| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Integrative Physiology |
From The Burnham Institute (G.P., J.C.R.), La Jolla, Calif, and the Shiley Eye Center (D.U.B.) and Department of Bioengineering (C.V., J.H.O., A.D.M.), University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, Calif.
Correspondence to Dr J.C. Reed, The Burnham Institute, 10901 N Torrey Pines Rd, La Jolla, CA 92037. E-mail jreed{at}burnham-inst.org
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: aging genetic screening heart Drosophila melanogaster
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Several groups have exploited Drosophila genetics for identifying genes regulating cardiac development in the fly, and this approach has proved to be useful for guiding research on cardiac development in vertebrates. One of the more notable examples is the identification of the Drosophila gene tinman,4 which prompted the cloning of homologues regulating cardiac development in mice (Nkx2-5/Csx).5 6 The finding of homologous genes that similarly influence development of the heartlike organ of Drosophila and the mouse heart suggests that at least some aspects of fly cardiac biology are common to mammals. The relevance of some fly genes to human cardiac pathology is also supported by the finding that mutations in the HERG potassium channel gene cause long QT syndrome, a potentially fatal cardiac arrhythmia.7 HERG stands for "human ether-a-go-gorelated gene," and it was first identified by virtue of its homology to the Drosophila potassium channel gene "ether-a-go-go."8
Several human disease models have been developed in
Drosophila, particularly models
for neurological diseases.9 10 11
Drosophila is also commonly
used as a model organism for studying the genetics of aging, partly
because it represents a genetically tractable organism with a
short lifespan.12 For
example, genetic screening has allowed the identification of a single
gene that controls the lifespan in flies, increasing it by
35%.13 However,
essentially nothing is known about cardiac changes that might occur
with aging in the fly, and attempts have not yet been made to exploit
Drosophila genetics for
investigations of adult cardiac dysfunction.
The relation between aging and heart disease is
clear.14 The prevalence of
heart failure is almost 70 times higher in persons aged
65 years than
in persons aged 20 to 34
years.14 Furthermore, cardiac
functional reserve declines with age in
humans.15 16 Nearly
80% of hospital admissions in the United States for heart failure
involve patients aged >65
years.17 Cardiac aging and
heart disease are 2 distinct but interacting processes.
Therefore, we sought to explore cardiac function in flies during aging, asking whether an age-associated decline in some aspect of cardiac performance occurs and attempting to develop a methodology for studying the heartlike organ in intact adult flies. In humans, impairments in cardiac function are commonly revealed only under stress, inasmuch as resting function is affected only in very advanced forms of cardiac disease.15 16 For this reason, we explored ways of challenging the fly heart. Two methods were developed that tested the ability of the Drosophila heart to sustain an elevated heart rate: (1) elevated ambient temperature, which triggers an endogenous response that results in increased heart rate, and (2) external electrical pacing using microelectrodes to drive the heart to contract at higher frequencies. Using these methods, we have documented striking reductions in cardiac function with aging in Drosophila, particularly a decline in the maximal heart rate achievable. These observations in flies are remarkably similar to some aspects of the age-related decline in cardiac performance observed in humans, which includes an age-associated decrease in maximum heart rate.15 The findings may lay a foundation for the eventual application of genome-wide screens for genes that accelerate or retard age-associated heart dysfunction with the use of Drosophila. The identification of genes affecting cardiac aging (and their interaction with genes affecting heart disease) is our main aim.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
40 flies per bottle). The
flies were fed a standard yeast-cornmeal-molasses-agar diet and
transferred to new bottles every 4 days. All experiments were carried
out with male flies, unless otherwise specified, to avoid the effects
of pregnancy on cardiovascular
function.
Anesthesia
Triethylamine was used as an anesthetic agent as a
50% solution (Flynap, Carolina Biological Supply Co). This was
administered by use of an absorbent wand that was dipped in the
anesthetic and then inserted into the vial containing flies. The flies
were removed from the vial as soon as they were immobile. Ether and
CO2 were used for preliminary comparison of
anesthesia methods. Ether was administered as described for
triethylamine, whereas CO2 was delivered as a
continuous gas flow.
Measurements of Heart Rates
Anesthetized flies were mounted on glass
slides and observed with a Nikon Diaphot-TMD inverted microscope, with
Nomarski (DIC) optics (without analyzer) and a x10 (numerical
aperture 0.25) objective. Images were obtained by closing the diaphragm
so that the light beam was concentrated on the first ventricle of the
heart. Flies were positioned on their backs, exactly perpendicular to
the light path, and fixed in this position by mounting the wings on the
glass slide with double-stick tape. Images of the first cardiac
ventricle were recorded by using a Sony DXC-101 videocamera on VHS
tape, and the heart rate was measured from slow-motion replays.
End-diastolic and end-systolic dimensions were
measured on still images at the midpoint between the 2 major
transversal tracheal tubes passing over the first cardiac
ventricle.
Temperature Stress Test
Two different protocols were used for stimulating
elevations in heart rate as a result of increased ambient temperature.
In protocol 1, the flies were anesthetized, and the temperature
was increased progressively from 22°C to 28°C over the course of 1
hour. Measurements were taken at 22°C and at 28°C. A control group
was kept at room temperature for the same amount of time under the same
conditions of immobilization and did not show any change in heart rate.
In protocol 2, the flies were anesthetized and then inserted
into an incubator containing the Diaphot microscope at 2 minutes before
recording. This was done in separate groups at temperatures of
28°C, 32°C, 35°C, and 38°C. No significant differences in heart
rate were noted at 28°C with use of the 2 protocols, regardless of
fly age.
External Electrical Pacing
Platinum electrodes and a model 611 square-wave
stimulator (Phipps & Bird) were used for external cardiac pacing. The
electrodes were positioned on the ventral surface of the abdomen by use
of a micromanipulator, and heart images were recorded as described
previously. Electrode gel (Signa gel, Parker) was applied on the
electrodes. The pacing protocol consisted of pulses of 20-second
duration, with each pulse followed by a recovery period of 1 minute.
The pacing rate was increased in 1-Hz steps for each fly from 5 Hz (300
bpm) to 8 Hz (480 bpm) for the 22°C experiment. At 28°C, given the
higher baseline heart rate values, the pacing was increased from 6 Hz
(360 bpm) to 9 Hz (540 bpm). The duration of the pacing stimuli was 30
ms, and the voltage was 40 V. Lower voltages and durations failed to
capture consistently during external
pacing.
Experiments With GFP Transgenic Flies
Transgenic flies expressing GFP (S65T) under the
control of the distal actin 5c promoter were generated by Drs J.M.
Reichart and D. Ferrandon
(http://www-ibmc.u-strasbg.fr/upr9022/GreenBalancers.html). We used 2
different microscopes, which provided images of similar quality. One
was the Heidelberg Retina Angiograph (Heidelberg Engineering), a
confocal laser-scanning system developed for digital
fluorescein angiography in ophthalmic
patients.18 The other was a
Bio-Rad MRC-1024 confocal microscope. Flies were anesthetized
as described previously, and the wings were attached to glass slides.
Images were recorded in digital form and analyzed with
image analysis software (NIH Image). Absolute quantification of
ventricular dimensions was obtained for these flies with
the use of the Nikon Diaphot-TMD microscope to scale the relative
measurements obtained.
Automated Heart Rate Detection
We developed a semiautomated digital image-processing
method to measure heart rate and its variation directly from video
signals recorded in a single fly. Whereas careful manual counting
might be more accurate, it is not practical on a large scale; hence,
more automated techniques were required. Automated detection also
allows additional parameters such as heart rate variability
to be detected in a single fly. Video image sequences were stored in
the memory of a Pentium IIbased microcomputer with use of a
high-resolution video frame grabber (Data Translation DT3155), at a
sampling frequency of 30 frames per second. For each fly, we acquired
2-second video sequences (60 frames each) 10 times consecutively, and
we developed custom software to construct a time-space image signal
representing the time course of image intensity along a
line segment of pixels that crosses the ventricular lumen
transverse to the heart axis. After applying a low-pass filter to
reduce noise in the time-space signal, the heart rate was estimated by
automated counting of the peaks in the signal. From the unfiltered
time-space signal, we obtained a second measure of heart rate by
computing the autocorrelation and then the spectral density (by fast
Fourier transformation),19
confirming the previous calculation. An average and a standard
deviation of the 10 repetitions in the same fly were obtained, and the
coefficient of variation was
calculated.20
Statistical Analysis
All results are expressed as mean±SEM. ANOVA was
used to analyze age-associated changes in heart rate with the
Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. The incidence of
fibrillation-like rhythm was analyzed by use of the
2 statistic. The other comparisons were
made by use of the t test.
Values of P<0.05 were
considered statistically
significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Resting Heart Rate Declines With Age in
Drosophila
The average heart rate measured at room temperature
(22°C) decreased progressively with age
(Figure 1
). In male flies at 10 days of age, the mean heart
rate was 286±3 bpm (n=59), compared with 249±5 bpm (n=29) at 31 days
of age and 220±3 bpm (n=64) at 54 days of age
(P<0.01 for comparisons
between all age groups). A similar decrease in heart rate was also
observed in female flies: 271±6 bpm in 10-day-old flies (n=14) versus
189±5 bpm in 54-day-old flies (n=26)
(P<0.01). The age-related
decline in heart rate was also confirmed in the GFP transgenic strain:
275±8 bpm in 15-day-old flies versus 216±6 bpm in 56-day-old flies
(P<0.01), measured at 22°C.
An example of the images used for measuring heart rate is shown in
Figure 2
(top panels).
|
|
Temperature Stress Tests Reveal Age-Associated
Cardiac Impairment in
Drosophila
With the use of temperature stress test protocol 1, in
which heart rates were measured at 28°C (compared with measurements
at 22°C), a more pronounced effect of age on average heart rate was
observed. For every age group examined, increased ambient temperature
resulted in a faster heart rate. The average heart rate measured in
male flies was 339±6 bpm (n=26) at 10 days of age compared with 301±9
bpm at 31 days of age (n=19) and 254±10 bpm (n=14) at 54 days of age
(Figure 1
). The effects of age and temperature on mean heart
rate were statistically significant for all pairwise comparisons of the
data (P<0.01).
Using temperature stress test protocol 2, we studied flies
at 28°C, 32°C, 35°C, and 38°C
(Figure 3
). At every age tested, heart rates measured at
28°C with the use of protocol 1 and protocol 2 were not significantly
different, confirming the reproducibility of these results. For every
age group examined, temperature-induced increases in heart rate reached
a plateau by 35°C. Therefore, using 35°C for comparisons, we
observed a decline in the mean heart rate of flies with increasing age,
from 440±7 bpm (n=10) at 10 days of age to 372±8 bpm (n=6) at 30 days
of age to 288±10 bpm (n=9) at 54 days of age
(P<0.01 between all groups)
(Figure 3
).
|
External Electrical Pacing
External electrical pacing was used to estimate the
maximal heart rate achievable in young and old flies at 2 different
temperatures. The electrical pulse interval could be decreased to a
limit beyond which the heart rate failed to increase further. The
maximum frequency of stimulated contractions was recorded as the
estimated maximum achievable heart rate. Using this method, we found
that the maximum achievable heart rate is substantially lower in older
flies: at 22°C, 411±13 bpm (n=15) in 10-day-old flies versus 303±8
bpm (n=14) in 59-day-old flies
(P=0.0001)
(Figure 4
).
|
Electrical pacing often triggered a fibrillation-like rhythm. The heart walls initially displayed very fine and fast tremors rather than full contractions, and the heart subsequently stopped completely. Interestingly, fibrillation occurred (at 22°C) in only 20% of the 10-day-old flies (3 of 15 flies) compared with almost 70% of the 59-day-old flies (12 of 18 flies) (P=0.02). Furthermore, all younger flies tested (n=15) returned to normal rhythm within 2 minutes, whereas 40% of the older flies that went into this fibrillation-like rhythm never recovered (5 of 18 flies).
We also performed the pacing experiment at 28°C. The maximum achievable heart rate was again lower in older flies: 498±9.6 bpm in 6-day-old flies (n=12) versus 414±18 bpm in 59-day-old-flies (n=6) (P=0.001). Fibrillation occurred in 25% of the 6-day-old flies (3 of 12 flies) compared with 78% of 59-day-old flies (11 of 14 flies) (P=0.02). All younger flies tested at 28°C returned to normal rhythm within 2 minutes, but none of the older ones did (P=NS comparing incidence of fibrillation in flies paced at 28°C versus 22°C).
These findings suggest the presence of age-associated electrophysiological defects in the hearts of aged flies.
Heart Rate Variability
Using automated heart rate detection software, we
compared heart rate variability (ie, oscillations in heart
rate with time in each fly) between young (6-day-old, n=9) and aged
(47-day-old, n=8) flies
(Figure 5
). The coefficient of variation of heart rate was
significantly larger in older flies: 14.8±1.4 (aged) versus 9.2±0.4
(young) (P=0.001). We also
confirmed with the automated image processing method the age-associated
decline in heart rate (at 25°C): 310±6 bpm (young) versus 245±9 bpm
(aged) (P<0.01), thus
corroborating our results reported above.
|
Estimation of End-Systolic and
End-Diastolic Heart Dimensions
We used several methods to estimate
end-systolic and end-diastolic dimensions but
failed to detect significant alterations associated with aging (at
least within the resolution of our methods). For example, when we used
the same microscope that was used for heart rate determinations (for
which images were recorded and film frames were frozen at the end
of systole or diastole), we measured mean
end-systolic diameters of 4.4±0.5 versus 4.0±0.7 µm and
mean end-diastolic diameters of 34.8±1.15 (n=51) versus
36.8±1.15 (n=58) µm in 10-day-old compared with 54-day-old male
flies, respectively. The fractional shortening did not differ between
the older (0.9±0.03) and the younger (0.87±0.01) flies.
Measurements of end-systolic and
end-diastolic diameter of the fly heart were greatly
assisted by imaging GFP-expressing transgenic flies. However, even in
this case, by use of 2 different microscopy techniques, no significant
age-associated differences in cardiac dimensions were detected: end
systole was 8.0±1 versus 7.5±1 µm and end diastole was
33±3 (n=18) versus 36±2 (n=14) µm in 10-day-old compared with
54-day-old flies, respectively. The fractional shortening was also not
changed: 0.79±0.03 in 54-day-old flies and 0.75±0.02 in 10-day-old
flies.
Figure 2
(bottom panels) shows an example of
systolic and diastolic images in a
fly.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our finding of an age-associated reduction in heart rate in flies is consistent with the decrease in exercise capacity observed in Drosophila with aging.23 24 In this regard, it has been documented that aging flies have reduced exercise tolerance compared with young flies, as measured by climbing ability. Thus, our observations reveal intriguing similarities between the decline in cardiac function during aging in flies and humans. For example, data from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging15 demonstrated that a significant but limited reduction of resting heart rate occurs with age in humans. However, that study also documented that a much more pronounced decrease in maximum heart rate achieved during exercise is associated with aging.15 The intrinsic sinus rate in humans (measured in the presence of both sympathetic and parasympathetic blockade) is also significantly diminished with age.25 Age-related changes in heart rate have also been reported in rats.26
Our findings of an increased likelihood of fibrillation during pacing and increased rate irregularity in the hearts of older flies are also consistent with the results obtained in mammals. Aging in humans, even in those apparently free of disease, is accompanied by an increased incidence of cardiac arrhythmias.27 The occurrence of Ca2+-dependent ventricular fibrillation is also increased in older rats.28
It has been reported that in mammals,29 pacing can elicit equivalent heart rates in senescence, whereas other stimuli do not. There are several possible explanations for the different results we obtained with pacing in flies. The high incidence of fibrillation that we report might impede the effects of pacing in older fly hearts. It is also possible that this might represent a difference between species. In fact, we wish to stress that our expectation is not that the aging fly heart might mimic in every respect the mammalian counterpart, but more realistically, we propose that in our genetically more tractable model, rapid progress might be made and testable hypotheses be formulated that could be investigated further in vertebrates.
The search for genes extending the lifespan in Drosophila is actively under way and has recently begun to provide insights into the genetics of aging in this animal.13 Mutant flies have been screened for variations in lifespan, revealing that single gene mutations can increase the lifespan by as much as 35% in these invertebrate animals. However, the predominant causes of death in aged fruit flies are unknown and might be largely irrelevant to those affecting humans. Even in rats, the main causes of mortality in old animals (kidney disease and certain types of cancer) are not the same illnesses that are the most common causes of death in humans.30 Therefore, fly screenings based on mortality could lead to the identification of genes affecting a physiological processes that might not necessarily be relevant to human health.
On the other hand, investigating age-associated changes in Drosophila with a focus on cardiac function has clear advantages. By directly assessing the status of the heart, the complexity of the object of study is reduced, which might be expected to yield a smaller, more manageable, set of candidate genes for subsequent analysis after initial genetic screens. Furthermore, several of the most promising models used in aging research (yeast31 and, recently, even bacteria32 ) are only informative for the replicative senescence of actively dividing cells. Thus, a need exists for appropriate models for the study of the aging of tissues that have very limited replicative capacity, eg, the heart; such tissues play an important role in determining human mortality.
A commonly recognized limitation in the search for single gene mutations that can lengthen the lifespan of Drosophila is inbreeding depression.33 To make a recessive mutation homozygous and to analyze its phenotype in Drosophila require inbreeding, and this favors the fixation of alleles possessing a deleterious effect on lifespan. Working on a parameter that can be measured throughout life (heart rate) might allow us to individuate beneficial mutations, detecting their effect at early ages, even against an unfavorable genetic background due to inbreeding that could shorten the lifespan nonspecifically.
Another advantage of using the fly as a model pertains to
the size of its genome. Whereas the human genome may contain between
30 000 and 40 000 genes, only
14 000 genes have been identified
in the fly genome.1 Human
genes are often members of extended families with redundant functions,
making genetic analysis problematic in higher
eukaryotes compared with invertebrates such as
Caenorhabiditis elegans or
Drosophila. Thus, approaching
the problem of age-associated cardiac deterioration in a genetically
tractable organism such as the fly can help to avoid genetic
redundancy.
Therefore, we speculate that genetic screens based on age-associated differences in heart rates under the stress of elevated temperature could be exploited for identifying evolutionarily conserved genes that either accelerate or retard the rate of age-associated cardiac decline in Drosophila. Given that a recent survey has shown remarkable conservation of human genes in the fly genome, including cardiac diseaserelevant genes,34 candidate genes identified by such genetic screens have a strong possibility of being relevant to humans.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Rizki TM. The circulatory system and associated cells and tissues. In: Ashburner M, Wright TRF, eds. The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila. London, UK: Academic Press; 1978:397452.
3. Ashburner M. Drosophila: A Laboratory Handbook. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1989.
4. Bodmer R, Venkatesh TV. Heart development in Drosophila and vertebrates: conservation of molecular mechanisms. Dev Genet. 1998;22:181186.
5. Lints TJ, Parsons LM, Hartley L, Lyons I, Harvey RP. Nkx-2.5: a novel murine homeobox gene expressed in early heart progenitor cells and their myogenic descendants. Development. 1993;119:419431.
6. Komuro I, Izumo S. Csx: a murine homeobox-containing gene specifically expressed in the developing heart. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90:81458149.
7. Curran ME, Splawski I, Timothy KW, Vincent GM, Green ED, Keating MT. A molecular basis for cardiac arrhythmia: HERG mutations cause long QT syndrome. Cell. 1995;80:795803.
8. Warmke JW, Ganetzky B. A family of potassium channel genes related to eag in Drosophila and mammals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994;91:34383442.
9. Min KT, Benzer S. Preventing neurodegeneration in the Drosophila mutant bubblegum. Science. 1999;284:19851988.
10. Kazemi-Esfarjani P, Benzer S. Genetic suppression of polyglutamine toxicity in Drosophila. Science. 2000;287:18371840.
11. Feany MB, Bender WW. A Drosophila model of Parkinsons disease. Nature. 2000;404:394398.
12. Rose MR. Evolutionary Biology of Aging. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1991.
13. Lin YJ, Seroude L, Benzer S. Extended life-span and stress resistance in the Drosophila mutant methuselah. Science. 1998;282:943946.
14. American Heart Association. 2000 Heart and Stroke Statistical Update. Dallas, Tex: American Heart Association; 1999.
15. Fleg JL, OConnor F, Gerstenblith G, Becker LC, Clulow J, Schulman SP, Lakatta EG. Impact of age on the cardiovascular response to dynamic upright exercise in healthy men and women. J Appl Physiol. 1995;78:890900.
16. Lakatta EG. Circulatory function in younger and older humans in health. In: Hazzard WR, Blass JP, Ettinger WH, Halter JB, Ouslander JG, eds. Principles of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1999:645660.
17. Rich MW. Heart failure. In: Hazzard WR, Blass JP, Ettinger WH, Halter JB, Ouslander JG, eds. Principles of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1999:679700.
18. Bartsch DU, Weinreb RN, Zinser G, Freeman WR. Confocal scanning infrared laser ophthalmoscopy for indocyanine green angiography. Am J Ophthalmol. 1995;120:642651.
19. Chatfield C. The Analysis of Time Series. London, UK: Chapman and Hall; 1980.
20. Armitage P, Berry G. Statistical Methods in Medical Research. 3rd ed. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Scientific; 1994.
21. Burch GE, Sohal RS, Fairbanks LD. Senescent changes in the heart of Drosophila repleta Wollaston. Nature. 1970;225:286288.
22. Burch GE, Sohal R, Fairbanks LD. Ultrastructural changes in Drosophila heart with age. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1970;89:128136.
23. Le Bourg E, Lints FA. Hypergravity and aging in Drosophila melanogaster, 4: climbing activity. Gerontology. 1992;38:5964.
24. Ganetzky B, Flanagan JR. On the relationship between senescence and age-related changes in two wild-type strains of Drosophila melanogaster. Exp Gerontol. 1978;13:189196.
25. Jose AD. Effect of combined sympathetic and parasympathetic blockade on heart rate and cardiac function in man. Am J Cardiol. 1966;18:476478.
26. Roberts J, Goldberg PB. Changes in basic cardiovascular activities during the lifetime of the rat. Exp Aging Res. 1976;2:487517.
27. Lakatta EG. Cardiovascular regulatory mechanisms in advanced age. Physiol Rev. 1993;73:413467.
28. Hano O, Bogdanov KY, Sakai M, Danziger RG, Spurgeon HA, Lakatta EG. Reduced threshold for myocardial cell calcium intolerance in the rat heart with aging. Am J Physiol. 1995;269:H1607H1612.
29. Yin FC, Spurgeon HA, Greene HL, Lakatta EG, Weisfeldt ML. Age-associated decrease in heart rate response to isoproterenol in dogs. Mech Ageing Dev. 1979;10:1725.
30. Yu BP, Masoro EJ, Murata I, Bertrand HA, Lynd FT. Life span study of SPF Fischer 344 male rats fed ad libitum or restricted diets: longevity, growth, lean body mass and disease. J Gerontol. 1982;37:130141.
31. Sinclair DA, Mills K, Guarente L. Molecular mechanisms of yeast aging. Trends Biochem Sci. 1998;23:131134.
32. Pennisi E. Evolutionary trends from bacteria to birds. Science. 2000;289:11311133.
33. Tower J. Aging mechanisms in fruit flies. Bioessays. 1996;18:799807.
34. Fortini ME, Skupski MP, Boguski MS, Hariharan IK. A survey of human disease gene counterparts in the Drosophila genome. J Cell Biol. 2000;150:F23F30.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Cammarato, C. M. Dambacher, A. F. Knowles, W. A. Kronert, R. Bodmer, K. Ocorr, and S. I. Bernstein Myosin Transducer Mutations Differentially Affect Motor Function, Myofibril Structure, and the Performance of Skeletal and Cardiac Muscles Mol. Biol. Cell, February 1, 2008; 19(2): 553 - 562. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. T. Wasserthal Drosophila flies combine periodic heartbeat reversal with a circulation in the anterior body mediated by a newly discovered anterior pair of ostial valves and `venous' channels J. Exp. Biol., November 1, 2007; 210(21): 3707 - 3719. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. E. Broderick, M. Balasubramanian, A. Chan, P. Potluri, J. Feala, D. D. Belke, A. McCulloch, V. S. Sharma, R. B. Pilz, T. D. Bigby, et al. The Cobalamin Precursor Cobinamide Detoxifies Nitroprusside-Generated Cyanide Experimental Biology and Medicine, June 1, 2007; 232(6): 789 - 798. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Ocorr, N. L. Reeves, R. J. Wessells, M. Fink, H.-S. V. Chen, T. Akasaka, S. Yasuda, J. M. Metzger, W. Giles, J. W. Posakony, et al. KCNQ potassium channel mutations cause cardiac arrhythmias in Drosophila that mimic the effects of aging PNAS, March 6, 2007; 104(10): 3943 - 3948. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. E. Broderick, J. Feala, A. McCulloch, G. Paternostro, V. S. Sharma, R. B. Pilz, and G. R. Boss The nitric oxide scavenger cobinamide profoundly improves survival in a Drosophila melanogaster model of bacterial sepsis FASEB J, September 1, 2006; 20(11): 1865 - 1873. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Akasaka, S. Klinedinst, K. Ocorr, E. L. Bustamante, S. K. Kim, and R. Bodmer The ATP-sensitive potassium (KATP) channel-encoded dSUR gene is required for Drosophila heart function and is regulated by tinman PNAS, August 8, 2006; 103(32): 11999 - 12004. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. K. Johnson, S. W. McKechnie, and D. J. Clancy Water balance and cation levels in Drosophila: can early physiological decline predict aging and longevity? J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., February 1, 2006; 61(2): 146 - 152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Wolf, H. Amrein, J. A. Izatt, M. A. Choma, M. C. Reedy, and H. A. Rockman From The Cover: Drosophila as a model for the identification of genes causing adult human heart disease PNAS, January 31, 2006; 103(5): 1394 - 1399. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. G. Lakatta Heart Aging : A Fly in the Ointment? Circ. Res., May 25, 2001; 88(10): 984 - 986. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Research Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2001 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |