doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000165652.82726.d9
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.
Editorials |
Yin and Yang of MCP-1
From the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Correspondence to Lewis C. Becker, MD Halsted 500, Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21287 Phone: 410-955-5997. Fax: 410-955-0852. E-mail lbecker{at}mail.jhmi.edu
See related article, pages 881–889
Key Words: Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 • Ischemia • Myocardial infarction • Inflammation • Left ventricular remodeling • Matrix metalloproteinases
Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1, also known as CCL2) is a chemokine of the C-C type which recruits circulating monocytes to sites of inflammation. Over the past several years, MCP-1 has become established as a major factor in the development of atherosclerosis through its promotion of monocyte/macrophage accumulation in atherosclerotic plaques, leading in turn to chronic inflammation, smooth muscle cell proliferation, and plaque instability.1 Although not present in normal blood vessels, MCP-1 protein and mRNA are strongly expressed in areas of atherosclerosis.2,3 Knock out of the MCP-1 gene or the receptor for MCP-1, C-C chemokine receptor (CCR)-2, are associated with a decrease in the extent of atherosclerosis in murine models.4,5
MCP-1 is produced by endothelial cells, vascular smooth muscle cells, and macrophages in atherosclerotic plaques. Oxidized LDL in the arterial wall may upregulate the MCP-1 gene in vascular cells and stimulate the local adhesion of monocytes to endothelial cells.6 LDL-C has been shown to upregulate CCR-2 expression on monocytes, and monocyte CCR2 expression is dramatically increased in hypercholesterolemic patients compared with normal controls.7
There has been increasing interest in the role of MCP-1 in other inflammatory conditions, including post-ischemic inflammation. A study published in this issue of Circulation Research by Dewald et al demonstrates that MCP-1 plays an important role in the healing of necrotic areas of myocardium following coronary artery occlusion and reperfusion.8 Mice with disruption of the MCP-1 gene exhibited striking delays in the recruitment of macrophages into the healing infarct and in the replacement of injured myocytes by granulation tissue without any effect on neutrophil mobilization. MCP-1 null mice had decreased and delayed infiltration of macrophages, decreased expression of important cytokines, such as TNF
, IL-1ß, TGFß, and IL-10, decreased macrophage differentiation, and diminished myofibroblast acculmulation (without a change in angiogenesis) within the healing infarct.
These observations would suggest a beneficial role for MCP-1 in promoting infarct healing. The persistence of "mummified" myocytes and delay in formation of granulation tissue in MCP-1 null mice is reminiscent of the observations made 3 decades ago following the administration of high dose steroids in acute myocardial infarction. Patients treated with steroids had an increased incidence of myocardial rupture, leading to the abandoning of this potential therapy.9
Paradoxically, however, the study by Dewald et al found that MCP-1 null mice had less post-infarct left ventricular remodeling (less left ventricular dilatation and less impairment of left ventricular function) without a change in the size of the infarct, suggesting that MCP-1 somehow causes ventricular remodeling at the same time that it promotes infarct healing. This observation is unlikely to be a random error, since other approaches to inhibiting MCP-1, including over-expression of an N-terminal deletion mutant of the MCP-1 gene,10 or genetic deletion of the MCP-1 receptor CCR-2,11 have also resulted in less post-infarct left ventricular remodeling.
The biological pathways responsible for post-infarct ventricular remodeling are complex and not fully understood. Remodeling occurs more than several weeks following an acute myocardial infarction, and is dependent in large part on the size of the infarcted region. The larger the infarct, the more likely the infarct region is to thin and become aneurysmal over time, and the noninfarcted region to stretch (related to myocyte elongation and myofiber rearrangement or "slippage"), and become hypertrophied and fibrotic. Clinically, these processes result in ventricular dilatation, reduced ventricular function, and often, chronic heart failure.
Early reperfusion to salvage injured but viable myocytes and reduce the size of the infarcted region is an accepted approach for preventing post-infarct ventricular remodeling. The use of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors to reduce LV wall stress (although other effects of these inhibitors may also be important, such as their anti-inflammatory effects) is also standard anti-remodeling therapy. Studies in animal models utilizing granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) have suggested that ongoing apoptosis within the infarct and peri-infarct regions may contribute to ventricular remodeling, presumably by increasing the size of the infarcted region. G-CSF has been shown to limit remodeling by inducing anti-apoptotic proteins through activation of the Jak/Stat pathway.12 Probably equally important, G-CSF also appears to limit ventricular remodeling by promoting the expression of collagen in the infarcted area, perhaps through the upregulation of the "fibrotic cytokine" transforming growth factor-ß (TGF-ß).13 Rats with myocardial infarction treated with G-CSF had higher expression of TGF-ß mRNA in the infarcted area at 3 days post-infarct, along with earlier peaking and higher levels of procollagen type I and III mRNA, and more prominent collagen accumulation in the infarcted area at 7 days. Presumably, enhanced expression of collagen in the infarcted segment makes the extracellular matrix stronger and less prone to thinning and aneurysm formation.
However, as collagen is laid down in the infarcted area, it is also being degraded by matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), which in turn are regulated by tissue inhibitors of MMPs (TIMPs). Genetic deletion of TIMP-1 in a murine infarct model results in accelerated LV remodeling, which can be reversed by pharmacological inhibition of MMPs by PD-166793.14 MMPs therefore appear to be an important determinant of remodeling through their effect on collagen content in the infarct area.
Processes occurring in the noninfarcted area may also contribute to post-infarct remodeling. Sustained or recurrent elevations of cytokines, such as IL-1ß or TNF- in noninfarcted myocardium, away from the original site of injury, are associated with collagen deposition and interstitial fibrosis, which, is associated with ventricular remodeling.15 IL-1ß increases expression of MMPs-13, -2, and -9 in cultured cardiac fibroblasts, whereas TNF- increases expression of pro-MMP-3.16 Infusion of C-type natriuretic peptide in a rat infarct model produced a significant attenuation of ventricular remodeling which was attributed to its anti-fibrotic and anti-hypertrophic effects in the noninfarcted region.17 It therefore seems that fibrosis in the infarct area may be beneficial, whereas fibrosis in the noninfarct area may be harmful in terms of ventricular remodeling.
How does all of this relate to the apparently divergent effects of MCP-1 on infarct healing and ventricular remodeling reported by Dewald et al in this issue of Circulation Research? MCP-1 has important effects on monocytes/macrophages in addition to promoting and directing chemotaxis. In vitro, MCP-1 activates the respiratory burst of monocytes and induces the expression of the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6 and IL-1ß,18 which in turn may regulate the expression of TGF-ß. MCP-1 was shown to stimulate collagen expression via endogenous upregulation of TGF-ß19 and MMP expression in stimulated fibroblasts.20 Therefore, even while MCP-1 was promoting macrophage recruitment, myofibroblast differentiation, and replacement of necrotic myocytes with granulation tissue in the infarct, it may also have stimulated the expression of high levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines by these macrophages, resulting in the downstream expression of MMPs, with a net adverse effect on LV remodeling.
The challenge remaining is to translate these interesting findings on MCP-1 in murine infarct models to useful therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Ventricular remodeling, with resultant chronic heart failure, is a major clinical problem for which there are currently only incomplete solutions. MCP-1 is likely to have a major role in this process, but further information is needed about how exactly MCP-1 produces adverse ventricular remodeling to devise appropriately targeted therapies. Is the adverse effect actually mediated by MMPs, and if so, by which ones, produced by and acting on which cell types, by what pathways, over what time course? As pointed out by Dewald et al,8 based on their studies, MCP-1 inhibition might appear to represent an attractive approach to limiting post-infarct remodeling, but the results must be put into proper context. "It is possible that in patients with acute myocardial infarction, delayed phagocytosis of injured cardiomyocytes may increase the arrhythmogenic potential or predispose to mechanical complications, such as rupture, or ventricular aneurysm formation."8 Because murine models only rarely exhibit these complications, translational studies are needed in large mammalian models of infarction to understand the real therapeutic potential and safety of targeting MCP-1. Going after downstream targets of MCP-1, such as specific MMPs, or focusing on tissue MMP inhibitors (TIMPs), might in fact better achieve the therapeutic goals with fewer unwanted side effects.
 |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
The author is supported by Program Project Grant HL065608 and grants HL071025 and HL72518 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
|
Footnotes |
|---|
The opinions expressed in this editorial are not necessarily those of the editors or of the American Heart Association.
|
References |
|---|
 Top References |
|---|
1. Libby P. Changing concepts of atherosclerosis. J Intern Med. 2000; 247: 349–358.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Nelken NA, Coughlin SR, Gordon D, Wilcox JN. Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 in human atheromatous plaques. J Clin Invest. 1991; 88: 1121–1127.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Yla-Herttuala S, Lipton BA, Rosenfeld ME, Sarkioja T, Yoshimura T, Leonard EJ, Witztum JL, Steinberg D. Expression of monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 in macrophage-rich areas of human and rabbit atherosclerotic lesions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991; 88: 5252–5256.
4. Gu L, Okada Y, Clinton SK, Gerard C, Sukhova GK, Libby P, Rollins BJ. Absence of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 reduces atherosclerosis in low density lipoprotein receptor-deficient mice. Mol Cell. 1998; 2: 275–281.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Dawson TC, Kuziel WA, Osahar TA, Maeda N. Absence of CC chemokine receptor-2 reduces atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. Atherosclerosis. 1999; 143: 205–211.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Cushing SD, Berliner JA, Valente AJ, Territo MC, Navab M, Parhami F, Gerrity R, Schwartz CJ, Fogelman AM. Minimally modified low density lipoprotein induces monocyte chemotactic protein-1 in human endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990; 87: 5134–5138.
7. Han KH, Tangirala RK, Green SR, Quehenberger O. Chemokine receptor CCR2 expression and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1-mediated chemotaxis in human monocytes. A regulatory role for plasma LDL. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1998; 18: 1983–1991.
8. Dewald O, Zymek P, Winkelmann K, Koerting A, Ren G, Abou-Khamis T, Michael LH, Rollins BJ, Entman ML, Frangogiannis NG. CCL2/Monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1 regulates inflammatory responses critical to healing myocardial infarcts. Circ Res. 2005; 96: 881–889.
9. Roberts R, DeMello V, Sobel BE. Deleterious effects of methylprednisolone in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1976; 53: I204—I206.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Hayashidani S, Tsutsui H, Shiomi T, Ikeuchi M, Matsusaka H, Suematsu N, Wen J, Egashira K, Takeshita A. Anti-monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 gene therapy attenuates left ventricular remodeling and failure after experimental myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2003; 108: 2134–2140.
11. Kaikita K, Hayasaki T, Okuma T, Kuziel WA, Ogawa H, Takeya M. Targeted deletion of CC chemokine receptor 2 attenuates left ventricular remodeling after experimental myocardial infarction. Am J Pathol. 2004; 165: 439–447.
12. Harada M, Qin Y, Takano H, Minamino T, Zou Y, Toko H, Ohtsuka M, Matsuura K, Sano M, Nishi J, Iwanaga K, Akazawa H, Kunieda T, Zhu W, Hasegawa H, Kunisada K, Nagai T, Nakaya H, Yamauchi-Takihara K, Komuro I. G-CSF prevents cardiac remodeling after myocardial infarction by activating the Jak-Stat pathway in cardiomyocytes. Nature Medicine. 2005; 11: 305–311.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Sugano Y, Anzai T, Yoshikawa T, Maekawa Y, Kohno T, Mahara K, Naito K, Ogawa S. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor attenuates early ventricular expansion after experimental myocardial infarction. Cardiovasc Res. 2005; 65: 446–456.
14. Ikonomidis JS, Hendrick JW, Parkhurst AM, Herron AR, Escobar PG, Dowdy KB, Stroud RE, Hapke E, Zile MR, Spinale FG. Accelerated LV remodeling after myocardial infarction in TIMP-1-deficient mice: effects of exogenous MMP inhibition. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2005; 288: H149–H158.
15. Nian M, Lee P, Khaper N, Liu P. Inflammatory cytokines and postmyocardial infarction remodeling. Circulation Res. 2004; 94: 1543–1553.
16. Siwik DA, Chang DL, Colucci WS. Interleukin-1 beta and tumor necrosis factor-alpha decrease collagen synthesis and increase matrix metalloproteinase activity in cardiac fibroblasts in vitro. Circulation Res. 2000; 86: 1259–1265.
17. Soeki T, Kishimoto I, Okumura H, Tokudome T, Horio T, Mori K, Kangawa K. C-type natriuretic peptide, a novel antifibrotic and antihypertrophic agent, prevents cardiac remodeling after myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; 456: 608–616.
18. Jiang Y, Beller DI, Frendl G, Graves DT. Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 regulates adhesion molecule expression and cytokine production in human monocytes. J Immunol. 1992; 148: 2423–2428.[Abstract]
19. Gharaee-Kermani M, Denholm EM, Phan SH. Costimulation of fibroblast collagen and transforming growth factor beta1 gene expression by monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 via specific receptors. J Biol Chem. 1996; 271: 17779–17784.
20. Yamamoto T, Eckes B, Mauch C, Hartmann K, Krieg T. Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 enhances gene expression and synthesis of matrix metalloproteinase-1 in human fibroblasts by an autocrine IL-1 alpha loop. J Immunol. 2000; 164: 6174–6179.
Related Article:
Circ. Res. 2005 96: 881-889.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  J. Niu, A. Azfer, and P. E. Kolattukudy Monocyte-specific Bcl-2 expression attenuates inflammation and heart failure in monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1)-induced cardiomyopathy Cardiovasc Res, July 1, 2006; 71(1): 139 - 148. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. Zhou, A. Azfer, J. Niu, S. Graham, M. Choudhury, F. M. Adamski, C. Younce, P. F. Binkley, and P. E. Kolattukudy Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1 Induces a Novel Transcription Factor That Causes Cardiac Myocyte Apoptosis and Ventricular Dysfunction Circ. Res., May 12, 2006; 98(9): 1177 - 1185. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||