Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation Research
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation Research. 2007;100:1543-1545
doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.107.101101
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boyett, M.R.
Right arrow Articles by Dobrzynski, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boyett, M.R.
Right arrow Articles by Dobrzynski, H.
(Circulation Research. 2007;100:1543.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.


Editorials

The Sinoatrial Node Is Still Setting the Pace 100 Years After its Discovery

M.R. Boyett, H. Dobrzynski

From the Cardiovascular Research Group, School of Medicine, University of Manchester, Core Technology Facility, Manchester, UK.

Correspondence to Professor M.R. Boyett, Cardiovascular Research Group, School of Medicine, University of Manchester, Core Technology Facility, 46 Grafton Street, Manchester, M13 9NT, UK. E-mail mark.boyett{at}manchester.ac.uk



See related article, pages 1605–1614


Key Words: sinoatrial node • store-operated Ca2+ channels • TRP channels • intracellular Ca2+ • pacemaking

The mammalian sinoatrial node, the pacemaker of the heart, was discovered 100 years ago in the countryside of Kent (UK) in "a cosy, squat, red-roofed farm-house, embowered in creepers, separated from the road by a richly stocked garden" with "a horse going round and round winding up a huge bucket from a very deep well" and a "farmyard, filled with healthy farmyard manure".1 Arthur Keith (later Sir Arthur) had converted the drawing room into a laboratory and recruited the assistance of Martin Flack, the son of the local butcher and grocer and a young medical student at the time.1 One evening when Keith and his wife, Celia, returned from a bicycle ride, Flack showed him a "wonderful structure" he had discovered in the heart of a mole (perhaps caught on the farm?)—so was discovered the sinoatrial node. Keith and Flack published the discovery of the sinoatrial node in 1907 in the Journal of Anatomy and Physiology.2 Curiously, only a few years later, Keith was to become embroiled in one of the biggest scientific scandals of all time, ‘Piltdown man’, a fraudulent ‘missing link’. Now 100 years after the discovery of the sinoatrial node, we are still making new discoveries about the workings of the sinoatrial node as shown by the paper from Ju and Allen and colleagues in this issue of Circulation Research—the sinoatrial node is still setting the pace!3

In the 1970s and 1980s a flurry of voltage clamp studies, first on multicellular preparations of sinoatrial node tissue and then on isolated sinoatrial node cells, appeared to establish the mechanism of pacemaking in the sinoatrial node.4 At this time, pacemaking was primarily thought to be result of the decay of delayed rectifier K+ current (K+ current decay hypothesis) together with the activation of various inward currents (funny current and T- and L-type Ca2+ currents) and facilitated by an elusive inward background current and the lack of inward rectifier K+ current.4 At the same time, it was known that in Ca2+-overloaded Purkinje fibers or ventricular muscle, spontaneous Ca2+ release could occur from the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR). By activating inward Na+-Ca2+ exchange current, this could produce "TDs" or transient depolarizations, which in turn could result in abnormal pacemaker activity; this abnormal pacemaker activity (resulting from an "internal oscillator") was thought to be distinct from sinoatrial node pacemaker activity (resulting from a "surface membrane oscillator").5 Ju and Allen were among the first to raise the possibility that SR Ca2+ release together with Na+-Ca2+ exchange could be involved in normal pacemaking in the heart.6 Ju and Allen worked on the sinus venosus of the toad,6 while Terrar and Lakatta and colleagues extended the concept to the mammalian sinoatrial node.7,8 Although all investigators agree that intracellular Ca2+ is involved in pacemaking, there is controversy concerning the degree of its importance.9 Our view is that many factors are involved in pacemaking, for example rapid and slow delayed rectifier K+ currents, funny current, cardiac and neuronal-type Na+ currents, T and L-type Ca2+ currents, as well as inward Na+-Ca2+ exchange current (regulated by intracellular Ca2+).10 Now Ju and Allen and colleagues have introduced another factor that is possibly involved in pacemaking: store-operated Ca2+ channels (SOCCs).3

SOCCs are Ca2+ permeable channels; they are voltage-independent and, therefore, distinct from the voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels (Cav channels).11 SOCCs are activated by the emptying of intracellular Ca2+ stores, and the subsequent Ca2+ influx via the SOCCs results in a refilling of the stores.11 SOCCs are well known to be important Ca2+ influx pathways in nonexcitable cells, and there is accumulating evidence that they exist in excitable cells, including cardiac ventricular myocytes.11–13 Despite intense research, the nature of the Ca2+ sensor in the Ca2+ stores and the signal between the sensor and the SOCCs is unknown.11 The identity of SOCCs is still debated, but TRPCs are likely contenders.11 The TRP (transient receptor potential) channel was first identified in Drosophila, in which it is involved in phototransduction.11 There are seven TRPC family members (TRPC1–7) in mammals, and there is evidence (some of which is controversial and disputed) that 6 of the TRPC channels are SOCCs (the exception is TRPC6).11

Ju et al3 report evidence (from RT-PCR) of transcripts for 6 of the 7 TRPC channels (the exception is TRPC5) in the sinoatrial node. Using immunocytochemistry, they show evidence of some of the TRPC channels at the protein level in sinoatrial node cells: TRPC1, TRPC3, TRPC4, and TRPC6. In particular, Ju et al3 show evidence of TRPC3 and TRPC4 proteins in the sarcolemma of sinoatrial node cells. Most impressively, Ju et al3 show functional evidence of SOCCs in the sinoatrial node: they show that, after store (ie, SR) depletion by removal of extracellular Ca2+, the restoration of extracellular Ca2+ results in a seemingly massive rise in intracellular Ca2+. The rise is most likely the result of Ca2+ influx—it is greatly increased by blocking SR Ca2+ uptake by cyclopiazonic acid. Blocking L-type Ca2+ channels (by nifedipine) or the Na+-Ca2+ exchanger (by KBR7943) has little or no effect on the Ca2+ influx signal, whereas it is greatly reduced by the SOCC blockers (admittedly, not specific), Gd3+ and SKF96365. Ju et al3 suggest that SOCCs, as well as being involved in Ca2+ handling in the sinoatrial node, may carry a significant inward current, because when they applied the SOCC blocker, SKF96365, pacemaking was significantly slowed. Furthermore, they suggest that there may be a complex interaction between SOCCs, the SR, and Na+-Ca2+ exchange. For example, cyclopiazonic acid is expected to cause a decrease in the SR Ca2+ content and, therefore, a decrease in SR Ca2+ release and, therefore, a decrease in inward Na+-Ca2+ exchange current. This is expected to slow pacemaking. However, the decrease in SR Ca2+ content is expected to increase inward SOCC current, and this will oppose any slowing of pacemaking as a result of the decrease in inward Na+-Ca2+ exchange current.

It is possible that SOCCs are more important in the sinoatrial node than in the working myocardium—whereas Ju et al3 measured substantial SOCC-mediated Ca2+ influx in all sinoatrial node preparations, Nakayama et al13 only observed a "very subtle" SOCC-mediated Ca2+ influx (measured using a comparable protocol) in {approx}25% of mouse, presumably ventricular, myocytes. If SOCCs are more important in the sinoatrial node, this would be a difference in Ca2+ handling between the sinoatrial node and the working myocardium. Such a difference would not be a surprise, because Ca2+ handling in the sinoatrial node and the working myocardium has been shown to be different in many other respects (Figure). As compared with working myocardial cells, cells from the center of the sinoatrial node:


Figure 1
View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Ca2+ handling in the sinoatrial node. A, Immunolabeling of RYR2 in atrial (left) and sinoatrial (right) cells from the rabbit. In the atrial cell, there is subsarcolemmal labeling (corresponding to subsarcolemmal SR) as well as intracellular striated labeling (corresponding to corbular SR; N.B., there are no t tubules in atrial cells). Adapted from Musa et al.14 In the sinoatrial node cells, there is only subsarcolemmal labeling. B, Cartoon of Ca2+ handling in a sinoatrial node cell.

(1) are small and, therefore, their surface area:volume ratio is high—sarcolemmal fluxes of Ca2+ may, therefore, be more influential (Figure, A);
(2) lack t tubules;
(3) only have subsarcolemmal SR—for example, they lack the corbular SR characteristic of atrial cells (Figure, A)14;
(4) express the L-type Ca2+ channel isoform, Cav1.3, as well as or instead of Cav1.215;
(5) possibly have a lower expression of SERCA2a (SR Ca2+ pump), RYR2 (SR Ca2+ release channel), and NCX1 (Na+-Ca2+ exchanger)14,15;
(6) express RYR3 as well as RYR215;
(7) possibly have a higher diastolic intracellular Ca2+ concentration and smaller intracellular Ca2+ transient16; and
(8) have a high intracellular cAMP concentration resulting in oscillatory Ca2+ release from the SR (to facilitate pacemaking).17

In conclusion, Ju et al3 have introduced a new family of channels, the TRPCs, which may play a role in both Ca2+ handling and pacemaking in the sinoatrial node. Of course much remains to be done. Perhaps the most urgent task is to measure SOCC current and function in single sinoatrial node cells. So far, familial (ie, hereditary) sick sinus syndrome (sinoatrial node dysfunction) in patients has been linked to mutations in HCN4 and Nav1.5.10 If SOCCs and other Ca2+ handling proteins are important in pacemaking, it is possible that these too will be linked to familial sick sinus syndrome.


*    Acknowledgments
 
Sources of Funding

M.R.B. and H.D. are supported by the British Heart Foundation (RG/06/005).

Disclosures

None.


*    Footnotes
 
The opinions expressed in this editorial are not necessarily those of the editors or of the American Heart Association.


*    References
up arrowTop
*References
 

  1. Keith A. An Autobiography. Sir Arthur Keith. London: Watts & Co.; 1950.
  2. Keith A, Flack MW. The form and nature of the muscular connections between the primary divisions of the vertebrate heart. Journal of Anatomy and Physiology. 1907; 41: 172–189.
  3. Ju Y-K, Chu Y, Chaulet H, Lai D, Gervasio OL, Graham RM, Cannell MB, Allen DG Store-operated Ca2+ influx and expression of the TRPC genes in mouse sinoatrial node. Circ Res. 2007; 100: 1605–1614.
  4. Irisawa H, Brown HF, Giles W. Cardiac pacemaking in the sino-atrial node. Physiol Rev. 1993; 73: 197–227.[Free Full Text]
  5. Tsien RW, Kass RS, Weingart R. Cellular and subcellular mechanisms of cardiac pacemaker oscillations. J Exp Biol. 1979; 81: 205–215.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Ju Y-K, Allen DG. Intracellular calcium and Na2+-Ca2+ exchange current in isolated toad pacemaker cells. J Physiol. 1998; 508: 153–166.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Rigg L, Terrar DA. Possible role of calcium release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum in pacemaking in guinea-pig sino-atrial node. Exp Physiol. 1996; 81: 877–880.[Abstract]
  8. Bogdanov KY, Vinogradova TM, Lakatta EG. Sinoatrial nodal cell ryanodine receptor and Na+-Ca2+ exchanger: molecular partners in pacemaker regulation. Circ Res. 2001; 88: 1254–1258.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Honjo H, Inada S, Lancaster MK, Yamamoto M, Niwa R, Jones SA, Shibata N, Mitsui K, Horiuchi T, Kamiya K, Kodama I, Boyett MR. Sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ release is not a dominating factor in sinoatrial node pacemaker activity. Circ Res. 2003; 92: e41–e44.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Dobrzynski H, Boyett MR, Anderson RH. New insights into pacemaker activity: promoting understanding of sick sinus syndrome. Circulation. 2007; 115: 1921–1932.[Free Full Text]
  11. Parekh AB, Putney JW Jr. Store-operated calcium channels. Physiol Rev. 2005; 85: 757–810.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Seth M, Sumbilla C, Mullen SP, Lewis D, Klein MG, Hussain A, Soboloff J, Gill DL, Inesi G. Sarco(endo)plasmic reticulum Ca2+ ATPase (SERCA) gene silencing and remodeling of the Ca2+ signaling mechanism in cardiac myocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004; 101: 16683–16688.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Nakayama H, Wilkin BJ, Bodi I, Molkentin JD. Calcineurin-dependent cardiomyopathy is activated by TRPC in the adult mouse heart. FASEB J. 2006; 20: 1660–1670.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Musa H, Lei M, Honjo H, Jones SA, Dobrzynski H, Lancaster MK, Takagishi Y, Henderson Z, Kodama I, Boyett MR. Heterogeneous expression of Ca2+ handling proteins in sinoatrial node. J Histochem Cytochem. 2002; 50: 311–324.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Tellez JO, Dobrzynski H, Greener ID, Graham GM, Laing E, Honjo H, Hubbard SJ, Boyett MR, Billeter R. Differential expression of ion channel transcripts in atrial muscle and sinoatrial node in rabbit. Circ Res. 2006; 99: 1384–1393.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Lancaster MK, Jones SA, Harrison SM, Boyett MR. Intracellular Ca2+ and pacemaking within the rabbit sinoatrial node: heterogeneity of role and control. J Physiol. 2004; 556: 481–494.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Vinogradova TM, Lyashkov AE, Zhu W, Ruknudin AM, Sirenko S, Yang D, Deo S, Barlow M, Johnson S, Caffrey JL, Zhou YY, Xiao RP, Cheng H, Stern MD, Maltsev VA, Lakatta EG. High basal protein kinase A-dependent phosphorylation drives rhythmic internal Ca2+ store oscillations and spontaneous beating of cardiac pacemaker cells. Circ Res. 2006; 98: 505–514.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boyett, M.R.
Right arrow Articles by Dobrzynski, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boyett, M.R.
Right arrow Articles by Dobrzynski, H.