Editorials |
From the Carolina Cardiovascular Biology Center, and Departments of Medicine & Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Correspondence to Mark W. Majesky, PhD, Carolina Cardiovascular Biology Center, 8200 MBRB, Campus Box 7126, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7126. E-mail mmajesky{at}med.unc.edu
See related article, pages 378385
Key Words: smooth muscle cells LIM domain migration focal adhesions
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Discovery of LPP as a Translocation Partner in Human Lipomas |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| The LIM Domain, a Versatile Motif for ProteinProtein Interaction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Many LIM proteins, including LPP, can shuttle between the cytoplasm and the nucleus, suggesting they may transfer information directly from the cytoskeleton or focal adhesions to the transcription machinery. However, there is no compelling evidence for sequence-specific DNA binding by a LIM domain. The LIM-homeodomain class of proteins, including Isl1, can bind to DNA via their homeodomains, but not their LIM domains. When implicated in transcriptional control, LIM proteins are usually found to mediate the assembly of interacting partners to form transcriptionally active complexes. For example, LIM only protein-2 (LMO2) is a double LIM domain protein that is required for erythropoiesis in the yolk sac and early embryo.12 The tandem LIM domains of LMO2 were found to provide docking sites for GATA-1 and TAL-1/E47, thus producing a multiprotein complex with much greater transcriptional activity for key erythrocyte differentiation genes than any of the individual components alone.13 Similarly, the LIM and glycine-rich repeat-containing proteins CRP1 and CRP2 were found to form a high affinity complex between serum response factor (SRF) and GATA proteins, that greatly increased the affinity of SRF for its DNA recognition CArG box element in various SMC-specific differentiation marker genes.14
| LIM Domains Target LPP to Focal Adhesions in Smooth Muscle Cells |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.5-fold in a transwell chemotaxis assay. Moreover, treatment of HIVS cells with leptomycin-B, an inhibitor of CRM1-mediated nuclear export, caused accumulation of LPP in the nucleus.15 Cytoplasmic-nuclear shuttling has also been demonstrated for zyxin16 and TRIP6,17 suggesting it is a common property for this class of LIM proteins. Assuming these results for cytoplasmic-nuclear shuttling in vitro have counterparts in vivo, it is intriguing to consider a possible signaling role for LPP in SMCs, possibly in the feedback control of transcription of cytoskeletal proteins.
|
| LPP Is a Smooth Muscle-Restricted Protein That Promotes Cell Migration |
|---|
|
|
|---|
3-fold after 48 hours.2 Whereas previous results showed that overexpression of LPP enhanced SMC migration in vitro, the present work showed that loss of function using siRNAs against LPP produced a strong inhibition of SMC migration in response to an EGF chemotactic gradient. Of particular interest was the observation that in embryonic fibroblasts lacking focal adhesion kinase (FAK-null), LPP expression was reduced by
10-fold, whereas the contents of other focal adhesion proteins including vinculin, talin, or paxillin were not altered. Moreover, when FAK levels were restored in FAK-null cells by use of a tetracycline-based expression system, LPP levels returned to normal. Furthermore, expression of LPP in migration-defective FAK null cells led to a significant increase in cell spreading on a fibronectin matrix. These results suggest that levels of LPP in SMCs are controlled by FAK signaling and raise intriguing questions about the role of FAK and LPP as determinants of SMC phenotype. | LPP Is Expressed in Migrating SMCs in Stented Pig Coronary Arteries |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-actin (SMA) and smoothelin (SMO) in the tunica media. No expression of LPP was found in the adventitial layer. In injured vessels 28 days after stent implantation, neointimal cells migrating around the stent wound were positive for LPP and SMA, but not SMO.2 Adventitial cells remained negative, but LPP expression could be detected in the walls of microvessels located in the adventitial layer. These dynamic patterns of expression in injured coronary arteries suggest that LPP may partner with multiple players to facillitate cytoskeletal remodeling events needed to accomplish the transition from stationary to migrating SMCs in vivo. | Summary |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Gorenne I, Jin L, Yoshida T, Sanders J, Sarembock I, Owerns G, Somlyo A, Somlyo A. LPP expression during in vitro smooth muscle differentiation and stent-induced injury. Circ Res. 2006; 98: 378385.
3. Petit M, Mols R, Schoenmakers E, Mandahl N, Van de Ven W. LPP, the preferred fusion partner gene of HMGIC in lipomas, is a novel member of the LIM protein gene family. Genomics. 1996; 36: 118129.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Petit M, Fradelizi J, Golsteyn R, Ayoubi T, Menichi B, Louvard D, Van de Ven W, Friederich E. LPP, an actin cytoskeleton protein related to zyxin, harbors a nuclear export signal and transcriptional activation capacity. Mol Biol Cell. 2000; 11: 117129.
5. Crombez K, Vanoirbeek E, Van de Ven W, Petit M. Transactivation functions of the tumor-specific HMGA2/LPP fusion protein are augmented by wild-type HMGA2. Mol Cancer Res. 2005; 3: 6370.
6. Daheron L, Veinstein A, Brizard F, Drabkin H, Lacotte L, Guilhot F, Larsen C, Brizard A, Roche J. Human LPP gene is fused to MLL in a secondary acute leukemia with a t(3;11) (q28;q23). Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2001; 31: 382389.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. von Ahsen I, Rogalla P, Bullerdiek J. Expression patterns of the LPP-HMGA2 fusion transcript in pulmonary chondroid hamartomas with t(3;12)(q27 approximately 28;q14 approximately 15). Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2005; 163: 6870.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Freyd G, Kim S, Horvitz H. Novel cysteine-rich motif and homeodomain in the product of the Caenorhabditis elegans cell lineage gene lin-11. Nature. 1990; 344: 876879.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Pawson T, Nash P. Assembly of cell regulatory systems through protein interaction domains. Science. 2003; 300: 445452.
10. Konrat R, Krautler B, Weiskirchen R, Bister K. Structure of cysteine- and glycine-rich protein CRP2. Backbone dynamics reveal motional freedom and independent spatial orientation of the lim domains. J Biol Chem. 1998; 273: 2323323240.
11. Yao X, Perez-Alvarado G, Louis H, Pomies P, Hatt C, Summers M, Beckerle M. Solution structure of the chicken cysteine-rich protein CRP1, a double-LIM protein implicated in muscle differentiation. Biochemistry. 1999; 38: 57015713.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Warren A, Colledge W, Carlton M, Evans M, Smith A, Rabbitts T. The oncogenic cysteine-rich LIM domain protein rbtn2 is essential for erythroid development. Cell. 1994; 78: 4557.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Wadman I, Osada H, Grutz G, Agulnick A, Westphal H, Forester A, Rabbitts T. The LIM-only protein Lmo2 is a bridging molecule assembling an erythroid, DNA-binding complex which includes the TAL1, E47, GATA-1 and Lbd/NLI proteins. EMBO J. 1997; 16: 31453157.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Chang D, Belaguli N, Iyer D, Roberts W, Wu S, Dong X, Marx J, Moore M, Beckerle M, Majesky M, Schwartz R. Cysteine-rich LIM-only proteins CRP1 and CRP2 are potent smooth muscle differentiation cofactors. Dev Cell. 2003; 4: 107118.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Gorenne I, Nakamoto R, Phelps C, Beckerle M, Somlyo A, Somlyo A. LPP, a LIM protein highly expressed in smooth muscle. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2003; 285: C674C685.
16. Nix D, Beckerle M. Nuclear-cytoplasmic shuttling of the focal contact protein, zyxin: a potential mechanism for communication between sites of cell adhesion and the nucleus. J Cell Biol. 1997; 138: 11391147.
17. Wang Y, Gilmore T. LIM domain protein Trip6 has a conserved nuclear export signal, nuclear targeting sequences, and multiple transactivation domains. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2001; 1538: 260272.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Lu J, Landerholm T, Wei J, Dong X, Wu S, Liu X, Nagata K, Inagaki M, Majesky M. Coronary smooth muscle differentiation from proepicardial cells requires rhoA-mediated actin reorganization and p160 rho-kinase activity. Dev Biol. 2001; 240: 404418.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Mack C, Somlyo A, Hautmann M, Somlyo A, Owens G. Smooth muscle differentiation marker gene expression is regulated by rhoA-mediated actin polymerization. J Biol Chem. 2001; 276: 341347.
Related Article:
Circ. Res. 2006 98: 378-385.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Perot, J. Derre, J.-M. Coindre, F. Tirode, C. Lucchesi, O. Mariani, L. Gibault, L. Guillou, P. Terrier, and A. Aurias Strong Smooth Muscle Differentiation Is Dependent on Myocardin Gene Amplification in Most Human Retroperitoneal Leiomyosarcomas Cancer Res., March 15, 2009; 69(6): 2269 - 2278. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. L. Jones Move On!: Smooth Muscle Cell Motility Paired Down Circ. Res., March 30, 2007; 100(6): 757 - 760. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Jin, M. J. Kern, C. A. Otey, B. R. Wamhoff, and A. V. Somlyo Angiotensin II, Focal Adhesion Kinase, and PRX1 Enhance Smooth Muscle Expression of Lipoma Preferred Partner and its Newly Identified Binding Partner Palladin to Promote Cell Migration Circ. Res., March 30, 2007; 100(6): 817 - 825. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Research Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2006 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |