Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation Research
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation Research. 2004;95:e72

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Buschmann, I. R.
Right arrow Articles by Hoefer, I. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Buschmann, I. R.
Right arrow Articles by Hoefer, I. E.
(Circulation Research. 2004;95:e72.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.


Letter to the Editor

All Arteriogenesis Is Local? Home Boys Versus the Newcomers

Ivo R. Buschmann

Charité, Dept of Cardiology, Center for Cardiovascular Research, Berlin, Germany, and Albert Ludwigs University Freiburg, Dept of Cardiology, Freiburg, Germany, ivo.buschmann@charite.de

Imo E. Hoefer

Albert Ludwigs University Freiburg, Dept of Cardiology, Freiburg, Germany


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 

To the Editor:

The article by Khmelewski et al1 raises an important question in the field of arteriogenesis: do circulating (mononuclear) cells play a functional role during the adaptive proliferation of preexistent collateral pathways? Khmelewski et al propose that local vascular macrophages, rather than circulating monocytes, are crucial during early phases of arteriogenesis. Several important aspects, however, have not been addressed in the report by Khmelewski et al, and several other points made by the authors are contradictory to the experimental findings of others.

The experimental-induced depletion of monocytes under in vivo conditions is cumbersome and error-prone. Cyclophosphamide (CY) indeed is used as a chemotherapeutic agent. However, it is also a strong macrophage-activating agent. Remarkably, after CY treatment, ED1+, ED2+, and ED3+ macrophage subpopulations, in general, exhibit signs of cellular activation, such as an increase in the number and size of cells. In addition, there is an upregulation of the ED1, ED2, and ED3 reactive surface molecule expression in all organs.2 Hence, the pretreatment with CY might very well explain the increase in the number of tissue resident macrophages. We propose to study such effects in a nonpharmacological model of monocyte deficiency, eg, under osteopetrotic conditions.3 Khmelewski et al used only a surrogate marker for arteriogenesis, the proliferative index of collateral arteries. The effects of the cell infusion and MCP-1 infusion, respectively, on collateral dependant tissue perfusion have not been investigated. Thus evidence about the functionality of the leukocyte and CC-chemokine infusion is lacking.

The results of Khmelewski et al . . . [Full Text of this Article]