Skip to main content
  • American Heart Association
  • Science Volunteer
  • Warning Signs
  • Advanced Search
  • Donate

  • Home
  • About this Journal
    • Editorial Board
    • Meet the Editors
    • Editorial Manifesto
    • Impact Factor
    • Journal History
    • General Statistics
  • All Issues
  • Subjects
    • All Subjects
    • Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research
    • Critical Care and Resuscitation
    • Epidemiology, Lifestyle, and Prevention
    • Genetics
    • Heart Failure and Cardiac Disease
    • Hypertension
    • Imaging and Diagnostic Testing
    • Intervention, Surgery, Transplantation
    • Quality and Outcomes
    • Stroke
    • Vascular Disease
  • Browse Features
    • Circulation Research Profiles
    • Trainees & Young Investigators
    • Research Around the World
    • News & Views
    • The NHLBI Page
    • Viewpoints
    • Compendia
    • Reviews
    • Recent Review Series
    • Profiles in Cardiovascular Science
    • Leaders in Cardiovascular Science
    • Commentaries on Cutting Edge Science
    • AHA/BCVS Scientific Statements
    • Abstract Supplements
    • Circulation Research Classics
    • In This Issue Archive
    • Anthology of Images
  • Resources
    • Online Submission/Peer Review
    • Why Submit to Circulation Research
    • Instructions for Authors
    • → Article Types
    • → Manuscript Preparation
    • → Submission Tips
    • → Journal Policies
    • Circulation Research Awards
    • Image Gallery
    • Council on Basic Cardiovascular Sciences
    • Customer Service & Ordering Info
    • International Users
  • AHA Journals
    • AHA Journals Home
    • Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology (ATVB)
    • Circulation
    • → Circ: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • → Circ: Genomic and Precision Medicine
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Imaging
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Interventions
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes
    • → Circ: Heart Failure
    • Circulation Research
    • Hypertension
    • Stroke
    • Journal of the American Heart Association
  • Impact Factor 13.965
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

  • My alerts
  • Sign In
  • Join

  • Advanced search

Header Publisher Menu

  • American Heart Association
  • Science Volunteer
  • Warning Signs
  • Advanced Search
  • Donate

Circulation Research

  • My alerts
  • Sign In
  • Join

  • Impact Factor 13.965
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Home
  • About this Journal
    • Editorial Board
    • Meet the Editors
    • Editorial Manifesto
    • Impact Factor
    • Journal History
    • General Statistics
  • All Issues
  • Subjects
    • All Subjects
    • Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research
    • Critical Care and Resuscitation
    • Epidemiology, Lifestyle, and Prevention
    • Genetics
    • Heart Failure and Cardiac Disease
    • Hypertension
    • Imaging and Diagnostic Testing
    • Intervention, Surgery, Transplantation
    • Quality and Outcomes
    • Stroke
    • Vascular Disease
  • Browse Features
    • Circulation Research Profiles
    • Trainees & Young Investigators
    • Research Around the World
    • News & Views
    • The NHLBI Page
    • Viewpoints
    • Compendia
    • Reviews
    • Recent Review Series
    • Profiles in Cardiovascular Science
    • Leaders in Cardiovascular Science
    • Commentaries on Cutting Edge Science
    • AHA/BCVS Scientific Statements
    • Abstract Supplements
    • Circulation Research Classics
    • In This Issue Archive
    • Anthology of Images
  • Resources
    • Online Submission/Peer Review
    • Why Submit to Circulation Research
    • Instructions for Authors
    • → Article Types
    • → Manuscript Preparation
    • → Submission Tips
    • → Journal Policies
    • Circulation Research Awards
    • Image Gallery
    • Council on Basic Cardiovascular Sciences
    • Customer Service & Ordering Info
    • International Users
  • AHA Journals
    • AHA Journals Home
    • Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology (ATVB)
    • Circulation
    • → Circ: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • → Circ: Genomic and Precision Medicine
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Imaging
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Interventions
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes
    • → Circ: Heart Failure
    • Circulation Research
    • Hypertension
    • Stroke
    • Journal of the American Heart Association
Report

Human Embryonic Stem Cell–Derived Cardiomyocytes and Cardiac Repair in Rodents

Linda W. van Laake, Robert Passier, Pieter A. Doevendans, Christine L. Mummery
Download PDF
https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.175505
Circulation Research. 2008;102:1008-1010
Originally published May 8, 2008
Linda W. van Laake
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert Passier
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pieter A. Doevendans
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christine L. Mummery
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Supplemental Materials
  • Info & Metrics

Jump to

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Sources of Funding
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Supplemental Materials
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
Loading

Abstract

Cell transplantation may restore heart function in disease associated with loss or dysfunction of cardiomyocytes. Recently, Laflamme et al reported an improvement in cardiac function in immunodeficient rats 4 weeks after coronary artery ligation and injection of human embryonic stem cell–derived cardiomyocytes (hESC-CMs). We have recently carried out a comparable study transplanting hESC-CMs to the hearts of mice with myocardial infarction. Our findings were similar up to the 4-week time point, with significant improvements in cardiac function. However, our follow-up was longer, and, at 3 months, the difference between mice receiving cardiomyocytes and those receiving other cells was no longer significant. Hypothesizing that the improvement observed by Laflamme et al may have been more likely to be sustained long term because the grafts in their study appeared larger, we injected 3 times as many cells. Although this resulted in a significantly increased graft size, we again observed a functional improvement at 1 month but not at 3 months. Our results show that midterm data in these kinds of experiments must be interpreted with caution and longer-term follow-up is essential to draw conclusions on the efficacy of cardiac cell transplantation. Furthermore, our findings demonstrate the unlikely success of merely generating and injecting more cells of the same type to increase functional improvement.

  • cell transplantation
  • MRI
  • myocardial infarction
  • stem cells

Human embryonic stem cell–derived cardiomyocytes (hESC-CMs) may have potential in replacing cardiomyocytes that are lost or dysfunctional in cardiac disease, such as myocardial infarction. Recently, Laflamme et al reported an improvement in cardiac function in immunodeficient rats 4 weeks after coronary artery ligation and injection of hESC-CMs 4 days later.1 In their careful evaluation, cardiomyocyte-specific effects were distinguished from general cell-based benefit by including a control group of rats that had received noncardiomyocyte derivatives from the same hESC line. This comparison showed that the observed functional enhancement was specifically attributable to cardiomyocyte-enriched differentiated hESCs.

Nevertheless, we would suggest a note of caution based on our own longer-term analysis of cardiac function in mice that have undergone similar transplantation with hESC-CMs. In that recently published study,2 we injected cardiomyocyte-enriched differentiated hESCs into uninjured and acutely infarcted hearts of immunodeficient NOD-SCID mice and performed a longitudinal follow-up of cardiac function by MRI.3 Like Laflamme et al, we found that hESC-CMs survived selectively and improved heart function 4 weeks after myocardial infarction when compared to noncardiac differentiated derivatives of hESCs.2 However, at the 12-week time point, cardiac function was not improved compared to the control animals,2 even though only cardiomyocytes had formed a substantial graft in the infarcted heart (Figure 1): 80% to 95% of the surviving donor cells had a cardiomyocyte phenotype. The remaining cells expressed the endoderm marker cytokeratin 8 (recognized by Troma-1). Only rarely (<1%) were cells positive for the endothelial cell marker von Willebrand factor (Figure I in the online data supplement, available at http://circres.ahajournals.org) or smooth muscle actin, whereas staining of the grafts for stem cell markers (Tra-1-60, Oct-4, and Sox-2) was negative in all cases.

Figure1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Figure 1. Section of mouse heart 12 weeks after induction of myocardial infarction, partly regenerated by cardiomyocyte-enriched differentiated hESCs. Nearly all surviving donor cells have a cardiomyocyte phenotype. a and b, Overview image of human GFP+ donor cells in the infarcted mouse heart tissue. c and d, Higher magnification of donor cells in a and b to show sarcomeres. Green indicates green fluorescent protein (GFP), expressed constitutively by all hESC-derived cells; red, α-actinin; blue, DNA (DAPI). Scale bars: 100 μm (a and b); 10 μm (c and d).

