Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation Research
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation Research. 2001;88:422-429

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Takahashi, T.
Right arrow Articles by Kitagawa, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Takahashi, T.
Right arrow Articles by Kitagawa, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Growth factors/cytokines
Right arrow Endothelium/vascular type/nitric oxide
Right arrow Mechanism of atherosclerosis/growth factors
(Circulation Research. 2001;88:422.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.


Cellular Biology

Activation of Human Neutrophil by Cytokine-Activated Endothelial Cells

Tatsuji Takahashi, Fumihiko Hato, Takahisa Yamane, Hiroshi Fukumasu, Kenichi Suzuki, Sachio Ogita, Yoshiki Nishizawa, Seiichi Kitagawa

From the Second Department of Physiology (T.T., F.H., K.S., S.K.), Department of Clinical Hematology (T.Y.), Second Department of Internal Medicine (T.T., Y.N.), and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (H.F., S.O.), Osaka City University Medical School, Osaka, Japan.

Correspondence to Tatsuji Takahashi, MD, Second Department of Physiology, Osaka City University Medical School, 1-4-3, Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan. E-mail m8515397{at}med.osaka-cu.ac.jp


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Abstract—Cytokine activation of vascular endothelial cells renders the hyperadhesiveness for neutrophils. During the processes of inflammation and atherosclerosis, the production of reactive oxygen species by neutrophils contributes to endothelial cell (EC) damage and injury. However, the precise mechanisms for neutrophil activation by ECs remain unknown. Thus, we investigated what kinds of pathophysiological factors synthesized by inflammatory cytokine-activated ECs potentiated the activity of neutrophil functions. The magnitude of O2- release from neutrophils, which is one of pivotal neutrophil functions, was measured as an indicator potentiated by activated ECs. Neutrophils release massive amounts of O2- on coculture with activated ECs. Anti–granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) antibody (Ab) or specific platelet-activating factor (PAF)-receptor antagonist suppressed the O2- release from neutrophils on coculture with the activated ECs by 50% to 70%. The supernatants from activated ECs also induced O2- release by neutrophils. This stimulatory effect of activated EC supernatants on O2- release by neutrophils was abolished by anti–GM-CSF Ab or by PAF-receptor antagonist. As we previously reported, we demonstrated the expression of GM-CSF mRNA by Northern blotting and protein synthesis of GM-CSF by ELISA on tumor necrosis factor as well as interleukin-1–activated ECs. Although phosphorylation of mitogen-activated protein kinases was observed in ECs stimulated by tumor necrosis factor and interleukin-1, treatment of ECs with PD98059 (MEK1 inhibitor) and SB203580 (p38 mitogen–activated protein kinase inhibitor) in the presence of the cytokine failed to attenuate the stimulatory effect of activated ECs on neutrophil activation. We found that activated ECs regulated neutrophil function on coculture. We show here for the first time, to our knowledge, that the collaboration between GM-CSF and PAF synthesized by activated ECs markedly potentiated neutrophil activation.


Key Words: endothelial cell • neutrophil • granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor • platelet-activating factor • intercellular adhesion molecule-1


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Vascular endothelial cells (ECs) are the gatekeepers of the tissues from the perspective of the bloodstream, and alterations of the endothelium are important determinants in regulating traffic of circulating cells and molecules into various tissues.1 At the sites of inflammation and atherosclerosis, proinflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin-1 (IL-1) and tumor necrosis factor (TNF), and other mediators play crucial roles in cell-cell interactions.2 The cytokine network also plays a role in mediating the host inflammatory response. This response may occur via the increased expression of leukocyte adherence molecules on the surface of ECs as well as through elaboration of chemoattractant substances. Activated ECs may acquire the capacity to perform new functions, and this process is the result of quantitative changes in certain gene products.3 The actions of IL-1 and TNF on ECs that promote leukocyte adhesion and activation are likely to be of importance in the development of inflammatory responses in vitro and in vivo.4 IL-1 or TNF-activated ECs also generate activators of neutrophils, such as granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), IL-1, platelet-activating factor (PAF), and IL-8.5 6

TNF and IL-1 could induce strong activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) 3 subtypes of human ECs.7 8 The MAPKs extracellular signal–regulated kinase (ERK), p38 MAPK, and c-Jun N-terminal kinase/stress-activated protein kinase (JNK/SAPK) seem to be central elements of 3 homologous pathways used by mammalian cells to transduce the messages generated by stressing agents as well as growth factors. We have demonstrated that PD98059, which blocks the phosphorylation of ERK1/2 via inhibition of MEK1/2, and SB203580, which blocks the enzyme activity of p38 MAPK, markedly reduced the magnitude of GM-CSF and TNF-induced O2- release by neutrophils.9 Thus, phosphorylation of MAPK may be required for neutrophil activation in response to TNF and GM-CSF.

GM-CSF, a member of the hematopoietic growth factor family, is produced and released by monocytes, macrophages, T cells,10 fibroblasts, vascular smooth muscle cells,11 and ECs in response to IL-112 and TNF.13 In addition to its growth-promoting effects, GM-CSF stimulates a range of functional activities of mature neutrophils,14 15 monocytes, and eosinophils,16 including regulation of leukocyte adhesion, augmentation of surface antigen expression, O2- release, and enhancement or induction of cytokine production.17 GM-CSF produced by ECs plays an important role in the regulation of blood-vessel function.

PAF (1-O-alkyl-2-acetyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine) is also a highly potent phospholipid mediator of inflammation and cell-cell interaction.18 19 Newly synthesized PAF on the activated EC surface may act at the beginning of an inflammatory cascade as a mediator that amplifies and propagates the reaction.20 21

Thus, leukocyte activation is a key feature of the progression associated with atherosclerosis as well as inflammation. However, little is known about the role of interaction between ECs and neutrophils in the development of inflammation and atherosclerosis. The magnitude of O2- release from neutrophils, as an indicator of the respiratory burst, was considered to be a marker potentiated by ECs. In the present study, we investigated what kinds of mediators synthesized by ECs caused the neutrophil activation.


*    Materials and Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Materials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Reagents and Cells
PAF (C16: 1-O-alkyl-2-acetyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine), cytochrome c type III, superoxide dismutase, 3,7-dimethyl-1-propargylxanthine (DMPX), and adenosine deaminase (ADA) were obtained from Sigma Chemical. Highly purified recombinant human GM-CSF, TNF-{alpha}, and IL-1ß produced by Escherichia coli were provided by Schering-Plough, Dainippon Pharmaceutical, and Otsuka Pharmaceutical, respectively. Polyclonal sheep anti-human GM-CSF antibody (Ab) was provided by Schering-Plough. PD98059 and rabbit polyclonal antibodies against Thr202/Tyr204-phosphorylated ERK1/2, Thr180/Tyr182-phosphorylated p38, and Thr183/Tyr185-phosphorylated JNK1/2 were obtained from New England Biolabs. SB203580 was provided by SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals. Specific PAF receptor antagonists, YM264 and WEB2170, were gifts from Yamanouchi Research Institute (Osaka, Japan) and Boeringer Ingelheim (Ingelheim, German), respectively. Human ECs from umbilical cord vein, prepared and characterized as previously described,22 were grown on 2.5% gelatin-precoated 60-mm tissue culture petri dishes (Nunc). The immunofluorescent staining for factor VIII was confirmed. Neutrophils were prepared as described.9 The final cell concentration was 6x106 cells/mL.

Activated EC-Neutrophil Interaction and O2- Release Assay
Confluent EC monolayers at passages 2 through 5 were removed from the dishes, and 1.5x105 ECs were seeded onto gelatin-precoated 24-well plates. TNF and IL-1 were added to the wells at the indicated concentrations, and the plates were incubated for 4 hours at 37°C. The wells were gently washed 3 times with warmed HBSS. When TNF and IL-1–pretreated EC monolayers were fixed with 1% paraformaldehyde, the fixed ECs were thoroughly washed 3 times. Reaction buffers (0.2 mL) were added to each well. Then neutrophils (6x105 cells) were placed in contact with EC monolayers (0.4 mL/well). When supernatants from activated ECs or coculture were required, the buffers (0.2 mL/well) were added alone. If the supernatants, cytokine, or mediator-induced O2- release by neutrophils were measured, neutrophils (3x105 cells) were put on FCS-precoated 48-well plates. The plates were incubated for 3 hours at 37°C. The wells were aspirated, and the supernatants were centrifuged to remove cells. As previously described,9 23 the O2- release was determined as superoxide dismutase–inhibitable reduction of ferricytochrome c. Results from duplicate wells were averaged.

Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 Expression Study
Confluent ECs treated with or without IL-1 and TNF at the indicated concentrations were harvested at the indicated time and incubated for 30 minutes at 4 °C with either monoclonal Ab (84H10) directed against intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) conjugated with FITC or IgG1 (Sigma Chemical) as control Ab. Membrane antigen expression of activated ECs was analyzed by a flow cytometer (FACScalibur, Becton Dickinson).

Western Blotting
As previously described,9 human umbilical vein ECs (HUVECs) were stimulated by cytokines for the indicated time. The blots were incubated with appropriate Ab. The membrane was incubated with anti-rabbit lgG Ab conjugated with horseradish peroxidase, and the Ab complexes were visualized using the ECL detection system as directed by the manufacturer.

Statistical Analysis
Results are presented as mean±SEM. Differences between groups were analyzed with unpaired Student’s t test. P<0.05 was considered significant.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Cytokine-Activated EC-Neutrophil Interaction
Our results showed that activated ECs potentiate massive amounts of O2- release from neutrophils (Figure 1ADown). This indicates that activated ECs augmented the activity of neutrophil function. The activity of ECs treated with the combination of IL-1 (8.19±1.17 nmol/6x105cells per 3 hours) and TNF (10.82±1.49 nmol/6x105cells per 3 hours) was subadditive (13.86±3.64 nmol/6x105cells per 3 hours). Our results demonstrated that the amount of O2- release from neutrophils on the coculture was dependent on the concentration of IL-1 or TNF used to activate ECs (Figure 1BDown). IL-1–treated ECs evoked neutrophil activation at low concentration and rapidly reached the plateau, whereas TNF-treated ECs slowly caused neutrophil activation. The O2- release gradually increased with time (data not shown). In our assay, the amount of O2- release in neutrophils stimulated by TNF-{alpha} (100 U/mL=39.2 ng/mL) or GM-CSF (5 ng/mL), which is the optimal concentration, was 5.86±0.35 or 4.19±0.26 nmol/3x105cells per 3 hours, respectively.9 ECs did not release O2- in response to these cytokines.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Cytokine-activated ECs induce O2- release from neutrophils. ECs (1.5x105 cells) were untreated or pretreated with IL-1ß (1.25 ng/mL) or TNF-{alpha} (39.22 ng/mL) for 4 hours, washed, and then cocultured with neutrophils (6x105 cells) for 3 hours. Human neutrophils spontaneously released O2- in the presence of IL-1ß–activated or TNF-{alpha}–activated ECs (A). CTL (control) indicates untreated ECs. Furthermore, the amount of O2- release from neutrophils on the cocultures with ECs pretreated with the indicated dose of IL-1ß or TNF-{alpha} at 4 hours was examined (B). Results represent >=5 separate experiments, each done in duplicate. *P<0.05 and **P<0.01 compared with CTL.

Supernatants From Activated ECs or Coculture Induced O2- Release by Neutrophils
The supernatants from activated ECs alone could induced O2- release by neutrophils (IL-1, 2.47±0.35; TNF, 3.21±0.43; and IL-1+TNF, 4.77±0.92 nmol/3x105cells per 3 hours) as potent as the supernatants from coculture (IL-1, 2.25±0.31; TNF, 3.42±0.54; and IL-1+TNF, 4.92±0.98 nmol/3x105cells per 3 hours) (Figure 2Down). The supernatants on coculture with neutrophils did not synergistically augment the amount of O2- release from neutrophils in comparison with monocytes.22



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Effect of supernatants from activated ECs and coculture between activated ECs and neutrophils on neutrophil activation. ECs were untreated or pretreated with IL-1ß (1.25 ng/mL) or TNF-{alpha} (39.22 ng/mL) for 4 hours, washed, and then incubated with or without neutrophils (6x105 cells) for 3 hours at 37°C. The conditioned medium was aspirated, and the supernatants were centrifuged to remove cells. After 3 hours of incubation with supernatants (50%), the O2- release by neutrophils (3x105cells) was measured as described in Materials and Methods. Data are representative of 5 independent experiments, each done in duplicate. *P<0.01 compared with CTL.

Phosphorylation of MAPK 3 Subtypes in IL-1–Activated or TNF-Activated ECs
The results presented in Figure 3Down show that all 3 MAPKs (ERK1/2, p38, and JNK1/2) in ECs were phosphorylated in response to IL-1 (1.25 ng/mL) or TNF (39.2 ng/mL) in agreement with previous studies.7 8 Both IL-1 and TNF activated ERK1/2, p38, and JNK1/2 in ECs.



View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Activation of MAPK 3 subtypes in response to TNF and IL-1. HUVECs were exposed for 10 minutes to TNF (39.22 ng/mL) or IL-1 (1.25 ng/mL). Phosphorylation of ERK1/2, p38 MAPK, and JNK1/2 was analyzed by immunoblotting using Ab against phosphorylated form of each protein (A through C). The cell lysates equivalent to 2x106 cells were loaded onto each lane. Immunoblots of total ERK1/2, p38 MAPK, and JNK1/2 were performed to confirm equal protein loading. Data are representative of 3 separate experiments. IB indicates immunoblotting.

Neutrophils Adherent to Cytokine-Activated ECs
After 5 minutes of coculture, nonadherent neutrophils were removed. Neutrophils bound to ECs were washed 3 times with warmed HBSS and fixed with 1% paraformaldehyde. The number of neutrophils adherent to ECs was counted using a phase-contrast microscope (Nikon Diaphot). The number of neutrophils was markedly increased in adherence to activated ECs (IL-1, 34.3±5.8; TNF, 52.2±8.6; and IL-1+TNF, 82.6±10.4 cells/field), as shown in Figure 4ADown. Furthermore, we analyzed ICAM-1 expression on the surface of IL-1–activated or TNF-activated ECs by FACS, and ICAM-1 expression on IL-1–activated or TNF-activated ECs was upregulated in a dose- and time-dependent manner in agreement with previous studies (Figures 4BDown and 4CDown).24



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Neutrophils adherent to activated ECs and ICAM-1 expression on IL-1–activated or TNF-activated ECs. We counted the number of neutrophils adherent to activated ECs with a phase-contrast microscopy after 5 minutes of coculture (A). ICAM-1 expression on TNF (39.22 ng/mL)-activated ECs for indicated time was analyzed by FACS (B). After ECs were treated with the indicated concentration of the cytokine for 4 hours, ICAM-1 expression was analyzed (C). M.F.I. indicates mean fluorescence intensity. Results represent 4 separate experiments. *P<0.05 compared with CTL.

We next investigated the involvement of ICAM-1–mediated signaling events during neutrophil adherence in the increase of O2- release from neutrophils. ECs were fixed to prevent the formation of de novo–generated EC mediators in accordance with previous studies.16 25 26 In agreement with previous studies, the ability of viable neutrophils to undergo adhesion in response to cytokines was not impaired in the presence of fixed ECs (data not shown). Cytokine-treated fixed ECs had higher levels of adhesion molecules, including ICAM-1, on their surfaces than control-fixed ECs (Figures 4BUp and 4CUp). The magnitude of O2- release from neutrophils on incubation with the cytokine-treated fixed ECs in the presence of activated ECs supernatants was significantly greater than that on incubation with nontreated fixed ECs (Figure 5ADown). Cytokine-treated fixed ECs also augmented the recombinant human (rh) GM-CSF (50 or 500 pg/mL)–induced O2- release by neutrophils but not other doses of rh GM-CSF (5 pg/mL and 5 ng/mL) (Figure 5BDown). However, this enhancement of adhesion to activated ECs in O2- release by neutrophils was small. On the other hand, eosinophil adhesion to VCAM-1 markedly enhanced O2- release.16 26 The amount of O2- release from neutrophils in contact with TNF-activated fixed ECs gradually increased in a manner dependent on the dose and time used to activate ECs (data not shown).



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Fixed EC-neutrophil interaction assay. TNF-treated or IL-1–treated EC monolayers (1.5x105 cells) were fixed with 1% paraformaldehyde for 30 minutes and washed 3 times thoroughly. After neutrophils (6x105 cells) were incubated with nontreated or cytokine-treated fixed ECs in the presence of supernatants from activated ECs (A) and rh GM-CSF (B) for 3 hours, the amount of O2- release was measured. CTL-fixed, IL-1–fixed, and TNF-fixed ECs indicate nontreated, IL-1ß (1.25 ng/mL)–treated, and TNF-{alpha} (39.22 ng/mL)–treated fixed ECs, respectively. Results represent 4 separate experiments, each done in duplicate. CTL-EC sup, IL-1-EC sup, and TNF-EC sup indicate supernatant from nonactivated, IL-1–activated, and TNF-activated ECs, respectively. *P<0.05, #P<0.05, and §P<0.05 compared with CTL-EC sup, IL-1-EC sup on CTL-fixed ECs, and TNF-EC sup on CTL-fixed ECs, respectively. {dagger}P<0.05 compared with the absence of rh GM-CSF. ¶P<0.05 compared with CTL-fixed ECs.

The results shown in Figures 5AUp and 5BUp indicate that the amount of O2- release from neutrophils induced by activated-EC supernatants was identical with that induced by nonglycosylated GM-CSF (50 pg/mL) from E. coli. Because the stimulatory effect of rh GM-CSF from E. coli was greater than that of GM-CSF from mammalian cells on a molar basis,14 nonglycosylated GM-CSF (50 pg/mL) from E. coli is equivalent to glycosylated GM-CSF (500 pg/mL) from HUVECs. Taken together, these results suggest that cytokine-activated ECs might release an equivalent of {approx}500 pg/mL GM-CSF present in supernatants.

Effects of Various Inhibitors on EC-Neutrophil Interaction and Supernatant-Induced O2- Release Assays
Neutralizing Ab against GM-CSF (55 µg/mL) and a specific PAF receptor antagonist (YM264 2.5x10-5 mol/L) inhibited the amount of O2- release from neutrophils on coculture with activated ECs by 60% to 70% and, to a lesser degree, by 50% to 60%, respectively (Figure 6ADown). The inhibitory effects of PAF receptor antagonists (YM264 and WEB2170) on the O2- release were dependent on the concentration, and YM264 was more potent than WEB2170, in agreement with a previous study (data not shown).27 Anti–GM-CSF Ab and YM264 almost completely abolished the O2- release from neutrophils induced by activated EC supernatants (Figure 6BDown). It is suggested that supernatants from cytokine-activated ECs contain soluble factors that are predominantly GM-CSF and PAF. Neither YM264 nor WEB2170 had any effect on control or TNF-primed N-formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine–induced O2- release by neutrophils.



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Effects of various inhibitors on EC-neutrophil interaction and supernatant-induced O2- release assays. The magnitudes of O2- release from neutrophils on coculture between cytokine-treated ECs (1.5x105 cells) and neutrophils (6x105 cells) in the absence or presence of anti–GM-CSF Ab (55 µg/mL), YM264 (2.5x10-5 mol/L), PD98059 (1x10-5 and 5x10-5 mol/L), SB203580 (1x10-6 and 1x10-7 mol/L), ADA (1.18 µg/mL), and DMPX (2.5x10-5 mol/L) for 3 hours were measured (A). After neutrophils (3x105 cells) were incubated with activated EC supernatant in the absence or presence of various inhibitors, the O2- release was measured (B). PD indicates PD98059; SB, SB203580. Results represent >=3 independent experiments, each done in duplicate. *P<0.05 compared with the absence of inhibitors.

Because IL-1 and TNF activated MAPK, as shown in Figure 3Up, we investigated the involvement of MAPK cascade in ECs in neutrophil activation. We have demonstrated that PD98059 and SB203580 reduced the magnitude of GM-CSF–induced and TNF-induced O2- release by neutrophils.9 When PD98059 and SB203580 were added to EC monolayers 15 minutes before the treatment with IL-1 or TNF, treated for 4 hours, and then washed, the amounts of O2- release on the coculture between PD98059- and SB203580-treated activated ECs and neutrophils for 3 hours were not altered in comparison with the coculture between activated ECs and neutrophils (data not shown). Although both PD98059 and SB203580 suppressed the O2- release by neutrophils on the coculture, in agreement with our previous study9 (Figure 6AUp), the pretreatment of activated ECs with both PD98059 and SB203580 had no significant effect on the activity of neutrophil function. The results indicate that MAPK cascade might have an association with neutrophil activation but not with EC activation in response to inflammatory cytokines.

It is well established that ECs exposed to hypoxic conditions have an altered phenotype,28 as demonstrated by increase in adenosine production. Adenosine inhibits priming of neutrophils and the respiratory burst of cytokine-triggered adherent neutrophils via A2 receptor.29 To test whether adenosine derived from ECs attenuates neutrophil activation, we examined the effect of 2 adenosine inhibitors, DMPX, which is an A2-specific receptor antagonist, and ADA, which can deaminate adenosine to inosine, on the O2- release from neutrophils on coculture. As shown in Figures 6AUp and 6BUp, the inhibitory effects of adenosine were partially but not significantly blocked by both DMPX (2.5x10-5 mol/L) and ADA (1.25 ng/mL). These data indicate that adenosine did not mediate the activity of neutrophil function by cytokine-treated ECs compared with ischemia/reperfusion-treated ECs. Blocking monoclonal Ab against ICAM-1 (84H10, Immunotech) did not significantly inhibit the O2- release from neutrophils on the coculture (data not shown).

GM-CSF Production of Activated ECs
HUVECs spontaneously released low levels of GM-CSF (16.9±2.7 pg/mL) under control conditions. The concentrations of GM-CSF produced by IL-1ß (1.25 ng/mL) and TNF-{alpha} (39.2 ng/mL)–activated ECs were 317.6±22.8 and 421.5±39.4 pg/mL, respectively. When ECs were treated with the combination of IL-1 and TNF, the additive response in the production of GM-CSF from activated ECs was observed (758.3±81.4 pg/mL). The levels of GM-CSF production by activated ECs in the presence of SB203580 (1x10-6 mol/L) were higher than those in the absence of SB203580; however, there were no significant differences of GM-CSF production by IL-1–activated and TNF-activated ECs in the presence or absence of SB203580 or PD98059. Similar to ICAM-1 expression on the surface of ECs, the levels of GM-CSF production by activated ECs were dependent on cytokine concentration used to activate ECs (data not shown). The coculture between IL-1ß or TNF-{alpha}–activated ECs and neutrophils had no significant increase in GM-CSF production (data not shown).

Effect of PAF on GM-CSF–Induced O2- Release From Neutrophils
When varying concentrations of exogenous PAF were added in the presence of rh GM-CSF (50 pg/mL), PAF affected nonglycosylated rh GM-CSF (50 pg/mL)–induced O2- release by neutrophils, which is equivalent to the concentration of glycosylated GM-CSF from activated ECs. The maximum enhancement of rh GM-CSF (50 pg/mL)–induced O2- release was elicited by 20 to 50 nmol/L PAF, which was the physiological concentration of PAF synthesized by activated ECs (Figure 8ADown).30 Interestingly, the enhancement of GM-CSF–induced O2- release by exogenous PAF (20 nmol/L) was not obtained at higher level of rh GM-CSF (500 to 5000 pg/mL) compared with the physiological level of GM-CSF produced by activated ECs (Figure 8BDown).31 32



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 8. Effect of exogenous PAF on GM-CSF–induced O2- release from neutrophils. The amounts of nonstimulated or rh GM-CSF (50 pg/mL)–induced O2- release from neutrophils in the absence or presence of varying concentrations of exogenous PAF were measured (A). Neutrophils were incubated with or without varying concentrations of exogenous rh GM-CSF in the absence or presence of PAF (2x10-8 mol/L) for 3 hours (B). Results represent >=3 separate experiments, each done in duplicate. *P<0.05 and #P<0.05 compared with control and 0, respectively.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
IL-1 and TNF have multiple actions on ECs that seem to promote both inflammatory and coagulation responses. Although many TNF activities are indistinguishable from those of IL-1, TNF and IL-1 activities are often additive and always seem to be independent (Figures 1AUp, 2Up, 3AUp, and 7Down).1 The cytokines may promote injury and angiogenesis through indirect actions dependent on leukocytes. Through its effect on major histocompatibility complex (MHC) antigen expression, TNF may promote lymphocyte-dependent inflammation (an action not shared by IL-1). Inflammatory mediators are not always secreted; in some cases, they may be expressed on the cell surface of the stimulated cells. However, whether secreted or surface-expressed, the mediators share a common mode of action: they bind to specific protein receptors on the surface of their target cell.



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. GM-CSF production of activated ECs. PD98059 and SB203580 were added to EC monolayers 15 minutes before treatment, treated with IL-1 or TNF for 4 hours, washed, and then incubated with HBSS for 3 hours. The supernatants were centrifuged to remove cells, and GM-CSF concentrations in the conditioned medium were determined by ELISA (R&D Systems). Results represent 5 separate experiments, each done in duplicate.

TNF and IL-1 could evoke strong activation of MAPK 3 subtypes in HUVECs. ERK is involved in the regulation of transcriptional and translational activities and is essential for control of cell growth and differentiation. p38 MAPK and JNK/SAPK are recognized as stress-sensitive kinases. Our studies indicated a parallel pathway in ECs leading to activation of the p38 MAPK and JNK1/2 in a fashion similar to ERK1/2 activation in response to TNF and IL-1 (Figure 3Up).7 8 Two MAPK inhibitors, both PD98059 and SB203580, had no significant influence on GM-CSF production of the activated ECs (Figure 7Up), whereas PD98059 and SB203580 markedly inhibited the O2- release from neutrophils.9 Although both EC and neutrophil activation have common cascade via ERK and p38 MAPK in response to inflammatory cytokines, the degree of contribution to EC activation via MAPK signaling might be distinct from that to neutrophil activation, or JNK/SAPK might have an important pathway in EC activation in response to TNF and IL-1.

ECs produce PAF in response to TNF and IL-1,18 19 20 whereas thrombin, H2O2, histamine, leukotrienes, and phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate also trigger PAF production.33 Endothelial PAF remains mainly cell-associated and can be recognized by neutrophils that come into contact with the ECs.21 EC-associated PAF is known to participate in regulating neutrophil attachment to activated ECs.34 PAF cooperates with P-selectin and E-selectin in mediating increased neutrophil-EC adherence by triggering an increase in affinity of CD11b/18 (Mac-1).35 36 ECs express ICAM-1 (CD54), a counter-ligand for CD11/18 integrin37 that promotes adhesion and transendothelial migration of neutrophils.38 IL-8, also a potent priming agent for O2- release and phospholipase A2 activation, is known to be produced by TNF or IL-1–treated ECs34 ; however, Hill et al27 have shown that neutralizing Ab against IL-8 was unable to prevent priming of neutrophil function.

In our previous study,22 we demonstrated that GM-CSF mRNA and protein were synergistically expressed on coculture between activated ECs and monocytes, and TNF or IL-1–activated ECs synthesized GM-CSF with maximal production at 4 hours. GM-CSF stimulates a range of functional activities of neutrophils, including regulation of adhesion, augmentation of surface antigen expression, O2- release, and enhancement or induction of cytokine production.39 Thus, it is possible that GM-CSF may contribute to the pathophysiological events involved in atherosclerosis and inflammation. The ability of neutrophils to release large amounts of O2- in response to GM-CSF is presumably controlled by the known receptors for the cytokine.40 GM-CSF also stimulated not only O2- release but also PAF synthesis from neutrophils with time and dose relationships.19 41

Neutrophils are the first inflammatory cells to appear at the site of vessel damage, exacerbating and propagating the inflammatory response. It has also been reported that neutrophils generate reactive oxygen species, which may cause lipid oxidation and lead to serious derangements of cell metabolism, including DNA destruction and modification of proteins,11 thereby contributing to the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Neutrophils also possess a variety of granule proteases suggested to contribute to inflammatory tissue injury.42 The increased adhesion and migration of neutrophils through the endothelium are important events in tissue injury.

The response of O2- release by neutrophils is suppressed by EC-derived adenosine, which possesses anti-inflammatory potential and is most likely mediated through the A2 receptor.43 Therefore, ECs regulated neutrophil activation in the process of inflammation. However, it is unlikely that adenosine from cytokine-activated ECs is associated with neutrophil activation potentiated by activated ECs.

We demonstrated that collaboration between GM-CSF and PAF at physiological concentration is essential to enhance neutrophil activation. The results from both a little enhancement of the O2- release by neutrophil adherence to activated ECs and no significant reduction of the O2- on coculture in the presence of anti-ICAM-1 Ab were obtained. Taken together, soluble factors produced by activated ECs, rather than Mac-1–ICAM-1–mediated signaling events during neutrophil adherence, induced neutrophil activation. The selective synthesis of PAF and GM-CSF by activated ECs may play a role in regulating and amplifying the priming and activation of neutrophils on the EC-neutrophil interaction. ICAM-1–ß2 integrin–dependent signaling pathways in neutrophil activation had a minor effect on neutrophil O2- release on the coculture in our assay. Thus, we speculated that adhesion of neutrophils to activated ECs is unlikely to be the main mode of cytokine-activated EC potentiation of neutrophil.

Moreover, we found that the most enhanced effects of both exogenous PAF (20 nmol/L) and adhesion to cytokine-treated fixed ECs on O2- release by neutrophils were evoked by 50 pg/mL of nonglycosylated GM-CSF (Figures 5BUp and 8BUp). This concentration of GM-CSF was identical to that produced by activated ECs. On the basis of these findings, we speculate that, first, neutrophil recruitment via mediators and cytokines produced by activated ECs, such as PAF and IL-8, is an initial step; second, activated EC-associated PAF primes neutrophils adherent to ECs via the Mac-1–ICAM-1 pathway; and, third, potentially more GM-CSF synthesized by activated ECs augmented neutrophil activation during the transendothelial migration.

In conclusion, neutrophils primed by activated EC-associated PAF may be strongly potentiated by activated EC-synthesized GM-CSF during the transmigration in vivo. GM-CSF and PAF might be major contributors to neutrophil activation, whereas the Mac-1–ICAM-1 pathway might be a minor contributor. We have demonstrated for the first time, to our knowledge, that in collaboration with activated EC-derived PAF, GM-CSF synthesized by activated EC induced large amounts of O2- release from neutrophils and, furthermore, that cooperation of both GM-CSF and PAF at physiological concentrations was required for augmented neutrophil activation.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This study was supported by Grants-in-Aid from the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture, Japan. The authors thank Dr Daisuke Tachibana, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka City University Medical School, for technical assistance.


*    Footnotes
 
Original received July 17, 2000; resubmission received December 19, 2000; accepted January 2, 2001.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Pober JS, Cotran RS. Cytokines and endothelial cell biology. Physiol Rev. 1990;70:427–451.[Free Full Text]

2. Ross R. The pathogenesis of atherosclerosis: a perspective study for the 1990s. Nature. 1993;362:801–809.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

3. Osbom L. Leukocyte adhesion to endothelium in inflammation. Cell. 1990;62:3–6.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

4. Breviario F, Bertocchi F, Dejana E, Bussolino F. IL-1-induced adhesion of polymorphonuclear leukocytes to cultured human endothelial cells: role of platelet-activating factor. J Immunol. 1988;141:3391–3397.[Abstract]

5. Harlam JM. Leukocyte endothelial interactions. Blood. 1985;65:513–525.[Free Full Text]

6. Warner SJ, Auger KR, Libby P. Interleukin 1 induces interleukin 1. J Immunol. 1987;139:1911–1917.[Abstract]

7. Modur V, Zimmerman GA, Prescott SM, McIntyre TM. Endothelial cell inflammatory responses to tumor necrosis factor {alpha}: ceramide-dependent and -independent mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:13094–13102.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Huot J, Houle F, Marceau F, Landry J. Oxidative stress-induced actin reorganization mediated by the p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase/heat shock protein 27 pathway in vascular endothelial cells. Circ Res. 1997;80:383–392.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Suzuki K, Hino M, Hato F, Tatsumi N, Kitagawa S. Cytokine-specific activation of distinct mitogen-activated protein kinase subtype cascades in human neutrophils stimulated by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, and tumor necrosis factor-{alpha}. Blood. 1999;93:341–349.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Herrmann F, Oster W, Meuer SC, Lindemann A, Mertelsmann RH. Interleukin-1 stimulates T lymphocytes to produce granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor. J Clin Invest. 1988;81:1415–1418.

11. Stanford SJ, Pepper JR, Mitchell JA. Cyclooxygenase-2 regulates granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, but interleukin-8, production by human vascular cells: role of cAMP. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000;20:677–682.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Zsebo K, Yuschenkoff YS, Chang D, McCall E, Dinarello CA, Brown MA, Altrock B, Bagby GC Jr. Vascular endothelial cells and granulopoiesis: interleukin-1 stimulates release of G-CSF and GM-CSF. Blood. 1988;71:99–103.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Munker R, Gasson J, Ogawa M, Koeffler HP. Recombinant human TNF induces production of granulocyte-monocyte colony-stimulating factor. Nature. 1986;323:79–82.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

14. Yuo A, Kitagawa S, Ohsaka A, Saito M, Takaku F. Stimulation and priming of human neutrophils by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor: qualitative and quantitative differences. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1990;171:491–497.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

15. Cicco NA, Lindemann A, Content J, Vandenbussche P, Lubbert M, Gauss J, Mertelsmann R, Herrmann F. Inducible production of interleukin-6 by human polymorphonuclear neutrophils: role of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and tumor necrosis factor-{alpha}. Blood. 1990;75:2047–2052.

16. Nagata M, Sedgwick JB, Busse WW. Differential effects of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor on eosinophil and neutrophil superoxide anion generation. J Immunol. 1995;155:4948–4954.[Abstract]

17. Griffin JD, Spertini O, Ernst J, Belvin MP, Lavine HB, Kanakura Y, Tedder TF. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and other cytokines regulate surface expression of the leukocyte adhesion molecule-1 on human neutrophils, monocytes, and their precursors. J Immunol. 1990;145:576–584.[Abstract]

18. Zimmerman GA, McIntyre TM, Mehra M, Prescott S. Endothelial cell-associated platelet-activating factor: a novel mechanism for signaling intercellular adhesion. J Cell Biol. 1990;110:529–540.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Stewart AG, Dubbin PN, Harris T, Dusting GJ. Platelet-activating factor may act as a second messenger in the release of icosanoids and superoxide anions from leukocytes and endothelial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990;87:3215–3219.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Bussolino F, Camussi G, Baglioni C. Synthesis and release of platelet-activating factor by human vascular endothelial cells treated with tumor necrosis factor or interleukin 1a. J Biol Chem. 1988;263:11856–11861.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Prescott SM, Zimmerman GA, Mclntyre TM. Human endothelial cells in culture produce platelet-activating factor (1-alkyl-2-acetyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine) when stimulated with thrombin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984;81:3534–3538.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Takahashi M, Kitagawa S, Masuyama J, Ikeda U, Kasahara T, Takahashi Y, Furukawa Y, Kano S, Shimada K. Human monocyte-endothelial cell interaction induces synthesis of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor. Circulation. 1996;93:1185–1193.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Yuo A, Kitagawa S, Kasahara T, Matsushima K, Saito M, Takaku F. Stimulation and priming of human neutrophils by interleukin-8: cooperation with tumor necrosis factor and colony-stimulating factors. Blood. 1991;78:2708–2714.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Pober JS, Bevilacqua MP, Mendrick DL, Lapierre LA, Fiers W, Gimbrone MA Jr. Two distinct monokines, interleukin 1 and tumor necrosis factor, each independently induce biosynthesis and transient expression of the same antigen on the surface of cultured human vascular endothelial cells. J Immunol. 1986;136:1680–1687.[Abstract]

25. Petersen F, Bock L, Flad HD, Brandt E. Platelet factor 4-induced neutrophil-endothelial cell interaction: involvement of mechanisms and functional consequences different from those elicited by interleukin-8. Blood. 1999;94:4020–4028.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Nagata M, Sedgwick JB, Vrtis R, Busse WW. Endothelial cells upregulate eosinophil superoxide generation via VCAM-1 expression. Clin Exp Allergy. 1999;29:550–561.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

27. Hill ME, Bird IN, Daniel RH, Elmore MA, Finnen MJ. Endothelial cell-associated platelet-activating factor primes neutrophils for enhanced superoxide production and arachidonic acid release during adhesion to but not transmigration across IL-1ß-treated endothelial monolayers. J Immunol. 1994;153:3673–3683.[Abstract]

28. Kubes P, Payne D, Ostrovsky L. Preconditioning and adenosine in I/R-induced leukocyte-endothelial cell interactions. Am J Physiol. 1998;274:H1230–H1238.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

29. Crostein BN, Levin RI, Belanoff J, Weissmann G, Hirschhorn R. Adenosine: an endogenous inhibitor of neutrophil-mediated injury to endothelial cells. J Clin Invest. 1986;78:760–770.

30. Camussi G, Montrucchio G, Lupia E, Martino AD, Perona L, Arese M, Vercellone A, Toniolo A, Bussolino F. Platelet-activating factor directly stimulates in vitro migration of endothelial cells and promotes in vivo angiogenesis by a heparin-dependent mechanism. J Immunol. 1995;154:6492–6501.[Abstract]

31. Vercellotti GM, Yin HQ, Gustavson KS, Nelson RD, Jacob HS. Platelet-activating factor primes neutrophil responses to agonists: role in promoting neutrophil-mediated endothelial cell damage. Blood. 1988;71:1100–1107.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

32. Gay JC, Beckman JK, Zaboy KA, Lukens JN. Modulation of neutrophil oxidative responses to soluble stimuli by platelet-activating factor. Blood. 1986;67:931–936.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

33. Lewis MS, Whatley RE, Cain PC, McIntyre TM, Prescott SM, Zimmerman GA. Hydrogen peroxide stimulates synthesis of platelet-activating factor by endothelium and induces endothelial cell dependent neutrophil adhesion. J Clin Invest. 1988;82:2045–2055.

34. Kuijpers TW, Hakkert BC, Hart MHL, Roos D. Neutrophil migration across monolayers of cytokine-prestimulated endothelial cells: a role for platelet-activating factor and IL-8. J Cell Biol. 1992;117:565–572.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

35. Luscinskas FW, Cybulsky MI, Kiely JM, Peckins CS, Davis VM, Gimbrone MA Jr. Cytokine-activated human endothelial monolayers support enhanced neutrophil transmigration via a mechanism involving both endothelial leukocyte adhesion molecule-1 and intercellular adhesion molecule-1. J Immunol. 1991;146:1617–1625.[Abstract]

36. Lawrence MB, Springer TA. Neutrophils roll on E-selectin. J Immunol. 1993;11:6338–6346.

37. Dustin ML, Rothlein R, Bhan AK, Dinarello CA, Springer TA. Induction by IL 1 and interferon-{gamma} tissue distribution, biochemistry, and function of a natural adherence molecule (ICAM-1). J Immunol. 1986;137:245–254.[Abstract]

38. Smith CW, Marlin SD, Rothlein R, Toman C, Andersen DC. Cooperative interactions of LFA-1 and Mac-1 with intercellular adhesion molecule-1 in facilitating adherence and transendothelial migration of human neutrophils in vitro. J Clin Invest. 1989;83:2008–2017.

39. Lindermann A, Riedel D, Oster W, Meuer SC, Blohm D, Mertelsmann RH, Herrmann F. Granulocyte/macrophage colony stimulating factor induces interleukin 1 production by human polymorphonuclear neutrophils. J Immunol. 1988;140:837–839.[Abstract]

40. McColl SR, Beauseigle D, Gilbert C, Naccache PH. Priming of the human neutrophil respiratory burst by granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and tumor necrosis factor involves regulation at a post cell surface receptor level. J Immunol. 1990;145:3047–3053.[Abstract]

41. DeNichilo MO, Stewart AG, Vadas MV, Lopez AF. Granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor is a stimulant of platelet-activating factor and superoxide anion generation by human neutrophils. J Biol Chem. 1991;266:4896–4902.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

42. Westlin WF, Gimbrone MA Jr. Neutrophil-mediated damage to human vascular endothelium. Am J Pathol. 1993;142:117–128.[Abstract]

43. De la Harpe J, Nathan CF. Adenosine regulates the respiratory burst of cytokine-triggered human neutrophils adherent to biologic surface. J Immunol. 1989;143:596–602. [Abstract]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
A. Van Langendonckt, J. Donnez, S. Defrere, G. A.J. Dunselman, and P. G. Groothuis
Antiangiogenic and vascular-disrupting agents in endometriosis: pitfalls and promises
Mol. Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2008; 14(5): 259 - 268.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
R. Robert, M.-J. Jacobin-Valat, D. Daret, S. Miraux, A. T. Nurden, J.-M. Franconi, and G. Clofent-Sanchez
Identification of Human scFvs Targeting Atherosclerotic Lesions: SELECTION BY SINGLE ROUND IN VIVO PHAGE DISPLAY
J. Biol. Chem., December 29, 2006; 281(52): 40135 - 40143.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
E. Pluskota, O. I. Stenina, I. Krukovets, D. Szpak, E. J. Topol, and E. F. Plow
Mechanism and effect of thrombospondin-4 polymorphisms on neutrophil function
Blood, December 1, 2005; 106(12): 3970 - 3978.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
S.-J. Lin, S.-K. Shyue, Y.-Y. Hung, Y.-H. Chen, H.-H. Ku, J.-W. Chen, K.-B. Tam, and Y.-L. Chen
Superoxide Dismutase Inhibits the Expression of Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule-1 and Intracellular Cell Adhesion Molecule-1 Induced by Tumor Necrosis Factor-{alpha} in Human Endothelial Cells Through the JNK/p38 Pathways
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, February 1, 2005; 25(2): 334 - 340.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
C. Fiuza, M. Bustin, S. Talwar, M. Tropea, E. Gerstenberger, J. H. Shelhamer, and A. F. Suffredini
Inflammation-promoting activity of HMGB1 on human microvascular endothelial cells
Blood, April 1, 2003; 101(7): 2652 - 2660.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
C. D. O'Brien, P. Lim, J. Sun, and S. M. Albelda
PECAM-1-dependent neutrophil transmigration is independent of monolayer PECAM-1 signaling or localization
Blood, April 1, 2003; 101(7): 2816 - 2825.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
T. H. Wyman, A. J. Bjornsen, D. J. Elzi, C. W. Smith, K. M. England, M. Kelher, and C. C. Silliman
A two-insult in vitro model of PMN-mediated pulmonary endothelial damage: requirements for adherence and chemokine release
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, December 1, 2002; 283(6): C1592 - C1603.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Takahashi, T.
Right arrow Articles by Kitagawa, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Takahashi, T.
Right arrow Articles by Kitagawa, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Growth factors/cytokines
Right arrow Endothelium/vascular type/nitric oxide
Right arrow Mechanism of atherosclerosis/growth factors