Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation Research
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation Research. 2001;88:1306-1313
Published online before print June 7, 2001, doi: 10.1161/hh1201.092994
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
88/12/1306    most recent
hh1201.092994v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vondriska, T. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ping, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vondriska, T. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ping, P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cell signalling/signal transduction
Right arrow Functional genomics
Right arrow Ischemic biology - basic studies
Right arrow Acute myocardial infarction
Right arrow Chronic ischemic heart disease
(Circulation Research. 2001;88:1306.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.


Integrative Physiology

Protein Kinase C {epsilon}–Src Modules Direct Signal Transduction in Nitric Oxide–Induced Cardioprotection

Complex Formation as a Means for Cardioprotective Signaling

Thomas M. Vondriska1, Jun Zhang1, Changxu Song1, Xian-Liang Tang, Xinan Cao, Christopher P. Baines, Jason M. Pass, Shaoshan Wang, Roberto Bolli, Peipei Ping

From the Department of Physiology and Biophysics (T.M.V., J.Z., C.S., X.C., C.P.B., J.M.P., R.B., P.P.) and Division of Cardiology (T.M.V., J.Z., C.S., X.-L.T., X.C., C.P.B., J.M.P., S.W., R.B., P.P.), Department of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, Ky.

Correspondence to Peipei Ping, PhD, Departments of Physiology and Biophysics, Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Suite 122 Baxter Bldg, 570 S Preston St, Louisville, KY 40202. E-mail peipeiping{at}hotmail.com

Abstract

Abstract—An essential role for protein kinase C {epsilon} (PKC{epsilon}) has been shown in multiple forms of cardioprotection; however, there is a distinct paucity of information concerning the signaling architecture that is responsible for the manifestation of a protective phenotype. We and others have recently shown that signal transduction may proceed via the formation of signaling complexes (Circ Res. 2001;88:59–62). In order to understand if the assembly of multiprotein complexes is the manner by which signaling is conducted in cardioprotection, we designed a series of experiments to characterize the associations of Src tyrosine kinase with PKC{epsilon} in a conscious rabbit model of nitric oxide (NO)-induced late preconditioning. Our data demonstrate that PKC{epsilon} and Src can form functional signaling modules in vitro: PKC{epsilon} interacts with Src; the association with PKC{epsilon} activates Src; and adult cardiac cells receiving recombinant adenoviruses encoding PKC{epsilon} exhibit increased Src activity. Furthermore, our results show that NO-induced late preconditioning involved PKC{epsilon}-Src module formation and enhanced the enzymatic activity of PKC{epsilon}-associated Src. Inhibition of PKC blocked cardioprotection, module formation, and PKC{epsilon}-associated Src activity, providing direct evidence for a functional role of the PKC{epsilon}-Src module in the orchestration of NO-induced cardioprotection in conscious rabbits.


Key Words: proteomics • ischemic injury • preconditioning • protein-protein interactions

The protein kinase C {epsilon} (PKC{epsilon}) signaling system in cardioprotection has two conceptual components: (1) the molecules that are involved in PKC{epsilon} signaling and (2) the manner in which these molecules interact with PKC{epsilon}. The first of these components has been extensively studied,1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 which has resulted in the identification of numerous signaling elements that may participate in PKC{epsilon}-mediated preconditioning (PC). However, the latter component, that is, the specific infrastructure established by these signaling elements to engender cardioprotection, remains undefined. Evidence from recent studies in numerous cellular theaters suggests that signal transduction may proceed via the formation of multiprotein signaling complexes.13 14 15 16 17 Our laboratory has shown that PKC{epsilon} forms signaling complexes with at least 36 proteins in the heart, and that PKC{epsilon}-mediated cardioprotection is associated with dynamic modulation of these complexes.17 Despite this, the specific manner in which PKC{epsilon} might interact with a member of its complex in order to perform functional signaling tasks is at present unknown.

Previous studies pertaining to the components of the signaling system in cardioprotection have implicated a role for tyrosine kinases.8 12 18 19 20 21 22 Our laboratory has reported that ischemic PC induces activation of Src in a PKC-dependent manner in conscious rabbits.8 Mounting evidence has demonstrated that the administration of a nitric oxide (NO) donor fully mimics the delayed cardioprotective effect afforded by ischemic PC.1 7 Furthermore, this pharmacological PC also utilizes a PKC{epsilon}-dependent signaling mechanism.1 7 However, the ability of, and the mechanism used by, NO to activate Src and to modulate the involvement of Src in NO-induced late PC in the myocardium remains to be elucidated. It was recently found in murine fibroblasts that Src could be induced to autophosphorylate and become active by NO,23 which raises the possibility that NO may activate Src via separate, non-PKC{epsilon}-dependent mechanisms in the heart. In rat cardiomyocytes, oxidative stress is effective in activating extracellular signal–regulated kinases (ERKs) via an Src-dependent pathway, a phenomenon which is not blocked by inhibitors of PKC and/or PKA.23 Therefore, it is unclear whether NO can activate Src in the myocardium, and whether this occurs via activation of PKC.

Analyses of PKC{epsilon} signaling complexes in the murine myocardium revealed that Src, a member of the Src family of nonreceptor tyrosine kinases, resides in the PKC{epsilon} complex.17 Although the individual roles of Src and PKC{epsilon} have been extensively studied,2 24 25 26 27 28 29 it remains unknown if PKC{epsilon} interacts with Src, and if so, whether their direct interaction promotes signal transduction, ie, whether association with PKC{epsilon} activates Src. The fulfillment of these criteria would indicate that PKC{epsilon} and Src constitute a signaling module.

Accordingly, we designed a study to comprehensively analyze the interactions of PKC{epsilon} and Src in NO-induced late PC. We reasoned that if signaling in NO-induced PC proceeds by the assembly of a module containing PKC{epsilon} and Src, then the association of Src with PKC{epsilon} in this fashion might lead to increased enzymatic activity of Src. To test this, we analyzed the enzymatic activity and subcellular localization of Src and the association of Src with the PKC{epsilon} signaling complex. The PKC inhibitor chelerythrine (CHE) was given, at a dose shown previously to block late NO-induced PC, to determine whether the formation of a PKC{epsilon}-Src module is an essential part of the signaling architecture that protects the heart against injury. We found that NO-induced cardioprotection involves the formation of a module containing PKC{epsilon} and Src in the particulate fraction. Association of Src with PKC{epsilon} in this module dynamically enhances Src kinase activity during the late phase of protection.

Materials and Methods

Recombinant Proteins and Reagents
In vitro studies used cDNAs of wild-type PKC{epsilon} (rabbit), wild-type Src (mouse), and a mutant of Src, which were cloned into the pAcGHLT vector, expressed in the baculovirus system, and purified to generate glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion proteins (Pharmingen). Cold or [35S]-methionine–labeled recombinant proteins of wild-type PKC{epsilon}, wild-type Src, and a mutant of Src (Y529F) were also made through in vitro transcription and translation using the TNT Quick-Coupled reticulocyte system (Promega). The GST-PKC{epsilon}, GST-Src, and the in vitro–translated PKC{epsilon} and Src were all verified to retain kinase activity (data not shown). Inhibitor sources were as follows: PKC inhibitors chelerythrine (Sigma) and GF109203X (Calbiochem); Src inhibitor PP2 (Calbiochem).

Assessing Protein-Protein Interactions Via GST Affinity Pull-Down Assays
Briefly, GST-recombinant proteins were immobilized on GST beads, mixed with either recombinant proteins of interest or rabbit myocardial homogenates, and incubated in binding buffer with various concentrations of NaCl, as previously reported.17 30 The GST-protein complexes were washed, resolved by SDS-PAGE, and analyzed via immunoblotting with antibodies against corresponding proteins. Parallel reactions were conducted using equal molar amounts of GST-null proteins in place of the tested GST-fusion proteins (negative control).

The Conscious Rabbit Model of DETA/NO-Induced Late PC
The present study was performed in accordance with the guidelines of the Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Louisville School of Medicine and with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (Department of Health and Human Services, publication No. [NIH] 86-23).

A well-established conscious rabbit model of NO-induced PC was used as previously described.7 31 32 Briefly, male New Zealand White rabbits (Myrtle’s Rabbitry Inc, Thompson Station, Tenn; 2.0 to 2.5 kg, age 3 to 4 months) were intravenously administered the NO donor diethylenetriamine/NO (DETA/NO, 0.1 mg/kg once every 25 minutes for 75 minutes; total dose of 0.4 mg/kg). This dose of DETA/NO has been shown to be sufficient to trigger activation of PKC{epsilon} on day 1 and to protect against myocardial infarction and stunning on day 2.7 31 32 To determine whether inhibition of PKC, which has been demonstrated to block NO-induced PC, would affect PKC{epsilon}-Src signaling module formation, the PKC inhibitor chelerythrine (CHE; dose 5 mg/kg) was given 5 minutes before the first DETA/NO injection.7 10 This dose of CHE has been shown to abolish NO-induced activation of PKC{epsilon} and to abrogate NO-induced late cardioprotection.7 10 Rabbits in control groups received vehicle. To characterize PKC{epsilon}-Src module formation during the temporal development of NO-induced PC, cardiac tissues were taken at two time points: (1) at 30 minutes after the last DETA/NO injection (day 1) and (2) at 24 hours after DETA/NO (day 2). Hearts were frozen and stored at -80°C. Before biochemical analysis, tissue samples were fractionated as previously reported.6

Recombinant Adenoviral-Mediated PKC{epsilon} Transfection in Adult Rabbit Cardiomyocytes
Recombinant adenoviruses encoding active PKC{epsilon} were used to produce activation of PKC{epsilon} in cardiomyocytes. Generation of recombinant viruses and isolation of adult cardiomyocytes were performed as detailed previously.5 9

Immunoprecipitation and Western Blotting
PKC{epsilon} and Src antibody-based immunoprecipitations were performed as previously documented.7 8 17 33 IgG (Sigma) was substituted to determine nonspecific binding. Immunoblotting was performed for PKC{epsilon} and Src as previously described.6 17 33

PKC{epsilon} and Src Activity Assays
The phosphorylation activity of PKC{epsilon} and Src was determined as previously described.7 8 Briefly, cytosolic or particulate samples were immunoprecipitated overnight with either PKC{epsilon} (Pharmingen) or Src (Santa Cruz) antibodies. The PKC{epsilon} phosphorylation activity was determined by incubating immunoprecipitates with the PKC{epsilon}-selective substrate (ERMRPRKRQGSVRRRV) in the PKC{epsilon} phosphorylation cocktail.7 Src phosphorylation activity was assessed by incubating the immunoprecipitates with either the Src-selective peptide (KVEKIGEGTYGVVYK) (Upstate) or enolase (Sigma) as substrates in the Src phosphorylation cocktail.8

The PKC{epsilon}-associated Src phosphorylation activity was determined by subjecting the PKC{epsilon}-immunoprecipitated complex to the Src phosphorylation assay using the peptide as a substrate.

Statistical Analysis
For ease of comparison, measurements of kinase activity or protein level in each individual experiment were expressed as a percentage of the average value for the respective control group. Differences among the experimental groups were analyzed using ANOVA. When necessary, post hoc contrasts and Student’s t tests for unpaired data using Bonferroni correction were performed.34 Data are reported as mean±SEM.

Results

PKC{epsilon} and Src Form a Functional Module
Recombinant PKC{epsilon} and GST-Src proteins were used to determine whether PKC{epsilon} and Src were binding partners. GST-Src was found to interact with PKC{epsilon} in vitro (Figure 1Down). The intensity of interaction between PKC{epsilon} and Src varied with NaCl concentration, indicating that the binding between these two molecules is ionic in nature (Figure 1ADown, lanes 1 through 3). Next, we determined whether Src colocalizes with PKC{epsilon} in the rabbit myocardium. Western immunoblots for Src revealed that endogenous Src associated with the GST-PKC{epsilon} complex (Figure 1BDown). Interestingly, the association of Src with the GST-PKC{epsilon} complexes was found to be subcellular location-specific, as only Src from the particulate fraction, and not that from the cytosolic, interacted with the GST-PKC{epsilon} complex (Figure 1BDown, lanes 8 and 9 and 3 and 4, respectively). To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration that PKC{epsilon} can bind directly to Src.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. In vitro PKC{epsilon}-Src module formation. A, GST-Src proteins were incubated with in vitro–translated/radiolabeled PKC{epsilon} proteins, and GST pull-down assays were performed. Autoradiographic signal showed that PKC{epsilon} associated with GST-Src, and the intensity of binding varied with NaCl concentrations, suggesting the interactions were ionic in nature. Lane 5 is in vitro–translated/[35S]-methionine–labeled PKC{epsilon} (positive control). B, Association between PKC{epsilon} and Src in cardiac tissue. Src from the particulate fraction was shown to interact with GST-PKC{epsilon} (lanes 8 and 9; lane 10 positive control), but Src from the cytosolic fraction did not interact with GST-PKC{epsilon} (lanes 3 and 4; lane 5 positive control), as detected by immunoblotting. C, In vitro–translated/[35S]-methionine–labeled wild-type (WT) Src (lanes 1 and 2, 5 and 6, and 9 and 10) or mutated (MT, Y529F) Src (lanes 3 and 4, 7 and 8, and 11 and 12) were incubated with various amounts of GST-PKC{epsilon} (lane 13, positive control). The Src MT exhibited higher affinity for PKC{epsilon}. D, GST-Src proteins were incubated, in the presence and absence of recombinant PKC{epsilon}, with Src substrate protein, enolase. Autophosphorylation of Src and PKC{epsilon} as well as phosphorylation of enolase by Src was seen (D, blot). As shown in lanes 3 and 4, PKC{epsilon} significantly increases Src phosphorylation of enolase. Next, Src activity was assessed with a peptide substrate in the presence and absence of PKC{epsilon} (D, graph). PKC{epsilon} induced an increase in the phosphorylation activity of GST-Src. E, Adult cardiomyocytes receiving recombinant PKC{epsilon} adenoviruses exhibited increased Src activity, which was blocked by inhibition of either PKC or Src.

To determine whether the conformation of Src affects its binding affinity for PKC{epsilon}, we performed GST pull-down assays using GST-PKC{epsilon} and in vitro–translated wild-type Src and the Y529F mutant Src, which exists in an open conformation (Figure 1CUp). GST-PKC{epsilon} exhibited stronger binding with the mutant Src than with wild-type Src, a phenomenon that appeared to be concentration-dependent (Figure 1CUp). These data show that when Src is in its open configuration, it displays higher binding affinity for PKC{epsilon}.

We then proceeded to assess whether the in vitro association of PKC{epsilon} and Src results in the transduction of a signal, that is, whether activation of PKC{epsilon} enhances Src activity. Active PKC{epsilon} was incubated with recombinant Src and the Src-specific substrate protein enolase. Activity of Src, as assessed by its phosphorylation of enolase, was significantly higher in the presence of PKC{epsilon} compared with that in the absence of PKC{epsilon} (Figure 1DUp), indicating that PKC{epsilon} activates Src. To verify this result, we also performed Src phosphorylation activity assay using the Src-selective substrate peptide.8 These data confirmed the finding that PKC{epsilon} induced activation of Src in vitro (Figure 1DUp).

To further characterize the interaction of PKC{epsilon} with Src in cardiomyocytes, we performed transfection experiments with adenoviruses encoding active PKC{epsilon}.5 9 Adult rabbit cardiomyocytes receiving PKC{epsilon} adenoviruses exhibited activation of PKC{epsilon}5 9 and displayed a marked increase in Src kinase activity (235.8±8.8% of null vector; P<0.05) (Figure 1EUp). Treatment with the PKC inhibitor GF109203X blocked activation of PKC{epsilon}5 as well as PKC{epsilon}-induced activation of Src (80.4±7% of null vector). As expected, Src activation was also blocked by the Src inhibitor PP2 (91.9±9.0% of null vector). These data indicate that, in adult cardiomyocytes, PKC{epsilon} activation is sufficient to stimulate increased Src kinase activity.

Increased Association of Src With the PKC{epsilon} Complex During the Development of NO-Induced Cardioprotection
We next examined whether the association of Src with the PKC{epsilon} complex was concomitant with the development of cardioprotection in vivo. It has been well documented that NO-induced PC requires activation of PKC.1 7 Although tyrosine kinases have been implicated in PC,8 12 20 35 the manner in which Src participates in PKC{epsilon}-dependent signaling during NO-induced PC is unknown. To address this issue, we determined whether NO-induced cardioprotective signaling involves the colocalization of Src and PKC{epsilon}, and whether the interactions of PKC{epsilon} and Src correspond with the temporal development of NO-induced PC. Rabbits were administered DETA/NO at a dose that has been previously demonstrated to generate a late phase of cardioprotection against infarction and stunning.1 7 31 32 We found that this dose of DETA/NO promoted recruitment of Src to the PKC{epsilon} complex. The amount of Src protein associated with the PKC{epsilon} complex was significantly increased at 30 minutes (187.0±1.1% of control; P<0.05) and at 24 hours (286.0±3.5% of control; P<0.05) after DETA/NO (Figure 2ADown). These data suggest that PKC{epsilon}-mediated signal transduction during the genesis (30 minutes) and the manifestation (24 hours) of NO-induced late PC involves an increased formation of PKC{epsilon}-Src modules.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. PKC{epsilon}-Src module formation enhances Src kinase activity in vivo. A, Representative immunoblot displaying PKC{epsilon}-associated Src in the particulate fraction. Data were obtained via PKC{epsilon} immunoprecipitation followed by immunoblotting for Src (parallel experiments detected no PKC{epsilon}-associated Src in the cytosolic fraction; data not shown). Graph depicts increased association of Src with the PKC{epsilon} complex at 30 minutes and 24 hours after DETA/NO. B, Particulate PKC{epsilon}-associated Src activity was found to be significantly increased at 30 minutes and 24 hours after DETA/NO. Inhibition of PKC{epsilon} with CHE abolished PKC{epsilon}-associated Src activity. C, When both particulate PKC{epsilon}-associated and non–PKC{epsilon}-associated Src were considered, the degree of increase in Src activity was markedly lower, indicating that PKC{epsilon}-associated Src exhibited higher phosphorylation activity than did non–PKC{epsilon}-associated Src.

Assembly of PKC{epsilon}-Src Modules Increases Src Enzymatic Activity In Vivo
In order to understand if, and the manner by which, complex formation might facilitate signal transduction in vivo, we determined the PKC{epsilon}-associated Src kinase activity in hearts from conscious rabbits. Cardiac tissues were immunoprecipitated with PKC{epsilon} antibodies and subjected to Src activity assay. In hearts obtained 30 minutes after DETA/NO administration, we observed a significant increase in PKC{epsilon}-associated Src kinase activity (181.0±0.4% of control; P<0.05) (Figure 2BUp). Of particular importance, in hearts obtained 24 hours after DETA/NO administration, we found a marked increase in the PKC{epsilon}-associated Src kinase activity (1082±319.1% of control; P<0.05) (Figure 2BUp), a magnitude of increase far exceeding that observed at 30 minutes. Importantly, when analysis of Src activity included both the non–PKC{epsilon}-associated Src and the PKC{epsilon}-associated Src (30 minutes: 141.5±2.6% of control; 24 hours: 277.0±5.4% of control; P<0.05) (Figure 2CUp), the increase in Src activity induced by NO was significantly less compared with the activity of PKC{epsilon}-associated Src alone. The basal Src activity measurements in control animals (data not shown) were comparable to those previously reported.8 Taken with the data shown in Figure 2BUp, these findings indicate that the PKC{epsilon}-associated Src accounted for the increased activity attributed to the particulate Src and exhibited higher activity than that of the non–PKC{epsilon}-associated Src.

These observations indicate that within the PKC{epsilon} complex, a module containing PKC{epsilon} and Src is formed, and that assembly of this module facilitates the transduction of a signal by increasing the enzymatic activity of Src.

NO-Induced Late PC Involves Increased Particulate Expression of PKC{epsilon} But Not Src
The subcellular alterations that could lead to increased module formation are undoubtedly extensive. However, four fundamental scenarios, designed to incorporate a range of conceivable biochemical changes that could result in increased module formation, are discussed in Figure 3Down. In the present study, we measured the level of expression and activity of PKC{epsilon} and Src during NO-induced PC to determine which, if any, of these mechanisms might contribute to increased module formation between PKC{epsilon} and Src.



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Schematic representation of the possible stoichiometric- or affinity-based changes that may occur to elicit increased module formation between two hypothetical signaling proteins, X and Y. A module is defined as the association between two or more proteins that leads to unidirectional or bidirectional (ie, mutual) posttranslational modification (eg, phosphorylation) and that results in signal transduction. We envision that a signaling complex may contain multiple modules.36 To investigate the observation that cardioprotection (along with other cellular phenomena) has been associated with dynamic regulation of multiprotein complexes, four plausible mechanisms were conceptualized that could theoretically lead to an increase in module assembly between X and Y. A, Enhanced affinity of X and Y for each other with no changes in the level of expression of either protein. B and C, Increased protein level of either, but not both, X or Y. D, Increase in protein level of both X and Y. The affinity between X and Y could be altered in numerous ways, such as intramolecular conformational changes that unmask domains or modification by other module members not considered in this binary model. Furthermore, there are various means by which the ratio of X to Y may change, for instance, transcriptional or translational regulation, sequestration (or loss thereof), or interaction with activator or inhibitor proteins. The experimental design described herein was formulated to provide evidence supporting which of these four mechanisms are used by the myocardial signaling architecture to regulate PKC{epsilon} and Src interaction during cardioprotection.

In agreement with our previous report,7 we found that DETA/NO induced PKC{epsilon} translocation at 30 minutes after NO-induced PC (Figure 4ADown). Moreover, we also observed significant translocation of PKC{epsilon} at 24 hours after NO-induced PC (Figure 4ADown). The increased particulate localization of PKC{epsilon} at 24 hours appeared to be partially supported by an increase of total PKC{epsilon} protein (196.3±20.0% of control; P<0.05), whereas total PKC{epsilon} expression was not altered at 30 minutes after DETA/NO (data not shown). Furthermore, inhibition of PKC with CHE before DETA/NO treatment abolished NO-induced translocation of PKC{epsilon} both at 30 minutes and at 24 hours (data not shown). CHE also abrogated the increased expression of PKC{epsilon} protein that was seen 24 hours later (127.1±5.0% of control).



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Mechanism for increased module formation during NO-induced PC. Representative immunoblots of cardiac particulate expression of PKC{epsilon} (A) and Src (B) are shown. Graph depicts increased PKC{epsilon} expression at 24 hours but not at 30 minutes after DETA/NO and no change in Src expression at either time point.

As shown in Figure 2BUp, DETA/NO induced a significant increase in the PKC{epsilon}-associated Src activity. We next examined the effect of NO on Src protein level at 30 minutes and 24 hours after DETA/NO. Our data show that Src expression remained unaltered at either 30 minutes or 24 hours after DETA/NO administration (Figure 4BUp). Furthermore, DETA/NO did not cause a subcellular redistribution of Src kinase (Figure 4BUp), in that the expression of Src was unchanged when either the total or the particulate fraction alone was considered at both 30 minutes (total Src: 8 3.6±6.0% of control; particulate Src: 105.0±0.9% of control) and at 24 hours (total Src: 121.4±21.7% of control; particulate Src: 102.4±0.4% of control). Treatment with CHE before DETA/NO treatment did not alter the expression of Src in either the total or particulate pool both at 30 minutes and 24 hours after DETA/NO administration (data not shown).

CHE Inhibits PKC{epsilon}-Src Module Formation and Blocks Cardioprotection
Previous studies have demonstrated that CHE, given at a dose that inhibits PKC{epsilon} activation, is sufficient to block the salubrious effects afforded by ischemic and NO-induced PC.7 10 In the present investigation, our data demonstrate that pretreatment with this same dose of CHE abolished DETA/NO-induced formation of PKC{epsilon}-Src modules both at 30 minutes (123.4±3.9% of control) and at 24 hours (75.4±0.6% of control) (Figure 5Down). In accordance with the disruption of module formation by CHE was the observation that CHE also attenuated the NO-induced increase in PKC{epsilon}-associated Src activity at 30 minutes (132.3±18.9% of control) and at 24 hours (95.8±10.3% of control) (Figure 2BUp). These data demonstrate that the activation of PKC by NO is a prerequisite for PKC{epsilon}-Src module formation and function 24 hours later. Furthermore, the assembly of PKC{epsilon}-Src modules was disrupted by the same mechanism that blocked cardioprotection, ie, inhibition of PKC{epsilon}.7 10 Together, these findings suggest that the formation of PKC{epsilon}-Src modules in response to NO is a mechanism by which the heart carries out cardioprotective signaling.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Activation of PKC{epsilon} is necessary for module formation during NO-induced late PC. Representative immunoblot for PKC{epsilon}-associated Src is shown. Graph displays that inhibition of PKC{epsilon} with CHE, given before DETA/NO, blocked the NO-induced PKC{epsilon}-Src module formation 24 hours after DETA/NO.

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate that the assembly of a signaling module is a means for cardiac cell signaling, and that the formation of signaling modules containing PKC{epsilon} and Src is an essential step in NO-induced cardioprotection. There are a number of salient observations in this study. In the in vitro setting, our data demonstrate that PKC{epsilon} interacts with Src, and that this interaction promotes the activation of Src. In cardiac cells and in the normal myocardium, our results show that formation of PKC{epsilon}-Src modules serves to accomplish signal transduction. In addition, the formation of PKC{epsilon}-Src modules is subcellular compartment-dependent, in that it only occurs in the particulate fraction. Finally, and of particular importance, we found that administration of an NO-donor promotes PKC{epsilon}-Src module formation during the development of cardioprotection in conscious rabbits. In NO-induced PC, the configuration of this module facilitates signal transduction by increasing PKC{epsilon}-associated Src kinase activity. Inhibition of PKC with CHE, at a dose that has previously been demonstrated to block NO-induced cardioprotection,7 10 was sufficient to abolish PKC{epsilon}-Src module formation and PKC{epsilon}-associated Src activity.

Module Formation as a Means for Signal Transduction
Recent advances in molecular technologies have allowed for the identification of molecules that participate in biochemical responses. However, the precise manner in which these molecules interact to transmit subcellular signals is unclear. Studies regarding signaling paradigms in noncardiac tissues have identified the assembly of signaling complexes as a means for signal transduction.13 14 15 16 Moreover, our laboratory has conducted an extensive characterization of the PKC{epsilon} signaling complex in the murine myocardium and found that Src (along with {approx}35 other proteins) is a member of this complex.17 In concert with these findings, we have proposed the "signaling module hypothesis" of PKC{epsilon},36 in which we suggest that the formation of stimulus- and subcellular location–specific signaling modules may be a mechanism whereby a multiprotein complex coordinates signal transduction.36

In the present study, we undertook the characterization of a module containing a serine/threonine kinase, PKC{epsilon}, and a tyrosine kinase, Src. Our data show that the formation of this module enhanced PKC{epsilon}-associated Src activity, indicating that the interaction of these two kinases promotes signal transduction. Molecular analyses of Src reveal that both the SH2 and the SH3 domains contain multiple PKC phosphorylation motifs (a.a. S/T-X-K/R). Several investigations have shown that the SH2 and SH3 domains are the preferred regions for interaction of Src tyrosine kinase with other proteins, including the epidermal growth factor receptors,37 the ß3-adrenergic receptors,14 and the receptors for activated C kinases.27 To our knowledge, the present study represents the first demonstration that PKC{epsilon} can directly interact with Src and that this interaction is sufficient to lead to the activation of Src.

NO-Induced Cardioprotection Requires PKC{epsilon}-Src Module Formation
To determine whether the assembly of multiprotein complexes serves as a means for cardioprotective signal transduction, we characterized the formation of PKC{epsilon}-Src modules during the genesis of NO-induced PC. We found that NO-induced late PC involves an increase in module formation between PKC{epsilon} and Src. This increase in association was accompanied by a dramatic (10-fold) enhancement of PKC{epsilon}-associated Src kinase activity only in the particulate fraction of the cell, indicating that the association of Src with the PKC{epsilon} signaling complex is a subcellular location-specific occurrence. It was also found that the PKC inhibitor CHE, given at a dose shown previously to abrogate the infarct- and stunning-sparing effects of NO-induced PC, was sufficient to block the increased PKC{epsilon}-Src module formation afforded by NO. In addition, this dose of CHE also attenuated the increase in PKC{epsilon}-associated Src activity that was seen 30 minutes and 24 hours after NO treatment. To our knowledge, no previous study has identified the formation of signaling modules as a mechanism of accomplishing signal transduction in vivo. Furthermore, the findings suggest that the formation of signaling complexes is not a random association of proteins or an artifact of immunoprecipitation procedures. Rather, the fact that association with PKC{epsilon} enhances Src enzymatic activity suggests that the formation of these modules is a highly organized event that facilitates the transmission of a subcellular signal. In view of the fact that both PKC{epsilon} and Src have been shown to play necessary roles in NO-induced PC,7 34 the data herein indicate that PKC{epsilon}-Src modules direct signal transduction in NO-induced cardioprotection.

While it has been shown that PKC{epsilon} associates with a large number of other proteins within a signaling complex, it is rational to hypothesize that not all of the proteins within the PKC{epsilon} complex participate in all of the physiological processes that involve PKC{epsilon}. Accordingly, we propose that signaling complexes, like the PKC{epsilon} complex characterized by our laboratory,17 which contain within them stimulus-responsive and subcellular location–specific modules, like the PKC{epsilon}-Src module that is described herein, may represent a means by which the cell uses multifunctional signaling elements to perform distinct subcellular tasks.36 For example, the PKC{epsilon}-Src signaling module is cardioprotective, whereas a different subset of proteins within the PKC{epsilon} complex containing connexin43, that would constitute a distinct module, may interact to coordinate excitation-contraction coupling.38

Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Module Formation
To elucidate the molecular mechanisms responsible for increased module formation, we characterized the expression levels of PKC{epsilon} and Src, as well as the nature of the affinity of these two molecules for each other. In these studies, we found that NO induced an increase in the particulate PKC{epsilon} protein at 30 minutes and at 24 hours, with no change in particulate Src protein at either of these time points (Figure 2Up). These data indicate that one of the mechanisms leading to increased complex formation between PKC{epsilon} and Src is an increase in the ratio of PKC{epsilon} protein to Src protein relative to basal conditions (Figure 3Up). Furthermore, we found that PKC{epsilon} and Src interactions only existed in the particulate fraction where Src has been reported to be in its open configuration.26 This evidence, combined with the in vitro finding that the open conformation of Src favors its interaction with PKC{epsilon} (Figure 1CUp), suggests that an altered affinity of Src for PKC{epsilon} may also contribute to the formation of PKC{epsilon}-Src modules (Figure 3Up).

Conclusion
A challenge for the development of pharmacological strategies that target specific signaling events is the physiological ubiquity of many of the proteins involved in protective phenomena (ie, preconditioning). In addition to participating in cardioprotection, both PKC{epsilon} and Src tyrosine kinase are also involved in numerous other signaling events across a variety of cell types. An essential step toward addressing this challenge is the characterization of the distinct manner in which proteins interact to define a module. This information would provide a level of specificity that could not be achieved solely from the biochemical properties of the individual molecules. Thus, rather than to activate a single molecule, which would impact multiple signaling events, future pharmacological and/or genetic interventions may be tailored to specifically recapitulate the endogenous interactions that constitute a protective module.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by AHA EIG-40167N (P.P.), NIH HL-63901 (P.P.), NIH HL-65431 (P.P.), NIH HL-43151 (R.B.), NIH HL-55757 (R.B.), the University of Louisville Research Foundation, the Commonwealth of Kentucky Research Challenge Trust Fund, and Jewish Hospital Research Foundation.

Footnotes

Original received March 21, 2001; revision received May 9, 2001; accepted May 14, 2001.

1 These authors contributed equally to this work. Back

This manuscript was sent to Eugene Braunwald, Consulting Editor, for review by expert referees, editorial decision, and final disposition.

References

1. Bolli R. The late phase of preconditioning. Circ Res. 2000;87:972–983.

2. Dorn GW II, Souroujon MC, Liron T, Chen CH, Gray MO, Zhou HZ, Csukai M, Wu G, Lorenz JN, Mochly-Rosen D. Sustained in vivo cardiac protection by a rationally designed peptide that causes {epsilon} protein kinase C translocation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:12798–12803.

3. Liu GS, Cohen MV, Mochly-Rosen D, Downey JM. Protein kinase C{epsilon} is responsible for the protection of preconditioning in rabbit cardiomyocytes. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1999;31:1937–1948.

4. Tong H, Chen W, Steenbergen C, Murphy E. Ischemic preconditioning activates phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase upstream of protein kinase C. Circ Res. 2000;87:309–315.

5. Li RC, Ping P, Zhang J, Wead WB, Cao X, Gao J, Zheng Y, Huang S, Han J, Bolli R. PKC{epsilon} modulates NF-{kappa}B and AP-1 via mitogen-activated protein kinases in adult rabbit cardiomyocytes. Am J Physiol. 2000;279:H1679–H1689.

6. Ping P, Zhang J, Qiu Y, Tang XL, Manchikalapudi S, Cao X, Bolli R. Ischemic preconditioning induces selective translocation of protein kinase C isoforms {epsilon} and {eta} in the heart of conscious rabbits without a subcellular redistribution of total protein kinase C activity. Circ Res. 1997;81:404–414.

7. Ping P, Takano H, Zhang J, Tang XL, Qiu Y, Li RC, Banerjee S, Dawn B, Balafanova Z, Bolli R. Isoform-selective activation of protein kinase C by nitric oxide in the heart of conscious rabbits: a signaling mechanism for both nitric oxide-induced and ischemia-induced preconditioning. Circ Res. 1999;84:587–604.

8. Ping P, Zhang J, Zheng YT, Li RC, Dawn B, Tang XL, Takano H, Balafanova Z, Bolli R. Demonstration of selective protein kinase C-dependent activation of Src and Lck tyrosine kinases during ischemic preconditioning in conscious rabbits. Circ Res. 1999;85:542–550.

9. Ping P, Zhang J, Cao X, Li RC, Kong D, Tang XL, Qiu Y, Manchikalapudi S, Auchampach JA, Black RG, Bolli R. PKC-dependent activation of p44/p42 MAPKs during myocardial ischemia-reperfusion in conscious rabbits. Am J Physiol. 1999;276:H1468–H1481.

10. Qiu Y, Ping P, Tang XL, Manchikalapudi S, Rizvi A, Zhang J, Takano H, Wu WJ, Teschner S, Bolli R. Direct evidence that protein kinase C plays an essential role in the development of late preconditioning against myocardial stunning in conscious rabbits and that {epsilon} is the isoform involved. J Clin Invest. 1998;101:2182–2198.

11. Xuan YT, Tang XL, Qiu Y, Banerjee S, Takano H, Han H, Bolli R. Biphasic response of cardiac NO synthase isoforms to ischemic preconditioning in conscious rabbits. Am J Physiol. 2000;279:H2360–H2371.

12. Nakano A, Cohen MV, Downey JM. Ischemic preconditioning: from basic mechanisms to clinical applications. Pharmacol Ther. 2000;86:263–275.

13. Husi H, Ward MA, Choudhary JS, Blackstock WP, Grant SG. Proteomic analysis of NMDA receptor-adhesion protein signaling complexes. Nat Neurosci. 2000;3:661–669.

14. Cao W, Luttrell LM, Medvedev AV, Pierce KL, Daniel KW, Dixon TM, Lefkowitz RJ, Collins S. Direct binding of activated c-Src to the ß3-adrenergic receptor is required for MAP kinase activation. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:38131–38134.

15. Fraser ID, Cong M, Kim J, Rollins EN, Daaka Y, Lefkowitz RJ, Scott JD. Assembly of an A-kinase-anchoring protein-ß2-adrenergic receptor complex facilitates receptor phosphorylation and signaling. Curr Biol. 2000;10:409–412.

16. Yasuda J, Whitmarsh AJ, Cavanagh J, Sharma M, Davis RJ. The JIP group of mitogen-activated protein kinase scaffold proteins. Mol Cell Biol. 1999;19:7245–7254.

17. Ping P, Zhang J, Pierce WM Jr, Bolli R. Functional proteomic analysis of protein kinase C {epsilon} signaling complexes in the normal heart and during cardioprotection. Circ Res. 2001;88:59–62.

18. Vahlhaus C, Schulz R, Post H, Rose J, Heusch G. Prevention of ischemic preconditioning only by combined inhibition of protein kinase C and protein tyrosine kinases in pigs. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1998;30:197–209.

19. Baines CP, Wang L, Cohen MV, Downey JM. Protein tyrosine kinase is downstream of protein kinase C for ischemic preconditioning’s anti-infarct effect in the rabbit heart. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1998;30:383–392.

20. Maulik N, Yoshida T, Zu YL, Sato M, Banerjee A, Das DK. Ischemic preconditioning triggers tyrosine kinase signaling: a potential role for MAPKAP kinase 2. Am J Physiol. 1998;275:H1857–H1864.

21. Fryer RM, Schultz JE, Hsu AK, Gross GJ. Importance of PKC and tyrosine kinase in single or multiple cycles of preconditioning in rat hearts. Am J Physiol. 1999;276:H1229–H1235.

22. Dana A, Skarli M, Papakrivopoulou J, Yellon DM. Adenosine A1 receptor induced delayed preconditioning in rabbits: induction of p38 MAPK activation and Hsp 27 phosphorylation via a tyrosine kinase- and protein kinase C-dependent mechanism. Circ Res. 2000;86:989–997.

23. Akhand AA, Pu M, Senga T, Kato M, Suzuki H, Miyata T, Hamaguchi M, Nakashima I. Nitric oxide controls Src kinase activity through a sulfhydryl group modification-mediated Tyr-527-independent and Tyr-416-linked mechanism. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:25821–25826.

24. Aikawa R, Komuro I, Yamazaki T, Zou Y, Kudoh S, Tanaka M, Shiojima I, Hiroi Y, Yazaki Y. Oxidative stress activates extracellular signal-regulated kinases through Src and Ras in cultured cardiac myocytes of neonatal rats. J Clin Invest. 1997;100:1813–1821.

25. Haendeler J, Berk BC. Angiotensin II mediated signal transduction: important role of tyrosine kinases. Regul Pept. 2000;95:1–7.

26. Sicheri F, Kuriyan J. Structures of Src-family tyrosine kinases. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 1997;7:777–785.

27. Chang BY, Conroy KB, Machleder EM, Cartwright CA. RACK1, a receptor for activated C kinase and a homolog of the ß subunit of G proteins, inhibits activity of Src tyrosine kinases and growth of NIH 3T3 cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1998;18:3245–3256.

28. Dempsey EC, Newton AC, Mochly-Rosen D, Fields AP, Reyland ME, Insel PA, Messing RO. Protein kinase C isozymes and the regulation of diverse cell responses. Am J Physiol. 2000;279:L429—L438.

29. Takeishi Y, Ping P, Bolli R, Kirkpatrick DL, Hoit BD, Walsh RA. Transgenic overexpression of constitutively active protein kinase C {epsilon} causes concentric cardiac hypertrophy. Circ Res. 2000;86:1218–1223.

30. Phizicky EM, Fields S. Protein-protein interactions: methods for detection and analysis. Microbiol Rev. 1995;59:94–123.

31. Shinmura K, Tang XL, Takano H, Hill M, Bolli R. Nitric oxide donors attenuate myocardial stunning in conscious rabbits. Am J Physiol. 1999;277:H2495–H2503.

32. Takano H, Tang XL, Qiu Y, Guo Y, French BA, Bolli R. Nitric oxide donors induce late preconditioning against myocardial stunning and infarction in conscious rabbits via an antioxidant-sensitive mechanism. Circ Res. 1998;83:73–84.

33. Pass JM, Zheng YT, Wead WB, Zhang J, Li RC, Bolli R, Ping P. PKC{epsilon} activation induces dichotomous cardiac phenotypes and modulates PKC{epsilon}-RACK interactions and RACK expression. Am J Physiol. 2001;280:H946–H955.

34. Wallenstein S, Zucker CL, Fleiss JL. Some statistical methods useful in circulation research. Circ Res. 1980;47:1–9.

35. Tang XL, Kodani E, Takano H, Hill M, Ping P, Bolli R. Protein tyrosine kinase signaling is necessary for NO donor-induced late preconditioning against myocardial stunning in conscious rabbits. J Mol Cell Cardiol. Abstract. In press.

36. Vondriska TM, Klein JB, Ping P. Use of functional proteomics to investigate PKC{epsilon}-mediated cardioprotection: the signaling module hypothesis. Am J Physiol. 2001;280:H1434–H1441.

37. Luttrell DK, Lee A, Lansing TJ, Crosby RM, Jung KD, Willard D, Luther M, Rodriquez M, Berman J, Gilmer TM. Involvement of pp60c-src with two major signaling pathways in human breast cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994;91:83–87.

38. Doble BW, Ping P, Kardami E. The {epsilon} subtype of protein kinase C is required for cardiomyocyte connexin-43 phosphorylation. Circ Res. 2000;86:293–301.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
I. Moench, H. Prentice, Z. Rickaway, and H. Weissbach
Sulindac confers high level ischemic protection to the heart through late preconditioning mechanisms
PNAS, November 17, 2009; 106(46): 19611 - 19616.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Pharmacol. Rev.Home page
P. Ferdinandy, R. Schulz, and G. F. Baxter
Interaction of Cardiovascular Risk Factors with Myocardial Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury, Preconditioning, and Postconditioning
Pharmacol. Rev., December 1, 2007; 59(4): 418 - 458.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
G.-X. Zhang, X.-M. Lu, S. Kimura, and A. Nishiyama
Role of mitochondria in angiotensin II-induced reactive oxygen species and mitogen-activated protein kinase activation
Cardiovasc Res, November 1, 2007; 76(2): 204 - 212.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
P. Pasdois, C. L. Quinlan, A. Rissa, L. Tariosse, B. Vinassa, A. D. T. Costa, S. V. Pierre, P. Dos Santos, and K. D. Garlid
Ouabain protects rat hearts against ischemia-reperfusion injury via pathway involving src kinase, mitoKATP, and ROS
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 2007; 292(3): H1470 - H1478.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
J. R. Slupsky, A. S. Kamiguti, R. J. Harris, J. C. Cawley, and M. Zuzel
Central Role of Protein Kinase C{epsilon} in Constitutive Activation of ERK1/2 and Rac1 in the Malignant Cells of Hairy Cell Leukemia
Am. J. Pathol., February 1, 2007; 170(2): 745 - 754.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
K. Inagaki, E. Churchill, and D. Mochly-Rosen
Epsilon protein kinase C as a potential therapeutic target for the ischemic heart
Cardiovasc Res, May 1, 2006; 70(2): 222 - 230.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
E. McGregor and M. J. Dunn
Proteomics of the Heart: Unraveling Disease
Circ. Res., February 17, 2006; 98(3): 309 - 321.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
A. M. Samarel
Costameres, focal adhesions, and cardiomyocyte mechanotransduction
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2005; 289(6): H2291 - H2301.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
S. L. Robia, M. Kang, and J. W. Walker
Novel determinant of PKC-{epsilon} anchoring at cardiac Z-lines
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2005; 289(5): H1941 - H1950.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
T. Okada, H. Otani, Y. Wu, T. Uchiyama, S. Kyoi, R. Hattori, T. Sumida, H. Fujiwara, and H. Imamura
Integrated pharmacological preconditioning and memory of cardioprotection: role of protein kinase C and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 2005; 289(2): H761 - H767.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
Y. Zhang, D. E. Handy, and J. Loscalzo
Adenosine-Dependent Induction of Glutathione Peroxidase 1 in Human Primary Endothelial Cells and Protection Against Oxidative Stress
Circ. Res., April 29, 2005; 96(8): 831 - 837.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
G. Wang, D. A. Liem, T. M. Vondriska, H. M. Honda, P. Korge, D. M. Pantaleon, X. Qiao, Y. Wang, J. N. Weiss, and P. Ping
Nitric oxide donors protect murine myocardium against infarction via modulation of mitochondrial permeability transition
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 2005; 288(3): H1290 - H1295.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
J. Zhang, C. P. Baines, C. Zong, E. M. Cardwell, G. Wang, T. M. Vondriska, and P. Ping
Functional proteomic analysis of a three-tier PKC{varepsilon}-Akt-eNOS signaling module in cardiac protection
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, February 1, 2005; 288(2): H954 - H961.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
J. Zhang, P. Ping, G.-W. Wang, M. Lu, D. Pantaleon, X.-L. Tang, R. Bolli, and T. M. Vondriska
Bmx, a member of the Tec family of nonreceptor tyrosine kinases, is a novel participant in pharmacological cardioprotection
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2004; 287(5): H2364 - H2366.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
P. Ping
Identification of Novel Signaling Complexes by Functional Proteomics
Circ. Res., October 3, 2003; 93(7): 595 - 603.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
M. C. Heidkamp, A. L. Bayer, B. T. Scully, D. M. Eble, and A. M. Samarel
Activation of focal adhesion kinase by protein kinase C{epsilon} in neonatal rat ventricular myocytes
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, October 1, 2003; 285(4): H1684 - H1696.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
J. Zhang, P. Ping, T. M. Vondriska, X.-L. Tang, G.-W. Wang, E. M. Cardwell, and R. Bolli
Cardioprotection involves activation of NF-{kappa}B via PKC-dependent tyrosine and serine phosphorylation of I{kappa}B-{alpha}
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, October 1, 2003; 285(4): H1753 - H1758.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
J. N. Weiss, P. Korge, H. M. Honda, and P. Ping
Role of the Mitochondrial Permeability Transition in Myocardial Disease
Circ. Res., August 22, 2003; 93(4): 292 - 301.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
J. Xu, B. Jian, R. Chu, Z. Lu, Q. Li, J. Dunlop, S. Rosenzweig-Lipson, P. McGonigle, R. J. Levy, and B. Liang
Serotonin Mechanisms in Heart Valve Disease II: The 5-HT2 Receptor and Its Signaling Pathway in Aortic Valve Interstitial Cells
Am. J. Pathol., December 1, 2002; 161(6): 2209 - 2218.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
U. Schwanke, I. Konietzka, A. Duschin, X. Li, R. Schulz, and G. Heusch
No ischemic preconditioning in heterozygous connexin43-deficient mice
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, October 1, 2002; 283 (4): H1740 - H1742.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
D. Garcia-Dorado, M. Ruiz-Meana, F. Padilla, A. Rodriguez-Sinovas, and M. Mirabet
Gap junction-mediated intercellular communication in ischemic preconditioning
Cardiovasc Res, August 15, 2002; 55(3): 456 - 465.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
G.F Baxter
Role of adenosine in delayed preconditioning of myocardium
Cardiovasc Res, August 15, 2002; 55(3): 483 - 494.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
O. Oldenburg, Q. Qin, A. R Sharma, M. V Cohen, J. M Downey, and J. N Benoit
Acetylcholine leads to free radical production dependent on KATP channels, Gi proteins, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and tyrosine kinase
Cardiovasc Res, August 15, 2002; 55(3): 544 - 552.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
B. Dawn, H. Takano, X.-L. Tang, E. Kodani, S. Banerjee, A. Rezazadeh, Y. Qiu, and R. Bolli
Role of Src protein tyrosine kinases in late preconditioning against myocardial infarction
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 2002; 283(2): H549 - H556.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
P. Robin, I. Boulven, C. Desmyter, S. Harbon, and D. Leiber
ET-1 stimulates ERK signaling pathway through sequential activation of PKC and Src in rat myometrial cells
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, July 1, 2002; 283(1): C251 - C260.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. ProteomicsHome page
R. D. Edmondson, T. M. Vondriska, K. J. Biederman, J. Zhang, R. C. Jones, Y. Zheng, D. L. Allen, J. X. Xiu, E. M. Cardwell, M. R. Pisano, et al.
Protein Kinase C {epsilon} Signaling Complexes Include Metabolism- and Transcription/Translation-related Proteins: Complimentary Separation Techniques With LC/MS/MS
Mol. Cell. Proteomics, June 1, 2002; 1(6): 421 - 433.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Z. Balafanova, R. Bolli, J. Zhang, Y. Zheng, J. M. Pass, A. Bhatnagar, X.-L. Tang, O. Wang, E. Cardwell, and P. Ping
Nitric Oxide (NO) Induces Nitration of Protein Kinase Cepsilon (PKCepsilon ), Facilitating PKCepsilon Translocation via Enhanced PKCepsilon -RACK2 Interactions. A NOVEL MECHANISM OF NO-TRIGGERED ACTIVATION OF PKCepsilon
J. Biol. Chem., April 19, 2002; 277(17): 15021 - 15027.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
C. P. Baines, J. Zhang, G.-W. Wang, Y.-T. Zheng, J. X. Xiu, E. M. Cardwell, R. Bolli, and P. Ping
Mitochondrial PKC{epsilon} and MAPK Form Signaling Modules in the Murine Heart: Enhanced Mitochondrial PKC{epsilon}-MAPK Interactions and Differential MAPK Activation in PKC{epsilon}-Induced Cardioprotection
Circ. Res., March 8, 2002; 90(4): 390 - 397.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
C. Song, T. M. Vondriska, G.-W. Wang, J. B. Klein, X. Cao, J. Zhang, Y. J. Kang, S. D'Souza, and P. Ping
Molecular conformation dictates signaling module formation: example of PKCepsilon and Src tyrosine kinase
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 2002; 282(3): H1166 - H1171.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
H. Ninomiya, H. Otani, K. Lu, T. Uchiyama, M. Kido, and H. Imamura
Enhanced IPC by activation of pertussis toxin-sensitive and -insensitive G protein-coupled purinoceptors
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2002; 282(5): H1933 - H1943.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J.L. Mehta, H.J. Chen, and D.Y. Li
Protection of Myocytes From Hypoxia-Reoxygenation Injury by Nitric Oxide Is Mediated by Modulation of Transforming Growth Factor-{beta}1
Circulation, May 7, 2002; 105(18): 2206 - 2211.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
88/12/1306    most recent
hh1201.092994v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vondriska, T. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ping, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vondriska, T. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ping, P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cell signalling/signal transduction
Right arrow Functional genomics
Right arrow Ischemic biology - basic studies
Right arrow Acute myocardial infarction
Right arrow Chronic ischemic heart disease