| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Molecular Medicine |
From the Molecular Endocrinology (W.G.T., T.P., H.Q.), Gene Transcription (Y.B., R.D.H.), and Molecular Physiology (D.J.A.) Laboratories, Baker Medical Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Correspondence to Dr Ross Hannan, Baker Medical Research Institute, P.O. Box 6492, St Kilda Road Central, Melbourne 8008, Australia. E-mail ross.hannan{at}baker.edu.au
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
qI and N17Ras, indicating that hypertrophic signaling by the AT1A receptor is via heterotrimeric G protein coupling and downstream Ras pathways. AT1A-mediated cardiomyocyte hypertrophy and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) activation were inhibited by the MAPK kinase inhibitor, PD98059, and the epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor kinase antagonist, AG1478, but not by PKC inhibitor, bisindolylmaleimide-1. Moreover, Ang IIinduced MAPK activation was prevented by treatment with a matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor, consistent with the tyrosine phosphorylation of the EGF receptor in response to AT1A receptor activation. These data unequivocally demonstrate that Ang II can directly promote cardiac myocyte growth via AT1A receptors expressed on these cells and reveal for the first time the important contribution of EGF receptortransactivated MAPK signaling to this process.
Key Words: AT1A receptor angiotensin cardiomyocyte hypertrophy adenovirus EGF receptor transactivation
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
q/11-phospholipase C-ß1 to generate inositol trisphosphate and diacylglycerol, and thereby increase intracellular calcium and activate protein kinase C (PKC).1 Activation of PKC and the calcium-dependent phosphatase, calcineurin, has been linked to Ang IImediated growth.2,3 Activation of AT1 receptors also promotes tyrosine phosphorylation, stimulation of mitogen-activated protein kinases, and growth, particularly in vascular and cardiac cells.1 How AT1 receptors, which lack intrinsic tyrosine kinase activity, induce tyrosine phosphorylation, MAP kinase, and growth factor signaling pathways is not clear, but recent evidence from vascular smooth muscle cells,4 liver epithelial cells,5 and cardiac fibroblasts6 suggest that a major mechanism is the "transactivation"7 of the EGF receptor (EGFR). Cardiac hypertrophy involves cardiomyocyte growth as well as extracellular matrix accumulation and although initially a beneficial adaptive response to increased cardiovascular demand, prolonged hypertrophy results in dilated cardiomyopathy, heart failure, and death.3,8 Clinical and experimental evidence using inhibitors of Ang II production or antagonists of AT1 receptors suggests that inappropriate activation of AT1 receptors in the heart contributes significantly to the process of cardiac hypertrophy.911 This hypertrophy may involve direct activation of AT1 receptors in cardiomyocytes and/or indirect release of growth factors like endothelin-1 (ET-1), transforming growth factor-ß1, and cytokines from cardiac fibroblasts via AT1 receptors on those cells.1215 Recently, Paradis et al11 generated transgenic mice that express AT1 receptors exclusively in cardiomyocytes. These mice, despite normal blood pressure and heart rate, spontaneously develop cardiac hypertrophy and remodeling, display increased cardiac atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and interstitial collagen deposition, and die prematurely of congestive heart failure. This implicates the AT1 receptor in the pathogenesis of cardiac hypertrophy and failure and provides compelling evidence that direct activation of cardiomyocytes by Ang II is sufficient for this process.
In the Paradis study,11 the cardiac AT1 receptor expression in the transgenic animals was very high (>50 000 fmol/mg protein); for comparison, normal heart tissue expresses 10 to 50 fmol AT1 receptor/mg protein, although levels can increase during disease states.1620 Moreover, such in vivo models do not allow a molecular dissection of the cellular signaling pathways that control cardiac hypertrophy. To this end, many groups have used cultured rat neonatal cardiomyocytes as an in vitro model, but unfortunately, attempts to recapitulate Ang IIinduced hypertrophy in these cardiomyocytes have yielded inconsistent results, ostensibly due to low and variable AT1A receptor expression. In our hands, cardiomyocyte cultures produce undetectable/low (
10 fmol/mg protein) levels of endogenous AT1 receptors and fail to hypertrophy in response to Ang II stimulation.
To circumvent these problems, we used adenoviruses21 to efficiently deliver AT1A receptors into neonatal rat cardiomyocytes. These receptors functionally couple Ang II stimulation to cellular signals and phenotypic/genotypic processes that are the hallmarks of cardiac hypertrophy and allow, for the first time, the identification of an essential contribution of EGFR transactivation to this process.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
q inhibitor peptide (G
q305359, hereafter termed G
qI) was from Dr W. Koch25 (Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC). The reporter construct for atrial natriuretic peptide promoter (ANP328-Luc) was from Dr M. Nemer26 (Institut de recherches cliniques de Montreal, Quebec, Canada). Animals were supplied by the Baker Medical Research Institute Animal House and were handled according to protocols approved by the Australian Code of Practice for Care and Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes.
Cell Culture
Cardiomyocytes were isolated from the ventricles of 1-day-old Sprague-Dawley rat pups and plated at high (1250 cells/mm2) or low density (330 cells/mm2) as described.27 Myocytes, which contain less than 5% non-cardiomyocytes as determined microscopically, were purified in some experiments to >99% homogeneity over multiple Percol gradients.28 Where indicated, KCl (50 mmol/L) was added to the medium to prevent spontaneous contraction characteristic of neonatal cardiomyocytes plated at high-density.28,29
Adenoviral Infection of Cardiomyocytes
Twenty-four hours after plating, cardiomyocytes were infected with purified viruses at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.1 to 100, as indicated. A MOI of 100 corresponds to 1x108 PFU, which infected greater than 95% of 1x106 myocytes as defined by green fluorescent protein (GFP) fluorescence.
Induction of Myocyte Hypertrophy
One day after infection with adenovirus, AT1 receptormediated hypertrophy was initiated by adding Ang II (100 nmol/L). After 72 hours of stimulation, cells were harvested and hypertrophy defined as a significant increase in protein content (Lowry assay) in the absence of any significant change in DNA content (Burton assay).
Phalloidin Staining of Actin Filaments
Control and hypertrophic cardiomyocytes were fixed in 4% phosphate buffered paraformaldehyde and stained with TRITC-labeled phalloidin prior to visualization by fluorescence microscopy.
MAPK Assays
Western blots of cardiomyocyte extracts were probed with a monoclonal antibody (NEB BioLabs, E10) to phosphospecific p44/42 MAPK (T202/Y204) and a polyclonal antibody (Santa Cruz, C-16). Active and total MAPK were quantified using ScionImage (www.scioncorp.com) and active MAPK was normalized for total MAPK loading on the gel and expressed as a fold-increase from unstimulated levels.
Reporter Assays
Cardiomyocytes were transfected with equal amounts of plasmid constructs using lipofectamine.27 Hypertrophy was initiated 24 hours after transfection, and cells were harvested 72 hours later and assayed for chloramphenicol transferase (CAT), luciferase, or ß-galactosidase (ßGal) activity.27 The results of the assays were normalized to ßGal expression.
RNase Protection Assays
mRNA for ANP, c-fos, c-jun, and GAPDH was measured by solution hybridization/RNase protection analysis.30
EGFR Phosphorylation
Cardiomyocytes were infected for 3 days with AdNHA-AT1 (MOI, 20), stimulated with Ang II (3 minutes, 100 nmol/L), and the EGFR immunoprecipitated from cell lysates using anti-EGFR antibody (Santa Cruz, 1005). Western blots were probed sequentially with an anti-phosphotyrosine antibody (PY20, Santa Cruz) and the anti-EGFR antibody.
Statistical Analysis
For all multi-group comparisons, data were analyzed by 1-way ANOVA followed by Fishers protected least significant difference for post hoc comparisons. Students t test was used for comparisons between 2 groups. All data are presented as mean±SE, and a value of P<0.05 was considered to be significantly different.
An expanded Materials and Methods section can be found in the online data supplement available at http://www.circresaha.org.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1-adrenergic receptors resulted in significant hypertrophy (129.5±1.2%), demonstrating that the myocytes were capable of responding to hypertrophic stimuli. To determine if the lack of response to Ang II stimulation was due to low levels of AT1A receptor expression, we examined the capacity of Ang II to stimulate cardiac growth in cells infected with an adenovirus (AdNHA-AT1) that directs expression of the AT1A receptor. Cardiomyocytes infected with increasing amounts of AdNHA-AT1 expressed functional, high affinity AT1 receptors with appropriate selectivity for non-peptide antagonists and a capacity for robust phosphorylation and internalization (see online data supplement).
|
Ang IImediated hypertrophy in cells infected with AdNHA-AT1 (126.5±4.8%) was comparable to PE (Figure 1A). The selective AT1 antagonist, candesartan, prevented Ang IIstimulated hypertrophic growth, whereas treatment with vehicle or antagonist alone failed to induce hypertrophy (Figure 1A). Significant hypertrophy (113.1±1.1%) was observed at a MOI of 10 PFU/cell (
200 fmol receptor/mg protein), whereas maximal growth (141.0±1.9%) occurred at 50 PFU/cell (
1000 fmol receptor/mg protein) (Figure 1B). An Ang IIinduced growth curve in AdNHA-AT1infected cardiomyocytes (20 PFU/cell;
500 fmol receptor/mg protein) demonstrated that the EC50 for the hypertrophic effect was 6.8 nmol/L Ang II (Figure 1C).
The hypertrophic effect of Ang II on AdNHA-AT1infected cardiomyocytes was confirmed by phase and fluorescence microscopy (Figures 2A through 2G). Cardiomyocytes (330 cells/mm2) displayed a morphology typified by small, irregularly-shaped cells, which were poorly attached to the substrate (Figure 2A) and not altered by stimulation of uninfected cells with 100 nmol/L Ang II (Figure 2C) or by infection with AdNHA-AT1 (Figure 2B). However, Ang II stimulation of AdNHA-AT1infected cardiomyocytes resulted in both an increase in cell size (Figure 2D) and hypertrophic phenotype, similar to that observed for PE (Figure 2E) and exemplified by increased organization of sarcomeric units (Figure 2G). These phenotypic changes were blocked by coincubation with the specific AT1 receptor antagonist, candesartan (Figure 2F).
|
Cardiac Fibroblasts Are Not Required for the AT1A-Mediated Cardiomyocyte Hypertrophic Response
Recent studies1215,31 suggest that Ang IIinduced cardiomyocyte hypertrophy is mediated by the release of cardiotrophic factors, including ET-1, from adjacent fibroblasts. Hence, we tested the capacity of the selective ETA receptor antagonist, bosentan, to block Ang IImediated hypertrophic growth in AdNHA-AT1infected cardiomyocyte cultures. Bosentan significantly inhibited ET-1mediated cardiomyocyte hypertrophy, but did not effect Ang IImediated growth (Figure 3). Moreover, purification of the myocytes to greater than 99% purity using percol gradients had no effect on the ability of Ang II to stimulate hypertrophy of neonatal cardiomyocytes infected with 20 PFU/cell AdNHA-AT1 (data not shown). Thus, we conclude that Ang II stimulation of the AT1A receptor, expressed in cardiomyocytes, can directly couple to the hypertrophic growth, independently of the actions of cardiac fibroblasts.
|
Ang II Induces Reexpression of Phenotypic Markers of Cardiac Hypertrophy in AdNHA-AT1Infected Cardiomyocytes
RNase protection analysis (RPA) was used to assess the effect of Ang II on expression of the hypertrophy-induced marker gene ANP (Figures 4A and 4B). In control cardiomyocytes, Ang II did not elevate ANP mRNA levels. In contrast, after infection with AdNHA-AT1, Ang II caused a 5-fold induction of ANP mRNA that was blocked by an AT1 receptor antagonist (Figure 5). Similarly, a robust upregulation of c-fos (960% of control) and c-jun (150% of control) mRNA was observed in cardiomyocyte cultures infected with AdNHA-AT1 but not in uninfected cells after Ang II stimulation (see online data supplement).
|
|
AT1A Couples to Hypertrophic Signaling Through G
q and Ras
Cotransfection of a construct (G
qI) expressing the carboxyl-terminal peptide of the
subunit, G
q, that inhibits G
q25 with the AT1A receptor and an ANP promoter reporter, inhibited the ability of Ang II to activate ANP expression (Figure 5). Similarly, coexpression of a dominant/negative mutant of the small molecular weight GTPase, Ras (N17-Ras), resulted in a significant inhibition of the Ang IImediated ANP response (Figure 5). Thus, the AT1A receptor couples to prototypic markers of hypertrophy via G
q and Ras.
Ang IIMediated Cardiomyocyte Hypertrophy Involves MAPK Activation and Transactivation of the EGFR
Hypertrophy of AdNHA-AT1infected cells in response to Ang II (128.9±2.4% relative to control) could be returned to unstimulated levels by pretreating with the MAPK inhibitor, PD98059 (97.1±5.1%), or the EGFR inhibitor, AG1478 (92.9±5.2%) (Figure 6A). Thus, MAPK signaling, predominantly via the EGFR, is a major mediator of Ang IIinduced cardiomyocyte growth. Growth responses to PE (139.8±13.1%) were partially inhibited by PD98059 (125.9±11.1%) and AG1478 (125.9±12.1%) (data not shown), indicating the specificity of EGFR transactivation and MAPK signaling for Ang IImediated hypertrophic growth. PD98059 and AG1478 did not significantly effect cellular protein levels in unstimulated myocytes (91.7±4.3% and 86.7±7.1%, respectively), suggesting that EGFR transactivation and MAPK signaling does not contribute significantly to the maintenance of basal growth.
|
Ang IImediated hypertrophy was not inhibited by pretreatment with the PKC inhibitor bisindolylmaleimide (BIM) (129.10±4.6%) (Figure 6A). In contrast, hypertrophy induced by PMA (126.7±3.9%), an activator of PKC, was blocked by BIM (104.9±4.6%). Thus, PKC activation is sufficient to initiate cardiomyocyte hypertrophy, but this kinase family does not mediate hypertrophy initiated by Ang II.
To examine whether the AT1A receptor transactivates the EGFR, noninfected and AdNHA-AT1infected cardiomyocytes were stimulated with Ang II and the EGFR was subsequently immunoprecipitated, Western blotted, and probed with anti-phosphotyrosine antibody (Figure 6B). In infected cells, but not uninfected cells, Ang II stimulation promoted tyrosine phosphorylation of the EGFR, confirming transactivation.
Western blotting and quantitative analysis for phosphorylated MAPK42/44 (Figure 6C) revealed that maximal Ang II stimulation of uninfected cardiomyocytes lead to a weak, but consistent, activation of MAPK (1.9-fold control), relative to the strong activation (5.0-fold) with EGF stimulation. MAPK activation in response to EGF was completely inhibited by pretreatment with AG1478 (0.14-fold). In contrast, Ang II stimulation of AdNHA-AT1infected cardiomyocytes lead to a robust activation of MAPK (4.7-fold), similar to that observed with EGF. This activation was significantly inhibited by PD98059 and AG1478 pretreatment (reduced to 1.5-fold and 1.6-fold, respectively), but remained above basal and comparable to the level observed in uninfected cells stimulated by Ang II. Thus, a small proportion of Ang IIinduced MAPK activity is via a MEK1- and EGFR-independent mechanism. Interestingly, the EGFR/MAPK kinase axis appears to be tonically activated to a small degree in unstimulated cells because basal MAPK activation could be completely inhibited by PD98059 or AG1478 (Figure 6C).
PMA-mediated MAPK activation (4.3- and 4.8-fold) was completely abolished by the PKC inhibitor, BIM, (Figure 6D). In contrast, Ang IIstimulated MAPK activity (3.9-fold and 4.3-fold) was only marginally inhibited by PMA (2.9-fold and 3.1-fold) (Figure 6D), supporting the conclusion that the Ang IImediated MAPK/growth axis is largely independent of PKC activation.
Because EGFR transactivation can be Ca2+-sensitive or -insensitive6,32,33 and may involve matrix metalloproteinase(MMP)-dependent liberation of extracellular heparin bound-EGF (HB-EGF) to stimulate EGFR dimerization and autophosphorylation,7 we next investigated the effect of Ca2+ chelation and MMP inhibition on Ang IIstimulated MAPK activation (Figure 6E). Pretreatment with BAPTA-AM (10 µm/L), an intracellular Ca2+ chelator, had no effect on MAPK activation by Ang II. In contrast, pretreatment of cardiomyocytes with a selective MMP inhibitor BB94 (British Biotec), reduced Ang IIdependent MAPK activation by 75% but had no effect on MAPK activity induced by exogenously added EGF (data not shown). Thus, EGFR-dependent MAPK activation by Ang II is via increased MMP activity and subsequent "shedding" of HB-EGF, which appears to Ca2+-independent.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Direct Ang IImediated cardiomyocyte growth has remained controversial because of compelling evidence that factors like ET-1, cytokines, and growth factors, which are released from AT1-expressing cardiac fibroblasts in response to Ang II, can promote growth of adjoining cardiomyocytes.1215,31 Conversely, observations from the present study and others strongly support a significant direct component to Ang IImediated cardiomyocyte growth. First, uninfected cultures did not hypertrophy after Ang II stimulation, suggesting that any contaminating fibroblasts were not capable of marshaling a growth response under these conditions. Second, highly purified cardiomyocyte cultures (less than 0.1% fibroblasts), infected with AdNHA-AT1, displayed robust hypertrophy to Ang II. Third, we found that the ETA receptor antagonist, bosentan, although completely inhibiting the hypertrophic effects of ET-1, had no effect on Ang IImediated growth. This contrasts with evidence supporting a role for ET-1 in Ang IImediated growth.1214 Finally, persuasive in vivo evidence for the direct action of Ang II on cardiomyocyte AT1 receptors has come from transgenic models of cardiomyocyte-specific overexpression of the AT1 receptor.11,34
Although AT1A mRNA can be detected in neonatal cardiomyocyte cultures by sensitive techniques such as RNase protection assay, AT1 receptor expression is very low, as measured by radio-ligand binding assays31 (and this study). Nevertheless, uninfected cardiomyocyte cultures, which fail to exhibit Ang IIinduced hypertrophy, were capable of displaying small increases in MAPK and c-fos expression. This observation confirms that there are low levels of coupled AT1 receptors in these cultures, but that the low-grade MAPK and c-fos responses, detected by highly sensitive/amplified assays, are incapable of mobilizing the full hypertrophic cellular program. Moreover, complete inhibition of the low levels of activated MAPK observed in basal cells did not lead to a concomitant reduction in growth, demonstrating that MAPK activity contributes where MAPK activity must be elevated above a critical level to stimulate hypertrophic pathways.
In our opinion, the paradox of weak signal activation (in the absence of growth to Ang II) has hampered attempts to delineate the bone fide signals that drive Ang IImediated cardiac hypertrophy. Indeed, although previous studies3537 have observed growth-related signals to Ang II in this model, others have not observed hypertrophic growth.13,31 When considered with our finding that AdNHA-AT1infected cardiomyocyte cultures exhibit hypertrophic growth proportional to the level of AT1A receptor expression, we conclude that the density of AT1 receptor in cardiomyocytes and their capacity to transactivate the EGFR and stimulate MAPK activity above a threshold level are the most critical determinants for Ang IIinduced growth. This conclusion supports the hypothesis that upregulation of AT1 receptors in heart muscle cells after cardiac trauma1620 is a major causative factor for the subsequent progression of cardiac hypertrophy. These data are not necessarily in conflict with the concept that Ang II also mediates myocyte growth through paracrine factors from surrounding non-cardiomyocyte cells; rather, the data demonstrate that a direct effect is possible and that most probably both mechanisms exist in vivo.
The sensitivity of MAPK activation and AT1-dependent hypertrophy to AG1478 implicates EGFR transactivation as a major signaling mechanism for Ang IImediated growth. Such transactivation of the EGFR by ligands for GPCRs was first reported by Daub et al38 in rat-1 fibroblasts and subsequently observed in additional cell types and for other GPCR ligands.7 This process, which results in the rapid tyrosine phosphorylation of the EGFR, appears crucial for cellular growth, induction of c-fos transcription, and for activation of the Ras-MAPK pathway by GPCRs. For Ang II, EGFR transactivation was first reported in rat GN4 liver epithelial cells,5 vascular smooth muscle cells,4 and cardiac fibroblasts6 and is important for the activation of MAPK by Ang II. Interestingly, Li et al5 demonstrated that MAPK (ERK1/2) activation could be both Ras-dependent (via EGFR transactivation) or Ras-independent. In agreement, we observed that AG1478 treatment markedly, but not completely, inhibited Ang IImediated ERK1/2 activation. In contrast, AG1478 completely blocked EGF-mediated and basal ERK1/2 phosphorylation. Our interpretation is that the EGFR-mediated component of Ang IIinduced MAPK activation is predominant and crucial for cardiomyocyte growth in response to Ang II.
In addition to MAPK signaling, activation of the PKC family has been linked to GPCR-mediated MAPK signaling and cardiomyocyte hypertrophy.2,37,39 However, in the current experiments, a PKC inhibitor had no effect on Ang IIstimulated hypertrophy and only marginally reduced EGFR-dependent MAPK activity in myocytes infected with AdNHA-AT1. Thus, our results indicate that although activation of PKC by PMA is sufficient to promote cardiac growth, PKC does not contribute to cardiomyocyte hypertrophy and MAPK signaling induced by Ang IImediated transactivation of the EGFR. This finding is in agreement with previous studies, which demonstrated that Ang IIinduced EGFR transactivation in smooth muscle cells occurred via a PKC-independent mechanism.4,5
The mechanism of EGFR transactivation is unclear and probably depends on the cell type and the environment.7 For Ang II, it may involve the activation of an intracellular Ca2+-sensitive proline-rich tyrosine kinase, termed Pyk2,33,40 in conjunction with Src-kinases, or it may be Ca2+-independent.32,33 Alternatively, EGFR transactivation may result from a so-called "triple membrane-passing signal mechanism"7 in which GPCR stimulation induces the proteolytic processing of an extracellular proheparin-binding-EGF (proHB-EGF) that liberates free HB-EGF to stimulate EGFR dimerization and autophosphorylation. The latter mechanism has been reported for Ang IImediated EGFR transactivation in vascular smooth muscle41 and cardiac endothelial cells.42 In the present study, pretreatment of cardiomyocytes with the MMP inhibitor, BB94, reduced Ang IIinduced MAPK activation, indicating that a significant component of Ang IIEGFRdependent MAPK activation is mediated by increased MMP activity, presumably via shedding of HB-EGF. Treatment of cardiomyocytes with the intracellular inhibitor of Ca2+, BAPTA-AM, did not block Ang IImediated MAPK activation, implying a Ca2+-independent EGFR transactivation in these cells.
In summary, we have quantitatively transferred AT1A receptors into neonatal cardiomyocytes to determine the molecular mechanisms by which Ang II regulates cardiac hypertrophic growth. These receptors functionally couple Ang II stimulation to cellular signals and phenotypic/genotypic processes that are the hallmarks of cardiac hypertrophy and have allowed for the first time the identification of an essential contribution of EGFR transactivation and MAPK signaling to this process.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received July 6, 2001; revision received December 10, 2001; accepted December 10, 2001.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
12. J Biol Chem. 1997; 272: 2882928832.
1-adrenergic receptor signaling in cardiac cells. Embo J. 1993; 12: 51315139.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
1A-adrenergic receptors in neonatal cardiac myocytes is sufficient to cause hypertrophy and differential regulation of
1-adrenergic receptor subtype mRNAs. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1998; 30: 15151523.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
V. Rajagopalan, I. H. Zucker, J. A. Jones, M. Carlson, and Y. J. Ma Cardiac ErbB-1/ErbB-2 mutant expression in young adult mice leads to cardiac dysfunction Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 2008; 295(2): H543 - H554. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Lei, S. Mason, D. Liu, Y. Huang, C. Marks, R. Hickey, I. S. Jovin, M. Pypaert, R. S. Johnson, and F. J. Giordano Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-Dependent Degeneration, Failure, and Malignant Transformation of the Heart in the Absence of the von Hippel-Lindau Protein Mol. Cell. Biol., June 1, 2008; 28(11): 3790 - 3803. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. R. Kompa, F. See, D. A. Lewis, A. Adrahtas, D. M. Cantwell, B. H. Wang, and H. Krum Long-Term but Not Short-Term p38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Inhibition Improves Cardiac Function and Reduces Cardiac Remodeling Post-Myocardial Infarction J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 2008; 325(3): 741 - 750. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Phrommintikul, L. Tran, A. Kompa, B. Wang, A. Adrahtas, D. Cantwell, D. J. Kelly, and H. Krum Effects of a Rho kinase inhibitor on pressure overload induced cardiac hypertrophy and associated diastolic dysfunction Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, April 1, 2008; 294(4): H1804 - H1814. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. A. Woodcock, X.-J. Du, M. E. Reichelt, and R. M. Graham Cardiac {alpha}1-adrenergic drive in pathological remodelling Cardiovasc Res, February 1, 2008; 77(3): 452 - 462. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-C. Lauzier, E. L. Page, M. D. Michaud, and D. E. Richard Differential Regulation of Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1 through Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Transactivation in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells Endocrinology, August 1, 2007; 148(8): 4023 - 4031. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. P. Singh, B. Le, V. B. Bhat, K. M. Baker, and R. Kumar High-glucose-induced regulation of intracellular ANG II synthesis and nuclear redistribution in cardiac myocytes Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 2007; 293(2): H939 - H948. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Grossmann, A. W. Krug, R. Freudinger, S. Mildenberger, K. Voelker, and M. Gekle Aldosterone-induced EGFR expression: interaction between the human mineralocorticoid receptor and the human EGFR promoter Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, June 1, 2007; 292(6): E1790 - E1800. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. L. Reudelhuber, K. E. Bernstein, and P. Delafontaine Is Angiotensin II a Direct Mediator of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy?: Time for Another Look Hypertension, June 1, 2007; 49(6): 1196 - 1201. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Ohtsu, P. J. Dempsey, G. D. Frank, E. Brailoiu, S. Higuchi, H. Suzuki, H. Nakashima, K. Eguchi, and S. Eguchi ADAM17 Mediates Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Transactivation and Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell Hypertrophy Induced by Angiotensin II Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., September 1, 2006; 26(9): e133 - e137. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Zhai, J. Galeotti, J. Liu, E. Holle, X. Yu, T. Wagner, and J. Sadoshima An Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Mutant Lacking Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Transactivation Does Not Induce Angiotensin II-Mediated Cardiac Hypertrophy Circ. Res., September 1, 2006; 99(5): 528 - 536. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. J. Smith and L. M. Luttrell Signal Switching, Crosstalk, and Arrestin Scaffolds: Novel G Protein-Coupled Receptor Signaling in Cardiovascular Disease Hypertension, August 1, 2006; 48(2): 173 - 179. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||