| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Molecular Medicine |
From the Departments of Pathology (H.M., T.M.C., T.K., J.W.B.), Microbiology and Immunology (J.W.B.), and Medicine, Division of Molecular Cardiology (A.W.S.), Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY.
Correspondence to Dr Joan W. Berman, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Department of Pathology, Forchheimer 727, 1300 Morris Park Ave, Bronx, NY 10461. E-mail berman{at}aecom.yu.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: atherosclerosis smooth muscle cells migration integrins cell signaling
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1ß1,
2ß1, and
vß3).1,2 In addition to their adhesive function, integrins also initiate signaling pathways through their ability to activate secondary intracellular signaling molecules, including tyrosine and serine/threonine kinases.3 Integrins and growth factor receptors can induce signaling events that act synergistically to modulate cell function.4 Thus, cross talk between growth factor receptor and integrin signaling pathways can regulate the cellular machinery necessary for directed cell migration. The cytoplasmic tail of most integrin molecules lacks endogenous enzymatic activity, and therefore the recruitment of intracellular adaptor proteins is necessary to connect activated integrins to the cytoskeleton and to cytoplasmic kinases, leading to the formation of focal adhesion complexes.57 Cytoskeletal proteins, including paxillin and vinculin, and the signaling molecules focal adhesion kinase (FAK), proline-rich tyrosine kinase 2 (Pyk2), and phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase (PI3-K) are recruited to focal adhesion complexes during cell migration.8 Nonmigrating cells establish areas of focal contact throughout the cell to maintain stable adhesion to the ECM. When a migratory stimulus is introduced, there is turnover of focal contacts with disassembly of areas of cell-matrix interaction and reestablishment of focal adhesion complexes at the leading edge of cells to allow for cell movement and resistance to contractile forces during migration.9
FAK, a nonreceptor tyrosine kinase, is recruited to focal adhesion complexes and is postulated to integrate growth factor and integrin signals involved in cell migration.7 Pyk2, a member of the FAK family, also localizes to focal adhesion complexes and is activated by multiple stimuli, including growth factors, integrin ligation, and G-proteincoupled receptors.10,11 Both FAK and Pyk2 have been shown to be involved in actin cytoskeleton reorganization and intracellular signaling during cell migration.1214
We recently demonstrated that hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), a mesenchymal-derived protein that regulates the growth and motility of various cell types, is expressed in human atherosclerotic plaques, colocalizing with SMCs, microvascular endothelial cells, and monocytes/macrophages.15 The only known receptor for HGF, c-met, was also expressed by plaque SMCs (unpublished data, 2002), suggesting that these cells can respond to HGF in vivo. In endothelial and epithelial cells, HGF induces cell migration, proliferation, and tubule formation.16,17 Recently it was shown that HGF induces SMC migration in vitro, although the mechanisms involved in the establishment of the migratory phenotype have not been characterized fully.18 In this study, we demonstrated that HGF-mediated SMC migration is dependent on ß1 and ß3 integrins and is characterized by a redistribution of focal adhesions to the leading edges of migrating cells. HGF also induced tyrosine phosphorylation of FAK and Pyk2, as well as their association with ß1 and ß3 integrins, and increased the expression of pro-matrix metalloproteinase-2 (pro-MMP-2). Inhibition of extracellular signalregulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) significantly reduced SMC migration to HGF and also inhibited the redistribution of focal adhesions and the activation of FAK and Pyk2 in HGF-treated SMCs.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
integrin and IHC kit [ECM430]) were purchased from Chemicon. U0126, SB203580, and LY294002 were purchased from Calbiochem.
Migration Assay
Migration assays were performed using 0.1% gelatin-coated Transwell (Corning Costar Corp) 12-well tissue culture inserts with 8-µm pores. SMCs were made quiescent in DMEM plus 0.3% FCS for 48 hours before use. Cells (5x104) in 0.1 mL DMEM were added to the upper chamber, and DMEM, with or without HGF or PDGF, was added to the lower chamber. Inserts were incubated for 6 hours at 37°C with 5% CO2. SMCs that did not migrate were scraped off the membrane, and cells that migrated were fixed with methanol and visualized by staining with autohematoxylin (Invitrogen). Migrated cells were counted in five randomly chosen fields at x200 magnification. Each treatment was performed in duplicate.
To inhibit integrin-matrix interactions, SMCs in suspension were incubated with integrin antibodies or negative control IgGs (10 µg/mL) for 30 minutes before addition to the migration chamber. SMCs were also pretreated (30 minutes) with the inhibitors genistein, UO126, SB203580, or LY294002. Cell viability, as determined by trypan blue staining, was not altered by these pretreatments.
Focal Adhesion Staining
SMCs were plated on 0.1% gelatin-coated coverslips for 24 hours and then incubated in serum-free media for another 24 hours before HGF treatment (25 ng/mL). Cells were fixed and permeabilized with 3.7% formaldehyde/0.2% Triton X-100, blocked with 2% BSA/PBS, and incubated with anti-vinculin antibody (1:200, Sigma) or an isotype-matched, irrelevant IgG (1:100) followed by Cy3-conjugated donkey anti-mouse IgG (1:2000, Jackson Immunoresearch Laboratories, West Grove, Pa). Coverslips were mounted with aqueous mounting media and visualized by confocal microscopy (Bio Rad Radiance 2000 Laser Scanning Confocal microscopy).
Immunoprecipitation and Western Blotting
SMCs were lysed with 1% Nonidet P-40, 50 mmol/L Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 150 mmol/L NaCl, 2 mmol/L EGTA, 0.1 mmol/L Na3VO4, 10 mmol/L NaF, 1 mmol/L PMSF, 50 µL/mL protease inhibitor cocktail for mammalian cell extracts (Sigma), 60 nmol/L okadaic acid, and 40 µmol/L phenylarsine oxide. For immunoprecipitations, antibodies (4 µg) were coupled to protein G-agarose beads and incubated with 400 µg of protein (as determined by Bradford assay) overnight. Beads were pelleted, washed, boiled in sample buffer, and subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Protein lysates (10 or 20 µg) were analyzed by Western blotting with monoclonal antibodies to phosphotyrosine (1:2000, NeoMarkers), FAK, Pyk2 (1:1000, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), ERK1/2, phospho-ERK1/2 (Thr202/Tyr204), p38, phospho-p38 (Thr180/Tyr182), AKT, or phospho-AKT (Ser473) (1:1000, Cell Signaling) followed by chemiluminescence detection (Perkin Elmer).
Integrin Antibody Array Analysis
Antibodies (0.5 µg) against integrin subunits
1 through
6,
v, ß1, and activated ß1 (ß1A) (Chemicon) were immobilized on PVDF membranes. Membranes were blocked, incubated with protein lysates (0.25 mg/mL) from untreated or HGF-treated (25 ng/mL) SMCs (15 minutes), and immunoblotted with HRP-labeled FAK antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). FAK-integrin association was detected by chemiluminescence.
Gelatin Zymography
SMCs, cultured in serum-free media for 24 hours, were treated with different concentrations of HGF (diluted in 0.1% BSA/PBS) for 24 hours, and control cultures were treated with equivalent amounts of 0.1% BSA/PBS alone. MMP activity in conditioned media was determined by zymography.20 Briefly, conditioned media was collected and supernatant proteins were precipitated with an equal volume of cold acetone, pelleted, and resuspended in PBS. Samples (1 µg) were loaded onto 7.5% SDS-polyacrylamide gels containing 0.1% gelatin. After electrophoresis, gels were washed in 2.5% Triton X-100 and incubated at 37°C in development buffer (50 mmol/L Tris, 200 mmol/L NaCl, 5 mmol/L CaCl2, and 0.02% Brij) overnight. Gels were stained with 0.2% Coomassie blue and destained (30% methanol and 10% acetic acid). Gel Images were captured digitally using the Fluorchem Imaging System (Alpha Innotech Corporation).
Statistical Analysis
Data are presented as mean±SEM. Statistical analysis was performed using a paired one-tailed Students t test. Values of P
0.05 were considered significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Integrin-Mediated Migration
SMCs express the ß1, ß3, ß4, and ß5 as well as the
1 through
6 and
V integrin subunits.22 HGF-induced SMC migration occurred only on matrix-coated inserts and not on uncoated inserts (data not shown); therefore, we performed an initial characterization of the specific integrins involved in the migratory response of SMCs to HGF. SMCs were pretreated with integrin subunit antibodies (ß1 through ß5,
1 through
6,
V) (10 µg/mL) or with negative control IgGs before their addition to gelatin-coated inserts. Inhibition of ß1 or ß3 significantly inhibited HGF-induced SMC migration (Figure 2). Antibodies to ß2, ß4, or ß5 did not inhibit HGF-induced migration. Integrins containing ß1 and ß3 chains, such as
1ß1,
2ß1,
Vß3,
4ß1, and
5ß1, are largely responsible for cellular adhesion to different types of collagen.1,2 Anti-
1-6 and anti-
V antibodies and negative control IgGs had no effect in the transmigration assays (data not shown). Additional attempts to inhibit integrin-matrix interactions by increasing antibody concentrations or by treating with both ß1 and ß3 antibodies resulted in nonspecific inhibition of migration with the negative control antibodies (data not shown).
|
HGF Induces Redistribution of Focal Adhesions
To determine whether HGF induces the redistribution of focal adhesions to the leading edges of migrating cells, HGF-treated SMCs were examined by confocal microscopy for focal adhesion localization, as identified by vinculin immunofluorescence. Untreated SMCs had a homogeneous distribution of focal adhesions (Figure 3A). After the addition of HGF for 15 minutes, there was an overall decrease in the number of focal adhesions as well as redistribution to the leading edges of cells (arrows) (Figure 3B). This effect was transient, because focal adhesions were more evenly distributed throughout the cell by 30 minutes (data not shown), and by 3 hours the distribution of focal adhesions in HGF-treated SMCs (Figure 3D) appeared similar to that of control cells (Figure 3C).
|
HGF Induces FAK and Pyk2 Phosphorylation
FAK is an important component of focal adhesions. PDGF, a potent inducer of SMC migration, stimulates the phosphorylation of FAK and paxillin, and these phosphorylation events correlate with the migratory response of several cell types to chemotactic factors.23 Pyk2 is also expressed by SMC and phosphorylates paxillin.24 To determine whether FAK or Pyk2 is activated in HGF-treated SMCs, FAK and Pyk2 were immunoprecipitated from HGF-treated SMCs and analyzed by Western blotting with a phosphotyrosine antibody. HGF treatment for 5 minutes resulted in increased levels of phosphorylated FAK, which remained elevated to a lesser extent after 15 minutes of treatment (Figure 4) and returned to baseline levels by 30 minutes (data not shown). The time course of HGF-induced FAK phosphorylation correlated with the redistribution of focal adhesions in HGF-treated SMCs. HGF-induced Pyk2 phosphorylation was similar to FAK (Figure 4).
|
HGF Increases FAK and Pyk2 Association With ß1 and ß3 Integrins
During migration, focal adhesion formation involves many proteins, including integrins, that bind to the ECM as well as to intracellular signaling molecules such as FAK and Pyk2.2527 We demonstrated that HGF-induced migration is dependent on either ß1 or ß3 integrin interactions with gelatin and that HGF induces the phosphorylation of FAK and Pyk2. Therefore, we examined whether HGF treatment of SMCs resulted in the association of FAK or Pyk2 with these integrins. Immunoprecipitation of ß1 or ß3 integrins indicates that there is an increased association of FAK and Pyk2 with both integrins after HGF treatment for 5 minutes (Figure 5A). In addition, an immunoprecipitation assay using an antibody array consisting of
and ß1 integrin antibodies bound to PVDF membranes was performed to additionally characterize integrin-FAK interactions in HGF-treated cells. Arrays were incubated with protein lysates from untreated or HGF-treated (15 minutes) SMCs followed by immunoblotting with a FAK antibody (Figure 5B). Increased levels of FAK were associated with activated ß1 (ß1A) and
1,
6, and
v integrins in HGF-treated cells compared with untreated cells, as quantified by densitometry (Figure 5C). These data suggest that FAK and Pyk2 recruitment to ß1, ß3,
1,
6, or
v integrins may contribute to HGF-induced SMC migration.
|
HGF-Mediated Migration Is Dependent on ERK1/2, p38, and PI3-K
We demonstrated that FAK and Pyk2 are activated in HGF-treated SMCs. FAK and Pyk2 are proposed to function as regulators of the ERK1/2 signaling pathway in SMCs.12,28,29 PDGF-induced migration of SMCs has been shown to be dependent on the activation of ERK1/2.28 To determine whether ERK1/2 activation is involved in HGF-induced SMC migration, cells were pretreated with the ERK1/2 inhibitor, U0126, and migration assays were performed. ERK1/2 inhibition significantly reduced HGF-mediated SMC migration (Figure 6A). SMCs were also pretreated with genistein, a general tyrosine kinase inhibitor, to confirm the specificity of HGF signaling through its tyrosine kinase receptor, c-met. Genistein completely inhibited HGF-induced SMC migration (Figure 6A). The level of SMC migration was lower than in previous experiments and is most likely attributable to differences in HGF preparations (HGF from Sigma induced less SMC migration compared with HGF from Genentech). Western blot analysis showed that increased ERK1/2 phosphorylation in SMCs treated with HGF was detected at 1 minute, with maximal increases occurring from 3 to 15 minutes of treatment (Figure 6B). UO126 abrogated HGF-induced (15-minute) ERK1/2 phosphorylation.
|
Additional signaling molecules, including p38 and PI3-K, have been shown to be involved in HGF-induced migration of other cell types. To determine the role of p38 and PI3-K in HGF-mediated SMC migration, assays were performed with cells pretreated with the p38 inhibitor SB203580 or the PI3-K inhibitor LY294002. Inhibition of p38 or PI3-K significantly reduced HGF-induced migration (Figure 6A). Western blot analyses were performed to determine whether p38 or PI3-K activation was involved in the HGF-induced activation of ERK1/2 in SMCs. Figure 6C illustrates that HGF induced the phosphorylation of p38 and AKT, a downstream substrate of PI3-K. Inhibition of either p38 or PI3-K did not block ERK1/2 phosphorylation in HGF-treated SMCs (Figure 6C).
ERK1/2-Dependent Focal Adhesion Redistribution
Studies have suggested that activated ERK1/2 is associated with focal adhesion complexes.11,30,31 We examined whether inhibition of ERK1/2 affected the redistribution of focal adhesion complexes after HGF stimulation. Figure 7B illustrates HGF-induced redistribution of focal adhesions. When SMCs were pretreated with U0126, the redistribution of focal adhesion complexes was inhibited, in particular the disassembly of existing focal adhesions (Figure 7D). Because FAK and Pyk2 are regulators of focal adhesion activity, we examined whether ERK1/2 inhibition affected HGF-induced FAK and Pyk2 activation. Pretreatment of SMCs with U0126 resulted in minimal but reproducible decreases in the activation of FAK and Pyk2 (Figure 7E).
|
HGF Induces Pro-MMP-2 From SMCs
SMC migration is facilitated by MMPs.20,32 Thus, we examined whether HGF could induce the production of the gelatinase, MMP-2. HGF treatment resulted in increased pro-MMP-2 expression, as determined by zymography, compared with control cultures treated with an amount of BSA equivalent to that added to each HGF treatment group (Figure 8).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
SMC migration in vivo occurs in an ECM composed of proteins that can modulate SMC function through interactions with cell-surface adhesion molecules. Binding of ECM proteins by their respective cell-surface receptors is believed to have more than an anchoring effect. Integrin-mediated binding of matrix proteins results in activation of signal transduction pathways that are important for SMC migration.4 We found in this study that HGF-induced SMC migration occurs on gelatin (denatured collagen)-coated inserts. Increased expression of collagens has been demonstrated in atherosclerotic plaques, and they are often a major component of the fibrous cap.21
SMCs express several integrin subsets that interact with collagen. We examined which subset of integrins that can bind to gelatin/collagen is involved in HGF-induced migration. Our studies demonstrated that inhibition of ß1 or ß3 integrin interactions significantly reduced the migratory effects of HGF on SMCs. Pretreatment of cells with ß1 or ß3 integrin antibodies either directly inhibited migration or inhibited adhesion to the matrix, resulting in an indirect inhibition of migration. Inhibition of individual
subunits did not affect HGF-induced SMC migration, suggesting that ß1 or ß3 integrins with different
subunits may interact with gelatin, providing redundancy in the
subunit contribution to integrin-mediated regulation of SMC migration. Alternatively, the
subunit of ß1 or ß3 integrins may not contribute to the induction of the migratory phenotype elicited by HGF. Integrin inhibition in vivo results in a decrease in neointimal formation after vascular injury,34 underscoring the importance of integrin-mediated migration in atherosclerosis. Recent studies have shown that HGF can affect integrin avidity to matrix proteins as well as upregulate integrin levels, suggesting that HGF may affect integrin-mediated migration in several ways.35
HGF-induced migration is dependent on a redistribution of focal adhesion complexes in epithelial and carcinoma cell lines.3638 We examined whether HGF induced the formation or redistribution of focal adhesions in SMCs. Focal adhesions are a complex of proteins that link the ECM to the cytoskeleton of the cell through integrin-mediated associations. We demonstrated that HGF induces a redistribution of focal adhesions in SMCs. This process allows migrating cells to attach to the ECM at the leading edge and to detach from the trailing edge. Our data also suggest that HGF-induced activation of ERK1/2 plays a role in the disassembly of existing focal adhesions, possibly through activation of FAK and Pyk2. HGF-induced FAK phosphorylation in epithelial cells was previously shown to be dependent on ERK1/2 activation.37 The time course of ERK1/2 phosphorylation in HGF-treated SMCs suggests that ERK1/2 may contribute to the activation of FAK and Pyk2. ERK1/2 phosphorylation is induced after 1 minute of HGF treatment, and this early activation may contribute to the phosphorylation of FAK and Pyk2, which precedes the redistribution of SMC focal adhesions.
Studies of HGF-mediated migration in tumor cells demonstrated that FAK activation plays a role in cell migration as well as the activation of other signaling proteins, such as PI3-K, ERK1/2, and p38.3640 We demonstrated that HGF induces FAK activation in SMCs, and an in vivo study documented FAK activation in SMCs during neointimal hyperplasia.41 These findings suggest that FAK, in addition to integrins, may be a mediator of HGF-induced migration. FAK has been shown to link the cytoplasmic domain of ß1 integrins to focal adhesions, implicating FAK as a link between ß1 integrin activation and focal adhesion formation in HGF-treated cells.7,8 Because we have shown that HGF-induced migration of SMCs is dependent on ß1 integrins, the redistribution of focal adhesions that occurs after HGF stimulation may be dependent on FAK activation.
ERK1/2 inhibition significantly reduced SMC migration to HGF. ERK1/2 is required for PDGF-induced SMC migration.28 Once activated, ERK1/2 has been shown to regulate integrin levels in MDCK cells.42 Activation of ERK1/2 by growth factors can lead to the subsequent activation of myosin light chain kinase, which facilitates cell contractility and migration.43 Our data suggest that ERK1/2 activity is also important in regulating the redistribution of focal adhesions during cell migration, and this MAPK may affect the phosphorylation of FAK and Pyk2. However, because ERK1/2 inhibition did not completely abolish HGF-induced SMC migration, it suggests that there are other signal transduction pathways involved in HGF-induced SMC migration. Additional signaling molecules reported to play important roles in cell migration include p3844 and PI3-K.45,46 Inhibition of either of these signaling pathways also significantly inhibited HGF-induced SMC migration. However, ERK1/2 activation seems to be independent of p38 and PI3-K, because SB203580 or LY294002 does not inhibit HGF-induced ERK1/2 phosphorylation. These data suggest that ERK1/2 signaling events involved in HGF-mediated SMC migration may not require p38 or PI3-K.
Migration of cells surrounded by ECM is facilitated by MMPs, and HGF has been shown to induce endothelial cell production of MMPs. However, its effects on MMP production by SMCs were unknown.47 Our data show that HGF can induce the production of pro-MMP-2. Expression of MMP-2 in atherosclerotic plaques has been previously demonstrated.20,48 MMP-2 degrades gelatin/collagen, a major component of the fibrous cap, suggesting that it may participate in plaque instability or rupture. Thus, HGF may contribute to plaque instability by inducing the production of MMPs from SMCs. Conversely, HGF may stabilize the plaque by recruiting more SMCs to the neointima, which then secrete collagen, contributing to fibrous cap formation.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
This work was supported by National Institutes of Mental Health grant MH52974, National Institutes of Health grant NS11920, and the National Institutes of Health Medical Scientist Training Program.
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Yamamoto K, Yamamoto M. Cell adhesion receptors for native and denatured type I collagens and fibronectin in rabbit arterial smooth muscle cells in culture. Exp Cell Res. 1994; 214: 258263.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Schwartz MA. Integrin signaling revisited. Trends Cell Biol. 2001; 11: 466470.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Eliceiri BP. Integrin and growth factor receptor crosstalk. Circ Res. 2001; 89: 11041110.
5. Burridge K, Fath K, Kelly T, Nuckolls G, Turner C. Focal adhesions: transmembrane junctions between the extracellular matrix and the cytoskeleton. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1988; 4: 487525.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Beviglia L, Kramer RH. HGF induces FAK activation and integrin-mediated adhesion in MTLn3 breast carcinoma cells. Int J Cancer. 1999; 83: 640649.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Sieg DJ, Hauck CR, Ilic D, Klingbeil CK, Schaefer E, Damsky CH, Schlaepfer DD. FAK integrates growth-factor and integrin signals to promote cell migration. Nat Cell Biol. 2000; 2: 249256.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Gerthoffer WT, Gunst SJ. Invited review: focal adhesion and small heat shock proteins in the regulation of actin remodeling and contractility in smooth muscle. J Appl Physiol. 2001; 91: 963972.
9. Choquet D, Felsenfeld DP, Sheetz MP. Extracellular matrix rigidity causes strengthening of integrin-cytoskeleton linkages. Cell. 1997; 88: 3948.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Fuortes M, Melchior M, Han H, Lyon GJ, Nathan C. Role of the tyrosine kinase pyk2 in the integrin-dependent activation of human neutrophils by TNF. J Clin Invest. 1999; 104: 327335.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Litvak V, Tian D, Shaul YD, Lev S. Targeting of PYK2 to focal adhesions as a cellular mechanism for convergence between integrins and G protein-coupled receptor signaling cascades. J Biol Chem. 2000; 275: 3273632746.
12. Blaschke F, Stawowy P, Kappert K, Goetze S, Kintscher U, Wollert-Wulf B, Fleck E, Graf K. Angiotensin II-augmented migration of VSMCs towards PDGF-BB involves Pyk2 and ERK 1/2 activation. Basic Res Cardiol. 2002; 97: 334342.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Du QS, Ren XR, Xie Y, Wang Q, Mei L, Xiong WC. Inhibition of PYK2-induced actin cytoskeleton reorganization, PYK2 autophosphorylation and focal adhesion targeting by FAK. J Cell Sci. 2001; 114: 29772987.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Li S, Butler P, Wang Y, Hu Y, Han DC, Usami S, Guan JL, Chien S. The role of the dynamics of focal adhesion kinase in the mechanotaxis of endothelial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99: 35463451.
15. Ma H, Calderon TM, Fallon JT, Berman JW. Hepatocyte growth factor is a survival factor for endothelial cells and is expressed in human atherosclerotic plaques. Atherosclerosis. 2002; 164: 7987.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Morimoto A, Okamura K, Hamanaka R, Sato Y, Shima N, Higashio K, Kuwano M. Hepatocyte growth factor modulates migration and proliferation of human microvascular endothelial cells in culture. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1991; 179: 10421049.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Rosen EM, Grant DS, Kleinman HK, Goldberg ID, Bhargava MM, Nickoloff BJ, Kinsella JL, Polverini P. Scatter factor (hepatocyte growth factor) is a potent angiogenesis factor in vivo. Symp Soc Exp Biol. 1993; 47: 227234.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Aoyagi M, Yamamoto S, Azuma H, Yamamoto M, Tamaki M, Niimi Y, Hirakawa K, Yamamoto K. Localization and effects of hepatocyte growth factor on smooth muscle cells during neointimal formation after balloon denudation. Histochem Cell Biol. 1999; 111: 419428.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Taubman MB. Tissue factor regulation in vascular smooth muscle: a summary of studies performed using in vivo and in vitro models. Am J Cardiol. 1993; 72: 55C60C.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Schonbeck U, Mach F, Sukhova GK, Murphy C, Bonnefoy JY, Fabunmi RP, Libby P. Regulation of matrix metalloproteinase expression in human vascular smooth muscle cells by T lymphocytes: a role for CD40 signaling in plaque rupture? Circ Res. 1997; 81: 448454.
21. Amento EP, Ehsani N, Palmer H, Libby P. Cytokines and growth factors positively and negatively regulate interstitial collagen gene expression in human vascular smooth muscle cells. Arterioscler Thromb. 1991; 11: 12231230.
22. Moiseeva EP. Adhesion receptors of vascular smooth muscle cells and their functions. Cardiovasc Res. 2001; 52: 372386.
23. Abedi H, Dawes KE, Zachary I. Differential effects of platelet-derived growth factor BB on p125 focal adhesion kinase and paxillin tyrosine phosphorylation and on cell migration in rabbit aortic vascular smooth muscle cells and Swiss 3T3 fibroblasts. J Biol Chem. 1995; 270: 1136711376.
24. Turner CE. Paxillin. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 1998; 30: 955959.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Schwartz MA, Ginsberg MH. Networks and crosstalk: integrin signalling spreads. Nat Cell Biol. 2002; 4: E65E68.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Schwartz MA, Assoian RK. Integrins and cell proliferation: regulation of cyclin-dependent kinases via cytoplasmic signaling pathways. J Cell Sci. 2001; 114: 25532560.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Juliano RL, Aplin AE, Howe AK, Short S, Lee JW, Alahari S. Integrin regulation of receptor tyrosine kinase and G protein-coupled receptor signaling to mitogen-activated protein kinases. Methods Enzymol. 2001; 333: 151163.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Hauck CR, Hsia DA, Schlaepfer DD. Focal adhesion kinase facilitates platelet-derived growth factor-BB-stimulated ERK2 activation required for chemotaxis migration of vascular smooth muscle cells. J Biol Chem. 2000; 275: 4109241099.
29. Rocic P, Govindarajan G, Sabri A, Lucchesi PA. A role for PYK2 in regulation of ERK1/2 MAP kinases and PI 3-kinase by ANG II in vascular smooth muscle. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2001; 280: C90C99.
30. Brunton VG, Fincham VJ, McLean GW, Winder SJ, Paraskeva C, Marshall JF, Frame MC. The protrusive phase and full development of integrin-dependent adhesions in colon epithelial cells require FAK- and ERK-mediated actin spike formation: deregulation in cancer cells. Neoplasia. 2001; 3: 215226.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Fincham VJ, James M, Frame MC, Winder SJ. Active ERK/MAP kinase is targeted to newly forming cell-matrix adhesions by integrin engagement and v-Src. EMBO J. 2000; 19: 29112923.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Pauly RR, Passaniti A, Bilato C, Monticone R, Cheng L, Papadopoulos N, Gluzband YA, Smith L, Weinstein C, Lakatta EG, et al. Migration of cultured vascular smooth muscle cells through a basement membrane barrier requires type IV collagenase activity and is inhibited by cellular differentiation. Circ Res. 1994; 75: 4154.
33. Ross R. The pathogenesis of atherosclerosis: a perspective for the 1990s. Nature. 1993; 362: 801809.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Matsuno H, Stassen JM, Vermylen J, Deckmyn H. Inhibition of integrin function by a cyclic RGD-containing peptide prevents neointima formation. Circulation. 1994; 90: 22032206.
35. Trusolino L, Cavassa S, Angelini P, Ando M, Bertotti A, Comoglio PM, Boccaccio C. HGF/scatter factor selectively promotes cell invasion by increasing integrin avidity. FASEB J. 2000; 14: 16291640.
36. Lai JF, Kao SC, Jiang ST, Tang MJ, Chan PC, Chen HC. Involvement of focal adhesion kinase in hepatocyte growth factor-induced scatter of Madin-Darby canine kidney cells. J Biol Chem. 2000; 275: 74747480.
37. Liu ZX, Yu CF, Nickel C, Thomas S, Cantley LG. Hepatocyte growth factor induces ERK-dependent paxillin phosphorylation and regulates paxillin-focal adhesion kinase association. J Biol Chem. 2002; 277: 1045210458.
38. Matsumoto K, Nakamura T, Kramer RH. Hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor induces tyrosine phosphorylation of focal adhesion kinase (p125FAK) and promotes migration and invasion by oral squamous cell carcinoma cells. J Biol Chem. 1994; 269: 3180731813.
39. Delehedde M, Sergeant N, Lyon M, Rudland PS, Fernig DG. Hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor stimulates migration of rat mammary fibroblasts through both mitogen-activated protein kinase and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt pathways. Eur J Biochem. 2001; 268: 44234429.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Sipeki S, Bander E, Buday L, Farkas G, Bacsy E, Ways DK, Farago A. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase contributes to Erk1/Erk2 MAP kinase activation associated with hepatocyte growth factor-induced cell scattering. Cell Signal. 1999; 11: 885890.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41. Owens LV, Xu L, Marston WA, Yang X, Farber MA, Iacocca MV, Cance WG, Keagy BA. Overexpression of the focal adhesion kinase (p125FAK) in the vascular smooth muscle cells of intimal hyperplasia. J Vasc Surg. 2001; 34: 344349.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
42. Liang CC, Chen HC. Sustained activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase stimulated by hepatocyte growth factor leads to integrin
2 expression that is involved in cell scattering. J Biol Chem. 2001; 276: 2114621152.
43. Klemke RL, Cai S, Giannini AL, Gallagher PJ, de Lanerolle P, Cheresh DA. Regulation of cell motility by mitogen-activated protein kinase. J Cell Biol. 1997; 137: 481492.
44. Rousseau S, Houle F, Landry J, Huot J. p38 MAP kinase activation by vascular endothelial growth factor mediates actin reorganization and cell migration in human endothelial cells. Oncogene. 1997; 15: 21692177.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
45. Bhargavi V, Chari VB, Singh SS. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase binds to profilin through the p85
subunit and regulates cytoskeletal assembly. Biochem Mol Biol Int. 1998; 46: 241248.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
46. Mercurio AM, Rabinovitz I, Shaw LM. The
6ß4 integrin and epithelial cell migration. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2001; 13: 541545.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
47. Wang H, Keiser JA. Hepatocyte growth factor enhances MMP activity in human endothelial cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000; 272: 900905.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
48. Galis ZS, Sukhova GK, Lark MW, Libby P. Increased expression of matrix metalloproteinases and matrix degrading activity in vulnerable regions of human atherosclerotic plaques. J Clin Invest. 1994; 94: 24932503.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. Yamamoto, T. Matsuura, G. Narazaki, M. Sugitani, K. Tanaka, A. Maeda, G. Shiota, K. Sato, A. Yoshida, and I. Hisatome Synergistic effects of autologous cell and hepatocyte growth factor gene therapy for neovascularization in a murine model of hindlimb ischemia Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, October 1, 2009; 297(4): H1329 - H1336. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. W. Waldo, Y. Li, C. Buono, B. Zhao, E. M. Billings, J. Chang, and H. S. Kruth Heterogeneity of Human Macrophages in Culture and in Atherosclerotic Plaques Am. J. Pathol., April 1, 2008; 172(4): 1112 - 1126. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. H. Lee, U. S. Kayyali, A. M. Sousa, T. Rajan, R. J. Lechleider, and R. M. Day Transforming Growth Factor-beta1 Effects on Endothelial Monolayer Permeability Involve Focal Adhesion Kinase/Src Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., October 1, 2007; 37(4): 485 - 493. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. Grifoni, K. P. Gannon, D. E. Stec, and H. A. Drummond ENaC proteins contribute to VSMC migration Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2006; 291(6): H3076 - H3086. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Li, H. Tanaka, H. H. Wang, S. Yoshiyama, H. Kumagai, A. Nakamura, D. L. Brown, S. E. Thatcher, G. L. Wright, and K. Kohama Intracellular signal transduction for migration and actin remodeling in vascular smooth muscle cells after sphingosylphosphorylcholine stimulation Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2006; 291(3): H1262 - H1272. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Kobayashi, L. M. DeBusk, Y. O. Babichev, D. J. Dumont, and P. C. Lin Hepatocyte growth factor mediates angiopoietin-induced smooth muscle cell recruitment Blood, August 15, 2006; 108(4): 1260 - 1266. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. McKinnon, E. Gherardi, M. Reidy, and D. Bowyer Hepatocyte Growth Factor/Scatter Factor and MET Are Involved in Arterial Repair and Atherogenesis Am. J. Pathol., January 1, 2006; 168(1): 340 - 348. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. I. Rotmans, J. M.M. Heyligers, H. J.M. Verhagen, E. Velema, M. M. Nagtegaal, D. P.V. de Kleijn, F. G. de Groot, E. S.G. Stroes, and G. Pasterkamp In Vivo Cell Seeding With Anti-CD34 Antibodies Successfully Accelerates Endothelialization but Stimulates Intimal Hyperplasia in Porcine Arteriovenous Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene Grafts Circulation, July 5, 2005; 112(1): 12 - 18. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kanematsu, S. Yamamoto, E. Iwai-Kanai, I. Kanatani, M. Imamura, R. M. Adam, Y. Tabata, and O. Ogawa Induction of Smooth Muscle Cell-Like Phenotype in Marrow-Derived Cells among Regenerating Urinary Bladder Smooth Muscle Cells Am. J. Pathol., February 1, 2005; 166(2): 565 - 573. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Research Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2003 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |