Skip to main content
  • American Heart Association
  • Science Volunteer
  • Warning Signs
  • Advanced Search
  • Donate

  • Home
  • About this Journal
    • Editorial Board
    • Meet the Editors
    • Editorial Manifesto
    • Impact Factor
    • Journal History
    • General Statistics
  • All Issues
  • Subjects
    • All Subjects
    • Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research
    • Critical Care and Resuscitation
    • Epidemiology, Lifestyle, and Prevention
    • Genetics
    • Heart Failure and Cardiac Disease
    • Hypertension
    • Imaging and Diagnostic Testing
    • Intervention, Surgery, Transplantation
    • Quality and Outcomes
    • Stroke
    • Vascular Disease
  • Browse Features
    • Circulation Research Profiles
    • Trainees & Young Investigators
    • Research Around the World
    • News & Views
    • The NHLBI Page
    • Viewpoints
    • Compendia
    • Reviews
    • Recent Review Series
    • Profiles in Cardiovascular Science
    • Leaders in Cardiovascular Science
    • Commentaries on Cutting Edge Science
    • AHA/BCVS Scientific Statements
    • Abstract Supplements
    • Circulation Research Classics
    • In This Issue Archive
    • Anthology of Images
  • Resources
    • Online Submission/Peer Review
    • Why Submit to Circulation Research
    • Instructions for Authors
    • → Article Types
    • → Manuscript Preparation
    • → Submission Tips
    • → Journal Policies
    • Circulation Research Awards
    • Image Gallery
    • Council on Basic Cardiovascular Sciences
    • Customer Service & Ordering Info
    • International Users
  • AHA Journals
    • AHA Journals Home
    • Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology (ATVB)
    • Circulation
    • → Circ: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • → Circ: Genomic and Precision Medicine
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Imaging
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Interventions
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes
    • → Circ: Heart Failure
    • Circulation Research
    • Hypertension
    • Stroke
    • Journal of the American Heart Association
  • Impact Factor 13.965
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

  • My alerts
  • Sign In
  • Join

  • Advanced search

Header Publisher Menu

  • American Heart Association
  • Science Volunteer
  • Warning Signs
  • Advanced Search
  • Donate

Circulation Research

  • My alerts
  • Sign In
  • Join

  • Impact Factor 13.965
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Home
  • About this Journal
    • Editorial Board
    • Meet the Editors
    • Editorial Manifesto
    • Impact Factor
    • Journal History
    • General Statistics
  • All Issues
  • Subjects
    • All Subjects
    • Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research
    • Critical Care and Resuscitation
    • Epidemiology, Lifestyle, and Prevention
    • Genetics
    • Heart Failure and Cardiac Disease
    • Hypertension
    • Imaging and Diagnostic Testing
    • Intervention, Surgery, Transplantation
    • Quality and Outcomes
    • Stroke
    • Vascular Disease
  • Browse Features
    • Circulation Research Profiles
    • Trainees & Young Investigators
    • Research Around the World
    • News & Views
    • The NHLBI Page
    • Viewpoints
    • Compendia
    • Reviews
    • Recent Review Series
    • Profiles in Cardiovascular Science
    • Leaders in Cardiovascular Science
    • Commentaries on Cutting Edge Science
    • AHA/BCVS Scientific Statements
    • Abstract Supplements
    • Circulation Research Classics
    • In This Issue Archive
    • Anthology of Images
  • Resources
    • Online Submission/Peer Review
    • Why Submit to Circulation Research
    • Instructions for Authors
    • → Article Types
    • → Manuscript Preparation
    • → Submission Tips
    • → Journal Policies
    • Circulation Research Awards
    • Image Gallery
    • Council on Basic Cardiovascular Sciences
    • Customer Service & Ordering Info
    • International Users
  • AHA Journals
    • AHA Journals Home
    • Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology (ATVB)
    • Circulation
    • → Circ: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • → Circ: Genomic and Precision Medicine
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Imaging
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Interventions
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes
    • → Circ: Heart Failure
    • Circulation Research
    • Hypertension
    • Stroke
    • Journal of the American Heart Association
UltraRapid Communication

Autonomic Nerve Stimulation Reverses Ventricular Repolarization Sequence in Rabbit Hearts

Rajkumar Mantravadi, Bethann Gabris, Tong Liu, Bum-Rak Choi, William C. de Groat, G. André Ng, Guy Salama
Download PDF
https://doi.org/10.1161/01.RES.0000264101.06417.33
Circulation Research. 2007;100:e72-e80
Originally published April 12, 2007
Rajkumar Mantravadi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bethann Gabris
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tong Liu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bum-Rak Choi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
William C. de Groat
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G. André Ng
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Guy Salama
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics

Jump to

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
Loading

Abstract

Sympathetic activity and spatial dispersion of repolarization (DOR) have been implicated as mechanisms that promote arrhythmia vulnerability; yet there are no direct measurements of the effects of autonomic nerve stimulation on DOR. Rabbit hearts were perfused in a Langendorff apparatus with full sympathetic and parasympathetic innervation and were optically mapped to measure action potential durations and DOR (apex–base) over the left ventricles. DOR was measured under sinus rhythm, during bilateral sympathetic nerve stimulation (SNS) and right and/or left vagus nerve stimulation and was compared with DOR during isoproterenol (100 nmol/L) or acetylcholine (1 μmol/L) infusion. In sinus rhythm, repolarization started at the apex and systematically progressed toward the base. SNS (10 to 15 Hz) increased DOR by 29% (from Δaction potential duration=17±0.7 to −22±1.6 ms, n=6) and reversed DOR as the direction of repolarization from apex→base in sinus rhythm shifted to base→apex in 5 to 15 seconds after SNS. DOR flipped back to its sinus rhythm DOR pattern 115±15 seconds after the interruption of SNS. During right or left vagus nerve stimulation, there was no change in the direction of DOR, but bilateral vagus nerve stimulation increased and reversed DOR to base→apex direction. Infusion of isoproterenol or acetylcholine increased DOR but did not alter the direction of repolarization sequences. These findings demonstrate that bilateral autonomic activity (SNS or vagus nerve stimulation) cause reversible shifts of apex–base DOR and that the spatial heterogeneities of autonomic effects on the ventricles are most likely attributable to a greater innervation at the base than the apex of the heart.

  • autonomic nerve stimulation
  • sympathetic nerve stimulation
  • vagus nerve stimulation
  • dispersion of repolarization
  • action potential durations
  • optical mapping

Cardiac repolarization is the cumulative manifestation of ion channel kinetics, spatial distributions of channel expression, cell–cell coupling, and their modulation by autonomic nerve activity and circulating hormones. At the cellular level, repolarization is determined by the current amplitudes and activation and inactivation kinetics of ion channels, which in most mammalian hearts include: voltage-gated Na+ (INa) and L-type Ca2+ (ICa,L) channels, the fast and slow components of delayed rectifier K+ channels (IKr and IKs), and the fast component of the transient K+ channel (Ito,f).1–4 At the organ level, the dispersion of repolarization (DOR) is a measure of the nonuniformity of repolarization, most likely caused by regional differences in ion channel distribution from endocardium to epicardium5–7 and along the epicardium from apex to base of the ventricles.8–11

In hearts under sinus rhythm, repolarization sequences have been obtained from the surface of mouse,12,13 guinea pig,14–17 and rabbit18,19 hearts using optical mapping techniques. In all animal models tested thus far, repolarization was shown to proceed from the apex to the base of the heart and to be independent of the activation sequence and to depend on intrinsic differences of action potential durations (APDs).20 Transmural DOR was measured from isolated canine wedge preparations and found to differ significantly when paced on the endocardium (to mimic sinus rhythm) compared with epicardium.21

In vivo, adrenergic regulation of the heart occurs by 2 dominant mechanisms: (1) direct delivery of catecholamine through sympathetic nerve activity and (2) humoral secretion of catecholamine in the circulation by the adrenal glands. Humoral actions of catecholamine on cardiac electrophysiology can be investigated by infusing adrenergic agonists in the perfusion solution in animal studies or injections in the blood stream of volunteers.22,23 In contrast, studies on the effects of autonomic nerve activity on APD are sparse.24 and there are no reports on the neuromodulation of DOR.

Enhanced DOR and dynamic properties of APDs such as the steepness of the APD restitution kinetics curve and APD (or T wave) alternans have been shown to promote arrhythmias.25–27 Adrenergic agonists and/or autonomic imbalance may enhance DOR and promote T-wave alternans and/or steeper APD restitution curve by modulating ionic currents and their kinetics in a spatially heterogeneous manner and therefore alter repolarization dynamics.28 Transmural dispersions of repolarization have been implicated as a contributing factor to arrhythmia vulnerability in canine and human studies.5 There is also substantial evidence in support of enhanced DOR over the surface of the ventricles as a mechanism to increase the vulnerability to reentrant arrhythmia, in animal models and human hearts.13,26,29 Although there are no direct measurements of DOR and T-wave alternans during autonomic nerve activity, numerous studies have emphasized the importance of behavioral states and emotional stress (ie, high autonomic activity) as triggers of T-wave alternans, and risk for sudden cardiac death.30,31

In this report, we modified the isolated, innervated rabbit heart preparation reported by Ng et al,24 by preparing 2 perfusion circuits: 1 for the autonomic nerves, the other to perfuse the heart in a modified Langendorff apparatus that allowed us to maintain physiological pressure and flow rates to the heart. The arrangement improved the staining of the heart with a voltage-sensitive dye and the delivery drugs while retaining functional sympathetic and parasympathetic innervation for several hours. APDs and DOR were measured during bilateral sympathetic nerve stimulation (SNS) or during right or left or bilateral vagus nerve stimulation (VNS). Changes in bipolar electrograms and optical maps of APDs were measured continuously for up to 10 minutes before, during, and after SNS or VNS. The combination of optical mapping and intact, fully innervated heart preparation provide a unique tool to investigate important topics in neurocardiology.

Materials and Methods

Heart Preparations

Fully innervated rabbit hearts were isolated using a modified method of that described by Ng et al.24 Briefly, adult New Zealand White rabbits (3.5 to 4 kg, n=14) were premedicated with ketamine HCl (0.1 mg kg−1, SC; Hospira Inc) and Meditomidine (1 mg, SC; Pfizer) followed by general anesthesia induced and maintained by Diprivan (1 to 2 mg kg−1 IV; Astra Zeneca). Rabbits were ventilated after tracheotomy using a small-animal ventilator (60 breaths per minute; Harvard Apparatus Ltd, Edenbridge, Kent, UK) with an O2/air mixture. The vagus nerves were isolated, and the blood vessels leading to and from the ribcage were ligated and dissected. The rabbit was euthanized with sodium pentobarbital and portions of the rib cage were removed and the descending aorta was cannulated. The pericardium was cut, and ice-cold Tyrode’s solution was applied to the surface of the heart to preserve myocardial function. The preparation extending from the neck to thorax was dissected from surrounding tissues as described previously.24 An advantage of this nerve–heart preparation is that the peripheral vessels and baroreflexes are eliminated when the spinal cord is severed below the Medulla oblongata, and the heart and part of the rib cage are isolated (see Figure 1). All procedures were undertaken in accordance with the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 and the current Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals published by the National Institutes of Health (NIH Publication No. 85-23, revised 1985).

Figure1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Figure 1. Isolated innervated heart preparation. A, Side view of the heart–nerve preparation. The photograph shows the heart immobilized between a glass slide above and rubber slings (brown) below. This keeps the heart in position for optical mapping. B, Schematic of the isolated innervated heart preparation. The heart was placed in a custom-made chamber for optical mapping of APs. PA indicates pulmonary artery; LV, left ventricle; RV, right ventricle. The ascending aorta was perfused with a 5-F pulmonary wedge monitoring balloon catheter inserted into the right carotid artery. A quadripolar electrode was placed in the right ventricle via the pulmonary artery and used to pace the heart or measure a bipolar electrogram. A second quadripolar electrode was inserted in the spinal canal and used to stimulate the thoracic outflow of the sympathetic trunk at T2 level. C, Close-up view of the heart in position for optical mapping. Lowercase letters describe the following structures. a, Elastic rubber slings were placed posterior to the heart to immobilize the anterior surface against a glass slide. b, Thymus gland and associated fat pads. c, Glass slide with a transparent marker for exact positioning of the preparation. Note that the dark border has the dimensions of the optical field-of-view. d, Left anterior descending artery in the interventricular sulcus. e, Obtuse marginal artery. f, Left atrium. g, Right vagus nerve placed on stimulating electrodes. D, Schematic of the mapped region. The supine position of the heart held by rubber straps stabilizes an area of the left ventricle between the interventricular sulcus and the obtuse marginal artery that was mapped optically (area shown as a grid).

A new method was devised to improve dye and drug delivery to the heart and improve cardiac perfusion pressure and coronary flow rate. Two perfusion circuits were set up with 2 peristaltic pumps. One pump perfused the spinal cord from the descending aorta to the spinal artery, at low flow rates (10 to 15 mL/min). The other perfused the heart in a modified Langendorff apparatus at a higher constant flow rate (30 mL/min) by inserting a 5 French catheter (B. Braun Medical Inc, Bethlehem, Pa) up the ascending aorta above the aortic valve and inflating the balloon catheter to maintain perfusion pressure to the heart (65±5 mm Hg) and to separate the two perfusion circuits. This approach was critical to stain the heart with the voltage-sensitive dye, obtain reproducible drug actions at reasonable concentrations, and achieve physiological perfusion pressures to the heart and the spinal cord. The heart and nerves were perfused with Tyrode’s solution containing (in mmol/L): 130 NaCl, 24 NaHCO3, 1.0 CaCl2, 1.0 MgCl2, 4.0 KCl, 1.2 NaH2PO4, 20 dextrose, at pH 7.4, and gassed with 95% O2 plus 5% CO2 at 37±1°C. Hearts were stained with the voltage sensitive dye, di-4 ANEPPS (40 μL of a 1 mg/mL stock solution in dimethyl sulfoxide). Two methods were used in combination to reduce motion artifacts. (1) The heart was placed horizontally in a custom designed chamber with an adjustable base and 2 straps to hold a glass slide against the region of epicardium to mechanical immobilize the region viewed by the photodiode array (Figure 1). (2) Cytochalasin D was used sparingly at 2 μmol/L in the perfusate for 10 minutes, followed by washout. When applied in this manner, cytochalasin D reduced contractions for 20 to 30 minutes without altering action potential (AP) characteristics, conduction velocity, or repolarization.

Optical Apparatus

The optical apparatus was previously described.18 Briefly, light from two 100-W tungsten–halogen lamps was collimated and passed through 520±30-nm interference filters. Fluorescence emitted from the stained heart was collected with a camera lens. Fluorescence emission from the anterior region of heart was passed through a cutoff filter (610 nm; Omega Optical, Brattleboro, Vt) and focused on a 16×16 elements photodiode array (C4675-103; Hamamatsu Corp, Bridgewater, NJ) (Figure 1). Outputs from the photodiode array were amplified, digitized (14-bit) at 2000 frames per second (Microstar Laboratories Inc, Bellevue, Wash) and were acquired for at least 40 seconds for subsequent data analysis.

Nerve Stimulation and Image Acquisition Protocols

Sympathetic Nerve Stimulation

A quadripolar electrode was inserted in the spinal canal at the 12th thoracic vertebra, and the tip was advanced to the level of the second thoracic vertebra to stimulate cardiac sympathetic outflow. From previous reports, SNS and VNS tolerated stimulation frequencies of up to 20 Hz and 15 V, without noticeable run down of the autonomic responses, measured as changes in heart rate and developed pressure.24 In this study, SNS were kept at a submaximal stimulation strength of 15 Hz and 15 V for 50 seconds or until the maximum change of heart rate occurred24; then the stimulus was turned off to allow heart rate to return to baseline. Vagus nerves were stimulated individually (right or left) or simultaneously with silver chloride bipolar electrodes (15 V, 15Hz for 5 seconds) producing a drop in the heart rate to <100 bpm. A stimulus generator was custom made in the electronic shop of University of Pittsburgh to control the stimuli from 1 to 20 V and 1 to 20 Hz.

Data Analysis

APDs were measured from the optical APs recorded at each site from the difference between the activation and repolarization time points, as previously described.15 The activation time point was calculated from the maximum first derivative of the AP upstroke (dF/dt)max, which represented the time when most of the cells viewed by a diode fired an AP and the repolarization time point was calculated from the maximum second derivative of the AP downstroke, (d2F/dt2)max.15 We previously showed that the inflection point, (d2F/dt2)max, represents the refractory period of the AP based on extra stimuli applied at 1.5× threshold voltage. The second derivative fell at 97% and 90% to 96% recovery to baseline for APs recorded, respectively, with a microelectrode or optically.15 In hearts with a prominent plateau phase, such as the rabbit (but not the mouse or rat AP), the maximum second derivative of the AP downstroke provided a unique time point that is not distorted by motion artifacts. In addition, the second derivative algorithm offered a major advantage in that it was impervious to low levels of motion artifacts compared with APD70 or APD90.15 All parameters, APDs, DOR, activation intervals, and heart rate were expressed as the mean±SEM. Comparisons were made using Student’s t test on paired samples.14,29,32 Comparisons were made between paired samples and t test was used to test the significance. A probability value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. The isochronal lines (2-ms interval) were drawn using custom written software using IDL (Interactive Data Language).

Results

Effects of Autonomic Nerve Stimulation and Perfusion With Neurotransmitters on Heart Rate

Figure 2 illustrates the time course of heart rate changes elicited by SNS (A), bilateral VNS (B), or perfusion with isoproterenol (C) or acetylcholine (D). All four interventions were applied until the maximum change in heart rate was reached then the intervention was stopped. As shown in Figure 2A and 2B, the interruption of autonomic nerve stimulation resulted in the recovery of the heart rate back to its original value in seconds. In contrast, the wash of neurotransmitters and the reversal of their effects on heart rate was considerably slower requiring several minutes. (Note time scale in Figure 2C and 2D.) Bipolar electrogram recordings were made continuously to verify that the hearts remained in sinus rhythm throughout the measurements. Electrogram recordings are illustrated for each intervention before (traces a), during (traces b), and after (traces c), the application of SNS (A), VNS (B), ISO (C) and ACH (D). In all the hearts analyzed, activation under sinus rhythm lasted 6±2 ms (n=30) and the patterns did not vary significantly (not shown).

Figure2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Figure 2. Changes in activation intervals (AI) and electrogram recordings as a function of time. Changes in activation intervals were plotted as a function of time during sinus rhythm before (a), during (b), and after (c) a physiological intervention. Below each plot, electrogram recordings are shown for three phases of these experiments before (a), during (b), and after (c) recovery from an intervention. The duration of each intervention is shown as a red line. Activation interval are in milliseconds. A, SNS. B, Bilateral VNS. C, Infusion of isoproterenol (ISO) (100 nmol/L). D, Infusion of acetylcholine (ACH) (1 μmol/L).

Sympathetic Nerve Stimulation

Stimulation of the spinal canal to induce SNS increased heart rate gradually from 143±6.3 (AI=427±18.3 ms) to a peak rate of 229±13.2 (AI=265±13.2 ms) bpm (Figure 2A). More remarkable, SNS changed the direction of repolarization from apex toward the base to base toward the apex (Table, n=7). Figure 3A illustrates a map of repolarization gradient and a series of 16 superimposed APs from apex to base at slow and fast sweep speeds, during sinus rhythm before SNS. Figure 3B shows the same measurement from the same heart after 50 seconds of SNS at 15 Hz. The reversal of the direction of repolarization during SNS was attributable to difference of its effects at the base and apex of the ventricles. As shown in the Table, SNS did not significantly change APDs at the apex (control: APD=159±4.2 ms; during SNS: APD=155±12 ms; P=NS), whereas SNS caused a marked shortening of APDs at the base (134±9.3 ms) compared with sinus rhythm (APD: 176±4.0 ms; P<0.001; n=7). DOR during sinus rhythm (APD base–APD apex) was 17±0.7 ms, and during SNS, DOR changed to −22±1.6 ms (P<0.001; n=7), meaning that the direction of repolarization was reversed because of heterogeneities of the effects of SNS being more pronounced at the base than at the apex.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Changes in Heart Rate, APDs, and DOR During SNS and VNS

Figure3
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Figure 3. Effects of sympathetic neuromodulation of ABDOR. Each map (left panels) represent the dispersion of repolarization for a single cardiac beat and is displayed as an isochronal map with lines 2-ms apart. Light to dark shades represent early to late repolarization time points. Arrow points to the direction of repolarization sequence. Traces designated as “a” illustrate the superposition of APs (aligned in time) from different locations on the heart and differences of APDs across the surface. Traces designated as “b” display the same traces at a faster sweep speed to visualize temporal differences in AP downstroke. CTRL indicates control; VNSR, right VNS; VNSL, left VNS; VNSBL, bilateral VNS.

Sinus Rhythm Versus Isoproterenol Infusion

Isoproterenol infusion (100 nmol/L) increased heart rate to 204±13.1 bpm (n=6) (P=0.0289) and DOR to 23±1.6 ms (P<0.01, n=5) (Figure 2C) but did not change the direction of repolarization, which remained from apex to base. Figure 4A and 4B compares maps of APDs recorded from the same heart first in sinus rhythm and 2 minutes after perfusion with 100 nmol/L isoproterenol.

Figure4
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Figure 4. Pharmacological modulation of (apex–base) DOR. DOR is mapped with isochronal lines (2 ms apart). Light to dark shades represent early to late repolarization time points. Arrow points to the direction of repolarization. Note that there is no change in the direction of the repolarization sequence caused by the adrenergic or muscarinic agonists. Isochronal lines are 2 ms apart. CTRL indicates control; ISO, isoproterenol; ACH, acetylcholine infusion.

Time Course of DOR Changes Caused by SNS

On SNS, DOR reversed from apex→base to base→apex by 15 seconds, and when SNS stimulation was stopped, heart rate returned to baseline and DOR returned to control values and to its original orientation (ie, apex to base), with a latency of 115±15 seconds. Figure 5 depicts the changes in DOR as a function of time for 4 hearts for which DOR was mapped before, during 50 seconds of SNS, and 150 seconds after the interruption of SNS. The slower recovery of DOR of ≈2 minutes implicates a cellular signaling process, but the possibility of a slow redistribution of neurotransmitter (ie, norepinephrine) or a slow dissociation constant from its receptor cannot be excluded.

Figure5
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Figure 5. Dynamic changes of DOR during SNS and recovery. Time course of changes in DOR before, during, and after sympathetic nerve stimulation (n=4 hearts). DOR was inverted within 15 seconds after SNS and remained invested in some experiments for as long as 15 minutes (not shown), whereas recovery had a longer latency of 115±15 seconds after the interruption of SNS. After the interruption of SNS at peak heart rate (≈50 seconds), different hearts reversed their DOR at different times. More precisely, the earliest reversal occurred at 115 seconds in 1 of 4 hearts; 3 hearts reversed at 165±5 seconds and 1 heart at 180 seconds.

Vagus Nerve Stimulation

Right VNS caused a gradual drop in heart rate to 95±4.5 bpm (n=6), and DOR did not change significantly in magnitude or direction (Table). Left VNS caused a significant a similar drop in heart rate as for right VNS (96±5.8 bpm), failed to produce a statistically significant change DOR, and did not reverse the orientation of repolarization (Table). In contrast, bilateral VNS reversed the direction of repolarization from apex→base to base→apex, with ΔAPD=−16±2 ms during bilateral VNS. Figure 3A and 3C through 3E compares maps of repolarization from the same during sinus rhythm (Figure 3A, control), right VNS (Figure 3C), left VNS (Figure 3D), and bilateral VNS (Figure 3E). Bilateral VNS reversed the repolarization sequence attributable to its different effects at the base and apex of the ventricles. APDs at the apex increased significantly during bilateral VNS compared with sinus rhythm, from 159±4.2 to 195±14 ms (n=6; p <=0.02), which may be attributed in large part to the decrease in heart rate from 143±6.3 to 91±6.6 bpm (Table). At the base, however, bilateral VNS did not cause a statistically significant APD prolongation from 176±4.0 ms in sinus rhythm to 178±13.8 ms with bilateral VNS (Table). When compared with the anticipated APD prolongation observed by pacing at long cycle lengths, bilateral VNS failed to produce the APD prolongation expected from the slower heart rate.

Sinus Rhythm Versus Acetylcholine Infusion

Perfusion with acetylcholine (1 μmol/L) to mimic parasympathetic nerve activity decreased heart rate to 105±10.2 bpm with significant increase in (DOR 32±3.0 ms) but without any change in the direction of repolarization sequence (Table). Figure 4C illustrates a repolarization map and the superposition of APs (apex→base) that were recorded during perfusion with acetylcholine (1 μmol/L). As shown in Figure 4C, repolarization advanced from apex to base, similar to repolarization sequence recorded in the absence of autonomic nerve activity.

Effects of Autonomic Nerve Stimulation on the Repolarization Sequence

Figure 6 summarizes the changes in DOR measured on the left ventricle of rabbit hearts during SNS, right, and left and bilateral VNS compared with isoproterenol or acetylcholine perfusion. The averaged data reveal a statistically significant reversal of the repolarization sequence, being oriented from apex→base in controls to base→apex during SNS or bilateral VNS. Changes in the magnitude of DOR can be attributed to rate and cellular signaling effects caused by norepinephrine and acetylcholine, but the reversals of the repolarization sequence implicate spatial heterogeneities of autonomic nerves along the apex–base axis.

Figure6
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Figure 6. Summary of autonomic modulation of DOR. A, Summary of DOR changes in sinus rhythm compared with various autonomic nerve stimulation protocols. n indicates the number of rabbit hearts tested; CTRL, control; VNSR, right VNS; VNSL, left VNS; VNSBL, bilateral VNS; Iso, isoproterenol (100 nmol/L); Ach, acetylcholine (1 μmol/L). **P<0.05 by paired t test vs control.

Discussion

The main findings are that autonomic (bilateral either sympathetic or parasympathetic) nerve stimulation changes DOR on the epicardium in a manner distinct from perfusion with a β-adrenergic or cholinergic agonist (see Figure 6). In particular, autonomic nerve stimulation was found to bring about a reversal of the direction of repolarization along the apex to base axis of the heart. The reversal of DOR had a rapid onset of <15 seconds after SNS, and on stopping SNS, DOR reversed back to sinus rhythm DOR, with a latency of ≈2 minutes. Perfusion with isoproterenol produced similar increases in heart rate as those obtained by SNS; yet there was no reversal of DOR. Similarly, bilateral VNS produced the expected decrease in heart rate and reversed the direction of repolarization, whereas perfusion with acetylcholine produced a similar decrease in heart rate but did not reverse DOR.

It is important to emphasize that the stimulation of the autonomic nerves described in this study followed previous protocols that were shown to be physiological with respect to (1) changes in heart rate and (2) left ventricular developed pressure.24 Changes in the latter parameters during SNS were entirely blocked by a selective β1 adrenergic antagonist metoprolol (1.8 μmol/L) and during VNS by a muscarinic antagonist, atropine (0.1 μmol/L), indicating that autonomic nerve stimulation modulated the heart by the standard neurotransmitters.24 In the current experiments, autonomic nerve stimulation produced changes in heart rate in the physiological range that were highly reproducible from heart to heart and were reversible on interruption of nerve stimulation. In addition, we were able to obtain multiple repetitions3–4 of SNS and VNS on the same heart, without significant run down of the autonomic nerves based on the cardiac responses.

Ventricular Repolarization

Ventricular activation sequences have been extensively characterized in intact hearts by mapping the time delays of QRS spikes measured from closely spaced extracellular bipolar electrodes.33 In contrast, the repolarization sequence or recovery to baseline has been poorly defined, in large part, because of technical difficulties and the sensitivity of that process to numerous variables. Changes in heart rate, temperature depth of anesthesia, sympathetic tone, and electrolyte balance all influence the APD locally and, thus, ventricular repolarization. APs can be recorded from the epicardial surface with microelectrodes or suction electrodes but only from a limited number of sites, leaving surface electrograms as the most practical method to track activation and repolarization sequences.33 However, unlike activation, there is no electrogram deflection that accurately identifies the onset or termination of repolarization. Nevertheless, local activation recovery intervals (ARIs) measured with surface electrodes (ie, activation time point (minimum dV/dt of the QRS complex) minus the recovery (maximum dV/dt of the T-wave) time point) were used as a surrogate for APDs measured with an intracellular electrode. In early studies on dog hearts, ventricular repolarization determined from ARIs produced opposite findings; with repolarization sequence proceeding from base to apex34 or apex to base.35 Although there was a good correlation between ARIs and refractory periods and APDs, most ARIs were shorter than refractory periods36 and differed from APDs by as much as 24 ms.37 Alternatively, repolarization sequences determined from the local refractory periods indicated that repolarization and APD gradients proceeds from base to apex (short-to-long APDs) in situ in dog hearts.38,39 A more recent study on canine and human hearts reported the opposite result that APDs are shorter in ventricular myocytes from the apex than the base caused by higher densities of K+ currents involved in ventricular repolarization.11

The advent of voltage sensitive dyes and optical mapping techniques has provided new tools to characterize ventricular repolarization.40 In isolated perfused hearts, ventricular repolarization was found to proceed from apex to base in a wide range of species: (1) mouse,12,41 (2) rat,42 (3) guinea pig,14 (4) rabbit,32 and perhaps (5) dog and human hearts. In all of these species, repolarization is driven by a different set of ion channels; yet their spatial distribution preserves short to long APDs in going from apex to base, so as to guide the sequence of repolarization and relaxation.

Anatomical Distribution of Autonomic Nerves to the Heart

Sympathetic outflow to the heart emerges from the thoracic intermediolateral horns of the spinal cord. Preganglionic neurons in the spinal cord project to the heart via axons to postganglionic neurons to innervate the heart via paravertebral ganglia and the various thoracic and cardiac ganglia.43,44 Studies on dogs reported that different branches of the sympathetic nerves innervated distinct regions of the ventricles but there is a controversy regarding such specific anatomical nerve distribution. In our experiment, spinal canal stimulation at the level of T2 vertebrae allowed us to broadly activate bilaterally the sympathetic nerves thus, circumventing potential controversies, inaccuracies, and animal-to-animal variability of cardiac nerve distribution.45,46

Effects and Mechanism of Sympathetic Activity on DOR

Changes in APD during SNS were heterogeneous and striking. During the SNS, DOR not only increased across the ventricle but its direction was inverted. Under control conditions, APDs were longer at the base than the apex, whereas during SNS, APDs at the base were significantly shorter than at the apex. Changes of DOR on SNS occurred rapidly in 5 to 15 seconds, and DOR reversed back to control orientation but with a slower time course of 130 to 140 seconds. These findings are consistent with current concepts in the literature. The autonomic nerves and of delayed rectifying K+ channels involved in the repolarization of the heart are heterogeneously distributed along the apex to base axis of the heart. In human hearts, autonomic nerves (both sympathetic and parasympathetic) are considerably more abundant at the base than the apex of left ventricles.47 The delayed rectifying K+ currents are nonuniform on the surface of the heart, with the slow component, IKs, being more abundant at the base and the fast component, IKr, being more abundant at the apex of the rabbit left ventricle.32,48 Moreover, IKs tends to be a weak current, difficult to measure until activated by a β-adrenergic agonist such as isoproterenol, which decreases the refractory period by a protein kinase A–dependent phosphorylation of IKs but has no effect on IKr.49,50 Therefore in the absence of sympathetic activity, IKr dominates and repolarization advances from apex to base. In contrast, during SNS, activation of IKs by norepinephrine is more abundant at the base, resulting in greater APD shortening at the base than at the apex and a reversal of the repolarization sequence. The preferential shortening of APDs at the base under sympathetic influence occurred in ≈15 seconds (ie, time to phosphorylate IKs) and was reversible on interruption of SNS with a latency of 180 seconds consistent with the time course of IKs dephosphorylation.49

Interestingly, perfusion of the heart with isoproterenol had a tendency to enhance DOR (Table) by shortening APDs slightly more at the apex than the base, but the direction of repolarization was not reversed. These data highlight the complexity of the system because SNS releases norepinephrine, a β- and α-adrenergic agonist that stimulates nearly all ionic currents and their kinetics. In addition, SNS may activate afferent as well efferent nerves and release other neurotransmitters such as neuropeptide Y, ATP, and substance P. Nevertheless, the results from the isoproterenol perfusion allows us to reasonably conclude that regional (apex–base) heterogeneities of sympathetic innervation (efferent and/or afferent nerves) is the dominant factor responsible for the reversal of DOR during SNS rather than IKr, IKs, or β1 adrenergic receptor distribution across the ventricle.28

Effects and Mechanism of Parasympathetic Activity on DOR

Right or left VNS did not change the DOR significantly, but bilateral VNS reversed the direction of DOR, this time by prolonging APD more at the apex than the base. All 3 methods of VNS decreased heart rate to the same extent, so that differences in APD caused by the 3 conditions cannot be attributed to heart rate alone (Table and Figure 5) but to enhanced recruitment of parasympathetic and acetylcholine release during bilateral VNS. Acetylcholine released by vagus nerves may shorten ventricular APDs by increasing the K+ conductance via the muscarinic receptors in the ventricle.51 Immunohistochemistry47 of parasympathetic nerve distribution to the ventricle suggests a greater density of nerves at the base than the apex, which may explain the lack of APD prolongation at the base, despite the slow heart rate during bilateral VNS. Thus, as for SNS, the effects of VNS on DOR are most likely caused by heterogeneities in nerve distribution resulting in the modulation of the repolarization sequence.

Neuronal modulation of ventricular repolarization is unique and distinct from pharmacological modulation. These findings reveal that under physiological conditions autonomic activity has a marked impact on cardiac repolarization and broaden our views on why and how “autonomic imbalance” may be an important factor contributing to arrhythmia vulnerability during physical or emotional stress. Further studies are needed to elucidate the effects of autonomic nerve activity on transmural repolarization, on hearts with long QT or ischemia to gain deeper insights into the contribution of neural activity to arrhythmia vulnerability.

Acknowledgments

Sources of Funding

This study was supported by NIH grants RO1 HL57929 and HL70722 (to G.S.).

Disclosures

None.

Footnotes

  • Original received January 16, 2007; revision received March 1, 2007; accepted March 7, 2007.

References

  1. ↵
    Curran ME, Splawski I, Timothy KW, Vincent GM, Green ED, Keating MT. A molecular basis for cardiac arrhythmia: HERG mutations cause long QT syndrome. Cell. 1995; 80: 795–803.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Wang Q, Shen J, Splawski I, Atkinson D, Li Z, Robinson JL, Moss AJ, Towbin JA, Keating MT. SCN5A mutations associated with an inherited cardiac arrhythmia, long QT syndrome. Cell. 1995; 80: 805–811.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Wang Q, Curran ME, Splawski I, Burn TC, Millholland JM, VanRaay TJ, Shen J, Timothy KW, Vincent GM, de Jager T, Schwartz PJ, Toubin JA, Moss AJ, Atkinson DL, Landes GM, Connors TD, Keating MT. Positional cloning of a novel potassium channel gene: KVLQT1 mutations cause cardiac arrhythmias. Nat Genet. 1996; 12: 17–23.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Splawski I, Timothy KW, Decher N, Kumar P, Sachse FB, Beggs AH, Sanguinetti MC, Keating MT. Severe arrhythmia disorder caused by cardiac L-type calcium channel mutations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 102: 8089–8096, 2005; discussion 8086–8088.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Antzelevitch C. Role of transmural dispersion of repolarization in the genesis of drug-induced torsades de pointes. Heart Rhythm. 2005; 2: S9–S15.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    Antzelevitch C, Belardinelli L. The role of sodium channel current in modulating transmural dispersion of repolarization and arrhythmogenesis. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2006; 17 (suppl 1): S79–S85.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    Antzelevitch C. Transmural dispersion of repolarization and the T wave. Cardiovasc Res. 2001; 50: 426–431.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Brahmajothi MV, Morales MJ, Rasmusson RL, Campbell DL, Strauss HC. Heterogeneity in K+ channel transcript expression detected in isolated ferret cardiac myocytes. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1997; 20: 388–396.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    Nerbonne JM, Guo W. Heterogeneous expression of voltage-gated potassium channels in the heart: roles in normal excitation and arrhythmias. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2002; 13: 406–409.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    Szabo G, Szentandrassy N, Biro T, Toth BI, Czifra G, Magyar J, Banyasz T, Varro A, Kovacs L, Nanasi PP. Asymmetrical distribution of ion channels in canine and human left-ventricular wall: epicardium versus midmyocardium. Pflugers Arch. 2005; 450: 307–316.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    Szentadrassy N, Banyasz T, Biro T, Szabo G, Toth BI, Magyar J, Lazar J, Varro A, Kovacs L, Nanasi PP. Apico-basal inhomogeneity in distribution of ion channels in canine and human ventricular myocardium. Cardiovasc Res. 2005; 65: 851–860.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    Baker LC, London B, Choi BR, Koren G, Salama G. Enhanced dispersion of repolarization and refractoriness in transgenic mouse hearts promotes reentrant ventricular tachycardia. Circ Res. 2000; 86: 396–407.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    London B, Baker LC, Petkova-Kirova P, Nerbonne JM, Choi BR, Salama G. Dispersion of repolarization and refractoriness are determinants of arrhythmia phenotype in transgenic mice with long QT. J Physiol. 2007; 578 (pt 1): 115–129.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    Salama G, Lombardi R, Elson J. Maps of optical action potentials and NADH fluorescence in intact working hearts. Am J Physiol. 1987; 252: H384–H394.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. ↵
    Efimov IR, Huang DT, Rendt JM, Salama G. Optical mapping of repolarization and refractoriness from intact hearts. Circulation. 1994; 90: 1469–1480.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    Efimov IR, Ermentrout B, Huang DT, Salama G. Activation and repolarization patterns are governed by different structural characteristics of ventricular myocardium: experimental study with voltage-sensitive dyes and numerical simulations. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1996; 7: 512–530.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. ↵
    Rosenbaum DS, Kaplan DT, Kanai A, Jackson L, Garan H, Cohen RJ, Salama G. Repolarization inhomogeneities in ventricular myocardium change dynamically with abrupt cycle length shortening. Circulation. 1991; 84: 1333–1345.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    Choi BR, Salama G. Simultaneous maps of optical action potentials and calcium transients in guinea-pig hearts: mechanisms underlying concordant alternans. J Physiol. 2000; 529 (pt 1): 171–188.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    Liu T, Choi BR, Drici MD, Salama G. Sex modulates the arrhythmogenic substrate in prepubertal rabbit hearts with Long QT 2. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005; 16: 516–524.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    Kanai ASG. Optical mapping reveals that repolarization spreads anisotropically and is guided by fiber orientation in guinea pig hearts. Circ Res. 1995; 77: 784–802.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    Fish JM, Di Diego JM, Nesterenko V, Antzelevitch C. Epicardial activation of left ventricular wall prolongs QT interval and transmural dispersion of repolarization: implications for biventricular pacing. Circulation. 2004; 109: 2136–2142.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    Magnano AR, Holleran S, Ramakrishnan R, Reiffel JA, Bloomfield DM. Autonomic modulation of the u wave during sympathomimetic stimulation and vagal inhibition in normal individuals. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2004; 27: 1484–1492.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    Magnano AR, Talathoti N, Hallur R, Bloomfield DM, Garan H. Sympathomimetic infusion and cardiac repolarization: the normative effects of epinephrine and isoproterenol in healthy subjects. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2006; 17: 983–989.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    Ng GA, Brack KE, Coote JH. Effects of direct sympathetic and vagus nerve stimulation on the physiology of the whole heart—a novel model of isolated Langendorff perfused rabbit heart with intact dual autonomic innervation. Exp Physiol. 2001; 86: 319–329.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    Riccio ML, Koller ML, Gilmour RF Jr. Electrical restitution and spatiotemporal organization during ventricular fibrillation. Circ Res. 1999; 84: 955–963.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    Pak HN, Hong SJ, Hwang GS, Lee HS, Park SW, Ahn JC, Moo Ro Y, Kim YH. Spatial dispersion of action potential duration restitution kinetics is associated with induction of ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation in humans. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2004; 15: 1357–1363.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    Nearing BD, Verrier RL. Modified moving average analysis of T-wave alternans to predict ventricular fibrillation with high accuracy. J Appl Physiol. 2002; 92: 541–549.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    Conrath CE, Opthof T. Ventricular repolarization: an overview of (patho) physiology, sympathetic effects and genetic aspects. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2006; 92: 269–307.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    Choi BR, Liu T, Salama G. The distribution of refractory periods influences the dynamics of ventricular fibrillation. Circ Res. 2001; 88: e49–e58.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. ↵
    Verrier RL, Antzelevitch C. Autonomic aspects of arrhythmogenesis: the enduring and the new. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2004; 19: 2–11.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    Verrier RL, Dickerson LW, Nearing BD. Behavioral states and sudden cardiac death. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1992; 15: 1387–1393.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  32. ↵
    Choi BR, Burton F, Salama G. Cytosolic Ca2+ triggers early afterdepolarizations and Torsade de Pointes in rabbit hearts with type 2 long QT syndrome. J Physiol. 2002; 543: 615–631.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    Burgess MJ, Baruffi S, Spaggiari S, Macchi E, Lux R, Taccardi B. Determination of activation and recovery sequences and local repolarization durations from distant electrocardiographic leads. Jpn Heart J. 1986; 27 (suppl 1): 205–216.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  34. ↵
    Massumi RA, Pipberger H, Prinzmetal M, Schwartz L. Studies on the nature of the repolarization process. XIX. Studies on the mechanism of ventricular activity. Am Heart J. 1957; 53: 100–124.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    Haas HG. [Contribution to the theory of the ventricular gradient.]. Cardiologia. 1960; 36: 321–336.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  36. ↵
    Millar CK, Kralios FA, Lux RL. Correlation between refractory periods and activation-recovery intervals from electrograms: effects of rate and adrenergic interventions. Circulation. 1985; 72: 1372–1379.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    Haws CW, Lux RL. Correlation between in vivo transmembrane action potential durations and activation-recovery intervals from electrograms. Effects of interventions that alter repolarization time. Circulation. 1990; 81: 281–288.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    Burgess MJ, Green LS, Millar K, Wyatt R, Abildskov JA. The sequence of normal ventricular recovery. Am Heart J. 1972; 84: 660–669.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    Autenrieth G, Surawicz B, Kuo CS. Sequence of repolarization on the ventricular surface in the dog. Am Heart J. 1975; 89: 463–469.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    Salama G, Choi BR. Images of action potential propagation in heart. News Physiol Sci. 2000; 15: 33–41.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. ↵
    London B, Baker LC, Petkova-Kirova P, Nerbonne JM, Choi BR, Salama G. Dispersion of repolarization and refractoriness are determinants of arrhythmia phenotype in transgenic mice with long QT. J Physiol. 2007; 578: 115–129.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    Wan B, Doumen C, Duszynski J, Salama G, Vary TC, LaNoue KF. Effects of cardiac work on electrical potential gradient across mitochondrial membrane in perfused rat hearts. Am J Physiol. 1993; 265: H453–460.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  43. ↵
    VI S. Physiology of Autonomic Ganglia. Tokyo: Igaku Shoin; 1973.
  44. ↵
    Armour JA. Cardiac neuronal hierarchy in health and disease. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2004; 287: R262–R271.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. ↵
    Opthof T, Misier AR, Coronel R, Vermeulen JT, Verberne HJ, Frank RG, Moulijn AC, van Capelle FJ, Janse MJ. Dispersion of refractoriness in canine ventricular myocardium. Effects of sympathetic stimulation. Circ Res. 1991; 68: 1204–1215.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. ↵
    Gillespie JS, Muir TC. A method of stimulating the complete sympathetic outflow from the spinal cord to blood vessels in the pithed rat. Br J Pharmacol Chemother. 1967; 30: 78–87.
    OpenUrl
  47. ↵
    Kawano H, Okada R, Yano K. Histological study on the distribution of autonomic nerves in the human heart. Heart Vessels. 2003; 18: 32–39.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    Cheng J, Kamiya K, Liu W, Tsuji Y, Toyama J, Kodama I. Heterogeneous distribution of the two components of delayed rectifier K+ current: a potential mechanism of the proarrhythmic effects of methanesulfonanilideclass III agents. Cardiovasc Res. 1999; 43: 135–147.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. ↵
    Sanguinetti MC, Jurkiewicz NK, Scott A, Siegl PK. Isoproterenol antagonizes prolongation of refractory period by the class III antiarrhythmic agent E-4031 in guinea pig myocytes. Mechanism of action. Circ Res. 1991; 68: 77–84.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. ↵
    Volders PG, Stengl M, van Opstal JM, Gerlach U, Spatjens RL, Beekman JD, Sipido KR, Vos MA. Probing the contribution of IKs to canine ventricular repolarization: key role for beta-adrenergic receptor stimulation. Circulation. 2003; 107: 2753–2760.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. ↵
    Koumi S, Sato R, Nagasawa K, Hayakawa H. Activation of inwardly rectifying potassium channels by muscarinic receptor-linked G protein in isolated human ventricular myocytes. J Membr Biol. 1997; 157: 71–81.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

Circulation Research
April 13, 2007, Volume 100, Issue 7
  • Table of Contents
Previous ArticleNext Article

Jump to

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics

Article Tools

  • Print
  • Citation Tools
    Autonomic Nerve Stimulation Reverses Ventricular Repolarization Sequence in Rabbit Hearts
    Rajkumar Mantravadi, Bethann Gabris, Tong Liu, Bum-Rak Choi, William C. de Groat, G. André Ng and Guy Salama
    Circulation Research. 2007;100:e72-e80, originally published April 12, 2007
    https://doi.org/10.1161/01.RES.0000264101.06417.33

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
  •  Download Powerpoint
  • Article Alerts
    Log in to Email Alerts with your email address.
  • Save to my folders

Share this Article

  • Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Circulation Research.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Autonomic Nerve Stimulation Reverses Ventricular Repolarization Sequence in Rabbit Hearts
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from Circulation Research
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the Circulation Research web site.
  • Share on Social Media
    Autonomic Nerve Stimulation Reverses Ventricular Repolarization Sequence in Rabbit Hearts
    Rajkumar Mantravadi, Bethann Gabris, Tong Liu, Bum-Rak Choi, William C. de Groat, G. André Ng and Guy Salama
    Circulation Research. 2007;100:e72-e80, originally published April 12, 2007
    https://doi.org/10.1161/01.RES.0000264101.06417.33
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

Related Articles

Cited By...

Subjects

  • Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • Arrhythmias
  • Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research
    • Animal Models of Human Disease

Circulation Research

  • About Circulation Research
  • Editorial Board
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Abstract Supplements
  • AHA Statements and Guidelines
  • Permissions
  • Reprints
  • Email Alerts
  • Open Access Information
  • AHA Journals RSS
  • AHA Newsroom

Editorial Office Address:
3355 Keswick Rd
Main Bldg 103
Baltimore, MD 21211
CircRes@circresearch.org

Information for:
  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Subscriber Help
  • Institutions / Librarians
  • Institutional Subscriptions FAQ
  • International Users
American Heart Association Learn and Live
National Center
7272 Greenville Ave.
Dallas, TX 75231

Customer Service

  • 1-800-AHA-USA-1
  • 1-800-242-8721
  • Local Info
  • Contact Us

About Us

Our mission is to build healthier lives, free of cardiovascular diseases and stroke. That single purpose drives all we do. The need for our work is beyond question. Find Out More about the American Heart Association

  • Careers
  • SHOP
  • Latest Heart and Stroke News
  • AHA/ASA Media Newsroom

Our Sites

  • American Heart Association
  • American Stroke Association
  • For Professionals
  • More Sites

Take Action

  • Advocate
  • Donate
  • Planned Giving
  • Volunteer

Online Communities

  • AFib Support
  • Garden Community
  • Patient Support Network
  • Professional Online Network

Follow Us:

  • Follow Circulation on Twitter
  • Visit Circulation on Facebook
  • Follow Circulation on Google Plus
  • Follow Circulation on Instagram
  • Follow Circulation on Pinterest
  • Follow Circulation on YouTube
  • Rss Feeds
  • Privacy Policy
  • Copyright
  • Ethics Policy
  • Conflict of Interest Policy
  • Linking Policy
  • Diversity
  • Careers

©2018 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. The American Heart Association is a qualified 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization.
*Red Dress™ DHHS, Go Red™ AHA; National Wear Red Day ® is a registered trademark.

  • PUTTING PATIENTS FIRST National Health Council Standards of Excellence Certification Program
  • BBB Accredited Charity
  • Comodo Secured