Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation Research
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation Research. 2003;92:525-531
Published online before print February 6, 2003, doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000060484.11032.0B
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
92/5/525    most recent
01.RES.0000060484.11032.0Bv1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wada, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bader, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wada, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bader, D. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cell biology/structural biology
Right arrow Smooth muscle proliferation and differentiation
Right arrow Endothelium/vascular type/nitric oxide
(Circulation Research. 2003;92:525.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.


Cellular Biology

Epicardial/Mesothelial Cell Line Retains Vasculogenic Potential of Embryonic Epicardium

Aya M. Wada, Travis K. Smith, Megan E. Osler, David E. Reese, David M. Bader

From the Stahlman Cardiovascular Laboratories, Program for Developmental Biology, and the Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tenn.

Correspondence to David M. Bader, Stahlman Cardiovascular Laboratories, Program for Developmental Biology, and the Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232-6300. E-mail david.bader{at}mcmail.vanderbilt.edu


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Recent work has demonstrated the importance of the epicardium in the development of the heart. During embryogenesis, these epithelial cells provide the progenitors for the epicardium, coronary smooth muscle, endothelium, and cardiac fibroblasts. The epicardium sends important signals to the developing myocardium. Still, analysis of these epithelial cells has lagged behind that of other cardiac cell types largely because of the lack of a defined experimental cell system in which epicardial cell differentiation can be studied. The present report examines the developmental potential of a cell line derived from rat epicardial mesothelial cells. These analyses demonstrate that the cell line retains many characteristics of the intact epithelium, including the ability to form a polarized epithelium and express many epicardial genes. Our data show for the first time that these cells retain the ability to produce mesenchyme in response to specific growth factors and, importantly, to generate smooth muscle cells. Thus, this study provides evidence that these cells can serve as an important model system for the analysis of the cellular and molecular mechanisms that govern epicardial development and function.


Key Words: epicardium • vasculogenesis • Bves protein • coronary development


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
The heart is composed of several different cell types, including cardiac myocytes, endocardial endothelial cells, fibroblasts, vascular smooth muscle, vascular endothelial cells, and epicardial epithelium. These cell types have varying functions in the normal adult heart and have distinct responses to disease and injury. In addition, these cells have distinct embryonic origins.

Myocardial and endocardial cells arise from the lateral splanchnic mesoderm1–4 and are the only resident cells in the heart until the looping phase of cardiac development (stage 15 in the chick and 9.5 postcoital days in the mouse).5–7 Numerous studies reviewed by Fishman and Chien8 have examined the differentiation potential of these two cell types. At the looping stage of heart development, the proepicardial organ (PEO), an epithelial structure derived from the septum transversum, migrates to and over the surface of the myocardium to form the epicardium/visceral pericardium and pericardium.6,9,10 Later, a subpopulation of epicardial cells undergoes an epithelial/mesenchymal transition (EMT) and migrates throughout the substance of the trabeculating myocardium.10,11 These mesenchymal cells give rise to cardiac fibroblasts, vascular endothelium, and smooth muscle of the coronary system, and the remaining epithelium becomes the epicardium.10 The generation of vasculogenic cells from a mesothelium is a unique mechanism of blood vessel formation in vertebrate development.

In the adult heart, the epicardium is a simple squamous epithelium and shares characteristics with other mesothelia, such as pleural epithelium and peritoneum. As stated above, the blood vessels and fibroblasts of the connective tissue space are derived from the epicardium. A major function of adult epicardial/pericardial epithelium is to provide a smooth surface on which the heart slides during contraction. In addition, this epithelium serves as a seal in the production and sequestration of pericardial fluid in the pericardial space.

Recent studies have focused attention on the importance of epicardial-myocardial interactions during development and on the essential role the epicardium plays in heart development. For example, the EMT of epicardium is regulated by a FOG2-dependent pathway from the myocardium that likely involves growth factor signaling from the myocardium to the epicardium.12,13 Although genetic and experimental analyses of heart development have identified factors that are essential in coronary vasculogenesis, the molecular basis of these developmental processes is unknown.

Little is understood about differentiation of the epicardium. This deficiency is particularly acute as data showing the essential interplay between epicardium and myocardium for proper heart development emerge. In addition, the potential for the epicardium to "reinitiate or recapitulate" its developmental program after injury and disease is an unexplored area of research. This gap in our current understanding of cardiac biology is due in large part to the lack of a defined in vitro experimental cell model to analyze epicardial cell differentiation. In an effort to establish an in vitro system for the analysis of epicardial differentiation, we examined a cell line derived from rat epicardial mesothelioma by Eid and colleagues14,15 (epicardial/mesothelial cells [EMCs]). Those studies detailed the derivation of EMCs from the epicardium and described the influence of EMCs on the contractility and differentiation of cultured cardiac myocytes. The epicardially derived EMC line potentially represents a unique possibility to examine epicardial differentiation and the mechanism to generate vasculogenic cells from this mesothelium. The present study focuses on elucidating the developmental potential of EMCs and establishing an in vitro system to study coronary vasculogenesis. Our data show that EMCs retain many characteristics of adult and embryonic epicardia, including the formation of a polarized epithelium and expression of many mesothelial/epicardial genes. Importantly, we demonstrate for the first time that these cells respond to specific growth factors to produce mesenchyme and, subsequently, smooth muscle cells. Thus, these results suggest that EMCs retain much of the differentiation potential of embryonic epicardium and demonstrate the utility of these cells as a model system for the analysis of epicardial development and coronary vessel differentiation.


*    Materials and Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Materials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Cell Culture Conditions
EMCs were obtained from Dr Eid (University of Ottawa, Canada)14 and grown in DMEM containing 4.5 mg/mL glucose, 4 mmol/L L-glutamine with 10% FBS, and 10 µg/mL penicillin/streptomycin. Incubation conditions were 37°C and 5% CO2. Cells were passaged by rinsing once with PBS, followed by trypsinization with 0.05% trypsin-EDTA for 2 minutes. We have found that EMCs can be seeded at very low or clonal densities in complete media. EMCs do not require special attention under normal growth conditions. They are also able to grow under low-calcium or serum-free conditions, forming a monolayer as observed in normal conditions. At present, we have only obtained low but successful transfection of EMCs using standard phosphate, lipofectamine, or electroporation methods. We have maintained these cells for a period of >3 years.

Analysis of RNA Expression
Tissues from rats used for RNA isolation were frozen at -70°C immediately after excision. Total RNA was prepared from cells and tissues by use of a homogenizer and Trizol reagent (GIBCO-BRL) per the manufacturer’s instructions, and RNA samples were stored at -70°C until the time of use.

Reverse transcription (RT)–polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis was used to analyze the expression of specific mRNAs in EMCs. Primer sequences are shown in the Table. The thermocycler profile used was as follows: room temperature: 48°C, 45 minutes; 94°C, 5 minutes; PCR: 95°C, 30 seconds; 53.8°C, 1 minute; 68°C, 1 minute 20 seconds; 40 cycles. Annealing temperatures varied with different primer sets (see Table).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Primers Used for RT-PCR in Gene Expression

Immunofluorescence Microscopy
Immunofluorescence procedures have been described previously.11,16 Primary antibodies used to detect epithelial markers and epicardial markers in these studies were as follows: B846 (anti-Bves, 1:100),16 monoclonal anti–E-cadherin (1:200, Transduction Laboratory), monoclonal anti–ß catenin (1:200, Sigma), polyclonal anti–ZO-1 (1:200, Zymed), monoclonal anti-connexin43 (1:200, Sigma), polyclonal anti–WT-1 (c-19, 1:200, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and Alexa Fluor 488 Phalloidin (1:200, Molecular Probes). Primary antibodies used to detect smooth muscle marker were as follows: monoclonal anti–smooth muscle {alpha}-actin (1:200; Sigma), monoclonal anti-desmin (1:200, Sigma), monoclonal anti-myosin (smooth muscle) clone hSM-v (1:200, Sigma), and anti–platelet and endothelial cell adhesion molecule (anti-PECAM, gift from Dr Albelda, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia) for an endothelial marker. Secondary antibodies to rabbit or murine IgG were either Cy2- or Cy3-conjugated (Jackson Immunoresearch) and used at the manufacturer’s suggested dilutions. DAPI was used for nucleus detection. Fluorescence microscopes (Olympus BX60) were used, and pictures were taken with an attached camera system (Olympus PM-30).

Growth Factor Treatment
EMCs were seeded at low density in chamber slides (Nalge Nunc International Corp) in standard culture medium. Cells were incubated in growth factor–supplemented media (epidermal growth factor [EGF], platelet-derived growth factor [PDGF], transforming growth factor-ß1, and basic fibroblast growth factor [bFGF], all from ICN) without serum for 24 hours, at which time the medium was replaced with fresh medium containing the same conditioned growth factors and incubated for another 24 hours. Control experiments determined the range of concentrations over which these growth factors are effective; 10 to 40 ng/mL was used for all factors in these studies. Cells were scored for mesenchymal transition by morphological changes, rearrangement of the actin cytoskeleton using phalloidin, and translocation of E-cadherin from the cell surface.11,16,17 After 24 or 48 hours of incubation in growth factor–containing medium, the cells were fixed with 70% methanol, permeabilized with 0.25% Triton X-100, and subjected to immunofluorescence analysis as described above.

Smooth Muscle Differentiation
EMCs were cultured under normal growth conditions, and the expression of smooth muscle markers was examined by RT-PCR, as described above, and by immunofluorescence analysis using the antibodies listed above. Primer sequences and annealing temperatures are listed in the Table. To detect smooth muscle–positive cells on growth factor stimulation, cells were cultured in low-calcium medium to maximize the frequency of EMT, and EGF, PDGF, and PDGF-AA (all from ICN) were added at 10 ng/mL. Cultures were incubated for 48 hours and examined for smooth muscle gene expression by immunofluorescence.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
EMCs Form a Polarized Epithelium and Express Epicardial Cell Markers
The epicardium is a polarized simple squamous epithelium, with the apical surface directed toward the pericardial cavity18; thus, we first determined whether EMCs retain the ability to form and maintain a simple epithelium. EMCs were passaged, plated at low density, and allowed to grow. At confluence, EMCs remain in a single layer and do not form multilayered structures. EMCs were tested for their ability to traffic E-cadherin and Bves to the lateral cell surface as seen in vivo. EMCs grown in standard medium with serum do not undergo significant levels of EMT. Immunocytochemical analysis of dispersed single EMCs shows that E-cadherin is widely dispersed within the cytoplasm (Figures 1A and 1D). However, when EMCs make contact with one another, E-cadherin is localized to the membrane at points of contact (Figures 1A, 1B, 1D, and 1E). E-cadherin and ß-catenin, which are components of the adherens junction, are localized around the circumference of cells in confluent EMCs (Figures 1 1C, 1F, and 1J), indicating that a polarized epithelium has formed. Bves, which is also a marker of epicardial epithelial formation, was monitored and determined to have the same pattern of staining as that seen with E-cadherin17 (Figures 1G through 1I). In addition, ZO-1, a marker of tight junctions, is localized at the cell surface (Figure 1K).



View larger version (113K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Rat EMCs form an epithelial sheet. Formation of epithelial sheets was observed by phase-contrast and immunofluorescence imaging (A through K). E-cadherin (green, A through C), a marker for epithelial sheet formation, localizes to the sites of cell-cell contact (A, arrow) and is detected around entire cell surface once cells form an epithelial sheet (C). E-cadherin is not detected at the free surface of cells (B, arrowhead). Phase-contrast images of epithelial sheet formation are shown (D through F). Bves (red, G through I) staining was also used as a marker of epicardial sheet formation. Bves, like E-cadherin, localizes to cell-cell contact sites (G, arrows) and is not observed in contact-free areas (H, arrowhead). Additional polarized epithelial markers are detected. ß-Catenin, a component of the adherent junction, is localized in the same pattern as E-cadherin (J). ZO-1, a tight junction marker, is also detected at the cell periphery in epithelial sheets (K).

Although no epicardium-specific gene has been identified, the expression patterns of several genes are highly enriched in this cell type. Included in these gene products are transcription factors (WT-119 and Tbx1820), membrane proteins (connexin4321 and Bves11), and cytoskeletal elements (cytokeratin22). As seen in Figure 2A, WT-1, Tbx18, and Bves RT-PCR products are readily detected in EMC mRNA, as is the positive control, GAPDH (Figure 2). These data support the idea that the EMC is not only an epithelial cell but that it also expresses those gene products enriched in epicardium. Additional immunofluorescence microscopy determined that EMCs direct cytoskeletal, membrane, and nuclear proteins in a manner that resembles the in vivo situation. For example, connexin43, which has been shown to be essential for embryonic epicardial formation and migration,23 is present at the cell membrane (Figures 2A through 2C). In addition, WT-1 protein, which is detected in the mesothelia, including the epicardium, during embryogenesis,19,24 is detected in the EMC nuclei. Thus, this expression profile suggests that EMCs retain a phenotype characteristic of the epicardium.



View larger version (86K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Epicardium-specific genes are expressed in EMCs. Epicardial gene expression in EMCs was analyzed by RT-PCR using gene-specific primers listed in the Table. As seen in a 1% agarose gel, the expressions of WT-1, tbx18, and bves were observed at their predicted sizes (Table). GAPDH was used as a positive control; myogenin (a skeletal muscle-specific gene), as the negative control. Protein expression and trafficking were also examined in immunofluorescence images (A through C). Bves localization (A) is observed at the cell surface, whereas expression and nuclear localization of WT-1 were uniform in all cells (B). Membrane localization of connexin43 was also detected (C).

Specific Growth Factors Induce Mesenchyme Formation From EMCs
Epicardium plays an essential role in the maturation of the myocardium and generation of the coronary vasculature. Mesenchyme production from the epicardium is one of the critical events in the generation of coronary vessels. Analysis of its regulation has drawn interest recently13,16; thus, we sought to determine whether EMCs could be induced to undergo EMT using selected growth factors under serum-free conditions. Cells were allowed to form epithelial sheets before growth factor addition and were assayed for mesenchyme production after an additional 24 hours. As used in prior studies, cell morphology (the transition from epithelial to elongated fibroblast-like shape), rearrangement of the actin cytoskeleton with production of stress fibers, and disruption of cadherin localization at the cell membrane25–27 were assayed as indicators of EMT. Under serum-free conditions without growth factor addition, EMCs form epithelial sheets within 24 hours and continue to grow as epithelial sheets until the termination of the experiment at 48 hours. If cells are allowed to grow, cultures become confluent monolayers. E-cadherin and Bves were detected at cell-cell borders, demonstrating that the epithelial sheet is complete in the absence of serum (Figures 3Aa and 3Ba). In addition, EMT was not observed from these sheets at any time in the absence of added growth factors.



View larger version (117K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. EMCs undergo EMT in response to growth factor stimulation. EMCs were cultured under serum-free conditions in the presence or absence of growth factors. A, Phase-contrast microscopy. EMCs form an epithelial sheet and maintain a healthy appearance after 48 hours in serum-free conditions (a). After 24 hours of incubation with EGF (40 ng/mL), many cells exhibit an elongated fibroblast-like shape, particularly those cells at the edge of epithelial sheets (b). Similarly, when cultures were incubated with bFGF (40 ng/mL), cells lost contact with the epithelial sheet (c). B, Changes in protein localization. EMT was also monitored by changes in localization of E-cadherin (E-cad) and production of stress fibers. Control and experimental cultures were doubly stained with anti–E-cad and fluorescently labeled with phalloidin. Control cultures show a tightly associated epithelial sheet with sharp E-cad localization (a; anti–E-cad, red) at the cell membrane and uniform cortical actin at cell-cell boundaries (d; phalloidin, green). EGF-treated cultures exhibit diffused E-cad localization within the epithelial sheet (b, white box) with production of stress fibers and elongated cell shape (e, white box). BFGF-treated cultures also exhibit patches of cells with diffuse E-cad localization (c, white box) and stress fiber production (f, white box).

Morabito et al13 recently demonstrated that bFGF induced EMT from the epicardium in vivo and in cultured PEO explants; thus, we began our studies with this growth factor. At 10 ng/mL, only minimal disruption of the epithelial sheets was observed at 24 or 48 hours. E-cadherin localization was seen at the cell membrane, and cells maintained epithelium-like morphology similar to that seen in control cells without growth factor in serum-free conditions (authors’ unpublished data, 2002). In contrast, when cultures were incubated with 20 or 40 ng/mL bFGF for 24 hours, numerous fibroblast-like cells became detached from the edge of the epithelial sheet, where the most prominent region of EMT is observed (Figure 3Ac). Epithelial sheet formation in treated cultures proceeds more slowly because of the prominence of EMT and freely migratory mesenchyme. Cells in the middle of epithelial sheets established before growth factor treatment produced stress fibers (as visualized with phalloidin) and showed disruption of cadherin at the cell membrane (Figures 3Bc and 3Bf). Interestingly, after 48 hours of incubation, stress fiber formation was reduced (data not shown), and immunocytochemistry demonstrated the presence of E-cadherin at the membrane of most EMCs regardless of growth factor concentration. This suggests a time dependence of the response.

EGF has also been shown to be a potent inducer of EMT in many cell types.26,28 When cells were incubated with 20 or 40 ng/mL EGF, very large numbers of cells were converted to an elongated morphology at the edge of the epithelial sheet (Figure 3Ab). E-cadherin localization at the membrane was also disrupted (Figure 3Bb), and stress fibers were apparent by phalloidin staining (Figure 3Be), suggesting that these cells had undergone EMT in the areas of established epithelium. Again, the appearance of stress fibers in treated cultures was greatly reduced after 48 hours of incubation, and epithelial sheet formation was reinitiated. Still, EGF-treated cultures contained patches of cells that exhibit defuse E-cadherin localization after 48 hours of treatment, suggesting that epithelium has not been fully reconstituted or that EMT persists (data not shown). When cultures were treated with PDGF-AA, PDGF-AB, endothelin-1, and acidic fibroblast growth factor, no evidence of EMT was apparent under serum-free conditions, suggesting that those growth factors are not sufficient to initiate and carry out the entire EMT processes in EMCs. Taken together, our data demonstrate that EMCs are capable of responding to specific signals implicated in the EMT process during embryonic development.

EMCs Can Differentiate Into Smooth Muscle Cells
One of the most important developmental properties of embryonic epicardium is the ability to produce progenitor cells that later differentiate into components of the coronary vasculature.7,10,29 To determine whether EMCs retain this essential developmental potential, expressions of markers of smooth muscle and endothelial lineage were assessed by RT-PCR and immunocytochemistry.

Our initial studies into the vasculogenic potential of EMCs in standard growth medium with 10% serum used RT-PCR analysis to detect smooth muscle gene products. As shown in Figure 4, {alpha}-smooth muscle actin, calponin, and {alpha}-smooth muscle tropomyosin transcripts were clearly apparent in these analyses (Figure 4A). These results suggest either that all EMCs express smooth muscle genes or that a specific population of cells converted to a smooth muscle phenotype. To distinguish between these two possibilities, antibodies directed against smooth muscle markers were to stain EMC cultures. As seen in Figures 4B through 4D, smooth muscle myosin, desmin, and {alpha}-smooth muscle actin were present at high levels in isolated patches of cells in the epithelial sheet and not at low levels in the majority of cultured cells (Figures 4B through 4D). The frequency of these cells in culture was <5% of the total number of cells and was maintained at that rate after repeated passage. Smooth muscle cell differentiation was rare or not observed under serum-free conditions over the time course of study (48 hours). These data suggest that factors within normal growth medium with serum could induce a smooth muscle phenotype from EMCs.



View larger version (99K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. EMCs differentiate into vasculogenic cell types. In panel A, to determine whether EMCs express smooth muscle–specific genes, we have performed RT-PCR with several smooth muscle gene primers (Table). Lanes 1 to 3 show {alpha}-smooth muscle actin, calponin, and {alpha}-tropomyosin, respectively. Expression of those smooth muscle gene products was detected in cultures that contained serum (lanes 1 to 3). In lanes 4 to 6, the same primer reaction was performed without RT, demonstrating the dependence of RNA for the reaction product. In panels B through D, EMCs were cultured under standard conditions with serum for 48 hours. Patches of cells were positive for smooth muscle actin (B), desmin (C), and smooth muscle myosin (D) proteins. Cell morphology appears to remain as an intact epithelium; however, smooth muscle–specific markers were positive for these cells. When EMCs were cultured in serum-free, calcium-free conditions (B through D) with EGF (E) or PDGF (heterodimer [F] or AA homodimers [G]), smooth muscle actin–positive cells were observed to be detached from the epithelial sheet. Note the changes in morphology of these cells.

To determine whether specific growth factors could promote smooth muscle cell differentiation from this epicardial cell line, we cultured EMCs in serum-free conditions with the addition of selected factors. With the addition of EGF, PDGF-AA, or PDGF-AB, smooth muscle cells were readily detected 48 hours after treatment. Patches of cells were observed within the epithelial sheet, much like that seen in standard serum-containing medium (data not shown). The frequency of these cells was again {approx}5% of the culture. If calcium was depleted from the growth factor–containing medium to promote EMT, smooth muscle–positive cells were readily detected and had clearly altered cell morphology and apparently detached from the epithelial sheet (Figures 4E through 4G). Taken together, these data clearly demonstrate that EMCs retain the potential to produce smooth muscle cells. Interestingly, PECAM-positive endothelial cells were not detected in serum or growth factor–treated cultures on a consistent basis within any experimental group. At present, it is not clear whether these data suggest that EMCs have either a limited potential or no potential to form endothelial cells or that the proper growth factor(s)/condition(s) for this process has not been identified.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
Recent data have demonstrated that the epicardium plays an essential role in the development of the coronary vascular system and is an important regulator of myocardial differentiation. Although insight into the role of the epicardium in heart development has been gained from in vivo studies, an in vitro system is clearly needed to advance the field. Our present data demonstrate that EMCs retain much of the developmental potential seen in embryonic epicardium, including cellular and molecular mechanisms, to produce smooth muscle cells. Furthermore, these findings suggest that EMCs may serve as a model for the in vitro analysis of epicardial cell growth and differentiation. This cell line will provide a powerful tool to investigate the cellular and molecular mechanisms regulating epicardial differentiation during coronary and heart development.

Expression of Epicardial Gene Products in EMCs
The epicardium is a mesothelium. Mesothelia line or cover body spaces such as the peritoneal, pleural, and pericardial cavities and provide a smooth surface on which organs move. In addition, this specialized simple squamous epithelial structure provides a barrier in the compartmentalization of body spaces. In general, mesothelia arrive "late" during the generation of organs,30–32 migrating over an already formed primordium. Recent data have shown that a diverse array of gene products is expressed in these distinct, but functionally related, epithelia.20,22,24,33 The present study reveals that EMCs express specific genes that are enriched in mesothelia, such as the epicardium. In addition, EMCs retain the ability to form a polarized simple epithelium and produce smooth muscle progenitors; both are characteristic of the epicardial phenotype. Other recent studies suggesting the interaction of the epicardia and myocardia also point to the potential utility of EMCs.12,13 These cells may prove invaluable in the analysis of tropic factors emanating from epicardium that play a role(s) in the generation and maintenance of myocardium, and they may be a reliable source of "pure" epicardium for the production of gene arrays.

Epicardial Differentiation and EMT In Vitro
The importance of EMT in epicardial and coronary vessel differentiation has been discussed.10,12,13,29,34–37 Our present data clearly demonstrate that EMCs respond to specific growth factors with the acquisition of a fibroblast-like phenotype, rearrangement of the actin cytoskeleton, and disruption of cadherins at the cell membrane, all indicators of EMT.17,26,28,38 The response of EMCs to bFGF mirrors that of embryonic epicardium in vivo.13 In addition, although EGF has not yet been shown to induce EMT from embryonic epicardium, the response of cells to EGF is particularly interesting inasmuch as this growth factor signals through the receptor tyrosine kinase pathway and has been shown to induce EMT by disruption of the intercellular adhesion26,39,40 that we observed in the present study. It will be critical to unravel how these signaling pathways are synchronized in cells. Studies on this topic may lead to a more thorough understanding of how some of these cells remain in the epicardium while a subpopulation undergoes EMT, eventually becoming coronary vascular components.

EMCs Can Differentiate Into Smooth Muscle
Production of vasculogenic cells via EMT from the epicardium is a unique situation in vertebrate development. Many studies indicate that endothelial cells induce smooth muscle differentiation from "local mesenchyme."41 Our current data conclusively show that EMCs (epithelial cells) can differentiate into smooth muscle cells that express several proteins characteristic of PEO-derived smooth muscle.37 Although EMC-derived smooth muscle cells may go through a mesenchymal phase, the clonal nature of this cell line predicts that the original progenitors of these cells were epithelial in nature. This unique mode of smooth muscle development seen from the epicardium is retained in EMCs. These smooth muscle cells constitute <5% of the cells after growth in serum or growth factor treatment, but it is clear that EMCs have retained their ability to produce smooth muscle cells at this frequency after repeated passage. This finding suggests that the production of smooth muscle from this cell line is a heritable trait. In addition, EMCs are capable of producing smooth muscle cells in the absence of cardiac myocytes and differentiated endothelial cells, albeit within a serum-dependent or growth factor-dependent manner. This suggests that epicardial cells are capable of response to specific factors to produce smooth muscle in the absence of complex intercellular contacts or interaction with large numbers of endothelial cells. Whether EMCs can give rise to endothelial cells is an issue to be resolved. Our study to determine whether EMCs differentiate into endothelial cells was not conclusive. At present, we have not determined whether these cells are incapable of producing endothelium or that the correct signaling molecule has not been identified. Further analysis of EMC differentiation may lead to insights into the unique form of vasculogenesis carried out by the embryonic epicardium.

It is interesting to note that EMCs produce smooth muscle cells at a fairly consistent frequency even after repeated passages. During the generation of coronary arteries, the epicardium produces smooth muscle cells at some constant rate, whereas other epicardial cells retain their epithelial state. The cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying the selection of smooth muscle precursors from the epicardium are not currently understood but may involve intercellular interactions between cells in the epicardium. One might speculate that Notch-Delta41–43 or other paracrine signaling systems (such as transforming growth factor-ß)13 that have been implicated in other epithelial cell lineage decisions might be involved in the epicardial differentiation pathway. It would be of interest to determine whether such a system is involved in regulating the production of mesenchyme and/or smooth muscle from the epicardium. The production of smooth muscle from EMCs at a predictable frequency as demonstrated in the present study suggests that some or all regulatory mechanisms present in the epicardium are retained by this cell line. The present system may prove to be a valuable model to unravel these developmental processes.

Possible Stem Cell Populations in Epicardium
In the present study, we have shown that EMCs, a cell type isolated from the pericardium/epicardium, retains the ability to produce smooth muscle cells. The possibility that the epicardium may contain/give rise to a vasculogenic stem cell population is raised. From the point of view of coronary disease, this is an intriguing hypothesis. To generate vessels in the damaged heart, it is important to have a cell population that is capable of producing all of the vascular cell types. Our data support the hypothesis that a homogeneous population of cells can differentiate into a smooth muscle cell type and potentially other cell types while maintaining the epicardial cell phenotype.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This study was supported by NIH grant PO1 HL-67105-02. We thank Dr Eid for the generous gift of the cell line that we used in this studies. We also thank members of the laboratory for thoughtful discussion and critical reading.

Received February 15, 2002; revision received October 17, 2002; accepted January 28, 2003.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Rawles ME. The heart-forming region of the early chick blastoderm. Physiol Zool. 1943; 16: 22–42.
  2. Stalsberg H. Regional mitotic activity in the precardiac mesoderm and differentiating heart tube in the chick embryo. Dev Biol. 1969; 20: 18–45.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Coffin JD, Poole TJ. Embryonic vascular development: immunohistochemical identification of the origin and subsequent morphogenesis of the major vessel primordia in quail embryos. Development. 1988; 102: 735–748.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Gonzalez-Sanchez A, Bader D. In vitro analysis of cardiac progenitor cell differentiation. Dev Biol. 1990; 139: 197–209.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Manasek FJ. Embryonic development of the heart: a light and electron microscope study of myocardial development in the early chick embryo. J Morphol. 1968; 125: 329–366.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Viragh S, Challice CE. The origin of the epicardium and the embryonic myocardial circulation in the mouse. Anat Rec. 1981; 201: 157–168.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Mikawa T, Fischman DA, Dougherty JP, Brown AMC. In vitro analysis of new LacZ retrovirus vector suitable of cell lineage marking in avian and other species. Exp Cell Res. 1991; 195: 516–552.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Fishman MC, Chien KR. Fashioning the vertebrate heart: earliest embryonic decisions. Development. 1997; 124: 2099–2117.[Abstract]
  9. Viragh S, Gittenberger-de Groot AC, Poelmann RE, Kalman F. Early development of quail heart epicardium and associated vascular and glandular structures. Anat Embryol (Berl). 1993; 188: 381–393.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Mikawa T, Gourdie RG. Pericardial mesoderm generates a population of coronary smooth muscle cells migrating into the heart along with ingrowth of the epicardial organ. Dev Biol. 1996; 174: 221–232.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Reese DE, Zavaljevski M, Streiff NL, Bader D. Bves: a novel gene expressed during coronary blood vessel development. Dev Biol. 1999; 209: 159–171.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Tevosian SG, Deconinck AE, Tanaka M, Schinke M, Litovsky SH, Izumo S, Fujiwara Y, Orkin SH. FOG-2, a cofactor for GATA transcription factors, is essential for heart morphogenesis and development of coronary vessels from epicardium. Cell. 2000; 101: 729–739.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Morabito CJ, Dettman RW, Kattan J, Collier JM, Bristow J. Positive and negative regulation of epicardial-mesenchymal transformation during avian heart development. Dev Biol. 2001; 234: 204–215.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Eid H, de Bold ML, Chen JH, de Bold AJ. Epicardial mesothelial cells synthesize and release endothelin. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1994; 24: 715–720.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Eid H, Larson DM, Springhorn JP, Attawia MA, Nayak RC, Smith TW, Kelly RA. Role of epicardial mesothelial cells in the modification of phenotype and function of adult rat ventricular myocytes in primary coculture. Circ Res. 1992; 71: 40–50.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Wada AM, Reese DE, Bader DM. Bves: prototype of a new class of cell adhesion molecules expressed during coronary artery development. Development. 2001; 128: 2085–2093.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Cano A, Perez-Moreno MA, Rodrigo I, Locascio A, Blanco MJ, del Barrio MG, Portillo F, Nieto MA. The transcription factor snail controls epithelial-mesenchymal transitions by repressing E-cadherin expression. Nat Cell Biol. 2000; 2: 76–83.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Rhodin JAG. An Atlas of Histology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1975.
  19. Moore AW, McInnes L, Kreidberg J, Hastie ND, Schedl A. YAC complementation shows a requirement for Wt1 in the development of epicardium, adrenal gland and throughout nephrogenesis. Development. 1999; 126: 1845–1857.[Abstract]
  20. Kraus F, Haenig B, Kispert A. Cloning and expression analysis of the mouse T-box gene Tbx18. Mech Dev. 2001; 100: 83–86.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Reaume AG, de Sousa PA, Kulkarni S, Langille BL, Zhu D, Davies TC, Juneja SC, Kidder GM, Rossant J. Cardiac malformation in neonatal mice lacking connexin43. Science. 1995; 267: 1831–1835.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Vrancken Peeters MP, Mentink MM, Poelmann RE, Gittenberger-de Groot AC. Cytokeratins as a marker for epicardial formation in the quail embryo. Anat Embryol (Berl). 1995; 191: 503–508.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Li WE, Waldo K, Linask KL, Chen T, Wessels A, Parmacek MS, Kirby ML, Lo CW. An essential role for connexin43 gap junctions in mouse coronary artery development. Development. 2002; 129: 2031–2042.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Carmona R, Gonzalez-Iriarte M, Perez-Pomares JM, Munoz-Chapuli R. Localization of the Wilms’ tumour protein WT1 in avian embryos. Cell Tissue Res. 2001; 303: 173–186.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Savagner P, Yamada KM, Thiery JP. The zinc-finger protein slug causes desmosome dissociation, an initial and necessary step for growth factor-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition. J Cell Biol. 1997; 137: 1403–1419.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Boyer B, Valles AM, Edme N. Induction and regulation of epithelial-mesenchymal transitions. Biochem Pharmacol. 2000; 60: 1091–1099.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Bhowmick NA, Ghiassi M, Bakin A, Aakre M, Lundquist CA, Engel ME, Arteaga CL, Moses HL. Transforming growth factor-ß1 mediates epithelial to mesenchymal transdifferentiation through a RhoA-dependent mechanism. Mol Biol Cell. 2001; 12: 27–36.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Hemavathy K, Ashraf SI, Ip YT. Snail/slug family of repressors: slowly going into the fast lane of development and cancer. Gene. 2000; 257: 1–12.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Dettman RW, Denetclaw W Jr, Ordahl CP, Bristow J. Common epicardial origin of coronary vascular smooth muscle, perivascular fibroblasts, and intermyocardial fibroblasts in the avian heart. Dev Biol. 1998; 193: 169–181.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Meier S. Development of the chick embryo mesoblast: pronephros, lateral plate, and early vasculature. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1980; 55: 291–306.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Gattone VHII, Morse DE. Pleuroperitoneal canal closure in the rat. Anat Rec. 1984; 208: 445–460.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Mikawa T. Retroviral analysis of cardiac morphogenesis: discontinuous formation of coronary vessels. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992; 89: 9504–9508.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Hidai H, Bardales R, Goodwin R, Quertermous T, Quertermous EE. Cloning of capsulin, a basic helix-loop-helix factor expressed in progenitor cells of the pericardium and the coronary arteries. Mech Dev. 1998; 73: 33–43.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Carmona R, Gonzalez-Iriarte M, Macias D, Perez-Pomares JM, Garcia-Garrido L, Munoz-Chapuli R. Immunolocalization of the transcription factor Slug in the developing avian heart. Anat Embryol (Berl). 2000; 201: 103–109.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Manner J, Perez-Pomares JM, Macias D, Munoz-Chapuli R. The origin, formation and developmental significance of the epicardium: a review. Cells Tissues Organs. 2001; 169: 89–103.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Perez-Pomares JM, Macias D, Garcia-Garrido L, Munoz-Chapuli R. The origin of the subepicardial mesenchyme in the avian embryo: an immunohistochemical and quail-chick chimera study. Dev Biol. 1998; 200: 57–68.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Landerholm TE, Dong XR, Lu J, Belaguli NS, Schwartz RJ, Majesky MW. A role for serum response factor in coronary smooth muscle differentiation from proepicardial cells. Development. 1999; 126: 2053–2062.[Abstract]
  38. Kim JB, Islam S, Kim YJ, Prudoff RS, Sass KM, Wheelock MJ, Johnson KR. N-Cadherin extracellular repeat 4 mediates epithelial to mesenchymal transition and increased motility. J Cell Biol. 2000; 151: 1193–1206.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Birchmeier C, Birchmeier W, Brand-Saberi B. Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in cancer progression. Acta Anat. 1996; 156: 217–226.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Solic N, Davies DE. Differential effects of EGF and amphiregulin on adhesion molecule expression and migration of colon carcinoma cells. Exp Cell Res. 1997; 234: 465–476.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  41. Kume T, Jiang H, Topczewska JM, Hogan BL. The murine winged helix transcription factors, Foxc1 and Foxc2, are both required for cardiovascular development and somatogenesis. Genes Dev. 2001; 15: 2470–2482.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Gonzalez-Reyes A, St Johnston D. Patterning of the follicle cell epithelium along the anterior-posterior axis during Drosophila oogenesis. Development. 1998; 125: 2837–2846.[Abstract]
  43. Brittan M, Wright NA. Gastrointestinal stem cells. J Pathol. 2002; 197: 492–509.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Stem CellsHome page
C. Castaldo, F. Di Meglio, D. Nurzynska, G. Romano, C. Maiello, C. Bancone, P. Muller, M. Bohm, M. Cotrufo, and S. Montagnani
CD117-Positive Cells in Adult Human Heart Are Localized in the Subepicardium, and Their Activation Is Associated with Laminin-1 and {alpha}6 Integrin Expression
Stem Cells, July 1, 2008; 26(7): 1723 - 1731.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
T. K. Smith, H. A. Hager, R. Francis, D. M. Kilkenny, C. W. Lo, and D. M. Bader
Bves directly interacts with GEFT, and controls cell shape and movement through regulation of Rac1/Cdc42 activity
PNAS, June 17, 2008; 105(24): 8298 - 8303.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
E. M. Oxford, H. Musa, K. Maass, W. Coombs, S. M. Taffet, and M. Delmar
Connexin43 Remodeling Caused by Inhibition of Plakophilin-2 Expression in Cardiac Cells
Circ. Res., September 28, 2007; 101(7): 703 - 711.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
E.M. Winter, R.W. Grauss, B. Hogers, J. van Tuyn, R. van der Geest, H. Lie-Venema, R. V. Steijn, S. Maas, M.C. DeRuiter, A.A.F. deVries, et al.
Preservation of Left Ventricular Function and Attenuation of Remodeling After Transplantation of Human Epicardium-Derived Cells Into the Infarcted Mouse Heart
Circulation, August 21, 2007; 116(8): 917 - 927.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Stem CellsHome page
J. van Tuyn, D. E. Atsma, E. M. Winter, I. van der Velde-van Dijke, D. A. Pijnappels, N. A.M. Bax, S. Knaan-Shanzer, A. C. Gittenberger-de Groot, R. E. Poelmann, A. van der Laarse, et al.
Epicardial Cells of Human Adults Can Undergo an Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition and Obtain Characteristics of Smooth Muscle Cells In Vitro
Stem Cells, February 1, 2007; 25(2): 271 - 278.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. N. Ripley, M. E. Osler, C. V. E. Wright, and D. Bader
Xbves is a regulator of epithelial movement during early Xenopus laevis development
PNAS, January 17, 2006; 103(3): 614 - 619.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
B. Wilm, A. Ipenberg, N. D. Hastie, J. B. E. Burch, and D. M. Bader
The serosal mesothelium is a major source of smooth muscle cells of the gut vasculature
Development, December 1, 2005; 132(23): 5317 - 5328.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
M. E. Osler, M. S. Chang, and D. M. Bader
Bves modulates epithelial integrity through an interaction at the tight junction
J. Cell Sci., October 15, 2005; 118(20): 4667 - 4678.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
A. N. Ripley, M. S. Chang, and D. M. Bader
Bves Is Expressed in the Epithelial Components of the Retina, Lens, and Cornea
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., August 1, 2004; 45(8): 2475 - 2483.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
A. M. Wada, S. G. Willet, and D. Bader
Coronary Vessel Development: A Unique Form of Vasculogenesis
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., December 1, 2003; 23(12): 2138 - 2145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
C. J. Hatcher and C. T. Basson
Modeling Development of the Epicardium and Coronary Vasculature: In Vitro Veritas?
Circ. Res., March 21, 2003; 92(5): 477 - 479.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
92/5/525    most recent
01.RES.0000060484.11032.0Bv1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wada, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bader, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed