Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation Research
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation Research. 2002;90:e5-e10
Published online before print December 13, 2001, doi: 10.1161/hh0102.103611
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
90/1/e5    most recent
hh0102.103611v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dono, R.
Right arrow Articles by Ehmke, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dono, R.
Right arrow Articles by Ehmke, H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Developmental biology
Right arrow Genetically altered mice
Right arrow Autonomic, reflex, and neurohumoral control of circulation
(Circulation Research. 2002;90:e5.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.


UltraRapid Communications

FGF2 Signaling Is Required for the Development of Neuronal Circuits Regulating Blood Pressure

Rosanna Dono*, Jörg Faulhaber*, Antonella Galli, Aimée Zuniga, Tilmann Volk, Gemma Texido, Rolf Zeller, Heimo Ehmke

From the Department of Developmental Biology (R.D., A.G., A.Z., R.Z.), Faculty of Biology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Institut für Physiologie (J.F., T.V., H.E.), Universität Hamburg, Martinistraße 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany; and European Molecular Biology Laboratories (G.T.), Heidelberg, Germany. Present address for G.T. is the Department of Pharmacology, Pharmacia and Upjohn, Nerviano, Italy.

Correspondence and request for material to Prof Dr H. Ehmke, Institut für Physiologie, Universität Hamburg, Martinistraße 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany. E-mail ehmke{at}uke.uni-hamburg.de; or Dr Rosanna Dono, Dept of Developmental Biology, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, NL-3584CH Utrecht, The Netherlands. E-mail r.dono@bio.uu.nl

Abstract

Fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2) signaling is involved in angiogenesis, vascular contractility, and cardiac hypertrophy. Mice lacking a functional FGF2 gene (FGF2-/-) are hypotensive, but the primary physiological role of FGF2 in cardiovascular homeostasis remained unknown. Using a chicken FGF2 (cFGF2) transgene under control of the Wnt-1 promotor, we selectively re-expressed FGF2 in the developing nervous system of FGF2-/- (transgenic FGF2 mutant) embryos. Expression of the cFGF2 transgene in the developing nervous system, including its autonomic region, was limited to the period between embryonic day 9.5 and 14.5. Significantly, no FGF2 re-expression was detected in developing heart and blood vessels. Pharmacological analysis revealed a normalization of the blood pressure response to isoproterenol-induced vasodilation in adult transgenic FGF2 mutant mice. In addition, the hypotensive phenotype was rescued in 1 line (of 2) transgenic FGF2 mutant adult mice having expressed higher levels of cFGF2 proteins during nervous system development. These genetic studies indicate that FGF2 signaling is essential for complete development of the neural circuitry required for central regulation of blood pressure, whereas it appears dispensable for blood pressure control in the healthy adult. The full text of this article is available at http://www.circresaha.org.


Key Words: blood pressure • fibroblast growth factor-2 • hypotension • mouse • transgenic

Fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF2) is a signaling molecule with important functions for growth and differentiation, particularly in the central nervous system (CNS). From neurulation onwards, FGF2 is expressed at high levels in the CNS,1 and mice lacking a functional FGF2 gene show distinct defects in the developing cerebral cortex and adult spinal cord.24

Several observations indicate that FGF2 is also involved in cardiovascular homeostasis. In the adult, FGF2 is expressed in smooth muscle and endothelial cells.5 Infusion of FGF2 causes vasodilation and hypotension in rats, dogs, and humans69 via opening of ATP-sensitive K+ channels and enhanced release of nitric oxide.6 Endogenous release of FGF2 from vascular smooth muscle cells is triggered by an increase in mechanical strain above normal levels,10 possibly causing transient elevations in cell membrane permeability.11 Together these studies suggest that FGF2 functions in an antihypertensive vasodilator cascade.

Surprisingly, targeted inactivation of the FGF2 gene (FGF2-/-) in mice leads to chronically decreased blood pressure levels in adults.2,12 FGF2-/- mice display a markedly attenuated myocardial growth response to mechanical overload,13 raising the possibility that impaired left ventricular function may contribute to the hypotension. Furthermore, the spontaneous contractile activity of isolated portal veins from FGF2-/- mice is reduced.12 This may cause alterations in blood volume distribution and cardiac filling pressure. In addition, if this defect affects directly the contractile apparatus, it may also affect arterial resistance vessels. Finally, the neural control of blood pressure is impaired in FGF2-/- mice.2 However, the relative importance and possible contributions of these various deficits to the observed hypotensive phenotype was unclear. Accordingly, the primary physiological role of FGF2 in blood pressure homeostasis has remained obscure.

During CNS development, FGF2 is expressed by progenitor cells of neuronal circuits involved in the central regulation of blood pressure, for example in the myelencephalon2 and the intermediolateral neurons in the spinal cord.14 Furthermore, FGF2 is also expressed by migrating trunk neural crest cells,15 which give rise to peripheral cardiovascular nerves. This strongly suggests an essential role of FGF2 during the normal development of cardiovascular reflex control. If the hypotensive phenotype of FGF2-/- mice were indeed primarily caused by a congenital malformation of neuronal circuits regulating blood pressure,2 then restricted re-expression of FGF2 during nervous system development should rescue the defects in cardiovascular homeostasis in adult mice. To directly test this hypothesis, we used a chicken FGF2 (cFGF2) transgene under the control of the Wnt-1 promoter16,17 to target FGF2 re-expression specifically to the developing nervous system in FGF2 mutant embryos.

Materials and Methods

Transgenic Mice
The generation of transgenic mouse lines expressing the 3 cFGF2 protein isoforms1 in the dorsal aspect of the neural tube has been described previously.16 Two transgenic lines expressing the transgene appropriately in the embryos (TgA and TgC; see reference 16) were used for all experiments in the present study. The transgenic mice were crossed to FGF2-/- mice2 to generate adult mice and embryos of all genotypes. All control and mutant mice were littermates of a mixed C57BL/6Jx129/Sv genetic background. Mice and embryos carrying the FGF2 loss-of-function allele and/or the cFGF2 transgene were genotyped by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis of tail biopsies or embryonic yolk sac DNA using specific PCR primers.

In Situ Hybridization and Antibody Staining
Expression of the cFGF2 transgene was determined using digoxigenin-labeled riboprobe complementary to coding exon 2/3 of the chicken FGF2 gene.16 This probe does not detect endogenous mouse FGF2 transcripts. Embryos and embryonic CNS were dissected into PBS, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, and processed for whole-mount in situ hybridization. Alternatively, embryos were embedded in paraffin and 10-µm transverse sections were processed for RNA in situ hybridization.2 Parallel sections were processed for immunohistochemistry. Ectopic cFGF2 proteins were detected using affinity purified FGF2 antibodies.1 Endogenous mouse FGF2 proteins were not detected under the conditions used.

Immunoblot Analysis
Embryonic brains and spinal cords were dissected in PBS and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen. Normalized protein extracts were prepared and analyzed as previously described.1 Samples were further normalized for protein content using monoclonal ß-tubulin antibodies (Sigma 1:2000).

Cardiovascular Studies
All cardiovascular studies were performed in awake, unrestrained female mice (body weight 21 to 42 grams; age 5 to 10 months) in accordance with national guidelines for the care and use of research animals. Animals were anesthetized with ketamine (100 µg per g body weight IP) and xylazine-HCL (4 µg per gram body weight IP). Chronic catheters were implanted in the left femoral artery and vein under aseptic conditions as described previously.18,19 Blood pressure was measured in the abdominal aorta via the femoral artery catheter (transducer PRC-21K, amplifier MIO-0501, Föhr Medical Instruments) and continuously recorded at 500 Hz (80586, DAS-0216, Keithley-Metrabyte; LabTech Notebook pro 10.2.1, Labtech). Drugs were infused via the femoral vein catheter by using a calibrated pump (Precidor 5003, Infors AG). Baseline values of arterial blood pressure and heart rate were determined for 1 hour in each mouse in its own cage on day 2 or day 3 (ie, 48 to 72 hours) after surgery. To test the cardiovascular response to an acute hypotensive stimulus, on day 1 (ie, >24 hours) after surgery the ß12-adrenoceptor agonist isoproterenol (Sigma) was infused after a control period of 5 minutes at increasing doses (0.05, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.4 ng/min per gram body weight). Isoproterenol does not cross the blood-brain barrier, and therefore, has no direct effects on the central nervous system.20 Before each dose of isoproterenol, a baseline recording of 5 minutes was performed. Isoproterenol was infused at a constant rate for 3 minutes. Blood pressure and heart rate responses were averaged over each infusion period. Between each dose of isoproterenol, mice were allowed to recover until blood pressure and heart rate returned to their baseline levels over the entire experimental period.

Statistical Analysis
Values are expressed as mean±SEM. Statistical comparisons were made by 1-way ANOVA (1-hour baseline recordings) or 2-way ANOVA (infusion studies) followed by the Bonferroni’s Multiple Comparison test. An error level of P<0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Temporal and Spatial Expression of the cFGF2 Transgene
Chicken FGF2 (cFGF2) is functionally conserved to its mouse counterpart, and its ectopic expression does not alter morphology of the wild-type CNS.16 In the dorsal spinal cord and developing autonomic nervous system, the transgene distribution overlaps with that of endogenous FGF2 (Figure 1; compare to reference 2).14 Therefore, two independent cFGF2 transgenic lines (called TgA and TgC; see reference 16) were intercrossed to FGF2-/- mice2 to generate compound transgenic FGF2 mutant embryos and adult mice (FGF2-/-; TgA and FGF2-/-; TgC) for developmental and physiological analysis.



View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Expression of the cFGF2 transgene is restricted to the developing nervous system. A, cFGF2 transgene distribution in FGF2 mutant mouse embryos carrying transgene C (FGF2-/-; TgC) during embryonic day 9.5. Note dorsal cFGF2 expression in the diencephalon (Di), mesencephalon (Ms), myelencephalon (My), and spinal cord (SC). The transgene is also expressed at the mesencephalic/metencephalic junction and in neural crest derivatives located in the trunk (arrow). No expression is detected in the metencephalon (Mt) and telencephalon (Te). B, Distribution of the cFGF2 transcripts in the spinal cord during embryonic day 12.5. Transverse section (10 µm) showing the transcript distribution in a FGF2+/-; TgA spinal cord. The section is located at the level of the forelimb. Highest expression is detected in the dorsal aspect of the spinal cord.17 Note the second expression domain in ventral part of the spinal cord (arrow). ML indicates mantle layer; MN, motor neurons. C, Distribution of the cFGF2 proteins as detected by immunohistochemistry in a section adjacent to the one shown in B. Note that the cFGF2 proteins are more widespread than cFGF2 transcripts. Ectopic cFGF2 proteins are also detected in the intermediolateral region of the spinal cord (indicated by brackets) and ventral spinal cord regions (arrow). D, Brain of an FGF2-/-; TgC mouse embryo (embryonic day 16.5). Note the downregulation in mesencephalon (Ms; arrowhead) and low expression in the roof of the ependymal diverticulum of the fourth ventricle (open arrowhead) and upregulation in the developing cerebellum (Cb; arrow). CH indicates cerebral hemisphere; My, myelencephalon. E, Transverse section (10 µm) to show cFGF2 transcript distributions in an FGF2+/-; TgC spinal cord during embryonic day 16.5. The section is at the level of the forelimb. Note the restricted expression in the ependymal layer (arrow). F, Distribution of cFGF2 proteins in a section adjacent to the one shown in E. cFGF2 proteins are now restricted to the ependymal layer (arrow) and no longer expressed in the intermediolateral region (indicated by brackets). DH indicates dorsal gray horn; VH, ventral gray horn. G Top, Immunoblot analysis of total proteins prepared from brain and spinal cords of mouse embryos (embryonic day 12.5) using FGF2 antibodies. All 3 cFGF2 protein isoforms are translated in transgenic mouse embryos. Lane 1: nontransgenic control embryos (10 µL of total extract loaded); lane 2 and 4: FGF2-/-; TgA (5 µL and 2.5 µL loaded, respectively); lane 3 and 5: FGF2-/-; TgC (5 µL and 2.5 µL loaded, respectively). Note that transgenic embryos of line C (lanes 3,5) express at least 2-fold higher levels of cFGF2 protein than line A (lanes 2, 4). G Bottom, Immunoblot analysis of the same protein extracts using ß-tubulin antibodies.

The temporal and spatial distribution of the cFGF2 transgene was analyzed in transgenic FGF2 mutant (FGF2-/-; Tg) and wild-type littermate embryos (FGF2+/+; Tg and/or FGF2-/+; Tg) using cFGF2 specific probes and antibodies (Figure 1). cFGF2 transcript and protein distributions were identical for both transgenic lines (TgA, TgC) in wild-type and FGF2 mutant embryos (Figure 1 and data not shown). The cFGF2 transgene was expressed in the developing CNS from early neural fold stages onwards (data not shown; see also reference 17). By embryonic day 9.5, the cFGF2 transgene was abundantly expressed in the CNS and at lower levels in developing sympathetic ganglia (arrow, Figure 1A). In the CNS, the cFGF2 transgene was expressed mainly by the dorsal diencephalon, midbrain, myelencephalon, and spinal cord, although no expression was detected in the telencephalon (Figure 1A). Most relevant to the purpose of this study, the cFGF2 transgene was not expressed by the developing heart and blood vessels (embryonic day 9.5 to 16.5; see Figure 1A). From embryonic day 9.5 to 14.5, the cFGF2 transgene expression pattern remained the same in the CNS, whereas it was lost from differentiating sympathetic ganglia (data not shown).

During embryonic day 11, immature neurons of the developing autonomic nervous system separate from the ventral pool of motor neurons and migrate to the intermediate spinal cord layers,21 where they undergo terminal differentiation.22 The intermediolateral neurons of the thoracic spinal cord are a major component of the developing autonomic nervous system.22 Therefore, the cellular distribution of the cFGF2 transgene was determined in transverse sections of thoracic spinal cords at embryonic day 12.5 (Figures 1B and 1C). Highest levels of cFGF2 transcripts were detected in the dorsal aspect of the neural tube (Figure 1B) and a ventral region bordering motor neurons (arrow, Figure 1B). Using more sensitive immunohistochemistry, cFGF2 proteins were detected in broader areas than transcripts in both dorsal and ventral spinal cord regions (compare Figure 1B to 1C). In particular, cFGF2 proteins were detected in the intermediate part of the spinal cord during differentiation of autonomic neurons (bracketed region, Figure 1C). This pattern is specific for cFGF2 proteins as no signal was detected in nontransgenic littermates (data not shown).

During later developmental stages, expression of the cFGF2 transgene is progressively downregulated. By embryonic day 16.5, expression in the brain was limited to the developing cerebellum (Figure 1D). In the spinal cord, both cFGF2 transcripts and proteins were restricted to the ependymal layer (Figures 1E and 1F). Interestingly, expression was no longer detected in regions containing differentiating autonomic neurons (indicated by brackets, Figure 1F). This significant decrease of cFGF2 transgene expression was confirmed by semiquantitative reverse transcriptase–PCR (data not shown). Finally, immunoblot analysis of normalized protein extracts prepared from dissected CNS (embryonic day 12.5) showed that all 3 cFGF2 protein isoforms1 are expressed (Figure 1G). It is important to note that cFGF2 protein levels were at least 2-fold higher in embryos carrying TgC (Figure 1G, lanes 3 and 5) than TgA (Figure 1G, lanes 2 and 4). In summary, these studies establish that expression of the cFGF2 transgene in the developing autonomic nervous system within the CNS is limited from embryonic day 9.5 to about 14.5. The transgene was never expressed outside the developing nervous system (Figure 1; see also references 16 and 17).

Rescue of Blood Pressure Regulation by the cFGF2 Transgene
The results shown in Figure 1 indicate that the cFGF2 transgenic lines are suited to determine whether re-expression of FGF2 in the developing nervous system of FGF2-/- embryos rescues the defects in blood pressure regulation. Adult FGF2-/- mice fail to compensate a hypotensive challenge induced by intravenous infusion of the ß12-adrenoceptor agonist isoproterenol.2 Therefore, the effects of increasing doses of isoproterenol on mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate were comparatively analyzed in conscious, adult mice of all genotypes (Figure 2 and Table). Over the entire concentration range, FGF2-/- mice displayed significantly lower blood pressures than their wild-type littermates (Figure 2A). In contrast, FGF2 mutant mice carrying transgene C (FGF2-/-; TgC) or A (FGF2-/-; TgA), respectively, responded normally to increasing doses of isoproterenol (Figures 2B and 2C). This can best be seen by comparing the dose-response curves of transgenic FGF2 mutant mice to those of their wild-type (FGF2+/+) and transgenic wild-type (FGF2+/+; TgC and FGF2+/+; TgA; see Figures 2B and 2C) littermates. Heart rates were not different between FGF2 mutant mice (FGF2-/-, FGF2-/-; TgA, and FGF2-/-; TgC) and their corresponding wild-type controls (FGF2+/+, FGF2+/+; TgA and FGF2+/+; TgC; see Table). These results indicate that cardiovascular reflex control of blood pressure is normalized in adult FGF2 mutant mice, which as embryos expressed the cFGF2 transgene specifically in their developing nervous system (Figure 1).



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Rescue of the autonomic dysfunction in transgenic, FGF2 mutant mice. A, Effects of increasing doses of isoproterenol on the mean arterial blood pressure in wild-type and FGF2-/- mice. Isoproterenol infusion at 0.05 ng/min per gram body weight already induced a larger decrease in mean arterial blood pressure in FGF2-/- than in wild-type mice. Note that increasing doses of isoproterenol caused a progressive decrease of mean arterial blood pressure in wild-type mice. However, FGF2-/- mice always showed a significantly greater reduction in blood pressure than wild-type controls (P<0.001). B, Effects of increasing doses of isoproterenol on mean arterial blood pressure in FGF2 mutant mice carrying transgene C (FGF2-/-; TgC) and wild-type controls (FGF2+/+ and FGF2+/+; TgC). No significant differences in response to isoproterenol infusion were detected between the 3 genotypes. C, Effects of increasing doses of isoproterenol on mean arterial blood pressure in FGF2 mutant mice carrying transgene A (FGF2-/-; TgA) and wild-type controls (FGF2+/+ and FGF2+/+; TgA). No significant differences in response to isoproterenol infusion were detected between the 3 genotypes. Data for wild-type mice (FGF2+/+) are identical in all 3 panels. All data are mean±SEM. n indicates number of mice. *P<0.05, ***P<0.001 vs wild-type by two-way ANOVA over all genotypes followed by Bonferroni’s Multiple Comparison test.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Baseline Heart Rates and Heart Rate Responses to Isoproterenol

Potential rescue of the hypotensive phenotype in FGF2 mutant mice (Figure 3A; see reference 2)12 carrying either transgene was assessed by determining the mean arterial blood pressure in conscious, unrestrained adult mice over prolonged recording periods. Indeed, FGF2 mutant mice carrying transgene C (FGF2-/-; TgC) displayed normal blood pressure levels (Figure 3B), whereas FGF2 mutant mice carrying transgene A (FGF2-/-; TgA) remained hypotensive (Figure 3C; compare to Figure 3A). Interestingly, baseline heart rates did not differ between the genotypes (Table). The differential rescue of blood pressure may result from a lower level of cFGF2 protein expression in transgenic embryos of line A (Figure 1G), which is probably because of differences in transgene copy numbers and/or integration site. These results indicate that higher levels of FGF2 proteins are required to rescue the hypotensive phenotype in addition to cardiovascular reflex control.



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Analysis of resting mean arterial blood pressure in transgenic, FGF2 mutant mice. A, Resting mean arterial blood pressure in wild-type and FGF2-/- mice. FGF2-/- mice always displayed lower blood pressures than their wild-type littermates (97±2 vs 110±2 mm Hg; P<0.001). B, Resting mean arterial blood pressure in FGF2 mutant mice carrying transgene C (FGF2-/-; TgC) and wild-type transgenic controls (FGF2+/+; TgC). Blood pressure levels were nearly identical in both groups (105±2 vs 107±2 mm Hg; P=NS). C, Resting mean arterial blood pressure in FGF2 mutant mice carrying transgene A (FGF2-/-; TgA) and wild-type transgenic controls (FGF2+/+; TgA). Despite the fact that response to isoproterenol induced vasodilation was normal in FGF2 mutant mice carrying transgene A (Figure 2C), they displayed a significantly lower blood pressure than their wild-type transgenic littermates (96±2 vs 108±2 mm Hg; P<0.001). All data are mean±SEM. n indicates number of mice. ***P<0.001 vs corresponding wild-type control by 1-way ANOVA over all genotypes followed by Bonferroni’s Multiple Comparison test.

Discussion

Although physiological, pharmacological, and genetic studies have demonstrated that FGF2 fulfills important functions in cardiovascular homeostasis, its primary role in blood pressure regulation has remained elusive. We now show that FGF2 signaling in the developing nervous system, but not in vascular smooth muscle cells or cardiac myocytes, is required to establish normal blood pressure control mechanisms.

In particular, these findings indicate that FGF2 signaling is essential for normal development of the neuronal regulatory circuits involved in central regulation of blood pressure. An essential role during embryonic development is in agreement with the observed high expression of FGF2 during development of the autonomic nervous system in embryos.2,14,15 However, the specific target cells of FGF2 signaling in these determinative processes remain to be identified. Interestingly, neither baseline heart rates nor heart rate responses to isoproterenol were affected in FGF2 mutant mice and their wild-type littermates. This argues against the cardiovascular phenotype of FGF2-/- mice being caused by a major defect in regulation of heart rates. Because the slopes of the blood pressure response to isoproterenol are similar in all genotypes, an impairment of the afferent limbs of the baroreceptor reflex seems also unlikely. Rather, the physiological results would be compatible with a dysfunction of preganglionic intermediolateral neurons in the spinal cord. These neurons relay the central sympathetic outflow to the target organs. Their degeneration reduces baseline sympathetic tone and excitatory sympathetic reflexes and is associated with impaired baroreceptor reflex function and hypotension.23 However, the differential rescue of cardiovascular response to isoproterenol and baseline blood pressure in FGF2 mutant mice carrying transgene A (FGF2-/-; TgA) and transgene C (FGF2-/-; TgC) suggests that spinal and supraspinal mechanisms are potentially differentially affected in FGF2-/- mice.

Because FGF2 mutant mice carrying the transgene do not express FGF2 outside the nervous system, it is unlikely that FGF2 signaling in the peripheral cardiovascular system participates in maintaining blood pressure above hypotensive levels in the healthy adult. This does not exclude that FGF2 may serve important functions under pathophysiological conditions. For example, cardiomyocytes release FGF2 on elevated mechanical load,24 and FGF2 mutant mice display severely reduced hypertrophic myocardial growth in response to pressure overload.13 These studies suggest an important role of FGF2 signaling during cardiac hypertrophy. Furthermore, we showed previously2 that FGF2-/- adult mice respond to continuous infusion of angiotensin II (over 6 days) with an exaggerated increase in blood pressure. This observation supports the notion that FGF2 released from smooth muscle cells and/or endothelial cells on elevated mechanical stress may exert substantial vasodilator effects under patho-physiological conditions.

Interestingly, only FGF2 mutant mice expressing higher levels of the cFGF2 transgene (FGF2-/-; TgC) displayed normal baseline blood pressure levels. These data indicate that the hypotensive phenotype of FGF2-/- mice is not per se linked to the dysfunction of cardiovascular reflex control. This observation corroborates the proposal that short- and long-term blood pressure regulation depend on different neural reflex mechanisms.25,26 Further comparative physiological analysis of both transgenic FGF2 mutant mouse strains may help to further dissect these pathways. More importantly, the present study demonstrates that neural control mechanisms are an essential component of long-term blood pressure regulation. The identification of the precise nature of this FGF2-dependent pathway will greatly enhance our understanding of the interplay between neural, vascular, and renal mechanisms in controlling blood pressure.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Thyssen Foundation (to H.E. and R.Z.). This work was initiated and partially performed at European Molecular Biology Laboratories (EMBL) (R.D., A.Z., R.Z) and the University of Heidelberg (J.F., T.V., H.E.). The authors are indebted to L. Perez for help in establishing the mouse colony at EMBL.

Footnotes

*Both authors contributed equally to this study. Back

Received October 5, 2001; revision received November 13, 2001; accepted December 3, 2001.

References

1. Dono R, Zeller R, Cell-type–specific nuclear translocation of fibroblast growth factor-2 isoforms during chicken kidney and limb morphogenesis. Dev Biol. 1994; 163: 316–330.

2. Dono R, Texido G, Dussel R, Ehmke H, Zeller R. Impaired cerebral cortex development and blood pressure regulation in FGF-2–deficient mice. EMBO J. 1998; 17: 4213–4225.

3. Ortega S, Ittmann M, Tsang SH, Ehrlich M, Basilico C. Neuronal defects and delayed wound healing in mice lacking fibroblast growth factor 2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998; 95: 5672–5677.

4. Vaccarino FM, Schwartz ML, Raballo R, Nilsen J, Rhee J, Zhou M, Doetschman T, Coffin JD, Wyland JJ, Hung YT. Changes in cerebral cortex size are governed by fibroblast growth factor during embryogenesis. Nat Neurosci. 1999; 2: 246–253.

5. Lindner V, Reidy MA. Expression of basic fibroblast growth factor and its receptor by smooth muscle cells and endothelium in injured rat arteries. Circ Res. 1993; 73: 589–595.

6. Cuevas P, Carceller F, Ortegsa S, M. Z, Nieto I, Gimenez-Gallego G. Hypotensive activity of fibroblast growth factor. Science. 1991; 254: 1208–1210.

7. Lazarous DF, Scheinowitz M, Shou M, Hodge E, Rajanayagam SMAHS, Robison G, Stiber JA, Correa R, Epstein SE, Unger EF. Effects of chronic systemic administration of basic fibroblast growth factor on collateral development in the canine heart. Circulation. 1995; 91: 145–153.

8. Lazarous DF, Unger EF, Epstein SE, Stine A, Arevalo JL, Chew EY, Quyyumi AA. Basic fibroblast growth factor in patients with intermittent claudication: results of a phase I trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 36: 1239–1244.

9. Unger EF, Goncalves L, Epstein SE, Chew EY, Trapnell CB, Cannon RO3rd, Quyyumi AA. Effects of a single intracoronary injection of basic fibroblast growth factor in stable angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol. 2000; 85: 1414–1419.

10. Cheng GC, Briggs WH, Gerson DS, Libby P, Grodzinsky AJ, Gray ML, Lee RT. Mechanical strain tightly controls fibroblast growth factor-2 release from cultured human vascular smooth muscle cells. Circ Res. 1997; 80: 28–36.

11. Kaye D, Pimental D, Prasad S, Mäki T, Berger H-J, McNeil PL, Smith TW, Kelly RA. Role of transiently altered sarcolemmal membrane permeability and basic fibroblast growth factor release in the hypertrophic response of adult rat ventricular myocytes to increased mechanical activity J Clin Invest. 1996; 97: 281–291.

12. Zhou M, Sutliff RL, Paul RJ, Lorenz JN, Hoying JB, Haudenschild CC, Yin M, Coffin JD, Kong L, Krenias EG, Luo W, Boivin GP, Duffy JJ, Pawlowski SA, Doetschman T. Fibroblast growth factor 2 control of vascular tone. Nat Med. 1998; 4: 201–207.

13. Schultz JE, Witt SA, Nieman ML, Reiser PJ, Engle SJ, Zhou M, Pawlowski SA, Lorenz JN, Kimball TR, Doetschman T. Fibroblast growth factor-2 mediates pressure-induced hypertrophic response. J Clin Invest. 1999; 104: 709–719.

14. Stapf C, Lück G, Shakibaei M, Blottner D. Fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2) and FGF-receptor (FGFR-1) immunoreactivity in embryonic autonomic neurons. Cell Tissue Res. 1997; 287: 471–480.

15. Savage MP, Hart CE, Riley BB, Sasse J, Olwin BB, Faon JF. Distribution of FGF-2 suggests it has a role in chick limb bud growth. Dev Dyn. 1993; 198: 159–170.

16. Zuniga Mejia Borja A, Murphy C, Zeller R. alt FGF-2, a novel ER-associated FGF-2 protein isoform: its embryonic distribution and functional analysis during neural tube development. Dev Biol. 1996; 180: 680–692.

17. Echelard Y, Vassileva G, McMahon AP. Cis-acting regulatory sequences governing Wnt-1 expression in the developing mouse CNS. Development. 1994; 120: 2213–2224.

18. Just A, Faulhaber J, Ehmke H. Autonomic cardiovascular control in conscious mice. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2000; 279: R2214–R2221.

19. Plüger S, Faulhaber J, Fürstenau M, Löhn M, Waldschütz R, Gollasch M, Haller H, Luft FC, Ehmke H, Pongs O. Mice with disrupted BK channel ß1 subunit gene feature abnormal Ca2+ Spark/STOC coupling and elevated blood pressure. Circ Res. 2000; 87: e53–e60.

20. Hoffman BB, Lefkowitz RJ. Catecholamines, sympathomimetic drugs, and adrenergic receptor antagonists.In: Hardman JG, Lin Y, eds. The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. 9th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2001: 199–248.

21. Yip JW, Yip YP, Nakajima K, Capriotti C. Reelin controls position of autonomic neurons in the spinal cord. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000; 97: 8612–8616.

22. Phelps PE, Barber RP, Vaughn JE. Embryonic development of choline acetyltransferase in thoracic spinal motor neurons: somatic and autonomic neurons may be derived from a common cellular group. J Comp Neurol. 1991; 307: 77–86.

23. Bannister R, Mathias CJ. Autonomic Failure: A Textbook of Clinical Disorders of the Autonomic Nervous System. 3rd ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1992: 531–547.

24. Clarke MSF, Caldwell RW, Chiao H, Miyake K, McNeil PL. Contraction-induced cell wounding, and release of fibroblast growth factor in heart. Circ Res. 1995; 76: 927–934.

25. Brooks VL, Osborn JW. Hormonal-sympathetic interactions in long-term regulation of arterial pressure: an hypothesis. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 1995; 268: R1343–R1358.

26. DiBona GF. Neural control of the kidney: functionally specific renal sympathetic nerve fibers. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2000; 279: R1517–R1524.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
H. Ehmke
Mouse gene targeting in cardiovascular physiology
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, January 1, 2003; 284(1): R28 - R30.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
90/1/e5    most recent
hh0102.103611v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dono, R.
Right arrow Articles by Ehmke, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dono, R.
Right arrow Articles by Ehmke, H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Developmental biology
Right arrow Genetically altered mice
Right arrow Autonomic, reflex, and neurohumoral control of circulation