Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation Research
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation Research. 2003;93:694-696
doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000097926.29243.96
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cingolani, H.E.
Right arrow Articles by Mosca, S.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cingolani, H.E.
Right arrow Articles by Mosca, S.M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Animal models of human disease
Right arrow Genetically altered mice
Right arrow Ischemic biology - basic studies
Right arrow Genetics of cardiovascular disease
(Circulation Research. 2003;93:694.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.


Editorials

NHE-1 and NHE-6 Activities

Ischemic and Reperfusion Injury

H.E. Cingolani, I.L. Ennis, S.M. Mosca

From the Centro de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares, La Plata, Argentina.

Correspondence to Horacio E. Cingolani, MD, Centro De Investigaciones Cardiovasculares, Facultad de Ciencias Medicas, Universidad Nacional de Le Plata-60 y 120, La Plata 1900, Argentina. E-mail cicmes{at}infovia.com.ar


Key Words: myocardial infarction • NHE-1 • NHE-6 • apoptosis • necrosis

The study1 published in this issue of Circulation Research showing that a null mutation of NHE-1 improves the tolerance of the heart to ischemia and reperfusion (I/R) is an important contribution for the following reasons: (1) In the animals with null mutation, contracture during the ischemic period was less and ATP levels were preserved compared with wild-type animals. This observation, on the one hand, provides evidence that protection by downregulation of NHE-1 during the ischemic period itself is indeed possible and, on the other hand, it argues against the suggestion that the exchanger is inactive during this same period.2 (2) In contrast with chronic blockade of the NHE-1 by pharmacological interventions,3 the long-term absence of the exchanger does not elicit major compensatory changes that, in turn, might negate the cardioprotective effect of blocking its activity for a relative short term. This point is related to a recent publication3 showing that long-term treatment with the NHE-1 blocker cariporide is followed by an upregulation of the functional units of the exchanger in a similar way to the well-known tolerance phenomenon following ß-adrenergic receptor blockade. The absence of such upregulation negates possible hypersensitivity to ischemia upon withdrawal of the medication. The risk is evident in hearts with upregulation of NHE-1, which gain Na+i more rapidly during ischemia, and show impaired recovery after reperfusion.4 (3) No additional protection was obtained by adding the NHE-1 blocker eniporide to the NHE-1 null mice, suggesting that there is not another NHE isoform that can be blocked with this compound to add additional protection; the findings additionally hint that the attenuation of the injury obtained by the absence of the sarcolemmal NHE-1 is maximal and, therefore, no further beneficial effect will be detected by blocking the mitochondrial NHE (MNHE).

The classical explanation of the mechanism by which the NHE-1 blockade protects against I/R is as follows. During ischemia, a cytosolic acidosis of approximately 1 pH unit occurs in about 10 minutes. This cytosolic acidosis stimulates the NHE-1, increasing its activity and augmenting cytosolic Na+ and Ca2+ levels.5,6 Although other mechanisms could contribute to the increase in intracellular Na+ (Na+i)7 during ischemia, it has been shown that blockade of the NHE-1 before ischemia abolishes the increase in Na+i during this period5,8 and diminishes the increase in cytosolic Na+ and Ca2+ during reperfusion.5,6 The increase in Ca2+ secondary to the increase in Na+ seems to be caused by the Na+-Ca2+ exchanger (NCX) working in reverse mode,9 and cytosolic Ca2+ overload is a necrotic and apoptotic signal. Although with some contradictory results, it has been possible to obtain protection from I/R by blocking the NHE-1 or the NCX only after the onset of reperfusion,10–12 suggesting that there is protection against the reperfusion injury induced by these mechanisms in addition to protection from the ischemic injury.

Although other mechanisms can be operative,13 the activation of NHE-1 at the onset of reperfusion has been linked to the increase in reactive oxygen species (ROS).14–16 This exchanger reaches its maximal activity early after reperfusion. It has been proposed that the increase in ROS leads to activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway, phosphorylating ERK1/2 and the cytosolic tail of the NHE-1, increasing the exchanger activity.17 On the other hand, it has been also reported that ERK1/2 mediates activation of the Na+-HCO3- cotransport and that blockade of this mechanism protects against I/R injury.18

The available evidence, therefore, establishes that the cytosolic Ca2+ overload induced by the NCX working in its reverse mode can be prevented by blocking the NHE-1, decreasing Na+i. A recent publication19 makes things more difficult to interpret. In this study, the authors showed that cariporide preserves mitochondrial proton gradient and delays ATP depletion in mouse-derived myocytes (HL-1) after simulated ischemia and suggested that these mitochondrial changes are not secondary to changes in the cytosol. They concluded that, during ischemia, cariporide acts at the mitochondrial level, delaying mitochondrial matrix acidification and preserving ATP levels. They also suggested that the prevention of mitochondrial Ca2+ overload was not cariporide’s mechanism of protection.

Mitochondrial NHE (MNHE) is apparently encoded by NHE-6, with a molecular structure similar to that of NHE-1.20–22 However, there are still some concerns about the identification of the NHE-6 with the MNHE.21,22 The MNHE can be blocked by several NHE blockers including cariporide19,23,24; therefore, this drug blocks both the NHE-1 (sarcolemmal) and the NHE-6 (mitochondrial) gene products.

In a more recent study,25 the effect of cariporide on cell death induced by oxidative stress was examined in cultured neonatal cardiomyocytes. The inhibitor suppressed cytosolic Na+ and Ca2+ accumulation and the loss of mitochondrial membrane potential induced by H2O2, while also decreasing the mitochondrial Ca2+ overload induced by H2O2. Despite the decrease in cytosolic and mitochondrial Ca2+ overload, their results suggested a contribution of two Ca2+-independent pathways: calcium-independent cell death and calcium-independent cytochrome c release induced by the blocker. These results suggest that NHE-1 blockade preserves mitochondrial integrity after oxidant stress. These actions were not blunted by mitochondrial KATP channel blockers, revealing different mechanisms of protection from those operative in ischemic preconditioning. Although some studies have suggested that NHE-1 inhibition and ischemic preconditioning are linked phenomena, this25 and other studies26–29 provide evidence that this is not the case. Moreover, experiments in isolated rat hearts comparing ischemic preconditioning with NHE inhibition showed that, although after reperfusion protection was similar, only the NHE inhibition was able to decrease the ischemic contracture.26

How can we reconcile the evidence that null mutation of the NHE-1 induces protection from ischemia/reperfusion and that cariporide also protects against ischemia/reperfusion but acting on another isoform? The simplest explanation is that, although the downregulation of the NHE-1 by its ablation by genetic techniques protects the heart from ischemia/reperfusion, additional protection can be obtained by the blockade of MNHE (NHE-6) with the compound. However, the investigators did not accomplish additional protection from I/R when a blocker of the NHE-1, eniporide, was added to the animals with the null mutation of the NHE-1. Among the possibilities to understand this discrepancy, we should consider the following: first, that NHE-1 is not only the sarcolemmal isoform of the NHE but also the mitochondrial one; second, that the genetic manipulation of these animals produced an unintentional downregulation or modification of the MNHE, making it "inactive" for the ischemic/reperfusion injury; third, that the attenuation of the injury obtained with the blockade of the NHE-1 is maximal and so no further beneficial effect will be detected blocking the MNHE.

New avenues of research begin with the novel contributions of these studies about the reperfusion injury process. Should we consider the existence of two protections, one during ischemia and the other one during reperfusion, each mediated by a different NHE isoform? Is the acidification of the cytosol a change that attenuates the reperfusion injury, in contrast to the same change in the mitochondrial matrix? What is the role of NCX in cytosol and mitochondrial Ca2+ overload? May Ca2+ overload in one compartment protect the other? Should we consider the downregulation of the heart NHE by genetic techniques a gene therapy possibility? All are questions that should be answered in the near future.

In contrast with the promising results coming from studies in several animal species and NHE inhibitors, clinical trials have not shown unequivocal evidence of this protection. The GUARDIAN,30 ESCAMI,31 and EXPEDITION32 trials are examples of such disappointment. The latter was started in 2001 and stopped 6 months later for reasons unreleased to the public. The strikingly beneficial effects of NHE inhibition in well-controlled experimental systems give reason to hope that future drug trials may prove the clinical utility of this therapeutic principle.

Footnotes

The opinions expressed in this editorial are not necessarily those of the editors or of the American Heart Association.

References

1. Wang Y, Meyer JW, Ashraf M, Shull GE. Mice with a null mutation in the NHE1 Na+-H+ exchanger are resistant to cardiac ischemia-reperfusion injury. Circ Res. 2003; 93: 776–782.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Allen DG, Xiao XH. Role of the cardiac Na+/H+ exchanger during ischemia and reperfusion. Cardiovasc Res. 2003; 57: 934–941.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Camilion de Hurtado MC, Ennis IL, Perez NG, Chiappe de Cingolani GE, Morgan P, Cingolani HE. Upregulation of myocardial Na+/H+ exchanger induced by chronic treatment with a selective inhibitor. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2002; 34: 1539–1547.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

4. Bak MI, Ingwall JS. Contribution of Na+/H+ exchange to Na+ overload in the ischemic hypertrophied hyperthyroid rat heart. Cardiovasc Res. 2003; 57: 1004–1014.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. An J, Varadarajan SG, Camara A, Chen Q, Novalija E, Gross GJ, Stowe DF. Blocking Na+/H+ exchange reduces [Na+]i and [Ca++]i load after ischemia and improves function in intact hearts. Am J Physiol. 2001; 281: H2398–2409.

6. Strömer H, de Groot MCH, Horn M, Faul C, Leupold A, Morgan JP, Scholz W, Neubauer S. Na+/H+ exchange inhibition with HOE 642 improves postischemic recovery due to attenuation of Ca2+ overload and prolonged acidosis on reperfusion. Circulation. 2000; 101: 2749–2755.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Baetz D, Bernard M, Pinet C, Tamareille S, Chattou S, El Banani H, Coulombe A, Feuvray D. Different pathways for sodium entry in cardiac cells during ischemia and early reperfusion. Mol Cell Biochem. 2003; 242: 115–120.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

8. ten Hove M, van Emous JG, van Echteld CJ. Na+ overload during ischemia and reperfusion in rat hearts: comparison of the Na+/H+ exchange blockers EIPA, cariporide and eniporide. Mol Cell Biochem. 2003; 205: 47–54.

9. Schafer C, Ladilov Y, Inserte J, Schafer M, Haffner S, Garcia-Dorado D, Piper HM. Role of the reverse mode of the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger in reoxygenation-induced cardiomyocyte injury. Cardiovasc Res. 2001; 51: 241–250.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

10. Rohmann S, Weygandt H, Minck K-O. Preischaemic as well as postischaemic application of a Na+/H+ exchange inhibitor reduces infarct size in pigs. Cardiovasc Res. 1995; 30: 945–951.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

11. Hurtado C, Pierce GN. Inhibition of Na+/H+ exchange at the beginning of reperfusion is cardioprotective in isolated, beating adult cardiomyocytes. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2000; 32: 1897–2007.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

12. Matsumoto T, Miura T, Miki T, Genda S, Shimamoto K. Blockade of the Na+-Ca2+ exchanger is more efficient than blockade of the Na+-H+ exchanger for protection of the myocardium from lethal reperfusion injury. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2002; 16: 295–301.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

13. Le Prigent K, Lagadic-Gossmann D, Mongodin E, Feuvray D. HCO3- dependent alkalinizing transporter in adult rat ventricular myocytes: characterization and modulation. Am J Physiol. 1997; 273: H2596–H2603.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

14. Sabri A, Byron KL, Samarel AM, Bell J, Lucchesi PA. Hydrogen peroxide activates mitogen-activated protein kinases and Na+-H+ exchange in neonatal rat cardiac myocytes. Circ Res. 1998; 82: 1053–1062.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Myers ML, Farhangkhoee P, Karmazyn M. Hydrogen peroxide induced impairment of post-ischemic ventricular function is prevented by the sodium-hydrogen exchange inhibitor HOE 642 (cariporide). Cardiovasc Res. 1998; 40: 290–296.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Snabaitis AK, Hearse DJ, Avkiran M. Regulation of sarcolemmal Na+/H+ exchange by hydrogen peroxide in adult rat ventricular myocytes. Cardiovasc Res. 2002; 53: 470–480.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Rothstein EC, Byron KL, Reed RE, Fliegel L, Lucchesi PA. H2O2-induced Ca2+ overload in NRVM involves ERK1/2 MAP kinases: role for an NHE-1-dependent pathway. Am J Physiol. 2002; 283: H598–H605.

18. Baetz D, Haworth RS, Avkiran M, Feuvray D. The ERK pathway regulates Na+-HCO3- cotransport activity in adult rat cardiomyocytes. Am J Physiol. 2002; 283: H2102–H2109.

19. Ruiz-Meana M, Garcia-Dorado D, Pina P, Inserte J, Agulló L, Soler-Soler J. Cariporide preserves mitochondrial proton gradient and delays ATP depletion in cardiomyocytes during ischemic conditions. Am J Physiol. 2003; 285: H999–H1006.

20. Numata M, Petrecca K, Lake N, Orlowski J. Identification of a mitochondrial Na+/H+ exchanger. J Biol Chem. 1998; 273: 6951–6959.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Miyazaki E, Sakaguchi M, Wakabayashi S, Shigekawa M, Mihara K. NHE6 protein possesses a signal peptide destined for endoplasmic reticulum membrane and localizes in secretory organelles of the cell. J Biol Chem. 2001; 276: 49221–49227.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Brett CL, Wei Y, Donowitz M, Rao R. Human Na+/H+ exchanger isoform 6 is found in recycling endosomes of cells, not in mitochondria. Am J Physiol. 2002; 282: C1031–C1041.

23. Hotta Y, Ishikawa N, Ohashi N, Matsui K. Effects of SM-20550, a selective Na+-H+ exchange inhibitor, on the ion transport of myocardial mitochondria. Mol Cell Biochem. 2001; 219: 83–90.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

24. Kapus A, Lukacs GL, Cragoe EJ Jr, Ligeti E, Fonyo A. Characterization of the mitochondrial Na+-H+ exchange: the effect of amiloride analogues. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1988; 944: 383–390.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

25. Teshima Y, Akao M, Jones SP, Marbán E. Cariporide (HOE 642), a selective Na+-H+ exchange inhibitor, inhibits the mitochondrial death pathway. Circulation. In press.

26. Mosca SM, Cingolani HE. Comparison of the protective effects of ischemic preconditioning and the Na+/H+ exchanger blockade. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2000; 362: 7–13.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

27. Gumina RJ, Beier N, Schelling P, Gross GJ. Inhibitors of ischemic preconditioning do not attenuate Na+/H+ exchange inhibitor mediated cardioprotection. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2000; 35: 949–953.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

28. Gumina RJ, Terzic A, Gross GJ. Do NHE inhibition and ischemic preconditioning convey cardioprotection through a common mechanism?. Basic Res Cardiol. 2001; 96: 318–324.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

29. Gumina RJ, Buerger E, Eickmeier C, Moore J, Daemmgen J, Gross GJ. Inhibition of the Na+/H+ exchanger confers greater cardioprotection against 90 minutes of myocardial ischemia than ischemic preconditioning in dogs. Circulation. 1999; 100: 2519–2526.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. Theroux P, Chaitman BR, Danchin N, Erhardt L, Meinertz T, Schroeder JS, Tognoni G, White HD, Willerson JT, Jessel A. Inhibition of the sodium-hydrogen exchanger with cariporide to prevent myocardial infarction in high-risk ischemic situations: main results of the GUARDIAN trial. Circulation. 2000; 102: 3032–3038.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. Zeymer U, Suryapranata H, Monassier JP, Opolski G, Davies J, Rasmanis G, Linssen G, Tebbe U, Schroder R, Tiemann R, Machnig T, Neuhaus KL, ESCAMI Investigators. The Na+/H+ exchange inhibitor eniporide as an adjunct to early reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction: results of the evaluation of the safety and cardioprotective effects of eniporide in acute myocardial infarction (ESCAMI) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001; 38: 1644–1650.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

32. Scholz W, Beier N. Development of the NHE inhibitors for cardiovascular therapeutics. In: Karmazyn M, Avkiran M, Fliegel L, eds. The Sodium-Hydrogen Exchanger. Boston, Mass: Kluwer; 2003: 255–262.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
C. D. Garciarena, C. I. Caldiz, M. V. Correa, G. R. Schinella, S. M. Mosca, G. E. Chiappe de Cingolani, H. E. Cingolani, and I. L. Ennis
Na+/H+ exchanger-1 inhibitors decrease myocardial superoxide production via direct mitochondrial action
J Appl Physiol, December 1, 2008; 105(6): 1706 - 1713.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cingolani, H.E.
Right arrow Articles by Mosca, S.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cingolani, H.E.
Right arrow Articles by Mosca, S.M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Animal models of human disease
Right arrow Genetically altered mice
Right arrow Ischemic biology - basic studies
Right arrow Genetics of cardiovascular disease