Original Contribution |
Presented at the 23rd Annual Meeting of the Society for Biomaterials, New Orleans, La, April 30May 4, 1997, and the 70th Scientific Sessions of the American Heart Association, Orlando, Fla, November 912, 1997, and published in abstract form (Circulation. 1997;96[suppl I]:I-402).
From the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory and Coronary Care Unit, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass, and Harvard-MIT Division of Health Science and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass.
Correspondence to Campbell Rogers, MD, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115. E-mail cdrogers{at}bics.bwh.harvard.edu
AbstractEndovascular stents expand the arterial lumen more than balloon angioplasty and reduce rates of restenosis after coronary angioplasty in selected patients. Understanding the factors involved in vascular injury imposed during stent deployment may allow optimization of stent design and stent-placement protocols so as to limit vascular injury and perhaps reduce restenosis. Addressing the hypothesis that a previously undescribed mechanism of vascular injury during stent deployment is balloon-artery interaction, we have used finite element analysis to model how balloon-artery contact stress and area depend on stent-strut geometry, balloon compliance, and inflation pressure. We also examined superficial injury during deployment of stents of varied design in vivo and in a phantom model ex vivo to show that balloon-induced damage can be modulated by altering stent design. Our results show that higher inflation pressures, wider stent-strut openings, and more compliant balloon materials cause markedly larger surface-contact areas and contact stresses between stent struts. Appreciating that the contact stress and contact area are functions of placement pressure, stent geometry, and balloon compliance may help direct development of novel stent designs and stent-deployment protocols so as to minimize vascular injury during stenting and perhaps to optimize long-term outcomes.
Key Words: stent restenosis vascular injury balloon finite element analysis
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. A. Holzapfel, G. Sommer, C. T. Gasser, and P. Regitnig Determination of layer-specific mechanical properties of human coronary arteries with nonatherosclerotic intimal thickening and related constitutive modeling Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2005; 289(5): H2048 - H2058. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Balakrishnan, A. R. Tzafriri, P. Seifert, A. Groothuis, C. Rogers, and E. R. Edelman Strut Position, Blood Flow, and Drug Deposition: Implications for Single and Overlapping Drug-Eluting Stents Circulation, June 7, 2005; 111(22): 2958 - 2965. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Vogt, A. Stein, G. Rettemeier, N. Krott, R. Hoffmann, J. v. Dahl, A.-K. Bosserhoff, W. Michaeli, P. Hanrath, C. Weber, et al. Long-term assessment of a novel biodegradable paclitaxel-eluting coronary polylactide stent Eur. Heart J., August 1, 2004; 25(15): 1330 - 1340. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. F. LaDisa Jr., L. E. Olson, I. Guler, D. A. Hettrick, S. H. Audi, J. R. Kersten, D. C. Warltier, and P. S. Pagel Stent design properties and deployment ratio influence indexes of wall shear stress: a three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics investigation within a normal artery J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2004; 97(1): 424 - 430. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J Gunn, N Arnold, K H Chan, L Shepherd, D C Cumberland, and D C Crossman Coronary artery stretch versus deep injury in the development of in-stent neointima Heart, October 1, 2002; 88(4): 401 - 405. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Briguori, C. Sarais, P. Pagnotta, F. Liistro, M. Montorfano, A. Chieffo, F. Sgura, N. Corvaja, R. Albiero, G. Stankovic, et al. In-stent restenosis in small coronary arteries: Impact of strut thickness J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 7, 2002; 40(3): 403 - 409. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Haude and R. Erbel How big is small? Eur. Heart J., February 1, 2002; 23(3): 198 - 199. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Briguori, J. Tobis, T. Nishida, M. Vaghetti, R. Albiero, C. Di Mario, and A. Colombo Discrepancy between angiography and intravascular ultrasound when analysing small coronary arteries Eur. Heart J., February 1, 2002; 23(3): 247 - 254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Windecker and B. Meier All stents are not alike or is the difference in the eye of the observer only? Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2001; 22(21): 1973 - 1977. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Hoffmann, C. Jansen, A. Konig, P.K. Haager, G. Kerckhoff, J. Vom Dahl, V. Klauss, P. Hanrath, and H. Mudra Stent design related neointimal tissue proliferation in human coronary arteries; an intravascular ultrasound study Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2001; 22(21): 2007 - 2014. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Windecker, I. Mayer, G. De Pasquale, W. Maier, O. Dirsch, P. De Groot, Y.-P. Wu, G. Noll, B. Leskosek, B. Meier, et al. Stent Coating With Titanium-Nitride-Oxide for Reduction of Neointimal Hyperplasia Circulation, August 21, 2001; 104(8): 928 - 933. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Vernhet, R. Demaria, J. M. Juan, M. C. Oliva-Lauraire, J. P. Senac, and M. Dauzat Changes in Wall Mechanics After Endovascular Stenting in the Rabbit Aorta: Comparison of Three Stent Designs Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2001; 176(3): 803 - 807. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. E. Drachman, E. R. Edelman, P. Seifert, A. R. Groothuis, D. A. Bornstein, K. R. Kamath, M. Palasis, D. Yang, S. H. Nott, and C. Rogers Neointimal thickening after stent delivery of paclitaxel: change in composition and arrest of growth over six months J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 1, 2000; 36(7): 2325 - 2332. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Hoffmann and G.S. Mintz Coronary in-stent restenosis--predictors, treatment and prevention Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2000; 21(21): 1739 - 1749. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Ahmed, G. S. Mintz, N. J. Weissman, A. J. Lansky, A. D. Pichard, L. F. Satler, and K. M. Kent Mechanism of Lumen Enlargement During Intracoronary Stent Implantation : An Intravascular Ultrasound Study Circulation, July 4, 2000; 102(1): 7 - 10. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Garasic, E. R. Edelman, J. C. Squire, P. Seifert, M. S. Williams, and C. Rogers Stent and Artery Geometry Determine Intimal Thickening Independent of Arterial Injury Circulation, February 22, 2000; 101(7): 812 - 818. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Overhaus, J. Heckenkamp, S. Kossodo, D. Leszczynski, and G. M. LaMuraglia Photodynamic Therapy Generates a Matrix Barrier to Invasive Vascular Cell Migration Circ. Res., February 18, 2000; 86(3): 334 - 340. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Circulation Research Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1999 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |