Skip to main content
  • American Heart Association
  • Science Volunteer
  • Warning Signs
  • Advanced Search
  • Donate

  • Home
  • About this Journal
    • Editorial Board
    • Meet the Editors
    • Editorial Manifesto
    • Impact Factor
    • Journal History
    • General Statistics
  • All Issues
  • Subjects
    • All Subjects
    • Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research
    • Critical Care and Resuscitation
    • Epidemiology, Lifestyle, and Prevention
    • Genetics
    • Heart Failure and Cardiac Disease
    • Hypertension
    • Imaging and Diagnostic Testing
    • Intervention, Surgery, Transplantation
    • Quality and Outcomes
    • Stroke
    • Vascular Disease
  • Browse Features
    • Circulation Research Profiles
    • Trainees & Young Investigators
    • Research Around the World
    • News & Views
    • The NHLBI Page
    • Viewpoints
    • Compendia
    • Reviews
    • Recent Review Series
    • Profiles in Cardiovascular Science
    • Leaders in Cardiovascular Science
    • Commentaries on Cutting Edge Science
    • AHA/BCVS Scientific Statements
    • Abstract Supplements
    • Circulation Research Classics
    • In This Issue Archive
    • Anthology of Images
  • Resources
    • Online Submission/Peer Review
    • Why Submit to Circulation Research
    • Instructions for Authors
    • → Article Types
    • → Manuscript Preparation
    • → Submission Tips
    • → Journal Policies
    • Circulation Research Awards
    • Image Gallery
    • Council on Basic Cardiovascular Sciences
    • Customer Service & Ordering Info
    • International Users
  • AHA Journals
    • AHA Journals Home
    • Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology (ATVB)
    • Circulation
    • → Circ: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • → Circ: Genomic and Precision Medicine
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Imaging
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Interventions
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes
    • → Circ: Heart Failure
    • Circulation Research
    • Hypertension
    • Stroke
    • Journal of the American Heart Association
  • Impact Factor 13.965
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

  • My alerts
  • Sign In
  • Join

  • Advanced search

Header Publisher Menu

  • American Heart Association
  • Science Volunteer
  • Warning Signs
  • Advanced Search
  • Donate

Circulation Research

  • My alerts
  • Sign In
  • Join

  • Impact Factor 13.965
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Home
  • About this Journal
    • Editorial Board
    • Meet the Editors
    • Editorial Manifesto
    • Impact Factor
    • Journal History
    • General Statistics
  • All Issues
  • Subjects
    • All Subjects
    • Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research
    • Critical Care and Resuscitation
    • Epidemiology, Lifestyle, and Prevention
    • Genetics
    • Heart Failure and Cardiac Disease
    • Hypertension
    • Imaging and Diagnostic Testing
    • Intervention, Surgery, Transplantation
    • Quality and Outcomes
    • Stroke
    • Vascular Disease
  • Browse Features
    • Circulation Research Profiles
    • Trainees & Young Investigators
    • Research Around the World
    • News & Views
    • The NHLBI Page
    • Viewpoints
    • Compendia
    • Reviews
    • Recent Review Series
    • Profiles in Cardiovascular Science
    • Leaders in Cardiovascular Science
    • Commentaries on Cutting Edge Science
    • AHA/BCVS Scientific Statements
    • Abstract Supplements
    • Circulation Research Classics
    • In This Issue Archive
    • Anthology of Images
  • Resources
    • Online Submission/Peer Review
    • Why Submit to Circulation Research
    • Instructions for Authors
    • → Article Types
    • → Manuscript Preparation
    • → Submission Tips
    • → Journal Policies
    • Circulation Research Awards
    • Image Gallery
    • Council on Basic Cardiovascular Sciences
    • Customer Service & Ordering Info
    • International Users
  • AHA Journals
    • AHA Journals Home
    • Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology (ATVB)
    • Circulation
    • → Circ: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • → Circ: Genomic and Precision Medicine
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Imaging
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Interventions
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes
    • → Circ: Heart Failure
    • Circulation Research
    • Hypertension
    • Stroke
    • Journal of the American Heart Association
Molecular Medicine

Receptor-Mediated Mechanism Controlling Tissue Levels of Bioactive Lipid Oxidation ProductsNovelty and Significance

Young-Woong Kim, Valentin P. Yakubenko, Xiaoxia Z. West, Gabriel B. Gugiu, Kutralanathan Renganathan, Sudipta Biswas, Detao Gao, John W. Crabb, Robert G. Salomon, Eugene A. Podrez, Tatiana V. Byzova
Download PDF
https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.305925
Circulation Research. 2015;117:321-332
Originally published May 12, 2015
Young-Woong Kim
From the Department of Molecular Cardiology, Lerner Research Institute (Y.-W.K., V.P.Y., X.Z.W., S.B., D.G., E.A.P., T.V.B.) and Department of Ophthalmology, Cole Eye Institute (R.K., J.W.C.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Department of Chemistry, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (G.B.G., R.K., R.G.S.).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Valentin P. Yakubenko
From the Department of Molecular Cardiology, Lerner Research Institute (Y.-W.K., V.P.Y., X.Z.W., S.B., D.G., E.A.P., T.V.B.) and Department of Ophthalmology, Cole Eye Institute (R.K., J.W.C.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Department of Chemistry, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (G.B.G., R.K., R.G.S.).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xiaoxia Z. West
From the Department of Molecular Cardiology, Lerner Research Institute (Y.-W.K., V.P.Y., X.Z.W., S.B., D.G., E.A.P., T.V.B.) and Department of Ophthalmology, Cole Eye Institute (R.K., J.W.C.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Department of Chemistry, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (G.B.G., R.K., R.G.S.).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gabriel B. Gugiu
From the Department of Molecular Cardiology, Lerner Research Institute (Y.-W.K., V.P.Y., X.Z.W., S.B., D.G., E.A.P., T.V.B.) and Department of Ophthalmology, Cole Eye Institute (R.K., J.W.C.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Department of Chemistry, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (G.B.G., R.K., R.G.S.).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kutralanathan Renganathan
From the Department of Molecular Cardiology, Lerner Research Institute (Y.-W.K., V.P.Y., X.Z.W., S.B., D.G., E.A.P., T.V.B.) and Department of Ophthalmology, Cole Eye Institute (R.K., J.W.C.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Department of Chemistry, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (G.B.G., R.K., R.G.S.).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sudipta Biswas
From the Department of Molecular Cardiology, Lerner Research Institute (Y.-W.K., V.P.Y., X.Z.W., S.B., D.G., E.A.P., T.V.B.) and Department of Ophthalmology, Cole Eye Institute (R.K., J.W.C.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Department of Chemistry, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (G.B.G., R.K., R.G.S.).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Detao Gao
From the Department of Molecular Cardiology, Lerner Research Institute (Y.-W.K., V.P.Y., X.Z.W., S.B., D.G., E.A.P., T.V.B.) and Department of Ophthalmology, Cole Eye Institute (R.K., J.W.C.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Department of Chemistry, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (G.B.G., R.K., R.G.S.).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John W. Crabb
From the Department of Molecular Cardiology, Lerner Research Institute (Y.-W.K., V.P.Y., X.Z.W., S.B., D.G., E.A.P., T.V.B.) and Department of Ophthalmology, Cole Eye Institute (R.K., J.W.C.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Department of Chemistry, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (G.B.G., R.K., R.G.S.).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert G. Salomon
From the Department of Molecular Cardiology, Lerner Research Institute (Y.-W.K., V.P.Y., X.Z.W., S.B., D.G., E.A.P., T.V.B.) and Department of Ophthalmology, Cole Eye Institute (R.K., J.W.C.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Department of Chemistry, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (G.B.G., R.K., R.G.S.).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eugene A. Podrez
From the Department of Molecular Cardiology, Lerner Research Institute (Y.-W.K., V.P.Y., X.Z.W., S.B., D.G., E.A.P., T.V.B.) and Department of Ophthalmology, Cole Eye Institute (R.K., J.W.C.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Department of Chemistry, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (G.B.G., R.K., R.G.S.).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tatiana V. Byzova
From the Department of Molecular Cardiology, Lerner Research Institute (Y.-W.K., V.P.Y., X.Z.W., S.B., D.G., E.A.P., T.V.B.) and Department of Ophthalmology, Cole Eye Institute (R.K., J.W.C.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Department of Chemistry, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (G.B.G., R.K., R.G.S.).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Supplemental Materials
  • Info & Metrics

Jump to

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Sources of Funding
    • Disclosures
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Supplemental Materials
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
Loading

Abstract

Rationale: Oxidative stress is an important contributing factor in several human pathologies ranging from atherosclerosis to cancer progression; however, the mechanisms underlying tissue protection from oxidation products are poorly understood. Oxidation of membrane phospholipids, containing the polyunsaturated fatty acid docosahexaenoic acid, results in the accumulation of an end product, 2-(ω-carboxyethyl)pyrrole (CEP), which was shown to have proangiogenic and proinflammatory functions. Although CEP is continuously accumulated during chronic processes, such as tumor progression and atherosclerosis, its level during wound healing return to normal when the wound is healed, suggesting the existence of a specific clearance mechanism.

Objective: To identify the cellular and molecular mechanism for CEP clearance.

Methods and Results: Here, we show that macrophages are able to bind, scavenge, and metabolize carboxyethylpyrrole derivatives of proteins but not structurally similar ethylpyrrole derivatives, demonstrating the high specificity of the process. F4/80hi and M2-skewed macrophages are much more efficient at CEP binding and scavenging compared with F4/80lo and M1-skewed macrophages. Depletion of macrophages leads to increased CEP accumulation in vivo. CEP binding and clearance are dependent on 2 receptors expressed by macrophages, CD36 and toll-like receptor 2. Although knockout of each individual receptor results in diminished CEP clearance, the lack of both receptors almost completely abrogates macrophages’ ability to scavenge CEP derivatives of proteins.

Conclusions: Our study demonstrates the mechanisms of recognition, scavenging, and clearance of pathophysiologically active products of lipid oxidation in vivo, thereby contributing to tissue protection against products of oxidative stress.

  • angiogenesis inducing agents
  • antigens, CD36
  • macrophages
  • toll-like receptor 2
  • wound healing

Introduction

Oxidative stress is linked to the pathogenesis of age-related and chronic diseases, including atherosclerosis, cancer, etc.1–3 Although well-controlled oxidative response has a protective role during acute inflammation and subsequent tissue repair, excessive oxidation exerts detrimental effects on tissues, thereby contributing to several pathologies.4 Reactive oxygen species generated during inflammation modify a wide spectrum of targets resulting in accumulation of oxidized metabolic products.2 Among substrates highly prone to oxidation are polyunsaturated fatty acids. Therefore, the formation and accumulation of lipid peroxidation (LPO) products is an inevitable consequence of oxidative stress in vivo.5–7 During the considerable lifespan of humans, repeated oxidative stress combined with a virtually limitless source of substrates, exemplified by polyunsaturated fatty acids of plasma membranes, might ultimately result in accumulation of high levels of potentially harmful metabolic byproducts.7,8 The imbalance between the production and removal of harmful substances leads to impaired homeostasis.9

Editorial, see p 305

One polyunsaturated fatty acids, docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), gives rise to products of oxidative fragmentation that contain (E)-4-hydroxy-7-oxohept-5-enoic acid, which, in turn, reacts with proteins or ethanolamine phospholipids, thereby generating 2-(ω-carboxyethyl)pyrrole (CEP) containing protein or lipid derivatives (see detail10). Because of abundance of DHA, high levels of CEP in vivo can be regarded as a sign of substantial oxidative stress.10–13 Indeed, CEP-containing products were found in several inflammation- and age-related human pathologies.10,14–16 CEP-modified proteins10,13,17,18 and phospholipids15 were shown to be elevated in patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) using both immunoassays19,20 and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.15 CEP levels are significantly elevated within the vessel wall of aging animals and in tumors with substantial inflammation.14 Recent studies identified several CEP activities, including proangiogenic14,15 and proinflammatory21,22 functions. Stimulation of angiogenesis was shown to be mediated by toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) on endothelial cells14,15 independently of vascular endothelial growth factor signaling.14,23 CEP was reported to stimulate macrophages to express several proinflammatory cytokines.21,22,24 CEP adducts also promote platelet activation, granule secretion, and aggregation in vitro and thrombosis in vivo.25 Collectively, CEP accumulation might contribute to several pathologies. Therefore, it is important to establish whether or not the highly active products of LPO can be further metabolized and cleared from the tissues.

Indeed, CEP level seems to be finely regulated in the physiological context, as it is dramatically increased at the early stage of wound healing, but returns to normal when the wound has healed.14 It seems that after revascularization, CEP has been either degraded or metabolized. Although many macromolecules have fast rates of turnover, this mechanism does not seem to be applicable to CEP, where the pyrrole moiety is stabilized by aromaticity. Alternatively, scavenger cells, such as macrophages, might be involved in this process.9,20,26,27 Macrophages are highly heterogeneous, but can be generally placed into 2 major subtypes, proinflammatory M1 and anti-inflammatory M2; the latter are more efficient in scavenging activity because of higher expression of scavenger and mannose receptors.26,27 Peritoneal macrophages are often divided into 2 populations, F4/80hi and F4/80lo macrophages.28,29 F4/80lo macrophages promote immune response through antigen presentation, whereas F4/80hi macrophages are specialized for scavenging mainly through phagocytosis.28

In this study, we show that CEP, but not structurally similar compounds, is specifically recognized and scavenged by macrophages; CD36, and, to a lesser extent, TLR2, are directly involved in this process. Deficiency in receptor-mediated CEP clearance causes CEP accumulation and increased angiogenesis in wounds.

Methods

Expanded Methods are presented in the Online Data Supplement.

Results

Differential Accumulation Patterns for CEP Modifications In Vivo

We first analyzed the pattern of CEP accumulation in wounds on the back of 8-week-old mice for a month. Although CEP was barely detectable in normal skin, its levels were dramatically increased in 3-day-old wounds, following a bell-shaped curve at later time points and returning to the normal levels at day 24 post injury, when wounds were almost completely healed (Figure 1A). Histological analyses revealed that CEP was highly localized in the scabs, granulation tissues, and hypertrophic epidermal wound edges at day 5, whereas at day 24, it was only present in the epidermis and hair follicles (Figure 1B). The transient nature of CEP presence in wounds and its rapid downregulation after completion of angiogenesis and the healing process indicate an existence of a specific mechanism of CEP clearance.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Regulation of 2-(ω-carboxyethyl)pyrrole (CEP) levels in vivo. A, The presence of CEP-containing modifications in vivo during wound healing (n=5, top). The wounded skins were collected at the indicated times, homogenized, and then each supernatant was used for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). CEP concentration was normalized by total protein concentration. Bottom, Representative images of wounds on the mouse back skins at the times indicated (n=5) are shown. B, Hematoxylin and eosin (H/E) and CEP immunofluorescence staining of the wounded skins at day 5 (5d) and 24 (24d). Note that CEP is stained on the scabs, granulation tissues, and hypertrophic epidermal wound edges at day 5, whereas CEP is slightly stained in the epidermis and hair follicles at day 24. C, CEP accumulation in implanted B16-F10 murine melanomas was measured by ELISA. Melanomas were collected at day 7, 14, and 21 after subcutaneous injections of B16-F10 murine melanoma cells (7.0×105 cells per injection) into mice (n=4). D, Hematoxylin and eosin and fluorescence staining for CEP, CD68 (macrophages), and 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, nuclei) of the aorta of Apoe−/− mice (fed with Western diet [WD] for 5 weeks) and age- and gender-matched wild-type (WT) control mice (fed with chow diet [CD]). Note that CEP was positively stained only in atherosclerotic lesions (n=3). Bottom, Quantification of CEP and CD68 immunofluorescence of WT and Apoe−/− mice. Fold increase over WT control is shown. E, Plasma levels of CEP from the same Apoe−/− and WT mice (D), measured by ELISA (n=3). Fold increase over WT control is shown. The absolute concentration of CEP in Apoe−/− mice was 70–100×10–12 mol/L based on CEP standard (see Methods). F, Plasma levels of CEP from Apoe−/− and WT mice, which were fed with a CD or WD for 16 weeks, were measured by ELISA. Fold increase over WT control on CD is shown. G, Upregulation of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), measured by ELISA, in thioglycolate-elicited mouse peritoneal macrophages on treatment with 10 μmol/L of CEP-bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 4 hours. H, Upregulation of Tnf-α gene, measured by quantitative polymerase chain reaction, in resident mouse peritoneal macrophages on treatment with 10 μmol/L of CEP-BSA for 4 hours. Fold increase over BSA-treated cells is shown. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.005.

Because wound healing is a physiological process that restores original tissue integrity and functionality, we next assessed CEP accumulation in chronic pathological processes associated with continuous oxidative stress, such as tumor progression and atherosclerotic lesion development.4,30 CEP levels in melanomas were continuously increasing during tumor progression at 7, 14, and 21 days post implantation, whereas the tumor volume was increased by >60-fold within 2 weeks (Figure 1C; Online Figure I). Likewise, CEP was present at high levels in atherosclerotic lesions of Apoe−/− mice fed with a Western diet (WD) when compared with a control, in which there was no positive signal for CEP (Figure 1D). Moreover, the plasma CEP levels in these Apoe−/− mice were increased >8-fold when compared with controls, demonstrating that CEP presence in vivo was not limited to the atherosclerotic lesions but was a rather systemic response (Figure 1E). Plasma CEP levels in Apoe−/− mice were higher than those of wild-type (WT) mice even without a WD, however, a WD substantially augmented the oxidative processes resulting in at least 2-fold increase of CEP levels in blood of Apoe−/− mice (Figure 1F). After 18 weeks on a WD, CEP levels within the atherosclerotic lesions of Apoe−/− mice remained continuously high (Online Figure II). Thus, the transient nature of CEP presence during wound healing is in contrast to its continuous accumulation in pathologies associated with inflammation and oxidative stress, implying the existence of a specific mechanism responsible for CEP degradation.

Besides the proangiogenic effect of CEP (Online Figure III),14,23 it has a proinflammatory role.21,22,24 Indeed, in the presence of CEP, macrophages upregulated a proinflammatory cytokine, tumor necrosis factor-α, both at a protein (Figure 1G) as well as at an mRNA level (Figure 1H). Together with previous observations, this suggests that high levels of CEP might augment chronic pathological processes and emphasize an importance of the timely removal of this end product of LPO.

CEP Binding to Macrophages

To identify the cell type responsible for CEP clearance, we first tested the ability of various immune cells, such as R-MPMs (resident mouse peritoneal macrophages), bone marrow neutrophils, and lymph node T and B cells to bind to CEP directly. Based on fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis, macrophages bound to CEP-bovine serum albumin (BSA) in a concentration-dependent manner, achieving saturation at 200 nmol/L (Figure 2A). Then, we observed 2 distinct populations of macrophages according F4/80 expression, F4/80lo and F4/80hi, and measured CEP binding by fluorescence-activated cell sorting. F4/80hi macrophages bound to CEP in a concentration-dependent manner and the maximum binding of CEP-BSA to this cell population was at least 10× higher than to F4/80lo macrophages based on fluorescence intensity (Figure 2B). F4/80lo macrophages are a minor subset of R-MPMs, whereas >80% of total R-MPMs are F4/80hi (Online Figure IVA). MHC-II (major histocompatibility complex class II) expression is high on F4/80lo macrophages, which are known to serve as antigen-presenting cells in vitro, but low on F4/80hi macrophages (Online Figure IVB). In contrast, scavenger receptors and pattern recognition receptors, such as CD36 and TLR2, respectively, are highly expressed on F4/80hi macrophages (Online Figure IVB), which are known to be involved in phagocytosis of apoptotic cells in vivo.28 The concentration-dependent manner of CEP-BSA binding with a clear saturation together with differential interaction with distinct cell populations suggests the involvement of specific cell surface receptors. To rule out the possibility that the binding might be mediated by BSA but not by the CEP moiety, fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated BSA (FITC-BSA) was used as a control. Fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis showed that there were dose-dependently positive signals when CEP-BSA, but not FITC-BSA, was exposed to macrophages (Online Figure V).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

2-(ω-carboxyethyl)pyrrole (CEP) binding and scavenging by macrophages. A and B, Flow cytometry analysis of CEP binding on primary blood cells, such as macrophages, neutrophils, T and B cells (A), and F4/80hi and F4/80lo macrophages (B), which were incubated on ice for 30 minutes with CEP-bovine serum albumin (BSA) at the concentrations indicated, after freshly isolated from mouse bone marrow (for neutrophils), lymph nodes (for T and B cells), and peritoneum (for macrophages and B cells). Mean fluorescence intensity was normalized to that of 300 nmol/L CEP treatment, which was assigned a value of 100%. C, Immunofluorescence staining for CEP, CD68, and 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) on the frozen sections of mouse back skins collected at 2 hours after intradermal injections of 10 μmol/L CEP-BSA or an equal amount of BSA as a control. Right, CEP presence in cells was measured by quantification of CEP/DAPI staining, whereas CEP presence specifically in macrophages was assessed based on CEP/CD68 costaining in tissues section (left). The value of CEP/DAPI costaining was assigned 100%. D and E, Immunostaining for CEP, CD68, and DAPI on the primary resident mouse peritoneal macrophages (R-MPMs) is shown. Cells were incubated at 37°C for the times indicated; then washed, culture media were changed with fresh media without CEP-BSA, and incubated for additional 0, 30, and 90 minutes after 30 minutes for pulse treatment (D) or during the entire incubation (E) with 500 nmol/L of CEP-BSA. F, CEP was quantified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) before and after incubation with macrophages. After 500 nmol/L CEP-BSA was added to the R-MPMs at 37°C, the supernatants were then collected at the times indicated, measured by ELISA, and normalized to the CEP only-containing culture media without macrophages. Percentage of remaining CEP is shown. Initial concentration of CEP (time point 0) was assigned a value of 100%. G, Simplified chemical structures of CEP and EP. H, Detection of ethylpyrrole (EP) by immunofluorescence in primary R-MPMs. In parallel, the staining for CD68 and DAPI is shown. R-MPMs were incubated at 37°C for the times indicated with 500 nmol/L of EP-BSA. Note that certain levels of EP are endogenously present in cells, but both binding and scavenging are lacking. Right, Quantification of EP fluorescence at the times indicated. Fold changes in EP staining are shown. Initial staining for EP (0 hours) was assigned a value of 1. I, Immunofluorescence of F4/80 (macrophage) and DAPI on the back skins of mice treated with control- or clodronate-liposome for 3 days. Right, Quantification of F4/80 fluorescence based on tissue sections shown (left). Fold changes in macrophage count is shown. Macrophage count in mice treated with control antibody was assigned a value of 100%. J, Impaired CEP clearance in clodronate-treated mice (as in I). Skins were collected at the times indicated from control- or clodronate-liposome treated mice (n=3), after subcutaneous injections of 10 μmol/L CEP-BSA. Concentration of CEP in homogenates was measured by ELISA. Fold changes in CEP levels are shown. CEP concentration in skin 1 hour post injection was assigned a value of 1. ***P<0.005.

Next, we assessed whether exogenously provided CEP-BSA can interact with macrophages in vivo. Two hours after CEP injection, >80% of cells positive for CEP were also positive for CD68, a macrophage marker (Figure 2C). Thus, CEP is recognized by macrophages in vitro as well as in vivo.

Macrophages Are Able to Specifically Scavenge CEP But Not Similar Protein Modifications

To examine whether macrophages are able to scavenge and metabolize CEP, R-MPMs (that do not generate their own CEP) were incubated with exogenous CEP, washed, and the presence of remaining metabolite in cells was monitored. Within the first 30 minutes of incubation, CEP was strongly present in R-MPMs, however, the CEP positive signal was gradually reduced at 30 minutes and finally disappeared at 90 minutes after media change, indicating that CEP was being scavenged by macrophages (Figure 2D). When macrophages were incubated with CEP for 24 hours without media change, all of the CEP had merged with CD68, known to be expressed in the lysosomes31,32 (Figure 2E), implying that CEP was scavenged and possibly metabolized by macrophages. The rate of CEP scavenging by macrophages was monitored by measuring the concentration of CEP remaining in the culture medium by ELISA. As macrophages actively bound and scavenged CEP, the CEP levels reached at approximately 70% of the initial concentration within 30 minutes and continued decreasing to approximately 20% of the original CEP amount within 24 hours (Figure 2F).

To investigate the specificity of CEP recognition and clearance, we compared it with that of a structurally similar protein modification, ethylpyrrole (EP). This protein modification is not only structurally similar to CEP (only lacking the carboxy group as shown in Figure 2G), but it is cogenerated through an alternative oxidative cleavage of DHA to give 4-hydroxyhex-2-enal followed by condensation of 4-hydroxyhex-2-enal with the ε-amino group of lysyl residues (Online Data Supplement; Online Figure VIA). We compared the interaction of EP-BSA and CEP-BSA with macrophages (Online Figure VIB). As shown in Figure 2H, EP-BSA exhibited no binding to macrophages, which were not able to scavenge it for as long as 24 hours. Therefore, it seems that the process of recognition and scavenging by macrophages is highly specific for CEP-containing derivatives and it is not applicable to similar derivatives, such as EP-BSA modifications.

To demonstrate whether and how CEP is scavenged by macrophages in vivo, macrophages were depleted by clodronate treatment,33,34 resulting in at least 50% decrease in the amount of resident macrophages in skin (Figure 2I). Exogenous CEP was subcutaneously injected into control and macrophage-depleted mice, and amount of CEP in vivo was monitored. Although CEP levels in control mice were decreased in a time-dependent manner reaching ≈60% and 40% after 3 and 6 hours, respectively, there was a substantial delay in macrophage-depleted mice, where the levels were unchanged for at least 3 hours after CEP injection (Figure 2J). At the 6-hour time point, the remaining amount of CEP was about 2× higher in macrophage-depleted mice when compared with controls (Figure 2J). Collectively, these results demonstrate that CEP, a stable end-product of DHA oxidation, is scavenged by macrophages ex vivo and in vivo.

M2-Like Macrophages Efficiently Bind to and Scavenge CEP

As macrophages are mainly classified into 2 subtypes, M1 and M2, we examined whether 1 of these 2 populations preferentially bind to and scavenge CEP. To polarize macrophages toward M1- or M2-phenotypes, R-MPMs were treated by interferon-γ and lipopolysaccharide or interleukin-4, respectively, and the polarization was verified using known M1- or M2-markers.27 Although M1-markers, Nos2 and Cxcl10, were remarkably increased in the M1-like macrophages; M2-markers, Chi3l3 and Cd36, were markedly increased on the M2-like macrophages (Figure 3A). Although M2-like macrophages were able to efficiently bind CEP, the M1-like macrophages exhibited relatively low binding (Figure 3B). CEP scavenging activity was also significantly lower for the M1-like macrophages compared with the M2-like macrophages (Figure 3C). These results indicate that both, CEP binding and scavenging, were primarily mediated by M2-like macrophages rather than by M1-like macrophages.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

2-(ω-carboxyethyl)pyrrole (CEP) binding and scavenging by M1- or M2-like macrophages. A, Expression of M1 and M2 marker genes in polarized macrophages. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis of representative M1 marker genes (Nos2 and Cxcl10) and M2 marker gene (Chi3l3 and Cd36) normalized by 18s, from resident mouse peritoneal macrophages (R-MPMs) is shown. B, Immunofluorescence of CEP, inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS, M1 marker), and 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) on M1-like and M2-like macrophages treated by 500 nmol/L of CEP-bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 20 minutes. C, CEP levels that remained in the culture media. After 500 nmol/L CEP-BSA was treated to the R-MPMs at 37°C for 24 hours, the supernatants were collected. CEP levels were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and normalized to the CEP only-containing culture media without macrophages (this was assigned a value of 100%). **P<0.01, ***P<0.005.

CEP Demonstrates Direct Interactions With CD36 and TLR2

As CEP was shown to bind to TLR2 on endothelial cells to induce angiogenesis, we examined whether TLR2 on macrophages serves as a possible receptor for CEP. Because TLR2 is known to partner with other receptors, such as CD14 and CD36, these receptors were also considered. CD36 is highly expressed by both F4/80hi- and M2-like macrophages and is known to recognize several ligands, including modified lipoproteins, glycated proteins, and amyloid-forming peptides (Figure 3A; Online Figure IVD35–37). Accordingly, we assessed CEP interactions with recombinant TLR2-Fc, CD36-Fc, and CD14-Fc chimeras in a solid phase immunoassay. Both, CD36 and TLR2, bound to CEP in a concentration-dependent manner, whereas binding to CD14-Fc and Fc fragment alone was negligible (Figure 4A). Then, the binding of CEP to CD36 and TLR2 was measured in real time by surface plasmon resonance where CEP was injected and allowed to flow over immobilized CD36-Fc or TLR2-Fc (Figure 4B). The binding was confirmed by reversed surface plasmon resonance, where CD36-Fc or TLR2-Fc protein was injected at various concentrations and allowed to flow over immobilized CEP. Consistent with the results from Figure 4A, both proteins bound to CEP (Figure 4C and 4D). The dissociation constants (Kd) for CD36 and TLR2 with CEP were 6.53 and 11.8 nmol/L, respectively. Since the functions of TLR2 depend on its association with either TLR6 or TLR1, where TLR6 is known to be involved in its partnership with CD36,38 we assessed the direct binding of CEP to both TLRs using surface plasmon resonance. Although CEP interacted with both receptors (Online Figure VIIA–VIIC), the binding to TLR6 was substantially higher than that to TLR1 and compatible to that to CD36. This was confirmed by ELISA (Online Figure VIID). CEP binding to Tlr6−/− macrophages and the consequent intake was diminished compared with WT cells as evidenced by ≈30% decrease in average fluorescence intensity (Online Figure VIIE and VIIF).

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Direct binding between 2-(ω-carboxyethyl)pyrrole (CEP) and CD36 or toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2). A, Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay–based binding assay using various concentrations of CEP-bovine serum albumin (BSA) (0–1600 nmol/L) and Fc-conjugated chimeric proteins, such as TLR2-Fc, CD36-Fc, CD14-Fc. Binding to Fc-only served as a negative control (control-Fc). The absorbance values at 415 nm are shown. Values obtained using BSA-alone (as a coating substrate) were subtracted. B–D, Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) analysis of the binding between CEP and CD36 (B, C, E, and F), CEP and TLR2 (B and D). CD36-Fc, TLR2-Fc, and Fc-only were immobilized on CM5 chip and 2.5 μmol/L CEP-human serum albumin (HSA) in HEPES (4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid) buffer was flowed over the chip (B). CEP-HSA was immobilized on a CM5 chip and various concentrations of CD36-Fc (1.4–140 nmol/L; C) or TLR2-Fc (1–200 nmol/L; D) were flowed over the chip. Note that CEP demonstrates direct binding to CD36 and, to a lesser extent, TLR2. E and F, SPR analyses for CEP binding site on CD36. CD36-Fc (70 nmol/L) were preincubated with various concentrations of copper oxidized low-density lipoprotein (OxLDL; 10–200 μg/mL) and flowed over immobilized CEP-HSA. CEP binding to CD36 in the absence of OxLDL was assigned a value of 100% (E). Various concentrations of CD36 peptide (160SLINKSKSSMF170) or scrambled peptide (SIKVNLSQMKILNSI) were preincubated with 10 μmol/L of CEP-HSA and flowed over immobilized CD36-Fc. CEP binding to CD36 in the absence of peptide was assigned a value of 100% (F).

To further characterize the binding site for CEP on CD36, we performed a competition assay using a known ligand for CD36, oxidized low-density lipoprotein.36 Oxidized low-density lipoprotein competed with CEP in a dose-dependent manner, indicating that CEP and oxidized low-density lipoprotein might share the same binding site on CD36 (Figure 4E). Indeed, 160SLINKSKSSMF170 peptide derived from an extracellular domain of human CD36 and known to be critical for oxidized low-density lipoprotein binding39 inhibited CEP–CD36 interaction in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 4F).

CEP Scavenging Depends on CD36 and TLR2

The physical binding of CEP to CD36 was further confirmed by 2 different cell-based binding assays using stable cell lines expressing CD36, Raw264.7-CD36, and HEK293-CD36 (Online Figure VIII). HEK293-CD36 cells bound about 3× more to CEP than control cells (Figure 5A). A similar trend was observed using Raw264.7-CD36 cells (Figure 5B).40

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

2-(ω-carboxyethyl)pyrrole (CEP) binding and scavenging by CD36 and toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2). A and B, Cell-based CEP binding assay using HEK293 (A) and Raw264.7 (B), which were stably expressing CD36. CEP binding to the cells was visualized by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) after staining the cells with rabbit anti-CEP antibody and Alexa-488-conjugated antirabbit IgG secondary antibody. Mean fluorescence intensity are shown. C, Reduced CEP binding to CD36 null cells. Immunofluorescence of CEP, CD68, and 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) on the primary wild-type (WT) and Cd36−/− resident mouse peritoneal macrophages (R-MPMs), which were incubated at 37°C with 500 nmol/L CEP-BSA for 30 minutes. D, Reduced CEP scavenging by CD36 null cells. WT and Cd36−/− R-MPMs were treated with 500 nmol/L CEP-bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 24 hours at 37°C, then the supernatants were collected. CEP levels were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and residual CEP values are shown. The amount of CEP without added R-MPMs was assigned a value of 100%. E, Reduced CEP binding to TLR2 null cells. Immunofluorescence of CEP, CD68, and DAPI on the primary WT and Tlr2−/− R-MPMs, which were incubated at 37°C with 500 nmol/L CEP-BSA for 30 minutes. F, CEP scavenging by Tlr2−/− cells is reduced. WT and Cd36−/− R-MPMs were treated with 500 nmol/L CEP-BSA for 24 hours at 37°C, then the supernatants were collected. CEP levels measured by ELISA are shown. Amount of CEP without added R-MPMs was assigned a value of 100%. ***P<0.005.

Then, the role of CD36 in CEP clearance was tested using CD36-null (Cd36−/−) macrophages. When treated with CEP for 30 minutes, Cd36−/− macrophages bound substantially less CEP than WT macrophages (Figure 5C). Moreover, Cd36−/−- macrophages were defective in their ability to scavenge CEP. Although WT macrophages were able to metabolize about 40% of CEP in first 6 hours, CEP levels were not significantly changed in the presence of Cd36−/− macrophages (Figure 5D). After 24 hours, WT macrophages were able to remove ≈85%, whereas Cd36−/− macrophages metabolized only 40% of exogenously provided CEP (Figure 5D), indicating that CD36 on macrophages is essential for CEP binding and scavenging.

Similar experiments were conducted using Tlr2−/− macrophages. Compared with WT, Tlr2−/− macrophages bound less to CEP within 30 minutes (Figure 5E). Accordingly, CEP scavenging activity was also reduced in Tlr2−/− macrophages since after 24 hours, remaining amounts of CEP were ≈15% for WT and 40% for Tlr2−/− macrophages (Figure 5F). These experiments demonstrate that similar to CD36, TLR2 deficiency affects CEP binding and scavenging by macrophages, although the role of CD36 seems to be more prominent.

CEP Clearance Is Severely Impaired in CD36/TLR2 DKO Macrophages

Because CD36 often serves as a coreceptor for TLR2,38,41 we generated Cd36−/−;Tlr2−/− double knockout (DKO) mice to assess the cooperation between these receptors in CEP clearance by macrophages. We compared the ability of R-MPMs from WT, Cd36−/−, Tlr2−/−, and DKO mice to bind to and scavenge CEP. Although both, Tlr2−/− and Cd36−/−, macrophages bound only 60% and 75% less to CEP than WT, respectively, the binding to DKO macrophages was reduced by about 90% when compared with WT (Figure 6A and 6B). Likewise, the amount of CEP scavenged by WT, Tlr2−/−, Cd36−/−, and DKO macrophages within 24 hours was 70%, 55%, 40%, and 22%, respectively (Figure 6C). Together, the additive effect of Tlr2−/− and Cd36−/− deficiencies suggests that while these receptors are both important for CEP binding and clearance by macrophages, they might function independently and the role of CD36 was more prominent.

Figure 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6.

Additive effect of CD36 and toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) on 2-(ω-carboxyethyl)pyrrole (CEP) binding and scavenging. A, Immunofluorescence of CEP, CD68, and 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) using primary WT, Tlr2−/−, Cd36−/−, and Cd36−/−;Tlr2−/− double knockout (DKO) resident mouse peritoneal macrophages (R-MPMs), which were incubated at 37°C with 500 nmol/L CEP-bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 30 minutes. B, Quantification of CEP binding based on fluorescence. Binding to wild-type (WT) macrophages was assigned a value of 100% (A). C, Tlr2−/−, Cd36−/−, and Cd36−/−;Tlr2−/− DKO R-MPMs were treated with 500 nmol/L CEP-BSA for 24 hours at 37°C, then the supernatants were collected. CEP levels were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and residual CEP values are shown. The amount of CEP without added R-MPMs was assigned a value of 100%. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.005.

Defective CEP Clearance Affects Angiogenesis and Wound Closure in CD36 Null Mice

To assess the importance of CEP presence and timely removal in tissues, we analyzed angiogenesis and wound healing in Cd36−/− mice. Punch wounds were made on the back skin of 8-week-old WT and Cd36−/− mice and monitored for 7 days. Surprisingly, at the early time points (day 3), wound closure was accelerated in Cd36−/− mice when compared with WT, albeit no longer significantly at day 7 (Figure 7A; Online Figure IXA), which might be because of delayed clearance of apoptotic cells also mediated by CD36.35 At the same time, CD31 immunostaining revealed that angiogenesis in Cd36−/− wounds also occurred earlier than in WT mice (day 3 versus days 5–7, respectively; Figure 7B; Online Figure IXB). Costaining for CD31 and CEP revealed the presence of new blood vessels primarily in the CEP-positive area, suggesting that the faster angiogenesis might be because of increased levels of CEP in the Cd36−/− wounds (Figure 7B).

Figure 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 7.

Defective 2-(ω-carboxyethyl)pyrrole (CEP) clearance in Cd36−/− wounds. A, Representative images of wounds on the back skins of wild-type (WT) and Cd36−/− mice at day 3 (n=10). B, Two independent representative immunofluorescence staining for CEP, CD31, and 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) in tissue sections of WT and Cd36−/− mice at day 3 after wounding (n=5). Bottom, Quantification of CEP and CD31 fluorescence in tissue section of WT and Cd36−/− mice normalized to WT control is shown. C, Representative images of wounds on the back skins of Cd36−/− mice treated with either control- or CEP blocking antibody at day 3 (n=4). D, Immunofluorescence of CD31 and DAPI in skin of Cd36−/− mice treated with either control- or CEP blocking antibody at day 3 after wounding (n=4). Bottom, Quantification of CD31 fluorescence normalized to WT control. E, Immunofluorescence of CEP, F4/80, and DAPI in tissues sections of WT and Cd36−/− mice at day 3 after wounding. Right, Enlarged pictures of single macrophages (arrowheads). F and G, Multiphoton confocal images of CEP, F4/80, and DAPI staining of the single cells from wounded skins of WT and Cd36−/− mice at day 3 show reduced CEP levels in Cd36−/− skins. G, A cross-sectional image of WT cell and a side view of Cd36−/− cell were obtained from 3-dimensional reconstructions of multiphoton confocal z-stack images. Note that CEP localization differs between WT and Cd36−/− macrophages: it is seen in WT cells in cross-sectional images (inside of the cells) but not in other planes, whereas its presence was mainly extracellular in Cd36−/− cells. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.005.

To demonstrate the causative effect of CEP accumulation on the accelerated angiogenesis and wound closure in Cd36−/− mice, a mouse anti-CEP monoclonal antibody was introduced during wound healing to block the proangiogenic activity of CEP in vivo. The blockade of CEP activity in Cd36−/− mice substantially inhibited both the accelerated angiogenesis and wound closure, indicating a causative role for CEP accumulation in those processes (Figure 7C and 7D). Despite the comparable numbers of recruited macrophages, CEP clearance was less efficient in Cd36−/− wounds when compared with WT, based on F4/80 and CEP staining (Figure 7E). Analysis of the single cells in WT and Cd36−/− wounds at day 3 by a multiphoton confocal microscopy revealed that CEP was localized inside of the cells in WT, but remained on the cell membrane in Cd36−/− macrophages, implying defective scavenging (Figure 7F and 7G). Taken together, these results demonstrate that CD36 is absolutely required for CEP clearance in vivo. Cd36−/− mice exhibit increased CEP accumulation, which, in turn, mediates the accelerated angiogenesis and wound closure.

Discussion

The key findings of this study are the following: First, a biologically active product of DHA oxidation, CEP, is continuously accumulated in pathologies exemplified by tumors and atherosclerotic lesions. During wound healing, however, CEP levels follow a bell-shaped curve returning to normal low levels when the wound is healed. In contrast to the accepted paradigm, CEP modifications are not the final and nondegradable products of DHA oxidation, they can be removed by F4/80hi and M2-like macrophages ex vivo and in vivo. Second, this process is specific for CEP because the structurally similar modification, EP, was neither bound to nor degraded by macrophages. Third, this scavenging function is mediated by CD36 in cooperation with TLR2/TLR6, but not another TLR2 coreceptor, CD14. Cd36−/−, Tlr2−/−, Tlr6−/−, and especially Cd36−/−;Tlr2−/− DKO macrophages exhibit impaired abilities to bind to and scavenge CEP modifications. Fourth, the impaired CEP clearance in Cd36−/− mice leads to accelerated angiogenesis and wound closure. Together, this provides a cellular and molecular mechanism controlling tissue levels of the highly biologically active LPO product, CEP, and establishes the pathophysiological importance of this process.

As an oxidation fragment of DHA, which is abundant in retina and brain,42 CEP has been first shown to accumulate in retinas of patients with AMD.16,17,43 Multiple studies from several laboratories demonstrated that CEP exerts both proangiogenic and proinflammatory activities potentially related to pathogenesis of AMD.10,15,16,21–24,44,45 Moreover, the presence of CEP modifications as well as anti-CEP specific autoantibodies in plasmas of AMD patients were shown to serve as early signs of susceptibility to AMD,46 thereby underscoring the role of oxidized DHA products in this disease. Furthermore, more recent studies revealed the presence and biological significance of CEP modifications in other physiological and pathological conditions, such as tumor growth, atherosclerosis progression, and thrombosis.10,14,25 These studies emphasize an importance of the mechanism controlling CEP accumulation in tissues and suggest that defective CEP clearance might play a causative role in pathologies. Indeed, here we show that delayed clearance of CEP in Cd36−/− mice causes accelerated angiogenesis in vivo. Thus, the receptor-mediated CEP scavenging might serve as a potential therapeutic target for conditions associated with excessive oxidative stress, such as AMD or atherothrombosis.

The receptor-mediated specific recognition and clearance of LPO products in tissues represents a novel host defense mechanism which differs from well-known processes of reactive oxygen species neutralization by enzymatic and nonenzymatic antioxidants.7 Interestingly, besides CEP, an alternative cleavage of DHA can give rise to EP, a modification similar to CEP. The only structural difference between CEP and EP is a presence of a carboxyl group in CEP, which seems to be essential for its recognition by macrophages. Thus, macrophages do not merely recognize any modified or denatured proteins, but bind to and scavenge a class of well-defined chemical moieties, that is, carboxyethylpyrrole, which might be present either on proteins10 or lipids.15

We demonstrate that macrophages are specifically responsible for CEP recognition and clearance. Our data suggest that macrophages might metabolize CEP in lysosomes after uptake because CEP staining is merged with that of CD68, a lysosome marker.31,32 This suggests that CEP, which is believed to be a stable end product of DHA oxidation can be further degraded. Moreover, differential CEP binding and scavenging activities of F4/80hi versus F4/80lo and M1- versus M2-like macrophages suggest that CEP clearance is mainly mediated by noninflammatory macrophages, but not by activated macrophages.27–29 This is also supported by the results of in vivo wound healing experiments, where CEP is scavenged as early as at day 3 before the arrival of blood monocytes. The latter cells are known to express Ly-6C at high levels and F4/80 at low levels and to exhibit proinflammatory functions.47–49 Wound macrophages undergo a transition from a high to a low level of Ly-6C as wound healing progresses,50 supporting the idea that CEP clearance within the first 3 days is mainly mediated by resident macrophages. It seems that these macrophage populations might tip the balance toward either excessive or insufficient CEP levels, which, in turn, might define the spectrum and severity of angiogenic and inflammatory processes in vivo.

On macrophages, CEP binds to 2 main receptors, CD36 and TLR2, the latter has been shown to mediate activities of CEP-containing protein14,45 as well as lipid15 modifications on other cell types. The fact that the defects of DKO macrophages were more severe than those of Cd36−/− or Tlr2−/− macrophages supports a possibility that CD36 and TLR2 play independent roles in CEP clearance. Interestingly, in contrast to many other ligands of TLR2, such as Pam3CSK4 and Lipoteichoic acid, this process does not involve CD14.51,52 Instead, it depends on CD36, another TLR2 coreceptor, known to mediate TLR2/TLR6 rather than TLR2/TLR1 functions.52 In agreement with previous studies,38,41 it seems that during the scavenging of CEP modifications, CD36 operates with TLR2/TLR6 heterodimers, whereas the CEP signaling seems to be dependent on TLR2/TLR1.15,45 Also known as a scavenger receptor, CD36 recognizes misfolded proteins and specific lipid modifications,35 including intermediate products of DHA oxidation, which serve as precursors of CEP and are known to play a causative role in atherosclerosis and thrombosis.36,53 Similar to TLR2, the recognition of CEP by CD36 is highly specific for carboxyalkylpyrrole because EP modifications are not recognized by either receptor. Therefore, CD36 might play a dual role in the metabolism of DHA oxidation products and in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis in general, first, by mediating foam cell formation and thrombosis triggered by intermediate products of DHA oxidation, and, second, by facilitating the removal of the end products of this oxidation pathway.

CD36, as a receptor for thrombospondin, has been shown to serve as a negative regulator of angiogenesis.54 This function might be context dependent because thrombospondin-1/thrombospondin-2 DKO mice were reported not to exhibit increased vascularity or accelerated wound healing when compared with WT controls.55 Moreover, both wound closure and leukocyte recruitment over a 9-day period after injury in Cd36−/− mice were shown to be comparable with that in WT.56 This is consistent with our study (Online Figure VIII). However, 3 days after injury, wounds of Cd36−/− mice had more CEP than WT, which, in turn, accelerated vascularization and wound closure. If CEP is neutralized, these differences were no longer apparent, thereby demonstrating a causative role for CEP in this process. It might be plausible that at the later time points other CD36-dependent functions, including removal of apoptotic cells by macrophages, might slow down the wound closure rate in Cd36−/− mice when compared with WT. Nevertheless, delayed CEP clearance in Cd36−/− mice leads to accelerated angiogenesis and faster wound closure during the early and important phase of wound healing. In conclusion, this study underscores the role of endogenous metabolites of LPO in pathophysiology and demonstrates that the cellular processes naturally controlling their levels in tissues might serve as promising targets for the development of future therapeutic interventions.

Acknowledgments

We thank Nickolas Tomko for help with reagents, Dr Maria Febbraio for providing Cd36−/− mice, Mira Tischenko for technical assistance with caring for mice and parts of histology, and Dr Bethany A. Kerr and Emelye Crehore for assistance in editing the article.

Sources of Funding

This work was supported by an endowed chair fund and in part by a National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant HL071625 to T.V. Byzova, an American Heart Association postdoctoral Fellowship 13POST14570001 to Y.W. Kim, by NIH grants DK102020 to V.P. Yakubenko, HL077213 to E.A. Podrez, and EY016813 and GM021249 to R.G. Salomon.

Disclosures

None.

Footnotes

  • In April 2015, the average time from submission to first decision for all original research papers submitted to Circulation Research was 13.84 days.

  • The online-only Data Supplement is available with this article at http://circres.ahajournals.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.305925/-/DC1.

  • Nonstandard Abbreviations and Acronyms
    AMD
    age-related macular degeneration
    CEP
    2-(ω-carboxyethyl)pyrrole
    DHA
    docosahexaenoic acid
    DKO
    double knockout
    EP
    ethylpyrrole
    LPO
    lipid peroxidation
    R-MPM
    resident mouse peritoneal macrophage
    TLR
    toll-like receptor
    WD
    Western diet
    WT
    wild-type

  • Received December 23, 2014.
  • Revision received May 8, 2015.
  • Accepted May 12, 2015.
  • © 2015 American Heart Association, Inc.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Benz CC,
    2. Yau C
    . Ageing, oxidative stress and cancer: paradigms in parallax. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8:875–879. doi: 10.1038/nrc2522.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Kim YW,
    2. Byzova TV
    . Oxidative stress in angiogenesis and vascular disease. Blood. 2014;123:625–631. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-09-512749.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Kim YW,
    2. West XZ,
    3. Byzova TV
    . Inflammation and oxidative stress in angiogenesis and vascular disease. J Mol Med (Berl). 2013;91:323–328. doi: 10.1007/s00109-013-1007-3.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Reuter S,
    2. Gupta SC,
    3. Chaturvedi MM,
    4. Aggarwal BB
    . Oxidative stress, inflammation, and cancer: how are they linked? Free Radic Biol Med. 2010;49:1603–1616. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2010.09.006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Negre-Salvayre A,
    2. Auge N,
    3. Ayala V,
    4. et al
    . Pathological aspects of lipid peroxidation. Free Radic Res. 2010;44:1125–1171. doi: 10.3109/10715762.2010.498478.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Sies H
    . Oxidative stress: oxidants and antioxidants. Exp Physiol. 1997;82:291–295.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Guéraud F,
    2. Atalay M,
    3. Bresgen N,
    4. Cipak A,
    5. Eckl PM,
    6. Huc L,
    7. Jouanin I,
    8. Siems W,
    9. Uchida K
    . Chemistry and biochemistry of lipid peroxidation products. Free Radic Res. 2010;44:1098–1124. doi: 10.3109/10715762.2010.498477.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Cutler RG,
    2. Mattson MP
    . The adversities of aging. Ageing Res Rev. 2006;5:221–238. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2006.05.002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Canton J,
    2. Neculai D,
    3. Grinstein S
    . Scavenger receptors in homeostasis and immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2013;13:621–634. doi: 10.1038/nri3515.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Salomon RG,
    2. Hong L,
    3. Hollyfield JG
    . Discovery of carboxyethylpyrroles (CEPs): critical insights into AMD, autism, cancer, and wound healing from basic research on the chemistry of oxidized phospholipids. Chem Res Toxicol. 2011;24:1803–1816. doi: 10.1021/tx200206v.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Siddiqui RA,
    2. Harvey K,
    3. Stillwell W
    . Anticancer properties of oxidation products of docosahexaenoic acid. Chem Phys Lipids. 2008;153:47–56. doi: 10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2008.02.009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Hollyfield JG,
    2. Bonilha VL,
    3. Rayborn ME,
    4. Yang X,
    5. Shadrach KG,
    6. Lu L,
    7. Ufret RL,
    8. Salomon RG,
    9. Perez VL
    . Oxidative damage-induced inflammation initiates age-related macular degeneration. Nat Med. 2008;14:194–198. doi: 10.1038/nm1709.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Renganathan K,
    2. Gu J,
    3. Rayborn ME,
    4. Crabb JS,
    5. Salomon RG,
    6. Collier RJ,
    7. Kapin MA,
    8. Romano C,
    9. Hollyfield JG,
    10. Crabb JW
    . CEP biomarkers as potential tools for monitoring therapeutics. PLoS One. 2013;8:e76325. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076325.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. West XZ,
    2. Malinin NL,
    3. Merkulova AA,
    4. Tischenko M,
    5. Kerr BA,
    6. Borden EC,
    7. Podrez EA,
    8. Salomon RG,
    9. Byzova TV
    . Oxidative stress induces angiogenesis by activating TLR2 with novel endogenous ligands. Nature. 2010;467:972–976. doi: 10.1038/nature09421.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Wang H,
    2. Guo J,
    3. West X,
    4. Bid HK,
    5. Lu L,
    6. Hong L,
    7. Jang GF,
    8. Zhang L,
    9. Crabb JW,
    10. Linetsky MD,
    11. Salomon RG
    . Detection and biological activities of carboxyethylpyrrole ethanolamine phospholipids: a correlation with age-related macular degeneration. Chemical Res Toxicol. 2014;27(12):2015–2022. doi: 10.1021/tx500216a.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Crabb JW,
    2. Miyagi M,
    3. Gu X,
    4. Shadrach K,
    5. West KA,
    6. Sakaguchi H,
    7. Kamei M,
    8. Hasan A,
    9. Yan L,
    10. Rayborn ME,
    11. Salomon RG,
    12. Hollyfield JG
    . Drusen proteome analysis: an approach to the etiology of age-related macular degeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:14682–14687. doi: 10.1073/pnas.222551899.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Gu X,
    2. Meer SG,
    3. Miyagi M,
    4. Rayborn ME,
    5. Hollyfield JG,
    6. Crabb JW,
    7. Salomon RG
    . Carboxyethylpyrrole protein adducts and autoantibodies, biomarkers for age-related macular degeneration. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:42027–42035. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M305460200.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Renganathan K,
    2. Ebrahem Q,
    3. Vasanji A,
    4. Gu X,
    5. Lu L,
    6. Sears J,
    7. Salomon RG,
    8. Anand-Apte B,
    9. Crabb JW
    . Carboxyethylpyrrole adducts, age-related macular degeneration and neovascularization. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2008;613:261–267. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-74904-4_30.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Gu J,
    2. Pauer GJ,
    3. Yue X,
    4. Narendra U,
    5. Sturgill GM,
    6. Bena J,
    7. Gu X,
    8. Peachey NS,
    9. Salomon RG,
    10. Hagstrom SA,
    11. Crabb JW
    ; Clinical Genomic and Proteomic AMD Study Group. Assessing susceptibility to age-related macular degeneration with proteomic and genomic biomarkers. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2009;8:1338–1349. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M800453-MCP200.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Mukhopadhyay S,
    2. Plüddemann A,
    3. Gordon S
    . Macrophage pattern recognition receptors in immunity, homeostasis and self tolerance. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2009;653:1–14.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Cruz-Guilloty F,
    2. Saeed AM,
    3. Echegaray JJ,
    4. et al
    . Infiltration of proinflammatory m1 macrophages into the outer retina precedes damage in a mouse model of age-related macular degeneration. Int J Inflam. 2013;2013:503725. doi: 10.1155/2013/503725.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Cruz-Guilloty F,
    2. Saeed AM,
    3. Duffort S,
    4. Cano M,
    5. Ebrahimi KB,
    6. Ballmick A,
    7. Tan Y,
    8. Wang H,
    9. Laird JM,
    10. Salomon RG,
    11. Handa JT,
    12. Perez VL
    . T cells and macrophages responding to oxidative damage cooperate in pathogenesis of a mouse model of age-related macular degeneration. PLoS One. 2014;9:e88201. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088201.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Ebrahem Q,
    2. Renganathan K,
    3. Sears J,
    4. Vasanji A,
    5. Gu X,
    6. Lu L,
    7. Salomon RG,
    8. Crabb JW,
    9. Anand-Apte B
    . Carboxyethylpyrrole oxidative protein modifications stimulate neovascularization: Implications for age-related macular degeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:13480–13484. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0601552103.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Doyle SL,
    2. Campbell M,
    3. Ozaki E,
    4. Salomon RG,
    5. Mori A,
    6. Kenna PF,
    7. Farrar GJ,
    8. Kiang AS,
    9. Humphries MM,
    10. Lavelle EC,
    11. O’Neill LA,
    12. Hollyfield JG,
    13. Humphries P
    . NLRP3 has a protective role in age-related macular degeneration through the induction of IL-18 by drusen components. Nat Med. 2012;18:791–798. doi: 10.1038/nm.2717.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Panigrahi S,
    2. Ma Y,
    3. Hong L,
    4. Gao D,
    5. West XZ,
    6. Salomon RG,
    7. Byzova TV,
    8. Podrez EA
    . Engagement of platelet toll-like receptor 9 by novel endogenous ligands promotes platelet hyperreactivity and thrombosis. Circ Res. 2013;112:103–112. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.112.274241.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Murray PJ,
    2. Wynn TA
    . Protective and pathogenic functions of macrophage subsets. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011;11:723–737. doi: 10.1038/nri3073.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Biswas SK,
    2. Mantovani A
    . Macrophage plasticity and interaction with lymphocyte subsets: cancer as a paradigm. Nat Immunol. 2010;11:889–896. doi: 10.1038/ni.1937.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Nguyen HH,
    2. Tran BT,
    3. Muller W,
    4. Jack RS
    . IL-10 acts as a developmental switch guiding monocyte differentiation to macrophages during a murine peritoneal infection. J Immunol. 2012;189:3112–3120. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1200360.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Ghosn EE,
    2. Cassado AA,
    3. Govoni GR,
    4. Fukuhara T,
    5. Yang Y,
    6. Monack DM,
    7. Bortoluci KR,
    8. Almeida SR,
    9. Herzenberg LA,
    10. Herzenberg LA
    . Two physically, functionally, and developmentally distinct peritoneal macrophage subsets. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:2568–2573. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0915000107.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Schreml S,
    2. Szeimies RM,
    3. Prantl L,
    4. Karrer S,
    5. Landthaler M,
    6. Babilas P
    . Oxygen in acute and chronic wound healing. Br J Dermatol. 2010;163:257–268. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.09804.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Saito N,
    2. Pulford KA,
    3. Breton-Gorius J,
    4. Massé JM,
    5. Mason DY,
    6. Cramer EM
    . Ultrastructural localization of the CD68 macrophage-associated antigen in human blood neutrophils and monocytes. Am J Pathol. 1991;139:1053–1059.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Ramprasad MP,
    2. Terpstra V,
    3. Kondratenko N,
    4. Quehenberger O,
    5. Steinberg D
    . Cell surface expression of mouse macrosialin and human CD68 and their role as macrophage receptors for oxidized low density lipoprotein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93:14833–14838.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    1. Zeisberger SM,
    2. Odermatt B,
    3. Marty C,
    4. Zehnder-Fjällman AH,
    5. Ballmer-Hofer K,
    6. Schwendener RA
    . Clodronate-liposome-mediated depletion of tumour-associated macrophages: a new and highly effective antiangiogenic therapy approach. Br J Cancer. 2006;95:272–281. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603240.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Feng W,
    2. McCabe NP,
    3. Mahabeleshwar GH,
    4. Somanath PR,
    5. Phillips DR,
    6. Byzova TV
    . The angiogenic response is dictated by beta3 integrin on bone marrow-derived cells. J Cell Biol. 2008;183:1145–1157. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200802179.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    1. Silverstein RL,
    2. Febbraio M
    . CD36, a scavenger receptor involved in immunity, metabolism, angiogenesis, and behavior. Sci Signal. 2009;2:re3. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.272re3.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    1. Podrez EA,
    2. Poliakov E,
    3. Shen Z,
    4. Zhang R,
    5. Deng Y,
    6. Sun M,
    7. Finton PJ,
    8. Shan L,
    9. Febbraio M,
    10. Hajjar DP,
    11. Silverstein RL,
    12. Hoff HF,
    13. Salomon RG,
    14. Hazen SL
    . A novel family of atherogenic oxidized phospholipids promotes macrophage foam cell formation via the scavenger receptor CD36 and is enriched in atherosclerotic lesions. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:38517–38523. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M205924200.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. 37.↵
    1. Martin C,
    2. Chevrot M,
    3. Poirier H,
    4. Passilly-Degrace P,
    5. Niot I,
    6. Besnard P
    . CD36 as a lipid sensor. Physiol Behav. 2011;105:36–42. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.02.029.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    1. Triantafilou M,
    2. Gamper FG,
    3. Haston RM,
    4. Mouratis MA,
    5. Morath S,
    6. Hartung T,
    7. Triantafilou K
    . Membrane sorting of toll-like receptor (TLR)-2/6 and TLR2/1 heterodimers at the cell surface determines heterotypic associations with CD36 and intracellular targeting. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:31002–31011. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M602794200.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    1. Kar NS,
    2. Ashraf MZ,
    3. Valiyaveettil M,
    4. Podrez EA
    . Mapping and characterization of the binding site for specific oxidized phospholipids and oxidized low density lipoprotein of scavenger receptor CD36. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:8765–8771. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M709195200.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. 40.↵
    1. Qiao L,
    2. Zou C,
    3. Shao P,
    4. Schaack J,
    5. Johnson PF,
    6. Shao J
    . Transcriptional regulation of fatty acid translocase/CD36 expression by CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein alpha. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:8788–8795. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M800055200.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. 41.↵
    1. Hoebe K,
    2. Georgel P,
    3. Rutschmann S,
    4. Du X,
    5. Mudd S,
    6. Crozat K,
    7. Sovath S,
    8. Shamel L,
    9. Hartung T,
    10. Zähringer U,
    11. Beutler B
    . CD36 is a sensor of diacylglycerides. Nature. 2005;433:523–527. doi: 10.1038/nature03253.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. 42.↵
    1. Neuringer M,
    2. Anderson GJ,
    3. Connor WE
    . The essentiality of n-3 fatty acids for the development and function of the retina and brain. Annu Rev Nutr. 1988;8:517–541. doi: 10.1146/annurev.nu.08.070188.002505.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. 43.↵
    1. Hollyfield JG,
    2. Salomon RG,
    3. Crabb JW
    . Proteomic approaches to understanding age-related macular degeneration. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2003;533:83–89.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. 44.↵
    1. Lu L,
    2. Gu X,
    3. Hong L,
    4. Laird J,
    5. Jaffe K,
    6. Choi J,
    7. Crabb J,
    8. Salomon RG
    . Synthesis and structural characterization of carboxyethylpyrrole-modified proteins: mediators of age-related macular degeneration. Bioorg Med Chem. 2009;17:7548–7561. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2009.09.009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. 45.↵
    1. Saeed AM,
    2. Duffort S,
    3. Ivanov D,
    4. Wang H,
    5. Laird JM,
    6. Salomon RG,
    7. Cruz-Guilloty F,
    8. Perez VL
    . The oxidative stress product carboxyethylpyrrole potentiates TLR2/TLR1 inflammatory signaling in macrophages. PLoS One. 2014;9:e106421. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106421.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. 46.↵
    1. Gu J,
    2. Pauer GJ,
    3. Yue X,
    4. Narendra U,
    5. Sturgill GM,
    6. Bena J,
    7. Gu X,
    8. Peachey NS,
    9. Salomon RG,
    10. Hagstrom SA,
    11. Crabb JW
    ; Clinical Genomic and Proteomic AMD Study Group. Proteomic and genomic biomarkers for age-related macular degeneration. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2010;664:411–417. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-1399-9_47.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. 47.↵
    1. Sunderkötter C,
    2. Nikolic T,
    3. Dillon MJ,
    4. Van Rooijen N,
    5. Stehling M,
    6. Drevets DA,
    7. Leenen PJ
    . Subpopulations of mouse blood monocytes differ in maturation stage and inflammatory response. J Immunol. 2004;172:4410–4417.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. 48.↵
    1. Shi C,
    2. Pamer EG
    . Monocyte recruitment during infection and inflammation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011;11:762–774. doi: 10.1038/nri3070.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. 49.↵
    1. Brancato SK,
    2. Albina JE
    . Wound macrophages as key regulators of repair: origin, phenotype, and function. Am J Pathol. 2011;178:19–25. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2010.08.003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. 50.↵
    1. Koh TJ,
    2. DiPietro LA
    . Inflammation and wound healing: the role of the macrophage. Expert Rev Mol Med. 2011;13:e23. doi: 10.1017/S1462399411001943.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. 51.↵
    1. Akashi-Takamura S,
    2. Miyake K
    . TLR accessory molecules. Curr Opin Immunol. 2008;20:420–425. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2008.07.001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. 52.↵
    1. Lee CC,
    2. Avalos AM,
    3. Ploegh HL
    . Accessory molecules for Toll-like receptors and their function. Nat Rev Immunol. 2012;12:168–179. doi: 10.1038/nri3151.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. 53.↵
    1. Podrez EA,
    2. Byzova TV,
    3. Febbraio M,
    4. Salomon RG,
    5. Ma Y,
    6. Valiyaveettil M,
    7. Poliakov E,
    8. Sun M,
    9. Finton PJ,
    10. Curtis BR,
    11. Chen J,
    12. Zhang R,
    13. Silverstein RL,
    14. Hazen SL
    . Platelet CD36 links hyperlipidemia, oxidant stress and a prothrombotic phenotype. Nat Med. 2007;13:1086–1095. doi: 10.1038/nm1626.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. 54.↵
    1. Simantov R,
    2. Silverstein RL
    . CD36: a critical anti-angiogenic receptor. Front Biosci. 2003;8:s874–s882.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. 55.↵
    1. Agah A,
    2. Kyriakides TR,
    3. Lawler J,
    4. Bornstein P
    . The lack of thrombospondin-1 (TSP1) dictates the course of wound healing in double-TSP1/TSP2-null mice. Am J Pathol. 2002;161:831–839. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64243-5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. 56.↵
    1. Greenberg ME,
    2. Sun M,
    3. Zhang R,
    4. Febbraio M,
    5. Silverstein R,
    6. Hazen SL
    . Oxidized phosphatidylserine-CD36 interactions play an essential role in macrophage-dependent phagocytosis of apoptotic cells. J Exp Med. 2006;203:2613–2625. doi: 10.1084/jem.20060370.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text

Novelty and Significance

What Is Known?

  • Reactive oxygen species generate a range of secondary toxic products from phospholipids, including carboxy ethyl pyrrole (CEP).

  • CEP has been shown to promote vascularization and inflammation.

  • CEP is believed to be a final and stable product of phospholipid oxidation; implying that it could accumulate in tissues for years.

What New Information Does This Article Contribute?

  • Proteins modified by oxidized phospholipid products, CEP, are only transiently present during wound healing, whereas they are continuously accumulated in atherosclerotic lesions and growing tumors.

  • These oxidation products are recognized, scavenged, and metabolized by macrophages, which control CEP levels in tissues.

  • CEP, but not structurally similar modifications, bind to CD36 toll-like receptors 2 and 6 with high specificity.

Oxidative stress is a key determinant of cardiovascular diseases and aging. It results in tissue accumulation of chemically modified products with both, physiological and pathological activities. Although some of these products are essential for tissue repair processes, their excessive accumulation could lead to tissue injury. We found that CEP modifications are recognized and metabolized by tissue macrophages. During wound healing, tissue macrophages are responsible for the clearance of CEP modifications. This process is highly selective for CEP products and it involves specific innate immunity receptors on macrophages. This detoxification process represents a novel natural defense mechanism against uncontrolled accumulation of oxidized chemicals.

View Abstract
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

Circulation Research
July 31, 2015, Volume 117, Issue 4
  • Table of Contents
Previous ArticleNext Article

Jump to

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Sources of Funding
    • Disclosures
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Supplemental Materials
  • Info & Metrics

Article Tools

  • Print
  • Citation Tools
    Receptor-Mediated Mechanism Controlling Tissue Levels of Bioactive Lipid Oxidation ProductsNovelty and Significance
    Young-Woong Kim, Valentin P. Yakubenko, Xiaoxia Z. West, Gabriel B. Gugiu, Kutralanathan Renganathan, Sudipta Biswas, Detao Gao, John W. Crabb, Robert G. Salomon, Eugene A. Podrez and Tatiana V. Byzova
    Circulation Research. 2015;117:321-332, originally published May 12, 2015
    https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.305925

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
  •  Download Powerpoint
  • Article Alerts
    Log in to Email Alerts with your email address.
  • Save to my folders

Share this Article

  • Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Circulation Research.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Receptor-Mediated Mechanism Controlling Tissue Levels of Bioactive Lipid Oxidation ProductsNovelty and Significance
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from Circulation Research
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the Circulation Research web site.
  • Share on Social Media
    Receptor-Mediated Mechanism Controlling Tissue Levels of Bioactive Lipid Oxidation ProductsNovelty and Significance
    Young-Woong Kim, Valentin P. Yakubenko, Xiaoxia Z. West, Gabriel B. Gugiu, Kutralanathan Renganathan, Sudipta Biswas, Detao Gao, John W. Crabb, Robert G. Salomon, Eugene A. Podrez and Tatiana V. Byzova
    Circulation Research. 2015;117:321-332, originally published May 12, 2015
    https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.305925
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

Related Articles

Cited By...

Subjects

  • Genetics
    • Genetically Altered and Transgenic Models
  • Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research
    • Metabolism
    • Oxidant Stress
    • Vascular Biology
    • Angiogenesis

Circulation Research

  • About Circulation Research
  • Editorial Board
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Abstract Supplements
  • AHA Statements and Guidelines
  • Permissions
  • Reprints
  • Email Alerts
  • Open Access Information
  • AHA Journals RSS
  • AHA Newsroom

Editorial Office Address:
3355 Keswick Rd
Main Bldg 103
Baltimore, MD 21211
CircRes@circresearch.org

Information for:
  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Subscriber Help
  • Institutions / Librarians
  • Institutional Subscriptions FAQ
  • International Users
American Heart Association Learn and Live
National Center
7272 Greenville Ave.
Dallas, TX 75231

Customer Service

  • 1-800-AHA-USA-1
  • 1-800-242-8721
  • Local Info
  • Contact Us

About Us

Our mission is to build healthier lives, free of cardiovascular diseases and stroke. That single purpose drives all we do. The need for our work is beyond question. Find Out More about the American Heart Association

  • Careers
  • SHOP
  • Latest Heart and Stroke News
  • AHA/ASA Media Newsroom

Our Sites

  • American Heart Association
  • American Stroke Association
  • For Professionals
  • More Sites

Take Action

  • Advocate
  • Donate
  • Planned Giving
  • Volunteer

Online Communities

  • AFib Support
  • Garden Community
  • Patient Support Network
  • Professional Online Network

Follow Us:

  • Follow Circulation on Twitter
  • Visit Circulation on Facebook
  • Follow Circulation on Google Plus
  • Follow Circulation on Instagram
  • Follow Circulation on Pinterest
  • Follow Circulation on YouTube
  • Rss Feeds
  • Privacy Policy
  • Copyright
  • Ethics Policy
  • Conflict of Interest Policy
  • Linking Policy
  • Diversity
  • Careers

©2018 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. The American Heart Association is a qualified 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization.
*Red Dress™ DHHS, Go Red™ AHA; National Wear Red Day ® is a registered trademark.

  • PUTTING PATIENTS FIRST National Health Council Standards of Excellence Certification Program
  • BBB Accredited Charity
  • Comodo Secured