Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation Research
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation Research. 2003;93:77-85
Published online before print May 29, 2003, doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000079488.91342.B7
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
93/1/77    most recent
01.RES.0000079488.91342.B7v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reckova, M.
Right arrow Articles by Sedmera, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reckova, M.
Right arrow Articles by Sedmera, D.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Related Collections
Right arrow Electrophysiology
Right arrow Animal models of human disease
Right arrow Arrythmias-basic studies
Right arrow Cardiac development
(Circulation Research. 2003;93:77.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.


Integrative Physiology

Hemodynamics Is a Key Epigenetic Factor in Development of the Cardiac Conduction System

Maria Reckova, Carlin Rosengarten, Angela deAlmeida, Chiffvon P. Stanley, Andy Wessels, Robert G. Gourdie, Robert P. Thompson, David Sedmera

From the Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.

Correspondence to David Sedmera, Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, Medical University of South Carolina, 173 Ashley Ave, BSB 601, Charleston, SC 29425. E-mail sedmerad{at}musc.edu


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
The His-Purkinje system (HPS) is a network of conduction cells responsible for coordinating the contraction of the ventricles. Earlier studies using bipolar electrodes indicated that the functional maturation of the HPS in the chick embryo is marked by a topological shift in the sequence of activation of the ventricle. Namely, at around the completion of septation, an immature base-to-apex sequence of ventricular activation was reported to convert to the apex-to-base pattern characteristic of the mature heart. Previously, we have proposed that hemodynamics and/or mechanical conditioning may be key epigenetic factors in development of the HPS. We thus hypothesized that the timing of the topological shift marking maturation of the conduction system is sensitive to variation in hemodynamic load. Spatiotemporal patterns of ventricular activation (as revealed by high-speed imaging of fluorescent voltage-sensitive dye) were mapped in chick hearts over normal development, and following procedures previously characterized as causing increased (conotruncal banding, CTB) or reduced (left atrial ligation, LAL) hemodynamic loading of the embryonic heart. The results revealed that the timing of the shift to mature activation displays striking plasticity. CTB led to precocious emergence of mature HPS function relative to controls whereas LAL was associated with delayed conversion to apical initiation. The results from our study indicate a critical role for biophysical factors in differentiation of specialized cardiac tissues and provide the basis of a new model for studies of the molecular mechanisms involved in induction and patterning of the HPS in vivo.


Key Words: chick embryo • His-Purkinje system • heart development • optical mapping


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
The His-Purkinje system (HPS) is a specialized network of conduction tissues that ensures coordinated and reliable activation of the ventricular myocardium. Dysfunction of this essential network of specialized cardiac tissues is linked to ventricular arrhythmia and sudden cardiac death in both adults and children. To give a recent example, Purkinje fibers were mapped as the predominant origin of arrhythmias in human patients with recurrent idiopathic ventricular fibrillation.1 The relationship between the anatomical structure of the HPS and its electrophysiological characteristics during the normal cardiac cycle has now been understood for nearly a century (summarized and put in perspective in Suma2). After activation of the atria by the sinoatrial (SA) node, propagating electrical impulse exits from the atrioventricular (AV) node and is spread rapidly into the left and right ventricles via the bundle of His, its branched limbs and networks of Purkinje fibers ramifying from the bundle branches. The larger fascicles of the HPS (ie, the His bundle and bundle branches) are insulated from surrounding muscle as they course from the crest of the septum toward the ventricular apex. This insulation breaks down within the peripheral networks of Purkinje fibers, enabling direct electrotonic coupling between the HPS and working myocardium at so-called Purkinje-myocyte junctions. As a consequence of this arrangement, activation of the working muscle of the ventricle, and its ensuing contraction, proceed initially from the ventricular apex. This apex-to-base sequence of excitation and contraction is thought to increase ventricular pumping efficiency and stands as an important marker of mature HPS function.

The development of mature HPS function in the embryo demonstrates a conserved pattern that is linked to significant phases of cardiac morphogenesis. Initially, cardiac impulse propagates in a linear, isotropic sequence from the sinus venosus at the most caudal portion of the tubular heart, toward the cranially located outflow tract.3 The isotropy of activation speed changes through looping of the tubular heart, with faster conducting segments corresponding to the primitive atria and ventricle becoming apparent.4 While the speed of impulse propagation increases, the actual sequence of activation within the undivided ventricles still follows the craniocaudal direction of blood flow. In practice, this means that activation first descends from the AV junction along the wall down the primitive left ventricle toward the apex and then ascends along the early right ventricle toward the outflow tract, resulting in an apparent base-to-apex sequence of excitation spread. Near the completion of ventricular septation in the embryonic chick heart, a distinct shift in the topology of ventricular activation emerges. The immature base-to-apex sequence of left ventricular activation undergoes an apparent reversal, altering rapidly to an apex-to-base pattern. This shift marks the emergence of mature "apex-first" epicardial breakthrough near the termini of the right and left bundle branches of the HPS.

Previously, we hypothesized a role for biophysical factors in differentiation of specialized cardiac tissues; either from effects of physical conditioning5,6 or through hemodynamic-induced molecular signaling cascades.7,8 We decided to test these assumptions on previously characterized in vivo models in which hemodynamic loading of the ventricle was either increased or decreased.9–12 This analysis revealed that the timing of emergence of apex-first activation shows a striking dependence on hemodynamic load; conversion from the immature to the mature pattern of ventricular activation was accelerated by increased loading and delayed by decreased load. The results from this study confirm the key importance of biophysical forces in the differentiation of the HPS in vivo.


*    Materials and Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Materials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Egg Incubation and Embryo Staging
Fertilized White Leghorn chicken eggs (ISE, Newberry, SC) were incubated blunt end up in a 38°C forced-draft incubator to Hamburger-Hamilton stages (HH) 16 to 36.13 These stages were selected to cover normal ventricular activation development from immature looping to mature four-chamber heart.

Conotruncal Banding (CTB) and Left Atrial Ligation (LAL)
The embryonic surgical procedures were performed essentially as described.11 For details, see the expanded Materials and Methods section in the data supplement, available online at http://www. circresaha.org. Since the surviving sham-operated embryos from both procedures appeared normal and did not differ from intact embryos in HH stage or other measured parameters, they were pooled together as controls. Typical phenotype of hearts exposed to CTB or LAL was evaluated macroscopically as described previously11; only hearts with clearly developed morphological phenotype were used for further analysis (n>=6).

Optical Mapping
Optical mapping was performed essentially as described in detail previously.14 For details, see the expanded Materials and Methods section in the data supplement, available online at http://www.circresaha.org.

Immunohistochemistry
After the recordings, the isolated control or experimental hearts were photographed, fixed in Dent’s fixative (80% methanol/20% DMSO), processed into paraffin, and serially sectioned at 8 µm for immunohistochemical detection of early markers of ventricular conduction system (PSA-NCAM, clone 5A5, fresh ascites fluid, from Developmental Studies Hybridoma bank15 and {alpha}-myosin heavy chain, clone 169-1A6,16 shown to stain developing ventricular conduction system in the avian heart in a manner described by Sanders et al.17 Imaging was carried out on Leica TCS SP2 AOBS confocal microscope.

Cell Birth-Dating Study With Tritiated Thymidine
See the expanded Materials and Methods section in the data supplement, available online at http://www.circresaha.org.

Statistical Analysis
For statistical analysis of treatment effects, we used Pearson’s {chi}2 test. A value of P<0.05 was considered significant.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Optical Mapping of the Embryonic Chick Heart Confirms the Occurrence of a Distinct Shift in Topology of Ventricular Activation at Septation
Earlier studies using bipolar electrodes indicated that the functional maturation of the HPS in the chick embryo is marked by a distinctive shift in the sequence of activation at the ventricular epicardial surface.18 Our initial goal was to use optical mapping and voltage-sensitive dye to confirm the occurrence of this shift and to characterize the overall changes in ventricular activation pattern that accompanied it. We thus studied patterns of ventricular activation during chick embryonic development from HH 16 to 36. In the chick heart in anterior view, the right ventricle comprises the substantive ventricular part.19,20 Thus, when studying left ventricular activation transition, dorsal view is the most informative. At the earliest stages studied (HH 16 to 17), we observed deceleration of activation in the AV canal and outflow tract regions and acceleration of activation in the ventricle consistent with the previous report of de Jong and coworkers4 (Figure 1). Specifically, within the ventricle, the rapid propagation of impulse appeared to distribute along trabecular ridges organized radially from the AV junction to the outer curvature of the looped, tubular heart. Mapping of the endocardial surface in open hearts suggested that radially arranged trabeculae (Figure 1) continued to account for base-to-apex sequences of activation through to HH 34, when the last examples of hearts demonstrating the immature pattern were observed. Nonetheless, a change from the immature base-to-apex sequence to more mature patterns was first observed starting at HH 29 when a small proportion of mapped hearts demonstrated ventricular activation from two foci, one at the left ventricular base and the other at the apex of the right ventricle (Figure 2a). From HH 31, the proportion of hearts demonstrating this intermediate phenotype increased; however, a growing number of hearts also demonstrated initiation of activation from a single apical focus. This single focus was observed near the right ventricular apex, slightly above the interventricular groove (Figure 2b), a localization confirmed by imaging the right ventricle from the side (data not shown). The proportion of hearts demonstrating such mature apex-first patterns continued to increase from HH 31, encompassing 100% of hearts by HH 36 (Figure 2d). Interestingly, as development proceeded, even the mature pattern demonstrated addition of further complexity, with a second apical focus becoming apparent at the presumptive termination of the left bundle branch from HH 35 in an increasing number of hearts (Figure 2c and online movies, available in the data supplement). Specifically, 2 of 6 hearts and 9 of 16 hearts demonstrating the mature apex-first pattern had breakthrough at both right and left apical foci at HH 35 and 36, respectively.



View larger version (99K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Activation sequence of chick embryonic heart. a, Confocal projection of phalloidin-stained heart at HH 17. Note emerging trabeculae (*) in the ventricular apex. Scale bar=100 µm. b, Labeled image of HH 17 heart from the high-speed camera (dorsal view) with isochrones in 2-ms intervals showing ventricular surface activation. A indicates atrium, AV, atrioventricular canal, V, ventricle, and Ct, conotruncus. c, Time-lapse recording of action potential (first derivative of the filtered data) spread through this looped tubular heart. Bright pixels indicate passing of the activation wavefront. The frame interval is 2 ms. Note slow conduction through the AV canal, fast through the ventricle, and slow again through the conotruncus (individual segments indicated by arrowheads). d, Examples of raw optical recordings of action potential from different heart compartments ("virtual electrode" positions are indicated by color-coded squares in b). Note the contraction artifact in the atrial trace and slower upstroke velocity in the AV and Ct regions. e, Mapping of endocardial activation reveals radial spread of action potential through the trabecular network. Heart at HH 31 was dissected in the frontal plane and imaged from the inside. Dorsal half shows the disposition of the ventricular trabeculae (phalloidin staining, confocal microscopy). Scale bar=100 µm. Star indicates the first activated ventricular region (crest of forming ventricular septum), arrows the direction of spread of activation along the radially aligned trabeculae. RA indicates right atrium; LA, left atrium; RV, right ventricle; and LV, left ventricle. f, Activation sequence showing right-to-left atrial activation (top row) followed by ventricular activation (bottom row). Frame spacing is 2 ms.



View larger version (92K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Sequence of functional deployment of the conduction fascicles. a, At HH 29, activation of the ventricle occurs in some cases from 2 centers—one basal and one at the site of the right ventricular apex, indicating partial maturation of the right bundle branch. b, At HH 34, mature apex-to-base ventricular activation pattern is present in about 50% of hearts, with a single breakthrough of the right bundle branch. c, At HH 35, double-breakthrough pattern indicating maturation of the left bundle branch was first observed. Contour spacing is 2 ms. See online movies for animation. d, Summary of incidence of observed ventricular activation patterns during chick embryonic development.

Timing of the Emergence of Apex-First Activation in the Embryonic Chick Ventricle Is Accelerated by Pressure Overload
The results described in the preceding section confirmed the initial description of conversion of the ventricular activation sequence in the embryo.18 Most significantly, optical mapping provided a direct and sensitive assay for this discrete marker of the development of HPS function. Previously, we had proposed that hemodynamics and/or mechanical conditioning may be key epigenetic factors in development of the HPS.6–8 We thus hypothesized that increased hemodynamic load may accelerate the timing of the conversion, marking maturation of the conduction system. CTB at HH 21 constricts the outflow tract of the embryonic heart, inducing a sustained increase in blood pressure within the ventricle.9 As conversion normally begins from around HH 29, we focused on stages HH 27 to 28. In line with our hypothesis, CTB resulted in precocious emergence of the mature apex-first pattern relative to controls (Pearson’s {chi}2 test, P<0.01). Specifically, at HH 27 to 28, 9 of 20 banded hearts demonstrated breakthrough at the apex, either as a single apical focus (2 of 20) or in the context of the intermediate phenotype, where two ventricular breakthroughs are observed (Figure 3 and online movies). By contrast, all 27 control hearts consistently showed the immature base-to-apex activation. This evidence of significantly (P<0.05) accelerated maturation of ventricular conduction system was also present at HH 29 to 30 (Figure 3).



View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Precocious conversion to apex-to-base ventricular activation pattern is observed in CTB hearts. a, In control heart viewed from the back at HH 27, a typical base-to-apex activation pattern is observed. b, Proportion of CTB hearts shows an apex-first activation pattern, normally not seen before HH 31. See online movies for animation. c, Unfiltered optical recordings showing clearly the activation of the ventricular apex (black trace) prior to the base (gray trace) in the CTB heart. Sites of recordings are indicated by black and gray squares in a and b. d, CTB-induced pressure overload accelerates maturation of the HPS, as evidenced by significantly (Pearson’s {chi}2 test) accelerated conversion toward more mature ventricular activation patterns.

The distinct plasticity in this marker of HPS function led us to search for morphological correlates. Immunohistochemistry of PSA-NCAM, a well-characterized morphological marker of the developing HPS at this stage,15,18 delineated both bundle branches and an incipient network of Purkinje fibers in control hearts. In CTB hearts, overall upregulation of PSA-NCAM compared with controls was first apparent at HH 29, and this relative increase persisted through to HH 35 (Figure 4). Birth-dating with tritiated thymidine delineated the His bundle and bundle branches in control and CTB hearts at HH 35. As can be observed in Figures 4e and 4f, and as reported previously,11,21 CTB hearts consistently demonstrated a ventricular septal defect (VSD). The His bundle was delineated at the crest of muscular septum posterior to the VSD (Figure 4). The bifurcation of the His bundle and bundle branches were also distinguishable, although not as clearly as in the controls. Importantly, the distribution of cells demonstrating withdrawal from proliferation immediately after CTB (ie, at HH 21) was more extensive in banded hearts compared with nonbanded controls.



View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Morphology of ventricular conduction system in control and CTB hearts at HH 35. In control heart, the left bundle branch (arrow) is sharply outlined by both thymidine prelabeling (a and c) and PSA-NCAM (b and d; pseudocolor display of staining intensity), which labels more the distal part and subendocardial Purkinje network. The banded heart (e through h) presents a VSD (*), the boundaries of bundles are less sharply defined, and there is a marked PSA-NCAM upregulation in the left ventricle (f). Scale bar=1 mm (a, b, e, and f). RA indicates right atrium; LA, left atrium; RV, right ventricle; and LV, left ventricle.

Decreased Loading of the Embryonic Ventricle Delays the Timing of Apex-First Activation
Because the pressure-overload experiments demonstrated acceleration in the timing of the conversion to mature ventricular activation, we devised experiments to test whether maturation of HPS function could be delayed by decreased loading. For this purpose, we chose a model of decreased left ventricular preload induced by ligation of the developing left atrium.11,12,22 This procedure redirects the blood flow within the developing ventricle, leading to a distinct left ventricular hypoplasia and accompanying decreases in myocyte sarcomeric organization from insufficient mechanical loading.23 Because complete conversion to mature apex-to-base activation occurs normally at HH 36, we focused our analysis of LAL effects at stages HH 34 and 36. At HH 34, we observed immature base-to-apex ventricular activation in all hearts demonstrating left heart hypoplasia in response to LAL compared with only 36% controls (P<0.05). At HH 36, two thirds of hearts with left ventricular hypoplasia presented immature base-to-apex activation (P<0.01), whereas all controls demonstrated the mature phenotype (Figure 5). Fully mature patterns of activation were not seen even in the minority of LAL hearts showing apex-to-base sequences at HH 36. In such cases, no LAL hearts showed left bundle branch breakthrough. Simultaneous breakthrough at the termini of the right and left bundle branches represents the culminating step in the progressive maturation of HPS function. Although not present in any LAL hearts, this most mature of patterns was evident in 56% of stage-matched controls. Despite the distinct physiological phenotype resulting from LAL, the morphology and immunohistochemistry of the conduction fascicles in such hearts did not reveal any remarkable differences in HPS patterning (Figure 6), although subtle changes due to the treatment could not excluded.



View larger version (123K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Decreased preload in LAL delays HPS maturation. In a majority of control hearts at HH 36, apex-to-base activation with two breakthrough foci (a) is observed. Abnormal persistence of immature base-to-apex activation pattern is shown in heart subjected to LAL and severe left ventricular (LV) hypoplasia (b). RV indicates right ventricle. c, LAL-induced left ventricular hypoplasia is accompanied by significantly (Pearson’s {chi}2 test) delayed maturation of the HPS.



View larger version (108K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Morphology of ventricular conduction system in left heart hypoplasia. Despite the extreme shrinkage and dorsal shift of the hypoplastic left ventricle (hematoxylin-eosin staining; a and b), PSA-NCAM staining (c through f) on sister sections shows that both left (LBB) and right (RBB) bundle branches are present in their expected location in the upper interventricular septum. Scale bar=1 mm (a and b). RV indicates right ventricle; LV, left ventricle; RBB, right bundle branch; and LBB, left bundle branch.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
This study demonstrates that the normal timing of maturation of the HPS, as revealed by conversion of ventricular activation sequence, depends on hemodynamic loading. Increased pressure loading induced by embryonic outflow tract constriction (CTB) led to a precocious emergence of mature apex-first activation pattern, whereas decreased left ventricular filling caused by LAL led to its significant delay. These findings point to hemodynamics as a key epigenetic factor in development of the cardiac conduction system.

Compared with classic microelectrode recordings,4,18 optical mapping offers superior spatial resolution, allowing better appreciation of epicardial activation patterns.24 The potential shortcoming of inability to see the actual activation wavefront in three dimensions can be overcome by imaging the endocardial surface of a partially dissected heart, as was successfully shown in the present work and previously in a study demonstrating slow impulse propagation through the right bundle branch of connexin40 null mice.25 To control motion artifacts, we used the actin filament disrupter cytochalasin D.26 This proved to be effective and significantly improved signal-to-noise ratio. Although no effects of its addition on action potential shape and duration were reported in mouse (reviewed in27), we found that in chick it caused slight prolongation of action potential compared with mechanical restraint.28 Detailed evaluation of action potential morphology was not performed, because of the contraction artifacts obscuring the repolarization phase, if no excitation-contraction uncoupler was used, and possible confusion caused by its use that was essential to obtain good activation maps, and the need to change objectives to accommodate the increasing heart size. However, the atrial action potential was shorter than that of the ventricle, with typical morphology already at the earliest stages examined (Figure 1), and little developmental difference was observed in shape and duration of ventricular action potential. Microelectrode recordings with proper calibration should be more suitable for resolving any regional or developmental differences in action potential morphology.

There were some indications in the literature that development of the ventricular conduction system might show differences between the chick and the mouse.18,24,29 However, the optical mapping and morphological studies in chick and mouse undertaken here and elsewhere suggest that such differences may merely reflect species variation in the timing of key topological events during cardiac morphogenesis rather than their sequence.8 When such considerations are taken into account, the sequence of events is remarkably similar. In both species, the initial activation sequence follows blood flow through the peristaltoid tubular heart (mouse, embryonic day [ED] 7.5 to 8.5; chick, HH 10 to 14). Concomitant with chamber differentiation and looping, conduction velocity increases in the ventricular region. However, the initial base-to-apex ventricular activation pathway is present in both species when comparable (dorsal) views of the heart are used (mouse, ED9.530; chick, HH 17 to 29 [Figures 1 and 3Upa]). The functional deployment of HPS is first evidenced in mouse at ED10.5 by an apical epicardial breakthrough at the termination of the forming right bundle branch.24 As we report here, a similar pattern of right-sided first breakthrough at the apex occurs in chick between HH 29 to 31 (Figure 2). Similarly, in both species, the evidence of left bundle branch function (appearance of a second apical breakthrough site) occurs later (mouse, ED11.5; chick, HH 35). Although the gestation periods are similar between chick and mouse (20 to 21 days), the main sequence of morphogenetic events is much more compressed in the murine, as is the functional maturation of the HPS. While the mouse takes a mere 2 days (ED8.5 to ED10.5) to go from immature peristaltoid to mature apex-first activation, this period stretches between ED2 to ED7 in the avian (HH 14 to 31). This species difference also underscores the usefulness of the chick embryo as an animal model for the types of experiment undertaken in the present study. Together, with the relative surgical inaccessibility of the mouse embryo, the compressed "morphogenetic window" in mouse would probably confound resolution of the effects of altered hemodynamic loading similar to what we report here for chick.

With the use of molecular tools such as transgenesis in mice, the last decade has seen a great expansion in knowledge of the genetic regulation of cardiac development. By contrast, the epigenetic determinants of heart development remain relatively understudied. Nonetheless, the morphogenetic effects of factors such as myocardial stress/strain and blood pressure and flow in the embryonic heart are beginning to attract increasing attention.7,31,32 Although the present study indicates that ventricular load has direct effects on HPS maturation, the transcriptional and molecular signaling processes that may be downstream of such biophysical prompts are uncharacterized. Responses of embryonic trabecular myocytes to alterations in strain resulting from CTB or LAL, respectively, may be one important factor. Increased (CTB) or decreased (LAL) mechanical loading may accelerate or retard conversion, directly through conditioning of trabecular muscle destined to become conducting fascicles (reviewed in5,6). Another consideration may be the role of paracrine interactions from other mechanosensitive tissues such as the endothelium in prompting myocardial differentiation (reviewed in7,8). It is now well recognized that cardiac, vascular, and endothelial tissues respond sensitively to variation in shear stress and pressure in terms of altered gene expression and cytokine secretion (reviewed in33). Incipient conduction cells present in the ventricular trabeculae of the looped, tubular heart demonstrate intimate contacts with endocardial cells.34 Similarly, progenitors of the most peripheral element of the conduction system in the chick, the periarterial Purkinje fiber, show tight patterns of association with coronary arteries and never differentiate around lower tension vessels such as capillaries and veins.35–37 Vascular and endocardial tissues in the embryonic heart are thus well positioned and primed to transduce mechanical stimuli to embryonic myocytes via paracrine intermediaries. In previous work, we have reported that a shear stress–sensitive cytokine prominently expressed by endothelial tissues, endothelin-1 (ET-1), induces embryonic chick myocytes to express some markers of Purkinje fiber differentiation.38,39 Interestingly, ET-1 secretion by endothelial cells is particularly increased by a combination of pulsatile shear stress and increased blood pressure,40,41 hemodynamic changes particularly pronounced in CTB hearts. Alterations in ET-1 secretion and/or expression of ET-1 signaling pathway components such as endothelin-converting enzyme-1 (ECE-1) in response to altered hemodynamic load thus represent interesting topics for future study.

Studies in mouse suggest that a second factor secreted by endothelial cells, neuregulin-1 (NG-1), also has key roles in both trabecula formation and differentiation of conduction cells.30,42,43 To date, there is no evidence that NG-1 expression or secretion is directly modulated by mechanical factors such as strain or fluid shear stress and pressure. Thus, it is difficult to envisage how NG-1 could be the primary mediator of the plasticity in activation conversion seen here in response to altered loading of the embryonic ventricle. It may be pertinent that it has been reported that ET-1 treatment increases NG-1 expression in cultured endothelial cells,44 suggesting the potential for crosstalk between these two pathways and a basis for an indirect mechanism upregulation of NG-1 by physical force. This being said, it should be emphasized that the specific signaling and/or transcriptional processes governing functional maturation of the HPS remain to be fully characterized.

The present study indicates that conversion to apex-first activation is a sensitive temporal marker of the initiation of mature HPS function. As such, this marker represents a powerful new tool for future studies of the molecular mechanisms regulating morphogenesis of the ventricular conduction system in vivo.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported by NIH grants HL50582 (R.P.T.), HL52813 (A.W.), HD39946 (R.G.G.), and RR16434, University Research Committee Start-Up Grant and March of Dimes Basil O’Connor award (D.S.). Dr Martin Biermann developed the Universal Mapping program used for analysis of optical mapping data, and conversion routines were written by Jiri Volejnik. We would like to thank Prof Robert H. Anderson for helpful advice on analogies with human ventricular conduction system in hypoplastic left heart syndrome and Michael Bigelow for assistance with preparation of whole-mount specimens for confocal microscopy.


*    Footnotes
 
Original received April 2, 2003; revision received May 19, 2003; accepted May 20, 2003.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Haissaguerre M, Shah DC, Jais P, Shoda M, Kautzner J, Arentz T, Kalushe D, Kadish A, Griffith M, Gaita F, Yamane T, Garrigue S, Hocini M, Clementy J. Role of Purkinje conducting system in triggering of idiopathic ventricular fibrillation. Lancet. 2002; 359: 677–678.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

2. Suma K. Sunao Tawara: a father of modern cardiology. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2001; 24: 88–96.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

3. Kamino K. Optical approaches to ontogeny of electrical activity and related functional organization during early heart development. Physiol Rev. 1991; 71: 53–91.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. de Jong F, Opthof T, Wilde AA, Janse MJ, Charles R, Lamers WH, Moorman AF. Persisting zones of slow impulse conduction in developing chicken hearts. Circ Res. 1992; 71: 240–250.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Thompson RP, Lindroth JR, Wong YM. Regional differences in DNA-synthetic activity in the preseptation myocardium of the chick. In: Clark EB, Takao A, eds. Developmental Cardiology: Morphogenesis and Function. Mount Kisco, NY: Futura Publishing; 1990: 219–234.

6. Thompson RP, Reckova M, DeAlmeida A, Bigelow M, Stanley CP, Spruill JB, Trusk T, Sedmera D. The oldest, toughest cells in the heart. In: Development of the Cardiac Conduction System. Chichester, UK: Wiley; 2003: 157–176.

7. Gourdie RG, Kubalak S, Mikawa T. Conducting the embryonic heart: orchestrating development of specialized cardiac tissues. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 1999; 9: 18–26.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

8. Gourdie RG, Harris BS, Bond J, Justus C, Hewett KW, O’Brien TX, Thompson RP, Sedmera D. Development of the cardiac pacemaking and conduction system. Birth Defects Res. 2003; 69C: 46–57.

9. Clark EB, Hu N, Frommelt P, Vandekieft GK, Dummett JL, Tomanek RJ. Effect of increased pressure on ventricular growth in stage 21 chick embryos. Am J Physiol. 1989; 257: H55–H61.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

10. Rychter Z, Rychterova V. Angio- and myoarchitecture of the heart wall under normal and experimentally changed morphogenesis. In: Pexieder T, ed. Perspectives in Cardiovascular Research. New York, NY: Raven Press; 1981: 431–452.

11. Sedmera D, Pexieder T, Rychterova V, Hu N, Clark EB. Remodeling of chick embryonic ventricular myoarchitecture under experimentally changed loading conditions. Anat Rec. 1999; 254: 238–252.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

12. Tobita K, Schroder EA, Tinney JP, Garrison JB, Keller BB. Regional passive ventricular stress-strain relations during development of altered loads in chick embryo. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2002; 282: H2386–H2396.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Hamburger V, Hamilton HL. A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo. J Morphol. 1951; 88: 49–92.[CrossRef]

14. Sedmera D, Reckova M, DeAlmeida A, Sedmerova M, Biermann M, Volejnik J, Sarre A, Raddatz E, McCarthy RA, Gourdie RG, Thompson RP. Functional and morphological evidence for a ventricular conduction system in the zebrafish and Xenopus heart. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2003; 284: H1152–H1160.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Chuck ET, Watanabe M. Differential expression of PSA-NCAM and HNK-1 epitopes in the developing cardiac conduction system of the chick. Dev Dyn. 1997; 209: 182–195.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

16. de Groot IJ, Sanders E, Visser SD, Lamers WH, de Jong F, Los JA, Moorman AF. Isomyosin expression in developing chicken atria: a marker for the development of conductive tissue? Anat Embryol. 1987; 176: 515–523.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

17. Sanders E, de Groot IJ, Geerts WJ, de Jong F, van Horssen AA, Los JA, Moorman AF. The local expression of adult chicken heart myosins during development, II: ventricular conducting tissue. Anat Embryol. 1986; 174: 187–193.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

18. Chuck ET, Freeman DM, Watanabe M, Rosenbaum DS. Changing activation sequence in the embryonic chick heart: implications for the development of the His-Purkinje system. Circ Res. 1997; 81: 470–476.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Sedmera D, Pexieder T, Hu N, Clark EB. Developmental changes in the myocardial architecture of the chick. Anat Rec. 1997; 248: 421–432.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

20. Sedmera D, Pexieder T, Hu N, Clark EB. A quantitative study of the ventricular myoarchitecture in the stage 21–29 chick embryo following decreased loading. Eur J Morphol. 1998; 36: 105–119.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

21. Clark EB, Hu N, Rosenquist GC. Effect of conotruncal constriction on aortic-mitral valve continuity in the stage 18, 21 and 24 chick embryo. Am J Cardiol. 1984; 53: 324–327.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

22. Rychter Z, Rychterova V, Lemez L. Formation of the heart loop and proliferation structure of its wall as a base for ventricular septation. Herz. 1979; 4: 86–90.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

23. Sedmera D, Hu N, Weiss KM, Keller BB, Denslow S, Thompson RP. Cellular changes in experimental left heart hypoplasia. Anat Rec. 2002; 267: 137–145.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

24. Rentschler S, Vaidya DM, Tamaddon H, Degenhardt K, Sassoon D, Morley GE, Jalife J, Fishman GI. Visualization and functional characterization of the developing murine cardiac conduction system. Development. 2001; 128: 1785–1792.[Abstract]

25. Tamaddon HS, Vaidya D, Simon AM, Paul DL, Jalife J, Morley GE. High-resolution optical mapping of the right bundle branch in connexin40 knockout mice reveals slow conduction in the specialized conduction system. Circ Res. 2000; 87: 929–936.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Biermann M, Rubart M, Moreno A, Wu J, Josiah-Durant A, Zipes DP. Differential effects of cytochalasin D and 2,3 butanedione monoxime on isometric twitch force and transmembrane action potential in isolated ventricular muscle: implications for optical measurements of cardiac repolarization. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1998; 9: 1348–1357.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

27. Jalife J, Morley GE, Tallini NY, Vaidya D. A fungal metabolite that eliminates motion artifacts. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1998; 9: 1358–1362.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

28. Raddatz E. Response of the embryonic heart to hypoxia and reoxygenation: an in vitro model. Exp Clin Cardiol. 1997; 2: 128–134.

29. Cheng G, Litchenberg WH, Cole GJ, Mikawa T, Thompson RP, Gourdie RG. Development of the cardiac conduction system involves recruitment within a multipotent cardiomyogenic lineage. Development. 1999; 126: 5041–5049.[Abstract]

30. Rentschler S, Zander J, Meyers K, France D, Levine R, Porter G, Rivkees SA, Morley GE, Fishman GI. Neuregulin-1 promotes formation of the murine cardiac conduction system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99: 10464–10469.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. Hove JR, Koster RW, Forouhar AS, Acevedo-Bolton G, Fraser SE, Gharib M. Intracardiac fluid forces are an essential epigenetic factor for embryonic cardiogenesis. Nature. 2003; 421: 172–177.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

32. Hogers B, DeRuiter MC, Baasten AM, Gittenberger-de Groot AC, Poelmann RE. Intracardiac blood flow patterns related to the yolk sac circulation of the chick embryo. Circ Res. 1995; 76: 871–877.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

33. Brutsaert DL. Cardiac endothelial-myocardial signaling: its role in cardiac growth, contractile performance, and rhythmicity. Physiol Rev. 2003; 83: 59–115.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

34. Sedmera D, Pexieder T, Vuillemin M, Thompson RP, Anderson RH. Developmental patterning of the myocardium. Anat Rec. 2000; 258: 319–337.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

35. Davies F. The conducting system of the bird’s heart. J Anat. 1929; LXIV: 129–146.

36. Gourdie RG, Green CR, Severs NJ, Anderson RH, Thompson RP. Evidence for a distinct gap-junctional phenotype in ventricular conduction tissues of the developing and mature avian heart. Circ Res. 1993; 72: 278–289.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

37. Gourdie RG, Mima T, Thompson RP, Mikawa T. Terminal diversification of the myocyte lineage generates Purkinje fibers of the cardiac conduction system. Development. 1995; 121: 1423–1431.[Abstract]

38. Gourdie RG, Wei Y, Kim D, Klatt SC, Mikawa T. Endothelin-induced conversion of embryonic heart muscle cells into impulse-conducting Purkinje fibers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998; 95: 6815–6818.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

39. Takebayashi-Suzuki K, Yanagisawa M, Gourdie RG, Kanzawa N, Mikawa T. In vivo induction of cardiac Purkinje fiber differentiation by coexpression of preproendothelin-1 and endothelin converting enzyme-1. Development. 2000; 127: 3523–3532.[Abstract]

40. Ziegler T, Bouzourene K, Harrison VJ, Brunner HR, Hayoz D. Influence of oscillatory and unidirectional flow environments on the expression of endothelin and nitric oxide synthase in cultured endothelial cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1998; 18: 686–692.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

41. Markos F, Hennessy BA, Fitzpatrick M, O’Sullivan J, Snow HM. The effect of tezosentan, a non-selective endothelin receptor antagonist, on shear stress-induced changes in arterial diameter of the anaesthetized dog. J Physiol. 2002; 544: 913–918.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

42. Meyer D, Birchmeier C. Multiple essential functions of neuregulin in development [published erratum appears in Nature. 1995;378:753]. Nature. 1995; 378: 386–390.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

43. Hertig CM, Kubalak SW, Wang Y, Chien KR. Synergistic roles of neuregulin-1 and insulin-like growth factor-I in activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway and cardiac chamber morphogenesis. J Biol Chem. 1999; 274: 37362–37369.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

44. Zhao YY, Sawyer DR, Baliga RR, Opel DJ, Han X, Marchionni MA, Kelly RA. Neuregulins promote survival and growth of cardiac myocytes: persistence of ErbB2 and ErbB4 expression in neonatal and adult ventricular myocytes. J Biol Chem. 1998; 273: 10261–10269.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Circ Arrhythm ElectrophysiolHome page
V. M. Christoffels and A. F.M. Moorman
Development of the Cardiac Conduction System: Why Are Some Regions of the Heart More Arrhythmogenic Than Others?
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol, April 1, 2009; 2(2): 195 - 207.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
J. T. Butcher, T. C. McQuinn, D. Sedmera, D. Turner, and R. R. Markwald
Transitions in Early Embryonic Atrioventricular Valvular Function Correspond With Changes in Cushion Biomechanics That Are Predictable by Tissue Composition
Circ. Res., May 25, 2007; 100(10): 1503 - 1511.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
A. Gurjarpadhye, K. W. Hewett, C. Justus, X. Wen, H. Stadt, M. L. Kirby, D. Sedmera, and R. G. Gourdie
Cardiac neural crest ablation inhibits compaction and electrical function of conduction system bundles
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 2007; 292(3): H1291 - H1300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
D. P. Kolditz, M. C.E.F. Wijffels, N. A. Blom, A. van der Laarse, R. R. Markwald, M. J. Schalij, and A. C. Gittenberger-de Groot
Persistence of Functional Atrioventricular Accessory Pathways in Postseptated Embryonic Avian Hearts: Implications for Morphogenesis and Functional Maturation of the Cardiac Conduction System
Circulation, January 2, 2007; 115(1): 17 - 26.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
P. P. Sengupta, J. Korinek, M. Belohlavek, J. Narula, M. A. Vannan, A. Jahangir, and B. K. Khandheria
Left Ventricular Structure and Function: Basic Science for Cardiac Imaging
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 21, 2006; 48(10): 1988 - 2001.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
K. Tobita, L. J. Liu, A. M. Janczewski, J. P. Tinney, J. M. Nonemaker, S. Augustine, D. B. Stolz, S. G. Shroff, and B. B. Keller
Engineered early embryonic cardiac tissue retains proliferative and contractile properties of developing embryonic myocardium
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, October 1, 2006; 291(4): H1829 - H1837.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
D. Sedmera, A. Wessels, T. C. Trusk, R. P. Thompson, K. W. Hewett, and R. G. Gourdie
Changes in activation sequence of embryonic chick atria correlate with developing myocardial architecture
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, October 1, 2006; 291(4): H1646 - H1652.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
B. Swynghedauw
Phenotypic plasticity of adult myocardium: molecular mechanisms
J. Exp. Biol., June 15, 2006; 209(12): 2320 - 2327.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
M. Schmelter, B. Ateghang, S. Helmig, M. Wartenberg, and H. Sauer
Embryonic stem cells utilize reactive oxygen species as transducers of mechanical strain-induced cardiovascular differentiation
FASEB J, June 1, 2006; 20(8): 1182 - 1184.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
P. P. Sengupta, B. K. Khandheria, J. Korinek, J. Wang, A. Jahangir, J. B. Seward, and M. Belohlavek
Apex-to-Base Dispersion in Regional Timing of Left Ventricular Shortening and Lengthening
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 3, 2006; 47(1): 163 - 172.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
D. Sedmera
Form follows function: developmental and physiological view on ventricular myocardial architecture
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 2005; 28(4): 526 - 528.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
F. Rothenberg, V. P. Nikolski, M. Watanabe, and I. R. Efimov
Electrophysiology and anatomy of embryonic rabbit hearts before and after septation
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2005; 288(1): H344 - H351.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
I. R. Efimov, V. P. Nikolski, and G. Salama
Optical Imaging of the Heart
Circ. Res., July 9, 2004; 95(1): 21 - 33.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
C. E. Hall, R. Hurtado, K. W. Hewett, M. Shulimovich, C. P. Poma, M. Reckova, C. Justus, D. J. Pennisi, K. Tobita, D. Sedmera, et al.
Hemodynamic-dependent patterning of endothelin converting enzyme 1 expression and differentiation of impulse-conducting Purkinje fibers in the embryonic heart
Development, February 1, 2004; 131(3): 581 - 592.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
93/1/77    most recent
01.RES.0000079488.91342.B7v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reckova, M.
Right arrow Articles by Sedmera, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reckova, M.
Right arrow Articles by Sedmera, D.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Related Collections
Right arrow Electrophysiology
Right arrow Animal models of human disease
Right arrow Arrythmias-basic studies
Right arrow Cardiac development