Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation Research
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation Research. 2009;104:931-932
doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.109.196980
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shyy, J. Y.-J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shyy, J. Y.-J.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article
(Circulation Research. 2009;104:931.)
© 2009 American Heart Association, Inc.


Editorials

Extracellular Matrix Differentiating Good Flow Versus Bad Flow

John Y.-J. Shyy

From the Division of Biomedical Sciences, University of California, Riverside.

Correspondence to John Y.-J. Shyy, PhD, Division of Biomedical Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521. E-mail john.shyy@ucr.edu



See related article, pages 995–1003


Key Words: shear stress • endothelial cells • JNK


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 

Mounting evidence indicates that shear stress, the tangential component of blood flow acting on the vessel wall, is crucial for endothelial functions and pathophysiology. From the vascular biology point of view, arterial areas under laminar flow, with high mean shear stress and little bidirectional oscillation, are atheroprotective, whereas areas under disturbed flow, with oscillation, reverse flow, and low mean shear stress, are atheroprone. This principle holds true for vessel specimens from both human patients and various animal models. To assess the effect of distinct flow patterns at the molecular level, immunocytochemical methods are commonly used to detect the expression of genes in areas experiencing laminar versus disturbed flow. For example, the expression of vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 and intercellular adhesion molecule-1, indicative of vascular inflammation, is markedly enhanced in regions prone to atherosclerosis in low-density lipoprotein receptor-null mice fed an atherogenic diet.1

From the perspective of fluid mechanics, laminar flow has low Reynolds number and is characterized by smooth, constant fluid motion. In contrast, turbulent flow has high Reynolds number and tends to cause eddies, vortices, and other flow disturbances. Flow channels have been used as in vitro models to investigate the mechanisms by which shear stress modulates endothelial functions, because they permit close control over the fluid mechanics imposed on cultured vascular endothelial cells (ECs). Advances in molecular and cell biology, in conjunction with flow channel experiments, have facilitated investigations into the mechanotransduction mechanism by which shear stress modulates gene expression in cultured ECs. Many second-messenger systems in ECs . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Related Article:

The Subendothelial Extracellular Matrix Modulates JNK Activation by Flow
Cornelia Hahn, A. Wayne Orr, John M. Sanders, Krishna A. Jhaveri, and Martin Alexander Schwartz
Circ. Res. 2009 104: 995-1003. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]