Skip to main content
  • American Heart Association
  • Science Volunteer
  • Warning Signs
  • Advanced Search
  • Donate

  • Home
  • About this Journal
    • Editorial Board
    • Meet the Editors
    • Editorial Manifesto
    • Impact Factor
    • Journal History
    • General Statistics
  • All Issues
  • Subjects
    • All Subjects
    • Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research
    • Critical Care and Resuscitation
    • Epidemiology, Lifestyle, and Prevention
    • Genetics
    • Heart Failure and Cardiac Disease
    • Hypertension
    • Imaging and Diagnostic Testing
    • Intervention, Surgery, Transplantation
    • Quality and Outcomes
    • Stroke
    • Vascular Disease
  • Browse Features
    • Circulation Research Profiles
    • Trainees & Young Investigators
    • Research Around the World
    • News & Views
    • The NHLBI Page
    • Viewpoints
    • Compendia
    • Reviews
    • Recent Review Series
    • Profiles in Cardiovascular Science
    • Leaders in Cardiovascular Science
    • Commentaries on Cutting Edge Science
    • AHA/BCVS Scientific Statements
    • Abstract Supplements
    • Circulation Research Classics
    • In This Issue Archive
    • Anthology of Images
  • Resources
    • Online Submission/Peer Review
    • Why Submit to Circulation Research
    • Instructions for Authors
    • → Article Types
    • → Manuscript Preparation
    • → Submission Tips
    • → Journal Policies
    • Circulation Research Awards
    • Image Gallery
    • Council on Basic Cardiovascular Sciences
    • Customer Service & Ordering Info
    • International Users
  • AHA Journals
    • AHA Journals Home
    • Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology (ATVB)
    • Circulation
    • → Circ: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • → Circ: Genomic and Precision Medicine
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Imaging
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Interventions
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes
    • → Circ: Heart Failure
    • Circulation Research
    • Hypertension
    • Stroke
    • Journal of the American Heart Association
  • Impact Factor 13.965
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

  • My alerts
  • Sign In
  • Join

  • Advanced search

Header Publisher Menu

  • American Heart Association
  • Science Volunteer
  • Warning Signs
  • Advanced Search
  • Donate

Circulation Research

  • My alerts
  • Sign In
  • Join

  • Impact Factor 13.965
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Home
  • About this Journal
    • Editorial Board
    • Meet the Editors
    • Editorial Manifesto
    • Impact Factor
    • Journal History
    • General Statistics
  • All Issues
  • Subjects
    • All Subjects
    • Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research
    • Critical Care and Resuscitation
    • Epidemiology, Lifestyle, and Prevention
    • Genetics
    • Heart Failure and Cardiac Disease
    • Hypertension
    • Imaging and Diagnostic Testing
    • Intervention, Surgery, Transplantation
    • Quality and Outcomes
    • Stroke
    • Vascular Disease
  • Browse Features
    • Circulation Research Profiles
    • Trainees & Young Investigators
    • Research Around the World
    • News & Views
    • The NHLBI Page
    • Viewpoints
    • Compendia
    • Reviews
    • Recent Review Series
    • Profiles in Cardiovascular Science
    • Leaders in Cardiovascular Science
    • Commentaries on Cutting Edge Science
    • AHA/BCVS Scientific Statements
    • Abstract Supplements
    • Circulation Research Classics
    • In This Issue Archive
    • Anthology of Images
  • Resources
    • Online Submission/Peer Review
    • Why Submit to Circulation Research
    • Instructions for Authors
    • → Article Types
    • → Manuscript Preparation
    • → Submission Tips
    • → Journal Policies
    • Circulation Research Awards
    • Image Gallery
    • Council on Basic Cardiovascular Sciences
    • Customer Service & Ordering Info
    • International Users
  • AHA Journals
    • AHA Journals Home
    • Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology (ATVB)
    • Circulation
    • → Circ: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • → Circ: Genomic and Precision Medicine
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Imaging
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Interventions
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes
    • → Circ: Heart Failure
    • Circulation Research
    • Hypertension
    • Stroke
    • Journal of the American Heart Association
ARTICLES

Reflex chronotropic and inotropic effects of calcium channel-blocking agents in conscious dogs. Diltiazem, verapamil, and nifedipine compared.

H Nakaya, A Schwartz, R W Millard
Download PDF
https://doi.org/10.1161/01.RES.52.3.302
Circulation Research. 1983;52:302-311
Originally published March 1, 1983
H Nakaya
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A Schwartz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R W Millard
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Jump to

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
Loading

Abstract

In chronically instrumented, conscious dogs, rapid injection of equihypotensive doses of three calcium channel-blocking agents, verapamil (250 micrograms/kg), diltiazem (200 micrograms/kg) and nifedipine (50 micrograms/kg), produced disparate chronotropic and inotropic responses. Although they all decreased mean arterial pressure by about 10%, heart rate (93 +/- 4 beats/min) was markedly increased to 175 +/- 12 with nifedipine, to 163 +/- 15 with verapamil, and only slightly increased to 118 +/- 7 with diltiazem. Contractile responses measured before (left ventricular dP/dtmax, 2749 +/- 131 mm Hg/sec) and during left ventricular ejection (endocardial dimension dD/dtmax, 57 +/- 4 mm/sec) were increased by 24% and 14% with nifedipine, decreased by 26% and 22% with verapamil, and were unchanged with diltiazem. These chronotropic and inotropic responses to rapid intravenous administration of the three drugs were increased in a dose-dependent manner. Similar results also were observed after slow infusion of these drugs. To determine the extent to which autonomic reflexes participated in these cardiac responses, propranolol (0.5 mg/kg) or propranolol plus atropine (0.1-0.2 mg/kg) was administered prior to injection of each calcium channel-blocking agent. Propranolol abolished the positive inotropic response to nifedipine and potentiated the negative inotropic response to verapamil. Positive chronotropic responses to verapamil, nifedipine, and diltiazem were attenuated by propranolol plus atropine. These results suggest that equihypotensive doses of the three prominent calcium channel-blocking agents exert different degrees of autonomic reflex activation in awake, unsedated dogs. These reflexes, which modulate the direct effects of calcium channel-blocking agents on chronotropic and inotropic variables of the heart, may have important clinical implications.

  • Copyright © 1983 by American Heart Association
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

Circulation Research
March 1, 1983, Volume 52, Issue 3
  • Table of Contents
Previous ArticleNext Article

Jump to

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Article Tools

  • Print
  • Citation Tools
    Reflex chronotropic and inotropic effects of calcium channel-blocking agents in conscious dogs. Diltiazem, verapamil, and nifedipine compared.
    H Nakaya, A Schwartz and R W Millard
    Circulation Research. 1983;52:302-311, originally published March 1, 1983
    https://doi.org/10.1161/01.RES.52.3.302

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
  • Article Alerts
    Log in to Email Alerts with your email address.
  • Save to my folders

Share this Article

  • Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Circulation Research.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Reflex chronotropic and inotropic effects of calcium channel-blocking agents in conscious dogs. Diltiazem, verapamil, and nifedipine compared.
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from Circulation Research
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the Circulation Research web site.
  • Share on Social Media
    Reflex chronotropic and inotropic effects of calcium channel-blocking agents in conscious dogs. Diltiazem, verapamil, and nifedipine compared.
    H Nakaya, A Schwartz and R W Millard
    Circulation Research. 1983;52:302-311, originally published March 1, 1983
    https://doi.org/10.1161/01.RES.52.3.302
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

Related Articles

Cited By...

Circulation Research

  • About Circulation Research
  • Editorial Board
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Abstract Supplements
  • AHA Statements and Guidelines
  • Permissions
  • Reprints
  • Email Alerts
  • Open Access Information
  • AHA Journals RSS
  • AHA Newsroom

Editorial Office Address:
3355 Keswick Rd
Main Bldg 103
Baltimore, MD 21211
CircRes@circresearch.org

Information for:
  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Subscriber Help
  • Institutions / Librarians
  • Institutional Subscriptions FAQ
  • International Users
American Heart Association Learn and Live
National Center
7272 Greenville Ave.
Dallas, TX 75231

Customer Service

  • 1-800-AHA-USA-1
  • 1-800-242-8721
  • Local Info
  • Contact Us

About Us

Our mission is to build healthier lives, free of cardiovascular diseases and stroke. That single purpose drives all we do. The need for our work is beyond question. Find Out More about the American Heart Association

  • Careers
  • SHOP
  • Latest Heart and Stroke News
  • AHA/ASA Media Newsroom

Our Sites

  • American Heart Association
  • American Stroke Association
  • For Professionals
  • More Sites

Take Action

  • Advocate
  • Donate
  • Planned Giving
  • Volunteer

Online Communities

  • AFib Support
  • Garden Community
  • Patient Support Network
  • Professional Online Network

Follow Us:

  • Follow Circulation on Twitter
  • Visit Circulation on Facebook
  • Follow Circulation on Google Plus
  • Follow Circulation on Instagram
  • Follow Circulation on Pinterest
  • Follow Circulation on YouTube
  • Rss Feeds
  • Privacy Policy
  • Copyright
  • Ethics Policy
  • Conflict of Interest Policy
  • Linking Policy
  • Diversity
  • Careers

©2018 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. The American Heart Association is a qualified 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization.
*Red Dress™ DHHS, Go Red™ AHA; National Wear Red Day ® is a registered trademark.

  • PUTTING PATIENTS FIRST National Health Council Standards of Excellence Certification Program
  • BBB Accredited Charity
  • Comodo Secured