Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation Research
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation Research. 2006;98:1290-1298
Published online before print April 13, 2006, doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000222059.54917.ef
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
98/10/1290    most recent
01.RES.0000222059.54917.efv1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Herron, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Kentish, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Herron, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Kentish, J. C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Contractile function
Right arrow Calcium cycling/excitation-contraction coupling
Right arrow Cell biology/structural biology
Right arrowRelated Article
(Circulation Research. 2006;98:1290.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.


Cellular Biology

Activation of Myocardial Contraction by the N-Terminal Domains of Myosin Binding Protein-C

Todd J. Herron, Elena Rostkova, Gudrun Kunst, Rajiv Chaturvedi, Mathias Gautel, Jonathan C. Kentish

From the Cardiovascular Division (T.J.H., E.R., R.C., M.G., J.C.K.), King’s College London, St. Thomas’ Campus; Department of Anaesthesia (G.K.), King’s College Hospital, Denmark Hill Campus, London; and The Randall Centre (E.R., M.G.), New Hunt’s House, King’s College London, UK. Present address for T.J.H.: Department of Molecular & Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. Present address for R.C.: Division of Cardiology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Correspondence to Jonathan C. Kentish, MA, PhD, Cardiovascular Division, King’s College London, Rayne Institute, St. Thomas’ Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, United Kingdom. E-mail jon.kentish{at}kcl.ac.uk


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Myosin binding protein-C (MyBP-C) is a poorly understood component of the thick filament in striated muscle sarcomeres. Its C terminus binds tightly to myosin, whereas the N terminus contains binding sites for myosin S2 and possibly for the thin filament. To study the role of the N-terminal domains of cardiac MyBP-C (cMyBP-C), we added human N-terminal peptide fragments to human and rodent skinned ventricular myocytes. At concentrations >10 µmol/L, the N-terminal C0C2 peptide activated force production in the absence of calcium (pCa 9). Force at the optimal concentration (80 µmol/L) of C0C2 was {approx}60% of that in maximal Ca2+ (pCa 4.5), but the rate constant of tension redevelopment (ktr) matched or exceeded (by up to 80%) that produced by Ca2+ alone. Experiments using different N-terminal peptides suggested that this activating effect of C0C2 resulted from binding by the pro/ala-rich C0-C1 linker region, rather than the terminal C0 domain. At a lower concentration (1 µmol/L), exogenous C0C2 strongly sensitized cardiac myofibrils to Ca2+ at a sarcomere length (SL) of 1.9 µm but had no significant effect at SL 2.3 µm. This differential effect caused the normal SL dependence of myofibrillar Ca2+ sensitivity to be reduced by 80% (mouse myocytes) or abolished (human myocytes) in 1 µmol/L C0C2. These results suggest that cMyBP-C provides a regulatory pathway by which the thick filament can influence the activation of the thin filament, separately from its regulation by Ca2+. Furthermore, the N-terminal region of cMyBP-C can influence the SL-tension (Frank–Starling) relationship in cardiac muscle.


Key Words: myosin binding protein C • cardiac myocytes • Ca2+ sensitization • sarcomere length • Frank–Starling mechanism


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Myosin binding protein C (MyBP-C) is a myofilament protein of the intracellular immunoglobulin/fibronectin superfamily that is located in the "C-zone" of the sarcomeric A-band in 7 to 9 transverse stripes. Mutations in cardiac MyBP-C (cMyBP-C) constitute a major cause of familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy,1 yet the functional role of cMyBP-C remains unclear.2 There is some evidence that cMyBP-C may modulate the dynamics of myocardial contraction, because in skinned myocytes from cMyBP-C knock-out mice, the speed of unloaded and loaded shortening is increased,3 and in working hearts, systole is terminated prematurely.4 In addition, during ß-adrenergic stimulation of the heart, cMyBP-C is phosphorylated at a cardiac-specific "motif" near the N terminus. The region around this "motif" binds to myosin S2, near the hinge region of myosin, but when cMyBP-C is phosphorylated, this binding is inhibited.5 This may allow myosin S1 heads to move away from the thick filament, thereby promoting the interaction of S1 with actin.6 On the other hand, in transgenic mice lacking a phosphorylatable form of troponin I, phosphorylation of cMyBP-C alone did not alter the rate of crossbridge cycling in intact muscles or the rate of relaxation in skinned muscles.7

The precise mechanism by which MyBP-C could influence actin–myosin interaction remains to be established. Recent structural evidence from skeletal muscle has suggested that the N-terminal domains of MyBP-C may bind to the thin filament,8 and it has been reported that the N-terminal cardiac C0 domain can bind to actin in solution.9 In the intact myofibril, any such interaction between MyBP-C and thin filament proteins might be expected to vary with the length of the sarcomeres: an increase in sarcomere length (SL) reduces the spacing between think and thin filaments,10 and this might be predicted to alter the likelihood of MyBP-C binding to the thin filament. Such a SL-dependent action of MyBP-C is of considerable interest because it is well established that an increase in SL enhances the Ca2+ sensitivity of the myofibrils, an effect that is largely responsible for the length–tension (Frank–Starling) relationship in cardiac muscle.10,11 Although the molecular basis for the SL dependence of Ca2+ sensitivity remains controversial, one possibility is that the smaller spacing between the thick and thin filaments increases the probability of myosin crossbridges attaching to actin at a given concentration of activator Ca2+12,13. From the above, it could be predicted that any SL-dependent actions of MyBP-C may modulate, or contribute to, the effect of SL on myofibrillar Ca2+ sensitivity.

The aim of the present study was, therefore, to investigate the contribution of the N-terminal domains of cMyBP-C to the SL-dependent regulation of contraction in cardiac muscle. Recombinant N-terminal fragments such as C0C2 (Figure 1A) were applied to human and rodent skinned cardiac myocytes, allowing the exogenous protein to access the myofilaments directly. The effects on myofibrillar force development, crossbridge kinetics, and the SL dependence of Ca2+ sensitivity were then determined. We present functional evidence for a new myosin-binding site in the N-terminal of cMyBP-C and show that the N-terminal domains may have a major impact on the magnitude of the Frank–Starling mechanism.


Figure 1
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. A, Domain organization of cardiac myosin binding protein-C. The box indicates the C0C2 fragment used in most of the experiments. B, Force recording from a mouse skinned ventricular myocyte preparation in relaxing solution (pCa 9) during and after superfusion with C0C2 peptide. The small arrows denote ktr protocols (see Figure 2). C, The relationship between C0C2 concentration and force development in skinned myocyte preparations from mouse (n=6) and human (n=4) ventricle. Mean±SD; SL{approx}2.0 µm; 18°C.

Some of these results have been presented previously in preliminary form.14


*    Materials and Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Materials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Expression of Peptides
Truncated N-terminal MyBP-C peptides were prepared by previously described methods.15,16 The cDNA was prepared based on the human MYBC3 sequence. Briefly, soluble MyBP-C fragments were expressed using a pET expression system at 20°C. Following purification the His tag was cleaved from all peptides using TEV protease. Proteins were equilibrated to relaxing (pCa 9.0) or activating solution (pCa 4.5) by dialysis before application to skinned ventricular myocytes.

Myocyte Experiments
Human ventricular biopsies were obtained from transplant donor hearts or patients undergoing corrective cardiac surgery, with full ethical permission, and were frozen in liquid nitrogen. Studies on animals were authorized under the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act, 1986. The conditions for the care and husbandry of animals were set out in the relevant Codes of Practice issued under the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act, 1986. Rats (B & K, Hull, UK) and mice (Harlan, Bicester, UK) were killed under pentobarbitone anesthesia and their ventricles were rapidly removed. Myocyte-sized fragments from the human or rodent tissue were then obtained by homogenization in ice-cold relaxing solution.12 Relaxing solution contained (in mmol/L)17: BES 100, K propionate 55, phosphocreatine 10, MgATP2– 5, Mg2+ 1, dithiothreitol 1, EGTA 10 (replaced by CaEGTA for activating solutions), AEBSF 0.5, leupeptin 0.001, E64 0.001; pH 7.1, ionic strength, 0.20 mol/L. The myocytes were skinned with 1% Triton X-100 in relaxing solution (30 minutes). Preparations consisting of 1 myocyte or a small bundle ({approx}150-µm long and {approx}35-µm wide) were mounted to a force transducer and high-speed length controller using low-compliance attachments.12,18 Isometric tension and crossbridge cycling kinetics were measured at {approx}18°C by the method of Brenner and Eisenberg19: the myocyte preparation was shortened by 20% in 1 ms and then restretched after 30 ms. This procedure detaches myosin crossbridges from actin, and the rate of tension recovery (ktr) after the restretch reflects the rate of crossbridge reattachment and transition to the force-generating state(s).19 The ktr was determined from a single-exponential fit to the force recovery trace. SL in the relaxed myocytes was computed online by Fast-Fourier analysis of the video image of the myocyte (IonOptix, Milton, Mass).

Transfection of MyBP-C Fragments
Cardiac MyBP-C fragments containing domains C0, C0-C1, C1-C2, C0-C2 were phased according to Freiburg and Gautel20 and cloned into an HA-tagged mammalian expression vector as described previously.21 The constructs were transfected into neonatal rat ventricular myocytes (which can be transfected easily, in contrast to adult myocytes) using standard procedures, and cells were maintained as described.21 The transfected cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde after 2 to 3 days in culture and stained with anti-HA tag antibody (clone 3F10, Roche), anti–myosin heavy chain (MHC) (clone A1025; a gift from S. Hughes, King’s College, London, UK), and Alexa-633 phalloidin (Molecular Probes) for visualization of F-actin. The specimens were analyzed by confocal microscopy using a Zeiss LSM-510 Meta microscope under x63 magnification and 2 to 3 times zoom.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Activating Effect of C0C2
Following the procedures in our earlier work,16 in which addition of cardiac C1C2 was found to cause a sensitization of skinned skeletal fibers to calcium, we initially used C0C2 at concentrations between 30 and 80 µmol/L. Whereas in the skeletal fibers we had found no force development at these concentrations of C0C2 if Ca2+ was absent (pCa 9), under the same conditions the cardiac myocytes showed a substantial force development (Figure 1B). After C0C2 was applied, force typically took 2 to 4 minutes to reach a new level, which presumably reflects the time taken for the peptide (molecular mass, 49 kDa) to diffuse throughout the preparation. The effect was readily reversible (Figure 1B). This activating effect showed a dose-dependent, sigmoidal relationship in both mouse and human ventricular myocytes (Figure 1C), with EC50 values of 39±4 µmol/L (mean±SD) (n=6) and 37±3 µmol/L (n=6), respectively.

To discover whether the force induced by C0C2 was attributable to normal, cycling crossbridges or to rigor crossbridges, we measured the rate of crossbridge cycling by recording the rate of tension redevelopment (ktr) following a rapid shortening–restretch maneuver.19 Figure 2 shows typical results from mouse skinned myocytes in the presence of various concentrations of C0C2 or a maximally activating concentration of Ca2+ (pCa 4.5). Maximal Ca2+ activated ktr values reported here are comparable to those previously reported for rodent ventricular myocardium at a similar temperature.22 Force redevelopment was rapid in the presence of C0C2; indeed, the ktr value in a maximally activating concentration (80 µmol/L) of C0C2 was similar to that in maximal Ca2+ (Figure 2B). The maximum force was, however, significantly smaller with C0C2 than with Ca2+. These data indicate that C0C2 initiated the cycling of active, rather than rigor, crossbridges.


Figure 2
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Differential effects of C0C2 and Ca2+ on force development and crossbridge cycling in mouse skinned ventricular myocytes. A, Length and force recordings from a mouse skinned myocyte preparation during ktr measurements. After release/restretch of the preparation, rapid tension recovery was observed when the myocyte was activated by a maximal concentration of calcium (pCa 4.5) or by various concentrations of the C0C2 fragment (at pCa 9). B, Mean results from 6 myocyte preparations (mean+SD, with results from paired t tests). C, Traces from ktr measurements during activation by Ca2+ or C0C2 in myocyte preparations with and without troponin C.

The differential effects on force and ktr suggests that C0C2 was not switching on the thin filament by exactly the same mechanism as Ca2+. This was confirmed with myocytes in which troponin C had been extracted by replacing the endogenous troponin complex with recombinant TnT-TnI.23 After this procedure, the normal activation by Ca2+ was lost, but the Ca2+-independent activation by C0C2 remained (Figure 2C).

With human myocytes (Figure 3), the ktr values were lower (presumably largely because of the presence of the slow ß-MHC rather than the fast {alpha}-MHC in mouse), but the results were similar, except that the differential effects on force and crossbridge-cycling rate were more striking. Although, once again, steady force was less with C0C2 than with maximal Ca2+ activation, ktr for human myocytes in the presence of C0C2 was faster by {approx}80% than in maximal Ca2+ (Figure 3A and 3B). To examine whether this supramaximal effect of C0C2 on crossbridge cycling persisted at different levels of myofibrillar activation, we varied force by adding different concentrations of C0C2 or Ca2+ (Figure 3C). The ktr increased with [Ca2+], as seen previously.17,24 The ktr tended to rise with increasing concentrations of C0C2, but even at a [C0C2] giving only {approx}30% activation of force, the value of ktr exceeded that at the maximal [Ca2+]. This is further evidence that C0C2 and Ca2+ activated force production by different mechanisms. The greater effect of C0C2 on ktr in human myocytes compared with mouse myocytes (Figure 2B) may be attributable to the fact that the C0C2 we used was of the human sequence, which differs by 17% from the mouse C0C2 sequence.


Figure 3
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Differential effects of C0C2 and Ca2+ on force development and crossbridge cycling in human skinned ventricular myocytes. A, Force recordings during ktr protocols with C0C2 (80µmol/L) or Ca2+ (pCa 4.5). B, Compared with Ca2+, 80 µmol/L C0C2 had a smaller activating effect on force production but a greater effect on ktr (mean+SD) (n=6). C, Force production and crossbridge cycling at various levels of myofibrillar activation (produced by altering the concentration of C0C2 or Ca2+). Results are normalized to the force and ktr recorded at pCa 4.5. Mean±SD; n=6.

Activation by Different N-Terminal MyBP-C Peptides
To investigate which regions of C0C2 were required for its activating effect, we expressed different N-terminal truncated peptides of cMyBP-C and applied them to human and rodent skinned myocytes (Figure 4). The C0C1 fragment (30 µmol/L) acted like C0C2 to promote force and crossbridge cycling in the absence of Ca2+, although unlike C0C2, maximal force was the same as with Ca2+ activation. In contrast, the C1C2 fragment activated neither force nor crossbridge cycling, as noted previously.25 Similarly, C0 was without activating effect on force or ktr. A summary of the activating effects (Figure 4D) illustrates that the critical sequence for this Ca2+-independent activation appeared to be the pro/ala-rich linker between the C0 and C1 domains.


Figure 4
View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Effects of various N-terminal MyBP-C fragments (all 30 µmol/L) on force dynamics in human skinned ventricular myocytes. A, Like C0C2, the C0C1 fragment activated force and rapid crossbridge cycling. B and C, Force and crossbridge cycling were activated by C0C2 and C0C1 but not by C0, C1C2, or the N-terminal domain of slow skeletal muscle (sNC2). D, Summary showing the activating effect ({checkmark}) of the various fragments.

Localization of the MyBP-C Peptides
To help identify the proteins that were binding the MyBP-C fragments, we expressed C0C1 and C0C2 in transfected neonatal rat cardiac myocytes (Figure 5). Antibodies specific for these fragments exhibited a striated staining pattern, with C0C1 and C0C2 localized predominantly to the A-band (although there was some fainter, diffuse cytosolic staining, suggesting an unbound fraction). At higher magnification (inset), there was clear indication that these fragments were binding most strongly to the A-band region that contains myosin heads, rather than to the H-zone, which consists of the myosin backbone only. There was no evidence for binding of C0C1 or C0C2 to proteins of the I-band.


Figure 5
View larger version (79K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Neonatal rat cardiac myocytes after transfection with C0C1 (A) or C0C2 (B) and stained for these fragments (red) or for MHC (green) or F-actin (blue). The center of the A-band (comprising H- and M-band) is marked by an arrowhead. Inserts show x3 magnified areas of the panels and demonstrate clear colocalization of the transfected MyBP-C fragments with myosin (yellow in overlay, left panels) but not with actin.

C0C2 Reduces the SL Dependence of Ca2+ Sensitivity
Previous reports have shown that the Ca2+ sensitivity of cardiac myofibrils is increased by low concentrations (a few micromolar) of fragments C09 or C1C2.25 To see whether the same was true for C0C2, and to study the SL dependence of any effect, we measured myofibrillar Ca2+ sensitivity in the presence of 1 µmol/L C0C2 (a concentration which does not activate force directly at pCa 9; Figure 1) at SLs of 1.9 and 2.3 µm, which span the normal range of diastolic SL in the heart.11 Figure 6 illustrates that raising the SL from 1.9 µm to 2.3 µm increased the Ca2+ sensitivity (as measured by the pCa for 50% force, pCa50) in human skinned myocytes by 0.13 pCa50 units, consistent with previous studies.26 Mouse myocytes showed a greater SL dependence of Ca2+ sensitivity (results for both species are summarized in Figure 8). As illustrated in Figure 7, the addition of the C0C2 peptide (1 µmol/L) at a submaximal Ca2+ concentration (here pCa 5.6) produced a large increase in force at SL=1.9 µm SL (Figure 7A), but at SL=2.3 µm there was no effect (Figure 7B). This SL-dependent action was seen over the entire range of Ca2+ concentrations. Thus there was a pronounced Ca2+ sensitization by C0C2 at 1.9 µm SL (Figure 7C), increasing pCa50 by 0.29±0.08 pCa units (n=7), whereas there was no significant effect on Ca2+ sensitivity at 2.3 µm SL (Figure 7D; increase in pCa50=0.07±0.03). There was no significant effect of C0C2 on maximum Ca2+ activated force at either SL (results not shown).


Figure 6
View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. SL dependence of myofibrillar Ca2+ sensitivity in human skinned myocytes. A and B, Video images of a human ventricular preparation at two different SLs. B and C, Force–Ca2+ relationships at SL 1.9 µm and 2.3 µm. Mean±SD; n=10.


Figure 7
View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. SL dependence of myofibrillar Ca2+ sensitivity in the absence and presence of C0C2. A and B, Representative force recordings from a submaximally calcium-activated (pCa=5.6) human ventricular myocyte in the absence and presence of C0C2 (1 µmol/L). C and D, Mean force–[Ca2+] relationships for human myocytes at the 2 SLs. Mean±SD; n=6 (long SL) and n=10 (short SL) myocytes.

The mean results for human and mouse myocytes (Figure 8A) show that in both species, the large Ca2+ sensitizing action of 1 µmol/L C0C2 at SL=1.9 µm was abolished at 2.3 µm. It followed from this that the normal SL dependence of myofibrillar Ca2+ sensitivity (eg, Figure 6) would be different in the absence and presence of C0C2. In Figure 8B, we replot the data to show how the presence of C0C2 altered the SL dependence of myofibrillar Ca2+ sensitivity. The increase in pCa50 (0.13±0.04) seen when the SL was increased from 1.9 µm to 2.3 µm in human myocytes was, in fact, completely abolished by the addition of C0C2; the corresponding stretch-induced increase in pCa50 in mouse myocytes was larger (0.23±0.05) than in human myocytes but was reduced to only {approx}20% of this value if C0C2 was present. Thus the exogenous N-terminal fragment of MyBP-C had profound inhibitory effects on the SL dependence of myofibrillar Ca2+ sensitivity.


Figure 8
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 8. Summary of the effects of SL and C0C2 (1 µmol/L) on myofibrillar Ca2+ sensitivity. A, The increase in calcium sensitivity produced by C0C2 at SL 1.9 µm but not at 2.3 µm was observed in both mouse (n=6) and human (n=7) skinned myocytes. B, In the presence of the C0C2 fragment, the usual SL dependence of calcium sensitivity was abolished in human ventricular myocytes and reduced greatly in mouse ventricular myocytes.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
In the present work, we show that N-terminal fragments of cMyBP-C can affect force production and crossbridge activity in skinned myocyte preparations from rodent and human ventricles in a previously unrecognized way. At concentrations >10 µmol/L, C0C2 (and C0C1) induced a Ca2+-independent activation of crossbridge cycling and force development. At a lower concentration (1 µmol/L), C0C2 increased myofibrillar Ca2+ sensitivity at a SL of 1.9 µm, but this effect was absent at 2.3 µm; this caused the normal SL dependence of myofibrillar Ca2+ sensitivity to be virtually abolished in the presence of C0C2. This SL-dependent effect suggests that MyBP-C may modulate the SL dependence of myofibrillar Ca2+ sensitivity.

Activation of Crossbridge Cycling in the Absence of Ca2+
Although it is commonly accepted that Ca2+ is required to switch on crossbridge cycling and force development, we found that the addition of C0C2 or C0C1 at concentrations above 10 µmol/L induced a large activation of force development in the virtual absence of Ca2+ (pCa 9). To our knowledge, this is the first report that a thick filament protein (other than myosin S1 when [MgATP] is low) can switch on crossbridge cycling in the absence of Ca2+. This action was not seen in previous studies using N-terminal fragments of cMyBP-C, but these studies used fragments containing either C09 or C1C2,25 neither of which exhibit this Ca2+-independent activation (Figure 4). One similarity between activation by C0C2 and Ca2+ was that the relationship between force and [C0C2] was sigmoidal (Figure 1), as it is for Ca2+. Compared with the normal activation by Ca2+, however, the activation by C0C2 achieved a smaller maximum force but a similar or even supramaximal rate of crossbridge cycling (Figure 2 and 3Up). In addition, the activating effect of C0C2 also occurred in TnC-extracted preparations, in which Ca2+ activation was abolished (Figure 2C). These differential effects suggest that C0C2 was switching on the thin filament by mechanism different from that of Ca2+. In terms of the apparent rates of crossbridge attachment (fapp) and detachment (gapp) in a 2-state model of the crossbridge cycle,19 the actions of C0C2 on force and ktr (which is proportional to fapp+gapp) may be explained if C0C2 not only increases fapp, as Ca2+ does,19 but also increases gapp (thereby tending to increase ktr but decrease force).

Because only approximately one-third of myosin molecules (ie, those in the C-zone of the sarcomere) have endogenous cMyBP-C bound, it is likely that the exogenous cMyBP-C fragments were activating contraction by binding to vacant cMyBP-C-binding sites and mimicking the actions of the endogenous cMyBP-C, rather than by competing with endogenous cMyBP-C for its usual binding sites. If the activation was being caused by a competition effect, then the endogenous cMyBP-C would have to be exerting a strong inhibition of crossbridge activation. This seems highly unlikely, because in cMyBP-C null mice there is no maintained activation of the myofibrils if Ca2+ is absent25; in addition, adding the human C1C2 peptide increased myofibrillar Ca2+ sensitivity to the same extent in skinned myocytes from wild-type and cMyBP-C knockout mice, indicating that this could not be a competition effect.25

The results using various MyBP-C fragments (Figure 4) provide information on the critical region of cMyBP-C needed for the Ca2+-independent activation of crossbridge cycling. Whereas previous binding studies have suggested that the N-terminal region of cMyBP-C can bind to myosin S2 via the region around the cMyBP-C motif,15 or to actin via C0,9 our data suggest that neither of these domains is required for the activating effect of exogenous C0C2. The C0C1 fragment, which lacks the MyBP-C motif and does not bind myosin S2 with high affinity,15 acted like C0C2 to switch on force and crossbridge cycling (Figure 4), whereas the C1C2 fragment, which does contain the myosin S2 binding site, activated neither force nor crossbridge cycling in the absence of Ca2+, as noted previously.25 Neither did the N-terminal C0 domain itself have an activating effect (Figure 4). Rather, the critical region for activation appeared to be the pro/ala-rich linker between the C0 and C1 domains (Figure 4D). It may be noted that the C0 fragment used by Kulikovskaya et al9 contained, in fact, 54 additional residues of this pro/ala-rich linker region.

The precise mechanism for the activating effect of C0C1 and C0C2 on force production and crossbridge cycling remains to be established. Theoretically, the Ca2+-independent crossbridge cycling might be induced by the cMyBP-C fragments either binding to the thin filament and switching it on directly or binding to the thick filament to promote the attachment of myosin S1 heads to actin in sufficient numbers to activate the thin filament (as occurs during the development of rigor). The labeling studies (Figure 5) demonstrated binding of the fragments to the thick filament crossbridge region, presumably to myosin. This A-band localization is to be expected for C0C2, because the C1C2 part of this fragment contains the motif region that binds to myosin S2.15 The A-band localization of C0C1 suggests that C0C1 and C0C2 contain a novel region, presumably the pro/ala-rich sequence (Figure 4), that binds to a thick filament protein. Flavigny et al27 also found that exogenous C0C1 was restricted to the A-band and suggested that this was caused by C0 binding to myomesin-binding sites on myosin. However, the C0 fragment alone had no activating effect in our experiments (Figure 4) and localized diffusely in the transfected ventricular cells (results not shown). Interestingly, a pro/ala-rich region homologous to that in cMyBP-C is found in the N-terminal extension of the A1 type of essential light chain (ELC-1),8 as found in cardiac myosin. Recent high-resolution structural studies of thick filaments have shown interactions between the ELC bound to the neck region of one myosin S1 head and the motor domains of other S1 heads; these interactions could keep the myosin heads close to the filament backbone in the relaxed muscle.28 The N-terminal homology of cMyBP-C with ELC-1 raises the possibility that the pro/ala-rich sequence of the C0C1 domain could, by interfering with these interactions between ELC-1 and the S1 heads, free some of the heads and increase their flexibility, thereby promoting the binding of S1 to actin. This action would tend to increase myofibrillar Ca2+ sensitivity at low concentrations of cMyBP-C (Figure 7) and might account for the activation of the thin filament at higher concentrations of cMyBP-C.

The confocal images of the transfected cells suggest that C0C1 and C0C2 bind with high affinity to the thick filament. However, our data do not exclude the possibility that these cMyBP-C domains could bind additionally to the thin filament, although with much lower affinity. A direct interaction between the N-terminal regions of MyBP-C and actin was suggested by structural evidence from fish skeletal muscle8 and from binding studies with cardiac MyBP-C.9 The homologous N-terminal fragments of ELC-1 are reported to bind to actin and have been shown to alter crossbridge kinetics, raise the Ca2+ sensitivity of force in skinned fibers, and induce a supramaximal activation of Ca2+-activated actomyosin ATPase activity (reviewed by Schaub et al29). From the homology between the N-terminal regions of the proteins, it was predicted that MyBP-C could exert effects similar to ELC.8 However, binding to actin alone cannot explain the lack of thin filament binding of the cMyBP-C fragments (Figure 5), nor the muscle-type specificity that we observed: we found no activating effect of the N-terminal slow skeletal sNC2 peptide on cardiac myofibrils (Figure 4) nor of the cardiac C0C2 peptide on mouse skinned soleus fibers (not shown), yet actin is virtually identical in cardiac and slow skeletal muscle (98% amino acid identity and 100% homology) and so is unlikely to confer this pronounced muscle-type specificity.

We conclude that our data may be explained if the pro/ala-containing C0C1 sequence of cMyBP-C binds to myosin and promotes crossbridge binding to actin. A myosin-based mechanism can more readily account for the observed supramaximal stimulation of the crossbridge cycling rate (Figures 2 and 3Up). There may be additional binding of cMyBP-C to actin at higher concentrations of cMyBP-C, although this is likely to be weak and labile, as suggested previously8; nevertheless, this could aid the activation of crossbridge cycling in the absence of Ca2+. Further work is needed to clarify the binding partner(s) for these MyBP-C fragments.

SL-Dependent Sensitizing Action of C0C2
At a lower concentration (1 µmol/L), C0C2 increased the Ca2+ sensitivity of the myofibrils markedly at SL 1.9 µm, but, surprisingly, this sensitization was absent at a SL of 2.3 µm (Figure 7). A corollary of this strong interaction between the effects of C0C2 and SL on myofibrillar Ca2+ sensitivity was that this low concentration of C0C2 reduced or abolished the SL dependence of Ca2+ sensitivity (Figure 8). One possible mechanism for the SL dependence of Ca2+ sensitivity is that as the sarcomere is lengthened, the smaller spacing between thick and thin filaments enhances the probability of actin–myosin interaction.10,12 Consistent with this, interventions such as lowering the ionic strength30 or adding NEM-S1,12 which increase the number of weakly or strongly bound crossbridges interacting with actin, have been reported to reduce or abolish the SL dependence of Ca2+ sensitivity. It is postulated that, by promoting actin–myosin interaction at shorter SLs, these interventions replicate the effect of increasing SL (reviewed by Fuchs and Martyn13). It may be that C0C2 studied here has a similar action, ie, C0C2 increases myofibrillar Ca2+ sensitivity at SL=1.9 µm by binding to myosin and increasing the freedom and/or flexibility of myosin heads, allowing them to interact more readily with actin, whereas at SL=2.3 µm the spacing between S1 heads and actin is already small enough for optimal interaction, thus resulting in little further effect of adding the cMyBP-C fragment. Thus these data provide evidence that, even at low concentrations, the N-terminal region of MyBP-C can modulate the interaction of myosin with actin, probably by altering the availability of crossbridges able to interact with the thin filament. We predict that the N-terminal sequence of endogenous cMyBP-C within the myofibril may also exert a similar effect. The SL dependence of this effect suggests that endogenous cMyBP-C could potentially modulate the length–tension relationship in cardiac muscle. Consistent with this, a recent study has found a reduced SL dependence of Ca2+ sensitivity in the hearts of cMyBP-C knockout mice.31

In summary, our results provide evidence for a novel interaction between the pro/ala-rich sequence of the N-terminal cMyBP-C region and an A-band protein, almost certainly a myosin component. This N-terminal region can (at higher concentrations) activate crossbridge cycling independently of Ca2+ and (at lower concentrations) promote the Ca2+ activation of crossbridge cycling in a SL-dependent manner. In the intact myocyte, the average concentration of cMyBP-C is {approx}8 µmol/L.25 However, because cMyBP-C is localized to the sarcomeric C-zone, its local concentration will be more than double this, and thus within the range for possible Ca2+-independent activation (Figure 1). On the other hand, steric constraints on the motion of the endogenous, bound cMyBP-C would reduce the effective concentration seen by other myofibrillar proteins, perhaps to a few micromolar. Although the precise effective concentration of cMyBP-C in the sarcomeric C-zone remains uncertain, our results suggest that the N-terminal region of endogenous MyBP-C within the C-zone may function to modulate the Ca2+ activation of crossbridge cycling in cardiac myofibrils.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported by grants from the Medical Research Council (to M.G. and J.C.K.). We are grateful to E. Ehler for providing neonatal cardiomyocytes.


*    Footnotes
 
Original received November 24, 2005; revision received March 17, 2006; accepted March 31, 2006.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Richard P, Charron P, Carrier L, Ledeuil C, Cheav T, Pichereau C, Benaiche A, Isnard R, Dubourg O, Burban M, Gueffet JP, Millaire A, Desnos M, Schwartz K, Hainque B, Komajda M, for the EUROGENE Heart Failure Project. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: distribution of disease genes, spectrum of mutations, and implications for a molecular diagnosis strategy. Circulation. 2003; 107: 2227–2232.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Flashman E, Redwood C, Moolman-Smook J, Watkins H. Cardiac myosin binding protein C: its role in physiology and disease. Circ Res. 2004; 94: 1279–1289.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Korte FS, McDonald KS, Harris SP, Moss RL. Loaded shortening, power output, and rate of force redevelopment are increased with knockout of cardiac myosin binding protein-C. Circ Res. 2003; 93: 752–758.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Palmer BM, Georgakopoulos D, Janssen PM, Wang Y, Alpert NR, Belardi DF, Harris SP, Moss RL, Burgon PG, Seidman CE, Seidman JG, Maughan DW, Kass DA. Role of cardiac myosin binding protein C in sustaining left ventricular systolic stiffening. Circ Res. 2004; 94: 1249–1255.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Gruen M, Prinz H, Gautel M. cAPK-phosphorylation controls the interaction of the regulatory domain of cardiac myosin binding protein C with myosin-S2 in an on-off fashion. FEBS Lett. 1999; 453: 254–259.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Weisberg A, Winegrad S. Alteration of myosin cross bridges by phosphorylation of myosin-binding protein C in cardiac muscle. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996; 93: 8999–9003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Kentish JC, McCloskey DT, Layland J, Palmer S, Leiden JM, Martin AF, Solaro RJ. Phosphorylation of troponin-I by protein kinase A accelerates relaxation and cross-bridge cycle kinetics in mouse ventricular muscle. Circ Res. 2001; 88: 1059–1065.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Squire JM, Luther PK, Knupp C. Structural evidence for the interaction of C-protein (MyBP-C) with actin and sequence identification of a possible actin-binding domain. J Mol Biol. 2003; 331: 713–724.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Kulikovskaya I, McClellan G, Flavigny J, Carrier L, Winegrad S. Effect of MyBP-C binding to actin on contractility in heart muscle. J Gen Physiol. 2003; 122: 761–774.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Konhilas JP, Irving TC, de Tombe PP. Frank-Starling law of the heart and the cellular mechanisms of length-dependent activation. Pflugers Arch. 2002; 445: 305–310.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Allen DG, Kentish JC. The cellular basis of the length-tension relation in cardiac muscle. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1985; 17: 821–840.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. McDonald KS, Moss RL. Osmotic compression of single cardiac myocytes eliminates the reduction in Ca2+ sensitivity of tension at short sarcomere length. Circ Res. 1995; 77: 199–205.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Fuchs F, Martyn DA. Length-dependent Ca2+ activation in cardiac muscle: some remaining questions. J Muscle Res Cell Motility. 2005; 26: 199–212.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Herron TJ, Kunst G, Gautel M, Kentish JC. Regulation of skinned cardiac myocyte contractility by the N-terminal region of myosin-binding protein C. J Muscle Res Cell Motility. 2003; 24: 328 Abstract.
  15. Gruen M, Gautel M. Mutations in ß-myosin S2 that cause familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (FHC) abolish the interaction with the regulatory domain of myosin-binding protein-C. J Mol Biol. 1999; 286: 933–949.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Kunst G, Kress KR, Gruen M, Uttenweiler D, Gautel M, Fink RHA. Myosin binding protein C, a phosphorylation-dependent force regulator in muscle that controls the attachment of myosin heads by its interaction with myosin S2. Circ Res. 2000; 86: 51–58.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Palmer S, Kentish JC. Roles of Ca2+ and crossbridge kinetics in determining the maximum rates of Ca2+ activation and relaxation in rat and guinea-pig skinned trabeculae. Circ Res. 1998; 83: 179–186.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Herron TJ, Korte FS, McDonald KS. Power output is increased after phosphorylation of myofibrillar proteins in rat skinned cardiac myocytes. Circ Res. 2001; 89: 1184–1190.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Brenner B, Eisenberg E. Rate of force generation in muscle: correlation with actomyosin ATPase activity in solution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986; 83: 3542–3546.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Freiburg A, Gautel M. A molecular map of the interactions between titin and myosin-binding protein C: implications for sarcomeric assembly in familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Eur J Biochem. 1996; 235: 317–323.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Lange S, Xiang F, Yakovenko A, Vihola A, Hackman P, Rostkova E, Kristensen J, Brandmeier B, Franzen G, Hedberg B, Gunnarsson LG, Hughes SM, Marchand S, Sejersen T, Richard I, Edstrom L, Ehler E, Udd B, Gautel M. The kinase domain of titin controls muscle gene expression and protein turnover. Science. 2005; 308: 1599–1603.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Rundell VLM, Manaves V, Martin AF, de Tombe PP. Impact of ß-myosin heavy chain isoform expression on cross-bridge cycling kinetics. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2005; 288: H896–H903.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Chandra M, Kim JJ, Solaro RJ. An improved method for exchanging troponin subunits in detergent skinned rat cardiac fiber bundles. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1999; 263: 219–223.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Wolff MR, Mcdonald KS, Moss RL. Rate of tension development in cardiac muscle varies with level of activator calcium. Circ Res. 1995; 76: 154–160.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Harris SP, Rostkova E, Gautel M, Moss RL. Binding of myosin binding protein-C to myosin subfragment S2 affects contractility independent of a tether mechanism. Circ Res. 2004; 95: 930–936.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. van der Velden J, de Jong JW, Owen VJ, Burton PBJ, Stienen GJ. Effect of protein kinase A on calcium sensitivity of force and its sarcomere length dependence in human cardiomyocytes. Cardiovasc Res. 2000; 46: 487–495.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Flavigny J, Souchet M, Sebillon P, Berrebi-Bertrand I, Hainque B, Mallet A, Bril A, Schwartz K, Carrier L. COOH-terminal truncated cardiac myosin-binding protein C mutants resulting from familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy mutations exhibit altered expression and/or incorporation in fetal rat cardiomyocytes. J Mol Biol. 1999; 294: 443–456.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Woodhead JL, Zhao FQ, Craig R, Egelman EH, Alamo L, Padron R. Atomic model of a myosin filament in the relaxed state. Nature. 2005; 436: 1195–1199.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Schaub MC, Hefti MA, Zuellig RA, Morano I. Modulation of contractility in human cardiac hypertrophy by myosin essential light chain isoforms. Cardiovascular Res. 1998; 37: 381–404.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Smith SH, Fuchs F. Effect of ionic strength on length-dependent Ca2+ activation in skinned cardiac muscle. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1999; 31: 2115–2125.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Cazorla O, Szilagyi S, Vignier N, Salazar G, Kramer E, Vassort G, Carrier L, Lacampagne A. Length and protein kinase A modulations of myocytes in cardiac myosin binding protein C-deficient mice. Cardiovascular Res. 2006; 69: 370–380.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Related Article:

Myosin Binding Protein C in the Heart
Pieter P. de Tombe
Circ. Res. 2006 98: 1234-1236. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
Y. Lecarpentier, N. Vignier, P. Oliviero, A. Guellich, L. Carrier, and C. Coirault
Cardiac Myosin-Binding Protein C Modulates the Tuning of the Molecular Motor in the Heart
Biophys. J., July 15, 2008; 95(2): 720 - 728.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
T. Nagayama, E. Takimoto, S. Sadayappan, J. O. Mudd, J.G. Seidman, J. Robbins, and D. A. Kass
Control of In Vivo Contraction/Relaxation Kinetics by Myosin Binding Protein C: Protein Kinase A Phosphorylation Dependent and Independent Regulation
Circulation, November 20, 2007; 116(21): 2399 - 2408.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
L. Pohlmann, I. Kroger, N. Vignier, S. Schlossarek, E. Kramer, C. Coirault, K. R. Sultan, A. El-Armouche, S. Winegrad, T. Eschenhagen, et al.
Cardiac Myosin-Binding Protein C Is Required for Complete Relaxation in Intact Myocytes
Circ. Res., October 26, 2007; 101(9): 928 - 938.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Gen. Physiol.Home page
I. Kulikovskaya, G. B. McClellan, R. Levine, and S. Winegrad
Multiple Forms of Cardiac Myosin-binding Protein C Exist and Can Regulate Thick Filament Stability
J. Gen. Physiol., April 30, 2007; 129(5): 419 - 428.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. V. Razumova, J. F. Shaffer, A.-Y. Tu, G. V. Flint, M. Regnier, and S. P. Harris
Effects of the N-terminal Domains of Myosin Binding Protein-C in an in Vitro Motility Assay: EVIDENCE FOR LONG-LIVED CROSS-BRIDGES
J. Biol. Chem., November 24, 2006; 281(47): 35846 - 35854.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S. Sadayappan, H. Osinska, R. Klevitsky, J. N. Lorenz, M. Sargent, J. D. Molkentin, C. E. Seidman, J. G. Seidman, and J. Robbins
Cardiac myosin binding protein c phosphorylation is cardioprotective
PNAS, November 7, 2006; 103(45): 16918 - 16923.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
P. P. de Tombe
Myosin Binding Protein C in the Heart
Circ. Res., May 26, 2006; 98(10): 1234 - 1236.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
98/10/1290    most recent
01.RES.0000222059.54917.efv1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Herron, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Kentish, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Herron, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Kentish, J. C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Contractile function
Right arrow Calcium cycling/excitation-contraction coupling
Right arrow Cell biology/structural biology
Right arrowRelated Article

<