Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation Research
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation Research. 2006;99:228-230
doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000236795.57759.45
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dorn, G. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dorn, G. W., II
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article
(Circulation Research. 2006;99:228.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.


Editorials

Containing Hypertrophy With a PICOT Fence

Gerald W. Dorn, II

From the Center for Molecular Cardiovascular Research, University of Cincinnati, Ohio.

Correspondence to Gerald W Dorn II MD, Hanna Professor and Director, Molecular Cardiovascular Research, 231 Albert Sabin Way, ML 0839, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0839. E-mail dorngw{at}ucmail.uc.edu



See related article, pages 307–314


Key Words: Protein kinase C • hypertrophy regression • transgenic mouse


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
*Introduction
down arrowWhy Is a Big...
down arrowContaining the Enemy
down arrowReferences
 
Cardiac hypertrophy is the common myocardial response to chronic hemodynamic overload. It currently affects nearly 5 million Americans and is responsible for &50 000 deaths annually.


*    Why Is a Big Heart a Bad Thing?
up arrowTop
up arrowIntroduction
*Why Is a Big...
down arrowContaining the Enemy
down arrowReferences
 
From the perspective of cardiac mechanics, it seems surprising that cardiac hypertrophy is a killer. The physics of reactive hypertrophy date to the 19th century1 and predict that hypertrophy will compensate for increased hemodynamic loading through normalization of ventricular wall stress, the phylogenetically conserved set point for cardiac load.2 The Laplace relationship (stress=1/2 pr/h), describes wall stress increasing in direct proportion with intraluminal pressure (p) and chamber radius (r), but decreasing as wall thickness (h) grows. Accordingly, whether the ventricle dilates or is subjected to increased pressure, hypertrophic thickening of its walls should compensate.3 And it does. However, long-term functional compensation relies on the quality of hypertrophied myocardium being invariant as quantity increases, which is not the case. Multiple studies have defined molecular, cellular, and functional characteristics of reactive hypertrophy that differentiate it from normal myocardium and from cardiac enlargement caused by physiological conditioning.4–6 Such findings gave rise to the notions of pathological and physiological hypertrophies7 and provide a mechanistic framework for why reactive hypertrophy ultimately fails,8 whereas physiological conditioning of the heart does not.

Cardiac hypertrophy also has effects unrelated to contractility and ventricular ejection performance. To quote Joseph Stalin out of context, "Quantity has a quality all its own", meaning that a steady quantitative change can create a sudden qualitative shift. The heart aptly demonstrates this principle because reactive hypertrophy and wall thickening increase ventricular stiffness, which leads to diastolic dysfunction and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.9

Moreover, a number of studies have suggested that cardiac hypertrophy is not essential to functional compensation after pressure overload. When genetic techniques were employed to inhibit critical hypertrophy signaling pathways after pressure overloading of mice, the absence of reactive hypertrophy was not associated with functional deterioration.10–12 Although the long-term efficacy of hypertrophy inhibition and its chronic consequences on ventricular function have not been completely defined, these results demonstrate that it is possible to suppress reactive hypertrophy without catastrophic functional decompensation. Thus, cardiac hypertrophy appears to be both undesirable and dispensable.


*    Containing the Enemy
up arrowTop
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowWhy Is a Big...
*Containing the Enemy
down arrowReferences
 
If the stimulus for hypertrophy cannot be eliminated, what approach for controlling hypertrophy will best translate to the clinic? Hypertrophy signaling might be inhibited, and myocardial angiotensin II, {alpha}-adrenergic, and endothelin pathways that stimulate Gq signaling have been identified as attractive targets.13,14 Indeed, clinical hypertrophy regression has been achieved by targeting angiotensin signaling,15 but it is likely that regression is caused by not only attenuation of hypertrophy signaling, but by decreased ventricular loading as well. In theory, it may also be undesirable to inhibit one hypertrophy-stimulating agonist pathway while leaving intact other receptor systems that can activate the same downstream signaling events.

A complementary approach would be to mimic or enhance the activity of endogenous hypertrophy inhibitors. In this issue of Circulation Research, Jeong et al16 searched for such inhibitors using PCR-based subtractive RNA profiling of differentially regulated genes in aortic banded rats, thus identifying protein kinase C (PKC)-interacting cousin of thioredoxin, or PICOT. Confirmatory Northern analyses showed that PICOT RNA was increased in vitro by treatment of cultured neonatal rat cardiomyocytes with hypertrophic agonists and in vivo in cardiac myocytes of transverse aortic banded rats, demonstrating that it is a cardiomyocyte-specific hypertrophy-inducible factor. Adenoviral overexpression of PICOT in neonatal rat cardiomyocytes attenuated phenylephrine- and endothelin-stimulated cell enlargement, sarcomeric organization, atrial natriuretic factor expression, and protein incorporation. Antihypertrophic properties were also observed with in vivo transgenic overexpression of PICOT, which inhibited by 50% pressure overload hypertrophy measured 2 weeks after transverse aortic banding. Importantly, PICOT overexpression was also associated with improved left ventricular contractile performance in unbanded mice, suggesting that it may have dual benefits.

Are the antihypertrophic and positive inotropic effects of PICOT a consequence of its interaction with, and inhibition of, PKC? Earlier studies have demonstrated hypertrophic effects of PKC{alpha} and PKC{delta} and negatively inotropic effects of PKC{alpha}.14,17,18 Therefore, inhibition of these cardiac PKCs by PICOT might diminish hypertophy and enhance contractility. However, caution is warranted before concluding that this is the only operant mechanism. Jeong et al show that total PKC activity in endothelin-1 and phenylephrine-stimulated neonatal rat cardiac myocytes is diminished by adenoviral overexpression of PICOT, as is phosphorylation of PKC{alpha}, PKC{alpha}, and PKC{zeta}.16 It is important to note that the data do not show that PICOT interacts with these PKC isoforms in cardiac myocytes, and that the original description of PICOT as a PKC{theta}-interacting protein found no interaction with PKC{alpha} in Jurkat cells.19 Thus, PICOT exhibits interactive specificity for PKC isoforms, and the details of its physical association with, and inhibition of, different PKCs in the heart await further investigation.

As with all newly described hypertrophy modulating factors, questions arise. First, is there a relationship between positive inotropy and hypertrophy inhibition by PICOT? Improved performance tends to move the heart to the left in the pressure-volume plane. Under consistent loading conditions a smaller heart would be expected to have less wall stress and thus less stimulus to hypertrophy. Second, can the inotropic and antihypertrophic effects of PICOT be disassociated? A number of biochemical sequelae of PICOT expression in cardiomyocytes that may relate to one or the other response were observed: inhibition of PKC, inhibition of mitogen-activated protein kinases, increased calcium sensitivity of the contractile apparatus, and enhanced sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium reuptake. Because there is considerable cross-talk between hypertrophy-signaling pathways it is possible that each of these effects is caused by PKC inhibition. As presented, the data do not establish a causal relation between these events and either in vivo hypertrophy inhibition or positive inotropism because the mechanistic studies were performed in adenoviral-transfected adult rat cardiac myocytes rather than myocytes obtained from PICOT transgenic mice. Levels of PICOT expression differed substantially between the 2 systems, as did time of expression. To more clearly relate the cellular and in vivo effects of PICOT will require isolated cardiomyocyte and signaling studies from the transgenic mouse. Even then, functional promiscuity seen with overexpressed signaling factors may confound the results.

PICOT joins an expanding list of endogenous factors that inhibit specific hypertrophy signaling pathways in the heart, some of which are shown in the Figure. Sadoshima has classified endogenous negative regulators of hypertrophy as either constitutively expressed or inducible.20 Constitutive inhibitors include glycogen synthase kinase 3-ß, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors, and class II histone deacetylases. Hypertrophy-inducible negative regulators, of which PICOT appears to be one, include atrial and brain natriuretic peptides, the calcium binding S100ß protein, and myocyte-enriched calcineurin-interacting protein (MCIP1). Interestingly, recent studies using gene ablation have indicated that MCIP1 effects can vary with physiological context.21,22 Likewise, PICOT gene ablation will ultimately be required to determine whether its absence will affect baseline cardiac mass.


Figure 1
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Endogenous inhibitors of major hypertrophy signaling pathways. To the left is the insulin-like growth factor (IGF) pathway, a tyrosine kinase receptor that stimulates hypertrophy via activation of phosphatidyl inositol-3 kinase (PI3K). Downstream in this pathway is the constitutively expressed hypertrophy inhibitor glycogen synthase kinase (GSK-3ß), which phosphorylates and inhibits DNA binding of GATA4 and NFAT transcription factors. Phosphorylation of GSK-3ßby Akt/PKB releases these transcription factors from tonic inhibition. To the right is the neurohormonal signaling pathway mediated by receptors for angiotensin II (Ang II), the {alpha}1-adrenergic agonist phenylephrine (PE), and endothelin-1 (ET), which increase intracellular calcium (Ca2+) via activation of Gq and phospholipase C (not shown). Calcium can activate calcineurin (CN), PKC, and calmodulin kinase (CaMK). PKC activation of transcription factor AP1 is inhibited by hypertrophy-induced PICOT. PKC also activates PKD which, along with CaMK, phosphorylates and inactivates the constitutive hypertrophy inhibitors, class II histone deacetylaces (HDAC), thus releasing transcription factor MEF-2 from tonic inhibition.

The study by Jeong and colleagues represents a significant step in delineating endogenous inhibitors of critical hypertrophy signaling pathways and emphasizes the potential of pursuing strategies to augment or mimic their effects. Will PICOT have therapeutic utility in hypertrophy and/or heart failure? At present, it is impossible to tell. Certainly, other candidate inhibitors have been difficult to modulate in a manner that is readily translatable to the clinic. However, the existence of a hypertrophy-inducible, PKC-inhibiting negative regulator of hypertrophy lends support for targeting PKCs. Toward this end, small molecule inhibitors of PKCs show promise as inotropic agents that can ameliorate heart failure in experimental models.23 In the future, with so many hypertrophy-inhibiting factors from which therapeutics could potentially be developed,21 we may be containing hypertrophy with a "pick it" fence.


*    Acknowledgments
 
Sources of Funding

Supported by NHLBI HL59888,HL58010, HL77101, and HL69779.

Disclosures

None.


*    Footnotes
 
The opinions expressed in this editorial are not necessarily those of the editors or of the American Heart Association.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowWhy Is a Big...
up arrowContaining the Enemy
*References
 

  1. Woods RH. A few applications of a physical theorem to membranes in the human body in a state of tension. J Anat Physiol. 1892; 26: 362–370.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Seymour RS, Blaylock AJ. The principle of Laplace and scaling of ventricular wall stress and blood pressure in mammals and birds. Physiol Biochem Zool. 2000; 73: 389–405.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Grossman W, Jones D, McLaurin LP. Wall stress and patterns of hypertrophy in the human left ventricle. J Clin Invest. 1975; 56: 56–64.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Allen DL, Harrison BC, Maass A, Bell ML, Byrnes WC, Leinwand LA. Cardiac and skeletal muscle adaptations to voluntary wheel running in the mouse. J Appl Physiol. 2001; 90: 1900–1908.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Kong SW, Bodyak N, Yue P, Liu Z, Brown J, Izumo S, Kang PM. Genetic expression profiles during physiological and pathological cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure in rats. Physiol Genomics. 2005; 21: 34–42.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Perrino C, Prasad SV, Mao L, Noma T, Yan Z, Kim HS, Smithies O, Rockman HA. Intermittent pressure overload triggers hypertrophy-independent cardiac dysfunction and vascular rarefaction. J Clin Invest. 2006; 116: 1547–1560.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Dorn GW, Robbins J, Sugden PH. Phenotyping hypertrophy: eschew obfuscation. Circ Res. 2003; 92: 1171–1175.[Free Full Text]
  8. Meerson FZ. On the mechanism of compensatory hyperformation and insufficiency of the heart. Cor Vasa. 1961; 8: 161–177.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Kitzman DW, Little WC, Brubaker PH, Anderson RT, Hundley WG, Marburger CT, Brosnihan B, Morgan TM, Stewart KP. Pathophysiological characterization of isolated diastolic heart failure in comparison to systolic heart failure. JAMA. 2002; 288: 2144–2150.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Esposito G, Rapacciuolo A, Naga Prasad SV, Takaoka H, Thomas SA, Koch WJ, Rockman HA. Genetic alterations that inhibit in vivo pressure-overload hypertrophy prevent cardiac dysfunction despite increased wall stress. Circulation. 2002; 105: 85–92.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Hill JA, Karimi M, Kutschke W, Davisson RL, Zimmerman K, Wang Z, Kerber RE, Weiss RM. Cardiac hypertrophy is not a required compensatory response to short-term pressure overload. Circulation. 2000; 101: 2863–2869.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Hill JA, Rothermel B, Yoo KD, Cabuay B, Demetroulis E, Weiss RM, Kutschke W, Bassel-Duby R, Williams RS. Targeted inhibition of calcineurin in pressure-overload cardiac hypertrophy. Preservation of systolic function. J Biol Chem. 2002; 277: 10251–10255.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Frey N, Olson EN. Cardica hypertrophy: the good, the bad, and the ugly. Annu Rev Physiol. 2003; 65: 45–79.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Dorn GW, Force T. Protein kinase cascades in the regulation of cardiac hypertrophy. J Clin Invest. 2005; 115: 527–537.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Parmley WW. Evolution of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in hypertension, heart failure, and vascular protection. Am J Med. 1998; 105: 27S–31S.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Jeong D, Cha H, Kim E, Kang M, Yang DK, Kim JM, Yoon PO, Oh JG, Bernecker OY, Sakata S, Thu LT, Cui L, Lee YH, Kim DH, Woo SH, Liao R, Hajjar RJ, Park WJ. PICOT inhibits cardiac hypertrophy and enhances ventricular function and cardiomyocyte contractility. Circ Res. 2006; 99: 307–314.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Hahn HS, Marreez Y, Odley A, Sterbling A, Yussman MG, Hilty KC, Bodi I, Liggett SB, Schwartz A, Dorn GW. Protein kinase Calpha negatively regulates systolic and diastolic function in pathological hypertrophy. Circ Res. 2003; 93: 1111–1119.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Braz JC, Gregory K, Pathak A, Zhao W, Sahin B, Klevitsky R, Kimball TF, Lorenz JN, Nairn AC, Liggett SB, Bodi I, Wang S, Schwartz A, Lakatta EG, DePaoli-Roach AA, Robbins J, Hewett TE, Bibb JA, Westfall MV, Kranias EG, Molkentin JD. PKC-alpha regulates cardiac contractility and propensity toward heart failure. Nat Med. 2004; 10: 248–254.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Witte S, Villalba M, Bi K, Liu Y, Isakov N, Altman A. Inhibition of the c-Jun N-terminal kinase/AP-1 and NF-kappaB pathways by PICOT, a novel protein kinase C-interacting protein with a thioredoxin homology domain. J Biol Chem. 2000; 275: 1902–1909.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Hardt SE, Sadoshima J. Negative regulators of cardiac hypertrophy. Cardiovasc Res. 2004; 63: 500–509.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Vega RB, Rothermel BA, Weinheimer CJ, Kovacs A, Naseem RH, Bassel-Duby R, Williams RS, Olson EN. Dual roles of modulatory calcineurin-interacting protein 1 in cardiac hypertrophy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100: 669–674.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Sanna B, Brandt EB, Kaiser RA, Pfluger P, Witt SA, Kimball TR, van Rooij E, De Windt LJ, Rothenberg ME, Tschop MH, Benoit SC, Molkentin JD. Modulatory calcineurin-interacting proteins 1 and 2 function as calcineurin facilitators in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006; 103: 7327–7332.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Hambleton MA, Hahn H, Pleger ST, Kuhn M, Klevitsky R, Carr AN, Kimball TF, Hewett TE, Dorn II GW, Koch WJ, Molkentin JD. Pharmacologic- and gene therapeutic-based inhibition of PKC{alpha}/ß enhances cardiac contractility and attenuates heart failure. Circulation. 2006; In press.

Related Article:

PICOT Inhibits Cardiac Hypertrophy and Enhances Ventricular Function and Cardiomyocyte Contractility
Dongtak Jeong, Hyeseon Cha, Eunyoung Kim, Misuk Kang, Dong Kwon Yang, Ji Myoung Kim, Pyoung Oh Yoon, Jae Gyun Oh, Oliver Y. Bernecker, Susumu Sakata, Le Thi Thu, Lei Cui, Young-Hoon Lee, Do Han Kim, Sun-Hee Woo, Ronglih Liao, Roger J. Hajjar, and Woo Jin Park
Circ. Res. 2006 99: 307-314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
A. M. Samarel
PICOT: A Multidomain Scaffolding Inhibitor of Hypertrophic Signal Transduction
Circ. Res., March 28, 2008; 102(6): 625 - 627.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PhysiologyHome page
A. Diwan and G. W. Dorn II
Decompensation of Cardiac Hypertrophy: Cellular Mechanisms and Novel Therapeutic Targets
Physiology, February 1, 2007; 22(1): 56 - 64.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dorn, G. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dorn, G. W., II
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article