Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation Research
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation Research. 1999;84:1361-1364

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vatner, S. F.
Right arrow Articles by Yazaki, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vatner, S. F.
Right arrow Articles by Yazaki, Y.
(Circulation Research. 1999;84:1361-1364.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.


Editorial

Eight Years Behind the Masthead

Stephen F. Vatner, Bradford C. Berk, Thomas H. Hintze, Leslie A. Leinwand, Peter Libby, Eduardo Marbán, Ketty Schwartz, Harold C. Strauss, Yoshio Yazaki

From the Editor in Chief and Associate Editors, Circulation Research.

Correspondence to Stephen F. Vatner, MD, Allegheny University of the Health Sciences, 320 East North Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15212. E-mail svatner@pgh.auhs.edu


Key Words: cardiovascular research • molecular biology • vascular biology

The editorship of Circulation Research changes as of this issue. We wish Dr. Marbán and his new Associate Editors well and take this opportunity to highlight some of the key features of our editorship, which began in 1991 at Boston and ends in 1999 at Pittsburgh.

It is important to keep in mind that in 1991 the application of molecular biology to cardiovascular research was well underway. Our goal at that time was not only to capitalize on the new science that was emerging but also to integrate it with physiology. This was difficult to accomplish, since the two scientific camps enjoyed little communication. We believe one of the major strengths of this Journal is its place as a forum to present the best of both of these scientific disciplines. At present, most articles use at least some part of a molecular approach, but most often combine it with some functional data. This integrative approach is becoming more popular in medical schools as well as at the National Institutes of Health in terms of new programs.1

A second goal was to incorporate more vascular biology into Circulation Research. We believe this effort has also been successful, as reflected by the increasing number of basic vascular biology papers published in the Journal. Currently, at least 50% of the manuscripts published deal primarily with the vessel rather than the myocardium (Figure 1Down).



View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Vascular vs cardiac biology. This graph illustrates the percentage of vascular biology papers published compared . . . [Full Text of this Article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
T. H. Hintze and E. Marban
Two AHA Councils Become One : Ringing Out the Old and Bringing in the New
Circ. Res., August 6, 1999; 85(3): 219 - 220.
[Full Text] [PDF]