Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation Research
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation Research. 1981;48:62-69

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Busija, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Heistad, D. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Busija, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Heistad, D. D.

Circulation Research, Vol 48, 62-69, Copyright © 1981 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Effects of cholinergic nerves on cerebral blood flow in cats

DW Busija and DD Heistad

We studied the effects of parasympathetic nerves on cerebral blood flow (CBF). The greater superficial petrosal nerve, which apparently supplies cholinergic fibers to cerebral vessels and the lacrimal gland, was sectioned on one side at the internal auditory meatus in anesthetized cats. CBF was measured with 15-microns microspheres. Section of the petrosal nerve did not alter resting CBF. In addition, electrical stimulation of the distal cut end of the petrosal nerve had no effect on total CBF. In one area of the brain, the caudate nucleus, stimulation increased blood flow from 29 +/- 2 to 36 +/- 2 (mean +/- SE) ml/min per 100 g. Lacrimal gland blood flow increased from 42 +/- 7 to 198 +/- 32 ml/min per 100 g during petrosal stimulation, which indicates that the stimulus was potent. In the same experiments, CBF increased 3- to 4-fold during hypercapnia; thus, cerebral vessels were responsive to another dilator stimulus. In other experiments, petrosal nerve section did not alter the response of cerebral vessels to hypercapnia (PCO2 > 50 mm Hg) or hypoxia (PO2 < 34 mm Hg). We conclude: (1) there is little or no resting vasodilator tone provided to cerebral vessels by the petrosal nerve; (2) petrosal nerve stimulation has a major effect on blood flow to the lacrimal gland but does not increase CBF; and (3) petrosal nerve section has little effect on the response of cerebral vessels to hypercapnia or hypoxia.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
R. Zhang and B. D. Levine
Autonomic Ganglionic Blockade Does Not Prevent Reduction in Cerebral Blood Flow Velocity During Orthostasis in Humans
Stroke, April 1, 2007; 38(4): 1238 - 1244.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
S. Ogoh, R. M. Brothers, Q. Barnes, W. L. Eubank, M. N. Hawkins, S. Purkayastha, A. O-Yurvati, and P. B. Raven
The effect of changes in cardiac output on middle cerebral artery mean blood velocity at rest and during exercise
J. Physiol., December 1, 2005; 569(2): 697 - 704.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
T. Przyby{nmid}owski, M.-F. Bangash, K. Reichmuth, B. J Morgan, J. B Skatrud, and J. A Dempsey
Mechanisms of the cerebrovascular response to apnoea in humans
J. Physiol., April 1, 2003; 548(1): 323 - 332.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. Zhang, J. H. Zuckerman, K. Iwasaki, T. E. Wilson, C. G. Crandall, and B. D. Levine
Autonomic Neural Control of Dynamic Cerebral Autoregulation in Humans
Circulation, October 1, 2002; 106(14): 1814 - 1820.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]