Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation Research
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation Research. 2006;99:501-509
Published online before print July 27, 2006, doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000238388.79295.4c
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
99/5/501    most recent
01.RES.0000238388.79295.4cv1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yagi, J.
Right arrow Articles by McCleskey, E. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yagi, J.
Right arrow Articles by McCleskey, E. W.
Related Collections
Right arrow Ischemic biology - basic studies
Right arrow Ion channels/membrane transport
Right arrow Autonomic, reflex, and neurohumoral control of circulation
Right arrowRelated Article
(Circulation Research. 2006;99:501.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.


Cellular Biology

Sustained Currents Through ASIC3 Ion Channels at the Modest pH Changes That Occur During Myocardial Ischemia

Junichi Yagi, Heather N. Wenk, Ligia A. Naves, Edwin W. McCleskey

From the Vollum Institute (J.Y., H.N.W., L.A.N., E.W.M.), Oregon Health & Sciences University, Portland; Department of Integrative Physiology (J.Y.), Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; and Department of Physiology and Biophysics (L.A.N.), Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.

Correspondence to Edwin W. McCleskey, PhD, Vollum Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR 97201-3098. E-mail mccleske{at}ohsu.edu


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Acid-sensing ion channel 3 (ASIC3) is highly expressed on sensory neurons that innervate heart and skeletal muscle and, therefore, is proposed to detect lactic acidosis and to transduce angina and muscle ischemic pain. A difficulty with this idea is that ASIC3 rapidly desensitizes. How can a desensitizing ion channel mediate a persisting sensation such as angina? Here, we show that rat ASIC3 produces a sustained current within the limited range of extracellular pH (7.3 to 6.7) that occurs during cardiac and skeletal muscle ischemia; experiments use patch clamp on transfected cell lines and on fluorescently tagged sensory neurons that innervate rat heart. No such sustained current occurs with ASIC1a (either as homomers or 1a/3 heteromers), whereas ASIC2a/3 heteromers give much larger currents than ASIC3 homomers. The sustained current persists even over tens of minutes because it is caused by a region of pH where there is overlap between inactivation and activation of the channel. Lactate, an anaerobic metabolite, allows the current to activate at slightly more basic pH. Surprisingly, amiloride, which blocks ASICs when they are activated at lower pH, increases ASIC3 current evoked at pH 7.0. Cardiac sensory neurons exhibit a small, perfectly sustained current when pH changes from 7.4 to 7.0. At least some of this current is carried by ASICs because the current is increased by both Zn2+, an ASIC modulator, and amiloride. We suggest that this sustained mode is the most relevant form of ASIC3 gating for triggering angina and other ischemic pain.


Key Words: angina • intermittent claudication • acid-sensing ion channels • lactic acidosis


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Ischemic pain occurs when heart, muscle, bone, or some visceral organs get insufficient oxygen for their needs. Clinical examples include the pain of angina, intermittent claudication, sickle cell anemia, and McArdle’s disease. Such pain is caused by compounds released from metabolically stressed tissue that then excite nearby sensory nerve endings.1 Lactic acid is among a number of candidate compounds for triggering ischemic pain.2–5 ASIC3 is considered a possible sensor for lactic acidosis created by anaerobic metabolism because it is present almost exclusively in sensory neurons6–8 and expresses at extremely high levels on nociceptive (pain-sensing) sensory neurons that innervate rat cardiac and skeletal muscle.9–11

ASIC3 has 2 useful properties for sensing lactic acidosis. First, it is essentially 4 times as sensitive as a pH meter10 in the narrow range of extracellular pH (7.3 to 6.7) that occurs during cardiac and skeletal muscle ischemia.12,13 Second, it is more sensitive to lactic acid than to other forms of acid.14 However, a reason to question the hypothesis that ASIC3 is a sensor for ischemic pain is that ASIC3 rapidly desensitizes, whereas ischemic pain is persistent. ASIC3 and ASIC3/2 heteromers do generate sustained currents at pH 5 and below,15 but such extreme acidity does not occur during ischemic muscle activity (although it may during inflammation or tissue damage).

Here, we visit this issue with patch-clamp recordings during which we apply acid stimuli that are long lived and slowly progressing, meant to mimic acidosis that might occur during myocardial ischemia. We find that ASIC3 transfected into mammalian cell lines generates a perfectly persistent current at the modest extracellular pH changes typical of muscle ischemia. We characterize the kinetics and pharmacology of the current and demonstrate a pharmacologically similar current on somas of sensory neurons that innervate rat heart. The finding adds to the evidence supporting the role of ASIC3 in detecting ischemic pain in cardiac and skeletal muscle.


*    Materials and Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Materials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Transfection and Cell Line Culture
ASIC clones (cDNA for ASIC1a, 2a, 2b and 3 in pcDNA3; 5 to 7 µg/200 µL; kindly provided by R. Waldmann and M. Lazdunski) and CD4 receptor cDNA in pcDNA3 (0.5 µg/200 µL; Invitrogen) were transfected into a line of CHO cells by electroporation (380V, 71 µF; Bio-Rad Genepulser II). Cells were cultured (5% CO2, 37°C) in DMEM/F12 media with 10% heat-inactivated FCS (GIBCO) and 1% Pen/Strep (GIBCO). Transfected cells were identified with CD4-coated microbeads (Dynal no. 111.05). Electrophysiological measurements were performed 16 to 36 hours after transfection.

Labeling and Culture of Cardiac Dorsal Root Ganglia Neurons
Cardiac sensory neurons in rats were fluorescently labeled in vivo as previously described.9 Briefly, a left thoracotomy was performed and 25 µL of a suspension of 20 mg/mL 1,1'-dioctadecyl-3,3',3'-tetramethyl indocarbocyanine perchlorate (DiI) (Molecular Probes) was injected into the pericardial space of Sprague-Dawley rats (8 to 9 weeks old) anesthetized with 1 mL/kg rat anesthetic (in mg/mL: ketamine 55, xylazine 5.5, and acepromazine 1.1). Details of the surgery are provided in a PowerPoint file in the online data supplement, available at http://circres.ahajournals.org, or on request. Three to 5 weeks after the DiI injection, the rats were euthanized and the right and left dorsal root ganglia (DRG) from segments C8-T3 were isolated. The ganglia were dissociated in papain and collagenase/dispase solutions, successively.16 After trituration, the dissociated cells were placed on polylysine- and laminin-coated plastic in DMEM/F12 medium plus nerve growth factor (50 ng/mL) at 37°C in 5% CO2. After 4 to 6 hours, the medium was changed to L15 plus nerve growth factor, and the cells were maintained at room temperature in air. Cardiac DRG neurons were identified by fluorescence microscopy. All recordings were within 2 days of the dissection. The animals were cared for in accordance with the guidelines of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Oregon Health Sciences University.

Electrophysiology
Whole-cell patch-clamp experiments were performed on CHO cells and rat DRG neurons using an Axopatch-1C patch-clamp amplifier and PClamp 8 software (Axon Instruments). Current and voltage recordings were filtered (Bessel) at 1 to 2 kHz and 5 kHz, respectively, and digitized at 5 to 10 kHz (Digidata 1322A, Axon Instruments). Micropipettes were pulled from borosilicate glass (no. 7052; Garner Glass, Claremont, Calif) and lightly fire-polished to 1 to 4 M{Omega} resistance using a microforge (MF-83, Narishige). Voltage-clamp recordings were made at –70 mV unless otherwise stated. The series resistance was usually less than 8 M{Omega} and was compensated 70% to 90% by the Axopatch circuit. No data were included in the analysis if series resistance resulted in 12 mV (&10% of the driving force) or greater error when the holding potential was –70 mV.

The standard internal solution contained (in mmol/L) 30 KCl, 110 KOH, 4 NaCl, 10 MOPS, 10 EGTA, 5 MgCl2, 2 Na2ATP, and 0.3 Na3GTP, adjusted to pH 7.0 with methanesulphonic acid. The standard external solution contained (in mmol/L) 140 NaCl, 5 KCl, 7 N-methyl-D-glucamine (NMDG), 5 HEPES, 5 MES, 2 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, and 10 glucose, with the pH adjusted with HCl or, for pH 8 solution, NaOH. The usual control pH of the extracellular solution was 7.4. For Na/K permeability experiments, NMDG-Cl replaced NaCl. For lactate modulation experiments, lactic acid (sodium salt, Sigma) replaced NaCl. For the amiloride modulation experiments, amiloride-HCl was added before pH adjustment. Solutions were applied through an array of 10 pipets (10 µL) under 40 cm of water pressure. Solution exchanges were accomplished within 20 ms by using a computer-driven solenoid valve system. Recordings were performed at room temperature. The liquid junction potential between the internal and external solutions was –5 mV, measured in current clamp and is corrected in all data.

Activation and inactivation curves were fit by nonlinear least squares (Origin, MicroCal Software) with the Hill equation: fraction={1+(K0.5/[H+]n)}–1, where K0.5 is the proton concentration that causes half the channels to open. The ratio of permeability coefficient of Na+ and K+ (PNa/PK) was calculated from reversal potentials using the Goldman-Hodgkin-Katz equation: PNa/PK=–{[K+]o–[K+]iexp(EF/RT)}/{[Na+]o–[Na+]iexp(EF/RT)}, where PNa and PK represent the permeability coefficients of Na+ and K+, respectively, E is the reversal potential, F is the Faraday constant, R is the universal gas constant, and T is the absolute temperature. Data are expressed as mean±SE.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Small pH Changes Evoke Sustained Na+ Current in ASIC3
ASIC3 is well known to generate sustained current at very acidic pH.6,15 This current (arrowhead, Figure 1Aa) is similar in magnitude to a sustained current that occurs at pH 7.0 (arrowhead, Figure 1Ab), which is the subject of this study. A useful protocol for studying the current attempts to mimic the mild, slow acidification that accompanies muscle ischemia: pH is dropped from 7.4 to 6.7 in steps of 0.1 U, with each step held for 20 seconds (Figure 1Ac). In CHO cells transfected with ASIC3 DNA, the protocol generates currents that show a transient followed by sustained currents that are largest at pH 7.0 (Figure 1Ac2); no such current exists in nontransfected cells (Figure 1Ac1). Figure 1B shows that this sustained current persists undiminished throughout a 20-minute stimulus to pH 7.0. Note also the clear increase in current noise that occurs at pH 7.0.


Figure 1
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Small pH changes evoke sustained current through ASIC3. A, Arrowheads mark small, sustained currents in an ASIC3-transfected CHO cell evoked by a rapid change from pH 7.4 to pH 5.0 (a) and to pH 7.0 (b). The 2 traces in a are the same record on different vertical scales. c, Prolonged (20 second), successive step changes in pH between 7.4 and 6.7 evoke current in an ASIC3-transfected cell (c2) but not in an nontransfected cell (c1); sustained current is greatest at pH 7.0. B, The sustained ASIC3 current is undiminished throughout a 20 minute stimulus to pH 7.0 (begin and ending pH is 7.4). C, The bell-shaped activation curve (I vs pH) of sustained ASIC3 currents peaks at pH 7.0 (n=6). Magnitude is the same whether current is evoked by a simple step to pH 7.0 (star) or a series of steps as in Figure 1Ac (solid circles). The magnitude is roughly similar to that of sustained current that occurs at pH 5.0 (open circle). Values are normalized to the peak transient current measured at pH 5.0. D, The sustained current is Na+ selective with a positive reversal potential (+41.9±1.6 mV) that shifts toward 0 (+17.3±2.1 mV) when [Na+]O is dropped from 140 to 40 mmol/L (n=4). Current-voltage relationships were obtained by subtracting currents induced by voltage ramps (80 mV/sec) at pH 7.4 from those at pH 7.0 (inset).

Figure 1C plots the pH dependence of the average amplitude of this sustained current. Amplitudes are divided by the peak current measured at pH 5.0, showing that sustained currents are only a small fraction (&0.002) of the maximal ASIC current. Amplitudes of sustained current at pH 7.0 and pH 5.0 (open circle) are roughly similar. Neither current occurs in nontransfected cells, so they both flow through ASIC3. However, they can differ in ionic selectivity: sustained currents at pH 7.0 are Na+ selective (PNa/PK=8.2) in both ASIC3 homomers (Figure 1D) and heteromers (see Figure 5), whereas ASIC3 heteromers make nonselective sustained current at pH 5.0.15


Figure 5
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Responses of other homo- and heteromerically expressed ASIC channels. A, Left-most currents (a, d, f, h, and j) evoked by change from pH 7.4 to 5.0 or 4.0 in cells transfected with the indicated channel(s); middle currents from the same cells in response to the slow pH protocol drawn above. ASIC1a and ASIC2a homomers do not make sustained current (b and e) even though ASIC1a does make a transient current at pH 6.9 (c). The heteromer of ASIC1a and ASIC3 has the rapid desensitization of ASIC3 (f), but, like ASIC1, it fails to make sustained current (g). The ASIC2a/3 heteromer (i) requires slightly more acidic pH to generate sustained current, whereas coexpression of ASIC2b and -3 is no different from ASIC3 homomers (k). B, I vs pH for the sustained currents in homomeric ASIC3 (from Figure 1C) and heteromeric ASIC2a/3 (n=6) and ASIC2b/3 (n=5). C, Sustained current of ASIC2a/3 over a wider range of pH. D, Plot of average relative current for ASIC2a/3 heteromers at all pH tested (n>4). Dashed curve is from B. Note the dip in amplitude from pH 6.5 to pH 6.0, marking where the window current declines. Current was Na+ selective (PNa:PK=4.5; n=4) at pH 6.8 but not at pH 5.0 (PNa:PK=1.3; n=4) (data not shown).

The Window of Overlap of Activation and Inactivation Underlies Sustained Current
The magnitude of the sustained ASIC3 current does not depend on the history of pH changes (star in Figure 1C); this and the bell shape of the I versus pH relation suggested that it might arise from overlap of steady-state activation and inactivation curves. Figure 2A shows a protocol that allows simultaneous measurement of activation (amplitudes near the start of the conditioning pH interval), inactivation (amplitudes evoked by the pH 6.0 step), and persistent currents (amplitudes at the end of the conditioning interval; amplified in Figure 2B). Activation and inactivation data overlap slightly (Figure 2C). Multiplying values of the two curves that are fit to the data predict the probability at each value of pH of a "window current" caused by the overlap (Figure 2D, smooth curve). This calculation closely predicts both the pH dependence and relative amplitude of the experimentally measured sustained current (triangles). Evidently, the sustained current near pH 7.0 is a simple window current.


Figure 2
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Sustained ASIC3 current evoked by the window of overlap of activation and inactivation curves. A, Dual pH step protocol (top) to measure both activation and inactivation. Conditioning steps of 20-second duration to different pH between 7.4 and 6.7 are followed by a 1-second test step to pH 6.0. Currents (bottom) from a representative ASIC3-transfected CHO cell. Peak values of currents evoked at pH 6 are used for the inactivation curve in C and peak currents during the conditioning step are used for the activation curve. B, Sustained current components evoked by the last 4-second of the conditioning pH in A are shown with amplitude magnified. C, Activation and inactivation of peak, transient ASIC3 current (n=4) obtained from the protocol in A, and normalized to pH 7.4 (inactivation) or pH 5.0 (activation). Curves fit to the points are Hill plots with half activation and half inactivation values of pH 6.7 and pH 7.1, respectively. The overlapping region of the activation and inactivation curves is magnified (inset). D, The I vs pH relationship of sustained current (triangles) measured as in B and the predicted window current (smooth curve) calculated by multiplying values at each pH of the activation and inactivation curve fits in C.

Lactate Decreases Threshold for the Window Current
Acidosis during ischemia occurs because of accumulation of lactic acid. ASIC3 is more sensitive to lactic acid than to other forms of acid because lactate subtly shifts the ASIC3 activation curve to more basic pH.14 We tested lactate on the sustained current and found that it increases sustained ASIC3 current but not because of a simple shift of the bell-shaped activation curve (Figure 3). Rather, the bell shape is broadened: lactate increases sustained current at pH 7.2 and 7.1 but does not alter current at pH 7.0 and below. In other words, lactate decreases the threshold for detecting sustained ASIC3 current. Figure I in the online data supplement confirms that the mechanism for lactate modulation of this sustained current is the same as that previously shown for transient ASIC current.14 In brief, lactate acts by decreasing the free concentration of extracellular divalent ions, and this affects the activation curve slightly more than the inactivation curve, leading to a broadened bell-shape curve.


Figure 3
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Lactate increases pH sensitivity of sustained ASIC3 current. a, Representative sustained currents from an ASIC3-transfected CHO cell in the absence and in the presence of 15 mmol/L lactate, a value reached during ischemic muscle exercise.39 b, I vs pH of the sustained ASIC3 current with and without 15 mmol/L lactate (n=5). Lactate enhanced the sustained currents at pH 7.2 and 7.1 but not at pH 7.0 to 6.8. Magnitudes normalized to value at pH 7.0 without lactate (star).

Paradoxically, Amiloride Enhances Sustained ASIC3 Currents
To our surprise, amiloride enhanced the sustained current evoked in cells transfected with ASIC3 (Figure 4A). Amiloride is the classic blocker of ASICs,6 although the block is weak, occurring at &100-fold higher concentrations than block of epithelial Na channels.17 Mutation of the putative amiloride binding site on ASIC2 unmasks another site that allows amiloride to increase ASIC current.18 Thus, the prior literature reports complexity to amiloride action on ASICs.


Figure 4
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Paradoxical action of amiloride on sustained ASIC3 current. A, Amiloride (100 µmol/L) enhances sustained current in ASIC3-transfected cells. B, Amiloride (100 µmol/L) enhances transient ASIC3 currents evoked by a step from pH 7.4 to 7.0 (a, left) but blocks ASIC3 current evoked at pH 6.0 (b). Higher concentration (2 mmol/L) inhibits ASIC3 current at pH 7 (a, right). C, The ratio of the current amplitudes in the presence and in the absence of 100 µmol/L amiloride (Iamilo/Icont) was calculated for the sustained current component at pH 7.0 (S7.0) and the transient current components at different pH values ranging from 7.0 to 5.0 (n=5 to 12). Amiloride (100 µmol/L) enhances current at the foot of the activation curve (pH 7) and inhibits current further up the curve. D, Dose-response curves for amiloride on the transient currents at pH 7.0 and 6.0. IC50=24 µmol/L at pH 6.0 (n>5 for each point).

All previously reported amiloride data were obtained by stimulating ASICs with transient pH changes that maximally activate the channels. The stimulus in Figure 4A differs by being both persistent and at a submaximal pH. Is it the persistence or the pH value that leads to enhancement? In Figure 4B, transient stimuli are applied to pH 7.0 (a) or 6.0 (b); 100 µmol/L enhances at pH 7.0 and blocks at pH 6.0. Thus, amiloride action depends on pH. At still higher amiloride concentrations, a block does develop at pH 7 (Figure 4Ba, right).

Figure 4C gives the relative current in the presence and absence of 100 µmol/L amiloride for different stimuli. The sustained current (S7.0) increases more than 2-fold, which is similar to the transient current evoked at pH 7.0. Amiloride block becomes evident at slightly more acidic pH. Figure 4D gives dose-response curves for amiloride actions on current evoked by brief pulses to pH 7.0 or 6.0 from a holding pH of 7.4. The data implies that amiloride enhances ASIC3 at the foot of the activation curve and blocks farther up the curve.

ASIC2a Confers Greater Sustained Current on ASIC3
Acid-gated currents are created by three ASIC genes, among which are 4 splice variants: ASIC1a, -1b, -2a, and -2b.7,19 ASICs 1a, 1b, 2b, 3 are certainly expressed in sensory neurons, but reports disagree about sensory expression of ASIC2a.15,20 We tested whether other subtypes generate sustained currents as does ASIC3. ASIC1a and -2a do not (Figure 5A, b and e), and coexpression of ASIC1a with ASIC3 eliminates the sustained current expected from ASIC3 homomers (Figure 5Ag). In contrast, coexpression of ASIC3 with either variant of ASIC2 generates sustained currents. Heteromeric ASIC2a/3 gives much larger currents that activate at slightly more acidic pH (Figure 5A, h and i); ASIC2b/3 is no different from ASIC3 alone (Figure 5A, j and k).

The activation curves (Figure 5B) out to pH 6.7 are bell shaped for ASIC3 and ASIC3/2b but not for ASIC3/2a. Tests of ASIC3/2a over a wider range of pH revealed a bell-shaped region around pH 6.7 followed by the larger, nonselective sustained current previously shown15 to occur at extreme pH (Figure 5C and 5D). The window current of ASIC3/2a heteromers is so acid-shifted and large that there is no pH that fails to express some sustained current. Window currents through the heteromeric channels were Na+ selective, whereas the sustained currents evoked at pH 5.0 did not distinguish Na+ from K+ (see Figure 5 legend for PNa/PK). Amiloride (100 µmol/L) increased sustained window currents evoked at pH 7.0 in both heteromers (ASIC2a/3 by 5.9-fold and ASIC2b/3 by 2.3-fold; n=4 for each; not shown).

Sustained Currents in Native Cardiac Sensory Neurons
We labeled sensory neurons that innervate the heart using a retrogradely transported fluorescent dye and then dissected and dissociated the appropriate dorsal root ganglia (Figure 6A). Figure 6B shows records from a representative cell. A very large current evoked by a brief pulse of pH 5 (left) was seen in almost all (28 of 30) cardiac afferents tested (supplemental Figure II shows a record from each cell.). A prolonged pH protocol (right) was applied under both voltage clamp (middle record) and current clamp (lower record) to 15 cardiac afferents. Sustained currents were seen in all cells but it triggered sustained firing of action potentials in only 4 (supplemental Figure III shows data from these 4). Figure 6C shows the pH dependence of current amplitude (all cells) and firing frequency (4 cells that fired repetitively). As a general rule, sustained current inputs and also sustained pH stimuli21 cause adaptation rather than repetitive firing in nociceptive sensory neurons, so it is unsurprising that only a minority of cells fired repetitively.


Figure 6
View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. The action of modest pH stimuli on cardiac sensory neurons. A, Phase and fluorescent photographs of dissociated sensory neurons, including 2 that innervated the heart. DiI-positive cells are indicated by the arrows. B, Records from a cardiac afferent (cell diameter 27 µm, rest potential –56 mV.). The large, transient ASIC currents typical of cardiac sensory neurons (a). Sustained currents (b) evoked by prolonged pH changes and the resulting action potentials (c). C, Sustained I vs pH (n=15) (a) and sustained firing vs pH (n=4) (b). Note that the I vs pH curve is not bell shaped like that of ASIC3 homomers. Current magnitude was normalized to the peak current at pH 5, which was greater than 10 nA in each cell. Firing number was obtained from the final 15 seconds at each pH. D, Amiloride (500 µmol/L) (a) and Zn2+ (100 µmol/L) (b) increase sustained currents evoked by pH 7.0x3.6±0.9 and 2.6±0.6, respectively (n=6 for amiloride; n=5 for Zn2+).

The current versus pH curve for native cardiac afferents (Figure 6C) is unlike any of the individual ASIC curves (Figure 5B): current is larger at pH 6.8 than at 7.0, unlike ASIC3 homomers, and current is evident at pH 7.2, unlike ASIC 3/2a heteromers. Other pH-sensitive channels—TRP channels or TASK channels, for example—might underlie the current, as might a mix of different ASICs. Figure 6D shows that both amiloride and zinc, a coactivator of ASICs,22 enhance the sustained current evoked by pH 7.0. Thus, the sustained current in native cardiac afferents is pharmacologically like ASICs. This shows that ASICs contribute to the current, but it does not rule out a role for other ion channels as well.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
We show here that ASIC3-containing ion channels generate perfectly sustained current near pH 7.0, a value routinely reached in the extracellular medium during myocardial and skeletal muscle ischemia. We further demonstrate that a pharmacologically similar current exists in sensory neurons that innervate the rat heart. This persistent mode of activity can explain how ASIC3 might underlie the sustained sensation of angina even though it is a desensitizing ion channel. All such speculation assumes that the channels described at the cell soma are also at the sensory nerve endings.

Importance of Small Sustained Currents in Sensory Transduction
Cardiac sensory afferents in dorsal root ganglia express ASIC3 at extraordinarily high levels: maximal currents at –70 mV are 10 to 30 nA,9,10 as high as the largest inward currents in the rat nervous system. Such a large current cannot be practical for sensory transduction because it depolarizes cells to levels that inactivate voltage-gated Na channels. We suggest that the small, sustained currents (10 to 50 pA) at the foot of the ASIC3 activation curve are the relevant signal for sensory transduction because they should depolarize only by 10 mV or less.

There are other examples where a physiologically relevant current is a small fraction of the maximal possible amplitude. Small, persistent currents through voltage-gated Na channels underlie burst firing in several neural tissues.23–25 The hyperpolarization-gated current (also called Ih and If) that contributes to cardiac diastolic depolarization is a minute fraction of the total current possible through the HCN channels expressed in sinoatrial node cells.26 Excitability theory argues that an excess number of sensors, each with a very low probability of activation, increases the likelihood of reaching threshold for an action potential.27 The arrangement enhances electrical noise, which increases the chance of reaching threshold with low-level stimuli.28 Extracellular acidosis during muscle ischemia is relatively mild, dropping only to approximately pH 7.0.12,13 ASIC3-containing channels seem appropriate for detecting this subtle signal. The more extreme pH of inflammatory pain and bone cancer29 should fully desensitize ASIC3 channels; ion channels that are less pH sensitive—TRPV1 and 2-transmembrane K channels—are more likely sensors for these conditions.30–32

The Complexity of Amiloride Action on ASICs
We found that amiloride enhances ASIC currents when they are evoked at the foot of the activation curve. Because amiloride and its analogs are the only commercially available blockers of ASICs, they are used to diagnose whether ASICs play roles in physiological studies. Our data suggest caution in such interpretations because amiloride might cause block, enhancement, or neither depending on the exact value of the pH at sensory nerve endings, a variable that is unmeasurable in complex tissue. This ambiguity compounds with the fact that amiloride affects multiple molecules (epithelial Na channels, Na/H exchangers, and T-type Ca channels) at the high concentrations used to block ASICs. The discovery of ASIC-specific peptide toxins offers important new pharmacology for studying ASICs in physiological preparations.33–35

Enhancement of ASICs by amiloride under certain conditions has been previously reported. The sustained current carried by ASIC3 evoked at extreme acidity is enhanced by amiloride.6,15 Point mutation of an amino acid thought to be part of the intrapore blocking site for amiloride did not just eliminate amiloride block of an ASIC, it caused amiloride to increase ASIC current at all pH tested.18 The authors suggested there are 2 amiloride binding sites on ASICs, 1 that blocks and 1 that enhances. Our results may be explained if action of the enhancing site is more pronounced at the foot of the activation curve and the blocking site more important at the peak.

ASIC Subtypes
Our prior studies showed that most (but not all) of ASIC current in cardiac sensory neurons used ASIC3-containing ion channels.9,10 Many sensory neurons that innervate skeletal muscle have the same phenotype, whereas relatively few such cells innervate skin.11 However, ASIC3 may not often be expressed alone.7 The sea anemone toxin, APETx2, blocks ASIC3-like current in sensory neurons at concentrations that are higher than necessary for ASIC3 homomers, suggesting the presence of ASIC3 heteromers.34

ASIC3 homomeric channels differ from heteromers in a number of ways.6,15,22,36 Here we report a further kinetic difference between homomers and heteromers: the sustained window current at modest acidity is much larger in ASIC3/2a than in either ASIC3/2b or ASIC3 homomers. The ASIC3/2a current is so acid-shifted that the window current overlaps with the extreme acid-evoked sustained current, leaving no pH without some sustained current from ASIC3/2a heteromers. ASIC2b is certainly expressed in sensory neurons,15 but there is disagreement about ASIC2a: no ASIC2a mRNA was found in rat sensory neurons,15 but an antibody to 2a was reported to label sensory neurons.20 Given the rather extreme action of ASIC2a on window current and also the ability of kinases to modulate ASIC3/2 heteromers,37,38 it becomes important to clarify this controversy.


*    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Josephine Marsh-Haffner for technical support.

Sources of Funding

Research for this study was supported by NIH grants NS37010 and HL64840. J.Y. was supported by a grant-in-aid from the Promotion and Mutual Aid Corporation for Private Schools of Japan and a Research Project of Kyorin University. H.N.W. was supported by a National Research Service Award from the NIH; L.A.N. by a scholarship from Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), Brazil.

Disclosures

None.


*    Footnotes
 
Original received February 15, 2006; revision received June 19, 2006; accepted July 18, 2006.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Lewis T. Pain in muscular ischaemia: its relation to anginal pain. Arch Intern Med. 1932; 49: 713–727.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Pan HL, Longhurst JC, Eisenach JC, Chen SR. Role of protons in activation of cardiac sympathetic C-fibre afferents during ischaemia in cats. J Physiol Aug 1. 1999; 518 (pt 3): 857–866.

3. Issberner U, Reeh PW, Steen KH. Pain due to tissue acidosis: a mechanism for inflammatory and ischemic myalgia? Neurosci Lett. 1996; 208: 191–194.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

4. Meller ST, Gebhart GF. A critical review of the afferent pathways and the potential chemical mediators involved in cardiac pain. Neuroscience. 1992; 48: 501–524.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

5. Longhurst JC, Tjen ALSC, Fu LW. Cardiac sympathetic afferent activation provoked by myocardial ischemia and reperfusion. Mechanisms and reflexes. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2001; 940: 74–95.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

6. Waldmann R, Bassilana F, de Weille J, Champigny G, Heurteaux C, Lazdunski M. Molecular cloning of a non-inactivating proton-gated Na+ channel specific for sensory neurons. J Biol Chem. 1997; 272: 20975–20978.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Waldmann R, Lazdunski M. H(+)-gated cation channels: neuronal acid sensors in the NaC/DEG family of ion channels. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1998; 8: 418–424.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

8. Krishtal O. The ASICs: signaling molecules? Modulators? Trends Neurosci. 2003; 26: 477–483.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

9. Benson CJ, Eckert SP, McCleskey EW. Acid-evoked currents in cardiac sensory neurons: a possible mediator of myocardial ischemic sensation. Circ Res. 1999; 84: 921–928.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Sutherland SP, Benson CJ, Adelman JP, McCleskey EW. Acid-sensing ion channel 3 matches the acid-gated current in cardiac ischemia-sensing neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001; 98: 711–716.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Molliver DC, Immke DC, Fierro L, Pare M, Rice FL, McCleskey EW. ASIC3, an acid-sensing ion channel, is expressed in metaboreceptive sensory neurons. Mol Pain. 2005; 1: 35.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

12. Cobbe SM, Poole-Wilson PA. The time of onset and severity of acidosis in myocardial ischaemia. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1980; 12: 745–760.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

13. Remme WJ, van den Berg R, Mantel M, Cox PH, van Hoogenhuyze DC, Krauss XH, Storm CJ, Kruyssen DA. Temporal relation of changes in regional coronary flow and myocardial lactate and nucleoside metabolism during pacing-induced ischemia. Am J Cardiol. 1986; 58: 1188–1194.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

14. Immke DC, McCleskey EW. Lactate enhances the acid-sensing Na+ channel on ischemia-sensing neurons. Nat Neurosci. 2001; 4: 869–870.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

15. Lingueglia E, de Weille JR, Bassilana F, Heurteaux C, Sakai H, Waldmann R, Lazdunski M. A modulatory subunit of acid sensing ion channels in brain and dorsal root ganglion cells. J Biol Chem. 1997; 272: 29778–29783.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Eckert SP, Taddese A, McCleskey EW. Isolation and culture of rat sensory neurons having distinct sensory modalities. J Neurosci Methods. 1997; 77: 183–190.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

17. Kellenberger S, Schild L. Epithelial sodium channel/degenerin family of ion channels: a variety of functions for a shared structure. Physiol Rev. 2002; 82: 735–767.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Adams CM, Snyder PM, Welsh MJ. Paradoxical stimulation of a DEG/ENaC channel by amiloride. J Biol Chem. 1999; 274: 15500–15504.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Benson CJ, Xie J, Wemmie JA, Price MP, Henss JM, Welsh MJ, Snyder PM. Heteromultimers of DEG/ENaC subunits form H+-gated channels in mouse sensory neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99: 2338–2343.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Alvarez de la Rosa D, Zhang P, Shao D, White F, Canessa CM. Functional implications of the localization and activity of acid-sensitive channels in rat peripheral nervous system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99: 2326–2331.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Deval E, Baron A, Lingueglia E, Mazarguil H, Zajac JM, Lazdunski M. Effects of neuropeptide SF and related peptides on acid sensing ion channel 3 and sensory neuron excitability. Neuropharmacology. 2003; 44: 662–671.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

22. Baron A, Schaefer L, Lingueglia E, Champigny G, Lazdunski M. Zn2+ and H+ are coactivators of acid-sensing ion channels. J Biol Chem. 2001; 276: 35361–35367.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Kay AR, Sugimori M, Llinas R. Kinetic and stochastic properties of a persistent sodium current in mature guinea pig cerebellar Purkinje cells. J Neurophysiol. 1998; 80: 1167–1179.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Maurice N, Tkatch T, Meisler M, Sprunger LK, Surmeier DJ. D1/D5 dopamine receptor activation differentially modulates rapidly inactivating and persistent sodium currents in prefrontal cortex pyramidal neurons. J Neurosci. 2001; 21: 2268–2277.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Taddese A, Bean BP. Subthreshold sodium current from rapidly inactivating sodium channels drives spontaneous firing of tuberomammillary neurons. Neuron. 2002; 33: 587–600.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

26. DiFrancesco D. Pacemaker mechanisms in cardiac tissue. Annu Rev Physiol. 1993; 55: 455–472.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

27. Aidley D. The Physiology of Excitable Cells. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1998.

28. Traynelis SF, Jaramillo F. Getting the most out of noise in the central nervous system. Trends Neurosci. 1998; 21: 137–145.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

29. Reeh PW, Steen KH. Tissue acidosis in nociception and pain. Prog Brain Res. 1996; 113: 143–151.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

30. Strecker T, Messlinger K, Weyand M, Reeh PW. Role of different proton-sensitive channels in releasing calcitonin gene-related peptide from isolated hearts of mutant mice. Cardiovasc Res. 2005; 65: 405–410.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. Ghilardi JR, Rohrich H, Lindsay TH, Sevcik MA, Schwei MJ, Kubota K, Halvorson KG, Poblete J, Chaplan SR, Dubin AE, Carruthers NI, Swanson D, Kuskowski M, Flores CM, Julius D, Mantyh PW. Selective blockade of the capsaicin receptor TRPV1 attenuates bone cancer pain. J Neurosci. 2005; 25: 3126–3131.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

32. Cooper BY, Johnson RD, Rau KK. Characterization and function of TWIK-related acid sensing K+ channels in a rat nociceptive cell. Neuroscience. 2004; 129: 209–224.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

33. Escoubas P, De Weille JR, Lecoq A, Diochot S, Waldmann R, Champigny G, Moinier D, Menez A, Lazdunski M. Isolation of a tarantula toxin specific for a class of proton-gated Na+ channels. J Biol Chem. 2000; 275: 25116–25121.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

34. Diochot S, Baron A, Rash LD, Deval E, Escoubas P, Scarzello S, Salinas M, Lazdunski M. A new sea anemone peptide, APETx2, inhibits ASIC3, a major acid-sensitive channel in sensory neurons. EMBO J. 2004; 23: 1516–1525.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

35. Chen X, Kalbacher H, Grunder S. The tarantula toxin psalmotoxin 1 inhibits acid-sensing ion channel (ASIC) 1a by increasing its apparent H+ affinity. J Gen Physiol. 2005; 126: 71–79.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

36. Hesselager M, Timmermann DB, Ahring PK. pH dependency and desensitization kinetics of heterologously expressed combinations of acid-sensing ion channel subunits. J Biol Chem. 2004; 279: 11006–11015.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

37. Baron A, Deval E, Salinas M, Lingueglia E, Voilley N, Lazdunski M. Protein kinase C stimulates the acid-sensing ion channel ASIC2a via the PDZ domain-containing protein PICK1. J Biol Chem. 2002; 277: 50463–50468.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

38. Deval E, Salinas M, Baron A, Lingueglia E, Lazdunski M. ASIC2b-dependent regulation of ASIC3, an essential acid-sensing ion channel subunit in sensory neurons via the partner protein PICK-1. J Biol Chem. 2004; 279: 19531–19539.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

39. Cohen RD, Woods HF. Lactic acidosis revisited. Diabetes. 1983; 32: 181–191.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Related Article:

Molecular pH Probes: Mediators of Angina and Ischemic Preconditioning?
James K. Bubien and Dale J. Benos
Circ. Res. 2006 99: 453-454. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
J. L. McCord, H. Tsuchimochi, and M. P. Kaufman
Acid-sensing ion channels contribute to the metaboreceptor component of the exercise pressor reflex
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2009; 297(1): H443 - H449.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
M. Ettaiche, E. Deval, S. Pagnotta, M. Lazdunski, and E. Lingueglia
Acid-Sensing Ion Channel 3 in Retinal Function and Survival
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., May 1, 2009; 50(5): 2417 - 2426.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
D. G. McGillivray, T. Garland Jr, E. M. Dlugosz, M. A. Chappell, and D. A. Syme
Changes in efficiency and myosin expression in the small-muscle phenotype of mice selectively bred for high voluntary running activity
J. Exp. Biol., April 1, 2009; 212(7): 977 - 985.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. R. Light, R. W. Hughen, J. Zhang, J. Rainier, Z. Liu, and J. Lee
Dorsal Root Ganglion Neurons Innervating Skeletal Muscle Respond to Physiological Combinations of Protons, ATP, and Lactate Mediated by ASIC, P2X, and TRPV1
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2008; 100(3): 1184 - 1201.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
Z.-Y. Tan, Y. Lu, C. A. Whiteis, C. J. Benson, M. W. Chapleau, and F. M. Abboud
Acid-Sensing Ion Channels Contribute to Transduction of Extracellular Acidosis in Rat Carotid Body Glomus Cells
Circ. Res., November 9, 2007; 101(10): 1009 - 1019.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
X. Chen, G. Polleichtner, I. Kadurin, and S. Grunder
Zebrafish Acid-sensing Ion Channel (ASIC) 4, Characterization of Homo- and Heteromeric Channels, and Identification of Regions Important for Activation by H+
J. Biol. Chem., October 19, 2007; 282(42): 30406 - 30413.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
E. Lingueglia
Acid-sensing Ion Channels in Sensory Perception
J. Biol. Chem., June 15, 2007; 282(24): 17325 - 17329.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JGPHome page
K. A. Cushman, J. Marsh-Haffner, J. P. Adelman, and E. W. McCleskey
A Conformation Change in the Extracellular Domain that Accompanies Desensitization of Acid-sensing Ion Channel (ASIC) 3
J. Gen. Physiol., March 26, 2007; 129(4): 345 - 350.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
J. K. Bubien and D. J. Benos
Molecular pH Probes: Mediators of Angina and Ischemic Preconditioning?
Circ. Res., September 1, 2006; 99(5): 453 - 454.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
99/5/501    most recent
01.RES.0000238388.79295.4cv1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yagi, J.
Right arrow Articles by McCleskey, E. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yagi, J.
Right arrow Articles by McCleskey, E. W.
Related Collections
Right arrow Ischemic biology - basic studies
Right arrow Ion channels/membrane transport
Right arrow Autonomic, reflex, and neurohumoral control of circulation
Right arrowRelated Article