Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation Research
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation Research. 2004;94:271-272
doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000119803.07796.CA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stewart, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Langille, B. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stewart, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Langille, B. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Endothelium/vascular type/nitric oxide
Right arrow Angiogenesis
Right arrow Risk Factors
Right arrow Physiological and pathological control of gene expression
(Circulation Research. 2004;94:271.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.


Editorials

Tied Down by Shear Force

Role for Tie1 in Postnatal Vascular Remodeling?

Duncan J. Stewart, B. Lowell Langille

From the Terrence Donnelly Research Laboratories (D.J.S.), Division of Cardiology, St Michael’s Hospital, and the Department of Medicine, University of Toronto; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology (D.J.S., B.L.L.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Correspondence to Duncan J. Stewart, Dexter Hung-Cho Man Chair and Head of the Division of Cardiology, St Michael’s Hospital, 30 Bond St, Suite 7-081 Queen Wing, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5B 1W8. E-mail stewartd{at}smh.toronto.on.ca


Key Words: shear force • arterial remodeling • postnatal vascular function

Shear forces play an important role in the regulation of vascular function and structure. Since the initial demonstration of flow-dependent dilation, the critical role of the endothelium in sensing changes in intimal shear stress, and transducing these into changes in vascular tone, has been well recognized.1–3 The moment-to-moment adjustments in arterial diameter involve the release of endothelial-derived vasoactive factors, in particular NO, and play a central role in optimizing the conductance of the large arterial tree and maintaining peak efficiency of the circulation even when subjected to profound changes in blood flow.4 However, the mechanisms governing the longer-term adaptations of vascular diameter and branching are equally or even more important for ensuring the appropriate development, patterning, and structure of the arterial tree, but they have not been well characterized. Here, too, the endothelium plays a pivotal role in adapting the diameter of an artery to persistent changes in flow,5 in this case by structural changes in the medial layers, rather than just vasomotion.6 Although it is likely that endothelial-derived vasoactive factors such as NO7 also play an important role in this process as well, the full cast of mediators of arterial remodeling remains to be defined.

It is perhaps not surprising that many of the same factors that mediate angiogenesis during blood vessel development may contribute to the remodeling of blood vessels in response to changing flow conditions and vice versa. For example, endothelium-derived NO, the classical mediator of shear-induced changes in vascular diameter, has recently been recognized as an important downstream mediator of the angiogenic effects of a wide range of factors, including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF),8 basic fibroblast growth factor (FGF),9 and recently angiopoietin-1 (Ang-1).10 The angiopoietins represent a family of angiogenic factors that bind to the endothelial-selective receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK), Tie2,11 and mediate vascular maturation by inducing the recruitment of pericytes and smooth muscle to invest the nascent arterial media, causing enlargement and increasing the complexity of the developing vascular tree. There is evidence that vascular pressures influence the recruitment/differentiation of mural cells in the microcirculation12 and the Ang/Tie2 system represents an attractive candidate system for mediating chronic adaptation of blood vessels to long-term hemodynamic changes.

In this issue of Circulation Research, Porat and colleagues13 provide new insight into an unexpected contribution of a related RTK, Tie1, to changes in vascular structure in response to luminal hemodynamic conditions. Although sharing significant homology with Tie2, Tie1 has no known ligand,14 and its function is very much a matter of debate. The present demonstration that Tie1 expression is exquisitely related to vascular regions exposed to disturbed flow in both physiological and pathological conditions is very suggestive of a role in transducing changes in shear forces and possibly participating in mediating the subsequent remodeling of the arterial wall. However, this report raises more questions than it provides answers. For example, what is the functional consequence of elevated Tie1 expression and what does this have to do with vascular remodeling and the development of atherosclerosis?

Recently, Chen-Konak et al15 found that initiating normal arterial levels of shear (10 dyne/cm2) induced transient downregulation of Tie1 expression. Protein levels returned to those of static cultures over 2 hours; however, subsequent increases or decreases in shear at this level could again inhibit Tie1 expression. These findings are thought provoking. In the context of the work of Porat et al13 they may indicate that low levels of shear at specific arterial sites can de-repress Tie1 expression while it is persistently inhibited at other sites by higher levels of shear that routinely fluctuate with changing physiological demands for tissue perfusion. Notably, Chen-Konak et al found that downregulation was accompanied by cleavage of Tie1 and binding of the endodomain to the Tie2 receptor, so Tie1 processing may have important implications for angiopoietin signaling. This association mirrors Tie1 responses to stimulation of endothelium with VEGF or phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA).16–19 However, once more, it is uncertain what the functional consequences of such an interaction would be. Some additional insight into this question might have been gained by testing the expression and activation state of Tie2 in regions of high and low Tie1 expression, but it would still not have been possible in vivo to distinguish any regulatory interactions between these receptors from a direct effect of shear forces on Tie2 itself.

Nonetheless, it seems inescapable that the observations of Porat and colleagues13 must provide an important clue as to the role of Tie1 in the postnatal vasculature—but what role? Does Tie1 contribute in some way to vascular remodeling? To address this question, it would be of interest to determine whether its expression is increased in the classical models of chronic arterial remodeling with increases or decreases in flow. What is the significance of upregulation of Tie1 in the context of atherosclerosis and aneurysms? Is it part of a protective mechanism, as has been suggested for the Ang-1/Tie2 pathway, or does it contribute to the pathogenesis of vascular disease? These are critical questions that are raised by the present report and represent important challenges for investigators in this field. However, what does seem certain is that the work of Porat and colleagues has raised the bar in the Tie1 sweepstakes, clearly placing a higher premium on the elucidation of this system by pointing to a potential contribution in the regulation of postnatal vascular structure and function.

Footnotes

The opinions expressed in this editorial are not necessarily those of the editors or of the American Heart Association.

See related article, pages 394–401

References

  1. Holtz J, Forstermann U, Pohl U, Giesler M, Bassenge E. Flow-dependent, endothelium-mediated dilation of epicardial coronary arteries in conscious dogs: effects of cyclooxygenase inhibition. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1984; 6: 1161–1169.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Pohl U, Holtz J, Busse R, Bassenge E. Crucial role of endothelium in the vasodilator response to increased flow in vivo. Hypertension. 1986; 8: 37–44.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Topper JN, Gimbrone MA Jr. Blood flow and vascular gene expression: fluid shear stress as a modulator of endothelial phenotype. Mol Med Today. 1999; 5: 40–46.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Griffith TM, Edwards DH, Davies RL, Harrison TJ, Evans KT. EDRF coordinates the behaviour of vascular resistance vessels. Nature. 1987; 329: 442–445.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Langille BL, O’Donnell F. Reductions in arterial diameter produced by chronic decreases in blood flow are endothelium-dependent. Science. 1986; 231: 405–407.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Langille BL. Blood flow-induced remodeling of the artery wall. In: Bevan JA, Kaley G, Rubanyi G, eds. Flow-Dependent Regulation of Vascular Function. Oxford, NY; 1995: 277–299.
  7. Rudic RD, Shesely EG, Maeda N, Smithies O, Segal SS, Sessa WC. Direct evidence for the importance of endothelium-derived nitric oxide in vascular remodeling. J Clin Invest. 1998; 101: 731–736.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Morbidelli L, Chang CH, Douglas JG, Granger HJ, Ledda F, Ziche M. Nitric oxide mediates mitogenic effect of VEGF on coronary venular endothelium. Am J Physiol. 1996; 270: H411–H415.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Babaei S, Teichert-Kuliszewska K, Monge JC, Mohamed F, Bendeck MP, Stewart DJ. Role of nitric oxide in the angiogenic response in vitro to basic fibroblast growth factor. Circ Res. 1998; 82: 1007–1015.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Babaei S, Teichert-Kuliszewska K, Zhang Q, Jones N, Dumont DJ, Stewart DJ. Angiogenic actions of angiopoietin-1 require endothelium-derived nitric oxide. Am J Pathol. 2003; 162: 1927–1936.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Davis S, Aldrich TH, Jones PF, Acheson A, Compton DL, Jain V, Ryan TE, Bruno J, Radziejewski C, Maisonpierre PC, Yancopoulos GD. Isolation of angiopoietin-1, a ligand for the TIE2 receptor, by secretion-trap expression cloning. Cell. 1996; 87: 1161–1169.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Van Gieson EJ, Murfee WL, Skalak TC, Price RJ. Enhanced smooth muscle cell coverage of microvessels exposed to increased hemodynamic stresses in vivo. Circ Res. 2003; 92: 1–9.[Free Full Text]
  13. Porat RM, Grunewald M, Globerman A, Itin A, Barshtein G, Alhonen L, Alitalo K, Keshet E. Specific induction of tie1 promoter by disturbed flow in atherosclerosis-prone vascular niches and flow-obstructing pathologies. Circ Res. 2004; 94: 394–401.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Yancopoulos GD, Davis S, Gale NW, Rudge JS, Wiegand SJ, Holash J. Vascular-specific growth factors and blood vessel formation. Nature. 2000; 407: 242–248.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Chen-Konak L, Guetta-Shubin Y, Yahav H, Shay-Salit A, Zilberman M, Binah O, Resnick N. Transcriptional and post-translation regulation of the Tie1 receptor by fluid shear stress changes in vascular endothelial cells. FASEB J. 2003; 17: 2121–2123.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Yabkowitz R, Meyer S, Yanagihara D, Brankow D, Staley T, Elliott G, Hu S, Ratzkin B. Inflammatory cytokines and vascular endothelial growth factor stimulate the release of soluble tie receptor from human endothelial cells via metalloprotease activation. Blood. 1999; 93: 1969–1979.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. McCarthy MJ, Burrows R, Bell SC, Christie G, Bell PR, Brindle NP. Potential roles of metalloprotease mediated ectodomain cleavage in signaling by the endothelial receptor tyrosine kinase Tie-1. Lab Invest. 1999; 79: 889–895.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Tsiamis AC, Morris PN, Marron MB, Brindle NP. Vascular endothelial growth factor modulates the Tie-2: Tie-1 receptor complex. Microvasc Res. 2002; 63: 149–158.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Yabkowitz R, Meyer S, Yanagihara D, Brankow D, Staley T, Elliott G, Hu S, Ratzkin B. Regulation of tie receptor expression on human endothelial cells by protein kinase C-mediated release of soluble tie. Blood. 1997; 90: 706–715.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HypertensionHome page
A. R. Pries, B. Reglin, and T. W. Secomb
Remodeling of Blood Vessels: Responses of Diameter and Wall Thickness to Hemodynamic and Metabolic Stimuli
Hypertension, October 1, 2005; 46(4): 725 - 731.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stewart, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Langille, B. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stewart, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Langille, B. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Endothelium/vascular type/nitric oxide
Right arrow Angiogenesis
Right arrow Risk Factors
Right arrow Physiological and pathological control of gene expression