This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 92/5/532    most recent 01.RES.0000064175.70693.ECv1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Inoue, M. Articles by Bridge, J. H.B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Inoue, M. Articles by Bridge, J. H.B. Pubmed/NCBI databases Compound via MeSH Substance via MeSH Hazardous Substances DB BARIUM COMPOUNDS BARIUM, ELEMENTAL CALCIUM COMPOUNDS CALCIUM, ELEMENTAL Related Collections Contractile function Other myocardial biology Quantitative modeling

(Circulation Research. 2003;92:532.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.

Cellular Biology

Ca²⁺ Sparks in Rabbit Ventricular Myocytes Evoked by Action Potentials

Involvement of Clusters of L-Type Ca²⁺ Channels

Masashi Inoue, John H.B. Bridge

From the Nora Eccles Harrison Cardiovascular Research and Training Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.

Correspondence to Masashi Inoue, CVRTI, University of Utah, 95 South 2000 East Back, Salt Lake City, UT 84112-5000. E-mail inoue{at}cvrti.utah.edu

	Abstract

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
It is not clear how many L-type Ca²⁺ channels (LCCs) are required to ensure that a Ca²⁺ spark is triggered during a normal mammalian action potential (AP). We investigated this in rabbit ventricular myocytes by examining both the properties of sparks evoked by APs and the activity of LCCs. We measured Ca²⁺ sparks evoked by repeated APs with pipettes containing 2 mmol/L EGTA and single LCC activity in cell-attached patches depolarized to +50 mV using pipettes containing 110 mmol/L Ba²⁺. With 2 mmol/L Ca²⁺ in the external solution, we observed sparks at the beginning of every evoked AP at numerous locations. Each spark was observed repeatedly at a fixed location and began during a limited interval after the AP peak. These sparks occurred with a probability of approximately unity. However, the chance that an LCC does not open during the interval when a spark is triggered is quite high (0.13). Therefore, because single channels open with a probability significantly lower than 1, more than one LCC must be available to ensure that sparks are triggered with a probability of approximately unity. We conclude that it is likely that a cluster of LCCs is involved in gating a cluster of ryanodine receptors at the beginning of an AP.

Key Words: Ca²⁺ channels • Ca²⁺ sparks • excitation-contraction coupling • Ca²⁺ triggers • trigger clusters

	Introduction

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Calcium sparks are local Ca²⁺ release events from the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) and are believed to be the elementary basis of the Ca²⁺ transient. Thus, summation of many of these sparks is thought to underlie the Ca²⁺ transient. Cheng et al¹ originally proposed that a spark represented the flux of Ca²⁺ through a single SR release channel or ryanodine receptor (RyR). This idea has been discarded in favor of the idea that a spark originates from a cluster of 10 to 40 RyRs,^2–6 although some anatomical results suggested that as many as 200 RyRs may form a cluster.⁷ Separation of clusters of RyRs offers a partial explanation for local control of excitation-contraction coupling.⁸

A question of central importance is how L-type Ca²⁺ currents trigger sparks. In particular, how many L-type Ca²⁺ channels (LCCs) are required to ensure a given probability of spark production? There does seem to be fairly broad agreement that a single LCC opening can trigger a spark.^9–14 These conclusions on triggering sparks are based on experimental conditions where the probability of sparks was intentionally reduced by using Ca²⁺ antagonists or low [Ca²⁺]_o or by applying negative potentials. Under these conditions, it might be reasonable to conclude that a single LCC can gate RyRs with low probability. Few studies, however, have been conducted with unblocked L-type Ca²⁺ current, ie, with more physiological [Ca²⁺]_o or in the absence of Ca²⁺ antagonists. Under these conditions, sparks may be expected to appear more frequently but must still be triggered by Ca²⁺ flux that enters through LCCs close to clusters of RyRs. In this study, we investigated the properties of sparks and the activity of LCCs in rabbit ventricular myocytes under the conditions where spark probability and L-type Ca²⁺ current was not reduced.

	Materials and Methods

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Animals
We used adult New Zealand White rabbits (2.0 to 3.0 kg; Charles River Labs, Wilmington, Mass) housed according to the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (National Institutes of Health), completely anesthetized with intravenous administration of sodium pentobarbital (50 mg/mL). Myocytes were isolated enzymatically.¹⁵

Confocal Imaging
We used fluo-3AM (Molecular Probes) and a BioRad MRC-1024 laser-scanning confocal microscope system.¹⁵ Myocytes were placed with their long axis within ±10 degrees along the longitudinal axis of the imaging window. All images were acquired in linescan mode with 0.15 µm and 2 ms per pixel resolution. As the confocal system could not perfectly synchronize images with the external trigger, we also imaged stimuli simultaneously to align line-scan images.

The whole-cell patch-clamp technique was applied to myocytes to stimulate and record APs. We recorded APs elicited with 0.2 nAx2 ms pulses at 0.33 Hz with an Axoclamp-2A microelectrode clamp. The bath solution contained (in mmol/L) NaCl 138, CaCl₂ 2, MgCl₂ 1, KCl 4.4, dextrose 11, and HEPES 24. The pH was adjusted to 7.4 with NaOH. Pipettes (2.0 to 2.5 M) were filled with a solution containing (in mmol/L) KCl 110, K₂ATP 5, MgCl₂ 5, EGTA 2, CaCl₂ 0.54, NaCl 10, and HEPES 20. The pH was adjusted to 7.1 with KOH. We used an internet-based calculating program MAXCHELATOR (available at http://www.stanford.edu/cpatton/maxc.html) to calculate free [Ca²⁺] in the pipette solution (90 nmol/L at room temperature). All experiments were performed at room temperature. Data were filtered at 1 kHz and acquired with a Digidata 1200 acquisition system and pClamp8 software.

We analyzed the fluorescence images with the public domain NIH Image program (available at http://rsb.info.nih.gov/nih-image/).

Unitary Current Recording
We recorded single LCC currents in cell-attached patches. Pipettes (2.5 to 4.0 M) coated with Sylgard 184 (Dow Corning) were filled with the pipette solution containing (in mmol/L) BaCl₂ 110, HEPES 10, and TEACl 5. The pH was adjusted to 7.4 with TEAOH. The resting potential was set to zero with high-K⁺ bath solution containing (in mmol/L) KCl 140, dextrose 11, EGTA 2, and HEPES 24. The pH was adjusted to 7.4 with KOH. Unitary currents were recorded with patches of >30 G seal resistance using an Axopatch 200A patch clamp. We applied voltage commands from a holding potential at -80 mV to -10, 0, +10, +20 +30, +40, and +50 mV for 20 ms repeatedly (1000 times) at 10 Hz unless otherwise noted. Data were filtered at 1 kHz and acquired at 10 kHz with a Digidata 1200 acquisition system and pClamp8 software. All the experiments were performed at room temperature.

We subtracted baseline current (uncompensated capacitance current) from each sweep before analysis. The variation of capacitance current within 2 ms after depolarization was so large that we did not calculate nor analyze this 2-ms period. To calculate current amplitudes and open probabilities, we used all-point histograms and Gaussian fitting methods.¹⁶ We detected the probabilities of null events by using a 50% threshold.¹⁶

	Results

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Ca²⁺ Sparks in Rabbit Ventricular Myocytes
Evoked sparks are usually measured with procedures that reduce the probability of evoking sparks, including application of Ca²⁺ antagonists^1,10 or low [Ca²⁺]_o.^2,9 However, without these procedures it is difficult to detect sparks because they are numerous and fused (Figure 1A, bottom). Others measured Ca²⁺ release events in rat myocytes by dialyzing them with EGTA-containing solution.¹⁷ These authors presented arguments that EGTA increases the chance of detecting sparks by preventing their diffusion and improving signal-to-noise values by reducing background fluorescence. Without EGTA in the pipette solution (Figure 1A, bottom), some local regions of high fluorescence intensity appeared at the beginning of the AP, but eventually formed a fused Ca²⁺ transient (Figure 1B). Myocytes contracted during this elevation of Ca²⁺. With 2 mmol/L EGTA in the pipette solution (Figure 1C, middle), there were several regions of high fluorescence intensity at the beginning of the AP. By self-ratioing this fluorescence image, we were able to resolve sparks (Figure 1C, bottom). These spark appearances are limited to the beginning of APs. They disappeared after 10-minute treatments with 1 µmol/L thapsigargin in the bath solution (data not shown), consistent with the idea that they are local release events through RyRs.

View larger version (49K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1. Ca2+ sparks in rabbit ventricular myocytes. A, An example of APs (top) and line-scan diagrams of Ca2+ fluorescence without EGTA and CaCl2 in the pipette solution (bottom). B, Averaged fluorescence of line-scan diagrams in A (bottom). Scale is normalized to resting fluorescence. C, An example of APs (top), line-scan diagrams of Ca2+ fluorescence (middle), and the self-ratioed (F/F0) image with 2 mmol/L EGTA in the pipette solution (bottom). Ratio of fluorescence to background intensity (F/F0) plotted versus time in the line-scan diagram. D, Averaged fluorescence of line-scan diagrams shown in C (middle) and profiles of self-ratioed (F/F0) image at locations a and b shown in panel C (bottom). Scales are normalized to resting fluorescence.

At a Fixed Location, Sparks Occur During Every AP
We investigated spark probability at fixed locations.² With repeated stimuli, we obtained 50 self-ratioed images within 40 ms after each stimulus (Figure 2A). All sparks occurred only at the beginning of the repeated APs. The amplitudes of sparks were variable among locations. This can be explained if the centers of all sparks in the entire image were not located in the same confocal plane. There were some areas (eg, between locations a and b in Figure 2A) where sparks were not detected, suggesting the absence of T-tubules or SR junctions in these areas. Sparks could be signal-averaged (Figure 2B) because they occurred at almost the same time during each AP. Some sparks were fused (region g) and could not be separated in the averaged image. However, their amplitude profiles exhibit clearly discernable peaks. The distances between adjacent peaks are 1.65 µm (mean, range 1.35 to 2.1 µm) and are similar to the distances between T-tubules (1.8 µm).¹⁸ Spark profiles at various locations (Figure 2C) shows sparks always appeared after every stimulus with only one exception (see figure legends), hence the probability of Ca²⁺ spark occurrence evoked by APs is, at locations where they appear, approximately unity in rabbits. At a given location, the peak amplitudes of these sparks are similar. We examined 9 additional myocytes (25 to 50 consecutive stimuli), and obtained a series of less resolved, less bright sparks in each image. Nevertheless, these sparks also appeared with probability of approximately unity and their properties were similar to those in the representative myocyte.

View larger version (65K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 2. Sparks produced by 50 sequential stimuli. A, Series of 50 APs (top) and tiled F/F0 images (bottom) acquired within 40 ms after each stimulus (0.33 Hz). Vertical axis indicates position. Some of the spark locations are indicated (a through f). These locations are chosen because the sparks are relatively separated and the peak F/F0 values are >1.5 repeatedly. Fused sparks are indicated in region g. Horizontal temporal axis indicates 50 40-ms images lined up by stimulus number. B, Average of F/F0 image from 50 sequential images and profiles of the average at various times after the stimuli. Sparks did not appear during the first 4 ms after the stimuli. C, Profiles at loca-tions a through f. F/F0 measurements within 40 ms after each stimulus are lined up by stimulus number. Open triangle indicates an artifact where a spontaneous spark occurred just before the stimulus. Baseline (F/F0) value for this measurement was >20% higher than those of the preceding 5 and after 5 subsequent measurements because of a single spontaneous Ca2+ spark. Solid triangle indicates an exceptional case of spark failure where a spark appeared later than 20 ms after the stimulus.

Properties of Sparks at a Fixed Site
We examined the properties of a single spark by averaging F/F₀ images at the same location (Figure 3, bottom). The spark size was 1.8 µm (FWHM; full width at half maximum) in diameter and was similar to those reported in other species, eg, 2.0 and 1.8 µm (FWHM) in rats and mice, respectively.¹⁹ The profile of the averaged spark center (Figure 3, middle) reveals some delay from stimulation to spark appearance. By examining all the 50 images, the activation (at 10% maximum) of the spark occurred within the limited interval (3 to 4 pixels or 6 to 8 ms) after the stimulation signal recorded simultaneously. There was less than 1 pixel (0 to 2 ms) of delay between applying a stimulus and scanning a stimulus signal at a given site. As the AP peak consistently occurred 4 ms after the stimulus signal (Figure 3, top), the latency from the AP peak to the activation of the spark was estimated to lie within a limited range from 2 to 6 ms.

View larger version (55K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 3. Signal-averaged spark. Averaged action potentials (top) and an averaged F/F0 image (bottom panel) of a single spark at location e in Figure 2 from 50 sequential stimuli. Profile of F/F0 values at the center of the spark is shown in the middle panel. Maximal rise in F/F0 [maximal d(F/F0)/dt] appeared at 7 ms after the peak of the action potentials. Peak F/F0 value of this spark was 1.87.

Unitary Ba²⁺ Currents
To investigate voltage-gated LCCs, we measured unitary Ba²⁺ currents through LCCs by voltage clamp. The advantage of using Ba²⁺ instead of Ca²⁺ has been discussed extensively.²⁰ Although many experiments on LCC behavior are conducted near 0 mV, we needed to investigate their behavior at more positive potentials such as +50 mV that correspond to the AP peak. Despite a poor signal-to-noise ratio at very positive potentials, we could analyze 3 sets of data from -10 to +50 mV. The current amplitudes at +10 and +50 mV are -0.93±0.03 and -0.21±0.03 pA (mean±SEM, n=3), respectively. The average channel conductance from -10 to +30 mV (we excluded +40 and +50 mV because the current-voltage relationship is not linear near its reversal potential²¹) was 23±1 pS (mean±SEM, n=3). Our value is consistent with other reports.²²

As the whole-cell current is the summation of many unitary currents, the ensemble averages are proportional to the whole-cell currents. Thus, they should reveal the voltage dependence of whole-cell currents through LCCs. At +10 mV, the current develops slowly and saturates after 20 ms (Figure 4A). At +50 mV, the current saturates within 5 ms (Figure 4B). The difference in time courses and amplitudes at different voltages reveals the voltage dependence of the current activation.²² We conducted these measurements at a relatively high clamp-pulse frequency (10 Hz). The channel always closed less than 10 ms after the voltage command, consequently there were more than 70 ms of rest at -80 mV before each clamp pulse. However, there still may have been frequency dependent effects on the activation of the LCCs. We applied voltage commands from -80 mV to +10 mV to the same myocyte with the same frequency (0.33 Hz) as in the spark experiments. There was no detectable difference in time course of the ensemble average currents between high-frequency protocol (20 ms, 10 Hz in Figure 4A) and low frequency protocol (200 ms, 0.3 Hz in Figure 4C). Thus, we conclude there was no frequency-dependent effect when we measured unitary currents with this high-frequency protocol. The ensemble averages of our unitary Ba²⁺ currents show very slow or no decay after their peak. Cavalié et al²³ showed slow decay in the ensemble average at 32° to 35°C. It is possible that lower temperature (22° to 24°C) in our experimental condition makes the decay even slower.

View larger version (21K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 4. Properties of unitary Ba2+ currents during the voltage commands. These observations were obtained from the same myocyte. Ensemble average of 1000 sweeps of the unitary current at each voltage command (A, +10 mV; B, +50 mV) is shown in each panel. First 2 ms were excluded (see Materials and Methods). Current scales are different at the two voltages because the current amplitudes are significantly different. C, Ensemble average of 1000 sweeps of the unitary current at the voltage command from -80 mV to +10 mV for the duration of 200 ms at 0.3 Hz is shown in two graphs again with different time scales. There was no detectable difference in time course of the ensemble average currents between the high-frequency protocol (A) and the low-frequency protocol (C).

Ca²⁺ Channel Activity Within 2 to 6 ms After the Beginning of Depolarization
Because the sparks were activated within 2 to 6 ms after the peak of each AP, we investigated the behavior of LCCs during this period. The open probability of LCCs becomes greater when the voltage becomes more positive.^22,24 However, there were some null sweeps not only at +10 mV (eg, sweeps No. 11 and 371 in Figure 5A) but also at +50 mV (eg, sweep No. 292 in Figure 5A). These were null for the entire duration of the sweeps except for the first 2 ms when we could not resolve nulls. If we limit the time window within 2 to 6 ms after depolarization, there were additional partially null sweeps (eg, sweeps No. 12, 151, and 389 in Figure 5A, and sweeps No. 102, 222, and 420 in Figure 5B).

View larger version (30K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 5. Unitary Ba2+ currents during the voltage commands. A and B, Examples of unitary Ba2+ currents evoked by voltage commands from the holding potential of -80 mV to +10 mV (A) and +50 mV (B) obtained from the same myocyte. Current scales are different at the two voltages because the current amplitudes are significantly different. First 2 ms were excluded (see Materials and Methods). Solid lines indicate the baselines; broken lines indicate the amplitudes of the unitary currents at respective voltage commands.

Next, we calculated average probabilities of opening (P_open) and the probabilities of null events (P_null) within 2 to 6 ms after depolarizations to respective potentials (Figure 6). P_open shows sigmoid voltage dependence and reaches its maximum 0.67 near +50 mV. P_null also shows inverse-sigmoid voltage dependence and reaches its minimum 0.13 near +50 mV. Others have reported these sigmoid and inverse-sigmoid relationships of P_open²⁵ and P_null²⁴ versus voltage. P_null at +50 mV (0.13) indicates that the chance that a single LCC opens at least once within 2 to 6 ms after depolarization to +50 mV is 0.87. This probability is much lower than the spark probability that is approximately unity.

View larger version (17K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 6. LCC activities within 2 to 6 ms after depolarization. Average probabilities of opening (Popen) (A) and the probabilities of null events (Pnull) (B) within 2 to 6 ms after depolarizations to various potentials. Solid circles with error bars indicate mean±SEM (n=3). Broken curve indicates a Boltzmann fit to the data points. A, Fitting equation is Popen=Pm/{1+exp[-(V-Vh)/Vs]}. Pm=0.677±0.022, Vh=17.1±1.0 mV, and Vs=6.3±0.8 mV (mean±SE). B, Fitting equation is Pnull=1-Pm/{1+exp[-(V-Vh)/Vs]}. Pm=0.867±0.026, Vh=9.5±1.1 mV, and Vs=6.5±0.9 mV (mean±SE).

	Discussion

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
We infer that in rabbits, more than one LCC is required to gate RyRs and hence trigger sparks at high probability. It is essential to understand that this does not mean that a single LCC cannot trigger a cluster of RyRs. The reason for our conclusion is straightforward. Sparks evoked by APs appear during a short interval at the beginning of the AP with a probability of approximately unity (with a very few spark failures). However, depolarization to +50 mV (approximate peak AP voltage) does not always produce single LCC openings (they fail to open with a probability 0.13). A large body of evidence suggests that sparks are triggered by Ca²⁺ entry through LCCs. Thus, to ensure 100% gating of one or more RyRs, more than one LCC must be available to produce this gating frequency. However, different members of a cluster of LCCs could be involved on successive occasions.

The relationship between LCC openings and spark appearance was recently investigated by recording unitary Ca²⁺ currents with single-channel loose patches and the Ca²⁺ sparks produced by these currents.¹⁴ However, we could not use this direct approach to study the relationship between sparks and Ca²⁺ triggers. Instead, we used a less direct approach in which we compared the null probability of LCCs and the probability of sparks from separate experiments. We adopted this approach for the following reasons. First, we investigated spark probability at positive potentials during APs. The unitary current amplitude at +50 mV is so small (-0.21 pA with 110 mmol/L Ba²⁺) that we could not expect to record it with a loose patch. Second, it is possible that the structure of SR junction is impaired even with loose patches. Third, the direct approach required the use of FPL64176 to prolong LCC openings. Use of such agonists to prolong LCC openings seems necessary to detect unitary LCC currents and their concomitant sparklets. Thus, the coupling fidelity between LCC openings and sparks from their results may be inflated. In the following discussion, we assume every LCC opening can trigger a spark. This may overestimate the coupling fidelity but does not alter our main inference. We also discuss the limitations of our LCC measurements and show that these limitations do not alter our conclusion.

How Many LCCs Are Involved in Triggering a Spark?
With the probability of sparks (P_spark), the null probability of a single LCC (P_null), and the number (N) of channels in a cluster to trigger RyRs, we can obtain the following relationships. If we assume that every channel opening can trigger a spark, the chance of obtaining a spark (P_spark) is equal to the chance of obtaining at least one opening from any of the channels, ie, 1-(P_null)^N. From our results P_null is 0.13. Thus, setting N=2 makes P_spark=1-(0.13)²=0.98. Because P_spark is higher than this, we require more than 2 LCCs to be involved in triggering.

We have used Ba²⁺ as a charge carrier and from data obtained with this ion, we have attempted to make inferences about the behavior of an LCC when Ca²⁺ is the charge carrier. If we suppose that the first opening of a Ca²⁺ channel is responsible for gating sparks,²⁶ inferences made with Ba²⁺ as a charge carrier could be valid. This is because we assume the first opening to depend only on voltage. Even though it is widely accepted that Ca²⁺ but not Ba²⁺ has the capacity to inactivate the channel when it passes through it,²⁷ there is no a priori reason to assume that Ca²⁺ will affect P_null because this inactivation effect of Ca²⁺ cannot be expected to affect the first opening unless it is accumulated from beat to beat. If this were the case, our main conclusion would be strengthened.

Although we assume that every channel opening can trigger a spark, this may not be the case. The unitary current amplitude was -0.21 pA at +50 mV with 110 mmol/L Ba²⁺ in pipettes. However, if we used 2 mmol/L Ca²⁺ in pipettes instead, the unitary current amplitude would be much smaller at +50 mV. By applying the Goldman-Hodgkin-Katz current equation²¹ with a known permeability ratio P_Ba/P_Ca,²⁸ we can calculate its amplitude at +50 mV with 2 mmol/L Ca²⁺ in pipettes to be only -9.5 fA. In our calculation, we assume that any short opening of LCC could trigger a spark.²⁹ However, Viatchenko-Karpinski et al³⁰ recently argued that very brief openings with such small current amplitudes might not trigger sparks at all. If this is true, the probability that an LCC does not gate any RyRs is greater than P_null and hence N must be 3 or more.

By recording through a 1-KHz filter, we missed single-channel events <0.18 ms in duration. Open time analysis¹⁶ at +50 mV revealed that missed open events were 5% of the total open events. This would reduce actual P_null to 0.11 but does not alter our conclusion of LCC clustering, particularly if these brief openings do not exhibit a high probability of triggering.³⁰

The clustering of LCCs is also supported by a number of studies. To produce a spark, approximately 10 to 40 RyRs are reported to be involved.^2,5,31–33 The ratio of RyRs to dihydropyridine receptors was reported to be 3.7 in rabbit ventricular myocytes.³⁴ If we assume RyRs and LCCs are mostly located at the SR junctions,³⁵ 3 to 11 LCCs seems to be involved in gating RyRs. With our P_null (0.13), the values of N from 3 to 11 produce values of P_spark very close to unity [eg, when N=3, P_spark=1-(0.13)³=0.997].

Zhou et al³⁶ suggested far greater than 1:1 coupling fidelity between LCCs and RyRs under normal conditions. Initially, at least one RyR should be activated to produce a spark so that their results suggest the involvement of multiple LCCs in spark triggering. Takagishi et al³⁷ and Harms et al³⁸ reported that LCCs exist in large clusters in rabbit ventricular myocytes and live HEK293 cells, respectively. Our inference of clustering is consistent with these anatomical observations.

To maintain SR content, we resorted to evoking sparks with APs in the presence of a Na⁺ gradient. Under these conditions, reverse-mode Na⁺-Ca²⁺ exchange may contribute to triggering SR release.³⁹ On the other hand, Sipido et al⁴⁰ have reported that reverse-mode Na⁺-Ca²⁺ exchange triggers SR Ca²⁺ release but with a significant delay. Moreover, Na⁺-Ca²⁺ exchange is not very active at room temperature. However, there is evidence that L-type Ca²⁺ current and reverse-mode Na⁺-Ca²⁺ exchange act synergistically.^30,41 Na⁺-Ca²⁺ exchange is regulated by intracellular Ca²⁺ at a high-affinity binding site.⁴² Ca²⁺ influx through the exchanger is increased by that through LCCs.^43,44 Therefore, when a brief opening of an LCC cannot produce sufficient accumulation of Ca²⁺ to trigger sparks specially at positive potentials (eg, APs), it is possible that Ca²⁺ entry through LCCs activates Ca²⁺ entry by Na⁺-Ca²⁺ exchanger and these trigger a spark in concert when neither of them can do so alone. However, Ca²⁺ influx through LCCs is still essential to trigger sparks. Thus, the possible involvement of Na⁺-Ca²⁺ exchanger in the triggering process does not alter our inference of LCC clustering.

Importance of LCC Clustering for Excitation-Contraction Coupling
Two aspects of RyR gating by clusters of LCC may be important in both normal and diseased hearts. In the normal hearts, these are gating RyRs at the beginning of APs and also gating RyRs with a probability of unity. The former will result in sparks occurring at the beginning of APs at numerous locations. This would favor homogenous myocyte contraction. The latter will result in sparks occurring with a probability of unity at those locations where they are activated. This would optimize trigger efficiency and account for our observations. In the failing heart, Ca²⁺ sparks were observed with temporal and spatial heterogeneities.⁴⁵ Sipido⁴⁶ suggested that LCC clustering may explain this. If the number of available LCCs in a cluster decreases in the failing heart, the chance that a cluster gates RyRs will decrease and this will result in greater temporal dispersion of sparks, and sparks will not be uniformly triggered at the beginning of APs. Hyperactive LCCs in failing hearts⁴⁷ may to some extent compensate for defective Ca²⁺ triggers, but cannot completely prevent trigger failure.

A potential difficulty with our finding is that sparks occur with a probability of approximately unity. If all SR release units are activated, local control will not be responsible for increasing release. On the other hand, we do not know whether all SR release units are activated. Our results clearly showed that there are some T-tubular locations where sparks are not detected. It is possible that the presence of EGTA limits the activation of RyRs. This issue requires further investigation.

Limitations
Our experiments are performed at room temperature. At 37°C, LCCs will be more active.^22,23 Even if these conditions reduce P_null, we still require LCC clustering to explain our results at room temperature. With the cell-attached patch-clamp technique, we recorded from LCCs on the surface membrane but not in the T-tubules. However, there is no priori reason to think that LCC activity on the surface membrane is different from that in T-tubules. The properties of rabbit sparks are similar to those observed in other species.^2,19 Our measurements of LCC activity are also similar to those reported with other species.²³ Studies that are consistent with LCC clustering^2,5,31–38 have been performed in a variety of species. Thus, it seems reasonable to suggest that LCC clustering is not limited to the rabbit.

	Acknowledgments

 
This work was supported by the Richard A. and Nora Eccles Harrison endowment and awards from the Nora Eccles Treadwell Foundation and NIH Research Grants HL62690 and HL52338. We thank Drs Michael F. Sheets and Eric A. Sobie, who originally read the manuscript and gave us valuable suggestions, and Dr Philip R. Ershler for much technical help.

Received November 11, 2002; revision received January 16, 2003; accepted February 14, 2003.

	References

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 

1. Cheng H, Lederer WJ, Cannell MB. Calcium sparks: elementary events underlying excitation-contraction coupling in heart muscle. Science. 1993; 262: 740–744.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2. Bridge JH, Ershler PR, Cannell MB. Properties of Ca²⁺ sparks evoked by action potentials in mouse ventricular myocytes. J Physiol. 1999; 518: 469–478.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Lipp P, Egger M, Niggli E. Spatial characteristics of sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca²⁺ release events triggered by L-type Ca²⁺ current and Na⁺ current in guinea-pig cardiac myocytes. J Physiol. 2002; 542: 383–393.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Lukyanenko V, Györke I, Subramanian S, Smirnov A, Wiesner TF, Györke S. Inhibition of Ca²⁺ sparks by ruthenium red in permeabilized rat ventricular myocytes. Biophys J. 2000; 79: 1273–1284.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Izu LT, Mauban JR, Balke CW, Wier WG. Large currents generate cardiac Ca²⁺ sparks. Biophys J. 2001; 80: 88–102.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Mejia-Alvarez R, Kettlun C, Rios E, Stern M, Fill M. Unitary Ca²⁺ current through cardiac ryanodine receptor channels under quasi-physiological ionic conditions. J Gen Physiol. 1999; 113: 177–186.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Franzini-Armstrong C, Protasi F, Ramesh V. Shape, size, and distribution of Ca²⁺ release units and couplons in skeletal and cardiac muscles. Biophys J. 1999; 77: 1528–1539.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Stern MD. Theory of excitation-contraction coupling in cardiac muscle. Biophys J. 1992; 63: 497–517.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Cannell MB, Cheng H, Lederer WJ. The control of calcium release in heart muscle. Science. 1995; 268: 1045–1049.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. López-López JR, Shacklock PS, Balke CW, Wier WG. Local calcium transients triggered by single L-type calcium channel currents in cardiac cells. Science. 1995; 268: 1042–1045.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Santana LF, Cheng H, Gómez AM, Cannell MB, Lederer WJ. Relation between the sarcolemmal Ca²⁺ current and Ca²⁺ sparks and local control theories for cardiac excitation-contraction coupling. Circ Res. 1996; 78: 166–171.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Cannell MB, Soeller C. Numerical analysis of ryanodine receptor activation by L-type channel activity in the cardiac muscle diad. Biophys J. 1997; 73: 112–122.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Collier ML, Thomas AP, Berlin JR. Relationship between L-type Ca²⁺ current and unitary sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca²⁺ release events in rat ventricular myocytes. J Physiol. 1999; 516: 117–128.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Wang SQ, Song LS, Lakatta EG, Cheng H. Ca²⁺ signalling between single L-type Ca²⁺ channels and ryanodine receptors in heart cells. Nature. 2001; 410: 592–596.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Cordeiro JM, Spitzer KW, Giles WR, Ershler PE, Cannell MB, Bridge JH. Location of the initiation site of calcium transients and sparks in rabbit heart Purkinje cells. J Physiol. 2001; 531: 301–314.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Colquhoun D, Sigworth FJ. Fitting and statistical analysis of single channel records. In: Sakmann B, Neher E, eds. Single Channel Recording. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Plenum Press; 1995: 483–587.
17. Song LS, Sham JS, Stern MD, Lakatta EG, Cheng H. Direct measurement of SR release flux by tracking ‘Ca²⁺ spikes’ in rat cardiac myocytes. J Physiol. 1998; 512: 677–691.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Soeller C, Cannell MB. Examination of the transverse tubular system in living cardiac rat myocytes by 2-photon microscopy and digital image-processing techniques. Circ Res. 1999; 84: 266–275.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Cheng H, Lederer MR, Xiao RP, Gómez AM, Zhou YY, Ziman B, Spurgeon H, Lakatta EG, Lederer WJ. Excitation-contraction coupling in heart: new insights from Ca²⁺ sparks. Cell Calcium. 1996; 20: 129–140.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. McDonald TF, Cavalié A, Trautwein W, Pelzer D. Voltage-dependent properties of macroscopic and elementary calcium channel currents in guinea pig ventricular myocytes. Pflugers Arch. 1986; 406: 437–448.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Hille B. Selective permeability: independence. In: Ionic Channels of Excitable Membranes. 2nd ed. Sunderland, Mass: Sinauer Associates, Inc; 1992: 337–361.
22. McDonald TF, Pelzer S, Trautwein W, Pelzer DJ. Regulation and modulation of calcium channels in cardiac, skeletal, and smooth muscle cells. Physiol Rev. 1994; 74: 365–507.[Free Full Text]
23. Cavalié A, Pelzer D, Trautwein W. Fast and slow gating behaviour of single calcium channels in cardiac cells: relation to activation and inactivation of calcium-channel current. Pflugers Arch. 1986; 406: 241–258.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Rose WC, Balke CW, Wier WG, Marban E. Macroscopic and unitary properties of physiological ion flux through L-type Ca²⁺ channels in guinea-pig heart cells. J Physiol. 1992; 456: 267–284.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Scamps F, Nilius B, Alvarez J, Vassort G. Modulation of L-type Ca channel activity by P2-purinergic agonist in cardiac cells. Pflugers Arch. 1993; 422: 465–471.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Isenberg G, Han S. Gradation of Ca²⁺-induced Ca²⁺ release by voltage-clamp pulse duration in potentiated guinea-pig ventricular myocytes. J Physiol. 1994; 480: 423–438.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Yue DT, Backx PH, Imredy JP. Calcium-sensitive inactivation in the gating of single calcium channels. Science. 1990; 250: 1735–1738.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Hess P, Lansman JB, Tsien RW. Calcium channel selectivity for divalent and monovalent cations: voltage and concentration dependence of single channel current in ventricular heart cells. J Gen Physiol. 1986; 88: 293–319.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Zahradníková A, Zahradník I, Györke I, Györke S. Rapid activation of the cardiac ryanodine receptor by submillisecond calcium stimuli. J Gen Physiol. 1999; 114: 787–798.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Viatchenko-Karpinski S, Györke S. Modulation of the Ca²⁺-induced Ca²⁺ release cascade by beta- adrenergic stimulation in rat ventricular myocytes. J Physiol. 2001; 533: 837–848.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Lipp P, Niggli E. Fundamental calcium release events revealed by two-photon excitation photolysis of caged calcium in Guinea-pig cardiac myocytes. J Physiol. 1998; 508: 801–809.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Lukyanenko V, Wiesner TF, Györke S. Termination of Ca²⁺ release during Ca²⁺ sparks in rat ventricular myocytes. J Physiol. 1998; 507: 667–677.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. Soeller C, Cannell MB. Estimation of the sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca²⁺ release flux underlying Ca²⁺ sparks. Biophys J. 2002; 82: 2396–2414.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Bers DM, Stiffel VM. Ratio of ryanodine to dihydropyridine receptors in cardiac and skeletal muscle and implications for E-C coupling. Am J Physiol. 1993; 264: C1587–C1593.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Scriven DR, Dan P, Moore ED. Distribution of proteins implicated in excitation-contraction coupling in rat ventricular myocytes. Biophys J. 2000; 79: 2682–2691.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36. Zhou YY, Song LS, Lakatta EG, Xiao RP, Cheng H. Constitutive ß2-adrenergic signalling enhances sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca²⁺ cycling to augment contraction in mouse heart. J Physiol. 1999; 521: 351–361.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
37. Takagishi Y, Yasui K, Severs NJ, Murata Y. Species-specific difference in distribution of voltage-gated L-type Ca²⁺ channels of cardiac myocytes. Am J Physiol. 2000; 279: C1963–C1969.
38. Harms GS, Cognet L, Lommerse PH, Blab GA, Kahr H, Gamsjager R, Spaink HP, Soldatov NM, Romanin C, Schmidt T. Single-molecule imaging of L-type Ca²⁺ channels in live cells. Biophys J. 2001; 81: 2639–2646.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39. Litwin S, Kohmoto O, Levi AJ, Spitzer KW, Bridge JH. Evidence that reverse Na-Ca exchange can trigger SR calcium release. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1996; 779: 451–463.[Abstract]
40. Sipido KR, Maes M, Van de Werf F. Low efficiency of Ca²⁺ entry through the Na⁺-Ca²⁺ exchanger as trigger for Ca²⁺ release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum: a comparison between L-type Ca²⁺ current and reverse-mode Na⁺-Ca²⁺ exchange. Circ Res. 1997; 81: 1034–1044.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
41. Litwin SE, Li J, Bridge JH. Na-Ca exchange and the trigger for sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca release: studies in adult rabbit ventricular myocytes. Biophys J. 1998; 75: 359–371.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
42. Fang Y, Condrescu M, Reeves JP. Regulation of Na⁺/Ca²⁺ exchange activity by cytosolic Ca²⁺ in transfected Chinese hamster ovary cells. Am J Physiol. 1998; 275: C50–C55.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
43. Haworth RA, Goknur AB, Hunter DR. Control of the Na-Ca exchanger in isolated heart cells, I: induction of Na-Na exchange in sodium-loaded cells by intracellular calcium. Circ Res. 1991; 69: 1506–1513.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
44. Cordeiro JM, Cannell MB, Bridge JH. Non-linear signal transduction and excitation-contraction coupling in ventricular myocytes. Circulation. 2001; 104: II-51.Abstract.
45. Litwin SE, Zhang D, Bridge JH. Dyssynchronous Ca²⁺ sparks in myocytes from infarcted hearts. Circ Res. 2000; 87: 1040–1047.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
46. Sipido KR. Local Ca²⁺ release in heart failure: timing is important. Circ Res. 2000; 87: 966–968.[Free Full Text]
47. Schroder F, Handrock R, Beuckelmann DJ, Hirt S, Hullin R, Priebe L, Schwinger RH, Weil J, Herzig S. Increased availability and open probability of single L-type calcium channels from failing compared with nonfailing human ventricle. Circulation. 1998; 98: 969–976.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. H. B. Bridge, N. S. Torres, and E. A. Sobie New insights into the structure and function of couplons J. Physiol., August 15, 2008; 586(16): 3735 - 3735. [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Polakova, A. Zahradnikova Jr, J. Pavelkova, I. Zahradnik, and A. Zahradnikova Local calcium release activation by DHPR calcium channel openings in rat cardiac myocytes J. Physiol., August 15, 2008; 586(16): 3839 - 3854. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. M. MacDonnell, G. Garcia-Rivas, J. A. Scherman, H. Kubo, X. Chen, H. Valdivia, and S. R. Houser Adrenergic Regulation of Cardiac Contractility Does Not Involve Phosphorylation of the Cardiac Ryanodine Receptor at Serine 2808 Circ. Res., April 25, 2008; 102(8): e65 - e72. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Chantawansri, N. Huynh, J. Yamanaka, A. Garfinkel, S. T. Lamp, M. Inoue, J. H. B. Bridge, and J. I. Goldhaber Effect of Metabolic Inhibition on Couplon Behavior in Rabbit Ventricular Myocytes Biophys. J., March 1, 2008; 94(5): 1656 - 1666. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Bito, F. R. Heinzel, L. Biesmans, G. Antoons, and K. R. Sipido Crosstalk between L-type Ca2+ channels and the sarcoplasmic reticulum: alterations during cardiac remodelling Cardiovasc Res, January 15, 2008; 77(2): 315 - 324. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Altamirano and D. M. Bers Voltage Dependence of Cardiac Excitation Contraction Coupling: Unitary Ca2+ Current Amplitude and Open Channel Probability Circ. Res., September 14, 2007; 101(6): 590 - 597. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. E. D. J. ter Keurs and P. A. Boyden Calcium and Arrhythmogenesis Physiol Rev, April 1, 2007; 87(2): 457 - 506. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Zahradnikova Jr, E. Polakova, I. Zahradnik, and A. Zahradnikova Kinetics of calcium spikes in rat cardiac myocytes J. Physiol., February 1, 2007; 578(3): 677 - 691. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. D. Bootman, D. R. Higazi, S. Coombes, and H. L. Roderick Calcium signalling during excitation-contraction coupling in mammalian atrial myocytes. J. Cell Sci., October 1, 2006; 119(Pt 19): 3915 - 3925. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Klauke, G. L. Smith, and J. Cooper Extracellular Recordings of Field Potentials from Single Cardiomyocytes Biophys. J., October 1, 2006; 91(7): 2543 - 2551. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. T. Izu, S. A. Means, J. N. Shadid, Y. Chen-Izu, and C. W. Balke Interplay of Ryanodine Receptor Distribution and Calcium Dynamics Biophys. J., July 1, 2006; 91(1): 95 - 112. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. H.B. Bridge, C. J. Davidson, and E. Savio-Galimberti A Novel Mechanism of Pacemaker Control That Depends on High Levels of cAMP and PKA-Dependent Phosphorylation: A Precisely Controlled Biological Clock Circ. Res., March 3, 2006; 98(4): 437 - 439. [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Brette, L. Salle, and C. H. Orchard Quantification of Calcium Entry at the T-Tubules and Surface Membrane in Rat Ventricular Myocytes Biophys. J., January 1, 2006; 90(1): 381 - 389. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Inoue and J. H. B. Bridge Variability in Couplon Size in Rabbit Ventricular Myocytes Biophys. J., November 1, 2005; 89(5): 3102 - 3110. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. J. Knot, I. Laher, E. A. Sobie, S. Guatimosim, L. Gomez-Viquez, H. Hartmann, L.-S. Song, W.J. Lederer, W. F. Graier, R. Malli, et al. Twenty Years of Calcium Imaging: Cell Physiology to Dye For Mol. Interv., April 1, 2005; 5(2): 112 - 127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]