Skip main navigation

Characteristics of binding of endothelin-1 and endothelin-3 to rat hearts. Developmental changes in mechanical responses and receptor subtypes.

Originally publishedhttps://doi.org/10.1161/01.RES.69.4.918Circulation Research. 1991;69:918–926

    Endothelin-1 (ET-1) and endothelin-3 (ET-3) produced positive inotropic effects on electrically stimulated left atria and increased the frequency of spontaneously beating right atria of adult rats. The potency of the inotropic effect of ET-1 was greater than that of ET-3, but the potencies of the chronotropic effects of ET-1 and ET-3 were not significantly different. In the neonatal atria, ET-1 and ET-3 also induced positive inotropic and chronotropic responses. ET-1 and ET-3 showed weak or no cardiotonic effects on the adult ventricles, whereas they caused marked positive inotropy in the neonatal ventricles. The characteristics of binding sites for ET-1 and ET-3 were very similar between the atria and the ventricles of the rat neonate. Saturation and competition binding experiments have shown that neonatal cardiac membranes from both atria and ventricle have two distinct binding sites for endothelin, that is, a low-affinity and a high-affinity site. ET-1 was found to bind to the low-affinity sites with a significantly lower Kd than ET-3, whereas the estimated Kd values for ET-1 and ET-3 at the high affinity sites were similar. In contrast, the binding sites in adult atria were different from those of the ventricles: only a single binding site for both ET-1 and ET-3 was detected. Adult atrial membranes, on the other hand, had two distinct binding sites similar to those of neonatal membranes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

    eLetters(0)

    eLetters should relate to an article recently published in the journal and are not a forum for providing unpublished data. Comments are reviewed for appropriate use of tone and language. Comments are not peer-reviewed. Acceptable comments are posted to the journal website only. Comments are not published in an issue and are not indexed in PubMed. Comments should be no longer than 500 words and will only be posted online. References are limited to 10. Authors of the article cited in the comment will be invited to reply, as appropriate.

    Comments and feedback on AHA/ASA Scientific Statements and Guidelines should be directed to the AHA/ASA Manuscript Oversight Committee via its Correspondence page.