| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Molecular Medicine |
From the Center for Cardiovascular Research/Institute of Pharmacology (J.H.S., M.M., J.R., T.U., H.F.-K.), Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (M.M.), and Center for Cardiovascular Research (K.E., P.R.), CharitéUniversitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany; Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics (K.E., P.R.), Berlin, Germany; and Cancer Biology and Genetics Program (R.M.H., P.P.P.), Sloan-Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York.
Correspondence to Heiko Funke-Kaiser, Center for Cardiovascular Research (CCR)/Institute of Pharmacology, CharitéUniversitätsmedizin Berlin, Hessische Strasse 3-4, 10115 Berlin, Germany. E-mail heiko.funke-kaiser{at}charite.de
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
subunit of the phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase (PI3K-p85
). Small interfering RNA against the RER abolished these effects. A PLZF cis-element in the RER promoter was identified by site-directed mutagenesis and electrophoretic mobility-shift assay. Renin stimulation caused a 6-fold recruitment of PLZF to this promoter region as shown by chromatin immunoprecipitation. Moreover, renin stimulation of rat H9c2 cardiomyoblasts induced an increase of cell number and a decrease of apoptosis. These effects were partly abolished by PI3K inhibition and completely abrogated by small interfering RNA against PLZF. Finally, experiments in PLZF knockout mice confirmed the role of PLZF as an upstream regulator of RER and PI3K-p85
. Our data demonstrate the existence of a novel signal transduction pathway involving the ligand renin, RER, and the transcription factor PLZF, which is of physiological and putative pathophysiological relevance.
Key Words: renin receptor PLZF ChIP signal transduction
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The mRNA of the receptor is highly expressed in brain, heart, and placenta with highest levels in the brain. In contrast, kidney, liver and pancreas show low mRNA expression levels.2,3 Via immunofluorescence, the receptor has been detected in mesangial and vascular smooth muscle cells of human heart and kidney.2,3 In addition, mRNA and protein expression have been demonstrated in macrophages, T cells, and granulocytes.4 The receptor is expressed on the cell surface in transfected mesangial cells,3 but there are also indications of an (additional) intracellular receptor localization.2,4
The cloned RER probably corresponds to the previously identified renin binding site on mesangial cells implicated in regulation of the plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 and hypertrophic effects.3,5 Very recently, it was shown that transgenic overexpression of the RER in smooth muscle cells causes a blood pressure elevation and an increase in heart rate.6
Concerning proteins encoded by the RER gene, it is of interest that the C-terminal part of the RER is identical to the vacuolar proton-translocating ATPase (V-ATPase) membrane sectorassociated protein M8-9 (APT6M8-9, also known as ATP6AP2).7,8 V-ATPases, in general, exert several cellular functions such as neurotransmitter uptake and storage, endocytosis, and receptor recycling.9 Furthermore, RER and CAPER (homo sapiens endoplasmic reticulum [ER]-localized type I transmembrane adaptor precursor) are identical transcripts (GenBank accession no. AY038990). CAPER was identified in a yeast 2-hybrid screen using the ubiquitous tyrosine phosphatase PRL-1 (Phosphatase of Regenerating Liver-1) as bait (personal communication, R. Herbst, Palo Alto, LA). PRL-1 is involved in the regulation of cellular proliferation and transformation and exhibits a cell cycledependent subcellular localization, being localized to the ER in resting cells and to centrosomes and the spindle apparatus in mitotic cells.10
No direct protein interaction partner of the RER has been described so far. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyze the signal transduction cascade of the RER based on protein-protein and downstream protein-DNA interactions, as well as on its subcellular localization. Furthermore, we studied the promoter architecture of the RER to mechanistically explain its cellular expression pattern.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
All other methods are described in the online data supplement, available at http://circres.ahajournals.org.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
To analyze the gene regulatory mechanisms responsible for the observed ubiquitous expression of the RER, we determined its transcriptional start sites and examined its promoter function. A RNA ligase-mediated 5' rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) experiment, which only amplified capped mRNA, indicated multiple transcriptional start sites at positions 76, 86, 96, 102, 105, 112, and 125 bp upstream of the translational start codon (Figure 2A), which is consistent with the TATA boxless architecture of this promoter.11 In addition, 3 serial-deletion mutants of the human RER promoter (spanning 126, 500, and 1100 bp upstream of the translational start codon) were subcloned for luciferase reporter gene assay. The RER promoter is characterized by a very high promoter activity in the examined neuronal, endothelial, and epithelial cell lines (Figure 2B). Its activity is even higher than the activity of the human ECE-1c promoter, which was shown to be a strong, ubiquitous housekeeping promoter (Figure 2B).12,13 Additionally, our results indicate that 500 bp of the human RER promoter are sufficient to drive maximal promoter activity in these cell types (Figure 2B).
|
Subcellular Localization of the RER
Because the subcellular localization of the RER may be a clue for the understanding of its function, we addressed this question using different methods. Initially, the localization of the RER within cellular membranes (ie, plasma membrane and/or membranes of organelles) was demonstrated by fractionated protein isolation followed by Western blotting of HeLa-S3 cells (Figure 3A). The observed molecular mass of approximately 38 to 39 kDa in the membrane fraction is consistent with the size of full-length RER described by Nguyen et al,3 whereas the lower band of approximately 35 to 36 kDa seen in cytosolic and membrane fractions (Figure 3A) likely corresponds to the
4-splice variant reported by Ramser et al,8 in which the 96 bp-sized exon 4 is missing.
|
To further analyze the cellular membrane compartment in which the RER is localized, we performed a set of fluorescence microscopic experiments. Immunocytology of c-myc- and FLAG-tagged RER in HeLa-S3 cells indicated a perinuclear localization (Figure 3B). We next generated 3 different enhanced green fluorescence protein (EGFP) fusion proteins of the RER (each as N- and C-terminal fusion): (1) a full-length wild-type RER (RER full); (2) a full-length RER in which its atypical ER-retention motif KXXXX14,15 was mutated to RXXXX (RER K/R mut); and (3) the V-ATPase segment of the RER (RER ATPase). The full-length RER construct showed again a perinuclear localization and colocalized with a marker of the ER (Figure 3C). Mutagenesis of the ER retention motif resulted in a loss of perinuclear/ER localization (Figure 3C). Interestingly, the V-ATPase segment of the RER showed a different localization pattern compared with the full-length RER, as it was localized primarily to the lysosomal compartment (Figure 3C). EGFP N-terminally fused to these constructs yielded similar results (data not shown).
Protein-Protein Interaction Partners of the RER
No direct molecular interactions of the RER have been described so far. Therefore, a major objective of our study was to identify protein interaction partners of this ubiquitously expressed receptor to gain insight into its signal transduction cascade. For this purpose, we performed a yeast 2-hybrid screening using a human adult heart cDNA library (prey) and the full-length human RER (bait). The C-terminal third of the transcription factor PLZF (PromyeLocytic Zinc Finger protein) was identified as RER-interacting protein in 4 clones, 3 of which were independent. To confirm this RER-PLZF interaction, we performed a coimmunoprecipitation (CoIP) using transient transfections of full-length human RER and full-length human PLZF. Figure 4A demonstrates the ability of the RER to interact with PLZF in a system using tagged proteins. This finding was further confirmed in an endogenous context (Figure 4B).
|
In an additional CoIP experiment using C- and N-terminal deletion mutants of the RER, we identified the C-terminal, cytoplasmic region of the RER as the interaction domain for PLZF (Figure 4C).
Because dimerization is a common feature of several receptors, we investigated whether homodimerization may also be a characteristic of the RER. For this purpose, human RER constructs with 2 different tags were transiently transfected. CoIP experiments indicated that the RER is able to form homodimers (Figure 4D).
Functional Analysis of the Renin-RER-PLZF Signal Transduction Pathway
In initial experiments involving PLZF overexpression in HEK293 cells (which endogenously express RER and PLZF mRNA [data not shown]), we observed that RER mRNA is reduced by renin stimulation (to 80.6±3.3%) and PLZF transfection (to 72.6±5.2%), respectively (Figure 5A). A combination of both repressed RER mRNA to 45.4±4.7% (Figure 5A). We could substantiate these findings by using serial-deletion mutants of the human RER promoter as described above. Only a promoter construct comprising the region [501; 1100] can be repressed by PLZF cotransfection (Figure 5B).
|
Bioinformatic analysis of the RER promoter using MatInspector (http://www.genomatix.de)16 indicated the presence of a PLZF consensus sequence (5'-AACTACAGTTTTCAC-3') with a high core and matrix similarity located in the region [1097; 1083] relative to the translational start codon of the promoter.
To investigate functional downstream effects of the RER-PLZF interaction and to analyze whether these are influenced by stimulation of the RER with its ligand, renin, we performed a set of experiments in which the different components of the putative renin-RER-PLZF pathway and the promoter of the human RER were experimentally modulated in HEK293 cells.
RER stimulation was performed by renin incubation; dependence on RER was analyzed by small interfering RNA (siRNA) against this receptor; the influence of PLZF was examined by cotransfection experiments with a PLZF expression vector (overexpression was confirmed by real-time PCR [data not shown]); and the functional importance of the PLZF consensus sequence within the human RER promoter was evaluated by site-directed mutagenesis of luciferase reporter constructs. siRNA against RER repressed RER mRNA to 29.8±5.2%, as shown by real-time PCR; a similar reduction was observed by Western blotting (data not shown). Readouts comprised RER promoter activity and mRNA level. The known PLZF target gene, the p85
subunit of the phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase (PI3K-p85
), served as an additional downstream candidate gene of a RER/PLZF pathway activation.17
Stimulation of the RER with renin resulted in a decrease in the activity of a wild-type RER promoter by approximately 30% compared with all controls (Figure 5C). Importantly, the presence of the RER was necessary for this effect (Figure 5C).
Consistent with this repressive effect of PLZF on the RER promoter, site-directed mutagenesis of the PLZF consensus sequence [1097; 1083] caused a derepression (to >150%) of promoter activity. The effect of renin stimulation was also abolished by this mutagenesis (Figure 5C).
Similar but inverse effects were observed with respect to the PI3K-p85
promoter, which is known to be positively regulated by PLZF17. RER stimulation with renin caused an increase of 45% in PI3K-p85
promoter activity compared with control; this effect was abolished by downregulation of the RER using siRNA (Figure 5D).
To verify these findings, we analyzed the effect of RER stimulation on PI3K-p85
mRNA by real-time PCR analysis. Consistent with our promoter data, stimulation with renin increased PI3K-p85
mRNA in systems with and without PLZF overexpression by 105.2±6.74% or 30.2±7.9% (relative to vehicle control), respectively (Figure 5E). Again, downregulation of RER by siRNA abolished this induction regardless the expression level of PLZF (Figure 5E).
Translocation and Promoter Recruitment of PLZF on Renin Stimulation
Additionally, we examined whether activation of the RER by renin is able to cause a translocation of PLZF from the cytoplasm to the nucleus. The subcellular localization of c-myctagged PLZF was evaluated by Western blotting after fractionated extraction of nuclear and cytosolic proteins. Incubation of HEK293 cells with renin caused a clear increase in nuclear PLZF, whereas cytoplasmic PLZF almost disappeared (Figure 6A). Importantly, this translocation of PLZF again required the presence of the RER as indicated by our siRNA experiments (Figure 6A). Similar results were obtained in untransfected HEK293 cells using Western blotting against endogenous PLZF (data not shown).
|
To evaluate the recruitment of endogenous PLZF to the human RER promoter within the chromatin context, we performed a chromatin-immunoprecipitation (ChIP) experiment. To ensure valid quantification of transcription factor recruitment, immunoprecipitated DNA was quantified applying real-time PCR analysis and multiple positive and negative controls. Renin stimulation of HEK293 cells did increase the PLZF recruitment to the RER promoter region encompassing the PLZF cis-element at position [1097; 1083] approximately 6-fold (Figure 6B).
The binding of PLZF to this cis element of the human RER promoter (and not to a mutated form) was further confirmed by electrophoretic mobility-shift assay (Figure 6C), because we found a super-shifted band using a PLZF antibody. Furthermore, the observed pattern was identical compared with the positive control oligonucleotide derived from the PI3K-p85
promoter.17
Cellular Effects of the Renin-RER-PLZF Signal Transduction Pathway
To analyze the cellular effects of renin stimulation and to confirm the importance of PLZF and PI3Ks within the signal transduction cascade of the RER, we investigated the effects of renin, siRNA against PLZF, and pharmacological inhibition of PI3Ks by wortmannin in rat H9c2 cardiomyoblasts. Catalytic effects of renin incubation were excluded by blockade of the angiotensin AT receptor with 10 µmol/L losartan; mRNA of the AT2 receptor was not detectable in these cells using real-time PCR analysis (data not shown).
Renin stimulation increased the number of viable cells to 133.9% compared with vehicle control. Preincubation with wortmannin partly abolished this effect, whereas siRNA against PLZF completely abrogated proproliferative effects of renin stimulation (Figure 7A). Consistent results were observed regarding apoptosis using caspase 3 and 7 activity as readout. Renin stimulation decreased caspase activity to 45.9% (in comparison to vehicle). Wortmannin partly and PLZF siRNA completely abolished this effect (Figure 7B).
|
To confirm the gene regulatory downstream effects of RER activation in cardiomyoblasts, we also measured RER and PI3K-p85
mRNA in this experimental setting. RER mRNA decreased to 53.7% under renin stimulation compared with vehicle control. siRNA against PLZF (which repressed PLZF mRNA to 15.23±9.8% as shown by real-time PCR) reconstituted RER mRNA to 86.5% (Figure 7C). Renin stimulation increased PI3K-p85
mRNA to 224.2% compared with vehicle control. siRNA against PLZF abolished this effect (Figure 7D). Wortmannin did not affect RER or PI3K-p85
mRNA levels, respectively (Figure 7C and 7D).
RER and PI3K-p85
mRNA Expression in PLZF Knockout Mice
To substantiate our findings concerning the transcriptional regulation of RER and PI3K-p85
by PLZF in vivo, we quantified the respective transcript levels in PLZF knockout (PLZF/) and wild-type (WT) control mice, respectively. PLZF was not detectable in kidney and liver of WT and PLZF/ mice. Within these organs, we did not observe any difference in mRNA levels of RER and PI3K-p85
. In contrast, a significant upregulation of RER mRNA (to 221.9% and 229.5% in heart and brain, respectively) and a significant downregulation of PI3K-p85
mRNA (to 71.8% and 48.6% in heart and brain, respectively) were detected in heart and brain of PLZF/ mice compared with WT mice, which endogenously express PLZF in these organs (Figure 8A).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and the RER itself (Figure 8B). This pathway has been confirmed in human epithelial and rat cardiomyoblasts.
Stimulation of the RER with its ligand renin causes a translocation of PLZF from the cytoplasm to the nucleus and a recruitment of PLZF to promoter regions of PI3K-p85
and the RER. Depending on the promoter context, PLZF is able to activate the transcription of PI3K-p85
and to repress the gene expression of the RER. This dual role of PLZF as activator17,18 and also repressor19,20 has been described before but, to our knowledge, not in a single cellular context. The fascinating and uncommon observation that a receptor directly interacts with a transcription factor speaks for an extraordinary short signal transduction cascade. Similar mechanisms, by which a transcription factor or nuclear factor is directly activated at a receptor site or at an extranuclear membrane, have been described for the SMAD, JAK-STAT, Notch, and SREBP pathways.21,22 Remarkably, PLZF itself represses the promoter of its own direct interaction partner RER, thereby establishing a very short negative feedback loop. The observation that a RER promoter with a mutated PLZF cis element is refractory to effects of renin stimulation (Figure 5C) indicates that this DNA motif is necessary for this feedback mechanism. Binding of PLZF to this motif was further confirmed by our electrophoretic mobility-shift assay experiments (Figure 6C). Most importantly, the recruitment of native PLZF to the corresponding cis-element region of the RER promoter was demonstrated in the chromatin context by ChIP, with a significant increase under renin stimulation (Figure 6B). The ability of renin to decrease the gene expression of RER and to increase the gene expression of PI3K-p85
depends on the presence of the RER. Therefore, our data prove the existence of the RER as a functional renin receptor, thereby confirming the work of Nguyen et al.3
Furthermore, we were able to demonstrate cellular effects of this novel renin-RER-PLZF signal transduction pathway. RER activation caused a significant increase in cell number and a concomitant decrease in apoptosis of cardiomyoblasts. These effects are mainly mediated by PLZF as shown by siRNA experiments. PI3K inhibition did affect these cellular effect to a minor degree, consistent with PI3K-p85
being a downstream target of PLZF. These effects are in accordance with the known physiological role of PLZF as discussed below. Additionally, several studies have shown that PI3Ks contribute to cardiac hypertrophy involving increase in protein synthesis and activation of the Akt pathway.17,23,24 Finally, we could demonstrate that the RER-PLZF pathway also acts in vivo. Experiments in tissues derived from PLZF knockout mice clearly show that absence of PLZF causes a derepression of RER mRNA and a decrease in PI3K-p85
mRNA in organs endogenously expressing PLZF.
The primary perinuclear subcellular localization of the RER observed in our work conflicts with the plasma membrane localization described by Nguyen et al.3 Nevertheless, all of our experiments, including use of different constructs, mutagenesis, and colocalization studies, indicated an intracellular localization of the RER. Furthermore, the total cellular membrane lysates used for their kinetic studies may still contain intracellular membrane proteins and, therefore, do not exclude an intracellular localization of the RER. The possibility that our results concerning the perinuclear localization are caused by an artifact related to tags or overexpression is unlikely because we used several different C-terminal and also N-terminal tags. In addition, mutagenesis of the atypical C-terminal ER-retention signal strongly reduced the perinuclear localization of the RER. The fact that CAPER, which is identical to the RER as discussed above, can directly bind to PRL-1 (a protein observed in the ER in nonmitotic cells) also supports our results.
On the other hand, our experiments indicate that an extracellular signal (renin) can affect the signal transduction of the RER despite its mainly intracellular localization. Several mechanisms might account for this observation. Firstly, other renin-binding receptors, such as the mannose-6-phosphate receptor, could internalize renin and prorenin.25 Secondly, a nonsecreted (ie, intracellular) renin isoform, which could directly interact with an intracellular RER, has been described containing an alternative first exon termed (albeit identical) "exon 1b"26,27 and "exon 1A,"28,29 respectively. Intracellular renin administration was reported to increase inward calcium current in cardiomyocytes.30 In addition, transgenic overexpression of the nonsecreted, intracellular form of renin and angiotensinogen in the brain causes an increase in drinking volume and mean arterial pressure.31 Thirdly, it could be possible that very small amounts of the RER within the plasma membrane are sufficient for the initiation of a RER signal transduction cascade. In this context, the observed homodimerization of the RER might also be of importance, because dimerization can affect subcellular localization.32
In this study, we were able to demonstrate a ubiquitous expression of the human RER, a high promoter activity in different cell types and multiple transcriptional start sites in a TATA boxless promoter. These features are consistent with housekeeping properties of the RER gene,13 suggesting basal cellular functions of this protein. In this context, it is of interest that the C-terminal part of the RER is, as discussed above, identical to the V-ATPase membrane sector-associated protein M8-9, because V-ATPase have functions in almost every eukaryotic cell9. Nevertheless, APT6M8-9 only constitutes 69 to 100 aa (GenBank accession no. GI:5031590)7 of the 350 aa3 of the full-length renin receptor. Therefore, the functions of the RER exceed those of a pure V-ATPase subunit, which is also supported by the data on the signal transduction and the different subcellular localizations of full-length RER and APT6M8-9 provided here. The mechanism by which the APT6M8-9 protein is generated, remains to be clarified. Alternative promoters and posttranslational cleavage by an unidentified protease are putative explanations.
The transcription factor PLZF contains multiple zinc-finger domains and is disrupted in patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) caused by t(11;17)(q23;q21) chromosomal translocation.33,34 This APL subform is characterized by PLZF-RAR
(PLZF-retinoic acid receptor-
) fusion proteins, which recruit histone deacetylase 1 (HDAC1) and do not respond to retinoic acid any more, explaining the missing response of these patients to retinoic acid treatment.3436
Wild-type PLZF can act as growth repressor and exerts proapoptotic functions during development.33,37 Concerning the RAS, it seems important to note that PLZF was recently described as an adaptor protein of the AT2 receptor in the heart.17 This direct PLZF-AT2 receptor interaction was associated with stimulation of protein synthesis and putative cardiac hypertrophy.17
Data obtained from PLZF knockout mice indicate that this transcription factor is involved in limb and axial skeletal patterning,37 whereas the brain phenotype of these mice was not described by the authors. Consistent with this observation, PLZF target genes include hox genes,3739 besides the p85
subunit of PI3K17 and cyclin A2.20
Concerning the biological significance of the RER beyond its possible role in the RAS, it was recently shown by Ramser et al that a mutation in the renin receptor gene is a cause of X-linked mental retardation (XLMR) and epilepsy (XMRE) syndrome in humans.8 Consistent with this observation are the results of a zebrafish mutagenesis screen, in which a mutation in the ATP6AP2 (which is identical to RER) gene caused a reduction in head size and necrosis of the central nervous system.40 Remarkably, the human RER mutation observed by Ramser et al altered neither binding affinity for renin nor the RER-mediated augmentation of the catalytic efficiency of renin for angiotensinogen cleavage.8 In addition, the effect of this mutation (and also the effect of wild-type RER stimulation by renin3) on mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling are only modest,8 if non-significant. Therefore, it could be possible that the human RER mutation exerts its effect by an altered PLZF-mediated signal transduction. The complex, dynamic expression of PLZF in the developing central nervous system, and its likely role in hindbrain and also forebrain segmentation supports this notion.41,42
Related to the role of the RER in central nervous system development is the observation that RER mRNA can be detected in human glioblastomas as well as in glioblastoma cell lines and that renin inhibitors can reduce the cell number in glioblastoma cell lines. This is probably caused by modulation of RER function, because this effect is independent of AT1 and AT2 receptor activity.43
The clinical relevance of the RER is underlined by the interesting observation that a decoy deca-peptide corresponding to the handle region of prorenin, which competitively inhibits prorenin binding to its receptor, attenuated the development and progression of cardiac fibrosis44 and also inhibited the development of diabetic nephropathy in rat models.45 Remarkably, a recent study demonstrated the ability of RER activation to upregulate transforming growth factor-ß1 in mesangial cells independent of angiotensin II actions.46
Knowledge regarding the signal transduction of the RER is of importance to evaluate the efficacy and safety of renin inhibitors, such as aliskiren, which is currently in phase III clinical trials.47 As expected, renin inhibitors reduce plasma renin activity (ie, enzyme activity with respect to angiotensin I generation). Nevertheless, they increase total amount of plasma renin protein, the RER ligand, dramatically (up to 34-fold48). Therefore, it is crucial to examine whether renin inhibitors change the intrinsic activity of renin with respect to the RER. In this context, it is important to note that overactivation of the RER might be deleterious (eg, with respect to end-organ damage) considering the activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases and PLZF downstream of the RER as well as the effects of the handle region decoy peptide mentioned above. On the other hand, a blockade of the RER signal transduction might be harmful, at least in pregnant women, because of the developmental importance of the RER and its direct interaction partner PLZF.
To conclude, our results demonstrate the existence of a novel signal transduction pathway downstream of the human renin/prorenin receptor, which involves direct binding of the transcription factor PLZF to the receptor, its translocation to the nucleus, and the positive and negative regulation of target genes. Based on the already described biomedical relevance of the RER and PLZF, respectively, this pathway, connecting both molecules, might be of importance in human physiology and pathophysiology.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
This project was supported by a Forschungsförderung of the CharitéUniversitätsmedizin Berlin.
Disclosures
T.U. is member of the Aliskiren International Advisory Board of Novartis Pharma AG (Basel, Suisse).
| Footnotes |
|---|
Original received July 17, 2006; revision received October 9, 2006; accepted October 25, 2006.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Related Article:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Naray-Fejes-Toth, C. Boyd, and G. Fejes-Toth Regulation of epithelial sodium transport by promyelocytic leukemia zinc finger protein Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, July 1, 2008; 295(1): F18 - F26. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. L. Feldman, L. Jin, H. Xuan, A. Contrepas, Y. Zhou, R. L. Webb, D. N. Mueller, S. Feldt, F. Cumin, W. Maniara, et al. Effects of Aliskiren on Blood Pressure, Albuminuria, and (Pro)Renin Receptor Expression in Diabetic TG(mRen-2)27 Rats Hypertension, July 1, 2008; 52(1): 130 - 136. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Werner and M. Bohm Review: The therapeutic role of RAS blockade in chronic heart failure Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease, June 1, 2008; 2(3): 167 - 177. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||