| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
UltraRapid Communications |
From the Departments of Pharmacology (A.S., W.C., M.D.) and Microbiology and Immunology (S.M.T.), State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse; and the Department of Neuroscience (H.S.D., D.C.S.), Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY.
Correspondence to Mario Delmar, MD, PhD, Department of Pharmacology SUNY Upstate Medical University 766 Irving Ave, Syracuse, NY 13210. E-mail delmarm{at}upstate.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: connexin43 gap junction pH gating
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Recently, we determined the structural characteristics of a peptide corresponding to the second half of the cytoplasmic loop of Cx43 (amino acids 119 to 144; referred to as "L2")8 and demonstrated its ability to bind to the carboxyl terminal (CT) domain of the same protein. Hence, we proposed that the L2 region acted as the receptor for the gating particle. The latter has awaited confirmation in a system in which functional channels can be assessed.
Small peptides are commonly used to competitively interfere with proteinprotein interactions.9 Here, we reason that if the L2 region acts as a receptor for the gating particle, channel properties (such as residence in the residual state) could be impaired by a peptide of the L2 region that, by binding to the gating element, could competitively inhibit its association to the endogenous loop domain. Here, we tested the effect of a peptide corresponding to the L2 region on the electrophysiological properties of Cx43 channels. The results show that this peptide reduced the frequency of channel transitions into the residual state, prolonged open time and transition rate, and modified the voltage dependence of the junctional current. These modifications were analogous to those previously observed when the CT domain was deleted from the Cx43 sequence.5 Our data indicate that the L2 region interacts (directly or indirectly) with a separate region of Cx43 (likely the CT domain) during channel gating. Our data further support the notion that the L2 region is in close structural association with the pore and may be part of the channel vestibule.10,11 Moreover, we show that small peptides can be used to interfere with gap junction function, a strategy that may be useful for rational design of gap junction pharmacophores.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Solutions
The composition of the internal and external solutions was the same as described by Moreno et al.5 When necessary, coupling was decreased by superfusion with octanol (0.5 to 2 mmol/L). The L2 peptide (amino acid sequence 119 to 144; see Duffy et al)8 or an L2 peptide holding the mutation H126K-I130N was added to the pipette solution to a final concentration of 0.1 mmol/L. Chemical compounds for cell culture and for the preparation of the stock solutions were purchased from (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo).
Electrophysiology
Transiently transfected N2A cells were illuminated with monochromatic light (495 nm) and emitted fluorescence passed through a bandpass (520 to 560 nm) filter to monitor eGFP expression. Those cell pairs identified positive for eGFP were targeted for electrophysiological analysis. Recordings were obtained using conventional dual-patch clamp techniques.4 Single channel recordings were obtained at a transjunctional voltage (Vj) of +60 mV. Input resistance was continuously monitored to ensure proper voltage control at the junction. Cell pairs showing chord membrane conductances >400 pS (picosiemens) (measured between 40 mV and +20 mV) were discarded. All signals were acquired in broad band, digitized, and stored for offline analysis. Analysis of data were performed using the pClamp suite of programs (Versions 8.2; Axon Instruments, Union City, Calif). Currents were filtered offline (0.1 to 1 kHz) and digitally sampled at 2 to 10 kHz.
Most determinations of unitary conductance were obtained in the presence of 0.5 to 2 mmol/L octanol. In some cases, however, recordings were obtained from cells for which only 1 or 2 functional channels were spontaneously detected. Histograms of events (see also below) were obtained from channels recorded during repetitive 10- to 20-second steps to Vj=+60 mV. Channel events were manually selected and measured. Only events lasting 20 ms or more (to reduce filtering artifacts) were included in the event histogram. Unitary currents were divided by the driving force (+60 mV) to obtain unitary conductance. All-points histograms of digitized current traces, as well as frequency (percentage of total events) distribution histograms, were constructed using Origin (version 7.0; Microcal, Northampton, Mass). Rate of transition between states was measured in 100 transitions acquired between 30 and 60 minutes after patch break. The measured transitions were chosen for their high signal-to-noise ratio. For these measurements, transitions were filtered at 1 kHz. The frequency of transitions into the residual state was determined from the first 100 transitions recorded 30 minutes after patch break. This standard was arbitrarily chosen to avoid possible variations in the residence of a given state that may have occurred as a result of time after patch break.
Peptide Synthesis
Peptidic fragments of the cytoplasmic loop region of Cx43 (L2 peptide and peptide H126K-I130N; see text below) were synthesized (>95% purity) at the Laboratory for Macromolecular Analysis at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine using Fmoc (9-fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl) chemistry on an Applied Biosystems 430A automated peptide synthesizer.8
Mirror Resonance Spectroscopy
Mirror resonance spectroscopy (MRS) experiments were performed using an IAsys apparatus as described previously.8 Recombinant Cx43CT was used as ligand. Concentration dependence curves were best-fit by a single exponential function, as predicted by first-order rate kinetics.8
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
The L2 Region and the Residual State
The results noted above are consistent with the hypothesis that the residual state is consequent to the interaction of the L2 region with a separate domain of Cx43, which acts as a gating particle. Accordingly, the free peptide would bind the gating element and prevent its interaction with the native L2 domain. This model would imply that a mutation in the L2 region that interferes with its binding to the gating element should also interfere with the residual state. Although preservation of a conductive channel pore is highly dependent on the integrity of the L2 region,13 we found a specific double mutation (H126K-I130N) that was compatible with channel function, albeit the probability of finding functional channels was greatly decreased. Of the 24 cell pairs examined, 11 showed electrical coupling. Two pairs showed macroscopic conductance, but the cells lost input resistance during octanol superfusion. Six pairs showed very sporadic events (<10 events in the duration of recording). Three other pairs showed spontaneous single channel activity. A total of 161 events were collected from these 3 pairs. The histogram of events showed a dominant peak at 109 pS. Moreover, almost all transitions occurred between the closed state and a single open state (frequency of transitions into the residual state was 8.3±4.4%, N=3). An example of single channel activity from this mutant is presented in Figure 3A. All the transitions between open and residual state were completed within 3 ms (not shown), whereas transitions between closed and open state ranged from 3.5 to 18.3 ms.
|
In Vitro Binding of the CT Domain to Synthetic Peptides of the L2 Region: Mirror Resonance Spectroscopy
The electrophysiological data presented above would suggest that mutation H126K-I130N prevents the L2 interaction with the gating particle. Previous data suggest that the CT domain of Cx43 may act as the gating particle47 (see also "Discussion"). Hence, we used MRS to test the ability of peptide H126K-I130N to bind in vitro to the CT domain and compared the results with those obtained when the CT domain was bound to the wild-type L2 peptide.8 Figure 3B and 3C show the results. Figure 3B depicts MRS traces obtained from addition of either the L2 peptide (black trace) or peptide H126K-I130N (gray trace) to a cuvette loaded with the recombinant CT domain. Clearly, although the L2 peptide bound effectively to the CT domain, no binding of peptide H126K-I130N to the CT was detected at pH 6.5, regardless of the concentration tested (Figure 3C).
Effect of Peptide H126K/I130N on the Biophysical Properties of Cx43 Channels
The data in Figure 3 would suggest that mutation H126K-I130N prevents the interaction between the L2 region and the CT domain. The latter led us to propose that an L2 peptide harboring the H126K-I130N mutation would fail to interfere with the residual state.
Figure 4 shows results from these experiments. Clearly, as shown by the traces in Figure 4A, in addition to the open and closed states a conductive "residual" state was recorded. The frequency of transitions into the residual state measured from these experiments was 66.3±7.8% (N=6). This behavior was similar to that observed in the wild-type channel.1,2 Consistent with this observation, the histogram of events showed 2 peaks, corresponding to the transitions between residual and open (80.3±0.4 pS) and between closed and open (101.7±0.5 pS).
|
Effects of L2 Peptide on Rate of Transition and Mean Open Time
A possible explanation for the results in Figures 1 and 2
is that the L2 peptide binds to the gating particle, thus preventing its interaction with the native receptor. If the L2 peptide interfered with gating by binding to the CT domain, then changes in function induced by the L2 peptide would be similar to those observed after truncation of the CT domain. Previous studies have shown that, as in the case of L2 peptide exposure, CT truncation eliminated the residual state. The same truncation also caused slowing of the rate of transition (closed to open), an increase in channel open time and a change in voltage dependence.5 Here, we aimed to determine whether similar effects were detected when the L2 peptide was dialyzed in the intracellular space.
Rate of ClosedOpen Transition
A particlereceptor interaction has been proposed to be responsible for fast Vj gating. Hence, as in the case of CT truncation, interference with this interaction would be expected to prolong the rate of transition between states.5 An example is shown in Figure 5A. Two traces are shown. The one labeled "L2" was obtained from a cell pair where the L2 peptide was present in the pipette solution. The trace labeled "H126K-I130N" was obtained in the presence of the peptide harboring the mutation. Notice that in the case of the cell pair exposed to the L2 peptide, the channel transited between the closed and the open states, whereas in the presence of the mutant peptide, the transition originated from the residual state (see Figures 1 and 4![]()
![]()
). For these experiments, data were filtered at a cutoff frequency of 1 kHz to avoid filtering artifacts. As shown by the histograms in Figure 5C, almost all of the transitions (91.8%) recorded in the presence of peptide H126K-I130N were equal to or shorter than 3 ms. The latter is similar to the behavior observed in the wild-type channel in the absence of any peptides.2,5 In contrast, 63.9% of all measured transitions recorded in the presence of the L2 peptide required >3 ms to complete (Figure 5B). The latter suggests that the L2 peptide is able to interfere with the mechanism controlling fast Vj gating.
|
Mean Open Time and Closed Time
Previous studies have shown that the time the Cx43 channel resides in the open state is prolonged after truncation of the CT domain.5 Here, we characterized this parameter from Cx43 channels when in the presence of the L2 peptide. Only data obtained in the absence of any uncouplers and when a single channel was active in the recording were included in the analysis. Given the limited likelihood of obtaining the proper conditions for these recordings, and the clear indication that the H126K-I30N peptide was not affecting the properties of the wild-type Cx43 channel (see Figure 4), we decided to compare our results with those obtained previously from wild-type Cx43 and from the mutant of Cx43 lacking the CT domain.1,2,5,7 Figure 6A shows a histogram indicating the frequency of events that presented a given open time. A bell-shaped distribution was observed, with a mean value of 937.8 ms (N=2, n=205). This value of mean open time falls between that reported previously for wild-type channels (440 to 560 ms; Brink et al14) and that observed after truncation of the CT domain (2450 ms).5 Finally, closed times for Cx43 channels in the presence of L2 were best described by 3 Gaussian functions with the major peak centered at 14.8 and minor peaks at 556.8 and 10512.4 ms (see Figure 6B), consistent with the notion that Cx43 channels in the presence of the L2 peptide tend to favor the open state.
|
Voltage Dependence of Cx43 Channels in the Presence of the L2 Peptide
Intracellular delivery of the L2 peptide led to a modification of the voltage dependence of Cx43 channels. Results are presented in Figure 7. The plot depicts the junctional conductance as a function of transjunctional voltage. The characteristic bell-shaped function was recorded. The data were best fit by a Boltzman function with the following parameters: V0=60.9±0.1 mV, A=0.08±0.001 mV1, Gjmin=0.13±0.003 for negative Vj values; V0=65.9±0.3 mV, A=0.07±0.001 mV1, Gjmin=0.09±0.007 for positive Vj values (N=6). The recorded value of Gjmin was lower than that reported previously for Cx43 wild-type channels (Gjmin=0.35 for negative Vj values; Gjmin=0.39 for positive Vj values) and similar to that observed after truncation of the CT domain (Gjmin=0.08 for negative Vj values; Gjmin=0.09 for positive Vj values).5 These data are consistent with the notion that the L2 peptide interferes with gating to the residual state of the channel.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Technical Considerations
Although the results obtained from patch clamp studies are consistent with the in vitro MRS data (Figure 3B and 3C), we recognize that the behavior of a recombinant protein in solution may differ from that of the native protein in the cellular environment. This concern applies to all in vitro studies, particularly those in which protein structures are solved, given the extreme conditions necessary for protein isolation, ordering, and/or crystallization (eg, Unger et al 10). Particularly worth noting is the fact that MRS experiments were conducted at pH 6.5; indeed, lowering the pH of the solvent significantly increases the structural order of L2 and its binding affinity for CT. Yet, the electrophysiological experiments were conducted at normal pH. Whether the cellular environment facilitates the organization of the structure even at the normal pH of the cell is likely, but remains to be determined.
We delivered synthetic peptides via the patch pipette to determine their effect on channel properties. Yet, it is always possible that the peptide fails to reach the area of cellcell apposition and/or that it gets degraded by intracellular proteases. To increase the chance that the peptide had reached the gap junction plaque, we measured only channel activity acquired 30 minutes after patch break. The decrease in the frequency of transitions into the residual state suggests that the L2 peptide was indeed active in the cell. Although we cannot be certain of the same with regard to peptide H126K-I130N, it seems unlikely that the mutation affected the ability of the peptide to diffuse into the cell or increased its degradation rate by proteases. Rather, we propose that peptide H126K-I130N did not interfere with the residual state because it failed to interact with the gating particle.
The L2 Peptide as a Competitive Inhibitor of Gating
It is our hypothesis that the L2 region acts as a receptor for the gating particle. Accordingly, it should be possible to use site-directed mutagenesis to prevent gating either by deletion of the gating particle (likely the CT domain; see Revilla et al7 or Moreno et al5) or by deletion of the L2 region. However, deletions within the L2 region render the Cx43 protein unable to form conductive channels.13 We found a particular double mutation (H126K/I130N) that allowed us to observe functional gap junction channels, though at a very low probability. Our recordings revealed a drastic reduction of the frequency of transition into the residual state for this particular mutant. Based on that information, we tested a pair of synthetic peptides of the L2 region. We reasoned that if the L2 region were the receptor, the corresponding peptide would bind to the gating particle and prevent it from binding to the native receptor. A peptide bearing the H126K-I130N would not bind to the particle, and, therefore, channel function would be unaffected. The end result (prevention of the particle-receptor interaction by the L2 peptide) would then be analogous to that obtained after deletion of the gating particle. The results in this article are consistent with this hypothesis.
Effect of the L2 Peptide in Comparison With Truncation of the CT Domain
Although our results present similarities with those obtained after truncation of the CT domain,5 important differences need to be considered. In particular, the estimated value of mean open time in the presence of the L2 peptide (937 ms; see Figure 6A) is less than what Moreno et al reported for the truncated channel (2450 ms).5 It is worth noting that both of these values are, in turn, significantly higher than what had been reported for wild-type Cx43.14 Yet, the prolongation of open time is more pronounced after CT truncation. Similarly, our data show a 5- to 10-mV increase in V0 in the presence of the L2 peptide. The latter seems consistent with the fact that the mean open time was prolonged. For the truncated channel, V0 was increased by
15mV, also consistent with the more prolonged open time.5 The reason for these discrepancies remains unclear, but may relate to the extent to which each manipulation alters wild-type behavior. Truncation of the CT would completely eliminate the particle-receptor interaction (no particle is available). On the other hand, addition of the L2 peptide would competitively inhibit binding of the CT to its endogenous receptor. Thus, although truncation represents an extreme, "steady-state" intervention, L2 peptide exposure establishes a dynamic situation in which gating kinetics would depend on the balance of affinities and concentrations of all 3 players (CT, free L2 peptide, and the L2 region of the protein). We speculate that in the presence of L2 peptide, the CT would switch with a given probability between binding the endogenous cytoplasmic loop (thus behaving like the native channel) and binding the free peptide, hence behaving similar to the truncated channel. This competition would translate quantitatively in a modification of the wild-type behavior less drastic than that caused by the entire removal of the particle domain. As such, the mean open time would be less in the presence of the peptide than the one observed after truncation. The prolongation of mean open time in the presence of the peptide may not be enough to displace V0 in a magnitude distinct from data scattering.
Effect of the L2 Peptide on the Rate of Transitions
Our results show that in the presence of the L2 peptide, most channel transitions occurred between the open and the closed states. Approximately 30% of all transitions measured involved residence in the residual state. All transitions between the open and the residual state were completed in <3 ms, whereas 88% of the open-to-closed transitions were completed in >3 ms. The results show a very clear distinction between the 2 populations and are consistent with the notion that open-to-residual transitions are "fast" and open-to-closed transitions are "slow"; yet, we did observe a small fraction (12%) of transitions between open and closed states that were completed in <3 ms. Examples of fast transitions between open and closed states can be found in the literature (see Banach and Weingart).15 Whether this frequency of fast open-to-closed events is higher than what would be observed in the absence of the peptide remains to be determined.
Possible Location of the L2 Region in the 3D Structure of the Channel
One of the assumptions regarding the receptor for the gating particle is that this domain should be affiliated with the pore. We have proposed that the L2 region may be part of the channel vestibule. The latter seems consistent with the solved structure of the Cx43 channel.10 Indeed, the data show electron densities in the intracellular region that are continuations of 1 of the pore-forming transmembrane domains,10 likely TM311 (however see Nunn et al).16 These densities are consistent with
-helical configurations (as proposed)8 and their position with respect to the rest of the channel would place them as a part of the pore vestibule. Further studies will be necessary to definitely assign a correlation between primary sequence of Cx43 and the high-order structure of the channel.
Position of the Gating Particle in the Cx43 Sequence
Studies conducted in Cx32 channels, led to the conclusion that the gating element corresponds to the amino terminal (NT) domain of the protein.17 By inference from those studies, it was proposed that the NT domain is also the gating particle of Cx43.3 Yet, as noted by Harris,18 this extrapolation is questionable, given that there are important differences in the primary sequences of the NT domains, thus making the structural model developed for Cx32 not directly applicable to Cx43. In the absence of experimental confirmation, other structural models should be considered.
We have proposed that amino acids within the CT domain may act as a gating particle. This hypothesis is supported by the following observations: (1) fast Vj gating is eliminated after truncation of the CT domain4,5; (2) truncation of the CT domain also eliminates the residual state4,5; (3) the residual state is restored if the CT domain is coexpressed as a separate particle.4,5 Here we further show that a peptide that binds to the CT domain (see Duffy et al8; see also Figure 3B and 3C) mimics the functional consequences of CT deletion. Although our data do not discard the possible participation of other regions of the protein in the gating process, it points to the CT domain as one of the components that interact with the channel vestibule to bring about the residual state.
The CT-L2 Binding: A ParticleReceptor Interaction
We propose that the L2 region is a part of the channel vestibule and that the CT domain is part of the gating particle. Evidence that these 2 domains are able to bind to each other comes from our spectroscopic studies.8 Here, we have shown that a peptide of the L2 region modifies channel function in a manner consistent with what would be predicted if the L2 region acts as a receptor for the gating particle. These data show that small peptides can be used to interfere with gap junction function, as predicted by structural analysis. Our results may lead to the development of a gap junction pharmacology based on rational drug design.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Bukauskas FF, Peracchia C. Two distinct gating mechanisms in gap junction channels: CO2-sensitive and voltage-sensitive. Biophys J. 1997; 72: 21372142.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Bukauskas FF, Bukauskiene A, Verselis VK. Conductance and permeability of the residual state of connexin43 gap junction channels. J Gen Physiol. 2002; 119: 171185.
4. Anumonwo JM, Taffet SM, Gu H, Chanson M, Moreno AP, Delmar M. The carboxyl terminal domain regulates the unitary conductance and voltage dependence of connexin40 gap junction channels. Circ Res. 2001; 88: 666673.
5. Moreno AP, Chanson M, Anumonwo J, Scerri I, Gu H, Taffet SM, Delmar M. Role of the carboxyl terminal of connexin43 in transjunctional fast voltage gating. Circ Res. 2002; 90: 450457.
6. Morley GE, Taffet SM, Delmar M. Intramolecular interactions mediate pH regulation of connexin43 channels. Biophys J. 1999; 70: 12941302.[CrossRef]
7. Revilla A, Castro C, Barrio LC. Molecular dissection of transjunctional voltage dependence in the connexin-32 and connexin-43 junctions. Biophys J. 1999; 77: 13741383.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Duffy HS, Sorgen PL, Girvin ME, ODonnell P, Coombs W, Taffet SM, Delmar M, Spray DC. pH-dependent intramolecular binding and structure involving Cx43 cytoplasmic domains. J Biol Chem. 2002; 277: 3670636714.
9. Kanemitsu MY, Loo LW, Simon S, Lau AF, Eckhart W. Tyrosine phosphorylation of connexin 43 by v-Src is mediated by SH2 and SH3 domain interactions. J Biol Chem. 1997; 272: 2282422831.
10. Unger VM, Kumar NM, Gilula NB, Yeager M. Three-dimensional structure of a recombinant gap junction membrane channel. Science. 1999; 283: 11761180.
11. Skerrett IM, Aronowitz J, Shin JH, Cymes G, Kasperek E, Cao FL, Nicholson BJ. Identification of amino acid residues lining the pore of a gap junction channel. J Cell Biol. 2002; 159: 349360.
12. Zhong G, Mantel PL, Jiang X, Jarry-Guichard T, Gros D, Labarrere C, Moreno AP. LacSwitch II regulation of connexin43 cDNA expression enables gap-junction single channel analysis. Biotechniques. 2003; 34: 10341046.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Seki A, Coombs W, Taffet SM, Delmar M. Loss of electrical communication, but not plaque formation, after mutations in the cytoplasmic loop of Cx43. Heart Rhythm. 2004; 1: 227233.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Brink PR, Ramanan SV, Christ GJ. Human connexin43 gap junction channel gating: evidence for mode shifts and/or heterogeneity. Am J Physiol. 1996; 271: C321C331.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Banach K, Weingart R. Voltage gating of Cx43 gap junction channels involves fast and slow current transitions. Pflugers Arch. 2000; 439: 248250.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Nunn RS, Macke TJ, Olson AJ, Yeager M. Transmembrane alpha-helices in the gap junction membrane channel: systematic search of packing models based on the pair potential function. Microsc Res Tech. 2001; 52: 344351.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Ri Y, Ballesteros JA, Abrams CK, Oh S, Verselis VK, Weinstein H, Bargiello TA. The role of a conserved proline residue in mediating conformational changes associated with voltage gating of Cx32 gap junctions. Biophys J. 1999; 76: 28872898.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Harris AL. Voltage-sensing and substate rectification: moving parts of connexin channels. J Gen Physiol. 2002; 119: 165169.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Bouvier, G. Spagnol, S. Chenavas, F. Kieken, H. Vitrac, S. Brownell, A. Kellezi, V. Forge, and P. L. Sorgen Characterization of the Structure and Intermolecular Interactions between the Connexin40 and Connexin43 Carboxyl-terminal and Cytoplasmic Loop Domains J. Biol. Chem., December 4, 2009; 284(49): 34257 - 34271. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Retamal, S. Yin, G. A. Altenberg, and L. Reuss Modulation of Cx46 hemichannels by nitric oxide Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, June 1, 2009; 296(6): C1356 - C1363. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Lewandowski, K. Procida, R. Vaidyanathan, W. Coombs, J. Jalife, M. S. Nielsen, S. M. Taffet, and M. Delmar RXP-E: A Connexin43-Binding Peptide That Prevents Action Potential Propagation Block Circ. Res., August 29, 2008; 103(5): 519 - 526. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Ruiz-Meana, A. Rodriguez-Sinovas, A. Cabestrero, K. Boengler, G. Heusch, and D. Garcia-Dorado Mitochondrial connexin43 as a new player in the pathophysiology of myocardial ischaemia-reperfusion injury Cardiovasc Res, January 15, 2008; 77(2): 325 - 333. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Shibayama, R. Lewandowski, F. Kieken, W. Coombs, S. Shah, P. L. Sorgen, S. M. Taffet, and M. Delmar Identification of a Novel Peptide That Interferes With the Chemical Regulation of Connexin43 Circ. Res., June 9, 2006; 98(11): 1365 - 1372. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Singh, J. L. Solan, S. M. Taffet, R. Javier, and P. D. Lampe Connexin 43 Interacts with Zona Occludens-1 and -2 Proteins in a Cell Cycle Stage-specific Manner J. Biol. Chem., August 26, 2005; 280(34): 30416 - 30421. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Mather, K. A. Dora, S. L. Sandow, P. Winter, and C. J. Garland Rapid Endothelial Cell-Selective Loading of Connexin 40 Antibody Blocks Endothelium-Derived Hyperpolarizing Factor Dilation in Rat Small Mesenteric Arteries Circ. Res., August 19, 2005; 97(4): 399 - 407. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Research Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2004 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |