Editorial |
From the Section of Developmental Biology and Biophysics, Departments of Pediatrics and Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Boyer Center for Molecular Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn.
Correspondence to Steve A.N. Goldstein, 295 Congress Ave, New Haven, CT 06536. E-mail steve.goldstein{at}yale.edu
Key Words: potassium channels KCNE2 MiRP1 IKr Ito
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
subunit to achieve
its potential. In this issue of
Circulation Research, Zhang et
al1 show that MiRP1 (encoded
by the KCNE2 gene) can alter
the function of Kv4 family subunits (which contribute to
Ito,
transient outward currents in heart and brain) when they are expressed
together in Xenopus oocytes.
After recent reports that MiRP1 affects the behavior of
HERG2 3 4 5 6
and MiRP2 affects the function of KCNQ1, KCNQ4, HERG, and
Kv3.4,7 8 the MiRP
subunits have been accused of widespread promiscuous partnering.
Whether this salacious charge is a valid reflection of natural
physiology is the critical issue at hand.
MinK and its four recognized relations (MiRP1 through
MiRP4 encoded by KCNE1 through
KCNE5) are diminutive
single-transmembrane subunits that coassemble with
subunits during
protein translation to form stable
complexes9 10
(Figure
).
In doing so, MinK alters the gating kinetics, permeation attributes,
and pharmacology of KCNQ1
subunits to yield the attributes
recorded for native cardiac
IKs
channels.11 12
So, too, MiRP1 and HERG combine to create complexes with unique
functions that recapitulate the properties of cardiac
IKr
channels.2 3 4 5 6
In each of these cases, inherited mutations in either the MiRP or its
associated
subunit partner have been linked to similar
pathophysiology. The present work by Zhang et
al1 indicates that MiRP1 can
alter the function of Kv4 subunits in experimental cells and demands we
consider the possibility that MiRP subunits play a central role in
determining cardiovascular excitability through influence over
IKs,
IKr, and
Ito
channels.
|
In general, three criteria have been used to judge whether a subunit-subunit complex is formed in nature. First, are the subunits expressed in the same native cells at the same time in complexes as assessed at the protein level? Second, when studied in experimental cells, does the complex recapitulate the attributes and pharmacology of native channels? Third, are the subunits both genetically associated with the same physiological or disease processes?
The first criterion is best assessed by
coimmunoprecipitation and coimmunolocalization using native cells; the
third demands patient recruitment, careful clinical assessment, and the
capacity to perform molecular genetic analyses. In this
discussion, we consider the second criterion, the place where most
studies of accessory subunits begin and culminate. Failure of cloned
subunits expressed in an experimental cell to recapitulate a native
current often starts the hunt for a missing subunit, with correlation
of new attributes and native currents being the desired outcome.
However, studies that seek to correlate clones and native currents are
difficult endeavors: recordings of native currents are not
always feasible, nonidentical native channels can behave similarly, and
identical channels can function differently in different cells and even
show altered behavior in the same cell type in health and disease.
Similarly, clones expressed in experimental cells will show
variable attributes because of altered gene expression, mRNA
processing, subunit composition, and channel modulation.
Thus, it was an endogenous KCNQ1 subunit
in Xenopus laevis oocytes that
allowed the expression cloning of
MinK11 13 (and
the apparent absence of such in Chinese hamster ovary [CHO] cells
that offers electrical silence with MinK until an
subunit partner
is
provided14 15 ).
The slow-activation kinetics of MinK-induced currents in oocytes
suggested their correlation with
IKs
currents; however, induction of chloride currents with immoderate
amounts of injected MinK
cRNA16 (resulting from
nonspecific calcium influx attributable to profound overexpression of
these transmembrane
subunits17 18 )
confounded initial attempts at characterization and eventual molecular
correlation of MinK with cardiac and auditory
IKs
channels.11 12
Another example of the influence of expression
environment is offered by MiRP1/HERG
complexes.2 3
Whereas the subunits coassemble in both CHO cells and oocytes to form
channels that resemble cardiac
IKr
channels in their gating and permeation properties, the class III agent
E-4031 blocks MiRP1/HERG channels in CHO cells (and native cardiac
IKr
channels) in the closed state, producing tonic blockade, and
additionally demonstrates ready usedependent inhibition with cyclical
stimulation. Conversely, MiRP1/HERG complexes in oocytes show no
closed-state blockade and slow relaxation to equilibrium inhibition
with
200-fold lower sensitivity.
Considerations such as these support the utility, when allowed by favorable experimental conditions, of side-by-side comparisons of cloned and native channels in both wild-type and mutant form to establish molecular identity. For example, simultaneous characterization of the attributes of MiRP2/Kv3.4 channels in CHO cells and native channels in a skeletal muscle cell line suggested the physiological correlation of these subthreshold activating currents that set resting membrane potential.8 Identity was supported by isolation of an inherited MiRP2 missense mutation associated with periodic paralysis, because expression of the mutant subunit in both CHO and skeletal muscle cells revealed its dominant suppression of both current density and perturbation of resting potential.
Once a native interaction is supported, heterologous expression can provide additional insights that might otherwise be difficult to ascertain. For example, some arrhythmia-associated mutations through KCNQ1 have only mild effects when expressed without MinK but markedly inhibit current in mixed MinK/KCNQ1 complexes.19 Similarly, arrhythmia-associated HERG mutations that showed only mild abnormalities expressed on their own (making it difficult to rationalize the pathogenesis) were able to act as dominant suppressors in MiRP1/HERG complexes.6 Moreover, perturbation of native channel function by adenovirus-mediated overexpression of wild-type and mutant forms of HERG or MinK in cardiac myocytes is now facilitating characterization of gene-specific mechanisms of arrhythmogenesis.20
Zhang et al1 fully recognize these demands of clone/native channel identification, being careful to stress that the effects of MiRP1 on Kv4.2 in oocytes provide a starting point toward addressing the possibility of their native association. (Although we also observe evidence for interaction of the subunits in oocytes,21 we suspect these complexes will function primarily in the central nervous system rather than the heart.) Furthermore, some of the conclusions drawn by Zhang et al1 are questionable because of the unorthodox manner in which the experiments were executed. For example, injection of cRNAs asynchronously and at unusual levels likely explains failure to repeat earlier reports of functional modulation of HERG by MiRP1,2 3 4 5 6 including one from the same laboratory.22
Thus far, three MiRP/
-subunit complexes have
garnered considerable support as molecular correlates for native
currents: MinK/KCNQ1, MiRP1/HERG, and MiRP2/Kv3.4. Hints that MiRPs may
partner more broadly suggest that the array of complexes in native
cells will be significantly larger. And yet the questions remain more
numerous than the answers. Is MiRP1 central to
cardiovascular excitability through interaction with
multiple myocardial
subunits? Will other types of pore-forming
subunits with similar topology associate with MiRPs (for example,
pacemaker and cyclic-nucleotidegated channel subunits)?
Will native complexes contain MiRPs under some conditions and not
others? Do native complexes contain more than one MiRP type at the same
time? Where do MiRPs contact their pore-forming partners? Do
MiRP/
-subunit complexes show variable subunit stoichiometry (and
how many MiRPs are in a complex)?
Do all voltage-gated potassium channels use MiRPs? Although there is no a priori reason to posit a MiRP for every channel complex, this irritating notion remains a viable and exciting possibility.
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Abbott GW, Sesti F, Splawski I, Buck M, Lehmann MH, Timothy KW, Keating MT, Goldstein SAN. MiRP1 forms IKr potassium channels with HERG and is associated with cardiac arrhythmia. Cell. 1999;97:175187.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3.
Sesti F,
Abbott GW, Wei J, Murray KT, Saksena S, Schwartz PJ, Priori SG, Roden
DM, George AL Jr, Goldstein SA. A common polymorphism associated
with antibiotic-induced cardiac arrhythmia.
Proc Natl Acad Sci
U S A. 2000;97:1061310618.
4.
Tapper AR,
George AL. MinK subdomains that mediate modulation of and association
with KvLQT1. J Gen
Physiol. 2000;116:379389.
5. Cui J, Melman Y, Palma E, Fishman GI, McDonald TV. Cyclic AMP regulates the HERG K+ channel by dual pathways. Curr Biol. 2000;10:671674.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Cui J, Kagan A, Qin D, Mathew J, Melman YF, McDonald TV. Analysis of the cyclic nucleotide-binding domain of the HERG potassium channel and interactions with KCNE2. J Biol Chem. February 26, 2001;10.1074/jbc.M010904200. Available at: http://www.jbc.org. Accessed April 25, 2001.
7. Schroeder BC, Waldegger S, Fehr S, Bleich M, Warth R, Greger R, Jentsch TJ. A constitutively open potassium channel formed by KCNQ1 and KCNE3. Nature. 2000;403:196199.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Abbott GW, Butler MH, Bendahhou S, Dalakas MC, Ptacek LJ, Goldstein SAN. MiRP2 forms potassium channels in skeletal muscle with Kv3.4 and is associated with periodic paralysis. Cell. 2001;104:217231.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Abbott GW, Goldstein SAN. A superfamily of small potassium channel subunits: form and function of the MinK-related peptides (MiRPs). Q Rev Biophys. 1998;31:357398.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Abbott GW, Goldstein SAN. The KCNE superfamily of potassium channel subunits: physiology and pathophysiology of the MinK-related peptides (MiRPs). Mol Interventions. In press.
11. Sanguinetti MC, Curran ME, Zou A, Shen J, Spector PS, Atkinson DL, Keating MT. Coassembly of K(V)Lqt1 and MinK (Isk) proteins to form cardiac I-Ks potassium channel. Nature. 1996;384:8083.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Barhanin J, Lesage F, Guillemare E, Fink M, Lazdunski M, Romey G. K(V)LQT1 and IsK (MinK) proteins associate to form the I(Ks) cardiac potassium current. Nature. 1996;384:7880.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13.
Takumi T,
Ohkubo H, Nakanishi S. Cloning of a membrane protein that induces a
slow voltage-gated potassium current.
Science. 1988;242:10421045.
14. Lesage F, Attali B, Lakey J, Honore E, Romey G, Faurobert E, Lazdunski M, Barhanin J. Are Xenopus oocytes unique in displaying functional IsK channel heterologous expression? Receptors Channels. 1993;1:14352.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15.
Sesti F,
Goldstein SAN. Single-channel characteristics of wildtype IKs channels
and channels formed with two MinK mutants that cause long QT syndrome.
J Gen Physiol. 1998;112:651664.
16. Attali B, Guillemare E, Lesage F, Honore E, Romey G, Lazdunski M, Barhanin J. The protein IsK is a dual activator of K+ and Cl- channels. Nature. 1993;365:850852.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Tzounopoulos T, Maylie J, Adelman JP. Induction of endogenous channels by high levels of heterologous membrane proteins in Xenopus oocytes. Biophys J. 1995;69:904908.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Shimbo K, Brassard DL, Lamb RA, Pinto LH. Viral and cellular small integral membrane proteins can modify ion channels endogenous to Xenopus oocytes. Biophys J. 1995;69:18191829.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19.
Franqueza
L, Lin M, Shen J, Splawski I, Keating MT, Sanguinetti MC. Long QT
syndrome-associated mutations in the S4-S5 linker of KvLQT1 potassium
channels modify gating and interaction with MinK subunits.
J Biol Chem. 1999;274:2106321070.
20.
Hoppe UC,
Marbán E, Johns DC. Distinct gene-specific mechanisms of
arrhythmia revealed by cardiac gene transfer of two long QT disease
genes, HERG and KCNE1. Proc Natl Acad Sci
U S A. 2001;98:53355340.
21. Kim LA, Abbott GW, Butler MH, Goldstein SAN. A role for MiRP1-Kv4.2 in CNS A-type currents? Biophys J. 2001;80:437a. Abstract.
22. Dun W, Jiang M, Tseng G. Ko modulation of HERG deactivation involves multiple channel domains and is affected by hMiRP1. Biophys J. 2000;78:341a. Abstract.
23.
Doyle DA,
Morais Cabral J, Pfuetzner RA, Kuo A, Gulbis JM, Cohen SL, Chait BT,
MacKinnon R. The structure of the potassium channel: molecular basis of
K+ conduction and selectivity.
Science. 1998;280:6977.
24. Wang KW, Goldstein SAN. Subunit composition of MinK potassium channels. Neuron. 1995;14:13039.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25.
Wang W, Xia
J, Kass RS. MinK-KvLQT1 fusion proteins, evidence for multiple
stoichiometries of the assembled IsK channel.
J Biol Chem. 1998;273:3406934074.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. A. Kaulin, J. A. De Santiago-Castillo, C. A. Rocha, M. S. Nadal, B. Rudy, and M. Covarrubias The Dipeptidyl-Peptidase-Like Protein DPP6 Determines the Unitary Conductance of Neuronal Kv4.2 Channels J. Neurosci., March 11, 2009; 29(10): 3242 - 3251. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. H. Yu, V. Yarov-Yarovoy, G. A. Gutman, and W. A. Catterall Overview of Molecular Relationships in the Voltage-Gated Ion Channel Superfamily Pharmacol. Rev., December 1, 2005; 57(4): 387 - 395. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Nerbonne and R. S. Kass Molecular Physiology of Cardiac Repolarization Physiol Rev, October 1, 2005; 85(4): 1205 - 1253. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. Hebert, G. Desir, G. Giebisch, and W. Wang Molecular Diversity and Regulation of Renal Potassium Channels Physiol Rev, January 1, 2005; 85(1): 319 - 371. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. H. Yu and W. A. Catterall The VGL-Chanome: A Protein Superfamily Specialized for Electrical Signaling and Ionic Homeostasis Sci. Signal., October 5, 2004; 2004(253): re15 - re15. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Lewis, Z. A. McCrossan, and G. W. Abbott MinK, MiRP1, and MiRP2 Diversify Kv3.1 and Kv3.2 Potassium Channel Gating J. Biol. Chem., February 27, 2004; 279(9): 7884 - 7892. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. A. McCrossan, A. Lewis, G. Panaghie, P. N. Jordan, D. J. Christini, D. J. Lerner, and G. W. Abbott MinK-Related Peptide 2 Modulates Kv2.1 and Kv3.1 Potassium Channels in Mammalian Brain J. Neurosci., September 3, 2003; 23(22): 8077 - 8091. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Tosaka, M. C. Casimiro, Q. Rong, S. Tella, M. Oh, A. N. Katchman, J. C. Pezzullo, K. Pfeifer, and S. N. Ebert Nicotine Induces a Long QT Phenotype in Kcnq1-Deficient Mouse Hearts J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., September 1, 2003; 306(3): 980 - 987. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Lu, M. P Mahaut-Smith, C. L-H Huang, and J. I Vandenberg Mutant MiRP1 subunits modulate HERG K+ channel gating: a mechanism for pro-arrhythmia in long QT syndrome type 6 J. Physiol., August 15, 2003; 551(1): 253 - 262. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Anantharam, A. Lewis, G. Panaghie, E. Gordon, Z. A. McCrossan, D. J. Lerner, and G. W. Abbott RNA Interference Reveals That Endogenous Xenopus MinK-related Peptides Govern Mammalian K+ Channel Function in Oocyte Expression Studies J. Biol. Chem., March 28, 2003; 278(14): 11739 - 11745. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Tian, W. Liu, Y. Wu, H. Rafi, A. S. Segal, and G. V. Desir Regulation of the voltage-gated K+ channel KCNA10 by KCNA4B, a novel beta -subunit Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, July 1, 2002; 283(1): F142 - F149. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. W. ABBOTT and S. A. N. GOLDSTEIN Disease-associated mutations in KCNE potassium channel subunits (MiRPs) reveal promiscuous disruption of multiple currents and conservation of mechanism FASEB J, March 1, 2002; 16(3): 390 - 400. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Research Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2001 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |