| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Molecular Medicine |
From the Departments of Pharmacology (J.M.B.A., H.G., M.D.) and Microbiology and Immunology (S.M.T.), SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY; Department of Pediatrics (M.C.), University of Geneva, Switzerland; and the Krannert Institute of Cardiology (A.P.M.), Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind.
Correspondence to Justus M.B. Anumonwo, PhD, Department of Pharmacology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, 766 Irving Ave, Syracuse, NY 13210. E-mail anumonwj{at}mail.upstate.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: Cx40 connexin carboxyl terminal domain unitary conductance
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In vertebrates, gap junctions are formed by oligomerization of a protein called connexin (Cx). Most cells express more than one connexin isotype.7 In particular, Cx40 and Cx43 are both expressed in the atrium,8 9 endothelium,10 and smooth muscle cells,10 11 and there is evidence that they heteromerize.12 13 14 15 The various connexins also have a similar putative membrane topology, as follows: 4 membrane-spanning domains linked by 1 cytoplasmic and 2 extracellular loops and a cytoplasmic N- and C-terminus.7 The cytoplasmic N- and C-termini of connexins differ in primary sequence and length, whereas the transmembrane and extracellular domains are highly conserved.7
Connexins are highly regulatable molecules, susceptible to association with a number of kinases and with other junctional7 16 and nonjunctional proteins.17 We have previously proposed a "ball-and-chainlike" model18 for the chemical regulation of Cx40 and Cx43. According to this model, the carboxyl terminal (CT) domain acts as a gating particle that, under the appropriate conditions (eg, intracellular acidification or phosphorylation), binds to a receptor affiliated with the pore and closes the channel. Consistent with this model, we showed that truncation of the CT domain of Cx40 and of Cx43 resulted in a diminished pH sensitivity of the channels, whereas coexpression of the truncated connexin with mRNA coding for the CT domain (as a separate fragment) restored normal function.18 A similar ball-and-chain model applies to the regulation of Cx43 by insulin or insulin-like growth factor,19 20 as well as by v-src.21 Moreover, we have found that the chemical sensitivity of one truncated connexin channel can be restored by coexpression of the CT domain of a different connexin.20 This promiscuity in the particle-receptor association led to the concept of "heterodomain interactions," in which the CT domain of one connexin can interact with the pore-forming region of another.20 Heterodomain interactions are likely to occur in heteromeric Cx40-Cx43 channels, and they may be responsible for the enhanced sensitivity of these gap junctions to pHi22 as well as to halothane.23 Given the presence of heteromeric gap junctions in native cells,8 9 14 it is relevant to understand the structural bases of their function and regulation.
In this study, we pursue the question of whether interactions between the CT domain and the pore-forming region of connexins are also involved in the control of the biophysical properties of the channel in N2A cells as well as in the Xenopus oocytes. Previous data show that truncation of the CT domain of Cx43 alters its voltage dependence.24 There is evidence that substates as well as the "residual state" of Cx43 results from an interaction between the CT domain and the channel-forming part of the protein (Elenes et al, unpublished data, 2001). In this study, we show that in the N2A cells, (1) the lower-conductance state of Cx40 and a component of its voltage-dependent relaxation are eliminated by truncation of the CT domain, (2) the lower-conductance state is rescued by coexpression of the CT domain of either Cx40 or Cx43, and (3) a chimeric construct formed by Cx40 with its CT replaced by that of Cx43 shows a unitary conductance and voltage-gating profile indistinguishable from that of wild-type Cx40. Overall, our results indicate that the lower-conductance state of Cx40 can be modeled as a ball-and-chain type of interaction and suggest that heterodomain interactions may participate in the multiple conductance states observed in Cx40-Cx43 heteromers. Whether these interactions also modulate the permselectivity of the channels and their ability to couple metabolic functions remains to be determined.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
3.4 and 10 pA away from the
baseline and represent unitary conductances (
) of 56 and 168
pS for the lower-conductance state and main state,
respectively.
|
Figure 1B
shows an all-transitions histogram of events as a
function of unitary conductance from 5 cell pairs (n=204). In agreement
with previous
studies,14 26 27
we found a 2-gaussian distribution, with peaks centered at 55 and 172
pS.
A very different single-channel profile was recorded
from cells expressing the truncation mutant. The sets of traces in
Figure 2A
depict
7 seconds of recording from a
cell pair stably transfected with Cx40tr248. Junctional currents are
the bottom traces in each set. The
Vj was
+60 mV. The all-events histogram
(Figure 2B
) contains the pooled data from 9 cell pairs with a
total of 368 channel events. The data were pooled from cell pairs
expressing the truncated channel alone (n=158) or the truncated channel
plus enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) (n=210; see
Materials and Methods). Fitting the data to a single gaussian yielded a
peak of 168 pS.
|
We have previously demonstrated that pH sensitivity of Cx40
is decreased after CT truncation and restored by coexpression of the CT
fragment.20 Here, we
determined whether the presence of the lower-conductance state could
also be restored by separate expression of the homologous CT domain.
Figure 3A
shows a recording from a cell pair stably
transfected with Cx40tr248 and in which the pIRES plasmid containing
EGFP and Cx40CT was transiently transfected.
Figure 3B
depicts the composed histogram of events (number
of events, n=312, number of cell pairs, N=4). Fitting the data
to a multipeak gaussian yielded 2 peaks centered at 53 and 172 pS.
Clearly, although expressed as a completely separate fragment, the CT
domain was able to interact with the pore-forming region of the protein
to rescue the lower-conductance state.
|
Our previous studies also showed promiscuity in the particle
receptor interaction during chemical
gating.20 We therefore
ascertained whether heterodomain interactions could occur during
single-channel gating and modulate unitary conductance. As shown in
Figure 4A
, coexpression of the CT domain of Cx43 restored
the lower-conductance state of the Cx40 channel (n=401, N=3). The
histogram of events in
Figure 4B
has 2 peaks, centered at 57 and 173 pS. These
average conductances are indistinguishable from those recorded from
either wild-type channels or truncated channels after coexpression of
the homologous CT domain. It should be noted, however, that the
transitions to the lower-conductance state were much less frequent when
the CT domain was expressed separately (either the Cx40CT or the
Cx43CT) than when recording from wild-type
channels.
|
Heterodomain interactions may be limited by the physical
separation of the fragments, as well as by the relative concentrations
of the 2 proteins. To assess the ability of the Cx43CT domain to
interact with the Cx40 channel under conditions similar to those of the
wild-type construct, we tested the single-channel behavior of a
Cx40tr-43CT chimera.
Figure 5A
shows currents recorded from an N2A cell pair
stably transfected with this construct. The junctional current trace
magnification (at arrows) demonstrates channel openings to 2 different
levels. Unitary conductance data (n=265) from 4 cell pairs were pooled
in the histogram shown in panel B. The 2 peaks in the distribution are
centered at 55 and 165 pS. These results show that the chimeric
construct has the unitary conductance profile of the Cx40 wild-type
channel. However, frequency of events at the lower-conductance state
was less than for the wild-type channels.
|
Voltage Dependence and Current Kinetics
Previous studies have characterized the effect of CT
truncation on the voltage-gating properties of Cx32 and Cx43. There was
a change in the gating kinetics with the
disappearance24 or decrease
(Elenes et al, unpublished data, 2001) in the magnitude of the fast
component, and the concurrent decrease in the minimum conductance
(Gmin).24
Figure 6
illustrates the time course of wild-type (panel A)
and truncated (panel B) Cx40 channel currents
(Vj=-100
mV). Current decline in the cell pair expressing the wild-type channels
is best described by a double-exponential function (see superimposed
fit). In contrast, current decline in Cx40tr248 channels relaxed
monoexponentially (a single-exponential fit is
superimposed). The exponential fits in panels A and B are shown in
panel C. Thus, truncation of Cx40 channels resulted in a faster
relaxation rate and the elimination of one of the exponential
components.
Figure 6D
is a comparison of the voltage dependence of
macroscopic junctional conductance in wild-type (n=7) and mutant Cx40
channels (n=5). The continuous lines are the Boltzmann fits to mean
values of conductance (see
Table
for fitting parameters). We observed a lower
Gmin
after truncation, consistent with the elimination of the
lower-conductance state. No significant changes on other voltage-gating
parameters were detected. These data are similar to those
obtained after truncation of Cx32 and Cx43
channels.24
|
|
We have shown that coexpression of Cx43CT rescues the
lower-conductance state of the truncated Cx40
(Figure 4
). We therefore determined whether the CT of Cx43
could restore the voltage-gating behavior of Cx40.
Figure 7A
compares voltage dependence of macroscopic
junctional conductance in wild-type and chimeric Cx40 channels in N2A
cells.
Gss/Vj
plots for the wild-type (n=7) and chimeric channels (n=5) are shown
superimposed in this panel for the N2A cells. The wild-type channel
data are the same as shown in
Figure 6
. The continuous lines on the data are the fits to
mean values of conductance. Other parameters returned from
the fitting of individual data sets are presented in the
Table
.
A comparison of voltage-gating variables recorded from
wild-type and chimeric channels revealed no significant differences,
suggesting that the CT of Cx43 is capable of functional interaction
with the pore-forming domains of Cx40, modifying gating kinetics in a
voltage-dependent manner.
|
Similar experiments were carried out in oocytes; results of
these are illustrated in
Figure 7B
and in the
Table
.
Unlike in the N2A cells, the voltage-gating variables as well as
the kinetics
(Vj=-100
mV) recorded from wild-type channels in oocytes were not
significantly different (except for the slow component in the chimeric
channel) from those recorded in the truncated or in the chimeric
channels expressed in the oocytes
(Table
).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Unitary Conductance of Wild-Type and Truncated
Cx40 Channels
The basic biophysical properties of Cx40 channels
are well
characterized.13 14 26 27
The mean unitary conductance values observed in our experiments are
consistent with those previously
obtained27 using
recording conditions similar to those described here.
Furthermore, we show that truncation of the CT domain causes the
disappearance of the lower-conductance state without affecting the mean
unitary conductance of the main open state. These data suggest that the
main open state of the channel is structurally independent from the CT
region and that transitions to the lower-conductance state result from
separate interactions that involve the CT domain.
Ball-and-Chain Model for Gating to the
Lower-Conductance State
The data show that separate coexpression of either the
homologous (Cx40) or the heterologous (Cx43) CT fragments with the
truncated channel restored the lower-conductance state (see
Figures 3
and 4
). This result implies that the CT fragment
behaves like an independent domain. It also indicates that the
lower-conductance state involves the interaction between (at least) 2
separate domains of the protein, as follows: the CT domain on one hand
and a region that is part of the truncated Cx40 sequence on the other.
By analogy with other biological reactions involving 2 separate
molecules (eg, hormone receptor), we describe this intramolecular
interaction by a generic model in which the CT acts as a ligand that
binds to a receptor. Because of the applicability of the ball-and-chain
model to the description of chemical gating in Cx40 and
Cx43,18 20 we
incorporate the same term here and propose the ball and chain as a
model for the gating of Cx40 to its lower-conductance
state.
It should be noted that the frequency of transitions to the
lower-conductance state was lower when the CT fragment was expressed
separately from the channel-forming protein than when both elements
were covalently attached (compare the data on
Figures 3
and 4
with those on
Figure 1
). It can be speculated that residence in the
lower-conductance state is limited by the steric constraints imposed on
the CT fragment when it is physically separated from the rest of the
molecule. Additionally, it is possible that the concentration of the CT
fragment in the coexpression experiments is such that the appropriate
stoichiometric ratio for full functionality is not achieved. Finally,
we speculate that the ability of the CT fragment to hold the channel in
a residual state may be related to its ability to associate to a
partner molecule. Indeed, recent data show that Cx43 (and likely other
-connexins that share the ability to bind to PDZ domains) do
not seat alone in the membrane but associate with at least one
scaffolding protein (ZO-1; see Toyofuku et
al17 ). A recent study by
Toyofuku et al29 further
shows that this association can be disrupted by c-src binding. The
interaction of Cx43 with v-src is known to follow a ball-and-chain form
of gating.21 It is therefore
tempting to propose that voltage gating may modify the conformation of
the connexon to the point where other molecular associations are
affected, and this association may be compromised when the CT fragment
is not an integral part of the connexin
structure.
Kinetics and Voltage-Dependent Gating
Available experimental data show that mutations in
various connexin regions influence the voltage-gating mechanism,
suggesting that this process results from a complex molecular
rearrangement of the
protein30 31
(reviewed by Skerret et
al32 ). Our data in the N2A
cells and those of others24
indicate that the CT domain forms a part of that complex process.
Moreover, the role of the CT on voltage gating seems conserved among at
least some connexins. Indeed, as in the case of Cx40 (see
Figure 6
and the
Table
),
truncation of the CT has little effect on the
V0
(voltage value at half channel relaxation of junctional conductance)
and slope factor of gating but causes a small reduction in the
Gmin of
both Cx32 and Cx43.24
Relaxation kinetics are best described by a biexponential function for
the wild-type channels but become mostly
monoexponential after truncation of the CT
domain.24 It is tempting to
speculate (see Revilla et
al24 ) that the separate time
courses reflect 2 independent voltage-gating mechanisms, 1 of which is
directly mediated by the CT domain. It is noteworthy, however, that in
that study, the overall time course of current relaxation after CT
truncation was slower for Cx43 and faster for Cx32. Our data also show
an acceleration of the inactivation rate after CT truncation. Given
that the Cx40 wild-type phenotype is recovered after
chimerization of the Cx43CT, these results suggest that the amino acid
sequence or length of the CT domain is not the factor responsible for
the rate-limiting step of inactivation. Rather, we propose that the
Cx40CT or the Cx43CT acts as a rather nonspecific effector of
gating.
In the oocyte experiments, we did not find any significant
differences between the wild-type, truncated, and chimeric channels
with respect to junctional current kinetics and the voltage dependence
of channel gating
(Figure 7
, Table
).
However, compared with the wild-type channel, there was an increase in
the time constant of the slow kinetic component of the chimeric
channel. The differences in the macroscopic behavior of the channels
between the N2A cells and the oocytes cannot be precisely determined
from this study, but we speculate that they may be attributable to the
different expression systems (oocytes versus N2A cells). In this
regard, it is noteworthy that the voltage-dependent gating
parameters of the wild-type Cx40 channels are different in
the 2 expression systems (compare, eg, Beblo et
al27 with Bruzzone et
al33 ); gating may be
affected by association of the channel protein with other molecules,
the nature of which may depend on the cell expression system.
Furthermore, differences in the lipid environment of expression systems
may also affect channel gating. Consequently, the expression system
used to study an ion channel may affect the basic as well as the
regulatory properties of the channel.
Previous studies have associated the existence of a lower conductance (or "residual") state in the single-channel behavior of connexins with the prevalence of a residual conductance during macroscopic voltage gating.34 The elimination of the lower conducting state after truncation would lead to the prediction that macroscopic Ij should decrease to 0 during a voltage step. Yet, our experiments show a decrease in Gj min but not its complete disappearance. We lack a clear mechanistic explanation as to why Gmin is preserved even though low-conductance events are not detected. At least 4 possibilities can be considered, as follows: (1) the amplitude of the low-conductance events decreased to undetectable levels; (2) the dwell time became too short (although the transitions could be frequent); (3) channels with prominent low-conductance states were more susceptible to uncouplers (selective block by uncouplers has been shown by He and Burt23 ); or (4) after truncation, the channels resided permanently in a voltage-independent, open, low-conductance state. Currently, none of these possibilities can be discarded. Nevertheless, our data show that under our recording conditions truncation of the CT domain leads to the disappearance of a particular range of conductances that are otherwise present in wild-type, chimeric, or coexpressed configurations. This is a novel observation, relevant to our understanding of the molecular/structural mechanisms controlling gap junction channel conductance, particularly in cell systems in which Cx40 and Cx43 are coexpressed.
Coexpression of the CT fragment restores the lower-conductance state of a truncated Cx43, but not its voltage-gating behavior (Elenes et al, unpublished data, 2001). On the other hand, our results show that chimerization of the Cx43CT on the Cx40 truncated channel restores the voltage-gating kinetics of Cx40. This suggests that transjunctional voltage can drive the CT domain into an interaction with the pore-forming region but only if the CT is covalently attached to the rest of the molecule. This is consistent with a model in which the CT domain acts as an effector of voltage gating (Elenes et al, unpublished data, 2001). Whether the voltage sensor and/or the transducer of gating is structurally related to the CT domain remains to be determined.
Heterodomain Interactions and Channel
Gating
Our data demonstrate that a homologous Cx40 channel can
enter the lower-conductance state as a result of its interaction with
the CT domain of either Cx43 or Cx40. These results suggest that
despite their differences in primary sequence, the CT domains of Cx40
and of Cx43 can reach a similar conformation, thus allowing for
interaction with a common binding domain. The way in which this
function is integrated in a heteromeric connexon is unknown. It is
possible that, in a heteromer, gating results not only from
interactions within a connexin but across heterologous connexin domains
within the connexon. A similar model has been proposed for pH gating of
Cx40-Cx43 heteromers.20 In
that case, heterodomain interactions are actually more efficient than
homodomain interactions at closing the
channels.22 Future studies
will determine whether heterodomain interactions have a synergistic
effect, thus enhancing the ability of the channel to reside in the
lower-conductance state.
Chemical and Voltage Gating: Two Steps of the
Same Process?
Previous studies have suggested that, whereas voltage
gating causes a reduction of conductance from open to residual,
chemical gating drives the channel into the closed
state.35 It is thus
interesting to note that an intramolecular particle-receptor
interaction seems responsible for both chemical gating and residence in
the lower-conductance state. We speculate that the lower-conductance
state constitutes a required conformation for the chemically induced
closure of the channel. A "linear" model in which the channel
transits into the lower-conductance state before reaching complete
closure during chemical gating can be used as a first approach to
understand the relation between these two processes.
In summary, we have shown that the presence of the CT domain is required for the Cx40 channel to reside in the lower-conductance state. Coexpression experiments indicate that the CT of either Cx40 or Cx43 can act as an independent domain that interacts with the Cx40 channel to limit conductance. We propose that the lower-conductance state is consequent to a particle-receptor interaction, of the type described for the ball-and-chain model of gating, and that this process allows for heterodomain interactions in heterologous channels. Whether the lower-conductance state is a necessary prelude to the closed state that is brought about by chemical gating remains to be determined.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Simon AM, Goodenough DA, Paul DL. Mice lacking connexin40 have cardiac conduction abnormalities characteristic of atrioventricular block and bundle branch block. Curr Biol. 1998;8:295298.
3. Kirchhoff S, Nelles E, Hagendorff A, Kruger O, Traub O, Willecke K. Reduced cardiac conduction velocity and predisposition to arrhythmias in connexin40-deficient mice. Curr Biol. 1998;8:299302.
4. Loewenstein WR, Rose B. The cell-cell channel in the control of growth. Semin Cell Biol. 1992;3:5979.
5. Reaume AG, De Sousa PA, Kulkarni S, Langille BL, Zhu D, Davies TC, Juneja SC, Kidder GM, Rossant J. Cardiac malformation in neonatal mice lacking connexin43. Science. 1995;267:18311834.
6. Lo CW, Wessels A. Cx43 gap junctions in cardiac development. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 1998;8:264269.
7. Bruzzone R, White TW, Paul DL. Connections with connexins: the molecular basis of direct intercellular signaling. Eur J Biochem. 1996;238:127.
8. Gros D, Jongsma HJ. Connexins in mammalian heart function. Bioessays. 1996;118:719730.
9. Verheule S, van Kempen MJ, te Welscher PH, Kwak BR, Jongsma HJ. Characterization of gap junction channels in adult rabbit atrial and ventricular myocardium. Circ Res. 1997;80:673681.
10. White TW, Bruzzone R. Multiple connexin proteins in single intercellular channels: connexin compatibility and functional consequences. J Bioenerg Biomembr. 1996;28:339350.
11. Little TL, Beyer EC, Duling BR. Connexin 43 and connexin 40 gap junctional proteins are present in arteriolar smooth muscle and endothelium in vivo. Am J Physiol. 1995;268:H729H739.
12. Brink PR, Cronin K, Banach K, Peterson E, Westphale EM, Seul KH, Ramanan SV, Beyer EC. Evidence for heteromeric gap junction channels formed from rat connexin43 and human connexin37. Am J Physiol. 1997;273:C1386C1396.
13. He DS, Jiang JX, Taffet SM, Burt JM. Formation of heteromeric gap junction channels by connexins 40 and 43 in vascular smooth muscle cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:64956500.
14. Elenes S, Rubart M, Moreno AP. Junctional communication between isolated pairs of canine atrial cells is mediated by homogeneous and heterogeneous gap junction channels. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1999;10:9901004.
15. Li X, Simard JM. Multiple connexins form gap junction channels in rat basilar artery smooth muscle cells. Circ Res. 1999;84:12771284.
16. Goodenough DA, Goliger JA, Paul DL. Connexins, connexons, and intercellular communication. Annu Rev Biochem. 1996;65:475502.
17. Toyofuku T, Yabuki M, Otsu K, Kuzuya T, Hori M, Tada M. Direct association of the gap junction protein connexin-43 with ZO-1 in cardiac myocytes. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:1272512731.
18. Morley GE, Taffet SM, Delmar M. Intramolecular interactions mediate pH regulation of connexin43 channels. Biophys J. 1996;70:12941302.
19. Homma N, Alvarado JL, Coombs W, Stergiopoulos K, Taffet SM, Lau AF, Delmar M. A particle-receptor model for the insulin-induced closure of connexin43 channels. Circ Res. 1998;83:2732.
20. Stergiopoulos K, Alvarado JL, Mastroianni M, Ek-Vitorin JF, Taffet SM, Delmar M. Hetero-domain interactions as a mechanism for the regulation of connexin channels. Circ Res. 1999;84:11441155.
21. Zhou L, Kasperek EM, Nicholson BJ. Dissection of the molecular basis of pp60(v-src) induced gating of connexin 43 gap junction channels. J Cell Biol. 1999;144:10331045.
22. Gu H, Ek-Vitorin JF, Taffet SM, Delmar M. Coexpression of connexins 40 and 43 enhances the pH sensitivity of gap junctions: a model for synergistic interactions among connexins. Circ Res. 2000;86:E98E103.
23. He DS, Burt JM. Mechanism and selectivity of the effects of halothane on gap junction channel function. Circ Res. 2000;86:E104E109.
24. Revilla A, Castro C, Barrio LC. Molecular dissection of transjunctional voltage dependence in the connexin-32 and connexin-43 junctions. Biophys J. 1999;77:13741383.
26. Bukauskas FF, Elfgang C, Willecke K, Weingart R. Biophysical properties of gap junction channels formed by mouse connexin40 in induced pairs of transfected human HeLa cells. Biophys J. 1995;68:22892298.
27. Beblo DA, Wang HZ, Beyer EC, Westphale EM, Veenstra RD. Unique conductance, gating, and selective permeability properties of gap junction channels formed by connexin40. Circ Res. 1995;77:813822.
28. Veenstra RD. Physiological modulation of cardiac gap junction channels. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1991;2:168189.
29. Toyofuku T, Zhang H, Akamatsu Y, Kuzuya T, Tada M, Hori M. c-Src regulates the interaction between connexin-43 and ZO-1 in cardiac myocytes. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:17801788.
30. Rubin JB, Verselis VK, Bennett MV, Bargiello TA. A domain substitution procedure and its use to analyze voltage dependence of homotypic gap junctions formed by connexins 26 and 32. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992;89:38203824.
31. Verselis VK, Ginter CS, Bargiello TA. Opposite voltage gating polarities of two closely related connexins. Nature. 1994;368:348351.
32. Skerret IM, Smith JF, Nicholson BJ. Mechanistic differences between chemical and electrical gating of gap junctions. In: Peracchia C, ed. Gap Junctions: Molecular Basis of Cell Communication in Health and Disease. Vol 49. New York, NY: Academic Press; 2000:249269.
33. Bruzzone R, Haefliger JA, Gimlich RL, Paul DL. Connexin40, a component of gap junctions in vascular endothelium, is restricted in its ability to interact with other connexins. Mol Biol Cell. 1993;4:720.
34. Valiunas V, Bukauskas FF, Weingart R. Conductances and selective permeability of connexin43 gap junction channels examined in neonatal rat heart cells. Circ Res. 1997;80:708719.
35. Bukauskas FF, Peracchia C. Two distinct gating mechanisms in gap junction channels: CO2-sensitive and voltage-sensitive. Biophys J. 1997;72:21372142.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Fenwick, R.J. Richardson, J. Butterworth, M.J. Barron, and M.J. Dixon Novel Mutations in GJA1 Cause Oculodentodigital syndrome Journal of Dental Research, November 1, 2008; 87(11): 1021 - 1026. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Peracchia and L. L. Peracchia Inversion of both gating polarity and CO2 sensitivity of voltage gating with D3N mutation of Cx50 Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, June 1, 2005; 288(6): C1381 - C1389. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Puljung, V. M. Berthoud, E. C. Beyer, and D. A. Hanck Polyvalent Cations Constitute the Voltage Gating Particle in Human Connexin37 Hemichannels J. Gen. Physiol., October 25, 2004; 124(5): 587 - 603. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Seki, H. S. Duffy, W. Coombs, D. C. Spray, S. M. Taffet, and M. Delmar Modifications in the Biophysical Properties of Connexin43 Channels by a Peptide of the Cytoplasmic Loop Region Circ. Res., August 20, 2004; 95(4): e22 - e28. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Delmar, W. Coombs, P. Sorgen, H. S Duffy, and S. M Taffet Structural bases for the chemical regulation of Connexin43 channels Cardiovasc Res, May 1, 2004; 62(2): 268 - 275. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. P Moreno Biophysical properties of homomeric and heteromultimeric channels formed by cardiac connexins Cardiovasc Res, May 1, 2004; 62(2): 276 - 286. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. E.M. Martin and W.H. Evans Incorporation of connexins into plasma membranes and gap junctions Cardiovasc Res, May 1, 2004; 62(2): 378 - 387. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. S. Duffy, P. L. Sorgen, M. E. Girvin, P. O'Donnell, W. Coombs, S. M. Taffet, M. Delmar, and D. C. Spray pH-Dependent Intramolecular Binding and Structure Involving Cx43 Cytoplasmic Domains J. Biol. Chem., September 20, 2002; 277(39): 36706 - 36714. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. F. Bukauskas, A. Bukauskiene, V. K. Verselis, and M. V. L. Bennett Coupling asymmetry of heterotypic connexin 45/ connexin 43-EGFP gap junctions: Properties of fast and slow gating mechanisms PNAS, May 14, 2002; 99(10): 7113 - 7118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Popp, R. P. Brandes, G. Ott, R. Busse, and I. Fleming Dynamic Modulation of Interendothelial Gap Junctional Communication by 11,12-Epoxyeicosatrienoic Acid Circ. Res., April 19, 2002; 90(7): 800 - 806. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. P. Moreno, M. Chanson, J. Anumonwo, I. Scerri, H. Gu, S. M. Taffet, and M. Delmar Role of the Carboxyl Terminal of Connexin43 in Transjunctional Fast Voltage Gating Circ. Res., March 8, 2002; 90(4): 450 - 457. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. P. Moreno, M. Chanson, J. Anumonwo, I. Scerri, H. Gu, S. M. Taffet, and M. Delmar Role of the Carboxyl Terminal of Connexin43 in Transjunctional Fast Voltage Gating Circ. Res., March 8, 2002; 90(4): 450 - 457. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Popp, R. P. Brandes, G. Ott, R. Busse, and I. Fleming Dynamic Modulation of Interendothelial Gap Junctional Communication by 11,12-Epoxyeicosatrienoic Acid Circ. Res., April 19, 2002; 90(7): 800 - 806. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Research Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2001 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |