Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation Research
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation Research. 2001;88:578-586

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Iwata, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ogawa, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Iwata, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ogawa, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Biochemistry and metabolism
Right arrow Heart failure - basic studies
Right arrow Myocardial cardiomyopathy disease
(Circulation Research. 2001;88:578.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.


Integrative Physiology

Autoimmunity Against the Second Extracellular Loop of ß1-Adrenergic Receptors Induces ß-Adrenergic Receptor Desensitization and Myocardial Hypertrophy In Vivo

Michikado Iwata, Tsutomu Yoshikawa, Akiyasu Baba, Toshihisa Anzai, Iwao Nakamura, Yumiko Wainai, Toshiyuki Takahashi, Satoshi Ogawa

From the Cardiology Division, Department of Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Correspondence to Tsutomu Yoshikawa, MD, Cardiology Division, Department of Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan 160-8582. E-mail tyoshi{at}mc.med.keio.ac.jp


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Abstract—Although immunoapheresis removing autoantibodies against the second extracellular domain of ß1-adrenergic receptors (ARs) improves cardiac function in patients with cardiomyopathy, the underlying mechanisms have not been defined. We examined the role of autoimmunity against the domain in the development of cardiac dysfunction in vivo. Japanese white rabbits were immunized with a synthetic peptide corresponding to the second extracellular loop of ß1-AR once a month with (ß+biso rabbits, n=10) or without (ß rabbits, n=13) bisoprolol treatment (2 mg/kg per day). Control rabbits received vehicle without bisoprolol treatment (n=13). Autoantibodies of IgG isotype against the domain were persistently detected in ß and ß+biso rabbits. Purified IgG from sera of ß and ß+biso rabbits increased cAMP production in a rabbit cardiac membrane preparation, which was blocked by bisoprolol. At 3 months, ß-AR uncoupling with increased G protein–coupled receptor kinase 5 (GRK5) expression was found in ß rabbits. At 6 months, left ventricular hypertrophy was noted with hemodynamic derangements in ß rabbits. This was accompanied by decreased ß1-AR density and increased inhibitory G protein and GRK5 expression, which were related to marked decrease in membrane cAMP production. These changes in ß rabbits at 6 months were prevented in ß+biso rabbits. There was no difference in the plasma norepinephrine concentration in the 3 groups over the observation period. Thus, autoimmunity against the second extracellular loop of ß1-ARs induced profound ß-AR desensitization and myocardial hypertrophy in vivo, associated with cardiac dysfunction. Sustained sympathomimetic-like actions of autoantibodies against the domain may be partly responsible for these changes.


Key Words: autoimmunity • cardiomyopathy • ß-adrenergic receptor • hypertrophy • cardiac dysfunction


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Certain forms of acquired cardiomyopathy are associated with autoimmunity as well as virus infection.1 Autoantibodies against the second extracellular domain of ß1-adrenergic receptors (ARs) are prevalent in patients with cardiomyopathy.2 3 4 Immunoapheresis removing these autoantibodies ameliorates their symptoms and hemodynamic abnormalities.5 This suggests that autoimmunity against the domain plays a role in the development of cardiac dysfunction in cardiomyopathy. However, the underlying mechanisms have not been defined.

Previous studies have shown that autoantibodies against the second extracellular domain of ß1-ARs exert sustained intrinsic sympathomimetic-like actions on cardiomyocytes in vitro.2 Because chronic stimulation of ß-ARs gives rise to alterations in cardiac ß-adrenergic signaling,6 7 8 myocardial hypertrophy,7 9 or damage,10 we speculated that autoimmunity might be responsible for such changes, leading to the development of cardiomyopathy and cardiac dysfunction. Actually, autoantibodies against the domain are found in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy as well as dilated cardiomyopathy.3 4 Although it is clear that ß-adrenergic signaling is altered in cardiomyopathy,11 12 13 relations to autoimmunity are not completely understood in vivo. Especially, G protein–coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) are extremely important in modulating myocardial adrenergic signaling and cardiac function.8 13 14 Nevertheless, relationships between autoimmunity and GRKs have not been previously reported.

Beneficial effects of ß blockers on cardiac function have been confirmed in patients with cardiomyopathy.15 16 17 ß blockers might improve cardiac performance in patients with autoantibodies against the domain by preventing autoimmune-mediated myocardial damage. We sought to clarify the role played by autoimmunity against the second extracellular domain of ß1-ARs in the development of cardiac dysfunction in vivo, by immunizing rabbits with a peptide corresponding to the domain, together with treatment by bisoprolol, a selective ß1 antagonist.


*    Materials and Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Materials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Immunization
Experiments were performed in 36 male Japanese white rabbits, which were 10 weeks old (1.80 to 2.20 kg). The experimental protocol was approved by our Institutional Review Board. A synthetic peptide corresponding to the second extracellular loop of rabbit ß1-AR (residues 197 to 222; HWWRAESDEARRCYNDPKCCDFVTNR) was produced by Peptide Institute, Inc. Twenty-six rabbits were randomly divided into 2 groups, and they were given distilled water throughout the observation period. Thirteen rabbits were immunized by subcutaneous injection of the peptide (1 mg) dissolved in 1 mL of saline conjugated with 0.5 mL of complete and incomplete Freund’s adjuvant once a month (ß rabbits). Thirteen control rabbits received saline containing adjuvant in the same manner. Ten additional rabbits that were immunized with peptide in the same manner were given oral bisoprolol (2 mg/kg per day) dissolved in distilled water (ß+biso rabbits). Three months after starting immunization, 5 rabbits in each group were euthanized (3M rabbits). The remaining rabbits were immunized over 6 months (6M rabbits). The mean plasma concentration of bisoprolol at 6 hours after oral administration in ß+biso rabbits was 9.1 ng/mL (2.4x10-8 mol/L), which corresponds approximately to the therapeutic plasma level.18

ELISA
Peptide (50 µL; 50 µg/mL in 0.1 mol/L Na2CO3) was used to coat individual wells of a 96-well microtiter plate. The wells were then saturated with PBS supplemented with 3% skim milk, 0.1% Tween-20, and 0.01% merthiolate. Rabbit sera (50 µL) diluted 1:200 were added to the coated plates and incubated overnight at 4°C. After 3 washes with PBS, an affinity-purified biotinylated goat anti-rabbit IgG antibody solution, diluted 1:1000 in merthiolate, was allowed to react for 1 hour at room temperature. After 3 washes, the bound biotinylated antibodies were detected using streptavidin-peroxidase (1 µL/mL), H2O2 (2.5 mmol/L) and 2,2'-azino-di-(ethylbenzthiazoline) sulfonic acid (2 mmol/L). After 30 minutes, the optical densities at 492 nm were determined using an ELISA reader (Sanko Junyaku Co).

Ultrasonic Echocardiography
Echocardiography was performed with the rabbit under anesthesia using 3 mg/kg thiopental sodium (Tanabe Seiyaku Co). The parasternal long-axis views were obtained using a 7.5-MHz transducer connected to a Hewlett-Packard Sonos 500 ultrasonic echocardiographic system (model 77010CF), with the rabbit placed in the lateral decubitus position.

Hemodynamic Measurements
At the end of each observation period, hemodynamic measurements were performed in the open-chest condition under anesthesia with chloral hydrate as described previously,19 and finally, the hearts were rapidly removed.

Histological Analysis
Excised hearts were fixed in 10% formalin and embedded in paraffin, and both transverse and cross sections (3 µm thickness) were obtained. Sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and were subjected to light microscopic examinations. Planimetry was performed macroscopically on cross sections of the hearts to evaluate left ventricular (LV) muscle mass and cavity area and microscopically on 100 cross-sectioned myocytes to determine cross-sectional area per myocyte, using NIH Image.

ß-AR Binding Studies
Membrane fractions were prepared using the LV myocardium as described previously.19 The densities of myocardial ß-ARs were determined by a ligand binding assay with [125I]iodocyanopindolol (ICYP) (Amersham Biotech) using membrane samples as previously described.19 Competition binding experiments were performed in duplicate by incubating 50 pmol/L ICYP with (-)isoproterenol using 16 different concentrations ranging from 10-10 to 10-3 mol/L. Nonspecific binding was determined using 1 µmol/L (-)propranolol. The ratio of high- to low-affinity binding sites was determined using nonlinear regression analysis with Prism (GraphPad Software, Inc). Receptor–G protein coupling was assessed using 30 µmol/L 5'-guanylylimidodiphosphate (Gpp[NH]p). The ß12 subpopulations were determined by competitive binding experiments, which were performed in duplicate by incubating 50 pmol/L ICYP with CGP27012A (Novartis Pharma), a selective ß1 antagonist using 16 different concentrations ranging from 10-10 to 10-3 mol/L. The percentage of ß1-ARs was calculated from the high-affinity binding subpopulation.

cAMP Measurements
cAMP production was determined using cardiac membrane preparations under basal conditions and after addition of 10-5 mol/L isoproterenol+10-5 mol/L GTP or of 10-5 mol/L Gpp(NH)p, as previously described.19 Concentration-response relationships for isoproterenol were examined at concentrations ranging from 10-7 to 10-4 mol/L.

Immunoblotting
Immunodetection of stimulatory (Gs) and inhibitory (Gi) G-protein levels in the membrane fraction, as well as of GRK2 and GRK5 protein levels in both the membrane and cytosolic fractions, was performed using standard SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting techniques, as previously described.20 Protein from each fraction (50 µg) was electrophoresed and then immunoblotted. Fixed samples were included on each gel as standard for quantification of the densities of each blot. Antisera against Gs{alpha} (Upstate Biotechnology, Inc) and Gi{alpha}, GRK2, and GRK5 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) were used as primary antibodies, and horseradish peroxidase–linked anti-rabbit IgG (Boehringer Mannheim) was used as a secondary antibody to detect individual protein levels. The densities of each blot were quantified by densitometric scanning and standardized by defining the mean density of membrane fraction from control rabbits at 6 months as 1.0 densitometric unit. The specificities of antibody binding for each antigen were confirmed by neutralization assays using blocking peptides.

Functional Assay With Purified IgG From Sera of Rabbits
After hemodynamic measurements, IgG fractions were isolated from sera of rabbits with an Affi-Gel Protein A Monoclonal Antibody Purification System II Kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories) according to the protocol and desalted over a Bio-Gel P-6DG desalting gel (Bio-Rad Laboratories) to be eluted with PBS (pH 7.4). A cardiac membrane preparation from a control rabbit was incubated in the presence or absence of bisoprolol with purified IgG or with PBS (30°C, 30 minutes), followed by incubation in the presence of 10-5 mol/L GTP with isoproterenol or with buffer alone (30°C, 10 minutes) to determine cAMP production.

Statistics
Data are expressed as mean±SEM. Comparisons between 3 groups were performed by 1-way ANOVA accompanied by a Bonferroni post hoc test when appropriate. Changes in optical densities on ELISA and isoproterenol concentration–dependent data on cAMP production in cardiac membrane preparations from 3 groups were analyzed using a repeated-measures ANOVA, whereas differences in mean values between the groups at a specific dose were determined by 1-way ANOVA. Statistical significance was defined as P<0.05.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
IgG isotype autoantibodies against the second extracellular loop of ß1-ARs were persistently detected by ELISA, as early as 1 month after starting immunization, in both ß and ß+biso rabbits, but not in the control rabbits (Figure 1ADown). Purified IgG (100 µg/mL) from ß and ß+biso rabbits increased cAMP production in cardiac membrane preparations in the absence of either bisoprolol (10-7 mol/L) or isoproterenol (10-6 mol/L), whereas IgG from control rabbits did not have a significant effect. In contrast, isoproterenol-stimulated cAMP production was partly inhibited by the IgG from ß or ß+biso rabbits. In the presence of bisoprolol, the stimulatory effects of the IgG from ß and ß+biso rabbits, as well as those of isoproterenol, were abolished (Figure 1BDown). Moreover, we examined the concentration-response relationships on cAMP production for the purified IgG and isoproterenol and the effects of bisoprolol on these parameters. IgG from ß and ß+biso rabbits increased cAMP production in a concentration-dependent manner, whereas the maximum responses were lower than those of isoproterenol (Figure 1CDown-1). On the other hand, IgG from ß and ß+biso rabbits inhibited isoproterenol-stimulated cAMP production in a concentration-dependent manner (Figure 1CDown-2). These results demonstrate that autoantibodies from ß and ß+biso rabbits act as partial agonists for ß1-ARs, competing with the full agonist isoproterenol. In the presence of bisoprolol, basal cAMP production in the absence of either the IgG or isoproterenol was lower than that in the absence of bisoprolol (Figures 1CDown-1 and 1C-2), showing that bisoprolol acts as an inverse agonist.21 Concentration-response curves in the presence of bisoprolol revealed that the stimulatory effects of IgG from ß and ß+biso rabbits were reversed (Figure 1CDown-1), whereas the effects of isoproterenol were partially blocked by bisoprolol (Figure 1CDown-2).



View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Antibody detection and functional assay. A, ELISA using a synthetic peptide corresponding to the second extracellular loop of ß1-AR with sera from rabbits. Antibody detection was performed in the same assay at the same time. Optical densities were persistently higher in ß and ß+biso rabbits than in control rabbits over the observation period (P<0.001 in the 3 groups of 3M rabbits, P<0.0001 in the 3 groups of 6M rabbits, repeated-measures ANOVA). B, Effects of purified IgG (100 µg/mL) from rabbits on cAMP production in rabbit cardiac membrane preparations. IgG from ß and ß+biso rabbits increased cAMP production in the absence of either isoproterenol or bisoprolol. *P<0.05 vs PBS and IgG from control rabbits in each assay condition (Bonferroni post hoc test). C, Concentration-response relationships on cAMP production in rabbit cardiac membrane preparations for purified IgG from rabbits, isoproterenol, and effects of bisoprolol on these parameters. Concentration-response curves of the IgG in the presence or absence of bisoprolol (C-1) and curves of isoproterenol in the presence of IgG or bisoprolol (C-2) are shown. Solid lines indicate curves in the absence of bisoprolol. Dashed lines indicate curves in the presence of bisoprolol. IgG from ß and ß+biso rabbits acted as partial agonists, whereas bisoprolol acted as an inverse agonist to reverse the actions of IgG and to inhibit those of isoproterenol. Concentration-response data are expressed as percentages of net cAMP production stimulated by 10-4 mol/L isoproterenol in the absence of either IgG or bisoprolol. All data are mean±SEM for each group.

Data on cardiac function are summarized in Table 1Down. At 3 months, there was no difference in any of the parameters measured among the 3 groups. At 6 months, thickening of both the interventricular septum and the posterior wall was noted with a decrease in the LV end-diastolic dimension in ß rabbits compared with control rabbits on echocardiography (Table 1Down and Figure 2ADown). Hemodynamic data demonstrated an elevation in LV end-diastolic pressure and a decrease in peak negative dp/dt and cardiac output in ß rabbits. There was an increase in LV weight in ß rabbits at 6 months (Table 1Down). Macroscopic examination of the hearts revealed LV hypertrophy, as evidenced by an increase in LV muscle mass, and a decrease in the cavity area (Figure 2BDown). LV muscle mass corrected by the total cross-sectional area was increased in ß rabbits. These macroscopic findings were endorsed by microscopic planimetry showing an increase in cross-sectional area per myocyte in ß rabbits (Table 1Down).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Cardiac Function and Morphometrical Analyses



View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Echocardiographic and macroscopic findings in hearts. A, Representative echocardiographic traces from 6M rabbits. B, Representative cross section of hearts at the papillary muscle level from 6M rabbits. Concentric hypertrophy of the left ventricle was observed in ß rabbits.

Histological findings at 3 months included mononuclear cell infiltrates in 3 rabbits each from the ß and ß+biso groups, but not in rabbits from the control group (Figure 3ADown). At 6 months, although cellular infiltrates in the hearts subsided, myocardial hypertrophy with large nuclei, severe disorganizations of the myofibers, and interstitial fibrosis were present in the LV myocardium from ß rabbits. ß+biso rabbits demonstrated this histopathology to a lesser extent (Figure 3BDown).



View larger version (140K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Microscopic findings in hearts. Representative hematoxylin and eosin–stained sections of the left ventricle with x100 magnification at 3 months (A-1 and A-2) and at 6 months (B-1 and B-2). Both transverse (A-1 and B-1) and cross (A-2 and B-2) sections are shown. At 3 months, inflammatory changes with cellular infiltrates were noted in ß (A-1 and A-2, middle) and ß+biso (A-1 and A-2, right) rabbits, but not in control rabbits (A-1 and A-2, left). At 6 months, myocardial hypertrophy with large nuclei, severe myofiber disorganization, and interstitial fibrosis was found in ß rabbits (B-1 and B-2, middle), but not in control rabbits (B-1 and B-2, left). These findings were inhibited in ß+biso rabbits (B-1 and B-2, right). Planimetry was performed to determine myocyte cross-sectional areas on the cross sections. Bar=50 µm.

There was no difference in plasma and LV norepinephrine concentrations among the 3 groups at either 3 or 6 months (Table 2Down). At 3 months, the maximal binding sites of total ß-ARs were similar in the 3 groups, whereas the percentages of high-affinity binding sites were remarkably decreased in ß rabbits. At 6 months, total ß-ARs tended to decrease, primarily as a function of diminished ß1 receptor density in ß rabbits. The percentage of high-affinity binding sites was also decreased (Table 2Down). Isoproterenol-competition curves revealed a loss of guanine nucleotide modulatable binding in ß rabbits (Figure 4ADown). With regard to cAMP production, at 3 months, although there was no difference in the basal and Gpp(NH)p-stimulated production in the 3 groups, the isoproterenol-stimulated production was decreased in ß rabbits. At 6 months, the basal and Gpp(NH)p-stimulated, as well as isoproterenol-stimulated cAMP production, was decreased in ß rabbits (Table 2Down). Moreover, the concentration-response curves of isoproterenol revealed that the maximal cAMP production was decreased in ß rabbits at both 3 and 6 months (Figure 4BDown). These ß-AR signaling abnormalities in ß rabbits were prevented in ß+biso rabbits.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. ß-Adrenergic Receptors and cAMP Production



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Assays on ß-AR and cAMP. A, Isoproterenol-competition curves from 6M rabbits. A decrease in high-affinity binding sites was seen in ß rabbits (A-2) compared with control (A-1) and ß+biso rabbits (A-3). These changes were associated with a loss of guanine nucleotide modulatable binding. In the absence of Gpp(NH)p, both the 1-site model and the 2-site model fitted the curves whereas in the presence of Gpp(NH)p, only the 1-site model fitted the curves in all rabbits. KH and KL indicate dissociation constants for high- and low-affinity binding, respectively; Ki, dissociation constant. B, Concentration-response curves of isoproterenol on cAMP production from 3M and 6M rabbits. Isoproterenol-stimulated cAMP production was significantly attenuated in ß rabbits at both 3 and 6 months. Moreover, the concentration-response curves differed in the 3 groups of 3M rabbits (P<0.05) and of 6M rabbits (P<0.001) (repeated-measures ANOVA). *P<0.05 vs control, {dagger}P<0.05 vs control and ß+biso, {ddagger}P<0.01 vs control and ß+biso, **P<0.001 vs control and P<0.01 vs ß+biso (Bonferroni post hoc test). Data are mean±SEM for each group.

As assessed by immunoblots, at 3 months, there was no difference in protein levels of Gs{alpha}, Gi{alpha}, or GRK2 in the 3 groups, whereas GRK5 protein levels were increased in the membrane fraction from ß rabbits. At 6 months, Gi{alpha} protein levels as well as GRK5 protein levels were increased in the membrane fraction from ß rabbits. GRK2 tended to increase in the membrane fraction from ß rabbits, although there was no statistical significance. The above findings at 3 and 6 months in ß rabbits were prevented in ß+biso rabbits (Figures 5Down and 6Down).



View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Immunoblots of G proteins and GRKs. Representative immunoblots of Gs protein, Gi protein, and GRK5 in the membrane fraction and of GRK2 in the membrane and cytosolic fractions are shown for control (CTL), ß, and ß+biso 3M and 6M rabbits.



View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Densitometric data on immunoblots. A, Assessment of Gi protein expression in the membrane fraction. There was no difference in Gi protein levels in the 3 groups at 3 months (3M), whereas protein levels increased in ß rabbits at 6 months (6M). B, Assessment of GRK2 expression at 6 months. There was no difference in GRK2 protein levels in cytosolic and membrane fractions in the 3 groups. C, Assessment of GRK5 expression at 3 months. GRK5 protein levels increased in the membrane fraction from ß rabbits, but not in the cytosolic fraction. D, Assessment of GRK5 expression at 6 months. GRK5 protein levels increased in the membrane fraction from ß rabbits, but not in the cytosolic fraction. DU indicates densitometric unit. *P<0.01 vs control and P<0.05 vs ß+biso, **P<0.001 vs control and P<0.01 vs ß+biso (Bonferroni post hoc test). Data are expressed mean±SEM for each group.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
The present study provides 3 new major findings. First, autoimmunity against the second extracellular loop of ß1-ARs induced early myocardial ß-AR uncoupling with increased GRK5 expression. Profound desensitization with increased Gi protein expression ensued. Second, the autoimmune process induced cardiac hypertrophy. Third, these changes were prevented by a ß1-selective antagonist bisoprolol, which has an inverse agonist activity.

Cardiomyopathic Changes Induced by Autoimmunity
By immunizing rabbits with a synthetic peptide corresponding to the second extracellular loop of ß1-AR, we observed sequential changes in the hearts. As early as 1 month after starting immunization, autoantibodies against the second extracellular loop of ß1-ARs were persistently detected in both ß and ß+biso rabbits. These autoantibodies exert agonist-like actions on ß1-ARs. At 3 months, mononuclear cell infiltrates were noted in both ß and ß+biso rabbits, whereas ß-AR uncoupling with increased GRK5 expression was observed only in the ß rabbits. These findings suggest that cellular inflammation with infiltrates does not account for ß-AR uncoupling and may be a nonspecific immune reaction. Whereas cellular infiltration in the hearts subsided at 6 months, LV hypertrophy with altered cardiac function occurred in the ß rabbits. Profound ß-AR desensitization was noted in the ß rabbits and was accompanied by decreased ß1-AR density and increased Gi protein as well as GRK5 expression, although there was no difference in the plasma norepinephrine concentration in the 3 groups. These results suggest that sustained sympathomimetic actions of the autoantibodies may at least partly account for ß-AR signaling abnormalities and myocardial hypertrophy, because isoproterenol increases GRK8 and Gi{alpha}6 expression, and induces cardiomyocyte hypertrophy.7 9

Matsui et al22 have demonstrated autoimmune-mediated cardiomyopathy by immunizing rabbits for up to 12 months with the peptide. Biventricular dilation occurred with upregulation of ß-AR in immunized rabbits, which differs from the findings of the present study. Differences in the immunization period as well as in adjuvant composition or species differences may account for the inconsistent results. Preliminary results from our laboratory have revealed that cavity dilation is not observed in rabbits immunized for up to 12 months. In addition, at 12 months, LV hypertrophy is no longer present and total ß-AR density was significantly decreased in ß rabbits in association with increased plasma norepinephrine concentrations. It is possible that such phenomena may represent an early stage of dilated cardiomyopathy. The different results in the ß-AR assay could be attributable to differential enrichment of cell membranes due to the filtration methods used in preparation.

Alterations in ß-Adrenergic Signaling Associated With Autoimmunity
Previous experiments in vitro have shown that incubation of neonatal rat ventricular myocytes with autoantibodies against ß1-ARs decreases ß1-AR protein and mRNA expression.23 This is consistent with the present findings at 6 months, although this finding was preceded by an increase in the GRK5 protein. GRKs have a key role in modulating myocardial adrenergic signaling and cardiac function.8 13 14 GRK5 and GRK2 are enzymes normally expressed in the heart that are rapidly activated after agonist occupancy of receptors. These kinases phosphorylate the receptors, resulting in receptor–G protein uncoupling. Iaccarino et al8 showed that ß-AR stimulation with isoproterenol increases expression of GRK2 but not GRK5 in mice. One previous study also showed increased GRK2 but not GRK5 expression in failing rabbit heart after myocardial infarction,24 whereas another study demonstrated increased GRK5 but not GRK2 expression in a porcine pacing-induced model of heart failure, suggesting that increased GRK5 expression may be one of the earliest changes in heart failure.25 Ping et al26 reported that although chronic inhibition of ß1-AR activation by bisoprolol resulted in downregulation of GRK activity in porcine heart, no change in immunodetectable GRK2 was found, suggesting that reduced GRK5 expression might be responsible for the decreased GRK activity. Thus, it seems possible that selective stimulation of ß1-ARs by the autoantibodies is partly responsible for the predominant expression of GRK5 in the present study. According to the previous study,8 GRK2 expression may also increase as the plasma norepinephrine concentration increases in the present model. Actually, GRK2 tended to increase in the membrane fraction from ß rabbits at 6 months. Choi et al14 reported that although pressure-overload cardiac hypertrophy is associated with increased GRK activity, sympathoadrenal activation but not cellular hypertrophy is responsible for the increased GRK activity, which is consistent with our findings at 3 months.

Although relationships between ß-AR stimulation6 or heart failure11 23 27 and Gi{alpha} have been reported, those between autoimmunity and Gi expression have not previously. In the present study, increased Gi protein, coupled with decreased ß1-AR density or increased GRK5, was responsible for the profound decrease in cAMP production related to altered cardiac function at 6 months. According to a previous report,28 increased Gi protein, unlike GRK5, may be related to myocardial hypertrophy, although this issue was not clarified in the present study.

Study Limitation and Clinical Implications
We checked cross-reaction of autoantibodies with other cardiac proteins in Western blots using rabbit cardiac ventricular homogenates to confirm the specificity of autoimmunity against ß1-ARs. We could not detect ß-ARs clearly, possibly because of their low expression. Therefore, we immunized rabbits together with bisoprolol treatment to confirm that the partial agonist autoantibodies were effecting cardiac toxicity via ß1-ARs. Cardiomyopathic changes induced by autoimmunity in the present study may involve various factors, including humoral and cellular immunity, and neurohumoral factors such as catecholamines or cytokines. Because there are complex interrelationships among them, it is difficult to specify the exact cause of an individual change. We observed 2 time points for sequential changes in the hearts in addition to bisoprolol treatment and attempted to identify the mechanisms of cardiomyopathic changes seen in the present study.

Bisoprolol prevented ß-AR desensitization and myocardial hypertrophy induced by autoimmunity in the present study. Bisoprolol appears to eliminate toxicity from the partial agonist autoantibodies, rather than toxicity from elevated plasma levels of norepinephrine, because there was no difference in plasma norepinephrine concentration in the 3 groups over the observation period. Based on the fact that the second extracellular domain of ß-ARs, although not the normal ligand binding site, includes disulfide-bonded cysteine residues and plays an role in ligand affinity regulation and receptor activation,29 it is speculated that autoantibody binding to the domain may induce the conformational change of the receptor to an active state.2 On the other hand, although the binding site of ligands such as ß-adrenergic antagonists resides within the hydrophobic transmembrane domains of the receptor,29 functional assays demonstrated that bisoprolol has an inverse agonist activity, which is the agonist-independent modulation of receptor activity inducing an inactive conformation with loss of the active state.21 This suggests that the 2-state model of G protein–coupled receptor activation21 could explain our results and that inverse agonism rather than direct interaction with autoantibodies may be responsible for the protective effects of bisoprolol in the present study. General hemodynamic effects of ß blockers appear insufficient to account for the protective effects of bisoprolol in the present study because the effects on ß-adrenergic signaling have been apparent at 3 months when there is no difference in any of the hemodynamic parameters among the 3 groups. The elimination of agonist-like actions of the autoantibodies by bisoprolol may also prevent myocardial expression of proinflammatory cytokines induced by chronic ß-adrenergic stimulation, which are believed to have key roles in the pathophysiology of congestive heart failure,30 although there is no evidence to support this hypothesis in the present study.

The present results suggest a possible mechanism by which the removal of the autoantibodies through immunoglobulin adsorption improves cardiac performance in patients with cardiomyopathy.5 In this regard, ß blockers, especially with inverse agonism, as well as immunoglobulin adsorption, could be rational therapeutic tools for patients with cardiomyopathy who have autoantibodies directed against the second extracellular domain of ß1-ARs.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This study was supported in part by Grants 09670748 (to T.Y.) and 12770356 (to M.I.) from the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture of Japan, and by funds from the Idiopathic Cardiomyopathy Research Group of the Ministry of Health and Welfare of Japan. We thank Yukio Shimoguchi for technical assistance in histological analysis.


*    Footnotes
 
Original received September 29, 2000; revision received February 1, 2001; accepted February 1, 2001.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Richardson P, McKenna W, Bristow M, Maisch B, Mautner B, O’Connell J, Olsen E, Thiene G, Goodwin J, Gyarfas I, Martin I, Nordet P. Report of the 1995 World Health Organization/International Society and Federation of Cardiology Task Force on the Definition and Classification of Cardiomyopathies. Circulation. 1996;93:841–842.[Free Full Text]
  2. Magnusson Y, Wallukat G, Waagstein F, Hjalmarson Å, Hoebeke J. Autoimmunity in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 1994;89:2760–2767.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Iwata M, Yoshikawa T, Baba A, Anzai T, Mitamura H, Ogawa S. Autoantibodies against the second extracellular loop of ß1-adrenergic receptors predict ventricular tachycardia and sudden death in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:418–424.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Peukert S, Fu ML, Eftekhari P, Poepping I, Voss A, Thalhammer C, Hempel A, Menz M, Dietz R, Osterziel KJ. The frequency of occurrence of anti-cardiac receptor autoantibodies and their correlation with clinical manifestation in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Autoimmunity. 1999;29:291–297.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Müller J, Wallukat G, Dandel M, Bieda H, Brandes K, Spiegelsberger S, Nissen E, Kunze R, Hetzer R. Immunoglobulin adsorption in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 2000;101:385–391.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Müller FU, Boheler KR, Eschenhagen T, Schmitz W, Scholz H. Isoprenaline stimulates gene transcription of the inhibitory G protein {alpha}-subunit Gi{alpha}-2 in the rat heart. Circ Res. 1993;72:696–700.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Kudej RK, Iwase M, Uechi M, Vatner DE, Oka N, Ishikawa Y, Shannon RP, Bishop SP, Vatner SF. Effects of chronic ß-adrenergic receptor stimulation in mice. J Moll Cell Cardiol. 1997;29:2735–2746.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Iaccarino G, Tomhave ED, Lefkowitz RJ, Koch WJ. Reciprocal in vivo regulation of myocardial G protein-coupled receptor kinase expression by ß-adrenergic receptor stimulation and blockade. Circulation. 1998;98:1783–1789.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Yamazaki T, Komuro I, Zou Y, Kudoh S, Shiojima I, Hiroi Y, Mizuno T, Aikawa R, Takano H, Yazaki Y. Norepinephrine induces the raf-1 kinase/mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade through both {alpha}1- and ß-adrenoceptors. Circulation. 1997;95:1260–1268.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Bristow MR. ß-Adrenergic receptor blockade in chronic heart failure. Circulation. 2000;101:558–569.[Free Full Text]
  11. Böhm M, Gierschik P, Jakobs KH, Pieske B, Schnabel P, Ungerer M, Erdmann E. Increase of Gi{alpha} in human hearts with dilated but not ischemic cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 1990;82:1249–1265.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Choudhury L, Rosen SD, Lefroy DC, Nihoyannopoulos P, Okaley CM, Camici PG. Myocardial ß adrenoceptor density in primary and secondary left ventricular hypertrophy. Eur Heart J. 1996;17:1703–1709.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Cho MC, Rapacciuolo A, Koch WJ, Kobayashi Y, Joens LR, Rockman HA. Defective ß-adrenergic receptor signaling precedes the development of dilated cardiomyopathy in transgenic mice with calsequestrin overexpression. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:22251–22256.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Choi DJ, Koch WJ, Hunter JJ, Rockman HA. Mechanism of ß-adrenergic receptor desensitization in cardiac hypertrophy is increased ß-adrenergic receptor kinase. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:17223–17229.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. CIBIS-II Investigators, and Committees. The Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study II (CIBIS-II): randomized trial. Lancet. 1999;353:9–13.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. MERIT-HF Study Group. Effect of metoprolol CR/XL in chronic heart failure: Metoprolol CR/XL Randomized Intervention Trial in Congestive Heart Failure (MERIT-HF). Lancet. 1999;353:2001–2007.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Kim MH, Devlin WH, Das SK, Petrusha J, Montgomery D, Starling MR. Effects of ß-adrenergic blocking therapy on left ventricular diastolic relaxation properties in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 1999;100:729–735.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Haeusler G, Schliep HJ, Schelling P, Becker KH, Klockow M, Minck KO, Enenkel HJ, Schulze E, Bergmann R, Schmitges CJ, Seyfried C, Harting J. High ß1-selectivity and favourable pharmacokinetics as the outstanding properties of bisoprolol. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1986;8:S2–S15.
  19. Anzai T, Yoshikawa T, Baba A, Nishimura H, Shiraki H, Nagami K, Suzuki M, Wainai Y, Ogawa S. Myocardial sympathetic denervation prevents chamber-specific alteration of ß-adrenergic transmembrane signaling in rabbits with heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;28:1314–1322.[Abstract]
  20. Anzai T, Lai CL, Gao M, Hammond HK. Dissociation between regional dysfunction and ß-adrenergic receptor signaling in heart failure. Am J Physiol. 1998;275:H1267–H1273.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Bond RA, Leff P, Johnson TD, Milano CA, Rockman HA, McMinn TR, Apparsundaram S, Hyek MF, Kenakin TP, Allen LF, Lefkowitz RJ. Physiological effects of inverse agonists in transgenic mice with myocardial overexpression of the ß2-adrenoceptor. Nature. 1995;374:272–276.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Matsui S, Fu MLX, Katsuda S, Hayase M, Yamaguchi N. Peptides derived from cardiovascular G-protein-coupled receptors induce morphological cardiomyopathic changes in immunized rabbits. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1997;29:641–655.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Podlowski S, Luther HP, Morwinski R, Müller J, Wallukat G. Agonistic anti-ß1-adrenergic receptor autoantibodies from cardiomyopathy patients reduce the ß1-adrenergic receptor expression in neonatal rat cardiomyocytes. Circulation. 1998;98:2470–2476.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Maurice JP, Shah AS, Kypson AP, Hata JA, White DC, Glower DD, Koch WJ. Molecular ß-adrenergic signaling abnormalities in failing rabbit hearts after infarction. Am J Physiol. 1999;276:H1853–H1860.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Ping P, Anzai T, Gao M, Hammond HK. Adenylyl cyclase and G protein receptor kinase expression during development of heart failure. Am J Physiol. 1997;273:H707–H717.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Ping P, Gelzer-Bell R, Roth DA, Kiel D, Insel PA, Hammond HK. Reduced ß-adrenergic receptor activation decreases G-protein expression and ß-adrenergic receptor kinase activity in porcine heart. J Clin Invest. 1995;95:1271–1280.
  27. Feldman AM, Cates AE, Veazey WB, Hershberger RE, Bristow MR, Baughman KL, Baumgartner WA, Van Dop C. Increase of the 40,000-mol wt pertussis toxin substrate (G protein) in the failing human heart. J Clin Invest. 1988;82:189–197.
  28. Daaka Y, Luttrell LM, Lefkowitz RJ. Switching of the coupling of the ß2-adrenergic receptor to different G proteins by protein kinase A. Nature. 1997;390:88–91.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Strader CD, Fong TM, Tota MR, Underwood D. Structure and function of G protein-coupled receptors. Annu Rev Biochem. 1994;63:101–132.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Murray DR, Prabhu SD, Chandrasekar B. Chronic ß-adrenergic stimulation induces myocardial proinflammatory cytokine expression. Circulation. 2000;101:2338–2341. [Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
W. Mao, S. Fukuoka, C. Iwai, J. Liu, V. K. Sharma, S.-S. Sheu, M. Fu, and C.-s. Liang
Cardiomyocyte apoptosis in autoimmune cardiomyopathy: mediated via endoplasmic reticulum stress and exaggerated by norepinephrine
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2007; 293(3): H1636 - H1645.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
Y. Fukuda, S. Miyoshi, K. Tanimoto, K. Oota, K. Fujikura, M. Iwata, A. Baba, Y. Hagiwara, T. Yoshikawa, H. Mitamura, et al.
Autoimmunity against the second extracellular loop of beta1-adrenergic receptors induces early afterdepolarization and decreases in K-channel density in rabbits
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 17, 2004; 43(6): 1090 - 1100.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
G. Wallukat, J. Muller, and R. Hetzer
Specific Removal of {beta}1-Adrenergic Autoantibodies from Patients with Idiopathic Dilated Cardiomyopathy
N. Engl. J. Med., November 28, 2002; 347(22): 1806 - 1806.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
H.-R. Liu, R.-R. Zhao, X.-Y. Jiao, Y.-Y. Wang, and M. Fu
Relationship of myocardial remodeling to the genesis of serum autoantibodies to cardiac beta1-adrenoceptors and muscarinic type 2 acetylcholine receptors in rats
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 5, 2002; 39(11): 1866 - 1873.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Iwata, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ogawa, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Iwata, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ogawa, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Biochemistry and metabolism
Right arrow Heart failure - basic studies
Right arrow Myocardial cardiomyopathy disease