Published online before print April 24, 2008, doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.175505
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitted on March 12, 2008
Revised on April 1, 2008
Accepted on April 10, 2008
Human Embryonic Stem Cell–Derived Cardiomyocytes and Cardiac Repair in Rodents
Linda W. van Laake ;
From the Hubrecht Institute (L.W.v.L., R.P., C.L.M.), Utrecht; Heart Lung Center Utrecht (L.W.v.L., P.A.D.); and Department of Anatomy and Embryology (R.P., C.L.M.), Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands.
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: c.mummery{at}niob.knaw.nl.
Cell transplantation may restore heart function in disease associated with loss or dysfunction of cardiomyocytes. Recently, Laflamme et al reported an improvement in cardiac function in immunodeficient rats 4 weeks after coronary artery ligation and injection of human embryonic stem cell–derived cardiomyocytes (hESC-CMs). We have recently carried out a comparable study transplanting hESC-CMs to the hearts of mice with myocardial infarction. Our findings were similar up to the 4-week time point, with significant improvements in cardiac function. However, our follow-up was longer, and, at 3 months, the difference between mice receiving cardiomyocytes and those receiving other cells was no longer significant. Hypothesizing that the improvement observed by Laflamme et al may have been more likely to be sustained long term because the grafts in their study appeared larger, we injected 3 times as many cells. Although this resulted in a significantly increased graft size, we again observed a functional improvement at 1 month but not at 3 months. Our results show that midterm data in these kinds of experiments must be interpreted with caution and longer-term follow-up is essential to draw conclusions on the efficacy of cardiac cell transplantation. Furthermore, our findings demonstrate the unlikely success of merely generating and injecting more cells of the same type to increase functional improvement.
Key words: cell transplantation • MRI • myocardial infarction • stem cells
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  K. D. Boudoulas and A. K. Hatzopoulos Cardiac repair and regeneration: the Rubik's cube of cell therapy for heart disease Dis. Model. Mech., July 1, 2009; 2(7-8): 344 - 358. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. Tanaka and B. Galliot Triggering the regeneration and tissue repair programs Development, February 1, 2009; 136(3): 349 - 353. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. R. Chien, I. J. Domian, and K. K. Parker Cardiogenesis and the Complex Biology of Regenerative Cardiovascular Medicine Science, December 5, 2008; 322(5907): 1494 - 1497. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. C. Wu Molecular Imaging: Antidote to Cardiac Stem Cell Controversy J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 11, 2008; 52(20): 1661 - 1664. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. L. Tulloch, L. Pabon, and C. E. Murry Get With the (Re)Program: Cardiovascular Potential of Skin-Derived Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Circulation, July 29, 2008; 118(5): 472 - 475. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|