Innervation of systemic blood vessels. In: Burnstock G, Griffith SG, eds. Nonadrenergic Innervation of Blood Vessels. Boca Raton, Fla: CRC Press; 1988.
- ↵
Burnstock G. Structure of smooth muscle and its innervation. In: Bulbring E, Brading AF, Jones AW, Tomita T, eds. Smooth Muscle. Baltimore, Md: Williams & Wilkins; 1970:1-69.
- ↵
Burnstock G, Relevic V. Neural-Endothelial Interactions in the Control of Local Vascular Tone. Austin, Tex: RG Landes Co; 1993.
- ↵
Somlyo AP, Somlyo AV. Vascular smooth muscle, I: normal structure, pathology, biochemistry and biophysics. Pharmacol Rev. 1968;20:197-283.
- ↵
Speden RN. Excitation of vascular smooth muscle. In: Bulbring E, Brading AF, Jones AW, Tomita T, eds. Smooth Muscle. Baltimore, Md: Williams & Wilkins; 1970:558-588.
- ↵
Nishimura J, Moreland S, Moreland RS, van Breeman C. Regulation of the Ca2+-force relationship in permeabilized arterial smooth muscle. In: Morel RS, ed. Regulation of Smooth Muscle Contraction. New York, NY: Plenum Publishing Corp; 1991.
- ↵
Tesfamarian B, Cohen RA. Inhibition of adrenergic vasoconstriction by endothelial cell shear stress. Circ Res. 1988;63:720-725.
- ↵
- ↵
Cohen RA, Weisbrod RM. Endothelium inhibits norepinephrine release from adrenergic nerves of rabbit carotid artery. Am J Physiol. 1988;254:H871-H878.
- ↵
- ↵
Maxwell RA, Eckhardt SB, Wastilla WB. Concerning the distribution of endogenous norepinephrine in the adventitial and medi-intimal layers of the rabbit aorta and the capacity of these layers to bind tritiated norepinephrine. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1968;161:34-39.
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
Brayden JE, Nelson MT. Regulation of arterial tone by activation of calcium-dependent potassium channels. Science. 1992;256:533-535.
- ↵
Nelson MT, MacCarron JG, Quayle JM. Ion channels in resistance arteries. In: Bevan JA, Halpern W, Mulvany MJ, eds. The Resistance Vasculature. Tocowa, NJ: Humana Press; 1991.
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
Weston AH, Hamilton TC, eds. Potassium Channel Modulators. London, England: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1992.
- ↵
- ↵
Robertson BE, Schubert R, Hescheler J, Nelson MT. cGMP-dependent protein kinase activates Ca-activated K channels in cerebral artery smooth muscle cells. Am J Physiol. 1993;265:C299-C303.
- ↵
Bolotina VM, Palacino PJ, Cohen RA. Direct effect of nitric oxide on Ca2+-dependent K+ channels in vascular smooth muscle cells. FASEB J. 1994;8:A364. Abstract.
- ↵
Nelson MT, Quayle JM. Physiological roles and properties of potassium channels in arterial smooth muscle. Am J Physiol. 1995;268:C799-C822.
- ↵
Nelson MT, Cheng H, Rubart M, Santana LF, Bonev AD, Knot HJ, Lederer WJ. Relaxation of arterial smooth muscle by calcium sparks. Science. 1995;270:633-637.
- ↵
Sperelakis N, Kuriyama H, eds. Ion Channels of Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells and Endothelial Cells. New York, NY: Elsevier Science Publishing Co; 1991:27-38.
- ↵
- ↵
Kitazawa T, Somlyo AP. Modulation of Ca2+-sensitivity by agonists in smooth muscle. In: Morel RS, ed. Regulation of Smooth Muscle Contraction. New York, NY: Plenum Publishing Corp; 1991.
- ↵
Somlyo AP, Somlyo AV. Smooth muscle structure and function. In: Fozzard HA, ed. The Heart and Cardiovascular System. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Raven Press Publishers; 1992.
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
Rembold CM, Murphy RA. Muscle length, shortening, myoplasmic [Ca2+], and activation of arterial smooth muscle. Circ Res. 1991;66:1354-1361.
- ↵
Worley JF, Quayle JM, Standen NB, Nelson MT. Regulation of single calcium channels in cerebral arteries by voltage, serotonin, and dihydropyridines. Am J Physiol. 1991;261:H1951-H1960.
- ↵
Christ GJ, Moreno AP, Melman A, Spray DC. Gap junction-mediated intercellular diffusion of Ca2+ in cultured human corporal smooth muscle cells. Am J Physiol. 1992;263:C373-C383.
- ↵
- ↵
Takenaka T, Epstein M, Forster H, Landry DW, Iijima K, Goligorsky MS. Attenuation of endothelin effects by a chloride channel inhibitor, indanyloxyacetic acid. Am J Physiol. 1992;262:F799-F806.
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
Kitamura K, Suzuki H, Ito Y, Kuriyama H. Similarity and diversity of electrical activity in vascular smooth muscles. In: Sperelakis N, Wood JD, eds. Frontiers in Smooth Muscle Research. New York, NY: Wiley-Liss; 1990:257-276.
- ↵
- ↵
Chen X-L, Rembold CM. Phenylephrine contracts rat tail artery by one electromechanical and three pharmacomechanical mechanisms. Am J Physiol. 1995;268:H74-H81.
- ↵
Nicoll PA, Webb RL. Vascular pattern and active vasomotion as determiners of flow through minute vessels. Angiology. 1955;6:291-310.
- ↵
Meyer J-U, Lindbom L, Intaglietta M. Coordinated diameter oscillations at arteriolar bifurcations in skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol. 1987;253:H568-H573.
- ↵
Hermsmeyer K. Multiple pacemaker sites in spontaneously active vascular muscle. Circ Res. 1973;33:244-251.
- ↵
- ↵
Johnson PC. The myogenic response. In: Bohr DF, Somlyo AP, Sparks HV, eds. Handbook of Physiology, Section 2: The Cardiovascular System. Baltimore, Md: Williams & Wilkins; 1980:409-442.
- ↵
Siegel G, Hofer HW, Schnalke F, Adler A, Walter A, Koepchen HP. Membrane physiological basis of vascular autorhythmicity: vasomotion and flow modulation in the microcirculation. Prog Appl Microcirc. 1989;15:10-31.
- ↵
Intaglietta M. Wave-like characteristics of vasomotion. Prog Appl Microcirc. 1983;3:83-94.
- ↵
- ↵
Johansson B, Somlyo AP. Electrophysiological and excitation-contraction coupling. In: Bohr DF, Somlyo AP, Sparks HV, eds. Handbook of Physiology, Section 2: The Cardiovascular System. Baltimore, Md: Williams & Wilkins; 1980:301-323.
- ↵
Blennerhassett MG, Kannan MS, Garfield RE. Functional characterization of cell-to-cell coupling in cultured rat aortic smooth muscle. Am J Physiol. 1987;252:C555-C569.
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
Kitamura K, Itoh T, Suzuki H, Ito Y, Kuriyama H. Properties of sympathetic neuromuscular transmission and smooth muscle membranes in vascular beds. Comp Biochem Physiol. 1991;98:181-192.
- ↵
Holman ME, Neild TO, Lang RJ. On the passive properties of smooth muscle. In: Sperelakis N, Wood JD, eds. Frontiers in Smooth Muscle Research. New York, NY: Wiley-Liss; 1990:379-398.
- ↵
Tomita T. Spread of excitation in smooth muscle. In: Sperelakis N, Wood JD, eds. Frontiers in Smooth Muscle Research. New York, NY: Wiley-Liss; 1990:361-373.
- ↵
- ↵
Korbmacher C, Helbig H, Stahl F, Coroneo M, Haller H, Lindschau C, Quass P, Wiederholt M. Continuous membrane voltage recordings in A10 vascular smooth muscle cells: effect of AVP. Am J Physiol. 1989;257:C323-C332.
- ↵
Cole WC, Picone JB, Sperelakis N. Gap junction uncoupling and discontinuous propagation in the heart. Biophys J. 1988;53:908-818.
- ↵
Hille B. Ionic Channels of Excitable Membranes. 2nd ed. Sunderland, Mass: Sinauer Associates Inc; 1992.
- ↵
Hodgkin AL. The Conduction of the Nervous Impulse. Liverpool, England: Liverpool University Press; 1967.
- ↵
Katz B. Nerve, Muscle, and Synapse. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Publishing Co; 1966.
- ↵
Xia J, Duling BR. Electromechanical coupling and the conducted vasomotor response. Am J Physiol. 1995;269:H2022-H2030.
- ↵
Xia J, Duling BR. Cellular pathways of the conducted electrical response in arterioles of hamster cheek pouch in vitro. Am J Physiol. 1995;269:H2031-H2038.
- ↵
Beny J-L, Pacicca C. Bidirectional electrical communication between smooth muscle and endothelial cells in the pig coronary artery. Am J Physiol. 1994;266:H1465-H1472.
- ↵
Christ GJ, Brink PR, Ramanan SV. The impact of innervation density on syncytial responses in tissues containing gap junctions. FASEB J. 1995;9:A913. Abstract.
- ↵
- ↵
Barr L, Dewey MM. Intercellular connection between smooth muscle cells: the nexus. Science. 1962;137:670-672.
- ↵
Hall JE, Zampighi GA, Davis RM, eds. Gap Junctions: Progress in Cell Research, Volume 3. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishing Co; 1993.
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
Barr L, Berger W, Dewey MM. Electrical transmission at the nexus between smooth muscle cells. J Gen Physiol. 1968;52:347-368.
- ↵
- ↵
Spray DC, Moreno AP, Rook M, Christ G, Saez JC, Campos de Carvalho AC, Fishman GI. Cardiovascular gap junctions: gating properties, function and dysfunction. In: Ion Channels in the Cardiovascular Systems. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1994:185-214.
- ↵
Burnstock G, Gannon B, Iwayama T. Sympathetic innervation of vascular smooth muscle in normal and hypertensive animals. Circ Res. 1970;26-27(suppl II):II-5-II-24.
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
Christ GJ, Zhao W, Moss J, Gondre CM, Roy C, Brink PR, Spray DC. Gap junctions modulate tissue contractility and α1-adrenergic agonist efficacy in isolated rat aorta. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1993;266:1054-1065.
- ↵
Larson DM, Haudenschild CC, Beyer EC. Gap junction messenger RNA expression by vascular wall cells. Circ Res. 1990;66:1074-1080.
- ↵
Moore LK, Beyer EC, Burt JM. Characterization of gap junction channels in A7r5 vascular smooth muscle cells. Am J Physiol. 1991;260(Cell Physiol 29):C975-C981.
- ↵
Segal SS, Duling BR. Flow control among microvessels coordinated by intercellular conduction. Science. 1986;234:868-870.
- ↵
Larson DM, Sheridan JD. Intercellular junctions and transfer of small molecules in primary vascular endothelial cultures. J Cell Biol. 1982;92:183-191.
- ↵
- ↵
Christ GJ, Moreno AP, Parker ME, Gondre CM, Valcic M, Melman A, Spray DC. Intercellular communication through gap junctions: a potential role in pharmacomechanical coupling and syncytial tissue contraction in vascular smooth muscle isolated from the human corpus cavernosum. Life Sci. 1991;49:PL-195-PL-200.
- ↵
Blennerhassett MG, Kannan MS, Garfield RE. Functional characterization of cell-to-cell coupling in cultured rat aortic smooth muscle. Cell Physiol. 1987;21:C555-C569.
- ↵
Little TL, Beyer EC, Duling BR. Endothelial and smooth muscle cells of microvessels express connexins 43 and 40 in situ. FASEB J. 1993;2:A893. Abstract.
- ↵
Beny J-L, Connat J-L. An electron-microscopic study of smooth muscle cell dye coupling in the pig coronary arteries. Circ Res. 1992;70:49-55.
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
Little TL, Xia J, Duling BR. Dye tracers define differential endothelial and smooth muscle coupling patterns within the arteriolar wall. Circ Res. 1995;76:498-504.
- ↵
Segal SS. Communication among endothelial and smooth muscle cells coordinates blood flow control during exercise. News Physiol Sci. 1992;7:152-156.
- ↵
Little TL, Beyer EC, Duling BR. Connexin 43 and connexin 40 gap junctional proteins are present in arteriolar smooth muscle and endothelium in vivo. Am J Physiol. 1995;268:H729-H739.
- ↵
White TW, Paul DL, Goodenough DA, Bruzzone R. Functional analysis of selective interactions among rodent connexins. Mol Biol Cell. 1995;6:459-470.
- ↵
Elfgang C, Eckert R, Lichtenberg-Frate H, Butterweck A, Traub O, Klein RA, Hulser DF, Willecke K. Specific permeability and selective formation of gap junction channels in connexin-transfected HeLa cells. J Cell Biol. 1995;129:805-817.
- ↵
- ↵
Davies PF, Ganz P, Diehl PS. Reversible microcarrier-mediated junctional communication between endothelial and smooth muscle cell monolayers: an in vitro model of vascular cell interactions. Lab Invest. 1985;85:710-718.
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
Simionescu M, Simionescu N, Palade GE. Segmental differentiations of cell junctions in the vascular endothelium. J Cell Biol. 1975;67:863-885.
- ↵
Duling BR, Berne RM. Propagated vasodilation in the microcirculation of the hamster cheek pouch. Circ Res. 1970;26:163-170.
- ↵
Rivers RJ. Remote effects of pressure changes in arterioles. Am J Physiol. 1995;268:H1379-H1382.
- ↵
Christ GJ, Brink PR, Davis-Joseph B, Spray DC. Presence and physiological significance of gap junctions in vascular smooth muscle. In: Kanno Y, ed. Gap Junctions: Progress in Cell Research. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishing Co; 1995;4:211-215.
- ↵
Moreno AP, Campos de Carvalho AC, Christ GJ, Spray DC. Gap junctional communication between human corpus cavernosum smooth muscle cells in culture: gating behavior and single channel events. Am J Physiol. 1993;264:C80-C92.
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
Brink PR, Ramanan SV, Christ GJ. Human connexin43 gap junction channel gating: evidence for mode shifts and/or heterogeneity. Am J Physiol. 1996;271:C321-C331.
- ↵
Hirschi KK, Minnich BN, Moore LK, Burt JM. Oleic acid differentially affects gap junction-mediated communication in heart and vascular smooth muscle cells. Am J Physiol. 1993;265:C1517-C1526.
- ↵
Bhattacharya S, Ying X, Bhattacharya J. Intercellular communication in lung vascular myocytes. FASEB J. 1993;1:A330. Abstract.
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
Van Zweiten PA. Pathophysiological relevance of serotonin. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1988;10(suppl 3):S19-S25.
- ↵
Vanhoutte PM. Cardiovascular effects of serotonin. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1987;10(suppl 3):S8-S11.
- ↵
Christ GJ, Jean-Jacques MJ-J. Mutual-effect amplification of contractile responses elicited by simultaneous activation of α1-adrenergic and 5-HT2 receptors in isolated rat aorta. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1991;256:553-561.
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
Veenstra RD, Wang H-Z, Beyer EC, Brink PR. Selective dye and ionic permeability of gap junction channels formed by connexin45. Circ Res. 1994;75:483-490.
- ↵
- ↵
Sneyd J, Charles AC, Sanderson MJ. A model for the propagation of intercellular calcium waves. Am J Physiol. 1994;266:C293-C302.
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
Bevan JA, Su C. Variation of intra- and perisynaptic adrenergic transmitter concentrations with width of synaptic cleft in vascular tissue. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1974;190:30-38.
- ↵
Sneyd J, Wetton BT, Charles AC, Sanderson MJ. Intercellular calcium waves mediated by diffusion of inositol trisphosphate: a two-dimensional model. Am J Physiol. 1995;268:C1537-C1545.
- ↵
Cornell-Bell AH, Finkbeiner SM, Cooper MS, Smith SJ. Glutamate induces calcium waves in cultured astrocytes: long range glial signalling. Science. 1990;247:470-473.
- ↵
- ↵
Saez JC, Connor JA, Spray DC, Bennett MVL. Hepatocyte gap junctions are permeable to the second messenger, inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate, and to calcium ions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989;86:2708-2712.
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
Burt JM, Spray DC. Single-channel events and gating behavior of the cardiac gap junction channel. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988;85:3431-3434.
- ↵
- ↵
Grunwald J, Robenek H, Mey J, Hauss WH. In vivo and in vitro cellular changes in experimental hypertension: electron microscopic and morphometric studies of aortic smooth muscle cells. J Exp Mol Pathol. 1982;36:164-176.
- ↵
- ↵
Christ GJ, Valcic M, Gondre CM, Parker M, Janis M, Schwartz K, Stone BA, Melman A. Kinetic characteristics of α1-adrenergic contractions in human corpus cavernosum smooth muscle. Am J Physiol. 1992;263:H15-H19.
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
-
Bruzzone R, Haefliger JA, Gimlich RL, Paul DL. Connexin40, a component of gap junctions in vascular endothelium, is restricted in its ability to interact with other connexins. Mol Biol Cell. 1993;4:7-20.
-
Reed KE, Westphale EM, Larson DM, Wang HZ, Veenstra RD, Beyer EC. Molecular cloning and functional expression of human connexin37, an endothelial cell gap junction protein. J Clin Invest. 1993;91:997-1004.
-
Moore LK, Burt JM. Gap junction function in vascular smooth muscle: influence of serotonin. Am J Physiol. 1995;269:H481-H489.
-
Gabriel JE, Paul DL. Characterization of connexin expression in rat aortic endothelial cells during in vitro wounding. Mol Biol Cell. 1993;4:329a. Abstract.
-
Giraldi A, Wen Y, Geliebter J, Christ GJ. Altered gap junction (connexin43) mRNA expression in human corpus cavernosum vascular smooth muscle. FASEB J. 1995;9:A913. Abstract.
This Issue
Jump to
- Article
- Abstract
- Neuronal Innervation of Vascular Smooth Muscle
- Electrical Properties of Vascular Smooth Muscle
- Intercellular Communication Among Vascular Wall Cells
- Physiological Evidence for a Potentially Important Role of Gap Junctions in Vascular Tissues
- Diffusion of Second Messenger Molecules Through Gap Junction Channels Connecting Vascular Wall Cells
- Modeling Intercellular Communication Mediated by Gap Junctions
- Neuronal Innervation, Signal Transduction, Gap Junctions, and Vascular Tone
- Pathophysiology of Gap Junctions
- Summary and Conclusions
- References
- Figures & Tables
- Info & Metrics
Article Tools
- Gap Junctions in Vascular TissuesGeorge J. Christ, David C. Spray, Marwan El-Sabban, Lisa K. Moore and Peter R. BrinkCirculation Research. 1996;79:631-646, originally published October 1, 1996https://doi.org/10.1161/01.RES.79.4.631
Citation Manager Formats