This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Data Supplement All Versions of this Article: 89/8/670    most recent hh2001.097867v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lowe, H. C. Articles by Khachigian, L. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lowe, H. C. Articles by Khachigian, L. M. Related Collections Restenosis Smooth muscle proliferation and differentiation

(Circulation Research. 2001;89:670.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.

Molecular Medicine

Catalytic Oligodeoxynucleotides Define a Key Regulatory Role for Early Growth Response Factor-1 in the Porcine Model of Coronary In-Stent Restenosis

Harry C. Lowe, Roger G. Fahmy, Mary M. Kavurma, Andrew Baker, Colin N. Chesterman, Levon M. Khachigian

From the Centre for Thrombosis and Vascular Research, University of New South Wales and Prince of Wales Hospital (H.C.L., R.G.F., M.M.K., C.N.C., L.M.K.) and Johnson and Johnson Research Pty. Limited (A.B.), Sydney, Australia.

Correspondence to Levon M. Khachigian, PhD, Centre for Thrombosis and Vascular Research, School of Pathology, The University of New South Wales, Sydney NSW 2052, Australia. E-mail L.Khachigian{at}unsw.edu.au

	Abstract

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Abstract—— Early growth response factor-1 (Egr-1) controls the expression of a growing number of genes involved in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and postangioplasty restenosis. Egr-1 is activated by diverse proatherogenic stimuli. As such, this transcription factor represents a key molecular target in efforts to control vascular lesion formation in humans. In this study, we have generated DNAzymes targeting specific sequences in human EGR-1 mRNA. These molecules cleave in vitro transcribed EGR-1 mRNA efficiently at preselected sites, inhibit EGR-1 protein expression in human aortic smooth muscle cells, block serum-inducible cell proliferation, and abrogate cellular regrowth after mechanical injury in vitro. These DNAzymes also selectively inhibit EGR-1 expression and proliferation of porcine arterial smooth muscle cells and reduce intimal thickening after stenting pig coronary arteries in vivo. These findings demonstrate that endoluminally delivered DNAzymes targeting EGR-1 may serve as inhibitors of in-stent restenosis.

Key Words: catalytic DNA • transcription factors • early growth response factor-1 • stenting • gene therapy

	Introduction

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
The capacity to selectively target specific mRNA sequences with catalytic molecules composed of DNA provides immense potential to broaden our understanding of the roles of specific mediators in normal and pathologic settings. Catalytic DNA can be used to cleave the phosphodiester linkage between virtually any unpaired purine and paired pyrimidine, selectivity being conferred by the nucleotide sequences of the hybridizing arms. These next-generation antisense oligonucleotides are extremely specific and easy to synthesize and have low toxicity, because they do not require phosphorothioate or other backbone modifications to confer nuclease resistance. DNAzyme biotechnology has practical therapeutic implications as a new category of gene-suppression agents in pathophysiological settings.

Stenting of coronary atherosclerotic lesions has revolutionized the treatment of cardiovascular disease in the last 5 years, after two landmark trials demonstrating a reduction in restenosis relative to coronary balloon angioplasty in comparable vessels.^1,2 Stents prevent elastic recoil of the artery via their ability to provide a structural scaffold on the interior of the vessel.³ Stenting has now virtually replaced angioplasty⁴ to the extent that in-stent restenosis has now itself become a significant problem.⁵ Lesions of in-stent restenosis arise mainly from vascular smooth muscle cell (SMC)¹ proliferation in response to mechanical injury imparted to the vessel by stenting.⁶ This culminates in the thickening of the intima within the rigid stent. Brachytherapy may help reduce in-stent restenosis,^7,8 although a recent study indicates that radioactive stents may simply delay rather than prevent in-stent neointimal proliferation.⁹ To date there is only one example of a catalytic nucleic acid that has been used in efforts to inhibit SMC proliferation and in-stent restenosis in pig coronary arteries. Frimerman et al¹⁰ locally delivered hammerhead ribozymes targeting the cell-cycle regulatory protein proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and observed a 28% reduction of in-stent restenosis. These ribozymes, despite their chimeric structure, were extremely labile to nucleolytic degradation.

The promoters of many genes whose products stimulate SMC proliferation, migration, and matrix synthesis contain binding sites for the immediate-early gene and transcription factor early growth response factor-1 (Egr-1, also known as NGFI-A, TIS8, and krox24).^11,12 Egr-1 is rapidly activated by acute mechanical injury in vitro and in vivo and numerous other proatherogenic agonists and environmental stimuli, such as growth factors, hormones, and fluid biomechanical forces.¹² In humans, FGF-2, a potent trigger of Egr-1 expression,¹³ is released locally in the vicinity of human atherosclerotic plaques after coronary stenting.¹⁴ EGR-1 immunoreactivity has recently been localized to SMCs and other cell types within atheromatous lesions.¹⁵ Together, these observations suggest that EGR-1 may play a regulatory role in the vascular response to injury in humans. The aim of this study was to generate novel DNAzymes targeting human EGR-1 and demonstrate their ability to inhibit human SMC proliferation, regrowth in response to injury in vitro, and in-stent restenosis in porcine coronary arteries after stenting and endoluminal delivery.

	Materials and Methods

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Details of in vitro transcript generation and cleavage experiments,^16–18 cleavage kinetics of EGR-1 mRNA, cell culture, and DNAzyme transfection, Western blot analysis, in vitro SMC injury,¹⁹ cell proliferation assay, and the porcine in-stent restenosis model^10,20–25 can be obtained in the online data supplement available at http://www.circresaha.org.

	Results

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
DNAzymes Targeting Human EGR-1 Cleave In Vitro Transcribed EGR-1 mRNA
We generated a series of DNAzymes (DzA to DzG) targeting various purine-pyrimidine junctions in human EGR-1 mRNA (Figure 1A). Cleavage of an in vitro transcribed 388-nucleotide-long ³²P-labeled human EGR-1 transcript spanning the translational start site by several of the DNAzymes (DzA, DzB, and DzC) produced fragments of expected size as early as 5 minutes and proceeded in a time-dependent manner (Figure 1B, left). In contrast, no reaction products were apparent using DzE (Figure 1B, right). ED5,¹⁷ targeting rat Egr-1 also failed to cleave the human substrate (data not shown), demonstrating the limitation of ED5 as a catalytic inhibitor of human EGR-1. A fourth DNAzyme, DzF, also cleaved the human EGR-1 mRNA (Figure 1C, left), whereas a size-matched counterpart of DzF, DzFscr, bearing an active catalytic domain flanked by arms with scrambled sequence, had no effect (Figure 1C, left). The DNAzyme cleaved its substrate over a wide range of molar ratios spanning 0.5 to 50 molecules of DNAzyme to 1-molecule substrate (Figure 1C, right). Single-turnover kinetic analysis of DzA and DzF with the 388-nucleotide RNA substrate revealed similar catalytic efficiencies (k_cat/k_m) of 3.42x10³ (mol/L)^-1 · min^-1 and 1.90x10³ (mol/L)^-1 · min^-1, respectively (Figure 1D). k_cat/k_m values of 8.68x10⁷ (mol/L)^-1 · min^-1 and 7.77x10⁷ (mol/L)^-1 ·min^-1 for DzA and DzF, respectively, after multiple turnover kinetic analysis using a 23-nucleotide synthetic RNA substrate (data not shown) indicate superior catalytic efficiencies comparable with other DNAzymes of the 10 to 23 subtype.^16,26,27 These data, taken together, demonstrate sequence-, time-, and dose-dependent DNAzyme cleavage of human EGR-1 mRNA.

View larger version (37K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1. Generation of DNAzymes targeting human EGR-1. DNAzymes (11.4 pmol) were incubated with 32P-labeled, in vitro transcribed, 388-nucleotide-long human EGR-1 mRNA for various times at 37°C before termination of the reaction and electrophoresis under denaturing conditions. A, Schematic representation of DNAzyme target sites in human EGR-1 mRNA. Sequence of DzA is 5'-CAGGGGACAGGCTAGCTACAACGAGC-TTGCGGGTi-3' (3' T is inverted, 10-23 catalytic domain is underlined), DzB is 5'-TGCAGGGGAGGCTAGCTACAACGAAC-CGTTGCGTi-3', DzC is 5'-CATCCTGGAGGCTAGCTACAACGA-GAGCAGGCTTi-3', DzE is 5'-TCAGCTGCAGGCTAGCTACAA-CGACTCGGCCTTTi-3', DzF is 5'-GCGGGGACAGGCTAGC-TACAACGACAGCTGCATTi-3', and DzG is 5'-CAGCGGGGA-GGCTAGCTACAACGAATCAGCTGCTi-3'. B, Cleavage of human EGR-1 mRNA by DNAzymes DzA, DzB, and DzC but not DzE. The 388-nucleotide substrate and various size cleavage products are indicated. C, Sequence-specific, time-dependent, and dose-dependent cleavage of human EGR-1 mRNA by DzF. DNAzyme to mRNA substrate ratio is shown in the right panel. The 388-nucleotide substrate and various size cleavage products are indicated. D, Kinetic single-turnover analysis of DzA and DzF cleavage of human EGR-1 mRNA. Slopes, obtained by plotting the observed reaction rate (k) against the DNAzyme concentration, represent catalytic efficiencies (kcat/km) for each DNAzyme. r2 for DzA and DzF is 0.881 and 0.890, respectively.

DNAzymes Inhibit Production of EGR-1 Protein in Human Vascular SMCs
We next determined the effect of DzA and DzF on the serum-inducible expression of EGR-1. Western blot analysis demonstrated that EGR-1 protein is poorly expressed in growth-quiescent primary human aortic SMCs but is activated within 1 hour of exposure to serum. The induction of EGR-1 was virtually abrogated by previous exposure to DzA and DzF (0.4 µmol/L). In contrast, neither the noncleaving DNAzyme (DzE, Figure 2, top) nor the scrambled DNAzyme (DzFscr, Figure 2, bottom) had any inhibitory effect on the induction of EGR-1. Reprobing the blot with antibodies directed to the structurally related zinc finger transcription factor Sp1 revealed no inhibitory effect of DNAzyme on levels of this constitutively expressed nuclear protein (Figure 2, top).

View larger version (30K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 2. DzA and DzF inhibit EGR-1 protein expression in human aortic SMCs. Subconfluent growth-quiescent SMCs were transfected twice with DNAzyme and incubated in medium containing 5% FBS for 1 hour at 37°C. Western blot analysis was performed with cell lysates (5 to 10 µg), polyclonal antipeptide EGR-1 or Sp1 antibodies, and chemiluminescent detection. Mr markers are indicated on the right of each figure. The Coomassie Blue–stained gel shows unbiased loading.

EGR-1 DNAzymes Block Human SMC Regrowth After Injury
In a well-established in vitro model of wounding,¹³ DzA (0.4 µmol/L) inhibited SMC regrowth into the denuded zone by 50% (Figure 3). Even greater inhibition (80%) was observed using DzF (Figure 3). In contrast, equivalent concentrations of DzFscr or ED5scr (ie, ED5 with scrambled arms) failed to modulate this process (Figure 3). Within the confines of this model, these data support the notion that EGR-1 plays a positive regulatory role in the reparative response of human SMCs to mechanical injury.

View larger version (41K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 3. DzA and DzF inhibit wound repair after mechanical injury of human aortic SMCs. Confluent growth-quiescent SMCs transfected with DNAzyme were scraped and then incubated for 72 hours at 37°C. The cells were fixed and then stained with H&E and photographed. Cell numbers in the denuded zone were counted and represented histodiagrammatically. Lower panel shows representative data, with arrows showing the wound edge.

Human SMC Proliferation Is Inhibited by EGR-1 DNAzymes
We next assessed the capacity of the various EGR-1 DNAzymes to inhibit human SMC replication. At 0.3 µmol/L, DzF inhibited serum-inducible proliferation by 50% (Figure 4A), whereas DzB, DzC, ED5scr, and, surprisingly, DzA had no effect (Figure 4A). However, at 0.4 µmol/L, DzF inhibited SMC proliferation virtually by 100%, whereas DzFscr, DzB, DzC, DzE, and ED5scr failed to attenuate the mitogenic response (Figure 4A). Interestingly, at this concentration (0.4 µmol/L), inhibition by DzA was apparent (Figure 4A). These findings show that DzF can inhibit cell growth at concentrations that DzA cannot. DzF is thus a more potent inhibitor of human SMC proliferation than DzA.

View larger version (19K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 4. DzA and DzF inhibit human aortic SMC proliferation. A, Dose-dependent DNAzyme inhibition of cellular mitogenesis. Subconfluent growth-quiescent SMCs transfected with DNAzyme were exposed to 5% FBS at 37°C for 72 hours. Cells were trypsinized, and the suspensions were quantitated in an automated Coulter counter. B, Sustained DNAzyme inhibition of cellular proliferation. Twenty-four hours after transfection with DNAzyme in medium containing 5% FBS, cell populations in each cohort were quantitated. Fresh medium in which DNAzyme was absent was added to the remaining cells, and the suspensions were counted 54 hours later, 78 hours after transfection with DNAzyme.

To determine whether the inhibitory effect of DzF on SMC proliferation was reversible, culture medium containing serum and DzF was replaced with medium containing serum alone. Twenty-four hours after continuous exposure to DNAzyme, cell numbers in the DzFscr group, as expected, exceeded those of the DzF group (Figure 4B, compare columns 2 and 1). When the cells were then incubated with fresh medium without DNAzyme, the population of cells in the DzFscr group continued to increase over the next 54 hours (Figure 4B, compare columns 4 and 2). In contrast, cell replication in the DzF group did not change over the same time course (Figure 4B, compare columns 3 and 1). These findings demonstrate sequence-specific, long-lived, and irreversible inhibition by DzF.

Induction of EGR-1 Protein and Proliferation of Porcine Vascular SMCs Is Inhibited by EGR-1 DNAzymes
Before evaluating the effect of these DNAzymes on intimal thickening in a porcine model of arterial injury, we first determined the influence of these molecules on levels of Egr-1 in growth-quiescent primary pig aortic SMCs. DzA and DzF both inhibited serum-inducible Egr-1 protein expression at 0.4 µmol/L, although the latter DNAzyme produced greater inhibition (Figure 5A). In contrast, ED5scr and DzG had no inhibitory effect. Neither DzF nor DzA could downregulate levels of serum-inducible Egr-2 (Figure 5A) or c-Jun (Figure 5A) or affect constitutive levels of Sp1 (Figure 5A). Both DNAzymes also failed to affect levels of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) or p53 (data not shown). These data indicate gene-specific inhibition by two EGR-1 DNAzymes.

View larger version (22K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 5. DzA and DzF inhibit EGR-1 protein expression and proliferation of porcine aortic SMCs. A, EGR-1 DNAzymes inhibit EGR-1 but not EGR-2, c-Jun, or Sp1 expression. Subconfluent growth-quiescent porcine vascular SMCs were transfected twice with DNAzyme and incubated in medium containing 5% FBS for 1 hour at 37°C. Western blot analysis was performed with lysates (5 to 10 µg), antipeptide antibodies to EGR-1, EGR-2, c-Jun, or Sp1, and chemiluminescent detection. The Coomassie Blue–stained gel shows unbiased loading. B, Inhibition of serum-inducible porcine vascular SMC proliferation. Subconfluent growth-quiescent SMCs transfected with DNAzyme were exposed to 5% FBS at 37°C for 72 hours. Cells were trypsinized, and the suspensions were quantitated in an automated Coulter counter.

DzA and DzF blocked serum-inducible porcine aortic SMC proliferation at 0.4 µmol/L. At this concentration, DzF completely inhibited cell replication (Figure 5A), whereas DzA inhibited by 75% (Figure 5B). Porcine vascular SMC proliferation was not significantly inhibited by DzE, DzG, or ED5scr (Figure 5B).

Effects of EGR-1 DNAzymes on Coronary In-Stent Restenosis
We next assessed the ability of these DNAzymes to inhibit in-stent restenosis in the porcine coronary stent model.^24,28 Thirty-two stents were successfully deployed in 26 animals (Figures 6A and 6B). Three animals died from procedural complications (ventricular fibrillation in one, stent thrombosis in the second, and refractory ischemia after drug delivery in the third). At the 30-day histological examination, we found that two stents (from the stent-only and DzA groups) had been unsuccessfully deployed and were consequently excluded from additional analysis. The Transport catheter we used bears 48x250-µm-diameter pores, which facilitates delivery at low pressure, reducing the likelihood of trauma from the delivery procedure per se.²¹ Increased neointima formation has been reported by infusion of vehicle alone using comparable delivery techniques,^22,29 suggesting that local balloon delivery can induce vessel trauma. However, infusion of vehicle into the vessel wall did not influence the course of in-stent neointimal thickening after 30 days (Figures 6C and 6D).

View larger version (89K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 6. DzF, but not DzA, inhibits intimal thickening in stented porcine coronary arteries. A, Local drug delivery and stent deployment. DNAzyme was delivered endoluminally into the coronary arteries (left) of normolipemic farm pigs (30 to 50 kg) locally (middle) using a transport catheter after stenting. Thirty days after the procedure, pigs were sacrificed, and stented coronary vessels (right) were withdrawn for sectioning for histomorphometric analysis and staining. Guiding catheter (GC) is shown placed in the left main coronary artery (LMCA) and contrast filling the left anterior descending (LAD) and circumflex (CX) coronary arteries. The inflated transport catheter balloon (T) is demonstrated delivering DNAzyme to stented site. Stent (S) is evident in the LAD, adjacent to coronary vein (CV), before removal for analysis. B, Localization of FITC-labeled DzA (1 mg) into cells of the pig coronary artery wall after endoluminal delivery. Sections were stained with H&E (bottom). C, Reduced in-stent stenosis after endoluminal administration of DzF. Neointimal areas in two sections from each stented vessel were quantitated using customized image software25 in a blinded manner, based on previous methods.10 Injury scores were assigned according to previous methods.24 Probability value according to Student’s 2-tailed, 2-sampled t test for unequal variance. D through J, Representative cross sections of porcine coronary arteries after stenting and DNAzyme administration. Sections were stained with H&E and show the neointima (N), media (M), adventitia (A), and stent struts (in black) (S). D represents stent alone; E, DzF group; F, DzA; G, vehicle; H, DzE; and I and J, enlargements from panels D and E, respectively.

DzF inhibited intimal thickening by >40% (Table; Figures 6C and 6D), whereas neither DzA nor DzE had any effect (Figures 6C and 6D). Interestingly, the failure of DzA to block vascular repair in this model is entirely consistent with the preceding in vitro data showing inferior inhibition of regrowth after injury (Figure 3) and proliferation in two cell types (Figures 4A and 5B) at any given concentration. These observations, taken together, demonstrate the therapeutic potential of DzF as an inhibitor of in-stent restenosis.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   Table 1. Effect of DNAzyme on Neointimal Formation After Porcine Coronary Stenting

	Discussion

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
In the present study, we generated and characterized novel DNAzymes targeting human EGR-1, which specifically cleave EGR-1 mRNA and inhibit EGR-1 protein expression in vascular SMCs. These molecules block SMC replication and regrowth after acute physical injury and reduce in-stent restenosis. Histopathological studies suggest that SMC proliferation is an important contributor to the pathogenesis of in-stent restenosis.^6,30 The present observations demonstrate the therapeutic potential of EGR-1 DNAzymes in this pathologic setting and provide the first in vivo proof-of-principle demonstration of the possible clinical utility of catalytic DNA-based molecules targeting a specific human transcription factor as adjuncts to stents.

DNAzymes represent an exciting new technology, with great potential for use in diverse pathologies. For example, biologically active DNAzymes have recently been generated to CCR5,³¹ Huntingtin,³² and bcr-abl.³³ Common to the composition of all DNAzymes is gene specificity conferred by the two arms, which can vary in length,³⁴ flanking a cation-dependent catalytic domain.¹⁶ Despite similar catalytic efficiencies for EGR-1 mRNA, DzF and DzA showed consistent differences in biological potency. At any given concentration, DzF inhibited SMC proliferation and wound repair more effectively than DzA. Similarly, DzF inhibited in-stent restenosis, whereas DzA had no effect. These data suggest that the performance of a given DNAzyme in the context of in vitro cleavage experiments has little bearing on its biological potency. This is additionally supported by our earlier demonstration that DzB and DzC cleave human EGR-1 substrate and yet have no inhibitory effect on SMC proliferation. These discrepancies may be explained by differences in overall conformation between in vitro transcribed mRNA (which is often not the complete sequence) and endogenous cellular mRNA, influencing the accessibility of a given DNAzyme for its target site. In the selection of DNAzymes, therefore, the ability to cleave an mRNA substrate should be seen as a prerequisite, rather than a determinant, of in vivo efficacy.

A recent study indicates minimal neointimal hyperplasia in patients treated with stents coated with growth inhibitor Sirolimus,³⁵ which binds its intracellular receptor, inducing p27 and cell-cycle arrest. Expression analysis of atherectomy samples from patients with symptomatic in-stent restenosis showed elevated levels of the Sirolimus receptor FK506BP12.³⁶ These findings support the notion that proliferation is an important cellular process contributing to in-stent restenosis. The present study provides additional evidence that EGR-1 is a positive regulator in vascular SMC growth, both in vitro and in the pig coronary artery wall. Egr-1 is activated after angioplasty in animal models as well as several other pathophysiologic stimuli, including growth factors, cytokines, and changes in fluid biomechanical forces.³⁷ Egr-1, in turn, switches on the transcription of many genes whose expression positively influences SMC proliferation, migration, and the formation of a neointima.¹⁹ EGR-1 might therefore be considered a master switch, given its activation by diverse agonists and conditions and its capacity to trigger the production of multiple proatherogenic and restenotic genes in the injured artery wall.³⁷ The present data demonstrate reduced intimal thickening in vessels treated with EGR-1 DNAzyme delivered at the time of injury. Because EGR-1, as an immediate-early gene, is rapidly and transiently expressed on injury, it is therefore imperative that in the clinical setting, DNAzymes targeting EGR-1 should also be delivered locally at the time of injury. Such therapy would be particularly valuable if inhibition of SMC proliferation persisted well after the agent had been delivered. Our findings demonstrate that replication does not reinitiate in cells transfected with DzF, even days after removal of the DNAzyme from the culture supernatant, consistent with the superior stability 9+9 DNAzymes bearing a 3'-3'–linked inverted T to nucleolytic digestion in serum.¹⁷

The porcine model of coronary stenting used in the present study has several well-documented limitations.^28,38 Porcine coronary arteries are normal, atheroma-free vessels, distinct from the atheromatous lesions treated clinically in humans.³⁸ In the pig, in-stent restenosis is examined at 28 to 30 days, whereas in humans, restenosis is generally examined within at least 3 months.^9,28 However, the response to stent-induced injury is similar between pig and human coronary arteries,²⁸ and the pig is presently the most widely used large animal model of coronary stenting and local drug delivery.^23,39,40

Two reported studies to date have demonstrated efficacy of locally delivered antisense molecules after porcine coronary angioplasty.^22,41 Shi et al⁴¹ used a porous transcatheter balloon to deliver naked phosphorothioate oligonucleotides directed against c-myc. Gunn et al²² used the transport catheter to deliver phosphorothioate oligonucleotides directed to c-myb. Both achieved inhibition of neointimal formation after angioplasty.^22,41 However, oligonucleotide inhibition of intimal thickening has not yet been demonstrated in humans. A preliminary report of antisense oligonucleotides targeting the transcription factor c-myc delivered by the transport catheter after stenting failed to show a benefit in a small group of patients.⁴² This lack of an observed effect may have been attributable to an inefficient delivery system, the type of stent used, an inadequate drug dose, or the inappropriateness of the target. The present study also used the transport catheter as the delivery device, which has its own limitations.²¹ One animal died of refractory ischemia immediately after delivery; likely the consequence of the 90-second inflation. However, although this technique appeared to cause acute, but rare, morbidity, there were no apparent longer-term sequelae, such as increased neointima formation, observed with other devices^22,29 (Figures 6C and 6D). We limited total delivery balloon inflation time to a minimum (90 seconds), which is similar or less than the times used in analogous studies.^10,22 Our use of intracoronary nitroglycerine,²⁰ bretylium,⁴³ heparin monitoring and additional bolus dosing based on activated clotting time (ACT) measurements,²⁰ and pretreatment with clopidogrel in addition to aspirin⁴⁴ likely contributed to lowered morbidity in relation to delivery. The morbidity rates in the present study are comparable to or lower than those described in other published studies.^20,45

The amount of DNAzyme (1000 µg) used in the present study was based on an ex vivo dose-escalation study in which FITC-labeled DNAzyme was delivered into pig coronary artery wall using the transport catheter. Histological examination of the cross-sections after in vivo delivery of 1000 µg of FITC-DNAzyme by fluorescence microscopy revealed extensive localization within the intima (Figure 6B). It is, of course, possible that a more efficient local delivery system could result in greater inhibition by DzF. The recent development of DNA-eluting stents in pig coronary arteries⁴⁰ provides one means of achieving this goal and demonstrates the potential for the therapeutic exploitation of DNAzymes and other demonstrably effective nucleic acid agents in human arteries.

Pertinent to the present study is a study recently reported by Frimerman et al,¹⁰ in which a chimeric hammerhead ribozyme targeting PCNA was delivered to pig coronary arteries after stenting. These investigators observed a reduction in neointimal thickness of 28%.¹⁰ However, the failure of the chimeric ribozyme to remain stable in serum¹⁰ presents a major limitation in the clinical use of RNA-based nucleic acid molecules. DNAzymes offer the distinct advantages of superior stability, ease of synthesis, and more efficient target hybridization. Besides obvious limitations in the ability of any given DNAzyme to inhibit gene expression in vivo, such as target-site accessibility, ion concentration, and optimal DNAzyme concentration and delivery, the fact that we did not observe more profound inhibition of intimal thickening with the EGR-1 DNAzyme in the present study suggests that combinatorial strategies targeting other key genes—such as PCNA, for example—may additionally inhibit the response to injury.

This is the first report of an endoluminally delivered DNAzyme able to inhibit in-stent restenosis in pig coronary arteries. These molecules are catalytically active and gene-specific, inhibit EGR-1 protein expression, and block vascular SMC proliferation and regrowth after injury. As such, catalytic oligodeoxynucleotides targeting key regulatory genes have therapeutic potential in the clinical management of in-stent restenosis.

	Acknowledgments

 
This work was supported by grants from Johnson and Johnson Research Pty. Limited, National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), and the New South Wales State Department of Health. H.C.L. is supported by an NHMRC Medical Research Scholarship. L.M.K. is a Fellow of the NHMRC. The porcine stenting studies were performed in the Cardiac Mechanics Research Laboratory, Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, through the assistance of Professor Michael Feneley. We thank Michelle Costandi, Drs Antony Nicholson and Scott Kesteven for excellent technical assistance, Dr Gregory Kopia for independent assessment of the sections, and Dr Murray Cairns and Professor David Muller for helpful advice.

Received April 30, 2001; revision received August 20, 2001; accepted August 20, 2001.

	References

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 

1. Fischman DL, Leon MB, Baim DS, Schatz RA, Savage MP, Penn I, Detre K, Veltri L, Ricci D, Nobuyoshi M, Cleman M, Heuser R, Almond D, Teirstein PS, Fish RD, Colombo A, Brinker J, Moses J, Shaknovich A, Hirshfeld J, Bailey S, Ellis S, Rake R, Goldberg S. A randomized comparison of coronary-stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 1994; 331: 496–501.
2. Serruys PW, de Jaegere P, Kiemeneij F, Macaya C, Rutsch W, Heyndrickx G, Emanuelsson H, Marco J, Legrand V, Materne P, Belardi J, Sigwart U, Colombo A, Goy JJ, van den Heuvel P, Delcan J, Morel M-A. A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 1994; 331: 489–495.
3. Edelman ER, Rogers C. Pathobiologic responses to stenting. Am J Cardiol. 1998; 81: 4E–6E.
4. Lane DM. Dramatic increase in the use of coronary stents. Am J Cardiol. 1999; 84: 1141.
5. Topol EJ, Serruys PW. Frontiers in interventional cardiology. Circulation. 1998; 98: 1802–1820.
6. Kearney M, Pieczek A, Haley L, Losordo DW, Andres V, Schainfeld R, Rosenfeld K, Isner JM. Histopathology of in-stent restenosis in patients with peripheral artery disease. Circulation. 1997; 95: 1998–2002.
7. Coen VL, Knook AH, Wardeh AJ, van der Giessen WJ, De Pan C, Sipkema D, Marijnissen JP, Sabate M, den Boer A, Serruys PW, Levendag PC. Endovascular brachytherapy in coronary arteries: the Rotterdam experience. Cardiovasc Radiat Med. 2001; 2: 42–50.
8. Raizner AE, Oesterle SN, Waksman R, Serruys PW, Colombo A, Lim YL, Yeung AC, van der Giessen WJ, Vandertie L, Chiu JK, White LR, Fitzgerald PJ, Kaluza GL, Ali NM. Inhibition of restenosis with beta-emitting radiotherapy: Report of the Proliferation Reduction with Vascular Energy Trial (PREVENT). Circulation. 2000; 102: 951–958.
9. Kay PI, A.J.W, Kozuma K, Foley DP, Knook AHM, Thury A, Sianos G, van der Giessen WJ, Levedag PC, Serruys PW. Radioactive stents delay but do not prevent in-stent neointimal hyperplasia. Circulation. 2001; 103: 14–17.
10. Frimerman A, Welch PJ, Jin X, Eigler N, Yei S, Forrester J, Honda H, Makkar R, Barber J, Litvak F. Chimeric DNA-RNA hammerhead ribozyme to proliferating cell nuclear antigen reduces stent-induced stenosis in a porcine coronary model. Circulation. 1999; 99: 697–703.
11. Gashler A, Sukhatme V. Early growth response protein 1 (Egr-1): prototype of a zinc-finger family of transcription factors. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol. 1995; 50: 191–224.
12. Khachigian LM, Collins T. Early growth response factor 1: a pleiotropic mediator of inducible gene expression. J Mol Med. 1998; 76: 613–616.
13. Santiago FS, Lowe HC, Day FL, Chesterman CN, Khachigian LM. Egr-1 induction by injury is triggered by release and paracrine activation by fibroblast growth factor-2. Am J Pathol. 1999; 154: 937–944.
14. Lowe HC, Chesterman CN, Hopkins A, Juergens CP, Khachigian LM. Acute local release of fibroblast growth factor-2 but not transforming growth factor-ß1 following coronary stenting. Thromb Haemost. 2001; 83: 574–576.
15. McCaffrey TA, Fu C, Du C, Eskinar S, Kent KC, Bush H, Jr, Kreiger K, Rosengart T, Cybulsky MI, Silverman ES, Collins T. High-level expression of Egr-1 and Egr-1-inducible genes in mouse and human atherosclerosis. J Clin Invest. 2000; 105: 653–662.
16. Santoro SW, Joyce GF. A general purpose RNA-cleaving DNA enzyme. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997; 94: 4262–4266.
17. Santiago FS, Lowe HC, Kavurma MM, Chesterman CN, Baker A, Atkins DG, Khachigian LM. New DNA enzyme targeting Egr-1 mRNA inhibits vascular smooth muscle proliferation and regrowth factor injury. Nat Med. 1999; 11: 1264–1269.
18. Zuker M. On finding all suboptimal foldings of an RNA molecule. Science. 1989; 244: 48–52.
19. Khachigian LM, Lindner V, Williams AJ, Collins T. Egr-1-induced endothelial gene expression: a common theme in vascular injury. Science. 1996; 271: 1427–1431.
20. Volmar B, Bay W, Ozzbeck C, Heib K-D, Menger MD, Schieffer H-J. Experimental intracoronary stenting: comprehensive experience in a porcine model. Lab Anim. 1998; 32: 191–199.
21. Brieger D, Topol EJ. Local drug delivery systems and prevention of restenosis. Cardiovasc Res. 1997; 35: 405–413.
22. Gunn J, Holt CM, Francis SE, Shepherd L, Grohmann M, Newman CMH, Crossman DC, Cumberland DC. The effect of oligonucleotides to c-myb on vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation and neointima formation after porcine coronary angioplasty. Circ Res. 1997; 80: 520–531.
23. Alt E, Haehnel I, Beilharz C, Prietzel K, Preter D, Stemberger A, Fliedner T, Erhardt W, Schomig A. Inhibition of neointima formation after experimental coronary artery stenting: a new biodegradable stent coating releasing hirudin and the prostacyclin analogue iloprost. Circulation. 2000; 101: 1453–1458.
24. Schwartz RS, Huber KC, Murphy JG, Edwards WD, Camrud AR, Vlietstra RE, Holmes DR. Restenosis and the proportional neointimal response to coronary artery injury: results in a porcine model. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992; 19: 267–274.
25. Halasz P, Martin P. A microcomputer-based system for semi-automatic analysis of histological sections. Proc Royal Microscop Soc. 1984; 19: 312–316.
26. Sun L-Q, Cairns MJ, Gerlach WL, Witherington C, Wang L, King A. Suppression of smooth muscle cell proliferation by a c-myc RNA-cleaving deoxyribozyme. J Biol Chem. 1999; 274: 17236–17241.
27. Warashina M, Kuwabara T, Nakamatsu Y, Taira K. Extremely high and specific activity of DNA enzymes in cells with a Philadelphia chromosome. Chem Biol. 1999; 6: 237–250.
28. Schwartz RS,ed. Animal Models of Human Coronary Restenosis. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders; 1994.
29. Kim WH, Hong MK, Kornowski R, Tio FO, Leon MB. Saline infusion via local drug delivery catheters is associated with increased neointimal hyperplasia in a porcine coronary in-stent restenosis model. Coron Artery Dis. 1999; 10: 629–632.
30. Virmani R, Farb A, Burke AP. Coronary angioplasty from the perspective of atherosclerotic plaque: morphologic predictors of immediate success and restenosis. Am Heart J. 1994; 127: 163–179.
31. Goila R, Banerjea AC. Sequence-specific cleavage of the HIV-1 coreceptor CCR5 gene by a hammer-head ribozyme and a DNA-enzyme: inhibition of the coreceptor function by DNA-enzyme. FEBS Lett. 1998; 436: 233–238.
32. Yen L, Strittmatter SM, Kalb RG. Sequence-specific cleavage of Huntingtin mRNA by catalytic DNA. Ann Neurol. 1999; 46: 366–373.
33. Kuwabara T, Warashina M, Tanabe T, Tani K, Asano S, Taira K. Comparison of the specificities and catalytic activities of hammerhead ribozymes and DNA enzymes with respect to the cleavage of BCR-ABL chimeric L6 (b2a2) mRNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997; 25: 3074–3091.
34. Cairns MJ, Hopkins TM, Witherington C, Wang L, Sun L-Q. Target site selection for an RNA-cleaving catalytic DNA. Nat Biotech. 1999; 17: 480–486.
35. Sousa JE, Costa MA, Abizaid A, Abizaid AS, Feres F, Pinto IMF, Seixas AC, Staico R, Mattos LA, Sousa AGMR, Falotico R, Jaeger J, Popma JJ, Serruys PW. Lack of neointimal proliferation after implantation of Sirolimus-coated stents in human coronary arteries: a quantitative coronary angiography and three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation. 2001; 103: 192–195.
36. Zohlnhofer D, Klein CA, Richter T, Brandl R, Murr A, Nuhrenberg T, Schumig A, Baeuerle PA, Neumann F-J. Gene expression profiling of human stent-induced neointima by cDNA array analysis of microscopic specimens retrieved by helix cutter atherectomy: detection of FK506-binding protein 12 upregulation. Circulation. 2001; 103: 1396–1402.
37. Khachigian LM, Collins T. Inducible expression of Egr-1-dependent genes: a paradigm of transcriptional activation in vascular endothelium. Circ Res. 1997; 81: 457–461.
38. Muller DWM, Eliis SG, Topol EJ. Experimental models of coronary artery restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992; 19: 418–432.
39. Johnson GJ, Griggs TR, Badimon L on behalf of the Subcommittee on Animal, Cellular and Molecular Models of Thrombosis and Haemostasis of the Scientific and Standardization Committee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. The utility of animal models in the preclinical study of interventions to prevent human coronary artery restenosis: analysis and recommendations. Thromb Haemost. 1999; 81: 835–843.
40. Klugherz BD, Jones PL, Cui X, Chen W, Meneveau NF, DeFelice S, Connolly J, Wilensky RL, Levy RJ. Gene delivery from a DNA controlled-release stent in porcine coronary arteries. Nat Biotech. 2000; 18: 1181–1184.
41. Shi Y, Fard A, Galeo A, Hutchinson HG, Vermani P, Dodge GR, Hall DJ, Shaheen F, Zalewski A. Transcatheter delivery of c-myc antisense oligomers reduces neointimal formation in a porcine model of coronary artery balloon injury. Circulation. 1994; 90: 944–951.
42. Serruys PW, Kutryk MJB, Bruining N, Sabate M, Foley DP, van den Brand M, Hamburger JN, van der Giessen WJ, Eijgelshoven MH, de Feyter PJ. Antisense oligonucleotide against c-myc administered with the Transportos delivery catheter for the prevention of in-stent restenosis: results of the randomized ITALICS trial. Circulation. 1998; 98 (suppl I): I-363.Abstract.
43. Liu MW, Anderson PG, Luo JF, Roubin GS. Local delivery of ethanol inhibits intimal hyperplasia in pig coronaries after balloon angioplasty. Circulation. 1997; 96: 2296–2301.
44. Berger PB, Bell MR, Rihal CS, Ting H, Barsness G, Garratt K, Bellot V, Mathew V, Melby S, Hammes L, Grill D, Holmes DR. Clopidogrel versus ticlopidine after percutaneous stent placement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999; 34: 1891–1894.
45. Varenne O, Gerard RD, Sinnaeve P, Gillijns H, Collen D, Janssens S. Percutaneous adenoviral gene transfer into porcine coronary arteries: is catheter-based gene delivery adapted to coronary circulation? Hum Gene Ther. 1999; 10: 1105–1115.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. P. Malabanan, P. Kanellakis, A. Bobik, and L. M. Khachigian Activation Transcription Factor-4 Induced by Fibroblast Growth Factor-2 Regulates Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-A Transcription in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells and Mediates Intimal Thickening in Rat Arteries Following Balloon Injury Circ. Res., August 15, 2008; 103(4): 378 - 387. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Sanchez-Guerrero, V. C. Midgley, and L. M. Khachigian Angiotensin II induction of PDGF-C expression is mediated by AT1 receptor-dependent Egr-1 transactivation Nucleic Acids Res., April 1, 2008; 36(6): 1941 - 1951. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Bhindi, R. G. Fahmy, H. C. Lowe, C. N. Chesterman, C. R. Dass, M. J. Cairns, E. G. Saravolac, L.-Q. Sun, and L. M. Khachigian Brothers in Arms: DNA Enzymes, Short Interfering RNA, and the Emerging Wave of Small-Molecule Nucleic Acid-Based Gene-Silencing Strategies Am. J. Pathol., October 1, 2007; 171(4): 1079 - 1088. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S.-F. Yan, E. Harja, M. Andrassy, T. Fujita, and A. M. Schmidt Protein Kinase C {beta}/Early Growth Response-1 Pathway: A Key Player in Ischemia, Atherosclerosis, and Restenosis J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 27, 2006; 48(9_Suppl_A): A47 - A55. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. M. Khachigian Early Growth Response-1 in Cardiovascular Pathobiology Circ. Res., February 3, 2006; 98(2): 186 - 191. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. M. de Mestre, S. Rao, J. R. Hornby, T. Soe-Htwe, L. M. Khachigian, and M. D. Hulett Early Growth Response Gene 1 (EGR1) Regulates Heparanase Gene Transcription in Tumor Cells J. Biol. Chem., October 21, 2005; 280(42): 35136 - 35147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Andrassy, D. Belov, E. Harja, Y. S. Zou, M. Leitges, H. A. Katus, P. P. Nawroth, S. D. Yan, A. M. Schmidt, and S.-F. Yan Central Role of PKC{beta} in Neointimal Expansion Triggered by Acute Arterial Injury Circ. Res., March 4, 2005; 96(4): 476 - 483. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. Spin, S. Nallamshetty, R. Tabibiazar, E. A. Ashley, J. Y. King, M. Chen, P. S. Tsao, and T. Quertermous Transcriptional profiling of in vitro smooth muscle cell differentiation identifies specific patterns of gene and pathway activation Physiol Genomics, November 17, 2004; 19(3): 292 - 302. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Forrest and C. McNamara Id Family of Transcription Factors and Vascular Lesion Formation Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., November 1, 2004; 24(11): 2014 - 2020. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. C. Midgley and L. M. Khachigian Fibroblast Growth Factor-2 Induction of Platelet-derived Growth Factor-C Chain Transcription in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells Is ERK-dependent but Not JNK-dependent and Mediated by Egr-1 J. Biol. Chem., September 24, 2004; 279(39): 40289 - 40295. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Mitchell, C. R. Dass, L.-Q. Sun, and L. M. Khachigian Inhibition of human breast carcinoma proliferation, migration, chemoinvasion and solid tumour growth by DNAzymes targeting the zinc finger transcription factor EGR-1 Nucleic Acids Res., June 4, 2004; 32(10): 3065 - 3069. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Zhang, C. R. Dass, E. Sumithran, N. Di Girolamo, L.-Q. Sun, and L. M. Khachigian Effect of Deoxyribozymes Targeting c-Jun on Solid Tumor Growth and Angiogenesis in Rodents J Natl Cancer Inst, May 5, 2004; 96(9): 683 - 696. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. G. Fahmy and L. M. Khachigian Locked nucleic acid modified DNA enzymes targeting early growth response-1 inhibit human vascular smooth muscle cell growth Nucleic Acids Res., April 23, 2004; 32(7): 2281 - 2285. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. A. Nunamaker, H.-Y. Zhang, Y. Shirasawa, J. N. Benoit, and D. A. Dean Electroporation-mediated delivery of catalytic oligodeoxynucleotides for manipulation of vascular gene expression Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2003; 285(5): H2240 - H2247. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. S. Absi, T. M. Sundt III, W. S. Tung, M. Moon, J. K. Lee, R. R. Damiano Jr, and R. W. Thompson Altered patterns of gene expression distinguishing ascending aortic aneurysms from abdominal aortic aneurysms: complementary DNA expression profiling in the molecular characterization of aortic disease J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2003; 126(2): 344 - 357. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. S. Kumar and G. K. Owens Combinatorial Control of Smooth Muscle-Specific Gene Expression Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., May 1, 2003; 23(5): 737 - 747. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Martinez-Gonzalez, J. Rius, A. Castello, C. Cases-Langhoff, and L. Badimon Neuron-Derived Orphan Receptor-1 (NOR-1) Modulates Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell Proliferation Circ. Res., January 10, 2003; 92(1): 96 - 103. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. M. Khachigian, R. G. Fahmy, G. Zhang, Y. V. Bobryshev, and A. Kaniaros c-Jun Regulates Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell Growth and Neointima Formation after Arterial Injury. INHIBITION BY A NOVEL DNA ENZYME TARGETING c-Jun J. Biol. Chem., June 14, 2002; 277(25): 22985 - 22991. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. C. Lowe, L. M. Khachigian, J. Sun, S. O. Marx, H.-J. Chen, A. R. Marks, L. E. Rabbani, and M. Poon Coating Stents With Antirestenotic Drugs: The Blunderbuss or the Magic Bullet? Response Circulation, January 29, 2002; 105 (4): e29 - e29. [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. C. Lowe, S. N. Oesterle, and L. M. Khachigian Coronary in-stent restenosis: Current status and future strategies J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 16, 2002; 39(2): 183 - 193. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract