| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Integrative Physiology |
From the Departments of Cardiovascular Medicine (N.U., M.O., H.Y., A.M., S.M., K.T., T.N., T. Takahashi, T. Tatsumi, H.M.) and Pharmacology (K.M.), Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine; and Department of Pathology (Y.A.), Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan.
Correspondence to Mitsuhiko Okigaki, MD, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto 602-8566, Japan. E-mail okigakim{at}koto.kpu-m.ac.jp
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: restenosis endothelium progenitor cells erythropoietin
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Bone marrow (BM)-derived endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) have been isolated from the mononuclear cell (MNC) population in peripheral blood (PB).2,3 They have differentiated into ECs,2 suggesting that they may have a potential to accelerate reendothelialization. Recently, transplantation of autologous PB EPCs to balloon-denuded arteries was reported to facilitate reendothelialization of the injured artery.4,5 Intravenous transfusion of spleen-derived EPCs or EPCs overexpressing eNOS reduces neointimal formation after vascular injury.6,7 Delivery of primary cultured PB MNCs to balloon-injured arteries leads to accelerated reendothelialization to promote endothelium-dependent vasoreactivity.8
Erythropoietin (Epo) stimulates the proliferation and differentiation of erythroid lineage progenitors. Mature ECs express Epo receptors (EpoRs),9 and Epo induces proangiogenic response in cultivated mature ECs, as evidenced by EC proliferation and migration10 and the antiapoptotic effect on ECs11 as well as NO production.12 Epo increases circulating EPCs to stimulate neovascularization in vivo13 or induces proangiogenic phenotype in cultured ECs14 and also improves wound healing by angiogenesis in the genetically diabetic mouse.15 This evidence leads to the hypothesis that Epo may provide an effective noninvasive strategy to enhance reendothelialization of injured vessels.
Several studies have shown that the exogenous administration of cytokines increases the number of circulating EPCs. For example, pretreatment with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) was reported to double the number of circulating EPCs in humans,16,17 and the administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) recruited EPCs from BM.17 Mobilization of the circulating EPCs by exogenous G-CSF facilitates reendothelialization and inhibits neointimal development.18
In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of short-term Epo treatment as a strategy for promoting reendothelialization followed by the inhibition of neointimal hyperplasia in wire-injured arteries. Our results show that only 3-day treatment with Epo causes mobilization of circulating CD45dim/Flk-1+ or Sca1+/Flk-1+ EPCs and stimulates both differentiation of BM-derived EPCs on the endothelial layer and proliferation of resident ECs associated with endothelial EpoR-mediated activation of the Akt-eNOS pathway and SMC antiapoptotic effect, resulting in a marked inhibition of neointimal formation.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The dose of Epo was determined based on the previous report.13 The injured arteries were harvested at day 14 and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde. Paraffin-embedded sections were stained with Elastica van Gieson. Three sections from each artery at 300-µm intervals were analyzed using ImageJ 1.32j software (NIH). In other animals, Evans blue dye (5%; Sigma) was transfused to mice 10 minutes before euthanasia to identify the remaining denuded area 5 and 14 days after wire injury. After removal, arterial tissues were longitudinally opened and then placed on slide glasses to take pictures under microscope (MS5 Olympus). All animal procedures were approved by institutional guidelines. The collection of blood samples and the consent protocol for the volunters was approved by institutional guidelines.
Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting
PB (100 µL) was collected 3 days after injury and incubated for 15 minutes with anti-mouse CD34fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC), Flk-1-PE, Sca1-FITC, CD45-PECy5 antibodies (BD Pharmingen). After erythrocyte lysis, cells were analyzed with FACS Caliber (Becton Dickinson). CD45dim/Flk-1+ cells and Sca1+/Flk-1+ cells were sorted with FACS Vantage to give a culture assay and RT-PCR analysis, respectively.
Murine Cell Culture Assay
The sorted CD45dim/Flk-1+ cells were cultured with EBM-2 medium supplemented with 5% FBS, EGM-2-MV-SingleQuots (Clonetics), and 10 ng/mL VEGF (Peprotech) on fibronectin-coated chamber slides (Becton Dickinson). Adherent cells were reseeded after 4 days and maintained for 7 days. The culture cells were incubated with 2.4 µL/mL Alexa Fluor 594-labeled acetylated LDL (acLDL) (Molecular Probes) for 120 minutes, fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde, and incubated with 10 ng/mL of BS-1-FITC (Sigma) for 1 hour, and double-fluorescent cells were counted as EPCs in 4 randomly selected fields under confocal microscopy (FLUOVIEW BX50; Olympus).
