| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Integrative Physiology |
From the Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.
Correspondence to David Sedmera, Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, Medical University of South Carolina, 173 Ashley Ave, BSB 601, Charleston, SC 29425. E-mail sedmerad{at}musc.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: chick embryo His-Purkinje system heart development optical mapping
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The development of mature HPS function in the embryo demonstrates a conserved pattern that is linked to significant phases of cardiac morphogenesis. Initially, cardiac impulse propagates in a linear, isotropic sequence from the sinus venosus at the most caudal portion of the tubular heart, toward the cranially located outflow tract.3 The isotropy of activation speed changes through looping of the tubular heart, with faster conducting segments corresponding to the primitive atria and ventricle becoming apparent.4 While the speed of impulse propagation increases, the actual sequence of activation within the undivided ventricles still follows the craniocaudal direction of blood flow. In practice, this means that activation first descends from the AV junction along the wall down the primitive left ventricle toward the apex and then ascends along the early right ventricle toward the outflow tract, resulting in an apparent base-to-apex sequence of excitation spread. Near the completion of ventricular septation in the embryonic chick heart, a distinct shift in the topology of ventricular activation emerges. The immature base-to-apex sequence of left ventricular activation undergoes an apparent reversal, altering rapidly to an apex-to-base pattern. This shift marks the emergence of mature "apex-first" epicardial breakthrough near the termini of the right and left bundle branches of the HPS.
Previously, we hypothesized a role for biophysical factors in differentiation of specialized cardiac tissues; either from effects of physical conditioning5,6 or through hemodynamic-induced molecular signaling cascades.7,8 We decided to test these assumptions on previously characterized in vivo models in which hemodynamic loading of the ventricle was either increased or decreased.912 This analysis revealed that the timing of emergence of apex-first activation shows a striking dependence on hemodynamic load; conversion from the immature to the mature pattern of ventricular activation was accelerated by increased loading and delayed by decreased load. The results from this study confirm the key importance of biophysical forces in the differentiation of the HPS in vivo.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Conotruncal Banding (CTB) and Left Atrial Ligation (LAL)
The embryonic surgical procedures were performed essentially as described.11 For details, see the expanded Materials and Methods section in the data supplement, available online at http://www. circresaha.org. Since the surviving sham-operated embryos from both procedures appeared normal and did not differ from intact embryos in HH stage or other measured parameters, they were pooled together as controls. Typical phenotype of hearts exposed to CTB or LAL was evaluated macroscopically as described previously11; only hearts with clearly developed morphological phenotype were used for further analysis (n
6).
Optical Mapping
Optical mapping was performed essentially as described in detail previously.14 For details, see the expanded Materials and Methods section in the data supplement, available online at http://www.circresaha.org.
Immunohistochemistry
After the recordings, the isolated control or experimental hearts were photographed, fixed in Dents fixative (80% methanol/20% DMSO), processed into paraffin, and serially sectioned at 8 µm for immunohistochemical detection of early markers of ventricular conduction system (PSA-NCAM, clone 5A5, fresh ascites fluid, from Developmental Studies Hybridoma bank15 and
-myosin heavy chain, clone 169-1A6,16 shown to stain developing ventricular conduction system in the avian heart in a manner described by Sanders et al.17 Imaging was carried out on Leica TCS SP2 AOBS confocal microscope.
Cell Birth-Dating Study With Tritiated Thymidine
See the expanded Materials and Methods section in the data supplement, available online at http://www.circresaha.org.
Statistical Analysis
For statistical analysis of treatment effects, we used Pearsons
2 test. A value of P<0.05 was considered significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Timing of the Emergence of Apex-First Activation in the Embryonic Chick Ventricle Is Accelerated by Pressure Overload
The results described in the preceding section confirmed the initial description of conversion of the ventricular activation sequence in the embryo.18 Most significantly, optical mapping provided a direct and sensitive assay for this discrete marker of the development of HPS function. Previously, we had proposed that hemodynamics and/or mechanical conditioning may be key epigenetic factors in development of the HPS.68 We thus hypothesized that increased hemodynamic load may accelerate the timing of the conversion, marking maturation of the conduction system. CTB at HH 21 constricts the outflow tract of the embryonic heart, inducing a sustained increase in blood pressure within the ventricle.9 As conversion normally begins from around HH 29, we focused on stages HH 27 to 28. In line with our hypothesis, CTB resulted in precocious emergence of the mature apex-first pattern relative to controls (Pearsons
2 test, P<0.01). Specifically, at HH 27 to 28, 9 of 20 banded hearts demonstrated breakthrough at the apex, either as a single apical focus (2 of 20) or in the context of the intermediate phenotype, where two ventricular breakthroughs are observed (Figure 3 and online movies). By contrast, all 27 control hearts consistently showed the immature base-to-apex activation. This evidence of significantly (P<0.05) accelerated maturation of ventricular conduction system was also present at HH 29 to 30 (Figure 3).
|
The distinct plasticity in this marker of HPS function led us to search for morphological correlates. Immunohistochemistry of PSA-NCAM, a well-characterized morphological marker of the developing HPS at this stage,15,18 delineated both bundle branches and an incipient network of Purkinje fibers in control hearts. In CTB hearts, overall upregulation of PSA-NCAM compared with controls was first apparent at HH 29, and this relative increase persisted through to HH 35 (Figure 4). Birth-dating with tritiated thymidine delineated the His bundle and bundle branches in control and CTB hearts at HH 35. As can be observed in Figures 4e and 4f, and as reported previously,11,21 CTB hearts consistently demonstrated a ventricular septal defect (VSD). The His bundle was delineated at the crest of muscular septum posterior to the VSD (Figure 4). The bifurcation of the His bundle and bundle branches were also distinguishable, although not as clearly as in the controls. Importantly, the distribution of cells demonstrating withdrawal from proliferation immediately after CTB (ie, at HH 21) was more extensive in banded hearts compared with nonbanded controls.
|
Decreased Loading of the Embryonic Ventricle Delays the Timing of Apex-First Activation
Because the pressure-overload experiments demonstrated acceleration in the timing of the conversion to mature ventricular activation, we devised experiments to test whether maturation of HPS function could be delayed by decreased loading. For this purpose, we chose a model of decreased left ventricular preload induced by ligation of the developing left atrium.11,12,22 This procedure redirects the blood flow within the developing ventricle, leading to a distinct left ventricular hypoplasia and accompanying decreases in myocyte sarcomeric organization from insufficient mechanical loading.23 Because complete conversion to mature apex-to-base activation occurs normally at HH 36, we focused our analysis of LAL effects at stages HH 34 and 36. At HH 34, we observed immature base-to-apex ventricular activation in all hearts demonstrating left heart hypoplasia in response to LAL compared with only 36% controls (P<0.05). At HH 36, two thirds of hearts with left ventricular hypoplasia presented immature base-to-apex activation (P<0.01), whereas all controls demonstrated the mature phenotype (Figure 5). Fully mature patterns of activation were not seen even in the minority of LAL hearts showing apex-to-base sequences at HH 36. In such cases, no LAL hearts showed left bundle branch breakthrough. Simultaneous breakthrough at the termini of the right and left bundle branches represents the culminating step in the progressive maturation of HPS function. Although not present in any LAL hearts, this most mature of patterns was evident in 56% of stage-matched controls. Despite the distinct physiological phenotype resulting from LAL, the morphology and immunohistochemistry of the conduction fascicles in such hearts did not reveal any remarkable differences in HPS patterning (Figure 6), although subtle changes due to the treatment could not excluded.
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Compared with classic microelectrode recordings,4,18 optical mapping offers superior spatial resolution, allowing better appreciation of epicardial activation patterns.24 The potential shortcoming of inability to see the actual activation wavefront in three dimensions can be overcome by imaging the endocardial surface of a partially dissected heart, as was successfully shown in the present work and previously in a study demonstrating slow impulse propagation through the right bundle branch of connexin40 null mice.25 To control motion artifacts, we used the actin filament disrupter cytochalasin D.26 This proved to be effective and significantly improved signal-to-noise ratio. Although no effects of its addition on action potential shape and duration were reported in mouse (reviewed in27), we found that in chick it caused slight prolongation of action potential compared with mechanical restraint.28 Detailed evaluation of action potential morphology was not performed, because of the contraction artifacts obscuring the repolarization phase, if no excitation-contraction uncoupler was used, and possible confusion caused by its use that was essential to obtain good activation maps, and the need to change objectives to accommodate the increasing heart size. However, the atrial action potential was shorter than that of the ventricle, with typical morphology already at the earliest stages examined (Figure 1), and little developmental difference was observed in shape and duration of ventricular action potential. Microelectrode recordings with proper calibration should be more suitable for resolving any regional or developmental differences in action potential morphology.
There were some indications in the literature that development of the ventricular conduction system might show differences between the chick and the mouse.18,24,29 However, the optical mapping and morphological studies in chick and mouse undertaken here and elsewhere suggest that such differences may merely reflect species variation in the timing of key topological events during cardiac morphogenesis rather than their sequence.8 When such considerations are taken into account, the sequence of events is remarkably similar. In both species, the initial activation sequence follows blood flow through the peristaltoid tubular heart (mouse, embryonic day [ED] 7.5 to 8.5; chick, HH 10 to 14). Concomitant with chamber differentiation and looping, conduction velocity increases in the ventricular region. However, the initial base-to-apex ventricular activation pathway is present in both species when comparable (dorsal) views of the heart are used (mouse, ED9.530; chick, HH 17 to 29 [Figures 1 and 3
a]). The functional deployment of HPS is first evidenced in mouse at ED10.5 by an apical epicardial breakthrough at the termination of the forming right bundle branch.24 As we report here, a similar pattern of right-sided first breakthrough at the apex occurs in chick between HH 29 to 31 (Figure 2). Similarly, in both species, the evidence of left bundle branch function (appearance of a second apical breakthrough site) occurs later (mouse, ED11.5; chick, HH 35). Although the gestation periods are similar between chick and mouse (20 to 21 days), the main sequence of morphogenetic events is much more compressed in the murine, as is the functional maturation of the HPS. While the mouse takes a mere 2 days (ED8.5 to ED10.5) to go from immature peristaltoid to mature apex-first activation, this period stretches between ED2 to ED7 in the avian (HH 14 to 31). This species difference also underscores the usefulness of the chick embryo as an animal model for the types of experiment undertaken in the present study. Together, with the relative surgical inaccessibility of the mouse embryo, the compressed "morphogenetic window" in mouse would probably confound resolution of the effects of altered hemodynamic loading similar to what we report here for chick.
With the use of molecular tools such as transgenesis in mice, the last decade has seen a great expansion in knowledge of the genetic regulation of cardiac development. By contrast, the epigenetic determinants of heart development remain relatively understudied. Nonetheless, the morphogenetic effects of factors such as myocardial stress/strain and blood pressure and flow in the embryonic heart are beginning to attract increasing attention.7,31,32 Although the present study indicates that ventricular load has direct effects on HPS maturation, the transcriptional and molecular signaling processes that may be downstream of such biophysical prompts are uncharacterized. Responses of embryonic trabecular myocytes to alterations in strain resulting from CTB or LAL, respectively, may be one important factor. Increased (CTB) or decreased (LAL) mechanical loading may accelerate or retard conversion, directly through conditioning of trabecular muscle destined to become conducting fascicles (reviewed in5,6). Another consideration may be the role of paracrine interactions from other mechanosensitive tissues such as the endothelium in prompting myocardial differentiation (reviewed in7,8). It is now well recognized that cardiac, vascular, and endothelial tissues respond sensitively to variation in shear stress and pressure in terms of altered gene expression and cytokine secretion (reviewed in33). Incipient conduction cells present in the ventricular trabeculae of the looped, tubular heart demonstrate intimate contacts with endocardial cells.34 Similarly, progenitors of the most peripheral element of the conduction system in the chick, the periarterial Purkinje fiber, show tight patterns of association with coronary arteries and never differentiate around lower tension vessels such as capillaries and veins.3537 Vascular and endocardial tissues in the embryonic heart are thus well positioned and primed to transduce mechanical stimuli to embryonic myocytes via paracrine intermediaries. In previous work, we have reported that a shear stresssensitive cytokine prominently expressed by endothelial tissues, endothelin-1 (ET-1), induces embryonic chick myocytes to express some markers of Purkinje fiber differentiation.38,39 Interestingly, ET-1 secretion by endothelial cells is particularly increased by a combination of pulsatile shear stress and increased blood pressure,40,41 hemodynamic changes particularly pronounced in CTB hearts. Alterations in ET-1 secretion and/or expression of ET-1 signaling pathway components such as endothelin-converting enzyme-1 (ECE-1) in response to altered hemodynamic load thus represent interesting topics for future study.
Studies in mouse suggest that a second factor secreted by endothelial cells, neuregulin-1 (NG-1), also has key roles in both trabecula formation and differentiation of conduction cells.30,42,43 To date, there is no evidence that NG-1 expression or secretion is directly modulated by mechanical factors such as strain or fluid shear stress and pressure. Thus, it is difficult to envisage how NG-1 could be the primary mediator of the plasticity in activation conversion seen here in response to altered loading of the embryonic ventricle. It may be pertinent that it has been reported that ET-1 treatment increases NG-1 expression in cultured endothelial cells,44 suggesting the potential for crosstalk between these two pathways and a basis for an indirect mechanism upregulation of NG-1 by physical force. This being said, it should be emphasized that the specific signaling and/or transcriptional processes governing functional maturation of the HPS remain to be fully characterized.
The present study indicates that conversion to apex-first activation is a sensitive temporal marker of the initiation of mature HPS function. As such, this marker represents a powerful new tool for future studies of the molecular mechanisms regulating morphogenesis of the ventricular conduction system in vivo.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Suma K. Sunao Tawara: a father of modern cardiology. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2001; 24: 8896.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Kamino K. Optical approaches to ontogeny of electrical activity and related functional organization during early heart development. Physiol Rev. 1991; 71: 5391.
4. de Jong F, Opthof T, Wilde AA, Janse MJ, Charles R, Lamers WH, Moorman AF. Persisting zones of slow impulse conduction in developing chicken hearts. Circ Res. 1992; 71: 240250.
5. Thompson RP, Lindroth JR, Wong YM. Regional differences in DNA-synthetic activity in the preseptation myocardium of the chick. In: Clark EB, Takao A, eds. Developmental Cardiology: Morphogenesis and Function. Mount Kisco, NY: Futura Publishing; 1990: 219234.
6. Thompson RP, Reckova M, DeAlmeida A, Bigelow M, Stanley CP, Spruill JB, Trusk T, Sedmera D. The oldest, toughest cells in the heart. In: Development of the Cardiac Conduction System. Chichester, UK: Wiley; 2003: 157176.
7. Gourdie RG, Kubalak S, Mikawa T. Conducting the embryonic heart: orchestrating development of specialized cardiac tissues. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 1999; 9: 1826.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Gourdie RG, Harris BS, Bond J, Justus C, Hewett KW, OBrien TX, Thompson RP, Sedmera D. Development of the cardiac pacemaking and conduction system. Birth Defects Res. 2003; 69C: 4657.
9. Clark EB, Hu N, Frommelt P, Vandekieft GK, Dummett JL, Tomanek RJ. Effect of increased pressure on ventricular growth in stage 21 chick embryos. Am J Physiol. 1989; 257: H55H61.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Rychter Z, Rychterova V. Angio- and myoarchitecture of the heart wall under normal and experimentally changed morphogenesis. In: Pexieder T, ed. Perspectives in Cardiovascular Research. New York, NY: Raven Press; 1981: 431452.
11. Sedmera D, Pexieder T, Rychterova V, Hu N, Clark EB. Remodeling of chick embryonic ventricular myoarchitecture under experimentally changed loading conditions. Anat Rec. 1999; 254: 238252.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Tobita K, Schroder EA, Tinney JP, Garrison JB, Keller BB. Regional passive ventricular stress-strain relations during development of altered loads in chick embryo. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2002; 282: H2386H2396.
13. Hamburger V, Hamilton HL. A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo. J Morphol. 1951; 88: 4992.[CrossRef]
14. Sedmera D, Reckova M, DeAlmeida A, Sedmerova M, Biermann M, Volejnik J, Sarre A, Raddatz E, McCarthy RA, Gourdie RG, Thompson RP. Functional and morphological evidence for a ventricular conduction system in the zebrafish and Xenopus heart. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2003; 284: H1152H1160.
15. Chuck ET, Watanabe M. Differential expression of PSA-NCAM and HNK-1 epitopes in the developing cardiac conduction system of the chick. Dev Dyn. 1997; 209: 182195.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. de Groot IJ, Sanders E, Visser SD, Lamers WH, de Jong F, Los JA, Moorman AF. Isomyosin expression in developing chicken atria: a marker for the development of conductive tissue? Anat Embryol. 1987; 176: 515523.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Sanders E, de Groot IJ, Geerts WJ, de Jong F, van Horssen AA, Los JA, Moorman AF. The local expression of adult chicken heart myosins during development, II: ventricular conducting tissue. Anat Embryol. 1986; 174: 187193.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Chuck ET, Freeman DM, Watanabe M, Rosenbaum DS. Changing activation sequence in the embryonic chick heart: implications for the development of the His-Purkinje system. Circ Res. 1997; 81: 470476.
19. Sedmera D, Pexieder T, Hu N, Clark EB. Developmental changes in the myocardial architecture of the chick. Anat Rec. 1997; 248: 421432.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Sedmera D, Pexieder T, Hu N, Clark EB. A quantitative study of the ventricular myoarchitecture in the stage 2129 chick embryo following decreased loading. Eur J Morphol. 1998; 36: 105119.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Clark EB, Hu N, Rosenquist GC. Effect of conotruncal constriction on aortic-mitral valve continuity in the stage 18, 21 and 24 chick embryo. Am J Cardiol. 1984; 53: 324327.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Rychter Z, Rychterova V, Lemez L. Formation of the heart loop and proliferation structure of its wall as a base for ventricular septation. Herz. 1979; 4: 8690.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Sedmera D, Hu N, Weiss KM, Keller BB, Denslow S, Thompson RP. Cellular changes in experimental left heart hypoplasia. Anat Rec. 2002; 267: 137145.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Rentschler S, Vaidya DM, Tamaddon H, Degenhardt K, Sassoon D, Morley GE, Jalife J, Fishman GI. Visualization and functional characterization of the developing murine cardiac conduction system. Development. 2001; 128: 17851792.[Abstract]
25. Tamaddon HS, Vaidya D, Simon AM, Paul DL, Jalife J, Morley GE. High-resolution optical mapping of the right bundle branch in connexin40 knockout mice reveals slow conduction in the specialized conduction system. Circ Res. 2000; 87: 929936.
26. Biermann M, Rubart M, Moreno A, Wu J, Josiah-Durant A, Zipes DP. Differential effects of cytochalasin D and 2,3 butanedione monoxime on isometric twitch force and transmembrane action potential in isolated ventricular muscle: implications for optical measurements of cardiac repolarization. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1998; 9: 13481357.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Jalife J, Morley GE, Tallini NY, Vaidya D. A fungal metabolite that eliminates motion artifacts. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1998; 9: 13581362.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Raddatz E. Response of the embryonic heart to hypoxia and reoxygenation: an in vitro model. Exp Clin Cardiol. 1997; 2: 128134.
29. Cheng G, Litchenberg WH, Cole GJ, Mikawa T, Thompson RP, Gourdie RG. Development of the cardiac conduction system involves recruitment within a multipotent cardiomyogenic lineage. Development. 1999; 126: 50415049.[Abstract]
30. Rentschler S, Zander J, Meyers K, France D, Levine R, Porter G, Rivkees SA, Morley GE, Fishman GI. Neuregulin-1 promotes formation of the murine cardiac conduction system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99: 1046410469.
31. Hove JR, Koster RW, Forouhar AS, Acevedo-Bolton G, Fraser SE, Gharib M. Intracardiac fluid forces are an essential epigenetic factor for embryonic cardiogenesis. Nature. 2003; 421: 172177.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Hogers B, DeRuiter MC, Baasten AM, Gittenberger-de Groot AC, Poelmann RE. Intracardiac blood flow patterns related to the yolk sac circulation of the chick embryo. Circ Res. 1995; 76: 871877.
33. Brutsaert DL. Cardiac endothelial-myocardial signaling: its role in cardiac growth, contractile performance, and rhythmicity. Physiol Rev. 2003; 83: 59115.
34. Sedmera D, Pexieder T, Vuillemin M, Thompson RP, Anderson RH. Developmental patterning of the myocardium. Anat Rec. 2000; 258: 319337.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Davies F. The conducting system of the birds heart. J Anat. 1929; LXIV: 129146.
36. Gourdie RG, Green CR, Severs NJ, Anderson RH, Thompson RP. Evidence for a distinct gap-junctional phenotype in ventricular conduction tissues of the developing and mature avian heart. Circ Res. 1993; 72: 278289.
37. Gourdie RG, Mima T, Thompson RP, Mikawa T. Terminal diversification of the myocyte lineage generates Purkinje fibers of the cardiac conduction system. Development. 1995; 121: 14231431.[Abstract]
38. Gourdie RG, Wei Y, Kim D, Klatt SC, Mikawa T. Endothelin-induced conversion of embryonic heart muscle cells into impulse-conducting Purkinje fibers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998; 95: 68156818.
39. Takebayashi-Suzuki K, Yanagisawa M, Gourdie RG, Kanzawa N, Mikawa T. In vivo induction of cardiac Purkinje fiber differentiation by coexpression of preproendothelin-1 and endothelin converting enzyme-1. Development. 2000; 127: 35233532.[Abstract]
40. Ziegler T, Bouzourene K, Harrison VJ, Brunner HR, Hayoz D. Influence of oscillatory and unidirectional flow environments on the expression of endothelin and nitric oxide synthase in cultured endothelial cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1998; 18: 686692.
41. Markos F, Hennessy BA, Fitzpatrick M, OSullivan J, Snow HM. The effect of tezosentan, a non-selective endothelin receptor antagonist, on shear stress-induced changes in arterial diameter of the anaesthetized dog. J Physiol. 2002; 544: 913918.
42. Meyer D, Birchmeier C. Multiple essential functions of neuregulin in development [published erratum appears in Nature. 1995;378:753]. Nature. 1995; 378: 386390.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
43. Hertig CM, Kubalak SW, Wang Y, Chien KR. Synergistic roles of neuregulin-1 and insulin-like growth factor-I in activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway and cardiac chamber morphogenesis. J Biol Chem. 1999; 274: 3736237369.
44. Zhao YY, Sawyer DR, Baliga RR, Opel DJ, Han X, Marchionni MA, Kelly RA. Neuregulins promote survival and growth of cardiac myocytes: persistence of ErbB2 and ErbB4 expression in neonatal and adult ventricular myocytes. J Biol Chem. 1998; 273: 1026110269.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
V. M. Christoffels and A. F.M. Moorman Development of the Cardiac Conduction System: Why Are Some Regions of the Heart More Arrhythmogenic Than Others? Circ Arrhythmia Electrophysiol, April 1, 2009; 2(2): 195 - 207. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. T. Butcher, T. C. McQuinn, D. Sedmera, D. Turner, and R. R. Markwald Transitions in Early Embryonic Atrioventricular Valvular Function Correspond With Changes in Cushion Biomechanics That Are Predictable by Tissue Composition Circ. Res., May 25, 2007; 100(10): 1503 - 1511. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Gurjarpadhye, K. W. Hewett, C. Justus, X. Wen, H. Stadt, M. L. Kirby, D. Sedmera, and R. G. Gourdie Cardiac neural crest ablation inhibits compaction and electrical function of conduction system bundles Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 2007; 292(3): H1291 - H1300. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. P. Kolditz, M. C.E.F. Wijffels, N. A. Blom, A. van der Laarse, R. R. Markwald, M. J. Schalij, and A. C. Gittenberger-de Groot Persistence of Functional Atrioventricular Accessory Pathways in Postseptated Embryonic Avian Hearts: Implications for Morphogenesis and Functional Maturation of the Cardiac Conduction System Circulation, January 2, 2007; 115(1): 17 - 26. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. P. Sengupta, J. Korinek, M. Belohlavek, J. Narula, M. A. Vannan, A. Jahangir, and B. K. Khandheria Left Ventricular Structure and Function: Basic Science for Cardiac Imaging J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 21, 2006; 48(10): 1988 - 2001. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Tobita, L. J. Liu, A. M. Janczewski, J. P. Tinney, J. M. Nonemaker, S. Augustine, D. B. Stolz, S. G. Shroff, and B. B. Keller Engineered early embryonic cardiac tissue retains proliferative and contractile properties of developing embryonic myocardium Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, October 1, 2006; 291(4): H1829 - H1837. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Sedmera, A. Wessels, T. C. Trusk, R. P. Thompson, K. W. Hewett, and R. G. Gourdie Changes in activation sequence of embryonic chick atria correlate with developing myocardial architecture Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, October 1, 2006; 291(4): H1646 - H1652. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Swynghedauw Phenotypic plasticity of adult myocardium: molecular mechanisms J. Exp. Biol., June 15, 2006; 209(12): 2320 - 2327. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Schmelter, B. Ateghang, S. Helmig, M. Wartenberg, and H. Sauer Embryonic stem cells utilize reactive oxygen species as transducers of mechanical strain-induced cardiovascular differentiation FASEB J, June 1, 2006; 20(8): 1182 - 1184. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. P. Sengupta, B. K. Khandheria, J. Korinek, J. Wang, A. Jahangir, J. B. Seward, and M. Belohlavek Apex-to-Base Dispersion in Regional Timing of Left Ventricular Shortening and Lengthening J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 3, 2006; 47(1): 163 - 172. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Sedmera Form follows function: developmental and physiological view on ventricular myocardial architecture Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 2005; 28(4): 526 - 528. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Rothenberg, V. P. Nikolski, M. Watanabe, and I. R. Efimov Electrophysiology and anatomy of embryonic rabbit hearts before and after septation Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2005; 288(1): H344 - H351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. R. Efimov, V. P. Nikolski, and G. Salama Optical Imaging of the Heart Circ. Res., July 9, 2004; 95(1): 21 - 33. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. E. Hall, R. Hurtado, K. W. Hewett, M. Shulimovich, C. P. Poma, M. Reckova, C. Justus, D. J. Pennisi, K. Tobita, D. Sedmera, et al. Hemodynamic-dependent patterning of endothelin converting enzyme 1 expression and differentiation of impulse-conducting Purkinje fibers in the embryonic heart Development, February 1, 2004; 131(3): 581 - 592. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Research Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2003 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |