Editorials |
From the Vascular Signalling Group, Institut für Kardiovaskuläre Physiologie, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Correspondence to Ingrid Fleming, PhD, Vascular Signalling Group, Institut für Kardiovaskuläre Physiologie, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, D-60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany. E-mail fleming{at}em.uni-frankfurt.de
See related article, pages 537544
Key Words: endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor hypertension membrane potential microcirculation vasodilatation
Local vascular tone is generally determined by a variety of factors such as neurotransmitters released from autonomic nerves, circulating vasoactive compounds, tissue metabolites, and endothelium-derived autacoids. The best characterized autacoids are the potent vasodilators nitric oxide (NO) and prostacyclin (PGI2) and the vasoconstrictor peptide endothelin-1. Several studies have, however, convincingly demonstrated the existence of an NO/PGI2-independent component of endothelium-dependent relaxation in various arterial beds, most notably in mesenteric, carotid, cerebral, coronary, and renal arteries. Because the NO/PGI2-independent vasodilatation originally described was coincident with vascular smooth muscle hyperpolarization and was abolished by depolarizing concentrations of potassium, it was proposed to be mediated by an endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor or "EDHF."1
When the term EDHF was initially coined, researchers expected to be able to identify a specific chemical entity synthesized in, and released from, the endothelium which hyperpolarizes vascular smooth muscle cells and elicits relaxation. However, there does not seem to be a specific EDHF, as at least 3 principal mechanisms have been linked to the EDHF phenomenon: (1) an increase in endothelial [Ca2+]i after cell stimulation triggers the synthesis of a cytochrome P450 metabolite which is essential for the subsequent EDHF-mediated responses; (2) K+, released from endothelial cells via Ca2+-dependent K+ (K+Ca) channels induces smooth muscle hyperpolarization by activating inwardly rectifying K+ channels or the Na+-K+-ATPase on vascular smooth muscle cells; and (3) endothelial cell hyperpolarization is transmitted to the vascular smooth muscle via gap junctions. The strengths and weaknesses of the arguments for each of these specific types of EDHF have been reviewed recently.2,3
The resting membrane potential of smooth muscle cells in normal pressurized arteries and arterioles is mainly determined by the open probability of K+ and, to a lesser extent, Cl channels and ranges in vivo between 55 and 35 mV, reflecting the fact that arteries are usually partially contracted, a state from which they can constrict or dilate. The mechanism by which hyperpolarization elicits relaxation is controversial, but the most direct and obvious explanation is that the opening of K+ channels hyperpolarizes the smooth muscle cell membrane, reducing the open probability of voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels and activating Ca2+ sequestration and extrusion mechanisms, so that [Ca2+]i is lowered and relaxation can take place. However although the literature relating to EDHF seems confusing, there is widespread agreement that the initial step in all of the EDHF-mediated responses studied to date is activation of small (SKCa) and intermediate conductance K+Ca (IKCa) channels in the endothelium.2 This explains why NO/PGI2-independent hyperpolarization and relaxation are exquisitely sensitive to the combination of charybdotoxin and apamin,47 or the more specific inhibitors TRAM-348 and UCL1684,9 and insensitive to iberiotoxin, an inhibitor of large conductance (BKCa) K+Ca channels. However, the lack of selectivity of the available tools has made it difficult to determine whether the activation of the endothelial IKCa or SKCa or the release of a hyperpolarizing factor such as the cytochrome P450 epoxygenase-derived epoxyeicosatrienoic acids underlies the NO/PGI2-independent responses.10,11 For example, clotrimazole, an inhibitor of cytochrome P450 epoxygenases, also blocks IKCa, whereas charybdotoxin blocks IKCa as well as BKCa.12 Thus it seems that a genetic approach is the only way to elucidate the relative importance of the two channels in EDHF- as well as NO- and PGI2-dependent responses.
In this issue of Circulation Research, Si et al13 report that the targeted deletion of KCa3.1 (to give the IKCa its proper name14) attenuates the acetylcholine (ACh)-induced hyperpolarization of endothelial and vascular smooth muscle cells. These effects were associated with an attenuated EDHF-dependent relaxation of the isolated carotid artery as well as resistance-sized vessels in the cremaster microcirculation indicating that a significant portion of the NO and PGI2-independent relaxation in the arteries studied was related to the opening of KCa3.1 (Figure).
|
With the type of genetic approach used there is a risk that compensation occurs and that the relative importance of remaining KCa channels, in this case the SKCa (or KCa2.3), increases after specific deletion of the KCa3.1. Although resting membrane potential was not different in aortic and carotid artery endothelial cells from wild-type and KCa3.1/ mice, the response to the application of ACh was significantly smaller in cells from animals lacking KCa3.1 and completely reversed by the UCL1684, a specific KCa2.3 blocker. In wild-type mice, UCL1684 had a minimal effect on the ACh-induced hyperpolarization whereas the KCa3.1 blocker TRAM-34 induced complete repolarization. These data indicate that while there does not seem to be a significant role of the endothelial KCa3.1 in the regulating of the resting membrane potential, it plays a key role in the hyperpolarization elicited by agonist stimulation.
That the effects described are related to, and have consequences on, EDHF-mediated responses was demonstrated using a number of approaches. Firstly, there was a marked attenuation (by 88%) of the maximal ACh-induced hyperpolarization of carotid artery smooth muscle cells from KCa3.1/ compared with wild-type mice. Secondly, ACh-induced relaxation in the presence of a NO synthase and cyclooxygenase inhibitor was significantly attenuated in carotid arteries from KCa3.1/ animals. It should be noted that vasodilator responses were also attenuated in arteries from KCa3.1/ mice even in the absence of a NO synthase and cyclooxygenase inhibitor. As the effects of NO synthase inhibition were similar in KCa3.1/ and wild-type animals Si et al13 conclude that NO is unable to compensate for the attenuated EDHF response. This may indeed be the case as while NO has been reported to affect KCa channel opening,15 that of IKCa channels is reported to be NO-independent (at least in rat cerebral arteries) and SKCa are thought to contribute to hyperpolarization only when the endothelial NO synthase is active.16 Finally, the vasodilatation measured in resistance-sized arteries in the cremaster microcirculation was also significantly attenuated by the loss of KCa3.1. In none of the experiments performed was the lack of KCa3.1 associated with any impairment of contractile responses elicited with either an agonist (phenylephrine) or by an increase in transmural pressure (myogenic tone); similarly, endothelium-independent relaxation to sodium nitroprusside was similar in arteries from KCa3.1/ and wild-type animals.
A number of studies relying on a combination of genetic and pharmacological approaches have indicated a potential role for an EDHF in the regulation of blood pressure.17,18 In agreement, the loss of KCa3.1 led to a significant increase in arterial blood pressure (assessed using tail cuff plethysmography and telemetry), and to mild left ventricular hypertrophy. Although the article by Si et al13 indicates the potential importance of KCa3.1 in EDHF-mediated responses, some points regarding the potential interaction between KCa3.1 and KCa2.3 remain to be cleared up, especially as conditional knockout of the latter channel increases myogenic and agonist (phenylephrine)-induced tone as well as systemic blood pressure.19 Unfortunately, there is currently no information regarding EDHF-dependent responses in KCa2.3/ mice. Determining the relevance of an EDHF in the acute regulation of vascular tone as well as in the development of certain pathologies such as hypertension or heart failure is hampered by the fact that there is a certain amount of redundancy in the palette of endothelium-derived vasodilator autacoids that are generated by most vascular beds. The availability of KCa3.1/ animals is likely to prove invaluable in the elucidation of the pathophysiological relevance of the EDHF pathway in different organs.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Studies performed in the authors own laboratory were supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB-TR 23: A6).
Disclosures
None.
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Busse R, Edwards G, Feletou M, Fleming I, Vanhoutte PM, Weston AH. EDHF: bringing the concepts together. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2002; 23: 374380.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Feletou M, Vanhoutte PM. Endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor: where are we now? Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006; 26: 12151225.
4. Marchenko SM, Sage SO. Calcium-activated potassium channels in the endothelium of intact rat aorta. J Physiol (Lond). 1996; 492: 5360.
5. Cai S, Garneau L, Sauve R. Single-channel characterization of the pharmacological properties of the K(Ca2+) channel of intermediate conductance in bovine aortic endothelial cells. J Membr Biol. 1998; 163: 147158.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Edwards G, Dora KA, Gardener MJ, Garland CJ, Weston AH. K+ is an endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor in rat arteries. Nature. 1998; 396: 269272.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Doughty JM, Plane F, Langton PD. Charybdotoxin and apamin block EDHF in rat mesenteric artery if selectively applied to the endothelium. Am J Physiol. 1999; 276: H1107H1112.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Wulff H, Miller MJ, Hansel W, Grissmer S, Cahalan MD, Chandy KG. Design of a potent and selective inhibitor of the intermediate-conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channel, IKCa1: a potential immunosuppressant Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000; 97: 81518156.
9. Rosa JC, Galanakis D, Ganellin CR, Dunn PM, Jenkinson DH. Bis-quinolinium cyclophanes: 6,10-diaza-3(1,3),8(1,4)-dibenzena-1,5(1,4)- diquinolinacyclodecaphane (UCL 1684), the first nanomolar, non-peptidic blocker of the apamin-sensitive Ca2+-activated K+ channel. J Med Chem. 1998; 41: 25.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Campbell WB, Gebremedhin D, Pratt PF, Harder DR. Identification of epoxyeicosatrienoic acids as endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factors. Circ Res. 1996; 78: 415423.
11. Fisslthaler B, Popp R, Kiss L, Potente M, Harder DR, Fleming I, Busse R. Cytochrome P450 2C is an EDHF synthase in coronary arteries. Nature. 1999; 401: 493497.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Alvarez J, Montero M, García-Sancho J. High affinity inhibition of Ca2+-dependent K+ channels by cytochrome P-450 inhibitors. J Biol Chem. 1992; 267: 1178911793.
13. Si H, Heyken WT, Wolfle SE, Tysiac M, Schubert R, Grgic I, Vilianovich L, Giebing G, Maier T, Gross V, Bader M, de Wit C, Hoyer J, Kohler R. Impaired endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor-mediated dilations and increased blood pressure in mice deficient of the intermediate-conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channel. Circ Res. 2006; 99: 537544.
14. Wei AD, Gutman GA, Aldrich R, Chandy KG, Grissmer S, Wulff H. International Union of Pharmacology. LII. Nomenclature and molecular relationships of calcium-activated potassium channels. Pharmacol Rev. 2005; 57: 463472.
15. Bolotina VM, Najibi S, Palacino JJ, Pagano PJ, Cohen RA. Nitric oxide directly activates calcium-dependent potassium channels in vascular smooth muscle. Nature. 1994; 368: 850853.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. McNeish AJ, Sandow SL, Neylon CB, Chen MX, Dora KA, Garland CJ. Evidence for involvement of both IKCa and SKCa channels in hyperpolarizing responses of the rat middle cerebral artery. Stroke. 2006; 37: 12771282.
17. Brandes RP, Schmitz-Winnenthal FH, Félétou M, Gödecke A, Huang PL, Vanhoutte PM, Fleming I, Busse R. An endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor distinct from NO and prostacyclin is a major endothelium-dependent vasodilator in resistance vessels of wild-type and endothelial NO synthase knockout mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000; 97: 97479752.
18. Scotland RS, Madhani M, Chauhan S, Moncada S, Andresen J, Nilsson H, Hobbs AJ, Ahluwalia A. Investigation of vascular responses in endothelial nitric oxide synthase/cyclooxygenase-1 double-knockout mice: key role for endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor in the regulation of blood pressure in vivo. Circulation. 2005; 111: 796803.
19. Taylor MS, Bonev AD, Gross TP, Eckman DM, Brayden JE, Bond CT, Adelman JP, Nelson MT. Altered expression of small-conductance Ca2+-activated K+ (SK3) channels modulates arterial tone and blood pressure. Circ Res. 2003; 93: 124.
Related Article:
Circ. Res. 2006 99: 537-544.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Sankaranarayanan, G. Raman, C. Busch, T. Schultz, P. I. Zimin, J. Hoyer, R. Kohler, and H. Wulff Naphtho[1,2-d]thiazol-2-ylamine (SKA-31), a New Activator of KCa2 and KCa3.1 Potassium Channels, Potentiates the Endothelium-Derived Hyperpolarizing Factor Response and Lowers Blood Pressure Mol. Pharmacol., February 1, 2009; 75(2): 281 - 295. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Research Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2006 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |