| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cellular Biology |
From the Department of Surgery (S.P., J.-H.Y., J.M.M.-M., Z.A.K., S.L., J.B.), Vascular Biology Program, Childrens Hospital Boston and Harvard Medical School; and Department of Pathology (E.A., F.J.S.), Brigham and Womens Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass. Current address for S.P.: Division of Rheumatology, Immunology, and Allergy, Brigham and Womens Hospital, Boston, Mass. Current address for E.A.: Center for Molecular Imaging Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown. Current address for S.L.: Institute for Child Health and Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, University College London, UK.
Correspondence to Joyce Bischoff, PhD, Childrens Hospital Boston, 300 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA 02115. E-mail joyce.bischoff{at}childrens.harvard.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: cell culture endothelial cell differentiation endothelial cells heart valves progenitor cells transdifferentiation vascular endothelial growth factor vascular endothelium
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
During embryonic valve development, a subset of endocardial endothelial cells, driven by signals from the underlying myocardium, change their phenotype to mesenchymal cells and migrate into the cardiac jelly to form endocardial cushions, the primordial of valves and cardiac septa of the adult heart.2 This transdifferentiation of endocardial cells to mesenchymal cells and migration away from the endothelial layer is termed endothelial-mesenchymal transformation (EMT). Studies from Markwald and coworkers show that during EMT, the activated endothelial cells lose cell-cell contacts, gain mesenchymal markers such as
-smooth muscle actin (
-SMA), reduce expression of endothelial markers, and migrate into the cardiac jelly.3,4
TGFß superfamily members are well-studied signaling intermediates in endocardial cushion formation, with TGFß1 to 3 isoforms expressed at or near the onset of EMT during chick and mouse cardiogenesis.46 Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is also expressed, by embryonic day 9.5, in the endothelial cells in the outflow tract and atrioventricular canal that undergo EMT.7 Alterations in VEGF levels appear to have pronounced effects on the endocardial cushions depending on the timing, level, and location during heart development.811 Following these embryonic events, Aikawa and colleagues demonstrated that human fetal valves possess a dynamic structure composed of proliferating cells, a nascent extracellular matrix (ECM) and
-SMApositive cells.12 Hence, dynamic changes in cell phenotype, cell proliferation and apoptosis, and ECM remodeling occur after the endocardial cushions have remodeled into leaflets and continue throughout human fetal and postnatal development.
Vascular progenitor cells derived from murine embryonic stem cells can differentiate into either endothelial or smooth muscle cells when treated with VEGF or platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-BB, respectively.13 More recently, vascular progenitors have been isolated from arteries of adult mice.14 That valve progenitors exist and contribute to cell regeneration or repair in adult valves has been speculated on15; however, only recently has experimental evidence for valve progenitors been reported.16,17 Indeed, bone marrow transplantation experiments in mice have shown that clonal hematopoietic stem cells engrafted into the aortic, pulmonary, and atrioventricular valves can differentiate into fibroblast-like cells.18 In the course of our studies on the endothelium of postnatal valves, we identified clonal populations from human pulmonary valve leaflets with progenitor-like properties, demonstrated by their ability to differentiate into endothelial cells in response to VEGF or into myofibroblasts/smooth muscle cells (SMCs), reminiscent of valve interstitial cells, in response to TGFß2.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Isolation and Culture of Clonal Population of Human Pulmonary Valve Endothelial Cells
Human pulmonary valve endothelial cells (HPVECs) were isolated from a pulmonary valve of a 9-month-old infant as described19 and cultured on 1% gelatin-coated plates in EBM-2 supplemented with EGM-2 SingleQuots (Cambrex Bio Science, Walkersville, Md [except the hydrocortisone aliquot was omitted]), and 20% heat-inactivated FBS. This culture media will be referred to as EBM-2. Clonal populations were isolated from HPVECs at passage 2 by suspending in growth medium at 3.3 cells/mL and plating 100 µL/well of a 96-well plate. When the colonies covered two-thirds of the well, cells were passaged into 24-well dishes. Human dermal microvascular ECs (HDMECs) were isolated as reported20 but cultured in the same medium, EBM-2, as the HPVECs and HPVEC-derived clones.
An expanded Materials and Methods section, available at http://circres.ahajournals.org, describes materials and methods for indirect immunofluorescence, RT-PCR, Western blot analysis, flow cytometry, cellular migration and invasion assays, and the HL-60 cell adhesion assay.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-SMA exist in aortic valve leaflets in juvenile sheep.15 To gain insights on the nature of these cells, we quantitated CD31/
-SMApositive cells in paraffin-embedded sections from human fetal and adult semilunar valve leaflets. Three subsets of cells were observed along the leaflet endothelium: cells expressing only CD31 (green), only
-SMA (red), and those coexpressing both CD31 and
-SMA (yellow) (Figure 1A). In fetal valves, some CD31-positive cells were seen in the interstitium of the leaflet. The CD31 expression might correspond to residual endothelial characteristics of the interstitial cells, similar to endothelial-specific green fluorescence protein (GFP) expression seen in embryonic valve leaflets.21
-SMApositive cells were observed predominantly along the subendothelial lining. In fetal valves, 5% to 10% of the CD31-positive cells were also
-SMA positive, whereas only 1% double-positive cells were detected in adult valves (Figure 1B). The presence of dual CD31/
-SMApositive cells suggests that a subset of valve endothelial cells have the potential to differentiate toward a mesenchymal phenotype and perhaps migrate into the interstitial regions of the leaflet.
|
Isolation and Characterization of HPVEC Clones
To gain insight into the EMT potential of the CD31-positive and CD31/
-SMApositive cells in human cardiac valves, we used a limiting dilution technique to isolate clonal populations. We isolated 5 clones, of which 4 exhibited features of a mesenchymal phenotype and yet expressed endothelial markers. These clones showed slower growth kinetics and exhibited spindle-shaped morphology instead of the cobblestone morphology seen in parental HPVECs or HDMECs (Figure 2A). Of the clones obtained, clone 5 and clone 8 were chosen for further characterization of markers specific to endothelial and mesenchymal lineages by 3 different techniques: RT-PCR (Figure 2B), indirect immunofluorescence (Figure 2C), and flow cytometry (Figure 2D). Both clones expressed the endothelial markers tested: CD31, VE-cadherin, von Willebrand factor (vWF), VEGF-R2, endothelial NO synthase (eNOS), CD34, CD146, and CD105 as determined by PCR and by flow cytometry (Figure 2D). HDMECs served as a positive control, whereas parental HPVECs and human saphenous vein smooth muscle cells (HSVSMCs) were analyzed for comparison. Clones 5 and 8 also expressed TGFß receptors I, II, and III (Figure 2B). Immunofluorescence staining of clone 8 and clone 5 showed cell/cell border staining for CD31 and VE-cadherin, a punctate cytoplasmic staining for vWF, consistent with its localization in WeibelPalade bodies, but little
-SMA (Figure 2C). The flow cytometry analysis showed a similar pattern among HPVECs, clone 8, clone 5, and HDMECs and a clear distinction from HSVSMCs. The clones were negative for mesenchymal marker CD90 (Figure 2D). Based on the expression patterns, clone 8 and clone 5 appeared to be endothelial cells despite lacking a typical cobblestone appearance.
