Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation Research
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation Research. 2003;93:481-483
doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000093183.00556.D5
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brozovich, F. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brozovich, F. V.
Related Collections
Right arrow Calcium cycling/excitation-contraction coupling
Right arrow Cell signalling/signal transduction
(Circulation Research. 2003;93:481.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.


Editorial

Rho Signaling

Agonist Stimulation and Depolarization Come Together

Frank V. Brozovich

From the Departments of Physiology and Biophysics, and Medicine (Cardiology), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.

Correspondence to Frank V. Brozovich, Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44106-4970. E-mail fxb9{at}cwru.edu


Key Words: force enhancement • smooth muscle • Rho-kinase • signaling

Force development in smooth muscle is dependent on Ca2+/calmodulin (Ca2+/CaM) activation of myosin light chain kinase (MLCK) and the subsequent phosphorylation of the regulatory myosin light chain (MLC20).1 However, when smooth muscle is stimulated with agonists2 or by direct activation of the G-proteins,3–6 a higher force is developed for a given [Ca2+] than for depolarization. Although the mechanism for this Ca2+ sensitization of the contractile filaments is still the subject of investigation, evidence suggests that the signaling pathway may involve either the activation of Rho (for reviews see7–9) and/or protein kinase C (PKC),10,11 although a pathway involving Rho and subsequent activation of Rho-kinase is more widely accepted. Agonist stimulation of smooth muscle can be divided into two phases: an initial rapid, transient increase in Ca2+ and MLC20 phosphorylation, and a subsequent phase of a sustained force despite lower levels of Ca2+ and MLC20 phosphorylation.12 There is evidence that the sustained phase of force maintenance is dependent on the activation of Rho.13

Although uncertainty exists regarding the mechanism by which receptor-mediated activation of the G-proteins leads to force enhancement, it is generally accepted that membrane depolarization leads to an increase in intracellular [Ca2+] and a Ca2+-dependent activation of MLCK to increase MLC20 phosphorylation and force. Thus, it has become dogma that depolarization leads to only an increase in Ca2+ and a subsequent activation of MLCK, without the activation of additional signaling pathways. Challenging these generally accepted principles is recent evidence that Rho-kinase inhibition almost completely eliminates the sustained portion of the phasic force response to 60 mmol/L KCl depolarization in rat tail artery without affecting the Ca2+ transient.14 The reduction in force was accompanied by a decrease in MLC20 phosphorylation. These results suggest that Rho-kinase is activated during depolarization of smooth muscle, and its activation leads to an inhibition of MLC phosphatase activity.

In this issue of Circulation Research, Sakurada et al15 extend and further delineate the mechanism by which inhibition of Rho-kinase depresses force during depolarization. During both agonist and KCl depolarization of rabbit aortic smooth muscle, these investigators demonstrated that the GTP-bound active form of Rho increases in a concentration-dependent manner and the inhibition of Rho-kinase with either Y27632 or HA1077 reduced force and MLC20 phosphorylation with similar concentration dependencies. These results suggest not only that Rho is activated during depolarization but that its activation increases force. Additionally, the group demonstrated that activation of Rho during KCl depolarization requires transmembrane Ca2+ flux and results in phosphorylation of the myosin binding subunit (MYPT1) of MLC phosphatase at Thr695. MYPT1 phosphorylation at this site has been previously demonstrated to inhibit MLC phosphatase activity,16 resulting in an increase in MLC20 phosphorylation and force.6,17 Taken together, the data suggest that depolarization leads to an activation of Rho, Rho-kinase, and subsequent MYPT1 phosphorylation resulting in an inhibition of MLC phosphatase activity and Ca2+ sensitization, similar to the pathway suggested for agonist-induced force enhancement.6,17

This Ca2+-dependent activation of Rho is a novel finding and establishes a dual role for Ca2+/CaM: activation of MLCK and inhibition of MLC phosphatase, both of which will lead to an increase in the level of MLC20 phosphorylation (Figure). This signaling pathway probably requires an intact cell membrane and thus would not be present in permeabilized and/or skinned preparations, explaining the absence of an effect of Rho-kinase inhibition on Ca2+ activation of skinned smooth muscle strips.18,19 However, Ca2+ activation of Rho is consistent with the observations that in permeabilized vascular smooth muscle, Ca2+ induces a translocation of Rho to the membrane20 and the inhibition of force produced by depolarization when Rho is inactivated.21



View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Proposed signaling pathways involved in the regulation of smooth muscle contraction. Depolarization (right side) increases intracellular Ca2+ to activate both MLCK, and also Rho, possibly via CAMKII, leading to an inhibition of MLC phosphatase activity. Agonist stimulation (left side) activates G-protein–dependent pathways, which lead to an increase in Ca2+ and activation of MLCK, and also Rho activation, leading to an inhibition of MLC phosphatase (see text for details). The abbreviations not defined in the text are as follows: PLC, phospholipase C; PIP2, 4,5-inositol bisphosphate; DAG, diacylglycerol; IP3, inositol trisphosphate; GEF, guanine nucleotide exchange factors; the activated form of Rho-kinase, Rho-kinase*; and the MLC phosphatase is a trimeric complex consisting of an MYPT1, catalytic subunit ({delta}) and a 20-kDa subunit of unknown function.

It has been demonstrated that the magnitude of the change in MLC20 phosphorylation produced by depolarization is less than that produced by agonist stimulation for any given level of intracellular Ca2+.2,4,6,22,23 This suggests that either depolarization only results in a Ca2+-dependent activation of MLCK or the inhibition of MLC phosphatase activity produced by depolarization is significantly less than produced by agonist activation. The results discussed above14,15 would argue for the latter. However if Rho-kinase inhibition produces similar decreases of force during activation by both agonists and depolarization,15 it is unclear how MLC20 phosphorylation can differ for the two forms of activation. One possibility is that there could be an additional factor required in the signaling pathway for the Ca2+-dependent activation of Rho. Sakurada et al15 have data that could implicate Ca2+/CaM-dependent protein kinase II (CAMKII). The CAMKII inhibitor KN93 depressed both force and Rho activation during membrane depolarization but had no effect on the activation of Rho or increase in force produced by ionomycin. These results could argue that for depolarization, transmembrane Ca2+ flux and either transmembrane signaling or signaling at the smooth muscle cell membrane is required for the subsequent activation of the Rho pathway.

Tissue-specific expression of a protein(s) required for this signaling cascade could explain the differences in the magnitude of Rho inhibition observed for different forms of smooth muscle activation. Changes in the level of MYPT1 phosphorylation have been shown to be tissue,13,17,24 agonist,25 and MYPT1 isoform19 specific. Additionally, the expression of both MYPT1 isoforms26 and the MLC phosphatase inhibitor CPI-1727 is tissue specific. These results could suggest that a Ca2+/CaM-dependent inhibition of MLC phosphatase is also tissue specific. It is possible that the Ca2+-induced translocation of Rho to the membrane20 occurs in all smooth muscle, but the subsequent activation of Rho requires the expression of another protein(s). Whether the activation of Rho requires Gq, as suggested by Sakurada et al,15 or some other factor is unclear, but the elucidation of the mechanism for Ca2+-dependent activation of Rho will require further studies.

The Rho/Rho-kinase signaling pathway is not only important for the regulation of smooth muscle contractility but also for other regulatory processes. Activation of the Rho/Rho-kinase pathway has been demonstrated to mediate actin organization and remodeling of the cytoskeleton in nonmuscle cells.28,29 During integrin-mediated signaling in Rat1 cells, evidence suggests that there is a Rho dependence of focal adhesion kinase and paxillin phosphorylation, and that the formation of large focal adhesions from which actin stress fibers radiate during cell spreading and membrane ruffling is dependent on the activation of Rho.29 In addition, in smooth muscle, data suggest that paxillin phosphorylation may participate in force maintenance.30 The results reported by Sakurada et al15 thus implicate Ca2+ both in the mechanism for integrin signaling and reorganization of the smooth muscle cytoskeleton.

The results of this study15 establish a dual role for Ca2+ in the regulation of smooth muscle contraction, activation of MLCK, and a Rho-mediated inhibition of MLC phosphatase. The inhibition of MLC phosphatase would produce a Ca2+ sensitization, a phenomenon that was previously thought to be restricted to only receptor-mediated forms of smooth muscle activation. The inhibition of MLC phosphatase activity has been implicated in the pathogenesis of hypertension31 and in the migration of malignant cells.32 Further, the activation of Rho is important in the regulation of cell morphology.28,29 Therefore, the regulation of Rho and its signaling pathway promises to be an active area of investigation.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from the NIH (HL44181 and HL64137).

Footnotes

The opinions expressed in this editorial are not necessarily those of the editors or of the American Heart Association.

References

1. Hartshorne DJ. Biochemistry of the contractile process in smooth muscle. In: LR Johnson, ed. Physiology of the Gastrointestinal Tract. New York, NY: Raven Press; 1987: 432–482.

2. DeFeo TT, Morgan KG. Calcium-force relationships as detected with aequorin in two different vascular smooth muscles of the ferret. J Physiol. 1985; 369: 269–282.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Nishimura J, Kolber M, van Breeman C. Norepinephrine and GTP-{gamma}-S increase myofilament Ca2+ sensitivity in {alpha}-toxin permeabilized arterial smooth muscle. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1988; 157: 677–683.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

4. Kitazawa T, Kobayashi S, Horiuti K, Somlyo AV, Somlyo AP. Receptor-coupled, permeabilized smooth muscle: role of the phosphatidylinositol cascade, G-proteins, and modulation of the contractile response to Ca2+. J Biol Chem. 1989; 264: 5339–5342.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Kitazawa T, Masuo M, Somlyo AP. G protein-mediated inhibition of myosin light-chain phosphatase in vascular smooth muscle. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991; 88: 9307–9310.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Kitazawa T, Gaylinn BD, Denney GH, Somlyo AP. G-protein-mediated Ca2+ sensitization of smooth muscle contraction through myosin light chain phosphorylation. J Biol Chem. 1992; 266: 1708–1715.

7. Somlyo AP, Somlyo AV. Signal transduction and regulation in smooth muscle. Nature. 1994; 372: 231–236.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

8. Hartshorne DJ, Ito M, Erdîdi F. Myosin light chain phosphatase: subunit composition, interactions and regulation. J Muscle Res Cell Motil. 1998; 19: 325–341.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

9. Somlyo AP, Somlyo AV. From pharmacomechanical coupling to G-proteins and myosin phosphatase. Acta Physiol Scand. 1998; 164: 437–448.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

10. Masuo M, Reardon S, Ikebe M, Kitazawa T. A novel mechanism for the Ca2+-sensitizing effect of protein kinase C on vascular smooth muscle: inhibition of myosin light chain phosphatase. J Gen Physiol. 1994; 104: 265–286.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Kitazawa T, Takizawa N, Ikebe M, Eto M. Reconstitution of protein kinase C-induced contractile Ca2+ sensitization in Triton X-100-demembranated rabbit arterial smooth muscle. J Physiol. 1999; 520: 139–152.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Jiang MJ, Morgan KG. Agonist-specific myosin phosphorylation and intracellular calcium during isometric contractions of arterial smooth muscle. Pflugers Arch. 1989; 413: 637–643.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

13. Swärd K, Dreja K, Susnjar M, Hellstrand P, Hartshorne DJ, Walsh MP. Inhibition of Rho-associated kinase blocks agonist-induced Ca2+ sensitization of myosin phosphorylation and force in guinea-pig ileum. J Physiol. 2000; 522: 33–49.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Mita M, Yanagihara H, Hishinuma S, Saito M, Walsh MP. Membrane depolarization-induced contraction of rat caudal arterial smooth muscle involves Rho-associated kinase. Biochem J. 2002; 364: 431–440.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

15. Sakurada S, Takuwa N, Sugimoto N, Wang Y, Seto M, Sasaki Y, Takuwa Y. Ca2+-dependent activation of Rho and Rho kinase in membrane depolarization-induced and receptor stimulation–induced vascular smooth muscle contraction. Circ Res. 2003; 93: 548–556.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Ichikawa K, Ito M, Hartshorne DJ. Phosphorylation of the large subunit of myosin phosphatase and inhibition of phosphatase activity. J Biol Chem. 1996; 271: 4733–4740.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Macdonald JA, Borman MA, Muranyi A, Somlyo AV, Hartshorne DJ, Haystead TA. Identification of the endogenous smooth muscle myosin phosphatase-associated kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001; 98: 2419–2424.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Anabuki J, Hori M, Hayakawa K, Akahane S, Ozaki H, Karaki H. Muscarinic stimulation does not induce rhoA/ROCK-mediated Ca2+ sensitization of the contractile element in chicken gizzard smooth muscle. Pflugers Arch. 2000; 441: 189–199.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

19. Richards CT, Ogut O, Brozovich FV. Agonist-induced force enhancement: the role of isoforms and phosphorylation of the myosin targeting subunit of myosin light chain phosphatase. J Biol Chem. 2002; 277: 4422–4427.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Gong MC, Fujihara H, Somlyo AV, Somlyo AP. Translocation of rhoA associated with Ca2+ sensitization of smooth muscle. J Biol Chem. 1997; 272: 10704–10709.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Fujihara H, Walker LA, Gong MC, Lemichez E, Boquet P, Somlyo AV, Somlyo AP. Inhibition of RhoA translocation and calcium sensitization by in vivo ADP-ribosylation with the chimeric toxin DC3B. Mol Biol Cell. 1997; 8: 2437–2447.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Rembold CM, Murphy RA. Myoplasmic [Ca2+] determines myosin phosphorylation in agonist-stimulated swine arterial smooth muscle. Circ Res. 1988; 63: 593–603.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Suematsu E, Resnick M, Morgan KG. Change of Ca2+ requirement for myosin phosphorylation by prostaglandin-F2{alpha}. Am J Physiol. 1991; 261: C253–C258.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

24. Niiro N, Koga Y, Ikebe M. Agonist-induced changes in the phosphorylation of the myosin-binding subunit of myosin light chain phosphatase and CPI-17, two regulatory factors of myosin light chain phosphatase, in smooth muscle. Biochem J. 2003; 369: 117–128.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

25. Shin HM, Je HD, Gallant C, Tao TC, Hartshorne DJ, Ito M, Morgan KG. Differential association and localization of myosin phosphatase subunits during agonist-induced signal transduction in smooth muscle. Circ Res. 2002; 90: 546–553.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Dirksen WP, Vladic F, Fisher SA. A myosin phosphatase targeting subunit isoform transition defines a smooth muscle developmental phenotypic switch. Am J Physiol. 2000; 278: C589–C600.

27. Woodsome TP, Eto M, Everett A, Brautigan DL, Kitazawa T. Expression of CPI-17 and myosin phosphatase correlates with Ca2+ sensitivity of protein kinase C-induced contraction in rabbit smooth muscle. J Physiol. 2001; 535: 553–564.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

28. Tapon N, Hall A. Rho, Rac and Cdc42 GTPases regulate the organization of the actin cytoskeleton. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1997; 9: 86–92.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

29. Clark EA, King WG, Brugge JS, Symons M, Hynes RO. Integrin-mediated signals regulated by members of the rho family of GTPases. J Cell Biol. 1998; 142: 573–586.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. Tang DD, Wu MF, Opazo Saez AM, Gunst SJ. The focal adhesion protein paxillin regulates contraction in canine tracheal smooth muscle. J Physiol. 2002; 542: 501–513.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. Uehata M, Ishizaki T, Satoh H, Ono T, Kawahara T, Morishita T, Tamakawa H, Yamagami K, Inui J, Maekawa M, Narumiya S. Calcium sensitization of smooth muscle mediated by a Rho-associated protein kinase in hypertension. Nature. 1997; 389: 990–994.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

32. Somlyo AV, Bradshaw D, Ramos S, Murphy C, Myers CE, Somlyo AP. Rho-kinase inhibitor retards migration and in vivo dissemination of human prostate cancer cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000; 269: 652–659.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
P. H. Ratz and A. S. Miner
Role of Protein Kinase C{zeta} and Calcium Entry in KCl-Induced Vascular Smooth Muscle Calcium Sensitization and Feedback Control of Cellular Calcium Levels
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., February 1, 2009; 328(2): 399 - 408.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
R. L. Wardle, M. Gu, Y. Ishida, and R. J. Paul
Rho kinase is an effector underlying Ca2+-desensitizing hypoxic relaxation in porcine coronary artery
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2007; 293(1): H23 - H29.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
S. Hirota, E. Pertens, and L. J. Janssen
The reverse mode of the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger provides a source of Ca2+ for store refilling following agonist-induced Ca2+ mobilization
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, February 1, 2007; 292(2): L438 - L447.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
I. Ito, Y. P. R. Jarajapu, M. B Grant, and H. J Knot
Characteristics of myogenic tone in the rat ophthalmic artery
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2007; 292(1): H360 - H368.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brozovich, F. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brozovich, F. V.
Related Collections
Right arrow Calcium cycling/excitation-contraction coupling
Right arrow Cell signalling/signal transduction