| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cellular Biology |
From the Laboratory of Cardiovascular Sciences (S.J.S.) and Diabetes Section (J.M.E., X.W.), Gerontology Research Center, Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Aging, NIH, Baltimore, Md, and Centro de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares (M.G.V.P.), Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, La Plata, Argentina.
Correspondence to Steven J. Sollott, MD, Laboratory of Cardiovascular Science, Gerontology Research Center, Box 13, Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Aging, 5600 Nathan Shock Dr, Baltimore, MD 21224-6825. E-mail sollotts{at}grc.nia.nih.gov
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
pHi -0.09±0.02 and -0.08±0.03, respectively). The specific GLP-1 antagonist exendin 9-39 and the cAMP inhibitory analog Rp-8CPT-cAMPS inhibited both the GLP-1induced intracellular acidosis and the negative contractile effect. We conclude that in contrast to ß-adrenergic signaling, GLP-1 increases cAMP but fails to augment contraction, suggesting the existence of functionally distinct adenylyl cyclase/cAMP/protein kinase A compartments, possibly determined by unique receptor signaling microdomains that are not controlled by pertussis toxinsensitive G proteins or by enhanced local PDE or phosphatase activation. Furthermore, GLP-1 elicits a cAMP-dependent modest negative inotropic effect produced by a decrease in myofilament-Ca2+ responsiveness probably resulting from intracellular acidification.
Key Words: cardiac myocytes glucagon-like peptide-1 cAMP calcium
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the heart, the effects of GLP-1 on cAMP production and contractility are essentially unknown. However, other interventions that increase cAMP and activate AC and PKA, such as ß-adrenergic stimulation, increase cardiac contractility and enhance relaxation through a mechanism involving PKA-dependent phosphorylation of several proteins that promote Ca2+ entry, sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ uptake, and reduced myofilament Ca2+ responsiveness.68 The aim of the present study was to examine whether GLP-1 increases cAMP production in intact cardiac myocytes and to characterize its functional implications.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
[Ca2+]i, pHi, and Contraction Measurements
Standard epifluorimetric techniques were used to record [Ca2+]i and pH in single myocytes loaded with either the Ca2+ sensor indo-1 or the pH sensor seminaphthorhodafluor-1. Cell length was monitored simultaneously using the bright-field image of the cell projected onto a photodiode array.10,11
Determination of cAMP
Cellular cAMP was assayed using a standard RIA technique using a cAMP [3H] assay kit (Amersham).
Statistics
All data are mean±SEM. Comparisons within groups were made by an appropriate paired or unpaired Student t test, and P<0.05 was taken to indicate statistical significance.
An expanded Materials and Methods section can be found in the online data supplement available at http://www.circresaha.org.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
10 nmol/L and achieving saturation at 0.1 µmol/L with cAMP production increasing
3-fold from basal levels (Figure 1A, inset). Figure 1A shows that the effects of half-maximally activating concentrations (10 nmol/L) of GLP-1 and ISO (cAMP increasing from a basal value of 5.7±0.5 to 13.12±0.12 pmol/mg protein for GLP-1, and to 12.7±0.6 pmol/mg protein for ISO) were substantially enhanced by 1 mmol/L 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (IBMX), and that the GLP-1induced cAMP increase is abolished by its competitive antagonist exendin (Ex) 9-39 (0.1 µmol/L) (5.21±0.04 pmol/mg protein). Forskolin (1 µmol/L) caused effectively maximal AC activation achieving >150 to 200 pmol cAMP/mg protein (not shown). It is noteworthy that the combination of GLP-1 and ISO (at either 1 or 10 nmol/L each) does not produce an additive effect, increasing cAMP only to levels comparable with that achieved by either GLP-1 or ISO alone. Figure 1B shows that GLP-1 and ISO display similar time courses of cAMP production.
|
Effect of ISO and GLP-1 on Contraction and Intracellular Ca2+ Transient (CaT)
We next compared the effects of ISO and GLP-1 concentrations that produced comparable increases in cAMP, on the electrically stimulated contraction and CaT in indo-1loaded cardiac myocytes. As expected, ISO (10 nmol/L) induced a positive contractile effect with an increase in CaT and accelerated relaxation of both CaT and contraction (Figure 2A). In contrast, GLP-1 (10 nmol/L) induced a slight decrease in contraction, rather than the increase anticipated by its effect on cAMP production. Furthermore, the GLP-1mediated progressive decrease in contraction with time was not associated with a decrease of the CaT, suggesting that GLP-1 reduced the myofilament Ca2+ responsiveness (Figure 2B). Figure 2C shows that in the continued presence of GLP-1, ISO is still competent to induce a positive inotropic and lusitropic effect. Figure 2D depicts the contrasting effects of ISO and GLP-1 on myocyte contraction amplitude. After 15 minutes of exposure, ISO increased contraction amplitude by 100±25% whereas GLP-1 reduced it by 25±5%. Furthermore, the negative inotropic effect of GLP-1 was completely reversed by its competitive antagonist Ex 9-39. The effects of GLP-1 and ISO were fully reversible on washout (not shown).
|
Because both ISO and GLP-1 stimulation increase cAMP, we examined why they have such distinct functional behaviors. Whereas both ß1- and ß2-adrenoceptor stimulation induce similar increases in cAMP in cardiac cells, the contractile response to ß2-agonists is blunted with respect to ß1.12 Because inhibition of pertussis toxin (PTX)sensitive G proteins (Gi) by PTX markedly enhances ß2-adrenoceptorstimulated positive inotropy in rat, dog, and murine heart cells (ie, achieving levels similar to those of ß1-adrenoceptor stimulation), the functional dissociation has been attributed to coupling of ß2-adrenoceptors (but not ß1) to Gi in addition to Gs.13 In view of the apparent similarity between the ß-adrenergic system (ß1 versus ß2) and the one investigated here (ISO versus GLP-1), differential coupling to PTX-sensitive G proteins (Gi) seemed a possible mechanism to reconcile the functional dissociation we observed. Thus, cells were treated with PTX and effects of GLP-1 on contraction were studied. We found that Gi inhibition by PTX pretreatment did not restore any positive inotropic effect of GLP-1 (Figure 2D), in contrast to that seen during ß2-adrenergic stimulation. In parallel experiments, the successful inactivation of PTX-sensitive G proteins was verified by a loss in the ability of acetylcholine to reverse the positive inotropic effect of the ß1-adrenoceptor (AR) agonist, ISO (not shown).
The likely explanation for the failure of GLP-1 to induce a positive contractile response despite its ability to increase cAMP levels may relate to some unique compartmentalization of GLP-1 receptor signaling compared with that of the ß-adrenergic system. Specifically, increased activity of highly localized phosphodiesterases (PDEs) or phosphatases controlling the "excitation-contraction apparatus" at the junctional diad involved in ß-adrenoceptormediated positive inotropy could prevent local cAMP increases and/or the activation by PKA phosphorylation of functional targets at these specific sites, eliminating the positive inotropic response (without apparently affecting total cAMP levels). Pharmacological inhibition of PDE and phosphatase activity was utilized to test these scenarios. Cells were treated with either the nonspecific PDE inhibitor IBMX (0.1 mmol/L) or the specific cGMP-stimulated PDE inhibitor erythro-9-(2-hydroxy-3-nonyl)adenine (EHNA, 30 µmol/L) (which has been shown to be capable of selectively preventing basal activation of the L-type calcium channel14) or with specific inhibitors of phosphatase types 1 and 2 (major phosphatase isoforms in cardiac muscle), calyculin A and okadaic acid, and the effect of GLP-1 on contraction amplitude was studied. Figure 3 shows the failure of either PDE or phosphatase inhibition to unmask GLP-1induced positive inotropy.
|
Effect of GLP-1 on pHi
The results shown in Figure 2B suggest that GLP-1 diminishes the myofilament Ca2+ responsiveness. Because pHi changes modulate myofilament Ca2+ responsiveness, the effect of GLP-1 (10 nmol/L) on pHi was compared with that of ISO (10 nmol/L) (Figure 4). Both GLP-1 (middle tracing) and ISO (lower tracing) induced a slowly evolving acidification of similar magnitude (0.09±0.02 and 0.08±0.03 pH units, respectively) and time course compared with control buffer (upper tracing). Figure 4B shows the average pHi changes observed after incubation for 20 minutes in control, ISO, GLP-1, or GLP-1 together with its competitive antagonist, Ex 9-39. ISO and GLP-1 induced acidifications of similar magnitude, and the GLP-1 effect was completely suppressed by Ex 9-39. Blocking the Na+-H+ exchanger (NHE) using HOE642 did not cause a significant acidosis (-0.03±0.02 pH units versus basal after 15-minute exposure to 1 µmol/L HOE642), nor did it affect the GLP-1induced acidification (not shown). If the GLP-1mediated increase in cAMP activates PKA and in turn causes the observed acidification and consequent reduced myofilament Ca2+ responsiveness and contraction amplitude, then using a specific cAMP antagonist should inhibit both of these phenomena. Experiments were performed using the cAMP analog, Rp-8-CPT-cAMPS, which effectively inhibits PKA-dependent processes.13 All cells were preincubated with 100 µmol/L Rp-8-CPT-cAMPS (at 37°C) for at least 1 hour before the experiment. Figure 5 shows that in the continued presence of Rp-8-CPT-cAMPS both the GLP-1induced intracellular acidosis and the negative contractile response were markedly inhibited, suggesting that these GLP-1induced phenomena are at least in part mediated by increased cAMP/PKA activation. Parallel experiments showed that Rp-8-CPT-cAMPS inhibited the ISO-induced positive inotropic effect and acidosis to a similar degree (not shown).
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Previous investigations provide evidence suggesting potential cardiovascular actions of GLP-1, affecting blood pressure and heart rate.15,16 However, because these studies were performed using in vivo models, it is uncertain whether these effects were of systemic origin (eg, the vasculature) or from direct actions of GLP-1 on the myocardium. To our knowledge, the present study is the first to investigate the direct effects of GLP-1 on cardiac myocyte contractile response.
The most compelling (and unexpected) finding of this study was that although GLP-1 demonstrates certain features of ß-AR stimulation (ie, major increases in cAMP and modest intracellular acidification [Figures 1 and 4]), it completely failed to induce any typical ß-adrenergic positive inotropy. Moreover, adding a ß-AR agonist (ISO) in the continuous presence of GLP-1 resulted in the development of a typical increase in CaT and contraction but without any apparent change in the total cAMP. Thus, there is no evidence of GLP-1 interfering with ß-AR function per se. Although a positive correlation between cAMP accumulation and enhanced inotropy (eg, see Dobson17) has been demonstrated, recent evidence indicates that the effectiveness of cAMP-elevating agents to enhance contractility varies considerably, although doses may be equipotent as far as increasing cAMP.1821 This suggests that discrete intracellular localization of mediator substances and proteins plays a crucial role in the regulation of myocardial contractility. Indeed, the idea of cAMP compartmentalization was first suggested by the complete dissociation of cAMP accumulation and cardiac functional response to prostaglandin E1 (PGE1). Buxton and Brunton22 showed a lack of inotropic response to PGE1 despite increases in cAMP comparable with those of ISO, whereas this latter agent produced a 2-fold increase in contractility. Moreover, Kaumann and Birnbaumer23 showed a small but consistent cAMP-dependent decrease in force of contraction induced by PGE1 in kitten papillary muscles.
Buxton and Brunton22 ascribed the functional dissociation between PGE1 and ISO to the capability of ISO to produce cAMP accumulation in both soluble and particulate compartments, whereas PGE1 activated only the soluble pool and had no effect on particulate cAMP or protein kinase. The similarity between GLP-1 and PGE1 to accumulate cAMP18 and decrease contractility,23 in addition to the ability of both these compounds to induce positive chronotropism,16,23 suggests that GLP-1 could have a mode of action similar to that of PGE1, that is, to selectively accumulate cAMP in certain microdomains, together with its functional exclusion from other microdomains, notably the excitation-contraction coupling apparatus.
Compartmentalization of G proteincoupled signaling has been the subject of numerous recent reports (see Steinberg and Brunton24 for recent review), and it is increasingly recognized that spatiotemporal regulation of PKA activity involves regulation of discrete cAMP pools. To activate PKA half-maximally, cAMP levels must achieve >70 nmol/L.25 Recent elegant micropipette studies concluded that if cAMP was not produced in diffusionally restricted microdomains, cAMP would not achieve levels sufficient to regulate PKA, even near AC.26 Furthermore, without such microdomains, cAMP would need to increase globally to activate PKA, even if this signal was only required in a discrete location. All PKA would become activated under these conditions, and discrete functional control would be lost. Finally, all of this cAMP would require hydrolysis (or extrusion) to return to the basal state, which would be both costly and slow compared with that needed under local control schemes.
There are recent demonstrations of discrete signaling compartmentalization in the cardiac myocyte, for example, comparing ß1- versus ß2-AR signaling,27,28 or the underlying nature of PKA signaling compartmentalized to the cardiac ryanodine receptor (RyR) 2.29 Regarding ß1-AR signaling, the cAMP that is produced is diffusive through the cytosol and enhances not only local L-type Ca2+ channel activity, but also increases phosphorylation of phospholamban, troponin I, and C protein, causing accelerated muscle relaxation and reduced Ca2+-myofilament sensitivity. In contrast, ß2-AR signaling (via cAMP) is localized to the plasmalemma (selectively enhancing local L-type Ca2+ channel activity) and thus completely fails to affect phospholamban, troponin I, or C protein, so relaxant effects are not observed. This difference results from differential G protein coupling of these ß-ARs (ß1-AR to Gs only, whereas ß2-AR to both Gs and Gi),30 and from differential ß-adrenoceptor subtype targeting between intracellular and surface membrane compartments as well as between caveolar and noncaveolar membrane compartments.28
We have investigated several mechanisms potentially responsible for different patterns of cAMP compartmentalization that could contribute to the different effects of GLP-1 and ISO. This could be the result of differences in the local control of cAMP microdomains via increased activity of highly localized PDEs and/or phosphatases that may fully consume cAMP or promote dephosphorylation, and prevent PKA activation, respectively, in the immediate vicinity of specific functional targets, such as the L-type calcium channel and the sarcoplasmic reticulum. PDE2 appears functionally localized to the L-type Ca2+ channel and prevents the cAMP/PKA-dependent activation of the basal calcium current in human atrial myocytes.14 However, inhibition of PDEs using either the PDE-nonspecific31 or PDE2-specific32 PDE inhibitors, IBMX or EHNA, respectively, did not unmask an "ISO-like" positive inotropic response to GLP-1. It is also possible that GLP-1 activates a parallel inhibitory pathway, which hinders the translocation of PKA, increases the availability of the heat-stable inhibitor of protein kinase, or promotes dephosphorylation (via increased phosphatase activity) of PKA-target proteins. If any of these mechanisms were true, then GLP-1 might be expected to prevent the contractile effects of ISO. However, GLP-1 does not inhibit any of the contractile effects of ISO (Figure 2C). Notably, a similar finding was obtained by Buxton and Brunton22 when comparing PGE1 and ISO.
Muscarinic M2 receptors, as well as adenosine A1 receptors, counteract the effect of PKA, in part via activation of phosphatases.33 Protein phosphatases, type 1 (PP1) and type 2 (PP2), regulate PKA-dependent L-type channel activity and are localized in close proximity to the channel.34 A similar mechanism limiting the ß2-adrenergic contractile response has recently been suggested.30 Subcellular targeting of PKA and PP2B regulates GLP-1mediated insulin secretion in pancreatic ß cells.35 Thus, effectors of the excitation-contraction apparatus might be guarded against GLP-1induced PKA phosphorylation and activation by increased phosphatase activity. However, inhibition of phosphatases using either of the PP1- and PP2-specific inhibitors, calyculin A or okadaic acid, did not unmask a positive inotropic effect of GLP-1 (Figure 3).
Because the GLP-1 receptor, like the ß-AR, belongs to the family of G proteincoupled receptors,2 we examined whether differences between GLP-1 and ISO could relate to differences in G protein coupling, comparable with that between ß1- and ß2-adrenoceptors. Although native expression of the GLP-1 receptor (in pancreatic ß cells) is primarily coupled to the AC pathway via activation of Gs
, receptor overexpression studies in Chinese hamster ovary cells found coupling to Gq/11
and, to a certain extent, Gi3
.36 However, the inhibition of Gi via PTX treatment did not unmask an underlying positive inotropic response of GLP-1 (Figure 2D).
Other scenarios, which we did not probe but which deserve future attention, involve the targeting of GLP-1activated PKA via A-kinase-anchoring proteins (AKAPs) to sites excluded from the excitation-contraction compartment. AKAPs have been localized to a host of different subcellular compartments, including mitochondria, nuclear matrix, endoplasmic reticulum, and plasma membrane (where it modulates L-type Ca2+ channel activity) (reviewed in Schillace and Scott37). Subcellular targeting of PKA through association with AKAPs facilitates GLP-1mediated insulin secretion from pancreatic islets.38 AKAP-mediated signaling compartmentalization has also been recognized in cardiac myocytes. Control of RyR2 by cAMP/PKA signaling is locally restricted to the junctional diad by a macromolecular complex comprising RyR2, FKBP12.6, PKA, PP1 and PP2A, and murine AKAP.29 Furthermore, disruption of AKAP-mediated PKA anchoring was found to alter the ß-adrenoceptorstimulated contractile response in cardiac myocytes.39
Another important insight from this study is that apparently infinitesimal changes of total cAMP, likely localized to specialized signaling microdomains, seem to be sufficient to elicit the entire functional range of ß-adrenergic activation. This can be deduced from the fact that GLP-1, ISO, and GLP-1+ISO produced essentially equivalent increases in whole-cell cAMP, across which the entire contractile range of ß-adrenoceptor stimulation could be observed. The absence of any measurable cAMP increase with ISO+GLP-1, versus either agent alone is not a trivial result of having achieved maximal AC activation (Figure 1). Receptor-coupled AC activity was not maximal in the presence of either 10 nmol/L GLP-1 or ISO. Because cAMP production was not additive even at 1 nmol/L ISO+GLP-1 (Figure 1A, inset), we speculate that GLP-1 and ß-adrenergic receptors couple to the same AC population outside of the junctional diad. However, we assume that the "restored" CaT response on ISO addition to GLP-1 (Figure 2) is mediated by cAMP microdomains at the junctional diad 15-nm cleft modulated selectively by ß-AR agents, but not by GLP-1. Because this microdomain is extremely small versus the whole-cell domain, cAMP changes in only this compartment would be virtually unresolvable by conventional whole-cell measurements. Because contractile-modulatory effects of GLP-1 could not be unmasked by PDE or phosphatase inhibition, we speculate that the GLP-1 receptors are absent from the junctional diad. These issues remain for future investigations.
In rat cardiac myocytes, GLP-1 increased cAMP and induced a slowly evolving negative inotropic effect. This effect developed without changes in the CaT suggesting a reduction in myofilament Ca2+ responsiveness, which could relate to several different mechanisms including altered pHi, whereby acidosis decreases and alkalosis increases myofilament Ca2+ responsiveness.40 That the GLP-1induced negative inotropic effect is associated with an acidification that develops over a parallel time course, and, more importantly, that the inhibitory cAMP-analog, Rp-8-CPT-cAMPs, attenuates both the GLP-1induced negative inotropic effect and the intracellular acidification to similar proportions, indicates that the GLP-1induced negative inotropic effect is determined, at least in part, by a cAMP/PKA-dependent acidosis that mediates the reduction in myofilament Ca2+ responsiveness. Furthermore, we have shown that a comparable degree of acidosis (produced during the washout of NH4Cl) causes a negative contractile effect similar to the present results.41 However, our results do not rule out the possibility that the GLP-1induced reduction in myofilament responsiveness could still be mediated via other mechanisms in addition to pHi, such as by PKA-induced changes in myofilament regulation, for example, by troponin I phosphorylation.
Another interesting finding of this study is that ß-adrenoceptor stimulation with ISO induces an acidification with a similar time course and to the same degree as GLP-1. In contrast to GLP-1, however, the coincident small negative inotropic effect resulting from ß1-induced acidification is more than offset by its overwhelming positive inotropic effects. In the case of both GLP-1 and ISO, cAMP-dependent acidification could result from changes in NHE activity or mitochondrial metabolism, or via enhancement in glycolysis. We are aware of only one other report42 showing a ß1-adrenoceptormediated intracellular acidosis. Shida et al42 demonstrated that ß1-stimulated acidification could be blocked by either of the two glycolysis inhibitors, 2-deoxyglucose or iodoacetate, but not by the NHE or anion exchanger blockers, amiloride and DIDS, respectively, concluding that ß1-adrenoceptor stimulation causes acidification via enhancement of glycolysis.
In cardiac myocytes pHi is regulated by four primary membrane transporters, as follows: NHE and Na+HCO3- cotransport (NBC) which mediate acid efflux, whereas Cl-HCO3- exchange (AE) and Cl-OH--exchange (CHE) mediate acid influx. Because the present experiments are performed in HEPES buffer, HCO3- levels and, hence, NBC and AE activities, are negligible. Not surprisingly, acid influx due to CHE is very low at and below normal resting pHi levels and is negligible at pHi 6.95,43 so it is unlikely to be responsible for acidosis in the present experiments. Even if CHE were somehow activated during ß-AR or GLP-1 receptor stimulation by a previously unknown cAMP/PKA-dependent mechanism, still NHE would be more than capable to substantially compensate and blunt the acidosis. NHE1 is ubiquitously distributed and is the primary NHE subtype found in the mammalian cardiac cell, accounting for
60% of H+ removal capability.44 Of the five presently known NHE isoforms found in the plasma membrane of mammalian cells, cardiac cells lack all but NHE1. Intracellular acidosis is the major stimulus for NHE1 activation, although additional regulation occurs largely via phosphorylation reactions in response to hormones, autocrine/paracrine factors, and mechanical stimuli. PKA and protein kinase C stimulate transport by NHE1.45 Given the activation of NHE1 by PKA, it is even more unlikely that some unforeseen activation of CHE would be able to explain the acidosis in the present experiments. Furthermore, the NHE blocker, HOE642, by itself did not cause any significant acidosis, nor did it block the development of GLP-1mediated acidosis. Thus, the GLP-1/PKA-mediated acidosis is unlikely to be caused by regulation of the sarcolemmal H+ transporters, but rather is more likely due to an underlying change in metabolism (such as by an increased metabolic acid production due to enhanced glycolysis and/or alteration in mitochondrial metabolism).
In summary, the failure of the GLP-1mediated increase in cAMP to induce a typical ß-adrenergic pattern of contractile augmentation suggests the existence of a novel pathway causing both functional localization of cAMP/PKA signaling possibly to the myofibrillar, mitochondrial, and/or nuclear compartments together with its functional exclusion from Ca2+induced Ca2+-release apparatus. This novel receptor/AC/cAMP/PKA compartmentalization is not the result of PTX-sensitive G proteins, nor of enhanced local PDE-activation, nor of localized phosphatase activation. Cardiac GLP-1 receptor stimulation also induces a cAMP/PKA-dependent acidification together with a parallel decrease in myofilament responsiveness to Ca2+ resulting in a modest negative inotropic effect. Given the roles played by cAMP signaling beyond that involved in contractility, these findings could have significant implications for GLP-1 modulation of cardiac metabolism, growth, and potentially for the regulation of survival and apoptosis,46,47 suggesting the need for further investigations.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received January 23, 2001; accepted July 9, 2001.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Ban, M. H. Noyan-Ashraf, J. Hoefer, S.-S. Bolz, D. J. Drucker, and M. Husain Cardioprotective and Vasodilatory Actions of Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Are Mediated Through Both Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor-Dependent and -Independent Pathways Circulation, May 6, 2008; 117(18): 2340 - 2350. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Holst The Physiology of Glucagon-like Peptide 1 Physiol Rev, October 1, 2007; 87(4): 1409 - 1439. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. L. Sowden, D. J. Drucker, D. Weinshenker, and S. J. Swoap Oxyntomodulin increases intrinsic heart rate in mice independent of the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, February 1, 2007; 292(2): R962 - R970. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Fischmeister, L. R.V. Castro, A. Abi-Gerges, F. Rochais, J. Jurevicius, J. Leroy, and G. Vandecasteele Compartmentation of Cyclic Nucleotide Signaling in the Heart: The Role of Cyclic Nucleotide Phosphodiesterases Circ. Res., October 13, 2006; 99(8): 816 - 828. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Pongratz, J. W. McAlees, D. H. Conrad, R. S. Erbe, K. M. Haas, and V. M. Sanders The Level of IgE Produced by a B Cell Is Regulated by Norepinephrine in a p38 MAPK- and CD23-Dependent Manner. J. Immunol., September 1, 2006; 177(5): 2926 - 2938. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. A. Piggott, K. A. Hassell, Z. Berkova, A. P. Morris, M. Silberbach, and T. C. Rich Natriuretic Peptides and Nitric Oxide Stimulate cGMP Synthesis in Different Cellular Compartments J. Gen. Physiol., June 26, 2006; 128(1): 3 - 14. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Zhao, P. Parikh, S. Bhashyam, H. Bolukoglu, I. Poornima, Y.-T. Shen, and R. P. Shannon Direct Effects of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 on Myocardial Contractility and Glucose Uptake in Normal and Postischemic Isolated Rat Hearts J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 2006; 317(3): 1106 - 1113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Gardiner, J. E. March, P. A. Kemp, and T. Bennett Mesenteric Vasoconstriction and Hindquarters Vasodilatation Accompany the Pressor Actions of Exendin-4 in Conscious Rats J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., February 1, 2006; 316(2): 852 - 859. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. K. Bose, M. M. Mocanu, R. D. Carr, C. L. Brand, and D. M. Yellon Glucagon-like Peptide 1 Can Directly Protect the Heart Against Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury Diabetes, January 1, 2005; 54(1): 146 - 151. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. A. Nikolaidis, A. Doverspike, T. Hentosz, L. Zourelias, Y.-T. Shen, D. Elahi, and R. P. Shannon Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Limits Myocardial Stunning following Brief Coronary Occlusion and Reperfusion in Conscious Canines J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., January 1, 2005; 312(1): 303 - 308. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Rochais, G. Vandecasteele, F. Lefebvre, C. Lugnier, H. Lum, J.-L. Mazet, D. M. F. Cooper, and R. Fischmeister Negative Feedback Exerted by cAMP-dependent Protein Kinase and cAMP Phosphodiesterase on Subsarcolemmal cAMP Signals in Intact Cardiac Myocytes: AN IN VIVO STUDY USING ADENOVIRUS-MEDIATED EXPRESSION OF CNG CHANNELS J. Biol. Chem., December 10, 2004; 279(50): 52095 - 52105. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. A. Nikolaidis, D. Elahi, T. Hentosz, A. Doverspike, R. Huerbin, L. Zourelias, C. Stolarski, Y.-t. Shen, and R. P. Shannon Recombinant Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Increases Myocardial Glucose Uptake and Improves Left Ventricular Performance in Conscious Dogs With Pacing-Induced Dilated Cardiomyopathy Circulation, August 24, 2004; 110(8): 955 - 961. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A Movsesian Altered cAMP-mediated signalling and its role in the pathogenesis of dilated cardiomyopathy Cardiovasc Res, June 1, 2004; 62(3): 450 - 459. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Saucerman, L. L. Brunton, A. P. Michailova, and A. D. McCulloch Modeling {beta}-Adrenergic Control of Cardiac Myocyte Contractility in Silico J. Biol. Chem., November 28, 2003; 278(48): 47997 - 48003. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Lohse, S. Engelhardt, and T. Eschenhagen What Is the Role of {beta}-Adrenergic Signaling in Heart Failure? Circ. Res., November 14, 2003; 93(10): 896 - 906. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. GEORGET, P. MATEO, G. VANDECASTEELE, L. LIPSKAIA, N. DEFER, J. HANOUNE, J. HOERTER, C. LUGNIER, and R. FISCHMEISTER Cyclic AMP compartmentation due to increased cAMP-phosphodiesterase activity in transgenic mice with a cardiac-directed expression of the human adenylyl cyclase type 8 (AC8) FASEB J, August 1, 2003; 17(11): 1380 - 1391. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Gros, X. You, L. L. Baggio, M. G. Kabir, A. M. Sadi, I. N. Mungrue, T. G. Parker, Q. Huang, D. J. Drucker, and M. Husain Cardiac Function in Mice Lacking the Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Endocrinology, June 1, 2003; 144(6): 2242 - 2252. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Kapiloff Contributions of Protein Kinase A Anchoring Proteins to Compartmentation of cAMP Signaling in the Heart Mol. Pharmacol., August 1, 2002; 62(2): 193 - 199. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Lohse and S. Engelhardt Protein Kinase A Transgenes: The Many F |