Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation Research
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation Research. 2001
Published online before print September 13, 2001, doi: 10.1161/hh2101.098442
A more recent version of this article appeared on October 26, 2001
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
89/9/799    most recent
hh2101.098442v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kucera, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Rudy, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kucera, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Rudy, Y.
Related Collections
Right arrow Structure
Right arrow Arrythmias-basic studies
Right arrow Ion channels/membrane transport
Right arrow Quantitative modeling

Submitted on June 25, 2001
Revised on August 17, 2001
Accepted on August 29, 2001

Mechanistic Insights Into Very Slow Conduction in Branching Cardiac Tissue. A Model Study

Jan P. Kucera * and Yoram Rudy

From the Cardiac Bioelectricity Research and Training Center, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jpk12{at}po.cwru.edu or kucera@pyl.unibe.ch.

It is known that branching strands of cardiac tissue can form a substrate for very slow conduction. The branches slow conduction by acting as current loads drawing depolarizing current from the main strand ("pull" effect). It has been suggested that, on depolarization of the branches, they become current sources reinjecting current back into the strand, thus enhancing propagation safety ("push" effect). It was the aim of this study to verify this hypothesis and to assess the contribution of the push effect to propagation velocity and safety. Conduction was investigated in strands of Luo-Rudy dynamic model cells that branch from either a single branch point or from multiple successive branch points. In single-branching strands, blocking the push effect by not allowing current to flow retrogradely from the branches into the strand did not significantly increase the branching-induced local propagation delay. However, in multiple branching strands, blocking the push effect resulted in a significant slowing of overall conduction velocity or even in conduction failure. Furthermore, for certain slow velocities, the safety factor for propagation was higher when slow conduction was caused by branching tissue geometry than by reduced excitability without branching. Therefore, these results confirm the proposed "pull and push" mechanism of slow, but nevertheless robust, conduction in branching structures. Slow conduction based on this mechanism could occur in the atrioventricular node, where multiple branching is structurally present. It could also support reentrant excitation in diseased myocardium where the substrate is structurally complex.


Key words: slow conduction • discontinuous conduction • source-to-load mismatch • atrioventricular node • mathematical model




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
QJMHome page
J. Sanchez-Quinones, F. Marin, V. Roldan, and G.Y.H. Lip
The impact of statin use on atrial fibrillation
QJM, November 1, 2008; 101(11): 845 - 861.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
S. Petitprez, T. Jespersen, E. Pruvot, D. I. Keller, C. Corbaz, J. Schlapfer, H. Abriel, and J. P. Kucera
Analyses of a novel SCN5A mutation (C1850S): conduction vs. repolarization disorder hypotheses in the Brugada syndrome
Cardiovasc Res, June 1, 2008; 78(3): 494 - 504.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. M. Kreuzberg, J. W. Schrickel, A. Ghanem, J.-S. Kim, J. Degen, U. Janssen-Bienhold, T. Lewalter, K. Tiemann, and K. Willecke
Connexin30.2 containing gap junction channels decelerate impulse propagation through the atrioventricular node
PNAS, April 11, 2006; 103(15): 5959 - 5964.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
F. J. Perez, M. A. Wood, and C. M. Schubert
Effects of Gap Geometry on Conduction Through Discontinuous Radiofrequency Lesions
Circulation, April 11, 2006; 113(14): 1723 - 1729.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
C. J. Boos, R. A. Anderson, and G. Y.H. Lip
Is atrial fibrillation an inflammatory disorder?
Eur. Heart J., January 2, 2006; 27(2): 136 - 149.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
J. J. Wiley, R. E. Ideker, W. M. Smith, and A. E. Pollard
Measuring surface potential components necessary for transmembrane current computation using microfabricated arrays
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2005; 289(6): H2468 - H2477.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
A. G. KLEBER and Y. RUDY
Basic Mechanisms of Cardiac Impulse Propagation and Associated Arrhythmias
Physiol Rev, April 1, 2004; 84(2): 431 - 488.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
A Boldt, U Wetzel, J Lauschke, J Weigl, J Gummert, G Hindricks, H Kottkamp, and S Dhein
Fibrosis in left atrial tissue of patients with atrial fibrillation with and without underlying mitral valve disease
Heart, April 1, 2004; 90(4): 400 - 405.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
S. M. Taffet and J. Jalife
Swapping Connexin Genes: How Big Is the Gap?
Circ. Res., January 9, 2004; 94(1): 4 - 6.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
S. Kostin, G. Klein, Z. Szalay, S. Hein, E. P Bauer, and J. Schaper
Structural correlate of atrial fibrillation in human patients
Cardiovasc Res, May 1, 2002; 54(2): 361 - 379.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]