We quantified graft size based on a semiquantitative scaling (scale from 0 to 13) based on green fluorescent protein (GFP) fluorescence in the whole heart by a blinded investigator. In a subset of hearts (n=14), the absolute number of GFP fluorescent cells was also counted in sections by a different blinded investigator. We, thus, found that a semiquantitative score of 1 to 3 corresponded to 100 to 1000 cells, 4 to 6 to 1000 to 10 000 cells, and >7 to 10 000 to 100 000 cells.

A reduction in graft size from the 4- to the 12-week time point could account for the transient improvement in cardiac function. However, in a separate group of mice that underwent the same procedures but were euthanized after 4 weeks, the graft size was not significantly larger than that after 12 weeks (mean semiquantitative score, 5.75±0.92 versus 3.75±0.72, P=0.14, n=8 to 12 per group). We, therefore, repeated our initial study but now injecting 3 million cardiomyocyte-enriched differentiated hESCs intramyocardially at 3 different sites in the infarct and border zone, instead of 1 million cells in 1 injection. As expected, the total graft size increased proportionally (Figure 2). Although the resulting initial preservation of cardiac function, as measured by MRI, was present at 4 weeks, after a 12 weeks of follow-up, this had become insignificant in comparison with the control group (Figure 3a). To exclude the possibility that this was attributable to a negative effect of the injections themselves, we also injected infarcted mice with vehicle, or completely left out the injection step, and found no negative effect of intramyocardial injection on the function of the infarcted heart (supplement Table I). In addition, injection of either cardiomyocyte enriched– or cardiomyocyte negative– differentiated hESCs in infarcted mice improved their long-term survival compared to uninjected controls (Figure 3b).

Figure2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Figure 2. Grafts, identified by GFP fluorescence, 12 weeks after coronary artery ligation and intramyocardial injection of 1 million (a) or 3 million (b) cardiomyocyte-enriched differentiated hESCs. Scale bars=250 μm. c, Multiple injections of more cells significantly increased graft size. *P<0.05. SQU indicates semiquantitative units for graft size.

Figure3
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Figure 3. a, Cardiac function, measured by MRI, of postinfarcted mice treated with 1 million noncardiac hESC-derived cells or 3 million cardiomyocyte-enriched differentiated hESCs. EF indicates ejection fraction; SV, stroke volume; EDV, end-diastolic volume. *P<0.05. b, Survival curves of mice after myocardial infarction with or without injection of hESC-derived cells.

Some differences between ours and the study by Laflamme et al remain, as discussed by Rubart and Field,4 including the timing of cell injection and the use of a prosurvival cocktail. In the study by Laflamme et al, but not ours, the addition of prosurvival factors was necessary for graft survival in the infarcted heart. Although we demonstrate that a potential difference in graft size is unlikely to affect long-term outcome in these types of studies, there is a possibility that 1 or more components of the acute survival cocktail used would improve long-term myocyte function. Moreover, stimulating blood supply to the grafts may be necessary to improve donor cell function.

Our results show that midterm data in these kinds of experiments must be interpreted with caution and that longer-term follow-up is essential to draw conclusions on the efficacy of cardiac cell transplantation. Furthermore, our findings demonstrate that the expectation of sustained functional improvement by merely generating and injecting more cells of the same type is unlikely.

Nevertheless, both studies warrant optimism because of manifest graft survival, and with refined application methods or engineered scaffolds, stem cell–derived cardiomyocytes could be expected to restore long-term contractility to the damaged heart.

Sources of Funding

This work is supported by the European Community’s Sixth Framework Programme contract (‘HeartRepair’) LSHM-CT-2005-018630 (to L.W.v.L, R.P.) and by the Interuniversity Cardiology Institute of the Netherlands postdoctoral fellowship 2007-2008 (to L.W.v.L.).

Disclosures

None.

Footnotes

  • Original received March 12, 2008; revision received April 1, 2008; accepted April 10, 2008.

References

  1. ↵
    Laflamme MA, Chen KY, Naumova AV, Muskheli V, Fugate JA, Dupras SK, Reinecke H, Xu C, Hassanipour M, Police S, O’sullivan C, Collins L, Chen Y, Minami E, Gill EA, Ueno S, Yuan C, Gold J, Murry CE. Cardiomyocytes derived from human embryonic stem cells in pro-survival factors enhance function of infarcted rat hearts. Nat Biotechnol. 2007; 25: 1015–1024.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    van Laake LW, Passier R, Monshouwer-Kloots J, Verkleij AJ, Lips DJ, Freund C, Den Ouden K, Ward-van Oostwaard D, Korving J, Tertoolen LG, van Echteld CJ, Doevendans PA, Mummery CL. Human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes survive and mature in the mouse heart and transiently improve function after myocardial infarction. Stem Cell Res. 2007; 1: 9–24.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    van Laake LW, Passier R, Monshouwer-Kloots J, Nederhoff MG, Ward-van Oostwaard D, Field LJ, van Echteld CJ, Doevendans PA, Mummery CL. Monitoring of cell therapy and assessment of cardiac function using magnetic resonance imaging in a mouse model of myocardial infarction. Nat Protoc. 2007; 2: 2551–2567.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Rubart M, Field LJ. ES cells for troubled hearts. Nat Biotechnol. 2007; 25: 993–994.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

Circulation Research
May 9, 2008, Volume 102, Issue 9
  • Table of Contents
Previous ArticleNext Article

Jump to

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Sources of Funding
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Supplemental Materials
  • Info & Metrics

Article Tools

  • Print
  • Citation Tools
    Human Embryonic Stem Cell–Derived Cardiomyocytes and Cardiac Repair in Rodents
    Linda W. van Laake, Robert Passier, Pieter A. Doevendans and Christine L. Mummery
    Circulation Research. 2008;102:1008-1010, originally published May 8, 2008
    https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.175505

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
  •  Download Powerpoint
  • Article Alerts
    Log in to Email Alerts with your email address.
  • Save to my folders

Share this Article

  • Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Circulation Research.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Human Embryonic Stem Cell–Derived Cardiomyocytes and Cardiac Repair in Rodents
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from Circulation Research
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the Circulation Research web site.
  • Share on Social Media
    Human Embryonic Stem Cell–Derived Cardiomyocytes and Cardiac Repair in Rodents
    Linda W. van Laake, Robert Passier, Pieter A. Doevendans and Christine L. Mummery
    Circulation Research. 2008;102:1008-1010, originally published May 8, 2008
    https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.175505
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

Related Articles

Cited By...

Subjects

  • Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research
    • Animal Models of Human Disease

Circulation Research

  • About Circulation Research
  • Editorial Board
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Abstract Supplements
  • AHA Statements and Guidelines
  • Permissions
  • Reprints
  • Email Alerts
  • Open Access Information
  • AHA Journals RSS
  • AHA Newsroom

Editorial Office Address:
3355 Keswick Rd
Main Bldg 103
Baltimore, MD 21211
CircRes@circresearch.org

Information for:
  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Subscriber Help
  • Institutions / Librarians
  • Institutional Subscriptions FAQ
  • International Users
American Heart Association Learn and Live
National Center
7272 Greenville Ave.
Dallas, TX 75231

Customer Service

  • 1-800-AHA-USA-1
  • 1-800-242-8721
  • Local Info
  • Contact Us

About Us

Our mission is to build healthier lives, free of cardiovascular diseases and stroke. That single purpose drives all we do. The need for our work is beyond question. Find Out More about the American Heart Association

  • Careers
  • SHOP
  • Latest Heart and Stroke News
  • AHA/ASA Media Newsroom

Our Sites

  • American Heart Association
  • American Stroke Association
  • For Professionals
  • More Sites

Take Action

  • Advocate
  • Donate
  • Planned Giving
  • Volunteer

Online Communities

  • AFib Support
  • Garden Community
  • Patient Support Network
  • Professional Online Network

Follow Us:

  • Follow Circulation on Twitter
  • Visit Circulation on Facebook
  • Follow Circulation on Google Plus
  • Follow Circulation on Instagram
  • Follow Circulation on Pinterest
  • Follow Circulation on YouTube
  • Rss Feeds
  • Privacy Policy
  • Copyright
  • Ethics Policy
  • Conflict of Interest Policy
  • Linking Policy
  • Diversity
  • Careers

©2018 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. The American Heart Association is a qualified 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization.
*Red Dress™ DHHS, Go Red™ AHA; National Wear Red Day ® is a registered trademark.

  • PUTTING PATIENTS FIRST National Health Council Standards of Excellence Certification Program
  • BBB Accredited Charity
  • Comodo Secured