Immunohistochemistry
Arteries were harvested on day 14 and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde. Paraffin cross-sections were stained with antibodies against CD31 (sc-8306; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and EpoR (sc-5624 or sc-697) followed by the avidin-biotin complex technique and diaminobenzidine substrate (Vector Laboratories). Sections were counterstained with hematoxylin. Frozen sections were stained with antibodies (GFP-Alexa Fluor 488, Molecular Probes; CD31-PE, BD Pharmingen), followed by Alexa Fluor 633conjugated anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody (Molecular Probes), and then observed under the confocal microscopy. The number of fluorescent cells from 6 sections was evaluated statistically.
To detect apoptotic cells in situ, TdT-mediated dUTP-biotin nick end labeling (TUNEL) staining was performed for paraffin sections using the In-Situ Cell Death Detection Kit (Chemicon International Inc) and counterstained with methyl green.
BM Transplantation
GFP transgenic mice were generously provided from Dr Okabe (Osaka University).20 ROSA mice21 were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, Me). GFP- or ß-galactosidase-overexpressing BM cells (5x106) were transfused to recipient mice 24 hours after 9 Gray irradiation. Six weeks after transplantation, they were subjected to vascular injury. Subsequently, at day 14 after injury, mice were examined.
Human Cell Isolation and Culture
PB was obtained. PB MNCs from venous blood of healthy human volunteers were isolated by density-gradient centrifugation (Lymphoprep; Axis Shield). CD133+ progenitor cells were purified from PB MNCs by positive selection with anti-CD133+ microbeads respectively using magnetic cell sorter device (Miltenyi Biotec). The purity of sorted cells assessed by fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS) analysis was grater than 90%. The CD133+ progenitor cells were cultured in EBM-2 medium supplemented with 5% FBS, EGM-2-MV-SingleQuots (Clonetics) a day before analysis, as described below. All cells were maintained at 37°C in a humidified incubator at 5% CO2. After serum starved in DMEM supplemented with 0.5% FBS for 12 hours, they were stimulated with 1.2IU/mL of Epo for 30 minutes and fixed. Immunofluorescence was performed by using antibodies against EpoR (sc-5624; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) with phosphorylated Akt and eNOS (Cell Signaling Technology). For double staining, we used Zenon rabbit IgG labeling kits (Molecular Probes) only when needed.
For measurement of the intracellular NO level, the cells were loaded with 4-amino-5-methylamino-2',7'-difluorofluorescein diacetate (DAF-FM DA) (10 µmol/L; Daiichi Pure Chemicals, Tokyo, Japan) for 30 minutes at 37°C in the dark, washed twice with buffer, incubated for another 30 minutes, and then visualized under laser microscopy.
Fluorescent intensity was evaluated with Adobe Photoshop software.
Measurement of NOx Concentration
NOx concentration in the serum was measured with a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) Griess system, as previously described.22
Statistics
Statistical analyses were performed with 1-way ANOVA followed by pair-wise contrasts using the Dunnetts test. Data are expressed as means±SE for continuous variables. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
As the involvement of NO in the neointimal hyperplasia has been reported,23 we next examined the effect of L-NAME on the Epo-mediated inhibition. Seven-day pretreatment with L-NAME significantly aggravated the neointimal hyperplasia in the saline-treated control mice (31%, n=10, P<0.05), consistent with the previous reports using eNOS-null mice.24 Interestingly, L-NAME completely abolished Epo-mediated inhibitory effect on the neointimal hyperplasia (I/M ratio;1.61±0.38 versus 0.63±0.15 in the Epo-treat mice, P<0.05, n=10 each) (Figure 1A and 1B), suggesting the involvement of NO in Epo-mediated action. Furthermore, treatment with the NO donor L-arginine reduced the neointimal area to the level comparable to the Epo-treated mice (Figure 1A and 1B).
To confirm that the Epo-mediated inhibition of the neointimal formation is eNOS/NO dependent, we performed the arterial injury in the eNOS-null mice. The neointimal formation in the Epo-treated eNOS-null mice was aggravated (2.8-fold, n=7, P<0.005) compared with that of the Epo-treated wild-type mice, which was similar to the level in the Epo plus L-NAME-treated mice (2.9-fold, n=10, P<0.005) (Figure 1A and 1B).
The hemoglobin value was significantly higher after Epo treatment than that of the saline-treated controls (12.6±0.4 versus 14.0±0.1 g/dL at day 9, n=15, P<0.05). The number of white blood cells reached a peak on day 2 in both groups and was significantly higher in the Epo-treated mice (18 600±2020 versus 10 200±1100 cells/µL of control, n=15, P<0.05). The platelet number was similar in both groups on days 2 and 9.
Epo Promotes Reendothelialization
Evans blue dye was administered premortem to stain the nonendothelialized areas 5 and 14 days after injury. Nonendothelialized lesions are marked by blue staining, whereas the reendothelialized area appears white (Figure 2A). At both time points, the reendothelialized area in the Epo-treated group was significantly larger than that in the saline-treated group (1.4- and 1.8-fold on day 5 and -14, n=6, respectively) (Figure 2A). Immunostaining with anti-CD31 antibody in transverse sections revealed that the proportion of CD31+ length to total lumen surface was 1.4-fold greater in the Epo-treated mice (n=10, P<0.05) (Figure 2B), consistent with the result from Evans Blue dye experiment. Furthermore, the NO dependency of the Epo-promoted reendothelialization was evaluated. The CD31+ endothelial area in the total lumen length in the Epo plus L-NAME-treated mice was 65% lower than that in the Epo-treated mice (n=10, P<0.01) and similar to the saline-treated control mice (Figure 2B).
|
Epo Facilitates Mobilization of EPCs
CD45dim cells were gated from PB MNCs and subsequently analyzed for the expression of endothelial lineage markers, Flk-1 and CD34. Three-day Epo treatment mobilized the CD45dim cells into circulation (Figure 3A), and the ratio of CD45dim/Flk-1+ cells to total PB MNCs increased to 7.4-fold (n=5 each, P<0.05) (Figure 3A, right). We further investigated the effect of L-NAME pretreatment on the Epo-mediated mobilization of EPCs using anti-Sca1 and anti-Flk-1 antibodies. The number of circulating Sca1+/Flk-1+ cells in the control group was markedly increased than the basal level (2-fold, n=6, P<0.05), whereas in the L-NAME-treated group, the Epo-mediated mobilization was completely inhibited (Figure 3B).
|
To confirm the endothelial property of CD45dim/Flk-1+ cells, we cultured them for 7 days in EGM medium with 10 ng/mL VEGF, and the EC-specific function was examined. Confocal microscopy demonstrated that 93±5% of cultured CD45dim/Flk-1+ cells were bound to FITC-conjugated BS-1 lectin and incorporated DiI-labeled acLDL, a commonly used identifier of endothelial lineage cells (Figure 3C). To evaluate the number of circulating EPCs, PB MNCs were isolated 3 days after Epo or saline treatment and cultured for 7 days. The relative numbers of BS-1 lectin+/acLDL+ cells from Epo-treated mice were 5.2±0.5-fold higher (n=5, P<0.02) than that in the saline-injected control (Figure 3D).
Antiapoptotic Effect on Medial SMC After Vascular Wire Injury
The procedure of wire injury of mouse femoral artery causes complete removal of endothelium, resulting in rapid apoptosis of medial SMCs that enhances neointimal hyperplasia.19,25 Inhibition of this burst apoptosis is reported to be a preventive effect on neointimal hyperplasia.26 Figure 3E shows that at 2 and 4 hours after injury, the number of TUNEL-positive apoptotic cells in the Epo-treated artery was significantly (P<0.05) decreased to 25% and 39% of the saline-treated controls, respectively. L-NAME treatment did not affect the Epo-mediated protection of VSMC apoptosis. Considering that the endothelium was completely removed by wire injury and the expression of EpoR in the EC-denuded artery was detected by RT-PCR analysis (unpublished observation, 2006), these findings suggest that Epo directly affects the apoptosis of VSMCs after wire injury. Interestingly, at 6 hours after injury, the number of apoptotic cell in the Epo-treated mice was increased to the level similar to the saline-treated mice, suggesting that Epo treatment did not prevent, but shifted, the apoptosis of VSMCs after wire injury.
The biological effects of Epo in the injured artery may be attributable to Epo-induced increase in circulating NO pool produced by the remote endothelial cells. Plasma NOx concentrations at 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours and 1, 3, and 14 days after injury of the Epo-treated mice were similar to those of the control mice (day 1: 54.3±8.6 versus 57.2±9.7; day 3: 58.6±9.6 versus 55.3±10.2; day 14: 59.6±4.6 versus 60.8±6.5 µmol/L; n=7 each). The expression levels for eNOS and EpoR in the lung and carotid artery at the same time points were comparable with the control mice when assessed by Western blotting and RT-PCR analysis, respectively (data not shown). These findings suggest that Epo-mediated action unlikely results from the nonspecific increase in circulating NO pool.
Analysis by BM Replacement Model
We further examined whether Epo actually induces the incorporation of marrow-derived EPCs into the regenerated endothelium by transplanting GFP-overexpressing or ß-galactosidase BM cells to the BM-ablated background mice. Six weeks after transplantation, 96±2% and 94±3% of PB MNCs were replaced, respectively (n=5 each; FACS data not shown). The mice that received vascular injury were examined on day 14. GFP+ and ß-Gal+ cells were patchily detected in the endothelial layer, and double-fluorescence immunohistochemistry (Figure 4A and 4B) disclosed a significant increase in the GFP+/CD31+ and ß-Gal+/CD31+ lesions (2.7- and 2.2-fold, respectively, P<0.05) in Epo-treated mice compared with the saline-treated mice (Figure 4A and 4B). The ratio of Epo-induced GFP+ area in total CD31+ regenerated endothelium was 31±0.3% (n=5) (Figure 4A), suggesting that Epo-mediated reendothelialization is composed of differentiation of BM-derived EPCs as well as facilitated proliferation of resident ECs. In addition, the numbers of BM-derived macrophages (GFP+/MOMA2+) and vascular smooth muscle cells (GFP+/
SMA+) in the neointima of the Epo-treated mice were much lower than those of the control group (Figure 4A). GFP+/CD3+ or GFP+/B220+ cells were barely detectable in the neointima of both groups (data not shown).
|
Expression of EpoR in Epo-Treated Injured Artery
We investigated whether Epo-mobilized EPCs actually express the specific receptor for Epo (EpoR). EpoR-positive cells (brown staining, arrowheads in Figure 5A) were apparently localized on the regenerated endothelium in the Epo-treated arteries, whereas the expression of EpoR in the saline-treated injured or uninjured arteries was barely detectable.
|
The immunofluorescence study using anti-EpoR, anti-CD31, anti-CD45, and anti-
SM-actin (
SMA) antibodies revealed that CD31+ endothelial cells in Epo-treated arteries coexpressed EpoR on the endothelial layer, whereas neither CD45+ cells nor
SMA+ cells expressed EpoR (Figure 5B). We also confirmed the expression of EpoR in the BM-derived EC-like cells mobilized by Epo using the mice repopulated with GFP+ BM cells (Figure 5C). Abundant GFP+/EpoR+ cells were detected on the luminal surface in the Epo-treated injured artery, and the distribution was 2.5-fold greater than that in the saline-treated mice (P<0.05, Figure 5D).
Epo Activates Akt-eNOS Pathways and NO Production in EPCs
To investigate whether PB and BM EPCs express EpoR, Sca1+/Flk-1+ EPCs were isolated from PB and BM by FACS and subjected to RT-PCR analysis. The DNA fragment corresponding to EpoR was amplified in the predicted size (Figure 6A). We further studied whether Sca1+/Flk-1+ EPCs have the ability to activate the EpoR/Akt/eNOS pathway in response to Epo treatment. Because the PB volume obtained from the mice is too little to get the sufficient number of endothelial-lineage cells attaching on the plate, and also the attaching mice-derived cells are less spreading and less proliferative compared with the human cells, we used the human PB EPCs. The CD133+ EPCs were isolated from human PB by magnetic-associated cell sorting and primarily cultured. To study the stimulatory effect of Epo on the downstream pathway, after 12-hour serum starvation (0.5% serum), CD133+ EPCs were treated with 1.2 IU/mL Epo for 30 minutes. Double staining using anti-EpoR with anti-phosphorylated Akt or anti-phosphorylated eNOS antibodies showed that Epo markedly induced Akt-eNOS phosphorylation in EpoR-positive EPCs (Figure 6B).
|
We further measured the intracellular NO level with DAF-FM DA (10 µmol/L). NO was visualized as a green dot under laser microscopy (Figure 6C). Epo stimulation upregulated NO level to 1.7-fold higher than the untreated control level (P<0.05), whereas addition of L-NAME completely abolished this increase.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
EPCs can be harvested from PB, and intravenous transplantation of EPCs into EC-denuded vessels potentiates the recovery of endothelial integrity that causes the inhibition of neointimal hyperplasia,4,8 although cell transplantation protocols, such as the ex vivo expansion of EPCs, are technically challenging. G-CSF-induced EPCs were shown to enhance the repair of injured arteries and prevent intimal hyperplasia.18 However, it appears that the safety and feasibility of G-CSF treatment focusing on the induction of vascular occlusion in atherosclerotic lesions has not yet been established. In 12 intractable angina patients, the administration of G-CSF was associated with 2 cases of acute myocardial infarction and 1 case of cardiac death.27 There are articles reporting the induction of acute myocardial infarction and cerebral infarction in G-CSF-treated BM transplantation patients.28,29 Differentiation of G-CSF-mobilized progenitor cells into VSMC within the stented segment, induction of angiogenesis within the atherosclerotic lesion, and aggregation of mobilized inflammatory cells within the plaque may be plausible explanations.
This study showed that short-term (3-day) treatment with Epo after EC-denuded injury leads to accelerated reendothelialization and marked inhibition of neointimal formation. Figure 2A demonstrates that the ratio of reendothelialization by Epo and saline treatment is 73% and 41% on the total lumen area, respectively, whereas the coverage by CD31+ marrow-derived cells on the reendothelialized lumen area is 75% and 32%, respectively (Figure 4B), indicating that 55% of Epo-mediated reendothelialized area is derived from marrow cells, and, in the saline-treated control, 13% of reendothelialized area is marrow-derived cells. Considering that Epo-mediated EPC mobilization (Figure 3) and reendothelialization (Figure 2) are NO dependent, it is suggested that EPC release via Epo and the endothelial differentiation in the repair process is partly involved in the observed reduction of neointima. Although the mobilization of EPC might be considered unfavorable for tumor growth, multiple clinical trials have recommended the use of Epo in chemotherapy-associated anemia or for longer survival among patients with multiple myeloma.30 Thus, the safety and feasibility of Epo treatment has been established. Although it was a concern that erythropoiesis may increase the risk of thrombosis because of an elevation in blood viscosity or cause hypertension resulting from the induction of the vasoconstricting hormone endothelin-1,31 thrombosis formation at the injured lesion in the Epo-treated group was similar to the saline-injected group, and blood pressure did not increase after short-term Epo-treatment (unpublished observation, 2005). Moreover, Epo was reported to attenuate cytokine production and inflammation in tissue ischemia by targeting cell apoptosis32 or to induce cellular protection by activating Epo-EpoR signals involving Akt pathways,33 consistent with the present result (Figure 6). These antiinflammatory and antiapoptotic cytoprotection actions associated with endothelial EpoR-mediated Akt/NO signaling may also contribute to the preventive effect of Epo on the neointimal hyperplasia.
EPC-like cells were reportedly derived from more differentiated CD34+ or immature CD133+ hematopoietic stem cells, as well as from PB MNCs or CD14+ monocytes.2,8,16 These EPC-like cells lose CD45 hematopoietic markers and express endothelial markers. Our present study clearly showed that CD45dim/Flk-1+ or Sca1+/Flk-1+ EPCs were mobilized by Epo, had a functional EC-like property in vitro, and contributed to endothelial regeneration after wire-mediated injury, suggesting this cell type is an EPC-like cell responsible for Epo-induced vascular repair. Thus, Epo treatment may be a novel strategy to inhibit the neointimal hyperplasia by directly acting on the injured vessels as well as mobilizing EPCs to the neoendothelium.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Asahara T, Murohara T, Sullivan A, Silver M, van der Zee R, Li T, Witzenbichler B, Schatteman G, Isner JM. Isolation of putative progenitor endothelial cells for angiogenesis. Science. 1997; 275: 964967.
3. Asahara T, Masuda H, Takahashi T, Kalka C, Pastore C, Silver M, Kearne M, Magner M, Isner JM. Bone marrow origin of endothelial progenitor cells responsible for postnatal vasculogenesis in physiological and pathological neovascularization. Circ Res. 1999; 85: 221228.
4. Griese DP, Ehsan A, Melo LG, Kong D, Zhang L, Mann MJ, Pratt RE, Mulligan RC, Dzau VJ. Isolation and transplantation of autologous circulating endothelial cells into denuded vessels and prosthetic grafts: implications for cell-based vascular therapy. Circulation. 2003; 108: 27102715.
5. Fujiyama S, Amano K, Uehira K, Yoshida M, Nishiwaki Y, Nozawa Y, Jin D, Takai S, Miyazaki M, Egashira K, Imada T, Iwasaka T, Matsubara H. Bone marrow monocyte lineage cells adhere on injured endothelium in a monocyte chemoattractant protein-1-dependent manner and accelerate reendothelialization as endothelial progenitor cells. Circ Res. 2003; 93: 980989.
6. Werner N, Junk S, Laufs U, Link A, Walenta K, Bohm M, Nickenig G. Intravenous transfusion of endothelial progenitor cells reduces neointima formation after vascular injury. Circ Res. 2003; 93: e17e24.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Kong D, Melo LG, Mangi AA, Zhang L, Lopez-Ilasaca M, Perrella MA, Liew CC, Pratt RE, Dzau VJ. Enhanced inhibition of neointimal hyperplasia by genetically engineered endothelial progenitor cells. Circulation. 2004a; 109: 17691775.
8. Gulati R, Jevremovic D, Peterson TE, Witt TA, Kleppe LS, Mueske CS, Lerman A, Vile RG, Simari RD. Autologous culture-modified mononuclear cells confer vascular protection after arterial injury. Circulation. 2003; 108: 15201526.
9. Anagnostou A, Liu Z, Steiner M, Chin K, Lee ES, Kessimian N, Noguchi CT. Erythropoietin receptor mRNA expression in human endothelial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994; 91: 39743978.
10. Anagnostou A, Lee ES, Kessimian N, Levinson R, Steiner M. Erythropoietin has a mitogenic and positive chemotactic effect on endothelial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990; 87: 59785982.
11. Carlini RG, Alonzo EJ, Dominguez J, Blanca I, Weisinger JR, Rothstein M, Bellorin-Font E. Effect of recombinant human erythropoietin on endothelial cell apoptosis. Kidney Int. 1999; 55: 546553.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Beleslin-Cokic BB, Cokic VP, Yu X, Weksler BB, Schechter AN, Noguchi CT. Erythropoietin and hypoxia stimulate erythropoietin receptor and nitric oxide production by endothelial cells. Blood. 2004; 103: 921926.
13. Heeschen C, Aicher A, Lehmann R, Fichtlscherer S, Vasa M, Urbich C, Mildner-Rihm C, Martin H, Zeiher AM, Dimmeler S. Erythropoietin is a potent physiologic stimulus for endothelial progenitor cell mobilization. Blood. 2003; 102: 13401346.
14. Ribatti D, Presta M, Vacca A, Ria R, Giuliani R, DellEra P, Nico B, Roncali L, Dammacco F. Human erythropoietin induces a pro-angiogenic phenotype in cultured endothelial cells and stimulates neovascularization in vivo. Blood. 1999; 93: 26272636.
15. Galeano M, Altavilla D, Cucinotta D, Russo GT, Calo M, Bitto A, Marini H, Marini R, Adamo EB, Seminara P, Minutoli L, Torre V, Squadrito F. Recombinant human erythropoietin stimulates angiogenesis and wound healing in the genetically diabetic mouse. Diabetes. 2004; 53: 25092517.
16. Kalka C, Masuda H, Takahashi T, Gordon R, Tepper O, Gravereaux E, Pieczek A, Iwaguro H, Hayashi SI, Isner JM, Asahara T. Vascular endothelial growth factor165 gene transfer augments circulating endothelial progenitor cells in human subjects. Circ Res. 2000; 86: 11981202.
17. Kocher AA, Schuster MD, Szabolcs MJ, Takuma S, Burkhoff D, Wang J, Homma S, Edwards NM, Itescu S. Neovascularization of ischemic myocardium by human bone-marrow-derived angioblasts prevents cardiomyocyte apoptosis, reduces remodeling and improves cardiac function. Nat Med. 2001; 7: 430436.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Kong D, Melo LG, Gnecchi M, Zhang L, Mostoslavsky G, Liew CC, Pratt RE, Dzau VJ. Cytokine-induced mobilization of circulating endothelial progenitor cells enhances repair of injured arteries. Circulation. 2004b; 110: 20392046.
19. Sata M, Saiura A, Kunisato A, Tojo A, Okada S, Tokuhisa T, Hirai H, Makuuchi M, Hirata Y, Nagai R. Hematopoietic stem cells differentiate into vascular cells that participate in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Nat Med. 2002; 8: 403409.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Okabe M, Ikawa M, Kominami K, Nakanishi T, Nishimune Y. Green mice as a source of ubiquitous green cells. FEBS Lett. 1997; 407: 313319.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Zambrowicz BP, Imamoto A, Fiering S, Herzenberg LA, Kerr WG, Soriano P. Disruption of overlapping transcripts in the ROSA beta geo 26 gene trap strain leads to widespread expression of beta-galactosidase in mouse embryos and hematopoietic cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997; 94: 37893794.
22. Hori T, Matsubara T, Ishibashi T, Yamazoe M, Ida T, Higuchi K, Takemoto M, Ochiai S, Tamura Y, Aizawa Y, Nishio M. Decrease of nitric oxide end-products during coronary circulation reflects elevated basal coronary artery tone in patients with vasospastic angina. Jpn Heart J. 2000; 41: 583595.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Urbich C, Heeschen C, Aicher A, Sasaki K, Bruhl T, Farhadi MR, Vajkoczy P, Hofmann WK, Peters C, Pennacchio LA, Abolmaali ND, Chavakis E, Reinheckel T, Zeiher AM, Dimmeler S. Relevance of monocytic features for neovascularization capacity of circulating endothelial progenitor cells. Circulation. 2003; 108: 25112516.
24. Moroi M, Zhang L, Yasuda T, Virmani R, Gold HK, Fishman MC, Huang PL. Interaction of genetic deficiency of endothelial nitric oxide, gender, and pregnancy in vascular response to injury in mice. J Clin Invest. 1998; 101: 12251232.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Sata M, Maejima Y, Adachi F, Fukino K, Saiura A, Sugiura S, Aoyagi T, Imai Y, Kurihara H, Kimura K, Omata M, Makuuchi M, Hirata Y, Nagai R. A mouse model of vascular injury that induces rapid onset of medial cell apoptosis followed by reproducible neointimal hyperplasia. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2000; 32: 20972104.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Beohar N, Flaherty JD, Davidson CJ, Maynard RC, Robbins JD, Shah AP, Choi JW, MacDonald LA, Jorgensen JP, Pinto JV, Chandra S, Klaus HM, Wang NC, Harris KR, Decker R, Bonow RO. Antirestenotic effects of a locally delivered caspase inhibitor in a balloon injury model. Circulation. 2004; 109: 108113.
27. Hill JM, Syed MA, Arai AE, Powell TM, Paul JD, Zalos G, Read EJ, Khuu HM, Leitman SF, Horne M, Csako G, Dunbar CE, Waclawiw MA, Cannon RO 3rd. Outcomes and risks of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; 46: 16431648.
28. Fukumoto Y, Miyamoto T, Okamura T, Inaba S, Harada M, Niho Y. Angina pectoris occurring during granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-combined preparatory regimen for autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in a patient with acute myelogenous leukaemia. Br J Haematol. 1997; 97: 666668.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Kawachi Y, Watanabe A, Kurooka N, Setsu K. Acute arterial thrombosis due to platelet aggregation in a patient receiving granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Br J Haematol. 1996; 94: 413416.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Rizzo JD, Lichtin AE, Woolf SH, Seidenfeld J, Bennett CL, Regan DH, Browman GP, Gordon MS; American Society of Clinical Oncology; American Society of Hematology. Use of epoetin in patients with cancer: evidence-based clinical practice guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the American Society of Hematology. Blood. 2002; 100: 23032320.
31. Vogel V, Kramer HJ, Backer A, Meyer-Lehnert H, Jelkmann W, Fandrey J. Effects of erythropoietin on endothelin-1 synthesis and the cellular calcium messenger system in vascular endothelial cells. Am J Hypertens. 1997; 10: 289296.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Genc S, Koroglu TF, Genc K. Erythropoietin as a novel neuroprotectant. Res Neurol Neurosci. 2004; 22: 105119.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Chong ZZ, Kang JQ, Maiese K. Erythropoietin is a novel vascular protectant through activation of Akt1 and mitochondrial modulation of cysteine proteases. Circulation. 2002; 106: 29732979.
Related Article:
Circ. Res. 2006 98: 1341-1343.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. Tsubakimoto, H. Yamada, H. Yokoi, S. Kishida, H. Takata, H. Kawahito, A. Matsui, N. Urao, Y. Nozawa, H. Hirai, et al. Bone Marrow Angiotensin AT1 Receptor Regulates Differentiation of Monocyte Lineage Progenitors From Hematopoietic Stem Cells Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, October 1, 2009; 29(10): 1529 - 1536. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Schroder, A. Kohnen, A. Aicher, E. A. Liehn, T. Buchse, S. Stein, C. Weber, S. Dimmeler, and R. P. Brandes NADPH Oxidase Nox2 Is Required for Hypoxia-Induced Mobilization of Endothelial Progenitor Cells Circ. Res., September 11, 2009; 105(6): 537 - 544. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Jia, R. Warin, X. Yu, R. Epstein, and C. T. Noguchi Erythropoietin signaling promotes transplanted progenitor cell survival FASEB J, September 1, 2009; 23(9): 3089 - 3099. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Smith, D. Semple, S. Bhandari, and A.-M. L. Seymour Cellular basis of uraemic cardiomyopathy: a role for erythropoietin? Eur J Heart Fail, August 1, 2009; 11(8): 732 - 738. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. R. Moreno, J. Sanz, and V. Fuster Promoting Mechanisms of Vascular Health: Circulating Progenitor Cells, Angiogenesis, and Reverse Cholesterol Transport J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 23, 2009; 53(25): 2315 - 2323. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Heringer-Walther, K. Eckert, S.-M. Schumacher, L. Uharek, A. Wulf-Goldenberg, F. Gembardt, I. Fichtner, H.-P. Schultheiss, K. Rodgers, and T. Walther Angiotensin-(1-7) stimulates hematopoietic progenitor cells in vitro and in vivo Haematologica, June 1, 2009; 94(6): 857 - 860. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Feng, M. van Eck, E. Van Craeyveld, F. Jacobs, V. Carlier, S. Van Linthout, M. Erdel, M. Tjwa, and B. De Geest Critical role of scavenger receptor-BI-expressing bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells in the attenuation of allograft vasculopathy after human apo A-I transfer Blood, January 15, 2009; 113(3): 755 - 764. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Spyridopoulos, S. Fichtlscherer, R. Popp, S. W. Toennes, B. Fisslthaler, T. Trepels, A. Zernecke, E. A. Liehn, C. Weber, A. M. Zeiher, et al. Caffeine Enhances Endothelial Repair by an AMPK-Dependent Mechanism Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, November 1, 2008; 28(11): 1967 - 1974. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Schober Chemokines in Vascular Dysfunction and Remodeling Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, November 1, 2008; 28(11): 1950 - 1959. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. M. T. Hare, A. K. Y. Tsui, A. T. McLaren, T. E. Ragoonanan, J. Yu, and C. D. Mazer Anemia and Cerebral Outcomes: Many Questions, Fewer Answers Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2008; 107(4): 1356 - 1370. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Surdacki, E. Marewicz, E. Wieteska, G. Szastak, T. Rakowski, E. Wieczorek-Surdacka, D. Dudek, J. Pryjma, and J. S. Dubiel Association between endothelial progenitor cell depletion in blood and mild-to-moderate renal insufficiency in stable angina Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., July 1, 2008; 23(7): 2265 - 2273. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. V. d'Uscio and Z. S. Katusic Erythropoietin Increases Endothelial Biosynthesis of Tetrahydrobiopterin by Activation of Protein Kinase B{alpha}/Akt1 Hypertension, July 1, 2008; 52(1): 93 - 99. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Zampetaki, J. P. Kirton, and Q. Xu Vascular repair by endothelial progenitor cells Cardiovasc Res, June 1, 2008; 78(3): 413 - 421. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. van Albada, G. J. du Marchie Sarvaas, J. Koster, M. C. Houwertjes, R. M. F. Berger, and R. G. Schoemaker Effects of erythropoietin on advanced pulmonary vascular remodelling Eur. Respir. J., January 1, 2008; 31(1): 126 - 134. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Lipsic, B. D. Westenbrink, P. van der Meer, P. van der Harst, A. A. Voors, D. J. van Veldhuisen, R. G. Schoemaker, and W. H. van Gilst Low-dose erythropoietin improves cardiac function in experimental heart failure without increasing haematocrit Eur J Heart Fail, January 1, 2008; 10(1): 22 - 29. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. K. Reddy, J. K. Vasir, G. V. Hegde, S. S. Joshi, and V. Labhasetwar Erythropoietin Induces Excessive Neointima Formation: A Study in a Rat Carotid Artery Model of Vascular Injury Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, September 1, 2007; 12(3): 237 - 247. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. D. Westenbrink, E. Lipsic, P. van der Meer, P. van der Harst, H. Oeseburg, G. J. Du Marchie Sarvaas, J. Koster, A. A. Voors, D. J. van Veldhuisen, W. H. van Gilst, et al. Erythropoietin improves cardiac function through endothelial progenitor cell and vascular endothelial growth factor mediated neovascularization Eur. Heart J., August 2, 2007; 28(16): 2018 - 2027. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Lee, J. S. Lee, and J. Y. Lee Prevention of Erythropoietin-Associated Hypertension Hypertension, August 1, 2007; 50(2): 439 - 445. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M Cubbon, A. Rajwani, and S. B Wheatcroft The impact of insulin resistance on endothelial function, progenitor cells and repair Diabetes and Vascular Disease Research, June 1, 2007; 4(2): 103 - 111. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-H. Chen, S.-J. Lin, F.-Y. Lin, T.-C. Wu, C.-R. Tsao, P.-H. Huang, P.-L. Liu, Y.-L. Chen, and J.-W. Chen High Glucose Impairs Early and Late Endothelial Progenitor Cells by Modifying Nitric Oxide-Related but Not Oxidative Stress-Mediated Mechanisms Diabetes, June 1, 2007; 56(6): 1559 - 1568. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Balasubramaniam, C. F. Mervis, A. M. Maxey, N. E. Markham, and S. H. Abman Hyperoxia reduces bone marrow, circulating, and lung endothelial progenitor cells in the developing lung: implications for the pathogenesis of bronchopulmonary dysplasia Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, May 1, 2007; 292(5): L1073 - L1084. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. V. d'Uscio, L. A. Smith, A. V. Santhanam, D. Richardson, K. A. Nath, and Z. S. Katusic Essential Role of Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase in Vascular Effects of Erythropoietin Hypertension, May 1, 2007; 49(5): 1142 - 1148. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Madeddu and C. Emanueli Switching on Reparative Angiogenesis: Essential Role of the Vascular Erythropoietin Receptor Circ. Res., March 16, 2007; 100(5): 599 - 601. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. F. Luscher, J. Steffel, F. R. Eberli, M. Joner, G. Nakazawa, F. C. Tanner, and R. Virmani Drug-Eluting Stent and Coronary Thrombosis: Biological Mechanisms and Clinical Implications Circulation, February 27, 2007; 115(8): 1051 - 1058. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. J. Kiernan and R. D. Simari Vasculoprotective Effects of Erythropoietin: New Developments and New Alternatives Circ. Res., June 9, 2006; 98(11): 1341 - 1343. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Research Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2006 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |