Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation Research
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation Research. 1991;68:1532-1548

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Campbell, K. B.
Right arrow Articles by Kirkpatrick, R. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Campbell, K. B.
Right arrow Articles by Kirkpatrick, R. D.

Circulation Research, Vol 68, 1532-1548, Copyright © 1991 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Short-time-scale left ventricular systolic dynamics. Evidence for a common mechanism in both left ventricular chamber and heart muscle mechanics

KB Campbell, SG Shroff and RD Kirkpatrick
Department of VCAPP, Washington State University, Pullman 99164-6520.

Based on the premise that short-time-scale, small-amplitude pressure/volume/outflow behavior of the left ventricular chamber was dominated by dynamic processes originating in cardiac myofilaments, a prototype model was built to predict pressure responses to volume perturbations. In the model, chamber pressure was taken to be the product of the number of generators in a pressure-bearing state and their average volumetric distortion, as in the muscle theory of A.F. Huxley, in which force was equal to the number of attached crossbridges and their average lineal distortion. Further, as in the muscle theory, pressure generators were assumed to cycle between two states, the pressure-bearing state and the non-pressure-bearing state. Experiments were performed in the isolated ferret heart, where variable volume decrements (0.01-0.12 ml) were removed at two commanded flow rates (flow clamps, -7 and -14 ml/sec). Pressure responses to volume removals were analyzed. Although the prototype model accounted for most features of the pressure responses, subtle but systematic discrepancies were observed. The presence or absence of flow and the magnitude of flow affected estimates of model parameters. However, estimates of parameters did not differ when the model was fitted to flow clamps with similar magnitudes of flows but different volume changes. Thus, prototype model inadequacies were attributed to misrepresentations of flow-related effects but not of volume-related effects. Based on these discrepancies, an improved model was built that added to the simple two- state cycling scheme, a pathway to a third state. This path was followed only in response to volume change. The improved model eliminated the deficiencies of the prototype model and was adequate in accounting for all observations. Since the template for the improved model was taken from the cycling crossbridge theory of muscle contraction, it was concluded that, in spite of the complexities of geometry, architecture, and regional heterogeneity of function and structure, crossbridge mechanisms dominated the short-time-scale dynamics of left ventricular chamber behavior.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
K. B. Campbell, A. M. Simpson, S. G. Campbell, H. L. Granzier, and B. K. Slinker
Dynamic left ventricular elastance: a model for integrating cardiac muscle contraction into ventricular pressure-volume relationships
J Appl Physiol, April 1, 2008; 104(4): 958 - 975.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
K. B. Campbell, Y. Wu, A. M. Simpson, R. D. Kirkpatrick, S. G. Shroff, H. L. Granzier, and B. K. Slinker
Dynamic myocardial contractile parameters from left ventricular pressure-volume measurements
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2005; 289(1): H114 - H130.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
J. Shimizu, K. Todaka, and D. Burkhoff
Load dependence of ventricular performance explained by model of calcium-myofilament interactions
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 2002; 282(3): H1081 - H1091.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
A. Landesberg and S. Sideman
Force-velocity relationship and biochemical-to-mechanical energy conversion by the sarcomere
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, April 1, 2000; 278(4): H1274 - H1284.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
D. S. Berger, S. K. Fellner, K. A. Robinson, K. Vlasica, I. E. Godoy, and S. G. Shroff
Disparate effects of three types of extracellular acidosis on left ventricular function
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, February 1, 1999; 276(2): H582 - H594.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
K. B. Campbell, Y. Wu, R. D. Kirkpatrick, and B. K. Slinker
Left ventricular pressure response to small-amplitude, sinusoidal volume changes in isolated rabbit heart
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, October 1, 1997; 273(4): H2044 - H2061.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]