|
TGFß2 Induces Expression Smooth Muscle Markers in HPVEC Clones
TGFß isoforms are well documented in the differentiation of endothelial to mesenchymal cells in mouse and chick endocardial cushion formation.4,6,15,19,22,23 However, whether TGFß isoforms induce EMT in human valve endothelial cells is unknown. We tested whether the clonal populations from HPVECs can be induced to undergo EMT in response to TGFß1, -ß2, or -ß3. Clonal cells are essential for this experiment to ensure that effects are not attributable to preferential growth of mesenchymal cells that could contaminate a nonclonal endothelial cell culture. We treated the cells with TGFß1,2, or 3 for 10 days and examined the changes in the expression of smooth muscle cell/mesenchymal markers
-SMA and calponin (Figure 3A). TGFß2, but not TGFß1 or TGFß3 isoforms, induced robust expression of
-SMA and calponin in clone 8. Induction was also evident in clone 5 and in the parental HPVECs, but to a lesser extent because the cells expressed
-SMA in the absence of TGFß2. Increased expression of
-SMA and calponin was confirmed by RT-PCR (data not shown). HDMECs did not express
-SMA or calponin in either the absence or presence of TGFß2. Consistently, TGFß2 treatment attenuated CD31 expression in clone 8 and clone 5. In Figure 3B, clone 8 and clone 5 treated without or with TGFß2 for 10 days were analyzed for coexpression of CD31 and
-SMA by double-label immunofluorescence. The presence of both CD31 and
-SMA in individual cells supports the finding that the cells are undergoing EMT. The increase in
-SMA expressing (red) CD31-positive cells in response to TGFß2, quantitated by counting fluorescent cells, was significant.
|
TGFß2 Treatment Results in Upregulation of EMT-Related Transcripts
Slug and its homolog Snail are zinc finger transcription factors that mediate both epithelial and endothelial transdifferentiation.24 Slug expression in developing valves is TGFß2 dependent,25 and downregulating Slug with antisense oligonucleotides inhibited EMT in chick endocardial cushion explants.26 Therefore, we investigated if these markers were upregulated when clone 5 and clone 8 cells were induced to undergo EMT (Figure 4A). TGFß2 induced expression of Slug and caused a modest enhancement of Snail. The expression of other known EMT-related proteins, hHex, bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)-2, or Jagged-1, was unaltered by TGFß2 (data not shown). Enhanced migration is another hallmark of EMT and crucial players involved in this process belong to the family of matrix metalloproteases (MMPs).6 TGFß2 significantly enhanced the expression of MMP-1 and MMP-2 in HPVEC clones as assessed by RT-PCR (Figure 4A). To measure cellular migration directly, different factors were tested for ability to stimulate migration of clone 8 (Figure 4B). Increased migration in response to serum, PDGF, and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) was observed in cells treated with TGFß2 compared with untreated control cells. We also measured the ability of clone 8 to invade a collagen gel. TGFß2-treated or untreated clone 8 cells were compared with HDMECs treated with or without TGFß2. In this assay, TGFß2-treated cells were more invasive compared with the control cells, with TGFß2-treated clone 8 cells showing the most robust invasion (Figure 4D). In addition, clone 5 and clone 8 exhibited 4- to 5-fold higher levels of basal migration compared with the HDMECs (Figure 4C). As enhanced basal migration is a hallmark of endothelial progenitor cells,27 the increased migratory activity of clone 5 and clone 8 is consistent with a progenitor phenotype.
|
HPVEC Clones Exhibit Endothelial/Mesenchymal Plasticity
We also examined the effects of adding additional VEGF-A (10 ng/mL) on differentiation of these clones. (EBM-2 supplemented with EGM-2 SingleQuots contains 2 to 5 ng/mL VEGF-A.) The additional VEGF caused the cell clusters to form a confluent cobblestone-like monolayer (Figure 5A), with CD31 localized at cell/cell borders (Figure 5B). To determined if this effect was specific to VEGF or a general response to growth factors, cells were treated with EBM-2 media without the added growth factors from SingleQuots (-GF), with -GF media to which bFGF, EGF, PDGF, or VEGF had been added, and with full EBM-2 growth medium with SingleQuots. In media without growth factors, both CD31 and
-SMA were expressed; the levels were not significantly altered by addition of bFGF or EGF. PDGF treatment led to reduction in CD31 and
-SMA expression. In contrast, cells treated with 10 ng/mL VEGF or with complete EBM-2 medium showed enhanced CD31 expression and reduced
-SMA expression (Figure 5C), suggesting that VEGF drives these cells to stronger endothelial phenotype. Taken together, the results demonstrate that these cells have a dual potential to differentiate to an endothelial phenotype with VEGF or a mesenchymal phenotype with TGFß2 (Figures 4 and 5
A). The fact that the clones were expanded from a single cell, coupled with the above findings, suggests that these clones are bipotential progenitors that reside in the pulmonary valve leaflets.
|
TGFß2 Abrogates the Functional Endothelial Properties of the HPVEC Clones
We then asked whether these clones have the potential to function as normal endothelial, and, if so, what effect does TGFß2 have. Tube formation in Matrigel is a characteristic feature of endothelial cells. Therefore, we investigated the tube-forming ability of these cells in presence or absence of TGFß2 (Figure 5D). Untreated clone 8 cells formed tube-like structures with translucent slits along the length of the cords, indicating lumen formation. However, prior treatment with TGFß2 inhibited tube formation of clone 8 and, instead, caused the cells to contract into a large clump that appeared similar to untreated HSVSMCs. HDMECs treated with TGFß2 were able to form tubes (data not shown), as were the nontreated HDMECs (Figure 5D).
A second functional property of endothelial cells is expression of adhesion molecules E-selectin, intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1, and vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM)-1 in response to tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-
. Therefore, HPVEC clones cultured in either VEGF or TGFß2 were exposed to TNF-
for 5 hours. Both clones as well as HDMECs showed TNF-
induced expression of E-selectin, VCAM-1, and ICAM-1. Prior treatment with TGFß2 greatly attenuated the TNF-
induced expression of the adhesion molecules in clone 8 and clone 5 but had no effect on the induction level in HDMECs (Figure 6A). Complementing these findings, a leukocyte adhesion assay revealed strong adhesion of HL-60 cells, a human promyelocytic leukemia line, to both clone 8 and clone 5 when stimulated with TNF-
for 5 hours. However, prior treatment with TGFß2 inhibited binding of HL-60 cells to clone 8 but not to HDMECs (Figure 6B). Treatment with VEGF before TNF-
induction led to modest increase in this adhesion response consistent with results in Figure 6A. These data demonstrate that TGFß2 treatment abrogates endothelial functional properties specifically in HPVEC-derived clones but not in HDMECs.
|
Reversibility of Endothelial and Mesenchymal Phenotypes
The above results prompted us to investigate if the changes we observed with TGFß2 and VEGF are transient or whether differentiation status is maintained after removal of the factors. We treated clonal cells with TGFß2 or VEGF for 10 days, trypsinized and reseeded the cells in presence of TGFß2 and VEGF according to the scheme in Figure 7A. Lanes 1 to 3 show that the cells differentiated as expected based on our previous results. When cells were first induced to a mesenchymal phenotype with TGFß2, we found that removing TGFß2 reversed the phenotype (compare lanes 4 and 5). The presence of additional VEGF did not result in any further decrease in
-SMA (compare lane 4 and lane 6). After TGFß2 treatment, a 10 day treatment with VEGF did not fully restore the endothelial phenotype (compare lanes 3 and 6). When cells were first cultured in VEGF for 10 days, subsequent exposure to TGFß2 resulted in a full reversal (compare lane 8 to lanes 2 or 5). These results suggest that (1) VEGF is required for the cells to maintain an endothelial phenotype; (2) TGFß2-induced
-SMA can be partially reversed; and (3) prior treatment with TGFß2 or VEGF does not diminish the plasticity of the cells (Figure 7B). Similar results were obtained with both clone 5 and clone 8. The reversibility may be influenced by the ECM such that removal of the cells from the ECM produced in response to TGFß2 might exert control over the cellular phenotype. To address the role of ECM, we examined the effect of plating the cells on different ECM to determine whether exogenous ECM might alter EMT. As seen in Figure 7C, cells plated on fibronectin showed markedly enhanced TGFß2 induction of
-SMA, consistent with the potential role for fibronectin in EMT in endocardial cushions.6
|
A Hierarchy of Endothelial/Mesenchymal Plasticity Among HPVEC Clonal Populations
To further understand the role of VEGF in the endothelial to mesenchymal differentiation, we analyzed 3 different clones, clones 1, 8, and 5, that varied in their potential to undergo EMT (Figure 8A). Clone 1 cells did not express
-SMA or calponin in response to TGFß2, suggesting that this clone is unable to undergo EMT. However, addition of VEGF resulted in increased CD31 and VE-cadherin protein levels (Figure 8A); coincubation with TGFß2 had no effect on VEGF-enhanced expression of these endothelial markers. Clone 8 responded to both TGFß2 and VEGF; TGFß2 induced expression of
-SMA and calponin and a decrease in CD31, whereas VEGF increased CD31 and VE-cadherin. Strikingly, VEGF reduced the TGFß2 induction of
-SMA and calponin in clone 8. Clone 5, on the other hand, showed spontaneous transdifferentiation as seen by the coexpression of CD31 and
-SMA under control conditions (Figure 8A, and 3B). TGFß2 caused increased
-SMA and calponin and decreased CD31 as expected. However, VEGF was unable to block the effects of TGFß2 on
-SMA and calponin. This suggests that clone 5 is further differentiated toward a mesenchymal phenotype than clone 8. The band intensities for CD31 and
-SMA for each clone in each condition from 2 separate experiments were quantitated by densitometry to substantiate the results (Figure 8B). In summary, these results support the concept that a hierarchy exists among these clonal cell populations in their propensity to transition from an endothelial to mesenchymal phenotype in response to VEGF or TGFß2 (Figure 8C).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-SMApositive cells seen by in situ immunostaining of human pulmonary valve leaflets. Whether the reversibility of the endothelial and mesenchymal phenotypes seen in vitro occurs in vivo will require further investigation. Finally, the differentiation potential seems to be restricted as clones failed to differentiate into adipocytes, chondrocytes osteocytes, or hematopoietic progenitors in in vitro assays (data not shown).
We isolated valvular progenitor cells from discarded, surgically resected pulmonary valve tissue from 3 different patients. Two were infants, ages 5 months and 9 months, and the third was a 15-year old. The number of single cells that grew into clonal populations was approximately 30%, but the number of bipotential clones ranged from 1% from the 15-year old to 3% to 4% from the infant specimens. This corresponds well to our in vivo data showing that cells expressing both CD31 and
-SMA are found in higher numbers in fetal specimens compared with the adult valves (Figure 1). Although the valve progenitor cells are different from normal human microvascular ECs, such as HDMECs, they express endothelial markers and behave as functional endothelial cells in 2 in vitro assays. The endothelial properties we detected in the clones could be explained by that fact that they were expanded in a medium designed for growth of human endothelial cells, EBM-2, which contains 2 to 5 ng/mL VEGF. This level of VEGF was not sufficient to block the action of TGFß2 in clones 5 and 8 but may have been in clone 1.
HDMECs were not responsive to TGFb1,2, or 3, suggesting that postnatal EMT is specific to valve endothelium and perhaps to a subset of valve EC with progenitor properties. However, TGFß-induced differentiation of large vessel-derived EC into SMC-like cells has been reported, suggesting that EMT may not be unique to the valve endothelium and that vascular progenitors may reside in the vessel wall. In 1992, bovine aortic ECs were shown to express
-SMA, with a concomitant decrease in EC markers, in response to TGFß1.29 DeRuiter et al traced EC in the embryonic dorsal aorta that migrated into the subendothelial space and expressed
-SMA, indicating EMT in embryonic endothelium.30 A small percentage of cells in EC preparations from bovine arteries were also shown to undergo EMT.31 More recently, clonal populations of human umbilical vein ECs were shown to differentiate into SMC-like cells when FGF-1 was removed.32 Hence, although the valve endothelium appears to harbor endothelial cells that can be easily prompted to undergo EMT, endothelial cells with capacity to undergo EMT may reside throughout the vasculature and perhaps through embryonic, fetal, childhood, and adult life.
How closely the EMT we observe in valve EC progenitors in vitro reflects the EMT that occurs in vivo, either during valve development or during postnatal life, is a critical question. Many of the hallmarks of EMT are seen in our in vitro system: loss of cell/cell contacts in the EC monolayer; increased expression of
-SMA, MMP-1, MMP-2, and Slug; increased cellular migration and invasion; and induction of Sox9 (J.H.Y. and J.B., 2006 unpublished results). The specificity of TGFß2 for inducing these events is also consistent with in vivo studies of EMT in mouse endocardial cushions.28
-SMA is expressed transiently during EMT in developing valves and during steps of endothelial delamination and migration4 but is found only in focal regions along the endothelium in healthy postnatal valves.12,15 Therefore, we postulate that the
-SMApositive valve progenitors are recapitulating early events in EMT. Identification of specific markers of the interstitial cells of heart valves would provide important tools for studying the entire differentiation process.
HPVEC clones also exhibit a hierarchy in which some clones are more endothelial like, whereas others are more mesenchymal-like in terms of response to exogenous factors. We hypothesize that these cells are valve progenitors that participate in cellular renewal of the valve endothelium and the interstitial cells of the leaflet. Differentiation toward one cell type or the other would depend on exposure to biochemical and mechanical signals and possibly even to pathological signals arising from disease or structural malformations. Alterations in valve progenitor cell proliferation or differentiation may occur in any number of deleterious conditions leading to calcification, leaflet thickening, or even loss of integrity. Understanding the functional characteristics of these cells may lead to greater understanding of heart valve disease and eventually to strategies to manipulate these cells for therapeutic benefit.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Sources of Funding
This work was supported by NIH grant R01 HL 06490 (to J.B.) and a Bogue Research Fellowship, University College London (to S.L.).
Disclosures
None.
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Chaput, M. D. Handschumacher, F. Tournoux, L. Hua, J. L. Guerrero, G. J. Vlahakes, and R. A. Levine Mitral Leaflet Adaptation to Ventricular Remodeling: Occurrence and Adequacy in Patients With Functional Mitral Regurgitation Circulation, August 19, 2008; 118(8): 845 - 852. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. C. Liu, V. R. Joag, and A. I. Gotlieb The Emerging Role of Valve Interstitial Cell Phenotypes in Regulating Heart Valve Pathobiology Am. J. Pathol., November 1, 2007; 171(5): 1407 - 1418. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. L. Sales, G. C. Engelmayr Jr, J. A. Johnson Jr, J. Gao, Y. Wang, M. S. Sacks, and J. E. Mayer Jr Protein Precoating of Elastomeric Tissue-Engineering Scaffolds Increased Cellularity, Enhanced Extracellular Matrix Protein Production, and Differentially Regulated the Phenotypes of Circulating Endothelial Progenitor Cells Circulation, September 11, 2007; 116(11_suppl): I-55 - I-63. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Yana, H. Sagara, S. Takaki, K. Takatsu, K. Nakamura, K. Nakao, M. Katsuki, S.-i. Taniguchi, T. Aoki, H. Sato, et al. Crosstalk between neovessels and mural cells directs the site-specific expression of MT1-MMP to endothelial tip cells J. Cell Sci., May 1, 2007; 120(9): 1607 - 1614. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Research Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2006 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |