UltraRapid Communication |
From the Departments of Physiology (A.J.B., U.S., A.R.) and Pharmacology (D.M.), Centre Médical Universitaire, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland; Department of Pharmacology (E.S.L.), University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa; and Center of Electron Microscopy (S.F.), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Correspondence to Dr Alex J. Baertschi, Physiology, CMU, 1 Rue Michel-Servet, 1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland. E-mail alex.baertschi{at}medecine.unige.ch
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
gln23,24) change size and shapebut not velocityof the vesicles, and, strikingly, abolish their docking at the plasma membrane. The shapes thus change from spheres to larger, irregular floppy bags or vesicle trains. Deletion of the C-terminal proANP[45-127], where the ANP and its disulfide bond reside, does not change size, shape, docking, or velocity of the mobile vesicles. The N-terminal acid calcium-binding sequence of proANP is known to cause protein aggregation at the high calcium concentration prevailing in the trans-Golgi network. Therefore, these results indicate that amino acid residues favoring cargo aggregation are critically important in shaping the secretory vesicles and determining their fatedocking or not dockingat the plasma membrane. The full text of this article is available at http://www.circresaha.org.
Key Words: atrium enhanced green fluorescent protein in vivo imaging proatrial natriuretic peptide secretory vesicles
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Calcium-dependent condensation of prohormone has been shown for proANP7 and the progranins.8 Mutations of the acid N-terminal of proANP that abolish calcium binding also abolish proANP secretion from transfected AtT-20 cells.9 The defect in secretion was ascribed to a lack of vesicle genesis, although the absence of vesicles has not yet been verified. In the case of the progranins, an N-terminal disulfide-bonded loop was shown to be essential for calcium-dependent aggregation and sorting to regulated secretory vesicles in PC12 cells.8 Interestingly, an acidic amino acid sequence of N-terminal proopiomelanocortin, stabilized by a disulfide bond, is essential for observing a punctate, granule-like staining pattern in transfected Neuro-2a cells,10 although aggregating properties have not yet been identified.
How do the vesicles form? Surface motifs of the prohormone aggregate may recruit lipids and proteins within the membrane of the trans-Golgi network, thereby enwrapping the aggregate and reducing the energy required for pinching off the secretory vesicle budding off the trans-Golgi network.8,1115 This attractive concept implies that cargo signals determine size and possibly shape of secretory vesicles, but direct evidence is lacking in the tumor cell lines used in those studies, and there is no study at all on live cardiomyocytes. Furthermore, it is unknown whether cargo signals may recruit transmembrane molecules essential for vesicle docking or fusion, although there is evidence that vesicle-associated transmembrane proteins (v-SNARES) will dock the vesicle at a subplasmalemmal protein scaffold.1618 The present study addresses these questions on primary cultured atrial myocytes, by visualizing fusion proteins of mutated proANP with enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) within moving and docked secretory vesicles. Although atrial myocytes present several technical difficulties, they have the advantage of providing a well-differentiated phenotype with mature secretory vesicles carrying uncleaved prohormone to the docking sites.4,5 This study identifies the calcium-binding amino acid sequence in proANP as a crucial cargo signal for shaping spherical secretory vesicles of well-defined size. The study also shows that a change in shape to larger floppy vesicles associates with failure of docking at the plasma membrane.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
HL-1 Cell Line
This mouse atrial tumor cell line21 was reconstituted, split, cultured, and frozen exactly as described in the detailed protocol entitled Care and Feeding of HL-1 Cells (W.C. Claycomb, personal communication, 1998). For Western blots, the cells were plated at medium density and cultured for 2 days in 6-well fibronectin-coated culture plates. For imaging, cells were seeded at low density and cultured for 1 to 2 days on 22-mm fibronectin-coated glass slides. HL-1 cells were transfected with TransFast reagent (Promega).
Plasmid Constructs
Figure 1 (top left) shows a schematic representation of the different fusion proteins of this study. All the plasmid constructs were verified by restriction analysis and DNA sequencing in the coding regions. The pcDNA3-EGFP expression vector was obtained by cloning the full-length EGFP cDNA (pEGFP-1, Clontech) into the pcDNA3 vector from Invitrogen Inc. The pcDNA3-flag-EGFP vector was kindly provided by Philippe Halban (Louis Jeantet Laboratory, Centre Médical Universitaire, Geneva, Switzerland). It is derived from pcDNA3-EGFP containing a sequence flag coding for 9 amino acids (MDYKDDDDK) in frame with the EGFP initiation site. The pcDNA3-signal peptide-proANP[1-11]-flag-EGFP expression vector encodes a chimeric protein composed of a short preproANP sequence encoding the first 35 amino acids, with the 24 amino acid signal peptide (SP), linked in frame to the flag-EGFP cDNA. The short preproANP fragment was amplified by polymerase chain reaction(PCR) from a pGEM1-preproANP vector (K.R. Chien, University of California at San Diego, San Diego, Calif). The plasmid for preproANP[1-11]-flag-EGFP-proANP[9-127] was generated using two cloning vectors as templates, pEGFP-C1-proANP and pcDNA3-signal peptide-proANP[1-11]-flag-EGFP. In a first step, we cloned a PCR fragment encoding a peptide from amino acids 9 to 127 of proANP into an XhoI site in the pEGFP-C1 vector (Clontech). We then amplified the signal peptide-proANP[1-11]-flag-EGFP fragment from pcDNA3-signal peptide-proANP[1-11]-flag-EGFP vector and cloned it into the pEGFP-C1-proANP vector from which the EGFP cDNA had been previously excised. The preproANP-2aa-EGFP vector encodes a fusion protein where EGFP is attached by a two amino acid spacer (-GS-) to the C-terminal of rat preproANP. We performed two independent PCR reactions to amplify separately preproANP and EGFP full-length cDNAs. These fragments were fused together in an orientated manner, and the fused product was amplified by overlap extension PCR. The preproANP-10aa-EGFP vector encodes a preproANP-EGFP fusion protein interrupted by a 10 amino acid spacer (-GPGINPPVAT-) and was successfully expressed in secretory granules of PC-12 cells.22 The cDNA was cloned into pEGFP-N1. Except for the longer spacer, the coding sequence is identical to preproANP-2aa-EGFP. The preproANP[45-127]-10aa-EGFP vector was designed to delete the N-terminal amino acids 1 to 44 of proANP, corresponding to the acidic calcium-binding domain9 from the preproANP-10aa-EGFP fusion protein. The technique used was an overlap extension PCR. The preproANP[glu23,24
gln23,24)-10aa-EGFP vector was built by taking the preproANP-10aa-EGFP construct as a template for PCR-based site-directed mutagenesis. The primers for introducing the mutations were taken from Canaff et al9 according to protocols of G. Thibault (Clinical Research Institute, Montréal, Quebec, Canada). The vector expressing the C-terminaldeleted mutant preproANP[1-44]-10aa-EGFP was constructed by a PCR-based strategy using the vector encoding preproANP-10aa-EGFP as template.
Western Blots
Twenty-four hours after transfection the HL-1 cultures were rinsed with HEPES buffer at 37°C, lysed, and sonicated. The extract was resolved on a 15% Acryl/Bisacrylamide-SDS gel for 2 hours at 100 V. The proteins were then transferred onto a nylon membrane (Millipore), and nonspecific sites were blocked. The membrane was incubated overnight at 4°C with polyclonal rabbit anti-EGFP antibody (Clontech, 1:4000), then for 1 hour at room temperature with HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (BioRad, 1:3000), and the EGFP bands were detected with the enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) kit (Amersham).
Microinjection and Electroporation
Similar to protocols of K. Ballmer-Hofer (Friedrich Miescher Institute, Basel, Switzerland), chimeric DNA (1 mg/mL; 3 µL) was added to 9.5 µL of autoclaved buffer and filtered through a Millipore 0.1-µm Ultrafree-MC centrifuge filter. An Eppendorf micropipette containing the DNA was connected to a 5171 micro-manipulator and 5246 transjector pressure control unit (Eppendorf) (holding pressure 80 hPa, injection pressure 60 hPa, and nuclear microinjection >300 ms). Up to 100 microinjections per dish were performed within 30 minutes at room temperature in HEPES buffer containing (in mmol/L) KCl 5, CaCl2 1, MgCl2 1, NaCl 118, glucose 2.5, HEPES 10; NaOH to pH 7.3, and sucrose to 290 mosm/kg H2O. Cells were usually examined 16 to 22 hours after microinjection. Success rates ranged from 0% to 3%. Electroporation (Gene Pulser II, Bio-Rad) yielded larger numbers of fluorescent myocytes per week. For each electroporation, 400 000 myocytes were suspended in PBS mixed with 4 to 8 µg of cDNA in a cuvette (4-mm electrode gap), and subjected to a 200-V shock (resistance 200 or 600
, capacitance 800 µF). The cells were immediately plated in culture medium and returned to the incubator.
In Vivo Cell Labeling and Immunostaining
cDNA encoding the human transferrin receptor (V. Gerke, University of Munster, Munster, Germany) was co-microinjected in some cases, and cells were labeled 24 hours later by tetramethyl-rhodamineconjugated human transferrin (Molecular Probes) using a standard rhodamine filter cube (Nikon). Other labels (all from Molecular Probes) included Mito Tracker Red, Syto-17, and Alexa 594 phalloidin. The cells were fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde and stored in ice-cold PBS. Cultures were pretreated with 1% normal serum, and the following primary antibodies were applied (4 days at 4°C): rabbit anti-rat ANP antiserum (IHC 9103, Peninsula Europe, Petersborough, UK) (dilution 1:1000), mouse anti-TGN38 monoclonal (ABR-MA3-063-R100, dilution 1:1000, Alexis Corp), and mouse monoclonal anti-GFP gamma globulin (dilution 1:1000, Clontech). After repeated treatment with 1% normal serum, we detected the primary antibodies with Texas Red-X or Alexa 594labeled goat anti-rabbit or anti-mouse gamma globulin (Molecular Probes, 1:200 or 1:400). Separation of green and red fluorescence was achieved using Nikon filter cubes: green fluorescence, monochromatic excitation at 480±6 nm, dichroic mirror 495 nm, emission filter 515±15 nm; red fluorescence, monochromatic excitation at 575±6 nm, dichroic mirror 595 nm, emission filter 630±30 nm. Controls included application of preimmune serum, no primary antibody, or preincubation of primary antibody with antigen.
Electron Microscopic Procedures
Cells on Cellocate coverslips (Eppendorf) were fixed in 1.6% glutaraldehyde followed by 2% OsO4 postfixation. The specimens were then dehydrated in ethanol and embedded in Epon according to a standard procedure. For immunocytochemistry, cells on Cellocate-microgridded coverslips were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, washed, dehydrated in ascending concentrations of ethanol, and embedded in situ into LR White resin. After heat polymerization, the embedded cells were separated from the coverslips, and ultrathin sections were prepared (Leica Ultracut UCT). The sections were mounted on Formvar/carbon-coated nickel grids and processed, with minor changes, for postembedding immunogold labeling as previously described.23 Briefly, the grids with sections were pretreated with 1% normal goat serum, reacted for 17 hours with anti-GFP mouse monoclonal antibody (Clontech, diluted 1:300 or 1:500), and with a colloidal gold-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG+IgM complex (particle size 12 nm). As controls, nonelectroporated cells or cells electroporated without DNA were processed for immunolabeling in parallel, and cells from all samples were incubated in the absence of anti-GFP antibody. All preparations were stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate, air-dried, and observed in a Philips CM 10 electron microscope at 80 kV using a 30- to 40-µm objective aperture.
Imaging Protocols
Cells were electroporated on day 1 or microinjected on days 2 or 3 of culture. Between 16 to 50 hours after the DNA transfer, a green fluorescencepositive coverslip was placed in a specially designed chamber in HEPES buffer, and fluorescent myocytes were tagged by diamond-engraving the bottom of the slide. The chamber was then placed on a temperature-controlled (30°C to 35°C) stage of a wide-field Nikon DV200 Diaphot inverted microscope, and x-y coordinates for all tagged cells were determined for easy identification. After the image acquisitions, the cells were fixed and stored in PBS and darkness at 4°C. After immunolabeling and nuclear staining, the coverslip was placed again at a similar orientation on the setup for acquiring double z-scans of these cells.
Image Acquisition
A xenon lamp of a PTI DeltaRam monochromator illuminated the preparation at 480 or 575 nm (±6-nm bandwidth), using appropriate filter cubes (see Immunolabeling), a x100 oil fluorescence objective (NA=1.3), and exposure times of usually 500 ms (range 200 to 2000 ms). Two-color imaging was performed on live cells (EGFP and, eg, Mito Tracker Red) or fixed cells (EGFP and, eg, TGN-38). Black-and-white images (16-bit) were obtained with a quantum efficiency of 80% by a back-illuminated Princeton Instruments charge-coupled device (CCD) camera (TE/CCD-1000TKB, Visitron Systems). At x100 magnification, each pixel corresponds to a 150x150-nm square. For repeated z-scans, 40 to 80 optical sections were obtained at 150- or 200-nm steps. For time-lapse studies, the preparation was repeatedly illuminated at intervals of 1 to 15 seconds for up to 60 minutes. The z-scan image stacks were dehazed using Huygens deconvolution software (Bitplane) by the iterative constrained Tikhonov-Miller procedure. The deconvoluted stacks were superposed in false colors: green for EGFP; red for TGN-38 or ANP (MetaMorph, Universal Imaging Corp).
Measurement of Vesicle Parameters
Exactly the same analysis was applied to all fusion proteins. Vesicles in time-lapse images were zoomed twice 8 times (using edit-duplicate stack with zoom function, MetaMorph). For calibration purposes, green microspheres (Molecular Probes) with a diameter of 175 nm were imaged and analyzed the same way as the vesicles in live cells. As expected, the fluorescence intensity in the x-y plane is contained, after deconvolution, in a 2x2 pixel square (300x300 nm). Without deconvolution, the microspheres appear as a sphere of at least 750 nm in diameter. The emitted light thus diffuses over at least 25 pixels, with 58.6±0.3% (n=7 microspheres) of the total fluorescence appearing at optimal focus over a 3x3 pixel square. Accordingly, vesicle sizes in live myocytes were estimatedindependently of shapeby counting, at optimal focus, the number of pixels in the x-y plane accounting for 60% of the total fluorescence intensity. For example, a small round vesicle may diffuse its light over
16 pixels and contain 60% of the fluorescence within a 2x2 pixel square. Vesicle shapes were classified as spheroid, when 60% of the fluorescence intensity was spread over a square, as ovoid when 60% was spread over a rectangular area, and as irregular when 60% was spread over an obviously irregularly shaped area. Vesicle top velocity was measured by tracking the vesicle over its entire route. The fluorescence intensity of the vesicle was characterized by measuring the top pixel intensity (in CCD units) and normalized per 500 ms of exposure time. By calibration with precipitated GFP, it was estimated that 1 CCD unit per voxel corresponds to 150 fluorescent molecules. Constitutive vesicles containing uncondensed GFP would be >100 times less fluorescent, thus far below the threshold of detection. Docking of vesicles was attributed to peripheral vesicles remaining immobile at the cell surface over the total recording period.
Statistics
Expression of 9 fusion proteins was studied in 137 atrial myocytes. Five types of fusion proteins were expressed in mobile vesicles (Figures 3 and 4). A total of 245 vesicles in 32 atrial myocytes with fluorescent intensities >7 CCD units were chosen for detailed analysis of size, shape, velocity, and intensity of the vesicles. A total of 422 vesicles (regardless of intensity) were counted as either docked or moving in the periphery of these 32 cells. Results were displayed as histograms. Statistically significant differences of distributions were analyzed by the
2 test.
|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Expression of EGFP in Mobile Vesicles Requires Signal Peptide and Part of proANP
EGFP, or EGFP fused to the acidic flag peptide MDYKDDDDK, is expressed in cytoplasm and nucleus of primary cultured rat atrial myocytes (Figures 1a and 1b). ProANP fused via a long linker, GPGINPPVAT, to EGFP and preceded by the signal peptide is efficiently directed into mobile vesicles of HL-1 cells (Figure 1c) as well as of primary cultured atrial (Figure 1d) and ventricular myocytes (Figure 1e). In atrial myocytes expressing proANP-10aa-EGFP, immunoelectron microscopy for EGFP specifically labels electron-dense vesicles of
180 nm in diameter identified as secretory granules2 (Figure 2). No green fluorescence is detected in mitochondria or endosomes (not shown). Strong expression of green fluorescence also occurs in the perinuclear area that immunostains for TGN-38 (a trans-Golgi network marker) (atrial myocyte, Figure 1d) and ANP (ventricular myocyte, Figure 1e). The presence of a signal peptide is necessary but not sufficient for expression of proteins in mobile vesicles. Reducing the linker to two amino acids causes missorting of proANP-EGFP to the cytoplasm and the nucleus (not shown), presumably because of misfolding of proANP due to the narrow intermolecular distance between proANP and EGFP. The fusion protein proANP[1-11]-flag-EGFP, preceded by the signal peptide, is not sorted to secretory vesicles, but remains in the perinuclear area (atrial myocyte, Figure 1f). However, deletion of C-terminal or N-terminal proANP sequences, mutations of N-terminal Glu to Gln in positions 23 and 24, or permutation of proANP and EGFP (see Figure 1, top) does not preclude expression in mobile vesicles (Figures 3 and 4).
|
|
Cargo Signals Determine Vesicle Size, Shape, and Docking
The key observations are that mutations of N-terminal proANP change the size (Figures 3b1 and 3c1) and shape (Figures 3b2, 3c2, 4b, and 4c) of putative secretory vesicles and abolish their docking at the plasma membrane (Figures 3b3 and 3c3) in atrial myocytes. Size histograms, established by tracking the mobile fluorescent vesicles containing proANP-10aa-EGFP, suggest the presence of smaller and larger vesicles, with apparent cross-sectional area (containing 60% of the fluorescence) of 2x2 and 3x3 pixels (Figure 3a1). From calibrations with the green fluorescent microspheres, the vesicle diameters are deduced to be
120 and 175 nm, respectively. Smaller and larger mobile vesicles can be observed in the time-lapse studies (for example, see time-lapse 1 in the online data supplement available at http://www.circresaha.org). Docked vesicles also display smaller and larger sizes (for example, see time-lapse 2 in the online data supplement available at http://www.circresaha.org). The size histograms are preserved for vesicles containing the C-terminaldeleted proANP (Figure 3d1) or proANP preceded by EGFP (Figure 3e1) but are shifted to significantly larger sizes when the N-terminal of proANP is deleted (Figure 3b1,
2=32.92, df=3, P<0.001) or mutated (Figure 3c1,
2=10.09, df=3, P<0.02). The mobile vesicles containing N-terminaldeleted or mutated proANP lose their spherical shape and display concave surfacesor even vesicle trains (Figure 4b3)and a floppy appearance in time-lapse studies (Figures 3b2 and 3c2;
2>88, df=2, P<0.001; Figures 4b and 4c). Strikingly, these floppy vesicles or vesicle trains do not dock (Figures 3b3 and 3c3,
2>12, df=1, P<0.001), and continuously zip through the cell along well-defined tracks (for example, see time-lapse 3 in the online data supplement available at http://www.circresaha.org). Experiments, repeated in HL-1 cells expressing the proteins shown in Figures 3a, 3b, and 3d, yield similar results (not shown).
The top velocity reached by the vesicles (0.298±0.019 µm/s, n=245 vesicles) is affected neither by their shape nor by their content (compare Figures 3b4, 3c4, 3d4, and 3e4;
2<1.15, df=3, P>0.80). The slightly higher velocities shown in Figure 3a4 are due to the presence of a larger proportion of faster-moving peripheral vesicles versus slower-moving perinuclear vesicles (results not shown). Top velocity is not correlated with fluorescence intensity (r=0.064, P>0.3) nor related to vesicle size (
2<7.4, df=6, P>0.3). This probably reflects an intrinsic property of the vesicle membrane and its interaction with vesicle motors.24
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Expression of GFP in Secretory Vesicles
This is the first imaging study of secretory vesicles in live cardiac myocytes. Western blots indicate that the fusion proteins remain intact, thus EGFP faithfully reports the presence of proANP or its mutated forms. The immunoelectron microscopy indicates that the EGFP, and thus the fused proANP, is localized in the secretory granules. The time resolution and sensitivity of the image acquisition are sufficient for tracking the vesicles up to once per second and for obtaining accurate estimates of their velocity. As shown with calibrated fluorescent microspheres, estimates of their size and shape can also be obtained.
This study shows both smaller and larger fluorescent mobile vesicles, with estimated sizes (
120 and 175 nm in diameter) comparable to those of secretory granules in electron micrographs (eg, Reference 2). Smaller and larger vesicles with both high and low fluorescence intensity are observed, indicating that light intensity per se could not have been responsible for detecting two types of mobile vesicles. Both types are also present with two other expression vectors, one coding for a C-terminaldeleted proANP, the other for proANP[9-127] preceded by proANP[1-11]-flag-EGFP. The common feature is the presence of proANP[9-44], the acidic N-terminal amino acid sequence.
Genesis of Floppy Vesicles Expressing N-TerminalMutated proANP
Floppy vesicles were discovered in the myocytes expressing the N-terminalmutated proANP. These vesicles are characterized by a strongly fluorescent core surrounded by a weakly fluorescent bag of time-varying shape. One simple interpretation is that normally folded, endogenously produced proANP entraps and condenses the mutated fusion proteins in the central core, and that uncondensed mutated fusion protein is diluted in a fluid phase surrounding the central core. Hitchhiking of mutated prohormone with endogenously produced intact prohormone has previously been described for the granins.8 This concept is consistent with the finding that the histograms for vesicle sizes are shifted to larger diameters. There is a loss of a distinct size of the vesicles, possibly because of varying amounts of fluid trapped during their genesis in the trans-Golgi network.
Model Linking Shape and Docking of Atrial Secretory Vesicles to Cargo Signals
The most striking feature of this work is the failure of floppy vesicles to dock at the plasma membrane. As a hypothesis, we propose a simple biophysical model that links the docking of secretory vesicles to the calcium-dependent condensation of its cargo (Figure 5). Normally folded prohormone aggregates in a dense matrix and is enwrapped in the trans-Golgi network by a tight-fitting membrane by recruiting transmembrane lipids and proteins (see Introduction). The results imply that the surface motifs of the condensed cargo also recruit docking receptors. These normal vesicles have little flexibility, offer a small contact area for vesicle motors, and are retained at the plasma membrane when encountering their docking proteins. Floppy vesicles arise when uncondensed mutated prohormone and its solvent surround the aggregate matrix. The floppy side of the vesicle may not recruit docking receptors, because surface motifs are absent. Thus, the probability of vesicle binding to the docking sites is strongly reduced. This model is compatible with and extends previous studies on sorting of secretory proteins aggregating in the trans-Golgi network.69,11,12,15 Ultimate proof demands the identification of as-yet unknown docking receptors of the atrial granule and experimental evidence for their disappearance in floppy vesicles.
|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received June 20, 2001; accepted July 9, 2001.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.
Jamieson JD, Palade GE. Specific granules in atrial muscle cells. J Cell Biol. . 1964; 23: 151172.
3.
Jiao J-H, Baertschi AJ. Neural control of the endocrine rat heart. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. . 1993; 90: 77997803.
4.
Sei CE, Hand GL, Murray SF, Glembotski CC. The cosecretional maturation of atrial natriuretic factor by primary atrial myocytes. Mol Endocrinol. . 1992; 6: 309319.
5.
Slot JW, Garruti G, Oorschot V, Posthuma G, Kraegen EW, Laybutt R, Thibault G, James DE. Glucose transporter (GLUT-4) is targeted to secretory granules in rat atrial cardiomyocytes. J Cell Biol. . 1997; 137: 12431254.
6.
Dannies PS. Protein hormone storage in secretory granules: mechanisms for concentration and sorting. Endocr Rev. . 1999; 20: 321.
7.
Thibault G, Doubell AF. Binding and aggregation of pro-atrial natriuretic factor by calcium. Am J Physiol. . 1992; 262: C907C915.
8. Gerdes H-H, Glombik MM. Signal-mediated sorting to the regulated pathway of protein secretion. Anat Anz. . 1999; 181: 447453.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9.
Canaff L, Brechler V, Reudelhuber TL, Thibault G. Secretory granule targeting of atrial natriuretic peptide correlates with its calcium-mediated aggregation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. . 1996; 93: 94839487.
10.
Cool DR, Fenger M, Snell CR, Loh YP. Identification of the sorting signal motif within pro-opiomelanocortin for the regulated secretory pathway. J Biol Chem. . 1995; 270: 87238729.
11. Arvan P, Castle D. Sorting and storage during secretory granule biogenesis: looking backward and looking forward. Biochem J. . 1998; 332: 593610.
12. Thiele C, Huttner WB. Protein and lipid sorting from the trans-Golgi network to secretory granules: recent developments. Semin Cell Dev Biol. . 1998; 9: 511516.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Tooze SA. Biogenesis of secretory granules in the trans-Golgi network of neuroendocrine and endocrine cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. . 1998; 1404: 231244.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Kuiper RP, Martens GJM. Prohormone transport through the secretory pathway of neuroendocrine cells. Biochem Cell Biol. . 2000; 78: 289298.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15.
Chanat E, Huttner WB. Milieu-induced, selective aggregation of regulated secretory proteins in the trans-Golgi network. J Cell Biol. . 1991; 115: 15051519.
16. Klenchin VA, Martin TF. Priming in exocytosis: attaining fusion-competence after vesicle docking. Biochimie. . 2000; 82: 399407.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Steyer JA, Horstmann H, Almers W. Transport, docking and exocytosis of granules in live chromaffin cells. Nature. . 1997; 388: 474478.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Chen YA, Scheller RH. SNARE-mediated membrane fusion. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. . 2001; 2: 98106.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19.
Jiao JH, Baumann P, Baron A, Roatti A, Pence RA, Baertschi AJ. Sulfonylurea receptor ligands modulate stretch-induced ANF secretion in rat atrial myocyte culture. Am J Physiol. . 2000; 278: H2028H2038.
20.
Sadoshima J, Jahn L, Takahashi T, Kulik TJ, Izumo S. Molecular characterization of the stretch-induced adaptation of cultured cardiac cells. J Biol Chem. . 1992; 267: 1055110560.
21.
Claycomb WC, Lanson NA Jr, Stallworth BS, Egeland DB, Delcarpio JB, Bahinski A, Izzo NJ Jr. HL-1 cells: a cardiac muscle cell line that contracts and retains phenotypic characteristics of the adult cardiomyocyte. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. . 1998; 95: 29792984.
22. Burke NV, Han W, Li D, Takimoto K, Watkins SC, Levitan ES. Neuronal peptide release is limited by secretory granule mobility. Neuron. . 1997; 19: 10951102.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Malatesta M, Zancanaro C, Martin TE, Chan EK, Amalric F, Luhrmann R, Vogel P, Fakan S. Cytochemical and immunocytochemical characterization of nuclear bodies during hibernation. Eur J Cell Biol. . 1994; 65: 8293.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Tereda S, Hirokawa N. Moving on to the cargo problem of microtubule-dependent motors in neurons. Curr Opin Neurobiol. . 2000; 10: 566573.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Research Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2001 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |