Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation Research
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation Research. 2009;104:e25-e26
doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.191569
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pinder, A. G.
Right arrow Articles by James, P. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pinder, A. G.
Right arrow Articles by James, P. E.
(Circulation Research. 2009;104:e25.)
© 2009 American Heart Association, Inc.


Letter to the Editor

When Does Low Oxygen Become Hypoxia? Implications for Nitrite Reduction

Andrew G. Pinder, Philip E. James

Wales Heart Research Institute, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff, United Kingdom, E-mail JamesPP@Cardiff.ac.uk


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 

To the Editor:

Webb and Milsom et al1 present the intriguing finding that endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) and potentially RBCs is responsible under hypoxic conditions for nitrite (NO2bullet) reduction to nitric oxide (NO). Based on several practical and theoretical points of view, the conclusions that the authors draw regarding their data are flawed. It is important that these are considered by the wider Circulation Research readership.

The authors conclude that lack of oxygen (O2) availability to eNOS promotes NO2bullet reduction to NO. Whereas the RBC experiments involve measurement of NO produced by RBC under nitrogen and acidic conditions, the HUVEC experiments were carried out at 5% O2 and 5% CO2 (refer to online data supplement that accompanies the article for details). Although there is no question 5% O2 is lower than 95% or 21% O2 (typical in vitro experimental/growth conditions), it cannot be accepted that 5% O2 (equating to {approx}50 µmol/L O2) is "hypoxic" to cells in culture over a 30-minute incubation period. Mitochondrial cytochrome c will function optimally until extremely low O2 conditions (Km{approx}0.1 µmol/L),2 and perhaps more importantly eNOS functions optimally with a Km{approx}6 to 9 µmol/L.3–4 Limited O2 availability to eNOS is unlikely the cause of the change that the authors have observed under these experimental conditions. The thrust of the article (ie, the reduction of NO2bullet to NO during hypoxia by eNOS) is not valid for HUVECs.

A second issue relates to . . . [Full Text of this Article]