This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Tsikas, D. Articles by Frölich, J. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Tsikas, D. Articles by Frölich, J. C.

(Circulation Research. 2002;90:e39.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.

Letter to the Editor

S-Nitrosoalbumin Plasma Levels in Health and Disease: Facts or Artifacts? Value of Analytical Chemistry in Nitric Oxide Clinical Research

Dimitrios Tsikas, Jürgen C. Frölich

Hannover Medical School, Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Hannover, Germany, tsikas.dimitros@mh-hannover.de

To the Editor:

The discovery of the endothelium-derived relaxing factor (EDRF), its identification as nitric oxide (^·NO), and the recognition of its multiple biological functions, especially in the cardiovascular system, are fascinating scientific achievements of the last two decades, an effort that was awarded the Nobel Prize for Medicine in 1998.

Curiously, no other small molecule like ^·NO challenges so many scientists from so very different disciplines. In the literature, there is no further example for the development and application of so wide a spectrum of analytical approaches and methods in recent years that has yielded highly divergent values, often within a range of three orders of magnitude, and has consequently led to numerous deceptive conclusions.

In 1992, Stamler et al¹ reported for the first time that ^·NO circulates in plasma of healthy humans primarily as S-nitrosoalbumin (SNALB; 7000 nmol/L, n=5). Mainly on the basis of this finding, Stamler’s group¹ suggested that SNALB may be a physiological reservoir of ^·NO, by which ^·NO-related actions such as vasodilation are regulated in humans. This highly interesting finding has initiated much scientific work in this area.

Until today, however, there is no solid confirmation, perhaps with a single exception,² of Stamler’s originally reported values for endogenous normal plasma levels of SNALB, not even by Stamler himself, who communicated³ in 1997 that normal SNALB plasma levels may be much lower, ie 200 to 1000 nmol/L.

In 1999, for the first time, we questioned⁴ Stamler’s findings on endogenous normal SNALB plasma levels. By means of a . . . [Full Text of this Article]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Giustarini, R. Rossi, Z. Massy, T. Drueke, D. Borderie, and B. Lacour Plasma S-nitrosothiols and chronic renal failure Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, December 1, 2004; 287(6): F1294 - F1295. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Tsikas and J. C. Frolich Are plasma S-nitrosothiol levels elevated in chronic renal failure? Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 1, 2003; 18(10): 2199 - 2199. [Full Text] [PDF]