Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation Research
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation Research. 2006;99:13-14
doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000233147.38981.90
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Straub, S. V.
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, M. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Straub, S. V.
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, M. T.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article
(Circulation Research. 2006;99:13.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.


Editorials

Molecular Coding of Kv1 Channels to Oppose Myogenic Constriction

Stephen V. Straub, Mark T. Nelson

From the University of Vermont, Department of Pharmacology, Burlington, Vt.

Correspondence to Mark T. Nelson, Department of Pharmacology, University of Vermont, Given Building, Room B-333, 89 Beaumont Avenue, Burlington VT 05405-0068. E-mail Mark.Nelson{at}uvm.edu



See related article, pages 53–60


Key Words: voltage-gated potassium channel • myogenic response • vascular smooth muscle • cerebral circulation • Kv1 channel

Resistance arteries possess an intrinsic ability to constrict in response to increased intraluminal pressure, the "myogenic response."1 The ability of resistance vessels to modulate their diameter in response to changes in intraluminal pressure is thought to be an important component of blood flow autoregulation, such that constant blood flow and tissue perfusion are maintained in the face of variations in blood pressure.2,3 Specifically, intraluminal pressure results in a graded smooth muscle cell (SMC) depolarization from about –65 mV to about –40 mV,4 likely because of activation of nonselective cation channels.5 This depolarization activates L-type voltage-dependent calcium (Ca2+) channels, leading to elevation of the SMC cytosolic Ca2+ concentration, SMC contraction, and vasoconstriction.6 In the absence of negative feedback mechanisms to oppose myogenic constriction, resistance arteries would likely exhibit unstable membrane potentials and fluctuations in vascular diameter as a result of Ca2+ dependent action potentials.7 However, in vivo, graded and sustained changes in vascular diameter occur, such that blood flow is maintained despite changes in pressure.1 Activation of hyperpolarizing potassium (K+) conductances, which oppose depolarization and vasoconstriction, are critical negative feedback mechanisms responsible for controlling the extent of myogenic constriction.2,3,8–10

Smooth muscle cells express two types of K+ channels which are primarily responsible for opposing myogenic depolarization: (1) the large conductance Ca2+ sensitive K+ (BK) channel, which is activated by both membrane depolarization and intracellular Ca2+,8,11 and (2) voltage-gated K+ channels (KV channels), which are steeply activated by membrane potential (Vm) depolarization.9,10,12,13 Interestingly, BK channels appear to be under the control of spatially-localized micromolar increases in Ca2+ mediated by transient Ca2+ release events from ryanodine receptors (Ca2+ sparks).3,11,14 Through BK channels, Ca2+ sparks regulate Vm, vascular tone, and blood pressure.11,15 KV channels act in concert with BK channels to regulate SMC Vm and vascular diameter and thus also play a significant role in regulating vascular tone. Inhibition of KV channels, for example with the classical inhibitors tetraethylammonium ions (TEA, ≥1 mmol/L) or 4-aminopyridine (4-AP), leads to a dramatic SMC depolarization (&20 mV) and vasoconstriction (&30%).4,9,10,13 Furthermore, KV channel inhibition leads to increased myogenic tone at a given pressure,4,9,10 suggesting that under physiological conditions, KV channels serve to oppose myogenic constriction. The challenge, addressed by Chen et al16 in this issue of Circulation Research, is to identify the molecular nature of the KV channel that has the unique properties to modulate the myogenic response.

The KV channel family comprises 12 subfamilies of related genes (KV1 to 12) that form the {alpha} pore-forming subunits.17,18 Although the expression of different KVß subunits can serve to modulate channel activity,18,19 KV{alpha} subunits with distinct biophysical characteristics can assemble as heterotetramers, enabling the formation of a diverse array of functional channels that operate within the physiologically relevant conditions of a particular cellular system.9,10,20 Furthermore, the expression profile of KV channels may be tuned to satisfy the needs of a given system. For example, Plane et al9 have shown that the relative expression of message for KV1 subunits is significantly greater in 1st and 2nd order rat mesenteric arteries compared with 4th order arteries.

Biophysical measurements and pharmacological inhibitors with varying specificities have traditionally been used to probe KV channel function in vascular SMCs.3,7,20,21 TEA and 4-AP are relatively nonselective inhibitors of KV channels, with TEA also inhibiting BK channels.3 Correolide is often used to probe the contribution of KV1 channels to the generation of functional KV current, although it can also bind to KV2 subunits, albeit with much lower affinity than KV1 subunits.21 Given that heterotetrameric channels are expressed in vascular SMCs, and KV channels exhibit significant similarities in their activation and inactivation characteristics, conductance, and pharmacological sensitivities, it is difficult to conclusively gauge the relative contributions of each subtype to the functional KV current using traditional methods.

To overcome these issues, Chen et al16 used a dominant-negative cDNA construct to suppress KV1 currents in rat middle cerebral artery, and provide elegant molecular evidence for the involvement of KV1 containing channels in the regulation of vascular function. Specifically, a mutant KV1.5 construct (KV1.5DN) containing a single tryptophan to phenylalanine substitution in the pore-forming region was transfected into reverse permeabilized cerebral arteries, under the assumption that the mutant subunits would coassemble with endogenous KV1 subunits to form nonfunctional KV1 channels independent of subunit composition or stoichiometry. This dominant negative construct has previously been shown to prevent K+ permeation through the channel without altering channel expression.22 Importantly, Chen et al16 verified that this construct specifically suppressed KV1 but not KV2 currents in a heterologous expression system, and that it did not affect the levels of other known components of the myogenic response. Myogenic constriction was enhanced in cerebral arteries overexpressing KV1.5DN and decreased in arteries overexpressing wild-type KV1.5 without affecting passive response characteristics in the absence of extracellular Ca2+ over a range of intraluminal pressures. This effect of the dominant-negative channel on myogenic tone appears attributable to an exaggerated depolarization of the SMC Vm evoked by intraluminal pressure, as would be expected in the presence of crippled KV channel function. Specifically, SMCs in KV1.5DN transfected arteries were more depolarized than SMCs in mock transfected arteries pressurized to 80 mm Hg, whereas SMCs in arteries transfected with wild-type KV1.5 were more hyperpolarized at identical pressure. In addition, correolide treatment had divergent effects on myogenic constriction of arteries transfected with KV1.5DN versus arteries overexpressing wild-type KV1.5, consistent with the assertion that KV1.5DN serves to suppress the function of KV1 containing channels that are involved in the myogenic response. These findings provide important insights into the composition of the molecular machinery responsible for modulating the level of myogenic depolarization in the vasculature and demonstrate the utility of a molecular-based approach to manipulate cellular components that underlie normal vascular function.

The molecular coding of KV channels is central to the proper function of different types of smooth muscle. For example, urinary bladder smooth muscle exhibits rapid action potentials and prolonged afterhyperpolarizations, and KV2 family members, based on their kinetic properties, are key to this function.23 However, in vascular smooth muscle, which do not typically fire action potentials and depend on graded changes in Vm, KV1 channels have a dominant role in opposing excitability.9,10,13,16 Thus, disabling KV1 channel function would render vascular smooth muscle virtually defenseless to the depolarizing and vasoconstricting forces of intraluminal pressure and vasoconstricting agonists. Based on the current study and previous investigations of the role of KV channels in the vasculature, it is clear that KV1 channels underlie the regulation of vascular smooth muscle Vm over a wide range of physiologically relevant potentials (–65 to –40 mV) and constitute a critical negative feedback mechanism for regulating the extent of myogenic constriction. This body of work provides strong impetus to explore the involvement of endogenous modulators of KV1 channel activity in the regulation of vascular function as well as the potential role of KV1 channel dysfunction in pathological conditions such as hypertension and vasospasm.24


*    Acknowledgments
 
Sources of Funding

This work was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL44455) and the Totman Trust for Medical Research.

Disclosures

None.


*    Footnotes
 
The opinions expressed in this editorial are not necessarily those of the editors or of the American Heart Association.


*    References
up arrowTop
*References
 

  1. Bayliss W. On the local reactions of the arterial wall to changes of internal pressure. J Physiol. 1902; 28: 220–231.[Free Full Text]
  2. Davis MJ, Hill MA. Signaling mechanisms underlying the vascular myogenic response. Physiol Rev. 1999; 79: 387–423.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Nelson MT, Quayle JM. Physiological roles and properties of potassium channels in arterial smooth muscle. Am J Physiol. 1995; 268: C799–C822.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Knot HJ, Nelson MT. Regulation of membrane potential and diameter by voltage-dependent K+ channels in rabbit myogenic cerebral arteries. Am J Physiol. 1995; 269: H348–H355.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Earley S, Waldron BJ, Brayden JE. Critical role for transient receptor potential channel TRPM4 in myogenic constriction of cerebral arteries. Circ Res. 2004; 95: 922–929.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Knot HJ, Nelson MT. Regulation of arterial diameter and wall [Ca2+] in cerebral arteries of rat by membrane potential and intravascular pressure. J Physiol. 1998; 508: 199–209.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Cole WC, Chen TT, Clement-Chomienne O. Myogenic regulation of arterial diameter: role of potassium channels with a focus on delayed rectifier potassium current. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2005; 83: 755–765.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Brayden JE, Nelson MT. Regulation of arterial tone by activation of calcium-dependent potassium channels. Science. 1992; 256: 532–535.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Plane F, Johnson R, Kerr P, Wiehler W, Thorneloe K, Ishii K, Chen T, Cole W. Heteromultimeric Kv1 channels contribute to myogenic control of arterial diameter. Circ Res. 2005; 96: 216–224.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Albarwani S, Nemetz LT, Madden JA, Tobin AA, England SK, Pratt PF, Rusch NJ. Voltage-gated K+ channels in rat small cerebral arteries: molecular identity of the functional channels. J Physiol. 2003; 551: 751–763.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Nelson MT, Cheng H, Rubart M, Santana LF, Bonev AD, Knot HJ, Lederer WJ. Relaxation of arterial smooth muscle by calcium sparks. Science. 1995; 270: 633–637.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Robertson BE, Nelson MT. Aminopyridine inhibition and voltage dependence of K+ currents in smooth muscle cells from cerebral arteries. Am J Physiol. 1994; 267: C1589–C1597.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Cheong A, Dedman AM, Xu SZ, Beech DJ. K(V)alpha1 channels in murine arterioles: differential cellular expression and regulation of diameter. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2001; 281: H1057–H1065.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Perez GJ, Bonev AD, Nelson MT. Micromolar Ca(2+) from sparks activates Ca(2+)-sensitive K(+) channels in rat cerebral artery smooth muscle. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2001; 281: C1769–C1775.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Brenner R, Perez GJ, Bonev AD, Eckman DM, Kosek JC, Wiler SW, Patterson AJ, Nelson MT, Aldrich RW. Vasoregulation by the beta1 subunit of the calcium-activated potassium channel. Nature. 2000; 407: 870–876.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Chen TT, Luykenaar KD, Walsh EJ, Walsh MP, Cole WC. Key role of Kv1 channels in vasoregulation. Circ Res. 2006; 99: 53–60.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Gutman GA, Chandy KG, Adelman JP, Aiyar J, Bayliss DA, Clapham DE, Covarriubias M, Desir GV, Furuichi K, Ganetzky B, Garcia ML, Grissmer S, Jan LY, Karschin A, Kim D, Kuperschmidt S, Kurachi Y, Lazdunski M, Lesage F, Lester HA, McKinnon D, Nichols CG, O’Kelly I, Robbins J, Robertson GA, Rudy B, Sanguinetti M, Seino S, Stuehmer W, Tamkun MM, Vandenberg CA, Wei A, Wulff H, Wymore RS; International Union of Pharmacology. XLI Compendium of voltage-gated ion channels: potassium channels. Pharmacol Rev. 2003; 55: 583–586.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Coetzee WA, Amarillo Y, Chiu J, Chow A, Lau D, McCormack T, Moreno H, Nadal MS, Ozaita A, Pountney D, Saganich M, Vega-Saenz de Miera E, Rudy B. Molecular diversity of K+ channels. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999; 868: 233–285.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Pongs O, Leicher T, Berger M, Roeper J, Bahring R, Wray D, Giese KP, Silva AJ, Storm JF. Functional and molecular aspects of voltage-gated K+ channel beta subunits. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999; 868: 344–355.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Kerr PM, Clement-Chomienne O, Thorneloe KS, Chen TT, Ishii K, Sontag DP, Walsh MP, Cole WC. Heteromultimeric Kv1.2-Kv1.5 channels underlie 4-aminopyridine-sensitive delayed rectifier K(+) current of rabbit vascular myocytes. Circ Res. 2001; 89: 1038–1044.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Felix JP, Bugianesi RM, Schmalhofer WA, Borris R, Goetz MA, Hensens OD, Bao JM, Kayser F, Parsons WH, Rupprecht K, Garcia ML, Kaczorowski GJ, Slaughter RS. Identification and biochemical characterization of a novel nortriterpene inhibitor of the human lymphocyte voltage-gated potassium channel, Kv13. Biochemistry. 1999; 38: 4922–4930.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Perozo E, MacKinnon R, Bezanilla F, Stefani E. Gating currents from a nonconducting mutant reveal open-closed conformations in Shaker K+ channels. Neuron. 1993; 11: 353–358.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Thorneloe KS, Nelson MT. Properties and molecular basis of the mouse urinary bladder voltage-gated K+ current. J Physiol. 2003; 549: 65–74.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Cox RH, Rusch NJ. New expression profiles of voltage-gated ion channels in arteries exposed to high blood pressure. Microcirculation. 2002; 9: 243–257.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

Related Article:

Key Role of Kv1 Channels in Vasoregulation
Tim T. Chen, Kevin D. Luykenaar, Emma J. Walsh, Michael P. Walsh, and William C. Cole
Circ. Res. 2006 99: 53-60. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Straub, S. V.
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, M. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Straub, S. V.
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, M. T.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article