Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation Research
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation Research. 2001;88:237-244

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dube, A.
Right arrow Articles by Oettgen, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dube, A.
Right arrow Articles by Oettgen, P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Angiogenesis
Right arrow Developmental biology
Right arrow Gene expression
Right arrow Gene regulation
(Circulation Research. 2001;88:237.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.


Molecular Medicine

ELF-1 Is a Transcriptional Regulator of the Tie2 Gene During Vascular Development

Antoinise Dube, Shelley Thai, John Gaspar, Susan Rudders, Towia A. Libermann, Luisa Iruela-Arispe, Peter Oettgen

From the Cardiology Division (A.D., J.G., S.R., P.O.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass; New England Baptist Bone and Joint Institute (A.D., J.G., S.R., T.A.L., P.O.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass; and Department of Molecular Cell and Developmental Biology (S.T., L.I.-A.), University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif.

Correspondence to Peter Oettgen, Harvard Institutes of Medicine, 4 Blackfan Circle, Boston, MA 02115. E-mail joettgen{at}caregroup.harvard.edu


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Abstract—Vascular development requires the tightly coordinated expression of several growth factors and their receptors. Among these are the Tie1 and Tie2 receptors, which are almost exclusively endothelial cell–specific. The critical transcriptional regulators of vascular-specific gene expression remain largely unknown. The Ets factors are a family of evolutionarily conserved transcription factors that regulate genes involved in cellular growth and differentiation. We have recently shown that the Ets factor NERF is a strong transactivator of the Tie1 and Tie2 genes. To extend these studies, we have begun to identify the Ets factors that are expressed in developing blood vessels of the chicken chorioallantoic membrane (CAM), a highly vascular embryonic network. RNA was extracted from microdissected CAM blood vessels, and reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction was performed using oligonucleotides encoding conserved amino acids within the Ets domain. One of the polymerase chain reaction fragments was subcloned and identified as the chicken homologue of the Ets factor ELF-1, cELF-1. ELF-1 is most closely related to the Ets factor NERF. In situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry demonstrate that cELF-1 is enriched in developing chicken blood vessels. cELF-1 is also a strong transactivator of the Tie1 and Tie2 genes and can bind to conserved Ets sites within the promoters of these genes. A complex of similar size forms when gel shifts are performed with cellular extracts derived from the CAM blood vessels, which is recognized by an antibody against cELF-1. In summary, ELF-1 belongs to a subset of Ets factors that regulate vascular-specific gene expression during blood vessel development.


Key Words: vascular development • angiogenesis • Tie2 gene • gene expression


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Vasculogenesis, the development of new blood vessels, begins during the second week of normal human embryogenesis. The Tie1 and Tie2 genes are one family of endothelial-specific receptor tyrosine kinases that have been determined to be critical for vascular development.1 They are expressed predominantly on endothelial cells of the developing vasculature. Targeted disruption of Tie1 leads to the development of leaky blood vessels, resulting in edema and hemorrhage, whereas disruption of Tie2 leads to the formation of dilated blood vessels with abnormalities in sprouting and branching of the developing blood vessels, resulting in defects in capillary network formation and early embryonic death.2 Mutations in the Tie2 gene have been identified in humans, resulting in venous malformations.3 Although these receptors were described as being completely endothelial cell–specific, it has recently been shown that both receptors are expressed in up to 30% of undifferentiated hematopoietic stem cells and 10% of B cells, suggesting a possible role in hematopoiesis in addition to vasculogenesis.4 5

The Ets genes are a family of at least 30 members that function as transcription factors.6 All Ets factors share a highly conserved 80- to 90-amino acid–long DNA-binding domain, the Ets domain. Ets factors play a central role in regulating genes involved in development, cellular differentiation, and proliferation. Many genes specific to macrophages, B cells, and T cells are regulated by Ets factors. The role of Ets factors in the immune system has been substantiated by experiments in mice, where the genes encoding several Ets factors have been disrupted by homologous recombination. The PU.1 knockout is characterized by a lack of immune-system development.7 The Ets-1 knockout mice are characterized by T-cell apoptosis and increased terminal B-cell differentiation.8

Interestingly, the main regulatory elements found thus far in the Flt-1, Tie1, and Tie2 genes contain several conserved putative Ets-binding sites that are critical for the transcriptional activity of the promoters and enhancers of these genes.9 10 11 For example, a mutation of one Ets-binding site in the promoter of the Flt-1 gene leads to a 90% reduction in the basal activity of the promoter. Likewise, in transgenic animals in which LacZ expression is directed throughout the vasculature by the Tie2 promoter and enhancer, a mutation in an Ets-binding site in the core enhancer leads to a marked reduction in vascular-directed LacZ gene expression. We have recently identified conserved Ets-binding sites in the Tie1 and Tie2 promoters, which are necessary for vascular-specific gene expression.12 13 It is presently not known which of the Ets factors are critical for the transcriptional activity of these genes.

To determine which of the Ets transcription factors are expressed during blood vessel formation and may regulate vascular-specific genes during this process, we examined developing blood vessels in the chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) of the chicken and identified the chicken homologue of ELF-1 (cELF-1). Our results demonstrate that cELF-1 is a strong transactivator of the Tie1 and Tie2 genes, can bind to specific Ets sites within the Tie1 and Tie2 promoters, and is enriched in developing blood vessels, suggesting that it contributes to the transcriptional regulation of vascular development.


*    Materials and Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Materials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Cell Culture
Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs), human dermal microvascular endothelial cells, and human aortic endothelial cells (HAECs) were obtained from Clonetics. PY41 endothelial cells were a generous gift from Vicki Bautch (University of North Carolina).14 The murine yolk-sac endothelial cell line (C166) and the EOMA cells were a generous gift from Robert Auerbach (University of Wisconsin) and were grown as previously described.15 16

RNA Extraction and Northern Blot Analysis
Total RNA was extracted from CAM blood vessels, cultured CAM endothelial cells, and blood derived from the CAM at different developmental stages, as previously described.17 Total RNA was electrophoresed and transferred onto a Nytran membrane. The filters were blocked in prehybridization solution and then hybridized with a cELF-1–specific probe. The cELF-1 cDNA fragment used to generate the probe is 700 bp in length and encodes the first 100 amino acids of the cELF-1 protein and 100 bp of the 5' untranslated region. The size of the band detected by Northern blot analysis is 3.4 kb. To normalize for loading and transfer efficiency, the membranes were rehybridized with a probe for the 36B4 chicken housekeeping gene. The size of the band detected by Northern blot analysis is 1 kb.

Reverse Transcriptase–Polymerase Chain Reaction and Chicken {lambda}-Phage Library Screen
To identify Ets factors that are expressed in the developing blood vessels of the chicken CAM, reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was performed using RNA extracted from the CAM blood vessels. cDNA was generated from 2 µg of total RNA by using random hexamer priming. Degenerate oligonucleotides corresponding to conserved regions within the Ets-DNA–binding domain were use as previously described.18 PCR fragments were subcloned, and fragments of the expected sized were sequenced. A 5-day chicken yolk-sac library (Stratagene) was plated and screened with a partial cDNA fragment for cELF-1. Two full-length cDNA clones were isolated. For RT-PCR of the human and mouse endothelial cells, the ELF-1–specific primers used, which recognize both mouse and human ELF-1, were 5'-ATGGCTGCTGTTGTCCAAC-3' and 5'-CCTGAGTGCTCT(C/T)CCCAT-3', with an expected amplification product of 700 bp. The GAPDH primers used were 5'-CAAAGTTGTCATGGATGACC-3' and 5'-CCATGGAGAAGGCT- GGGG-3', with an expected amplification product of 200 bp. PCRs were performed as previously described.19

In Situ Hybridization
Whole-mount in situ hybridization on embryonic day 3 (E3) chick embryos and E10 CAMs was carried out as described by Wilkinson et al.20 The sense and antisense probes were derived from the same 700-bp fragment that was used for Northern blot analysis, which was subcloned into the PCRII vector (Invitrogen) containing both a T7 (sense) and an Sp6 (antisense) promoter. Briefly, embryos were fixed, dehydrated, and rehydrated through a methanol series and washed in 1x PBT (PBS plus 0.1% Tween-20). Embryos were then permeabilized at room temperature. After color developed to the appropriate intensity, specimens were washed several times and then rehydrated through the graded methanol baths. Images of the embryos suspended in 80% glycerol were obtained using a 3CCD Toshiba camera on a Nikon SMZ-U dissecting microscope. Digoxigenin-labeled RNA probes were prepared per the manufacturer’s recommendations (Roche). The level of digoxigenin incorporation was assessed by using a dot-blot comparison to a standard (Roche).

Immunohistochemistry
Paraffin-embedded E4 and E5.5 chicken embryos were stained with a rabbit polyclonal anti–cELF-1 antibody. Sections were clarified with xylene and rehydrated through a decreasing gradient of ethanol. After several washes with ddH2O and 1x PBS, sections were treated with 0.1 mg/mL proteinase K in 1x PBS. Hybridization with an anti–cELF-1 probe was performed overnight after blocking for 1 hour with 2% goat serum in 1x PBT (PBS containing 0.05% Tween-20). Sections were then incubated with biotinylated anti-rabbit (Vector Laboratory) and fluorescein avidin DN (Vector Laboratory), consecutively. Immunostained sections were then analyzed by confocal microscopy. Nuclear staining was made possible with the addition of 0.1 mg/mL propidium iodide dissolved in 1:1 PBS/glycerol mounting medium.

DNA Transfection Assays
Cotransfections of 1.5 to 2x105 endothelial cells or 293 HEK cells were performed using 1.75 µg of the reporter-gene construct DNA and 0.75 µg of the expression-vector DNA with Lipofectamine (Gibco BRL). The cells were harvested 16 hours after transfection and assayed for luciferase. Individual transfections were performed in duplicate and repeated independently in triplicate with similar results. Cotransfection of a second plasmid for determination of transfection efficiency was omitted, because potential artifacts with this technique have been reported21 and because many commonly used viral promoters contain potential binding sites for Ets factors.

In Vitro Transcription-Translation
Full-length chicken and human ELF-1 cDNA encoding the entire open-reading frames were inserted downstream of the T7 promoter into the Bluescript vector. Coupled in vitro transcription–in vitro translation reactions were performed with 1 µg of plasmid DNA using the TNT reticulocyte lysate kit (Promega) and T7 RNA polymerase as recommended by the manufacturer. The plasmid vector without an insert was used as a control.

Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay
DNA-binding reactions were performed as previously described.18 22 Briefly, 20-µL samples containing 2 µL of in vitro–translated products or cell extracts were incubated with a solution containing 32P-labeled double-stranded probes (30 000 cpm). Samples were incubated in the presence or absence of increasing amounts of cold competitor (5 or 50 ng) for 15 to 20 minutes at room temperature and run on a 4% polyacrylamide gel (acrylamide-bisacrylamide, 29:1) containing a buffer of 0.25x TBE (22.5 mmol/L Tris borate and 0.5 mmol/L EDTA). Oligonucleotides used as probes and for competition studies were as follows:

Tie2 promoter oligonucleotide

5'-TGCAAAGGAAACAGGAAAAAGGAACTTAAC-3'

3'-ACGTTTCCTTTGTCCTTTTTCCTTGAATTG-5'

Tie1 P1

5'-ACTGGCTTCCTCCCTTTCCTGTCTC-3'

3'-TGACCGAAGGAGGGAAAGGACAGAG-5'

Tie1 P2

5'-CCATCATTTCCTCTTCCTCCCCAG-3'

3'-GGTAGTAAAGGAGAAGGAGGGGTC-5'

Tie1 P2 Mut1

5'-CCATCATTTAATCTTCCTCCCCAG-3'

3'-GGTAGTAAATTAGAAGGAGGGGTC-5'

Tie1 P2 Mut2

5'-CCATCATTTCCTCTTAATCCCCAG-3'

3'-GGTAGTAAAGGAGAATTAGGGGTC-5'

Tie1 P2 Mut1,2

5'-CCATCATTTAATCTTAATCCCCAG-3'

3'-GGTAGTAAATTAGAATTAGGGGTC-5'


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Isolation of the cELF-1
In an effort to identify transcription factors belonging to the Ets family that are expressed during blood vessel development, we chose to examine the highly vascular chicken CAM. Vessels within the CAM undergo an exponential growth followed by a quiescent phase. Total RNA was extracted from blood vessels that were microdissected from 10-day-old CAMs. RT-PCR was performed with degenerate PCR primers corresponding to conserved regions of the Ets domain, allowing the identification of a partial DNA sequence for a member of the Ets-factor family. This fragment was used to screen a chicken yolk-sac cDNA library and isolate a cDNA clone encoding the full-length cELF-1. As shown in Figure 1Down, cELF-1 encodes a 617-amino acid–long protein with an expected molecular mass of 71.0 kDa. The highest degree of homology to ELF-1 exists in the DNA-binding domain (100%), with overall protein sequence homology of 77%. We have previously identified additional regions of homology between ELF-1 and a closely related Ets factor, NERF, in the transactivation domain. These 4 domains (A through D) are also highly conserved between human, murine, and chicken ELF-1.23 To demonstrate that translation of the cELF-1 generates a protein of the expected size, we performed in vitro transcription translation with 35S-methionine. As shown in Figure 2Down, translation of the cELF-1 and human ELF-1 cDNA fragments generated fragments of the expected size.



View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Complete protein sequence for cELF-1 compared with mouse (m) and human (h) counterparts. Dash (-) represents identity to amino acid, and underline (_) signifies amino acid not present in this position.



View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. S35-methionine in vitro–translated cELF-1 protein compared with human ELF-1. Molecular mass standard sizes in kilodaltons are shown on the left.

Expression Pattern of cELF-1 in the Chicken CAM
To determine the expression pattern of cELF-1 in the CAM, Northern blot analysis was performed using RNA derived from CAM blood vessels at different developmental stages. As shown in Figure 3ADown, cELF-1 is highly expressed in the CAM blood vessels. Because it has previously been shown that ELF-1 is expressed in T and B cells, we examined the expression of cELF-1 in fetal chicken blood at different stages of development. As expected, cELF-1 is also highly expressed in chicken blood (Figure 3BDown). To ascertain whether cELF-1 is expressed in the CAM blood vessels devoid of blood, RNA was extracted from CAM blood vessels flushed free of blood and from unflushed CAMs. Although flushing the blood vessels diminishes the expression of cELF-1, there is still significant expression of cELF-1 in the flushed vessels (Figure 3CDown). Furthermore, cELF-1 expression is demonstrated in fetal chicken endothelial cells, compared with chicken fibroblasts, which demonstrate minimal expression of cELF-1.



View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. A, Northern blot analysis of cELF-1 expression in microdissected blood vessels from the chicken CAM at different developmental stages (days 5 through 19). Control is 36B4, a chicken housekeeping gene. B, Northern blot analysis of chicken fetal blood at different developmental stages. C, Expression of cELF-1 in CAM-derived blood vessels washed free of blood (-) compared with blood (+) and cELF-1 expression in chicken yolk-sac endothelial cells and embryonic fibroblasts. D, RT-PCR expression of murine and human ELF-1 in human and murine endothelial cells: PY41 and EOMA (endothelioma cell lines); C166, a murine yolk-sac endothelial cell line; human dermal microvascular endothelial cells (HDECs); HUVECs; HAECs; and 2 B-cell lines, HAFTL and A20.

ELF-1 Is Expressed in a Subset of Human and Murine Endothelial Cells
We were somewhat surprised to find cELF-1 highly expressed in the CAM blood vessels, because we had previously examined ELF-1 expression in human endothelial cells and not detected it in either HUVECs or HAECs.13 To extend these studies, we examined additional murine and human endothelial cells for the expression of ELF-1. As shown in Figure 3DUp, ELF-1 is also expressed in the murine yolk-sac endothelial line C166, EOMA and PY41 endothelioma lines, and human dermal microvascular endothelial cells. This suggests that ELF-1 is only expressed in a subset of endothelial cells. As a positive control, we used the B-cell lines A20 and HAFTL, which we have previously shown express ELF-1.23

Expression Pattern of cELF-1 in the Embryo
We have previously demonstrated that human ELF-1 is highly expressed in several fetal tissues, including the heart and liver, and, weakly, in the brain.23 To ascertain cELF-1 expression at different developmental stages, Northern blot analysis was performed with chicken fetal organs at different developmental stages. As shown in Figure 4Down, cELF-1 is strongly expressed in the fetal liver, in several later developmental stages in the heart, and in a temporal window in embryonic brain and limb development.



View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Northern blot analysis of cELF-1 in chicken fetal brain and heart (A) and chicken fetal limb and liver (B). Control is 36B4, a chicken housekeeping gene.

In Situ Hybridization of cELF-1 in the Developing Blood Vessels of the Chicken CAM
Having demonstrated strong expression of cELF-1 in the CAM blood vessels at different stages by Northern blot analysis, the expression of cELF-1 was examined by in situ hybridization to additionally define the expression pattern of cELF-1 during blood vessel development. As shown in Figure 5ADown (top), cELF-1 is expressed along the lining of the larger caliber blood vessels, with a punctate expression pattern in the smaller branching vessels. At higher magnification, strong expression of cELF-1 is demonstrated in these smaller-caliber branching vessels (Figure 6ADown, HP). Whole-mount in situ hybridization also confirmed strong expression in the developing heart at day 10 (Figure 5BDown).



View larger version (92K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Whole-mount in situ hybridization of cELF-1 in E10 chicken embryos. cELF-1 transcripts were detected along the lining of the larger-caliber blood vessels. A, Note the punctate expression of cELF-1 at a low power (LP) of magnification (x10) in the yolk-sac microvessels. This expression in the microvessels is seen better at higher-power (HP) magnification (x40). B, cELF-1 is expressed in the chicken fetal heart as early as day 3 (red arrowhead).



View larger version (69K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Immunohistochemistry analysis of E4 and E5 chicken embryos for expression of cELF-1. Paraffin-embedded sections were incubated with anti–cELF-1, and immunocomplexes were detected with biotinylated anti-rabbit antibody followed by fluorescein avidin DN. Visualization of nuclei was performed with propidium iodide. A, cELF-1 expression is detected in the endothelium of the dorsal aorta (DA) of E4 chickens. B, Higher magnification of panel A viewed with x40 objective. Arrows point to endothelial lining of dorsal aorta. Arrowhead indicates expression of cELF-1 by blood cells. C and D, Negative control staining with similar concentrations of preimmune serum. E, Note inner endothelium lining of E5.5 chicken blood vessel (arrow). F, Arrowheads point to the intersomitic vessels of E4 chicken. G, Presence of cELF-1 in E4 heart (H) but not surrounding lung (L). H, Higher magnification (x20) of chicken embryo heart. Arrow indicates pericardium; arrowhead, endocardium.

Immunohistochemistry of cELF-1 in the Developing Chicken Embryo
To examine cELF-1 protein expression during chicken embryogenesis, with a particular focus on blood vessel development, immunohistochemistry was performed using an ELF-1 polyclonal antibody. Paraffin-embedded sections of E4 and E5.5 chicken embryos were incubated with anti–cELF-1, and immunocomplexes were detected with biotinylated anti-rabbit antibody followed by fluorescein avidin DN. Visualization of nuclei was performed with propidium iodide. As shown in Figure 6AUp, cELF-1 is highly expressed in the inner lining of the developing dorsal aorta (DA) of E4 chicken embryos. At higher magnification (Figure 6BUp), cELF-1 expression is also appreciated in a subset of blood cells within the lumen of the aorta, as would be expected, because ELF-1 has previously been shown to be expressed in a subset of hematopoietic cells. No expression could be detected with preimmune serum (Figures 6CUp and 6DUp). cELF-1 was also detected in smaller developing chicken blood vessels (Figure 6EUp) and in intersomitic vessels of the 4-day chicken embryo (Figure 6FUp). Because we detected high levels of cELF-1 expression in the developing chicken heart by whole-mount in situ hybridization, we also examined cELF-1 protein expression in the developing heart. At lower magnification (Figure 6GUp), expression is appreciated in the heart but not the surrounding lung. At higher magnification, cELF-1 expression is detected in the endocardium of the heart (Figure 6HUp). Interestingly, expression was also detected on the pericardial surface.

cELF-1 Can Transactivate the Tie1 and Tie2 Promoters
We have previously shown that one of the NERF gene isoforms, NERF2, is a strong transactivator of the Tie2 gene.13 Because ELF-1 is highly homologous to NERF2, we tested the ability of the chicken and human forms of ELF-1 to transactivate the Tie2 gene promoter. As shown in Figure 7ADown, cELF-1 was similar to human ELF-1 in its ability to transactivate the Tie2 promoter, in contrast to Ets-1 and Ets-2, which only weakly transactivate the Tie2 promoter. Because we have previously demonstrated that the Ets factor NERF is similarly able to transactivate the Tie1 gene, we were interested in testing whether the human or chicken ELF-1 could similarly transactivate the Tie1 promoter.12 As shown in Figure 7BDown, both chicken and human ELF-1 are strong transactivators of the Tie1 promoter. This suggests that both the Tie1 and Tie2 genes may be gene targets for ELF-1.



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Transient cotransfection of Tie2-promoter luciferase-reporter construct with PCI expression plasmids (Promega) for several different Ets factors, including cELF-1, ELF-1, Ets-1, and Ets-2 (A) and for the Tie1-promoter luciferase-reporter construct (B).

cELF-1 Can Bind to Ets Sites in the Tie1 and Tie2 Promoter
We have previously identified the Ets-binding sites that are necessary for transactivation by Ets factors with the Tie2 promoter.13 The ability of in vitro–translated human ELF-1 and cELF-1 to bind to the same Tie2 Ets sites was also examined. As shown in Figure 8ADown, both human and chicken ELF-1 form similar DNA-protein complexes with the Tie2 Ets sites (lanes 2 and 3). We then tested the ability of an ELF-1–specific antibody to interfere with the formation of these complexes. This antibody was able to interfere with complex formation of both human and chicken ELF-1. Furthermore, the appearance of an additional higher-mobility complex when the antibody was used in the presence of cELF-1 suggests the formation of a supershift (see arrow, lane 6). Because several Ets factors may potentially bind to the Tie2 Ets site in vivo, in the developing chicken, we performed gel-shift assays with the Tie2 Ets probe and cell extracts from the chicken CAM. As shown in Figure 8BDown, lane 3, a similar-sized complex is formed compared with the in vitro–translated cELF-1. When the ELF-1 antibody was added, it similarly resulted in the formation of a supershifted complex, suggesting that cELF-1 derived from the chicken CAM is the Ets factor that specifically binds to the Tie2 Ets site.



View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 8. A, Electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) of in vitro translated cELF-1 compared with human ELF-1, with an oligonucleotide probe encoding the Tie2 Ets sites (lanes 1 through 3). The control is an in vitro translation with the empty expression plasmid. This is followed by addition of an ELF-1–specific antibody (lanes 4 through 6). Black arrow denotes supershift. B, EMSA using the Tie2 Ets probe and chicken CAM cell extracts at day 10 alone or with the anti–ELF-1 antibody (lanes 3 and 4) compared with in vitro–translated control and cELF-1 (lanes 1 and 2). C, EMSA comparing ability of in vitro–translated cELF-1 (cE) to bind to conserved Ets-binding sites in the Tie1 promoter Tie1 P1 and Tie1 P2 compared with the Tie2 probe. Control extracts (C) are used as a negative control. D, Competition experiments for binding of cELF-1 to the Tie1 P2 Ets-binding sites with 5 or 50 ng of oligonucleotides, in which both (Mut1,2), one (Mut1 or Mut2), or none (wild-type Tie1 P2) of the Ets sites have been mutated. (See Materials and Methods for sequence of the oligonucleotides).

We also examined the ability of cELF-1 to bind to conserved Ets sites in the Tie1 promoter.9 There are 2 Ets-site doublets, P1 and P2, that are highly conserved in this promoter. We tested the ability of cELF-1 to bind to these Ets sites. As shown in Figure 8CUp, cELF-1 binds well to both of these Ets sites. To additionally demonstrate the specificity of binding to particular Ets sites, we tested the ability of various cold mutant oligonucleotides to interfere with binding of cELF-1 to the Tie1 P2 Ets sites (Figure 8DUp). When both of the Ets sites were mutated (Mut 1, 2), the oligonucleotides were unable to compete for binding. When the first Ets site was mutated, Mut 1, it competed only weakly with binding of cELF-1 to the Tie1 P2 probe. However, when only the second Ets site was mutated, it competed equally as well as the wild-type oligonucleotide, suggesting that the first Ets site within this doublet is a higher-affinity binding site for cELF-1.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
The goal of this study was to identify transcription factors that regulate blood vessel development. In particular, we have identified a member of the Ets transcription-factor family, ELF-1, that is enriched in the developing blood vessels of the chicken embryo. ELF-1 was originally described as a regulator of T-cell–specific genes, including the interleukin-2 gene, interleukin-2 receptor, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, and CD4 genes.24 25 26 In addition, we and others have recently shown that ELF-1 is also expressed in B cells, where it regulates IgH gene expression.27 We have also recently isolated a novel member of the Ets gene family, NERF, which shares the highest degree of homology to ELF-1, and have shown that NERF and ELF-1 are also involved in the regulation of the B-cell–specific tyrosine kinase blk.23 This is the first report to demonstrate a role for ELF-1 in vascular-specific gene expression during blood vessel development in addition to its role in regulating genes of hematopoietic origin.

We have shown that ELF-1 can transactivate the Tie1 and Tie2 genes; therefore, these genes may serve as targets for ELF-1. The regulatory elements of both the Tie1 and Tie2 genes have been used to direct LacZ gene expression in a vascular-specific manner. Mutations in selected Ets sites in the regulatory regions of the Tie1 and Tie2 genes result in marked reductions in vascular-specific gene expression in vivo. Furthermore, with certain mutations, in addition to a reduction in overall vascular-specific gene expression, the LacZ-directed gene expression is reduced more in certain vascular beds than in others.12 This would suggest that certain Ets factors may be more important for the regulation of vascular-specific gene expression in certain vascular beds. With regard to expression of human and chicken ELF-1, for example, both are expressed only briefly in the fetal brain and not at all in adult brain, whereas both are strongly expressed in the fetal and adult heart, supporting a role for ELF-1 for differential gene expression in different tissues. A recent study performed on the transcriptional regulation of the human endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) gene provides additional support that ELF-1 is involved in vascular-specific gene expression. In this study, ELF-1 was shown to cooperate with the transcription factors Sp1, Sp3, and MAZ to form a multiprotein complex required for transcriptional activation of the eNOS gene.28

With regard to other Ets factors, Ets-1 has previously been shown to be expressed in developing blood vessels and tumor angiogenesis, but it does not seem to be able to transactivate the core regulatory elements of the Tie2 gene.29 30 Ets-1 may be important for normal endothelial function, because antisense oligonucleotides directed against Ets-1 were able to inhibit endothelial cell migration. Furthermore, these oligonucleotides were also able to inhibit vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)–induced cell proliferation.31 Ets-1 has also been shown to be inducible in endothelial cells by a variety of angiogenic substances, including basic fibroblast growth factor, VEGF, and epidermal growth factor. This upregulation was accompanied by increases in the expression of urokinase plasminogen activator and matrix metalloproteinase-1, which could be blocked with Ets-1 antisense oligonucleotides.32 However, targeted disruption of the gene was not associated with any vascular defects. One of the Ets factors, Tel, was recently shown to be involved in the development of the extraembryonic blood vessels. Targeted disruption of the gene leads to abnormalities in vitelline vein development. There seems to be normal capillary blood vessel development, but not of the larger blood vessels. The vascular defects seem to be mainly extraembryonic, with the predominant embryonic defects including apoptosis of mesenchymal and neural cells.33

Perhaps one of the most interesting recent findings regarding the transcriptional regulation of vascular development has been the determination that the zinc finger transcription factor stem-cell leukemia (SCL), which was originally shown to play a role strictly in hematopoiesis, also seems to be critical for embryonic blood vessel development. Targeted disruption of this gene led to embryonic lethality by day 9.5 because of an absence of yolk-sac erythropoiesis. However, it was unclear whether this gene might also contribute to nonhematopoietic pathways. By performing transgenic experiments in which the GATA-1 promoter was used to restore SCL gene expression in hematopoietic lineages in SCL-/- mice, there were striking abnormalities in yolk-sac angiogenesis.34 This suggests that certain transcription factors may be critical for both the normal development of hematopoietic cells and blood vessels and that there may be a common stem-cell precursor for both lineages. The most striking defects were a disorganized array of capillaries and absence of normal vitelline blood vessel formation. Although the larger vitelline blood vessels were not present, a smaller network of interconnecting vessels did exist. The architecture of these vessels revealed normal-appearing endothelial cells as well as the smooth muscle cells or pericytes that constituted the outer lining of the blood vessels.

In conclusion, the results of these studies provide substantial support for the role of the Ets factors in vascular development and vascular-specific gene expression in addition to their known role in hematopoiesis. The present study provides strong evidence for a dual role for ELF-1 in hematopoiesis and vascular development and, in particular, in regulating the gene expression of the Tie2 gene.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This study was supported by National Institutes of Health grants RO1/HL63008 and KO8/CA71429 to P.O. and an American Heart Association Grant in Aid to L.I.


*    Footnotes
 
Original received July 27, 2000; revision received November 2, 2000; accepted November 14, 2000.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Sato TN, Qin Y, Kozak CA, Audus KL. Tie-1 and tie-2 define another class of putative receptor tyrosine kinase genes expressed in early embryonic vascular system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90:9355–9358.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Sato TN, Tozawa Y, Deutsch U, Wolburg-Buchholz K, Fujiwara Y, Gendron-Maguire M, Gridley T, Wolburg H, Risau W, Qin Y. Distinct roles of the receptor tyrosine kinases Tie-1 and Tie-2 in blood vessel formation. Nature. 1995;376:70–74.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Vikkula M, Boon LM, Carraway KL, Calvert JT, Diamonti AJ, Goumnerov B, Pasyk KA, Marchuk DA, Warman ML, Cantley LC, Mulliken JB, Olsen BR. Vascular dysmorphogenesis caused by an activating mutation in the receptor tyrosine kinase TIE2. Cell. 1996;87:1181–1190.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Hashiyama M, Iwama A, Ohshiro K, Kurozumi K, Yasunaga K, Shimizu Y, Masuho Y, Matsuda I, Yamaguchi N, Suda T. Predominant expression of a receptor tyrosine kinase, TIE, in hematopoietic stem cells and B cells. Blood. 1996;87:93–101.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Yano M, Iwama A, Nishio H, Suda J, Takada G, Suda T. Expression and function of murine receptor tyrosine kinases, TIE and TEK, in hematopoietic stem cells. Blood. 1997;89:4317–4326.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Wasylyk B, HSL, Giovane A. The Ets family of transcription factors. Eur J Biochem. 1993;211:7–18.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Scott EW, Simon MC, Anastasi J, Singh H. Requirement of transcription factor PU.1 in the development of multiple hematopoietic lineages. Science. 1994;265:1573–1577.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Muthusamy N, Barton K, Leiden JM. Defective activation and survival of T cells lacking the Ets-1 transcription factor. Nature. 1995;377:639–642.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Korhonen J, Lahtinen I, Halmekyto M, Alhonen L, Janne J, Dumont D, Alitalo K. Endothelial-specific gene expression directed by the tie gene promoter in vivo. Blood. 1995;86:1828–1835.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Schlaeger TM, Bartunkova S, Lawitts JA, Teichmann G, Risau W, Deutsch U, Sato TN. Uniform vascular-endothelial-cell-specific gene expression in both embryonic and adult transgenic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94:3058–3063.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Wakiya K, Begue A, Stehelin D, Shibuya M. A cAMP response element and an Ets motif are involved in the transcriptional regulation of flt-1 tyrosine kinase (vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1) gene. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:30823–30828.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Iljin K, Dube A, Kontusaari S, Korhonen J, Lahtinen I, Oettgen P, Alitalo K. Role of Ets factors in the activity and endothelial cell specificity of the mouse Tie gene promoter. FASEB J. 1999;13:377–386.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Dube A, Akbarali Y, Sato TN, Libermann TA, Oettgen P. Role of the Ets transcription factors in the regulation of the vascular-specific Tie2 gene. Circ Res. 1999;84:1177–1185.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Dubois-Stringfellow N, Kolpack-Martindale L, Bautch VL, Azizkhan RG. Mice with hemangiomas induced by transgenic endothelial cells: a model for the Kasabach-Merritt syndrome. Am J Pathol. 1994;144:796–806.[Abstract]
  15. Lu LS, Wang SJ, Auerbach R. In vitro and in vivo differentiation into B cells, T cells, and myeloid cells of primitive yolk sac hematopoietic precursor cells expanded >100-fold by coculture with a clonal yolk sac endothelial cell line. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93:14782–14787.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Obeso J, Weber J, Auerbach R. A hemangioendothelioma-derived cell line: its use as a model for the study of endothelial cell biology. Lab Invest. 1990;63:259–269.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Chomczynski P, Sacchi N. Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Anal Biochem. 1987;162:156–159.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Lopez M, Oettgen P, Akbarali Y, Dendorfer U, Libermann TA. ERP, a new member of the Ets transcription factor/oncoprotein family: cloning, characterization, and differential expression during B-lymphocyte development. Mol Cell Biol. 1994;14:3292–3309.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Oettgen P, Carter KC, Augustus M, Barcinski M, Boltax J, Kunsch C, Libermann TA. The novel epithelial-specific Ets transcription factor gene ESX maps to human chromosome 1q32.1. Genomics. 1997;445:456–457.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Wilkinson DG, Bailes JA, Champion JE, McMahon AP. A molecular analysis of mouse development from 8 to 10 days post coitum detects changes only in embryonic globin expression. Development. 1987;99:493–500.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Farr A, Roman A. A pitfall of using a second plasmid to determine transfection efficiency. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992;20:920.[Free Full Text]
  22. Libermann TA, Lenardo M, Baltimore D. Involvement of a second lymphoid-specific enhancer element in the regulation of immunoglobulin heavy-chain gene expression. Mol Cell Biol. 1990;10:3155–3162.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Oettgen P, Akbarali Y, Boltax J, Best J, Kunsch C, Libermann TA. Characterization of NERF, a novel transcription factor related to the Ets factor ELF-1. Mol Cell Biol. 1996;16:5091–5106.[Abstract]
  24. Serdobova I, Pla M, Reichenbach P, Sperisen P, Ghysdael J, Wilson A, Freeman J, Nabholz M. Elf-1 contributes to the function of the complex interleukin (IL)-2–responsive enhancer in the mouse IL-2 receptor {alpha} gene. J Exp Med. 1997;185:1211–1221.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Thompson CB, Wang CY, Ho IC, Bohjanen PR, Petryniak B, June CH, Miesfeldt S, Zhang L, Nabel GJ, Karpinski B. cis-Acting sequences required for inducible interleukin-2 enhancer function bind a novel Ets-related protein, Elf-1. Mol Cell Biol. 1992;12:1043–1053.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Wang CY, Bassuk AG, Boise LH, Thompson CB, Bravo R, Leiden JM. Activation of the granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor promoter in T cells requires cooperative binding of Elf-1 and AP-1 transcription factors. Mol Cell Biol. 1994;14:1153–1159.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Akbarali Y, Oettgen P, Boltax J, Libermann TA. ELF-1 interacts with and transactivates the IgH enhancer pi site. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:26007–26012.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Karantzoulis-Fegaras F, Antoniou H, Lai SL, Kulkarni G, D’Abreo C, Wong GK, Miller TL, Chan Y, Atkins J, Wang Y, Marsden PA. Characterization of the human endothelial nitric-oxide synthase promoter. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:3076–3093.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Kola I, Brookes S, Green AR, Garber R, Tymms M, Papas TS, Seth A. The Ets1 transcription factor is widely expressed during murine embryo development and is associated with mesodermal cells involved in morphogenetic processes such as organ formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90:7588–7592.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Wernert N, Raes MB, Lassalle P, Dehouck MP, Gosselin B, Vandenbunder B, Stehelin D. c-ets1 proto-oncogene is a transcription factor expressed in endothelial cells during tumor vascularization and other forms of angiogenesis in humans. Am J Pathol. 1992;140:119–127.[Abstract]
  31. Chen Z, Fisher RJ, Riggs CW, Rhim JS, Lautenberger JA. Inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor-induced endothelial cell migration by ETS1 antisense oligonucleotides. Cancer Res. 1997;57:2013–2019.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Iwasaka C, Tanaka K, Abe M, Sato Y. Ets-1 regulates angiogenesis by inducing the expression of urokinase-type plasminogen activator and matrix metalloproteinase-1 and the migration of vascular endothelial cells. J Cell Physiol. 1996;169:522–531.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Wang LC, Kuo F, Fujiwara Y, Gilliland DG, Golub TR, Orkin SH. Yolk sac angiogenic defect and intra-embryonic apoptosis in mice lacking the Ets-related factor TEL. EMBO J. 1997;16:4374–4383.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Visvader JE, Fujiwara Y, Orkin SH. Unsuspected role for the T-cell leukemia protein SCL/tal-1 in vascular development. Genes Dev. 1998;12:473–479.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BloodHome page
Y. Okada, E. Jin, V. Nikolova-Krstevski, K. Yano, J. Liu, D. Beeler, K. Spokes, M. Kitayama, N. Funahashi, T. Doi, et al.
A GABP-binding element in the Robo4 promoter is necessary for endothelial expression in vivo
Blood, September 15, 2008; 112(6): 2336 - 2339.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
A.-M. Teichert, J. A. Scott, G. B. Robb, Y.-Q. Zhou, S.-N. Zhu, M. Lem, A. Keightley, B. M. Steer, A. C. Schuh, S. L. Adamson, et al.
Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase Gene Expression During Murine Embryogenesis: Commencement of Expression in the Embryo Occurs With the Establishment of a Unidirectional Circulatory System
Circ. Res., July 3, 2008; 103(1): 24 - 33.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
Y. Okada, K. Yano, E. Jin, N. Funahashi, M. Kitayama, T. Doi, K. Spokes, D. L. Beeler, S.-C. Shih, H. Okada, et al.
A Three-Kilobase Fragment of the Human Robo4 Promoter Directs Cell Type-Specific Expression in Endothelium
Circ. Res., June 22, 2007; 100(12): 1712 - 1722.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
P. Oettgen
Regulation of Vascular Inflammation and Remodeling by ETS Factors
Circ. Res., November 24, 2006; 99(11): 1159 - 1166.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
A. Hamik, B. Wang, and M. K. Jain
Transcriptional Regulators of Angiogenesis
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., September 1, 2006; 26(9): 1936 - 1947.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
J. E. Pimanda, W.Y. I. Chan, I. J. Donaldson, M. Bowen, A. R. Green, and B. Gottgens
Endoglin expression in the endothelium is regulated by Fli-1, Erg, and Elf-1 acting on the promoter and a -8-kb enhancer
Blood, June 15, 2006; 107(12): 4737 - 4745.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
X. Huang, C. Brown, W. Ni, E. Maynard, A. C. Rigby, and P. Oettgen
Critical role for the Ets transcription factor ELF-1 in the development of tumor angiogenesis
Blood, April 15, 2006; 107(8): 3153 - 3160.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
J.-R. Landry, S. Kinston, K. Knezevic, I. J. Donaldson, A. R. Green, and B. Gottgens
Fli1, Elf1, and Ets1 regulate the proximal promoter of the LMO2 gene in endothelial cells
Blood, October 15, 2005; 106(8): 2680 - 2687.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
A. Hegen, S. Koidl, K. Weindel, D. Marme, H. G. Augustin, and U. Fiedler
Expression of Angiopoietin-2 in Endothelial Cells Is Controlled by Positive and Negative Regulatory Promoter Elements
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., October 1, 2004; 24(10): 1803 - 1809.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
H. Wang, R. Fang, J.-Y. Cho, T. A. Libermann, and P. Oettgen
Positive and Negative Modulation of the Transcriptional Activity of the ETS Factor ESE-1 through Interaction with p300, CREB-binding Protein, and Ku 70/86
J. Biol. Chem., June 11, 2004; 279(24): 25241 - 25250.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
Y. Morikawa and P. Cserjesi
Extra-embryonic vasculature development is regulated by the transcription factor HAND1
Development, May 1, 2004; 131(9): 2195 - 2204.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
T. Seki, K.-H. Hong, J. Yun, S.-J. Kim, and S. P. Oh
Isolation of a Regulatory Region of Activin Receptor-Like Kinase 1 Gene Sufficient for Arterial Endothelium-Specific Expression
Circ. Res., April 30, 2004; 94(8): e72 - e77.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
B. Gottgens, C. Broccardo, M.-J. Sanchez, S. Deveaux, G. Murphy, J. R. Gothert, E. Kotsopoulou, S. Kinston, L. Delaney, S. Piltz, et al.
The scl +18/19 Stem Cell Enhancer Is Not Required for Hematopoiesis: Identification of a 5' Bifunctional Hematopoietic-Endothelial Enhancer Bound by Fli-1 and Elf-1
Mol. Cell. Biol., March 1, 2004; 24(5): 1870 - 1883.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
J. Gaspar, S. Thai, C. Voland, A. Dube, T. A. Libermann, M.L. Iruela-Arispe, and P. Oettgen
Opposing Functions of the Ets Factors NERF and ELF-1 During Chicken Blood Vessel Development
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., July 1, 2002; 22(7): 1106 - 1112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
P. Oettgen
Transcriptional Regulation of Vascular Development
Circ. Res., August 31, 2001; 89(5): 380 - 388.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
T. N. Sato
Transcriptional Regulation of Vascular Development
Circ. Res., February 2, 2001; 88(2): 127 - 128.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)